Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to shredder machines and similar crushing, pulverizing and grinding machines, and more particularly to an improved screen used for them.
Related Art
Shredder machines which use screens in close proximity to rotors have been used to break down post-consumer materials and other materials, particularly including plastic materials, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The screens are generally curved to maintain a close proximity to the cutters or blades of the spinning rotors and are generally smooth or flat on the side facing the rotor/cutter assembly. It is a known problem for the post-consumer materials to get caught in the screen and to clog the screen. This clogged screen can result in increased friction which generates additional heat and causes additional wear on the cutters and typically requires the shredder machine to be shut down so that the clogged materials can be cleared from the screen. Additionally, clogged screens can reduce the throughput of the machine. Previous screen designs have sought to solve the problem of clogged materials by using grooves on the inner side of the screen facing the rotor assembly that are aligned with the cutters on the rotor such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,305,623. When the rotor's cutters pass through the grooves, they further cut and force out any material that is caught up in the screen.
Although this previous screen design allows the rotor to clean the screen as the cutters pass through the grooves, the screen is not designed to help prevent the material from getting caught by the screen in the first instance. To use the cutters for cleaning out the materials that get caught in the screen, additional force and corresponding power is required for the rotor assembly and causes reduced throughput. This previous design also results in high stress zones at the grooves which prematurely wear down the cutters and the screen which then require servicing. The screens for most shredder machines are fabricated from metal plates in which the holes are cut or punched through the plates, and the screen is supported by a series of ribs. When material is caught in the screens, the screens can deflect and cause premature dulling of the cutters and wear on the screen, sometimes leading to the failure of the screen. It would be better to create screen designs that avoid materials becoming caught in the first instance so that additional power is not necessary and premature dulling of the cutters is prevented and the wear of screen is reduced.
Another problem with previous designs which permit materials to clog screens is the possibility of overheated gearboxes along with the additional power that is used to force the rotor to continue grinding the material. To avoid the overheating of the gearboxes, the throughput of shredders is limited because of the current screen designs which permit materials to get caught. Even without overheating the gearboxes, the increased heat of these prior art systems increases the frequency in which the gearbox oil must be changed as compared with a screen that is much less prone to getting clogged.
The present invention is an improved screen that is installed on a shredding machine in close proximity to the shredder's rotor and which has a shape that avoids clogging of the materials being processed through the shredder. The screen has a pair of mounting plates that are connected to the shredder with one mounting plate attached toward the top of the rotor and the other mounting plate attached toward the bottom of the rotor and extending the entire length of the rotor. Arcuate ribs are attached to and extend between the mounting plates, and a grid is attached to the ribs.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
Generally, the invention is an improved screen 100 that is installed on a shredding machine 110 in close proximity to the shredder's rotor 120 and which has a shape that avoids clogging of the materials being processed through the shredder. The screen has a pair of mounting plates 12 that are connected to the shredder with one mounting plate attached toward the top of the rotor and the other mounting plate attached toward the bottom of the rotor and extending the entire length of the rotor. Arcuate ribs 14 are attached to and extend between the mounting plates, and a grid 16 is attached to the ribs.
The grid 14 has lateral 32 and longitudinal 34 structural elements which surround and form the apertures 20 through which the material passes when it is ground down between the rotor 120 and the structural elements 18. Accordingly, the grid serves as a sieve with the apertures defining the sieve size. The lateral structural elements 32 extend between the ribs and are spaced apart from each other from the top mounting plate to the bottom mounting plate. The longitudinal structural elements 34 extend between and are connected to the lateral structural elements. The structural elements intersect with each other and are flush 50 with each other at the points of intersection 36. The grid has a first surface facing the rotor 38 and a second surface facing toward the arcuate ribs 40, and all of the structural elements that form the first surface have a rounded cross-sectional shape 38A proximate to the apertures 20. According to the present invention 10, the rounded 38A sides of the structural elements around the apertures or orifices minimize sharp edges in the screen which could catch material as it passes between the rotor and the grid. Additionally, the flush 50 connections between the points of intersections avoid discontinuities which could also catch material as it is passing through the apertures.
In comparison with prior art screens, examples of which is shown in
As particularly shown in
When the screen is installed on the shredder machine, the inner facing surfaces of the rods 38 are in close proximity to the rotor. The distance between the outermost knife tip of the cutters on the rotor and the innermost surface of the screen is less than one-half inch and can be approximately 5/16″ for rods having a diameter of one inch (1″) with an outer rotor diameter that is a little over one foot (1′). The size of the apertures 42 and 44 in the embodiments shown in
In the embodiments shown in
Generally, the curved cross-sectional shape of the structural elements around the apertures in the grid provides a convex rounded surface which prevents the materials being processed from catching on sharp edges, particularly at the edges of apertures and in the corners of intersecting structural elements. One benefit of the screen design according to the present invention is that it does not get clogged with material so there is less wear and tear on the screen and the cutters on the rotor so there is less maintenance. Additionally, the shredder machine can operate closer to its maximum capacity without overheating the gearbox. For example, for a particular machine processing a particular material with prior art screens, the maximum production rate could be limited to 1,500 lb per hour whereas the improved screens of the present invention can permit production rates of 4,500 lb per hour or more for the same machine and the same material. Also, the structural elements forming the grid have enough strength that when there is some materials that may initially block one of the apertures, the screen does not tear apart and the shredder blades ultimately chop the material into pieces that fit through the apertures. With prior art screens that have the sharp edges around the apertures, the lower production rates would still require more frequent replacement of the screens and the cutters on the rotors would be dulled sooner as compared with screens with curved-side apertures according to the present invention. In comparison, the screen of the present invention allows the shredder to operate at a much higher production rate and does not need to be replaced as often as the known screens with sharp-edged apertures, and the cutters on the rotors are not dulled as quickly as with the prior art screens.
Accordingly, the unique rounded shape 38A of the structural elements around the apertures in the shredder screen according to the present invention yields unexpected results by increasing the throughput capability of the shredder as compared with traditional shredder screens that clog and must be run with lower production rates. Additionally, the inventive shredder screen reduces the downtime for maintenance and the associated costs of maintenance as compared with traditional shredder screens.
As shown in
The features of the present invention can be applied to many existing screen designs. For example, as shown in
The embodiments were chosen and described to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to persons who are skilled in the art. As various modifications could be made to the exemplary embodiments, as described above with reference to the corresponding illustrations, without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative rather than limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/977,150 filed on Apr. 9, 2014 which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
763639 | Schoellhorn | Jun 1904 | A |
1185620 | Blum | Jun 1916 | A |
1286831 | Sturtevant | Dec 1918 | A |
1420355 | Williams | Jun 1922 | A |
RE17334 | Liggett | Jun 1929 | E |
2054507 | Mankoff | Sep 1936 | A |
3554454 | Gruendler | Jan 1971 | A |
3678938 | De Coene | Jul 1972 | A |
3716144 | Bartlow | Feb 1973 | A |
3722805 | Strom | Mar 1973 | A |
3788566 | Morris, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
3805955 | Bixby | Apr 1974 | A |
RE28368 | Bonarrigo, Jr. | Mar 1975 | E |
4706898 | Schonfeld | Nov 1987 | A |
4830291 | Williams | May 1989 | A |
5018674 | Williams | May 1991 | A |
5381971 | Rehmer | Jan 1995 | A |
5381972 | Chon | Jan 1995 | A |
5462238 | Smith | Oct 1995 | A |
5526988 | Rine | Jun 1996 | A |
5613907 | Harden | Mar 1997 | A |
5628467 | Graveman | May 1997 | A |
5911372 | Williams, Jr. | Jun 1999 | A |
6305623 | Sotsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7434756 | Sotsky | Oct 2008 | B2 |
8021548 | Gross | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8360349 | Sotsky | Jan 2013 | B1 |
20020050538 | Fabio | May 2002 | A1 |
20130240652 | Gardner | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150231643 | DeBoef | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150290653 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61977150 | Apr 2014 | US |