The technical field relates generally to scraping devices, more particularly to scraping devices for cleaning roadway surfaces, such as roadway surfaces covered with snow, ice, etc.
Numerous devices have been developed in the past to facilitate cleaning of surfaces that are at least partially covered with undesirable solid materials, liquid materials, or both, attached or not to these surfaces. However, there is always room for further improvements in this area of technology. Improvements in the overall efficiency of the cleaning are particularly desirable.
According to one aspect, there is provided a scraping device for cleaning a roadway surface, the scraping device having a right side, a left side and a lowermost edge, the scraping device including: two opposing lateral wings forming the right and left sides of the scraping device, each wing extending in a lateral direction, between an inner edge and an outer edge, and having its inner edge configured to pivot about a vertical pivot axis, each wing including: an upper section through which the wing is attached to the vertical pivot axis, the upper section having a lowermost edge; a bottom section pivotable relative to the upper section about a first horizontal pivot axis, which first horizontal pivot axis is located at a position that is adjacent to the vertical pivot axis and also adjacent to the lowermost edge of the upper section; at least one actuator mounted to pivot the wing about the vertical pivot axis; and a first force-generating mechanism mounted between the upper section and the bottom section to exert a first return force urging the bottom section downwards with reference to the upper section.
According to another aspect, there is provided a scraping device as shown, described and/or suggested herein.
According to another aspect, there is provided a method of cleaning a roadway surface as shown, described and/or suggested herein.
Details of the various aspects of the proposed concept will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and the appended figures to which reference is made.
This scraping device 100 is designed to clean a roadway surface 104, for example to clean, clear or otherwise remove materials such as snow and ice. The scraping device 100 can also be used to clean other kinds of materials, for example earth, mud, gravel, stones, waste, etc. The scraping device 100 engages the roadway surface 104 at a lowermost edge 100a. The lowermost edge 100a of the scraping device 100 is shown as being slightly above the roadway surface 104 in
It should be noted that the term “roadway surface” is used herein in a generic sense and generally refers to all the surfaces that can be cleaned by the scraping device 100. The roadway surface 104 may be the upper surface of a street or road but it can also be, for instance, a sidewalk, a parking lot, a pedestrian crossing, a commercial or residential driveway, etc. The roadway surface 104 could even be a surface that is not outdoors or be an unpaved surface. In the latter case, the unpaved surface on which travels the vehicle 102 carrying the scraping device 100 constitutes the roadway surface 104. Other variants are also possible.
The arrow 106 in
In the example illustrated in
The central support 110 in the example is significantly smaller in width than that of each of the wings 120. The width is about ⅓ of the width of each wing 120 but variants are possible. For instance, it can be from 1 to 90% of the average width of each wing 120, such as from 80 to 90%, or from 70 to 80%, or from 60 to 70%, or from 50 to 60%, or from 40 to 50%, or from 30 to 40% m or from 20 to 30%, or from 10 to 20%, or from 1 to 10% of the average width of each wing 120.
The central support 110 serves as a point of attachment to the vehicle 102 carrying the scraping device 100. As schematically shown in
Each wing 120 in the example generally extends in a lateral direction 122, between an inner edge 124 and an outer edge 126. It should be noted that the lateral direction 122 of the right wing 120 is diametrically opposite that of the left wing 120 when the wings 120 are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 108, as shown in
The rear carriage 112 in the example of
The scraping device 100 forms what is sometimes called a V-blade or a V-plow in the technical field. It is particularly advantageous to clean areas that are sometimes narrow in width because the overall width of the scraping device 100 can be modified by changing the angular position of the wings 120 with reference to the longitudinal axis 108. The width can vary between a minimum width and a maximum width. The width is maximal when the wings 120 are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 108, as shown in
The different possible orientations of the wings 120 also give many options to the operator on how the materials can be handled. For example, the operator may simply want to push the materials towards each side of the wings 120 as the scraping device 100 travels forward. The outer edges 126 of both wings 120 will then be positioned at the rear, as shown for instance in
Each wing 120 is an assembly of parts where some are movable relative to others. As shown in
The first horizontal pivot axis 152 is a pivot that is adjacent to (i.e. not far from but still at least a few centimeters apart) the vertical pivot axis 130 of each wing 120. It is also adjacent to the lowermost edge 142 of the corresponding upper section 140. The bottom section 150 of each wing 120 pivots about the first horizontal pivot axis 152, between at least a bottom position and an upper position. The first horizontal pivot axis 152 is substantially perpendicular to the vertical pivot axis 130 in the example and the relative motion is purely a pivotal motion. Other configurations and arrangements are possible as well.
A guiding arrangement is provided on each wing 120 in the illustrated example. Two spaced-apart and arc-shaped guide slots 154, 156 are provided on each upper section 140 in the example. They cooperate with corresponding followers 155, 157 extending across these guide slots 154, 156 to keep the sections 140, 150 of each wing 120 in a sliding engagement with one another. They also limit the pivoting motion with reference to the first horizontal pivot axis 152. Annular washers 158, 159 are provided at the back of each upper section 140 to maintain the followers 155, 157 in position. The central follower 157 is attached to an upwardly projecting part in the example. Other configurations and arrangements are possible. For instance, the slots can be provided on the bottom section 150 in some implementations. Other kinds of guiding arrangements are possible. The guiding arrangements can be omitted in some implementations. Other variants are possible as well. The bottom section 150 is itself an assembly of several parts in the example. In
In the illustrated example, the second subsection 170 includes, among other things, an upper portion 180 and a bottom portion 190. The second subsection 170 is attached to the first subsection 160 at the upper portion 180 so as to be pivotable about the second horizontal pivot axis 172. The upper portion 180 has a lowermost edge 182 and the bottom portion 190 is mainly extending below the lowermost edge 182 of the upper portion 180. The bottom portion 190 is designed to slide along the rear surface in the example. The front surface of the bottom portion 190 is slightly behind the rear surface of the upper portion 180 and can slide, although not necessarily in a linear motion, along the rear surface of the upper portion 180. The bottom portion 190 has a lowermost edge 192 defining a corresponding portion of the lowermost edge 100a of the scraping device 100. Other configurations and arrangements are possible. It is possible to have the rear surface of the bottom portion 190 in front of the upper portion 180 in some implementations. It is also possible to have a second subsection 170 that is a one-piece unit in some implementations. Other variants are possible as well.
Each bottom portion 190 can be subdivided into a plurality of juxtaposed segments 194. In the illustrated example, each wing 120 has three segments 194 but it is possible to provide a number of different segments 194, for instance two or more than three. The multiple segments 194 on each wing 120 are interconnected in the example by adjoining disks 196 and articulated links 198 located between adjacent segments 194. The segments 194 can then pivot with reference to one another to follow irregularities on the roadway surface 104. This arrangement is similar to the one described for instance in PCT patent application published on 21 Apr. 2016 under WO 2016/058106 A1. The entire contents of this publication are hereby incorporated by reference. Other configurations and arrangements are also possible. For instance, there is one where a plurality of independent discrete and juxtaposed small blades is provided. Such arrangement is described for instance in the Canadian Patent No. 2,796,157 issued on 13 Aug. 2013. The entire contents of this publication are also hereby incorporated by reference. Other variants are possible as well and having an undivided bottom portion 190 is possible.
As can also be seen in
As can be seen in
Still, the main bottom part 144 of each wing 120 has a larger vertical width near the vertical pivot axis 130 than that of the distal part thereof in the illustrated example. It is substantially T-shaped. The lowermost edge 142 of the upper section 140 is thus not a straight line in the example. The hinge members 134 for the wings 120 are affixed to the main bottom part 144. Other configurations and arrangements are possible.
The first force-generating mechanism is associated with the angular positioning of the bottom section 150 with reference to the upper section 140 of each wing 120. In the illustrated example, the first force-generating mechanism includes at least one compression helical spring 220. This spring 220 mounted around a telescopic shaft extending between the upper section 140 and the first subsection 160 of the bottom section 150 of each wing 120. Each end of the telescopic shaft is attached to a corresponding pivot. The first force-generating mechanism allows exerting a first return force urging the bottom section 150 downwards around the first horizontal pivot axis 152. It also serves as a shock absorber. Other configurations and arrangements are possible. For instance, other types of force-generating mechanisms are possible, including pneumatic or hydraulic actuators. Other variants are also possible.
The second force-generating mechanism is associated with the positioning of the second subsection 170 with reference to the first subsection 160 of each wing 120 when the bottom section 150 has these two parts. In the illustrated example, the second force-generating mechanism of each wing 120 includes at least one compression helical spring 230 mounted between the first subsection 160 and the upper portion 180 of the second subsection 170. Each wing 120 includes two spaced-apart helical springs 230 in the example but variants are possible. The springs 230 exert a second return force so that the corresponding second subsection 170 always returns to a working position, namely a position where it is substantially parallel to the first subsection 160, following an impact with an obstacle on the roadway surface 104 that forced the whole second subsection 170 to pivot about the second horizontal pivot axis 172. The springs 230 also maintain the second subsections 170 in their working position. Other configurations and arrangements are possible. For instance, other types of force-generating mechanisms are possible in some implementations, including pneumatic or hydraulic actuators. Also, although the second subsections 170 of each wing 120 is a one-piece unit across the width of the wing 120, it is possible in some implementations to subdivide it in two or more discrete sections. Other variants are possible as well.
An obstacle can be defined as something on the roadway surface 104 that the lowermost edge 192 will strike in a frontal impact when moving in a forward direction 106 (
The third force-generating mechanism is associated with the positioning of the segments 194 when the second subsection 170 is not a one-piece unit. In the illustrated example, the third force-generating mechanism of each wing 120 includes at least one compression helical spring 240 mounted between the upper portion 180 and the bottom portion 190 of the second subsection 170. Each wing 120 includes two spaced-apart helical springs 240 for each segment 194 in the example but variants are possible. The springs 240 generate a third return force urging the segments 194 of the bottom portion 190 downwards so that they follow the irregularities of the roadway surface 104, thereby fine-tuning the quality of the cleaning. Other configurations and arrangements are possible. For instance, other types of force-generating mechanisms are possible in some implementations, including pneumatic or hydraulic actuators. Other variants are possible as well.
An irregularity is a variation in height of the roadway surface 104 that is not an obstacle, i.e., a change on the roadway surface 104 that does not result in a frontal impact with the scraping device 100. An irregularity occurs within about the width of a wing 120, namely between the inner edge 124 and the outer edge 126 thereof. Other situations exist as well.
As can be seen, the bottom of the central support 110 in the illustrated example has a construction similar to that of the second subsection 170 of the wings 120. It includes an upper portion 250 and a bottom portion 260. The upper portion 250 is pivotable about a horizontal pivot axis that is substantially at the same height as that of the second horizontal pivot axis 172 of each wing 120. The bottom portion 260 is also designed to move in a substantially vertical movement relative to the upper portion 250. The bottom portion 260 has a lowermost edge 262 forming a corresponding portion of the lowermost edge 100a of the scraping device 100. Other configurations and arrangements are possible.
The central support 110 in this example provides a front surface 270 that is part of the overall front surface of the scraping device 100. Nevertheless, the front surface 270 can be absent in some implementations, for instance when the central support 110 is entirely located at the back. Other configurations and arrangements are also possible.
If desired, one can also affix a band of a flexible material on the top edge of the upper part 146 and of the central support 110. These bands are schematically depicted in
Still, if desired, a strip of a resilient material can be attached to each lateral side of the wings 120. Lateral strips are schematically depicted in
As can be seen in
If desired, one can include a horizontal protection bar at the back of each wing 120.
As can be appreciated, the scraping device 100 offers a very high degree of versatility and can clean various kinds of roadway surfaces with an unprecedented level of efficiency.
It should be noted that what is described in this detailed description and illustrated in the accompanying figures is only by way of example only. A person skilled in the related art will know from reading the description and viewing the figures that variants can be made while still remaining within the limits of the proposed concept.
The present case is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/CA2018/050011 filed 5 Jan. 2018. PCT/CA2018/050011 claims the benefits of U.S. patent application No. 62/442,975 filed 5 Jan. 2017. The entire contents of these two prior patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1383409 | Liddell | Jul 1921 | A |
1609353 | Heflin | Dec 1926 | A |
2055291 | Henry | Sep 1936 | A |
2116351 | Jones | May 1938 | A |
2337434 | Washbond | Dec 1943 | A |
2615707 | Rowe et al. | Oct 1952 | A |
2650088 | Formanek | Aug 1953 | A |
2697289 | Standfuss | Dec 1954 | A |
2775830 | Kenyon | Jan 1957 | A |
2962821 | Peitl | Dec 1960 | A |
3014289 | Torrey | Dec 1961 | A |
3199234 | Reissinger | Aug 1965 | A |
3231991 | Wandscheer | Feb 1966 | A |
3400475 | Peitl | Sep 1968 | A |
3465456 | Meyer | Sep 1969 | A |
3503601 | Wells | Mar 1970 | A |
3547203 | Jackoboice | Dec 1970 | A |
3650498 | Deak | Mar 1972 | A |
3772803 | Cote | Nov 1973 | A |
3808714 | Reissinger et al. | May 1974 | A |
4031966 | Farrell | Jun 1977 | A |
4079926 | Nunes | Mar 1978 | A |
4249323 | Mathis et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4307523 | Reissinger | Dec 1981 | A |
4529080 | Dolan | Jul 1985 | A |
4570366 | Yost | Feb 1986 | A |
4597202 | Weeks | Jul 1986 | A |
4669205 | Smathers | Jun 1987 | A |
4681303 | Grassano | Jul 1987 | A |
5140763 | Nichols, IV | Aug 1992 | A |
5191729 | Verseef | Mar 1993 | A |
5263695 | Bianchi | Nov 1993 | A |
5344254 | Sartain | Sep 1994 | A |
5437113 | Jones | Aug 1995 | A |
5638618 | Niemela | Jun 1997 | A |
5697172 | Verseef | Dec 1997 | A |
5720122 | McLellan | Feb 1998 | A |
5743032 | Vauhkonen | Apr 1998 | A |
5819443 | Winter | Oct 1998 | A |
5819444 | Desmarais | Oct 1998 | A |
5899007 | Niemela | May 1999 | A |
5921010 | Schulte et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6035944 | Neuner et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6073371 | Goos et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6345583 | Thackston et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6408549 | Quenzi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442877 | Quenzi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6618965 | Schultz et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6701646 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6751894 | Verseef | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6817118 | Schmeichel | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823615 | Strait | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6892480 | Gledhill et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7100311 | Verseef | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7100314 | Jensen | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107709 | Hamel | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134227 | Quenzi et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7171770 | Schultz | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7263789 | Hollinrake et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7350774 | Chun et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7467485 | Lachance et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7493710 | Frey et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7543401 | Hughes | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555853 | Paonessa | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7631441 | Hunt | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658022 | Strait | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7681335 | Schmeichel | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7730643 | Mishra et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743536 | Evans et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7841109 | Stevens et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8776405 | Paonessa | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9051700 | Summers | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9200418 | Jones et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9611604 | Vigneault | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10480140 | Vigneault | Nov 2019 | B2 |
20030066738 | Veenhof | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050019125 | Panzarella | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060005435 | Gamble, II | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070068049 | Quenzi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090307944 | Buckbee | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110011907 | Panzarella | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110315411 | Adams | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130174452 | Diehl et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150101216 | Kerr et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20170089021 | Sankovic | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170218585 | Vigneault | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2723630 | Jun 2012 | CA |
313333 | Apr 1956 | CH |
382207 | Sep 1964 | CH |
678344 | Aug 1991 | CH |
2903176 | May 2007 | CN |
201866149 | Jun 2011 | CN |
203346934 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103498444 | Jan 2014 | CN |
205100150 | Mar 2016 | CN |
205387727 | Jul 2016 | CN |
1299675 | Jul 1969 | DE |
3608893 | Sep 1987 | DE |
3711988 | Oct 1988 | DE |
8811708 | May 1989 | DE |
4441654 | Feb 1996 | DE |
0849401 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1247906 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2154294 | Feb 2010 | EP |
1050311 | Jan 1954 | FR |
2179703 | Nov 1973 | FR |
2269608 | Nov 1975 | FR |
2349683 | Nov 1977 | FR |
2448599 | Sep 1980 | FR |
402584 | Dec 1933 | GB |
766042 | Aug 1952 | GB |
1015307 | Sep 1954 | GB |
55061623 | May 1980 | JP |
2005068908 | Mar 2005 | JP |
6004904 | Oct 2016 | JP |
200422656 | Jul 2006 | KR |
2010015992 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2018126324 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190323204 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62442975 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/CA2018/050011 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16502636 | US |