Screens are commonly used in tubular systems to separate particulate from fluids. Such systems are employed in the downhole completion industry to separate sand and other particulate from hydrocarbons such as oil, water and natural gas, for example. Communication across these screens can be difficult depending upon the construction of the screen itself. Screen devices that simplify communication thereacross are welcomed in the art.
Disclosed herein is a screen device that includes a foam body having a passageway that extends longitudinally through the foam body. The foam body has an open cell structure such that at least two surfaces of the foam body are in fluidic communication with one another through the foam body.
Further disclosed is a downhole screen including a tubular having a wall with perforations therethrough and a foam body, having an open cell structure, surroundingly disposed at the tubular. The open cell structure provides fluidic communication between an outer surface of the foam body and an inside of the tubular. The foam body also has a conduit extending longitudinally therethrough.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
The conduit 26 provides an unobstructed passageway from a first end 42 of the screen device 10 to a second end 46 of the screen device 10. As mentioned above, the walls 28B of the conduit 26 may be permeable so that fluid is able to pass therethrough in either direction between the open cell structured foam 31 and the conduit 26. An embodiment wherein the walls 28B are permeable permits treatments therethrough. For example, chemical injection for treating the open cell structured foam 31 or the earth formation 12, such as for acid treatments or corrosion inhibitor treatments.
The anticipated treatments and environmental conditions in which the screen device 10 will be operational will influence materials used to construct the foam body 13. Additional considerations include whether or not the foam body 13 needs to be deformable or not. As such, materials contemplated for the foam body 13 include resins, polyolefins, polyurethanes, polyvinylchlorides, metals, ceramics and combinations thereof.
Regardless of the material of the foam body 13, running the line 22 through the conduit 26 provides a means of communicating through the screen device 10. The line 22 can be one or more of several lines commonly used in downhole completion applications, such as, a hydraulic line, an electric line, a fiber optic cable and a chemical injection line, for example.
Referring to
Referring to
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1352493 | Wolffgram | Sep 1920 | A |
3371793 | Fowler | Mar 1968 | A |
4260096 | Samarynov et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4924568 | Sato et al. | May 1990 | A |
5032622 | Herrington et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5049591 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5098776 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5501832 | Adams | Mar 1996 | A |
5503784 | Balk | Apr 1996 | A |
5520758 | Kelman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533370 | Kuroda et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5565049 | Simmons et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5770016 | Greve | Jun 1998 | A |
5964798 | Imran | Oct 1999 | A |
6281289 | Maugans et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6321503 | Warren | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6472449 | Heinemann et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6521555 | Bodaghi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6560942 | Warren et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6583194 | Sendijarevic | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6817441 | Murakami et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827764 | Springett et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6983796 | Bayne et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986855 | Hood et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7048048 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7134501 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155872 | Francom | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7234518 | Smith | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7644773 | Richard | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7712529 | Dusterhoft et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7828055 | Willauer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20050056425 | Grigsby et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050205263 | Richard | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080006413 | Le Gloahec et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080296020 | Willauer | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004099560 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2011/031768; Mailed Sep. 30, 2011; Korean Intellectual Property Office. |
J. Heiland et al., “The Role of the Annular Gap in Expandable Sand Screen Completions”; Society of Petroleum Engineers; SPE Paper No. 86463; Feb. 18-20, 2004. |
Lorrie A. Krebs et al., “Pitting Resistance of Nitinol Stents Before and After Implantation”; NACE International; Paper No. 09461; Corrosion Conference and Expo Mar. 22-26, 2009. |
G. Scott Lester et al., “Field Application of a New Cleanable and Damage Tolerant Downhole Screen,”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 30132, May 15, 1995. |
Jiaxing (Jason) Ren et al., “Studying the Effect of Chemical Aging on the Properties of a Shape Memory Material”, Offshore Technology Conference, Paper No. OTC 21317; May 2, 2011. |
Witold M. Sokolowski et al., “Cold hibernated elastic memor(yC HEM) self-deployable structures”; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Mar. 1, 1999. |
SPE Distinguished Lecturer Series[online]; retrieved on Sep. 25, 2009]; retrieved from the internet at: http://www.spe.org/spe-site/spe/spe/events/dl/Ott.pdf. |
C.F. Williams et al., “A New Sizing Criterion for Conformable and Nonconformable Sand Screens Based on Uniform Pore Structures”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 98235; Feb. 15-17, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110247801 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |