The subject matter disclosed herein relates to power converter precharging to charge a DC bus capacitor.
Various aspects of the present disclosure are now summarized to facilitate a basic understanding of the disclosure, wherein this summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure, and is intended neither to identify certain elements of the disclosure, nor to delineate the scope thereof. Rather, the primary purpose of this summary is to present various concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form prior to the more detailed description that is presented hereinafter. Disclosed examples include power converters, protection systems and methods to protect a precharge circuit in which a precharge resistor voltage is indirectly monitored during a normal operating mode, and a rectifier and an inverter are selectively disabled in response to the indirectly measured precharge resistor voltage indicating a fault in a precharge circuit SCR.
The following description and drawings set forth certain illustrative implementations of the disclosure in detail, which are indicative of one or more exemplary ways in which the various principles of the disclosure may be carried out. The illustrated examples are not exhaustive of the many possible embodiments of the disclosure. Various objects, advantages and novel features of the disclosure will be set forth in the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
Referring now to the figures, several embodiments or implementations are hereinafter described in conjunction with the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout, and wherein the various features are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The precharge circuit 108 controls charging of a DC bus capacitor CDC of the DC bus circuit 114, for example, during system power up. In the illustrated three-phase system, the precharge circuit 108 is a single phase SCR-based implementation, including an SCR and a diode for each of the three input phases. The precharge circuit 108 includes a precharge input to receive a three phase AC input signal from the source 102, as well as a three phase precharge output to deliver a three phase AC signal to the input of the rectifier circuit 112. In a first phase, the precharge circuit 108 includes an SCR SCR1 and a diode D1 connected in parallel with one another between the first phase input and the first phase output. SCR1 is coupled between the precharge input and the precharge output to selectively allow or prevent current flow from the precharge input to the precharge output, and the diode D1 is coupled between the precharge input and the precharge output to allow current flow from the precharge output to the precharge input. In addition, the first phase of the precharge circuit 108 includes a precharge resistor RPC coupled between the precharge input and the precharge output. In operation, the precharge resistor RPC controls current flow from the precharge input to the precharge output when SCR1 is off during a precharge operating mode. In a normal operating mode of the system 106, SCR1 is turned on to bypass the precharge resistor RPC. The second phase of the circuit 108 includes SCR2 and a second diode D2 between the corresponding precharge circuit input and output. The third phase includes similarly connected SCR3 and a diode D3.
The illustrated precharge circuit 108 is an SCR-based topology in which a precharge resistor RPC is provided in only a single phase of the multiphase circuit. In other implementations, one or more of the other phases can include a parallel-connected precharge resistor (not shown). SCR based precharge topologies with parallel resistors can be used in association with many different forms of motor drives and power conversion systems, generally, such as regenerative adjustable speed drives (ASDs). The precharge resistor RPC is used during precharging operation to control the inrush current during charging of the capacitor CDC, and is thereafter bypassed during normal operation of the system 106. After precharge is completed and normal drive operation is started, failure of an SCR to conduct can allow current flow through the precharge resistor RPC. In order to protect the precharge resistors from overload, example systems provide indirect techniques and apparatus to detect an SCR failure to conduct and initiate one or more remedial actions to protect the resistor, for example, by disabling the rectifier 112 and the inverter 116 of the system 106. Disclosed examples advantageously avoid or mitigate shortcomings of other approaches that directly measure the precharge resistor voltage, and provide significant advantages in terms of cost, size, and function.
Several different topologies exist for the precharge of adjustable speed drives. Each topology has its own advantages and disadvantages with respect to cost, size, and ease of implementation. Precharge circuits are employed to slowly raise the voltage across the DC bus capacitor when power is first applied to the drive. Failure to limit the rate of charge of the DC bus may cause a failure of the rectifier circuit due to high inrush current. SCR based precharge topologies offer several distinct advantages for ASD drives. These topologies are smaller and less expensive than solutions utilizing circuit breakers and contactors. Resistor-less precharging systems utilize a phase locked loop and angle control to fire the SCRs and raise the DC bus voltage. However, this requires isolated bootstrapping supplies and is generally more costly than parallel resistor precharge circuits. Another possible drawback to using SCR phase angle control is the complexity of control implementation.
The precharge circuit 108 in
When AC voltage is initially applied to the drive 106, series resistance provided by the resistor RPC limits the current into the rectifier 110. The series resistance slows the rate of increase in the DC bus voltage VDC across the capacitor CDC. After the DC bus reaches a nominal voltage or other threshold level in a timeframe dictated by the RC time constant of the precharge circuit 108, SCR1 is turned on and bypasses the precharge resistor RPC. One limitation of using SCRs to bypass the resistor RPC is the possibility of SCR failure during normal operation. If one or more of the SCRs fail to fully conduct, the associated precharge resistor RPC again conducts current in the circuit. SCR faults while the drive is loaded cause conduction of load current through the precharge resistor RPC, potentially leading to damage or degradation of the resistor RPC. The precharge resistor RPC could be designed to handle the full load current, but such an approach is undesirable in terms of cost, size and system weight.
Several approaches are possible to detect SCR failure. One fundamental technique would be to directly measure the voltage across the precharge resistor. After precharge has completed and the SCRs take over conduction of the current into the rectifier, the voltage drop across the precharge circuit is essentially zero. Only the forward voltage of the SCR and diode is dropped across the precharge resistor. By placing a high impedance resistor string in parallel with the precharge resistor, the voltage drop on the resistor can be measured directly. Failure of the SCR to conduct will cause the resistor to carry load current. The presence of a large voltage drop after completion of precharge will indicate failure of the SCR and trigger the drive to disable its inverter and converter. However, direct voltage measurement in hardware has drawbacks, including increased cost and size. In order to directly sense the voltage across the resistor, a string of resistors can be used. However, due to voltage spacing requirements, these strings generally are large footprint additions to a printed circuit board (PCB) design. In addition, the added parts increases cost for the PCB.
Presently disclosed examples provide protection circuitry and methods to protect the precharge circuit 108 against a failure of the SCR to commutate. The example of
In operation, if an SCR fails to conduct (e.g., by loss of control or failure of the SCR itself), the precharge resistor RPC may carry all or a portion of the drive load current, and the protection system uses a measurement of the voltage VPC across the precharge resistor RPC to determine if an SCR has failed to fire. In certain implementations, the protection system takes advantage of the fact that the precharge circuit 108 charges the capacitors of the filter circuit 110 in addition to charging the DC bus capacitor the illustrated example, the circulating current through the LCL filter capacitor during the precharge operating mode is avoided due to single phase operation. Described example solutions accommodate failure modes based on feedback from the filter circuit 110 to facilitate additional protection.
Several failure modes may exist in a given power conversion system 106, and described examples are able to detect and react to diverse failure modes based on feedback and/or sense circuit signaling to protect the precharge resistor RPC and other circuits and components of the power conversion system 106. Non-limiting examples of precharge circuit faults which can cause a high voltage drop across the precharge resistor during the normal operating mode include loss of one individual phase SCR gate control signal, loss of supply which generates the control signal, failure of the gate drive for the SCR in an individual phase, failure of the gate connector to be installed during manufacturing, failure of an individual SCR to latch in the “on” state, and failure of an individual SCR antiparallel diode (e.g., D1, D2 and/or D3 in
The power conversion system 106 in
Once the DC bus voltage VDC exceeds the first threshold VTH1 (YES at 206), the controller 118 turns the SCRs on at 208, and begins monitoring any included indirect voltage sense circuit output 126 (e.g., the FAULT signal in
If the filter currents are determined to be within the predefined range (YES at 210), the controller 118 implements the normal operating mode, labelled 211 in
At 216 in the example of
If the circuit 124 indicates excessive precharge resistor voltage (YES at 216), the controller identifies an SCR fault at 224, and takes one or more remedial actions. In one example, the controller 118 discontinues the active front end rectifier operation and inverter operation at 224, and shunt trips an AC breaker of the system 106. Thereafter, the method 200 returns to 202 for subsequent system power up to again begin the precharge operating mode 201 as described hereinabove.
If the indirect voltage sense circuit 124 does not indicate excessive precharge resistor voltage (e.g., the FAULT signal is in the second LOW state, NO at 216), the controller determines whether a threshold amount of filter current imbalance exists in the filter circuit 110 at 218. In one example, the controller 118 monitors current feedback signals (labeled “FB” in
If the filter currents are sufficiently balanced (NO at 218), the controller 118 determines whether a DC bus overcurrent or overvoltage condition exists in the DC bus circuit 114 at 220 in
If no DC bus overcurrent or overvoltage condition is detected (NO at 220), the controller 118 determines at 222 whether a line overcurrent condition exists. In one example, the feedback signaling FB from the filter circuit 110 includes input line current feedback signals or values. In this implementation, the controller 118 compares the line current values with one or more thresholds to determine whether an overcurrent condition exists with respect to the monitored line current. If so (YES at 222), the controller identifies an SCR fault, discontinues rectifier an inverter operation, and shunt trips the AC breaker at 224 as described hereinabove. Otherwise (NO at 222), the controller 118 determines that no SCR fault is suspected, and the process 200 returns to 216 to again evaluate the sense circuit output and/or monitored feedback signals or values.
In the illustrated example, the curve 502 shows positive current flow through the precharge resistor, and the curves 504 and 506 in this example illustrate return current flowing through the diodes D2 and D3 during the precharge operating mode. As the DC bus capacitor CDC (e.g., and any capacitors of the filter circuit 110) gradually charge, the amplitude of the current signals shown in curve 502, 504 and 506 correspondingly decrease. Once the precharging is completed, the controller 118 turns the SCRs on. Activation of the SCRs causes the initial current signal transient in
In one example, the protection system monitors whether the input current and/or LCL current feedback are bipolar and balanced within certain predefined ranges to verify that the SCRs are correctly commutating (e.g., at 210 in
A graph 700 in
In response to an SCR fault, the circuit 306, 308 latches the buffer circuit output signal and provide the fault signal FAULT in a first state (e.g., HIGH) indicating a fault in the SCR, or in a second state (e.g., LOW) indicating no fault in the SCR. When the SCR fails, a high voltage is dropped across the precharge resistor RPC. This turns ON the optocoupler diode. The optocoupler acts as an isolated means of sensing the precharge resistor voltage VPC. When the optocoupler diode is on, the optocoupler transistor is also ON. When the transistor is ON, the voltage across R4 at the optocoupler output (into the buffer amplifier U2) is high (e.g., 5 V) and the SR latch (e.g., U4 and U5) latches a fault bit ON. The FAULT signal is provided to the controller 118 via the output 126 and the controller 118 inhibits the rectifier 112 and the inverter 116 in response to protect the precharge resistor RPC.
The above examples are merely illustrative of several possible embodiments of various aspects of the present disclosure, wherein equivalent alterations and/or modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon reading and understanding this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components (assemblies, devices, systems, circuits, and the like), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component, such as hardware, processor-executed software, or combinations thereof, which performs the specified function of the described component (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the illustrated implementations of the disclosure. In addition, although a particular feature of the disclosure may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Also, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in the detailed description and/or in the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”. This description uses examples to disclose various embodiments and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the disclosed subject matter, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. It will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the following claims, wherein the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3757197 | Bailey | Sep 1973 | A |
4039914 | Steigerwald et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4215304 | D'Atre et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4230979 | Espelage et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4276589 | Okawa et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4319177 | Kawada et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4496899 | Lippitt et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4545002 | Walker | Oct 1985 | A |
4833389 | Kovalk | May 1989 | A |
4864483 | Divan | Sep 1989 | A |
4870338 | Abbondanti | Sep 1989 | A |
5005115 | Schauder | Apr 1991 | A |
5041959 | Walker | Aug 1991 | A |
5083039 | Richardson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5317475 | Siepmann | May 1994 | A |
5715154 | Rault | Feb 1998 | A |
5798632 | Muljadi | Aug 1998 | A |
5933339 | Duba et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5969957 | Divan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002221 | Ochiai et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6118676 | Divan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6157097 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166513 | Hammond | Dec 2000 | A |
6166929 | Ma et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6229722 | Ichikawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6262555 | Hammond et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275393 | Baudelot et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301130 | Aiello et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6377478 | Morishita | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6417644 | Hammond et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6445165 | Malik et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6646842 | Pan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6735098 | Hussein et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6828742 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7158393 | Schneider | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7233465 | Lee | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7312537 | Walling | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7432686 | Erdman et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462946 | Wobben | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7505291 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508147 | Rastogi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511385 | Jones et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511975 | Hammond | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7595563 | Wobben | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7656052 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663260 | Kabatzke et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7679208 | Ko et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7692321 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7692325 | Ichinose et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7738267 | Tallam et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7746020 | Schnetzka et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755209 | Jones et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7816798 | Hehenberger | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7880343 | Kleinecke et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7929323 | Schmidt | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7965529 | Gibbs et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8030791 | Lang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8154895 | Gilmore | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8223515 | Abolhassani et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8816625 | Kopiness et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9673695 | Li | Jun 2017 | B1 |
20020191426 | Hussein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035311 | Phadke | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063481 | Kojori | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040095784 | Zhou | May 2004 | A1 |
20060232250 | Sihler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080074812 | Oestreich et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080186750 | Gilmore | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100078998 | Wei et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100080022 | Schmidt | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110038185 | Swamy et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057444 | Dai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057588 | Rineh et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130094258 | Royak | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119903 | Weiss et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130241451 | Wei et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130289911 | Patel | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140292246 | Chae | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140300298 | Liu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160065103 | Glenn | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201388162 | Jan 2010 | CN |
104079199 | Oct 2014 | CN |
1091478 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2002345258 | Nov 2002 | JP |
WO 2013094886 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Blaabjerg, Frede et al., “Single Current Sensor Technique in the DC Link of Three-phase PWM-VS Inverters: A Review and a Novel Solution”, Citations, vol. 33, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1997, XP-000739841. |
Gilmore et al., “Pre-charge Circuit Utilizing Non-Linear Firing Angle Control,” Industry Applications Conference, 1996. Thirty-First IAS Annual Meeting, IAS '96., Conference Record of the 1996 IEEE, San Diego, CA 1996, pp. 1099-1105 vol. 2. |
Wei et al., “Single Phase Precharge Control Method for Active Front End Rectifier,” 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Milwaukee, WI, 2016, pp. 1-6. |
Patel et al., “Mitigation of the Effects of Common-Mode Current on the Operation of SCR-Based Rectifiers for AC Drives,” 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, 2015, pp. 2949-2955. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190229521 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |