This application is a 371 of PCT/SE04/01352 filed 21 Sep. 2004.
The present invention relates to a screening apparatus for screening pulp suspensions, comprising a housing, a tubular screen basket dividing the interior of the housing into a central chamber and an outer substantially annular chamber, an inlet member for supplying a suspension to be screened into either the central chamber or the outer chamber, an accept outlet member for discharging a developed accept fraction of the suspension that has passed through the screen basket, and a reject outlet member for discharging a developed reject fraction of the suspension. The present invention also relates to a rotor arranged in the housing for providing pressure and suction pulses in the suspension to be screened along the screen basket. The apparatus of the present invention further relates to a dilution liquid header in the housing for supplying dilution liquid to counteract thickening of the suspension during operation. The header forms a tubular channel dividing the basket into at least two parts and extending at least substantially around the screen basket. At least one dilution liquid supply conduit is provided for supplying dilution liquid from outside the housing to the channel of the header. The header further is provided with a plurality of ejection nozzles for ejecting dilution liquid from the tubular channel.
The present invention also relates to a screen basket suited for use in the above-described screening apparatus.
Apparatus of the type described above in the form a multi-stage screening apparatus is disclosed in Swedish Patent No. 524,527. The tubular channel of the dilution liquid header of this multi-stage apparatus has a constant cross-sectional area and the ejection nozzles of the header are identical.
A problem with this design of the prior header according to Swedish Patent No. 524,527 is that the dilution liquid flow rates in the respective ejection nozzles can vary considerably, so that the flow rates in the ejection nozzles located more downstream along the tubular channel are higher than the flow rates in the nozzles located more upstream. The varying flow rates in the different ejection nozzles result in a disadvantageous uneven distribution of the dilution liquid to the suspension.
One potential solution to this problem would be to provide uniform flow rates in the ejection nozzles of the prior header with constant cross-sectional area of the tubular channel and this could be done by designing all ejection nozzles with different sizes, so that the more upstream nozzles are wider, whereas the more downstream nozzles are narrower. A disadvantage to this solution, however, is that in practice it is very difficult to properly size the different ejection nozzles, especially when there is a great number of ejection nozzles. Besides, even if a series of ejection nozzle sizes has been correctly calculated this series is only valid for a given main dilution liquid stream supplied to the tubular channel of the header. In consequence, the distribution of dilution liquid through the ejection nozzles would not be uniform for other main liquid streams that exceed or are less than said given main liquid stream.
Another potential solution to the above problem is by providing uniform flow rates in the ejection nozzles of the prior header could be to design the tubular channel tapering in the direction of the dilution liquid stream, so that the static pressures in the dilution liquid at the entrances of the ejection nozzles are equal, which would result in equal flow rates in the ejection nozzles. However, it is complicated to design such a header, because to achieve the desired equal static pressure states at the different ejection nozzles the degree of taper of the tubular channel must be varied along the channel. In addition, the correct taper of the channel is dependent on the friction between the dilution liquid and the wall surface of the tubular channel.
One of the objects of the present invention is to improve the screening apparatus according to Swedish Patent No. 524,527, so that the header uniformly distributes dilution liquid to the suspension to be screened.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a screen basket for use in the improved screening apparatus of the present invention, and also for replacing screen baskets in existing screening apparatuses commercially operated.
In accordance with the present invention, these and other objects are realized by a screening apparatus of the type described above initially characterized in that each ejection nozzle includes at least two channel sections, an entrance channel section that opens into the channel of the header and an exit channel section downstream of the entrance channel section, the entrance channel section being substantially wider than the exit channel section. As a result, the wider entrance channel section forms a volume in which the velocity of the main stream in the channel is substantially decreased, so that when part streams of the main stream are diverged into the entrance channel sections, dynamic pressure of the main stream is converted into substantially equal static pressures in the entrance channel sections. These static pressures feed the narrow exit channel sections with liquid streams of substantially equal flow rates.
The entrance channel section of each ejection nozzle may have a volume large enough to house an eddy current created in the stream of dilution liquid diverging from the tubular channel into the entrance section of the ejection nozzle, when dilution liquid is supplied by the header. As a result, an eddy current is prevented from being created in the exit channel section, which is beneficial with respect to reducing the impact of existing fluctuating counter pressure at the discharge side of the ejection nozzles. If an eddy current were created in the exit channel section it would be much easier for a counter pressure to move material from the discharge side of the injection nozzles back into the channel of the header. As an alternative, the entrance channel section of each ejection nozzle may have a volume large enough to prevent the creation of an eddy current in the stream of dilution liquid in the exit channel section, when dilution liquid is supplied by the header, i.e. without the aid of creating an eddy current in the entrance channel section.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the volume of the entrance channel section should be from 0.2 to 2 times the volume of the exit channel section.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the entrance channel section of each ejection nozzle has a width that is 25 to 100% wider than that of the exit channel section and the length of the entrance channel section of each ejection nozzle is 5 to 50% of the width of the entrance channel section.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, the ejection nozzles are identical and the tubular channel of the header has a constant cross-sectional area along its length. Each ejection nozzle channel may have an elongated or circular cross-section.
In accordance with the present invention, other objects of the present invention are realized by a screen basket for screening pulp suspensions, comprising a tubular mantle wall provided with screen apertures, and a dilution liquid header on the mantle wall forming a tubular channel for dilution liquid extending at least substantially around the mantle wall, the header being provided with a plurality of ejection nozzles, The screen basket is characterised in that each ejection nozzle forms a channel including at least two channel sections, an entrance channel section that opens into the channel of the header and an exit channel section downstream of the entrance channel section, the entrance channel section being substantially wider than the exit channel section.
The screen basket of the present invention may be designed similar to the screen basket of the above-described screening apparatus of the present invention.
The present invention will be more fully appreciated with reference to the following detailed description, in which reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which
Referring to the drawings, identical or corresponding elements shown in the figures are denoted with the same reference numerals.
With reference to
Each exit channel section 62 may have a circular cross-section with a diameter in the range of from 2 to 20 mm, preferably from 5 to 15 mm. Alternatively, each exit channel section 62 may take the shape of a slot with a width in the range of from 2 to 20 mm, and preferably from 5 to 15 mm.
The screen basket 8 described above is particularly suited for replacing traditional single stage screen baskets in old screening apparatuses. By utilizing the existing accept outlet member to connect the dilution liquid supply conduit there is no need for reconstructing the housing of the old apparatus.
In operation, a fiber suspension to be screened is fed via the inlet member 4 to the screen basket 8 at the upper side 12 thereof. In the screen basket 8 the suspension is screened along section 40 of the mantle wall 30, so that a primary accept fraction passes through the screen apertures of the mantle wall 30 while a primary reject fraction develops inside the screen basket 8. The primary reject fraction is diluted by a controlled flow of dilution liquid sprayed through the ejection nozzles 50. The diluted primary reject fraction is screened along section 42 of the mantle wall 30, so that a secondary accept fraction passes through the mantle wall 30 while a secondary reject fraction develops inside the screen basket 8 and then is discharged from the screen basket 8 through the reject outlet member 20. The primary and secondary accept fractions are combined and discharged through the accept outlet member 16.
The flow of dilution liquid through the ejection nozzles 50 is controlled in response to the consistency and flow of the suspension being fed to the screen basket 8 and the consistency and flow of the secondary reject fraction being discharged from the screen basket 8, so that the consistency of the primary reject fraction entering section 42 of the mantle wall 30 becomes substantially the same as the consistency of the suspension being fed into the screen basket 8.
As an alternative to the embodiments of
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0302932 | Nov 2003 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2004/001352 | 9/21/2004 | WO | 00 | 3/22/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/045128 | 5/19/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4717471 | Winkler | Jan 1988 | A |
4986900 | Mason | Jan 1991 | A |
6241102 | Lindberg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6290067 | Bergdahl et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6571957 | Doelle et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585116 | Doelle et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6679384 | Serres et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
39 40 334 | Jun 1991 | DE |
41 21 896 | Jan 1993 | DE |
0 905 309 | Nov 2001 | EP |
0 958 431 | Jan 2002 | EP |
2 613 390 | Oct 1988 | FR |
506 602 | Jan 1998 | SE |
510 967 | Jul 1999 | SE |
513 793 | Jun 2000 | SE |
524 527 | Aug 2004 | SE |
WO-9304797 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO-9307334 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO-9928549 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-0050690 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-03104549 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070246181 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |