Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to medical devices and methods. In particular, the present invention relates to a method and a system for sizing an oral device to allow selection of a particular device having a proper fit for an individual patient from an inventory of such devices.
Mouthpieces, mouth guards, and a variety of other oral devices are worn by patients for a variety of purposes. Of particular interest to the present invention, certain oral devices and appliances can be used for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) which is a serious medical condition resulting from temporary airway blockage which occurs as a patient sleeps. A variety of devices have been developed over the years for altering pressure, tongue position, and other characteristics of the oral cavity in order to minimize the occurrence of sleep apnea in patients. One such oral appliance is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,122,889, assigned to the assignee of the present application, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Many oral appliances are fitted individually to the patient being treated, typically by taking a full dental impression, forming molds from the impression, and preparing devices which closely conform to the patient's dentition and jaws in order to fit the patient with great accuracy. While such highly accurate fittings may in some cases optimize patient comfort, in all cases they will take time, are inconvenient for the patient, and significantly increase the cost of the oral device.
Thus, for a wide class of oral devices, it will be desirable to provide methods and systems for fitting particular devices from inventories of pre-manufactured devices having different sizes and geometries to individual patients. In some cases, such as with athletic and other mouth guards, the fitting can be rather crude. As described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,155, in some instances it is necessary only to provide devices in three sizes (small, medium, and large) where the devices can be selected using a single sizing template 40 which can be compared to a dental impression plate 44 to determine which of the three sizes best fits the patient.
For more complex devices, such as those intended to treat sleep apnea, more accurate sizing means are desirable, and the ability to rapidly choose from a larger inventory of pre-made devices will be of great benefit. In particular, a system using multiple templates for sizing oral appliances is described in commonly owned U.S. Patent Publication 2012/0037166, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The systems include both a width measuring template for determining the distance between opposed molars and a least one separate arch sizing tool for determining the size and shape of the patient's dental arch. Based on this information, individual appliances can be selected from an inventory of such appliances, where the selected appliance would best fit the patient. Commonly owned co-pending application Ser. No. 13/476,655, describes another manual system which uses right and left overlays for sizing oral appliances.
While a great improvement over earlier systems, the sequential use of multiple templates requires multiple steps which can lead to inaccurate measurements. The simultaneous use of right and left overlays addresses some of the concerns with the use of sequential templates but the need to carefully manipulate the overlays can lead to errors particularly when deployed by less dexterous individuals.
Thus, it would be desirable to provide improved methods and systems for sizing oral appliances which minimize the number of steps and/or templates or overlays required, which are intuitive to use, and which are very accurate. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described hereinafter.
Description of the Background Art
U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,155; U.S. Publication No. 2012/0037166; and commonly owned co-pending application Ser. No. 13/476,655 have been discussed above. U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2009/0120446 describes oral appliances for treating OSA of the type which can be usefully sized by the methods and systems of the present invention.
The present invention provides methods and devices for sizing oral appliances for an individual patient. In particular, the methods, devices, and systems of the present invention allow an oral appliance size to be selected from a plurality or “inventory” of such sizes. The methods rely on obtaining a “scaled” image of the patient's dental arch and marking specific anatomic locations on the image. By “scaled” is meant that the distances apparent on the image will be registered with the actual anatomic dimensions of the patient's dental arch. The scaling information, typically in the form of a ratio between the apparent dimensions of the image and the actual anatomic dimensions of the patient's dental arch, may be provided with the image. For example if the image is obtained with a camera or other optical scanning device, a scaling ratio may be determined by matching a size registration symbol on the image with a scaling symbol on a display of the image. Once the scaled image is obtained, the user marks specific anatomic locations on the displayed image of the dental arch, and a program or “application” selects an optimum oral appliance size based on such marked locations on the scaled image. In specific embodiments, the sizing methods can be performed using a conventional hand-held device, such as a smart phone or tablet, having an on-board camera. The camera is used to acquire the image of the dental arch, either indirectly from a wax bite or directly from the patient, and the program accessed via the device is used to scale the image and make the size selection.
In a first specific aspect of the present invention, a method for selecting an oral appliance from an inventory of oral appliances comprises presenting a scaled image of a patient's dental arch on a display. Locations on opposite sides of the dental arch (opposed locations) are marked on the image, typically between at least two of the patient's adjacent molars, usually between the first and second molars, on each side of the image. A location on the patient's incisors is then marked to obtain a length dimension measured axially between the molar locations to the incisor location. The width dimension and the length dimension are then processed by a processor which selects an oral appliance size which will accommodate the patient's dental arch based on the width and length dimensions.
In exemplary embodiments, the scaled image is obtained from a bite plate. In particular, the bite plate, such as a wax bite plate, will have a size registration symbol and will be scanned by a camera to obtain a digital image. The digital image of the bite plate is then shown on the display where the user matches the size registration symbol apparent on the image of the wax bite plate with a scaling symbol generated by the processor on the display. By increasing or reducing the size of the scaling symbol so that it will match the apparent size of the registration symbol, the processor can determine the ratio of the image dimensions to the anatomic dimensions to determine the actual dimensions of the patient's dental arch.
Alternatively, a scaled image may be obtained directly from the patient's dental arch. For example, a pressure-sensitive bite plate can be used which directly generates a dimensionally scaled electronic image of the teeth when the patient bites down on the plate. Further alternatively, an intra-oral camera may be utilized to obtain the scaled image of the dental arch. Available intra-oral imaging cameras can take images which are scaled to the anatomic dimensions. In further specific embodiments, the display may comprise a touch screen, for example a touch screen on a hand-held device, and marking may comprise touching the anatomic location as it appears on the touch screen to fix that location for the processor. Alternatively, marking may comprise aligning a cursor on a conventional computer screen with a location on the display of the conventional computer. In most instances, the processor will select the oral appliance size using the scaled dimensions, such as the scaled width and length dimensions, using a look-up table which provides the optimum oral appliance size based on the scaled anatomic dimensions.
In still other specific embodiments, the marked imaged locations and selected oral appliance size may be stored in an on-board memory in the display device. Alternatively or additionally, such image, marked locations and the selected oral appliance size may be stored in memory remote from the device. E.g. in the “cloud,” or in a central location intended specifically for storing such information.
In a second specific aspect of the present invention, a device for selecting an oral appliance from an inventory of oral appliances comprises a display, a user interface, and a processor. The display will be any conventional electronic display, typically being a touch-screen display in which case the display will also provide the user interface. In other instances, the display may be configured with a keyboard or other external interface, such as in a table-top or laptop computer.
The processor is programmed to present a scaled image of the patient's dental arch to a user on the display. The processor can detect markings on the image of at least two opposed locations on the patient's molars to obtain a width dimension. The processor can also detect a marking on the image of the patient's incisors to obtain a length dimension. Based on the width and length dimensions, the processor can select an oral appliance size which will optimally accommodate the patient's oral arch, and the selected appliance size and/or a device designation, will be shown on the display.
In exemplary embodiments, the device includes both a touch-screen and an on-board camera. The camera is used for acquiring an image of the patient's dental arch, and the processor is further programmed to allow the user to scale the image by matching a scaling symbol generated by the processor and visible on the display screen with a size registration symbol on the image.
In still further specific embodiments, the device having the on-board camera and the scaling symbol on the display may be combined with a wax bite plate having the size registration symbol visible on the surface thereof. In this way, the camera device will acquire an image of the size registration symbol at the same time the image of the dental arch is acquired. When the image of the wax bite plate is displayed on the device display, the user can match the processor-generated scaling symbol with the apparent size of the registration symbol on the image, allowing the processor to determine the size ratio of the apparent image with the actual anatomic inventions. In specific embodiments, the size registration symbol may be a triangle and the user may increase and decrease the size of a triangular scaling symbol on the display screen until the triangular sizes match.
In other system embodiments, when the display device does not include an on-board camera, the system may comprise a separate intraoral camera configured to acquire a scaled image of the patient's dental arch and deliver said image to said display device and processor. Alternatively, the system may utilize a pressure-sensitive bite plate configured to generate an electronic scaled image of the patient's oral arch when the patient bites down on the plate.
An oral appliance 10 designed to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is illustrated in
Selecting the proper mouthpiece size is based on the patient's dental anatomy. In particular, an image of the dental arch is obtained by any one of several techniques, and the image is uploaded to a processor which is programmed to measure the dental arch and determine the appliance size based on those measurements. In an exemplary embodiment, the program is provided in an application which can be uploaded to a hand-held device, such as a smart phone or a tablet, having an on-board camera that can be used to obtain the image, typically from a wax bite plate. A touch screen on the hand-held device can then be used to scale the image and mark key anatomic locations on the image. With that information, the application can select the best fit appliance size for the patient.
While the hand-held device with a touch screen is convenient and will often be used, the present invention can also use laptop and other computers with touch screens and without touch screen where, in the latter case, the dental arch image may be scaled and marked using a cursor. Moreover, the dental arch image can be obtained by other means, such as using an intra-oral or other camera to capture the image or using a pressure-sensitive bite plate to electronically (non-optically) capture the image.
The mouthpiece sizing program or application uses two dimensions taken from the image of the patient's dental arch. Referring to
For optimum performance, the hand-held device should allow for scaling of an image and should include a camera to acquire an image. The following specific instructions are provided for the Apple iPhone® 4 and 4s and the Apple iTouch®, but it will be appreciated that other smart phones and tablets could also be used.
Referring to
When ready to size the oral device or mouthpiece, a home screen (
The hand-held device uses the internal camera to acquire and input an image of a patient's dental arch (bite registration) from a wax bite plate (
Next, the captured image needs to be scaled properly. The wax bite plate contains an equilateral triangle 18 stamped on its surface (
Next, the program or application asks the user to identify the locations of the first and second molar gap on both sides of the dental arch 18. A “T” 24 appears on the mobile device screen (
The final step of the sizing process is locating the front edge of the patient's incisors. Move an on-screen arc 26 up and down until it rests at the front edge of the incisors (
The program or application now presents a match or result screen with the properly identified mouthpiece size (
As an alternative to the use of an on-board camera as just described, a scaled image of the patient's dental arch can be obtained directly using a pressure-sensitive bite plate 32, as shown in
A scaled image could also be obtained using an intra-oral camera 40 (
Other integrated devices intended for performing the methods of the present invention are illustrated in
As shown in
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/647,446, filed on May 15, 2012, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2219559 | Lentz | Oct 1940 | A |
3132647 | Corniello | May 1964 | A |
3898736 | Bergersen | Aug 1975 | A |
4169473 | Samelson | Oct 1979 | A |
4304227 | Samelson | Dec 1981 | A |
4669459 | Spiewak et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4676240 | Gardy | Jun 1987 | A |
4997368 | Mayer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5385155 | Kittelsen | Jan 1995 | A |
5465734 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5915385 | Hakimi | Jun 1999 | A |
5957133 | Hart | Sep 1999 | A |
6089868 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6467484 | De Voss | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494209 | Kulick | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6736637 | Bond | May 2004 | B2 |
6877513 | Scarberry et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6955172 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976491 | D'Agosto | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7073505 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073506 | Robertson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7182082 | Hoffrichter | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7328698 | Scarberry et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
8122889 | Vaska et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8402973 | Podmore et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010023413 | Fukuma | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030138752 | Bergersen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050166928 | Jiang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050166929 | Jiang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050236003 | Meader | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060096600 | Witt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060282010 | Martin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070254247 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277818 | Chen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080071559 | Arrasvuori | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080188947 | Sanders | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210244 | Keropian | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216843 | Jiang | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221697 | Graser | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090120446 | Vaska et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120447 | Vaska et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123886 | Vaska | May 2009 | A1 |
20100037166 | Chandrasekar et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100159414 | Crucs | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110195373 | Waugh | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120037166 | Podmore et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130130872 | Benne et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2008083857 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Molinari, G. E. (Oct. 2006). September is a good time to keep smiling. Michigan Chronicle Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/390123617?accountid=14753. |
International search report and written opinion dated Sep. 23, 2013 for PCT/US2013/040152. |
Cartwright et al., “The effects of a non-surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: the tongue retaining device;” JAMA, Aug. 1982; 248(6): 705-709. |
Hoffstein, “Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing,” Sleep Breath, 2007 Mani 1(1):1-22. |
International search report and written opinion dated Nov. 22, 2011 for PCT/US2011/043574. |
Notice of allowance dated Feb. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,375. |
Office action dated Oct. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,375. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140088437 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61647446 | May 2012 | US |