Screening of inert solids from a low-yield wastewater treatment process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7569147
  • Patent Number
    7,569,147
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 31, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 4, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
A method for removing inert solids from low-yield wastewater treatment processes. The method includes combining wastewater with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor, separating the mixed liquor into a clear effluent and activated sludge, returning a first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor, treating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor, and employing a screening device within the wastewater treatment process to remove inert solids.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an activated sludge wastewater treatment process. More particularly, the invention relates to the removal of inert solids from a low-yield wastewater treatment process.


BACKGROUND

Wastewater pollutants are typically classified as either organic pollutants or inorganic pollutants. Organic pollutants generally refer to those substances that contain carbon and can be burned. Organic pollutants are often removed by biological wastewater treatment, that is, by cultivating bacteria to convert most of the organic pollutants in the wastewater to carbon dioxide, water, and biomass. Any biomass produced in the process is then separated from the treated wastewater and disposed of by various means, such as landfilling, incineration or application to topsoil as fertilizer. There also exists a class of organic pollutants which are refractory, that is, slow or difficult to biodegrade. Some well-known examples include plastics and hair.


Inorganic pollutants are generally not biologically degradable. Inorganic pollutants are often referred to as minerals. Some well-known examples include clays, grit and sand. In a conventional wastewater treatment plant, inorganic pollutants must be removed from the plant, or they will accumulate in the processing tanks, diminishing the actual volume within the tanks available for biological treatment. For the purposes of this disclosure, inorganic pollutants and refractory organic pollutants will be referred to as “inert solids.” Biologically degradable organic pollutants will be referred to as “readily degradable solids.”


A conventional activated sludge wastewater treatment process is shown in FIG. 1. The process generally involves cultivating within an aeration reactor a “mixed liquor” of bacterial cells suspended in wastewater. The bacterial cells are only slightly denser than water, and so are easily maintained in suspension. Solid-liquid separators, such as large quiescent clarifiers or membrane-based systems, are typically used to separate the cultivated mixed liquor into bacterial cell mass, referred to as activated sludge, and a clear effluent. The clear effluent may be removed from the waste stream and discharged into a local waterway. At least a portion of the activated sludge may be recycled to the aeration reactor as return activated sludge (RAS). The RAS helps maintain a sufficient concentration of bacterial cells in the aeration reactor for effective cleaning of the incoming wastewater. Since conversion of the readily degradable solids creates additional bacterial cell mass within the wastewater treatment system, a portion of the activated sludge is typically removed from the plant as waste activated sludge (WAS) to maintain the bacterial cell mass within an acceptable performance range.


In general, the proportion of inert solids to readily degradable solids in WAS is similar to that in the mixed liquor in the aeration reactor. In a traditional activated sludge plant, the WAS flow rate is high enough that the concentration of inert solids accumulated within the wastewater treatment plant is relatively low. However, newer processes have been designed that minimize the production of biosludge. These low-yield (low-biosludge-production) wastewater treatment processes significantly reduce WAS, limiting the rate at which inert solids are removed from a plant. Since WAS has typically been the only pathway by which inert solids are removed from a wastewater treatment plant, it follows that inert solids will accumulate within a low-yield wastewater treatment plant unless the inert solids are removed by some other means.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, the invention provides a wastewater treatment method comprising combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor, separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge, passing a first portion of activated sludge through a screening device to remove at least a portion of the inert solids and returning the screened first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor, and treating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.


In another embodiment the invention provides a wastewater treatment method comprising combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor, separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge, returning a first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor through one of a screening device that removes at least a portion of the inert solids from the activated sludge, a screen bypass line that discharges activated sludge directly into the mainstream reactor, or a combination of both, and treating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.


In a further embodiment, the invention provides a wastewater treatment method comprising combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor, separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge, passing a first portion of activated sludge through a rotary drum to remove at least a portion of the inert solids and returning the screened first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor, and treating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.


In yet a further embodiment, the invention provides a wastewater treatment method comprising combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor, passing at least a portion of the mixed liquor through a screening device to remove at least a portion of the inert solids, separating the screened mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge, recycling a first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor, and treating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.


In still another embodiment, the invention provides a wastewater treatment method comprising combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor, separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge, and passing at least a portion of activated sludge through a screening device having screen openings from about 10 μm to about 2,500 μm to remove at least a portion of the inert solids and returning the screened portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor, wherein the wastewater treatment method is a low-yield process.


Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a traditional activated sludge wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a first embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 3 is a size distribution chart showing the average dimensions for suspended solids typically found in wastewater.



FIG. 4 illustrates the effect of wastewater screening where the screen has an opening size of 250 μm.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a second embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a third embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a fourth embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a fifth embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a sixth embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a seventh embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 11 is a schematic view of the rotary drum screen shown in FIG. 10



FIG. 12 is a schematic view of an eighth embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 13 is a schematic view of a ninth embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.



FIG. 14 is a schematic view of a tenth embodiment of an improved wastewater treatment system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the term “mounted” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mountings. The word “conduit” is used broadly to represent a pathway, and is not meant to be restricted to any particular physical or mechanical device.


The invention discloses low-yield wastewater treatment processes comprising a sidestream bioreactor and a means for removing inert solids. The invention is particularly suited to wastewater treatment plants having a significant influx of inert solids.



FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic view of an improved wastewater treatment system embodying the invention. The invention employs a mainstream reactor 10 in combination with a sidestream bioreactor 12 to minimize the WAS generated by the treatment process. A screening device 14 removes inert solids from the system.


As shown in FIG. 2, wastewater comprising organic and inorganic pollutants is transported by conduit 16 to the mainstream reactor 10 where it is mixed with a bacterial-laden sludge, or activated sludge, to form a mixed liquor. The mainstream reactor 10 subjects the mixed liquor to one or more biological growth conditions that cultivate microorganisms to convert readily degradable solids into carbon dioxide, water and bacterial cell mass. The mainstream reactor 10 typically comprises one or more reactor zones, each of which operates under aerobic, anoxic or anaerobic conditions. Within an aerobic zone, the mixed liquor contains sufficient dissolved O2 to cultivate microorganisms that undergo aerobic metabolic processes. Within an anoxic zone, the mixed liquor typically contains no measurable dissolved O2 but does contain oxygen in the form of nitrates and/or nitrites. An anoxic zone will cultivate those organisms that can utilize the oxygen tied up within the nitrates and/or nitrites to carry out their metabolic processes. An anaerobic zone contains no measurable oxygen and will cultivate those organisms that do not require oxygen to carry out their metabolic processes. Although the invention should in no way be limited by scientific theory, it is believed that aerobic zone microorganisms typically oxidize readily degradable solids and simultaneously absorb and store phosphates. Anoxic zone microorganisms typically use nitrate, and optionally oxygen (aerated anoxic), to oxidize readily degradable solids. The anaerobic zone microorganisms typically convert carbon compounds using energy derived from hydrolysis.


The biological populations within the mainstream reactor 10 can be adjusted to accommodate seasonal variations in wastewater and/or treat specific pollutants by varying the number and sequence of reactor zones. The mainstream reactor 10 can be divided into a finite number of discrete zones defined by distinct boundaries. In one embodiment, the mainstream reactor 10 includes three reactor zones, where the mixed liquor is first subjected to an aerobic zone, then subjected to an anoxic zone, and finally subjected to an aerobic zone. In another embodiment, the mainstream reactor 10 includes two reactor zones, where the mixed liquor is first subjected to an aerobic zone followed by an anaerobic zone. In a further embodiment, the mainstream reactor 10 includes four reactor zones, where the mixed liquor is first subjected to an anaerobic zone, followed by an anoxic zone and two aerobic zones. The listed embodiments serve only as examples. It should be understood that the mainstream reactor 10 can comprise two or more reactor zones arranged in any sequence. Furthermore, the mainstream reactor 10 can run as a batch process or a continuous process.


The mainstream reactor 10 can also have a long plug flow design where there are no discrete boundaries and the conditions change gradually over the length of the tank. In one embodiment, the tank environment gradually transitions from an aerobic environment in the upstream end to an anoxic environment in the downstream end. In an alternative embodiment, the tank environment gradually transitions from an anaerobic environment in the upstream end, to an anoxic environment in the middle, and to an aerobic environment in the downstream end.


From the mainstream reactor 10, the mixed liquor is transferred by conduit 18 to a solid-liquid separator 20 where solids are separated from the mixed liquor, leaving behind an activated sludge and a clarified effluent. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the mainstream reactor 10 and solid-liquid separator 20 are separate units. In an alternative embodiment, the mainstream reactor 10 and solid-liquid separator 20 can be combined into a sequencing batch reactor.


The solid-liquid separator 20 is any device that separates solids from liquids by, for example, gravity, differential settling velocity, or size-exclusion. Examples of solid-liquid separators include settling ponds, clarifiers, hydrocyclones, centrifuges, and membrane filters or separators. The clear effluent is removed by conduit 22 and can be disinfected and then discharged into a local waterway. The remaining activated sludge comprises live bacteria, expired bacteria, and inert solids.


A portion of the activated sludge from the solid-liquid separator 20 is recycled to the mainstream reactor 10 by conduits 24 and 26. The recycled sludge, also known as return activated sludge (RAS), maintains a sufficient concentration of bacterial cells in the mainstream reactor 10 to effectively treat the incoming wastewater. A portion of the activated sludge may also be transferred directly by conduit 28, and/or indirectly by conduits 24, 25 and 28, to the sidestream bioreactor 12 where a second bacteria population is cultivated under one or more growth conditions to facilitate the decomposition of readily degradable solids in the wastewater treatment process. A suitable sidestream bioreactor 12 is described below and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,660,163 issued to Miklos, which is hereby fully incorporated by reference.


The bacteria population within the activated sludge typically comprises one or more classes of bacteria. Such classes of bacteria include, but are not limited to, obligate aerobes, facultative aerobes, nitrifiers, obligate anaerobes, and facultative anaerobes. Each bacteria performs a certain function. For example, some bacteria convert particulate biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) into soluble BOD for utilization, some reduce high solids yield organisms, and some improve nitrification/denitrification efficiency. Each bacteria also thrives within a particular range of conditions. Aerobic bacteria thrive in an oxygen-rich environment, anaerobic bacteria thrive in an oxygen-depleted environment, and facultative bacteria can thrive in both environments. Bacteria within a population may be selectively activated by changing the growth conditions to which the population is subjected. Desired growth conditions may be achieved by effecting a selected order of aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic conditions for varied lengths of time and repetitively controlling those conditions by measurement and reproduction of the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR), and/or specific nitrogen uptake rate (SNUR). Therefore, within the sidestream bioreactor 12 it is possible to treat more than one component in the wastewater by selectively varying the conditions of the sidestream bioreactor 12 to sequentially activate the individual types of bacteria.


In one embodiment, the sidestream bioreactor 12 is run under anaerobic conditions to promote the growth and activity of anaerobic bacteria. Such bacteria can include obligate anaerobes and/or facultative anaerobes. Under anaerobic conditions, the bacteria that accumulated quantities of phosphorus in excess of that required for simple cell growth and reproduction during aeration, now take up and store simple carbon compounds, using energy derived from the hydrolysis and release of phosphates. When the activated sludge is eventually returned to the mainstream reactor 10, these bacteria are able to metabolize the absorbed carbon compounds in an aerobic zone.


In a second embodiment, the sidestream bioreactor 12 is a sequencing facultative digester (SFD) favoring a low solids yield. Within an SFD, the activated sludge comprising facultative bacteria is subjected to a sequence of anaerobic and anoxic conditions that contribute to breaking down the readily degradable solids in the wastewater treatment process. The SFD can operate as a batch process, where the entire contents of the SFD are under anoxic conditions or anaerobic conditions at a single moment. Alternatively, the SFD can operate as a continuous process where the SFD is divided into separate compartments, each compartment operating under anoxic or anaerobic conditions. The sequence of conditions may take any order. After processing in the sidestream bioreactor 12, the activated sludge may be recycled to the mainstream reactor 10 as interchange activated sludge (IAS) by conduit 30.


Although each of the activated sludge pathways has been described individually, it should be recognized that the activated sludge may be entirely diverted along one of the pathways or alternatively split along both pathways. Additionally, the selected pathways and the amount of the activated sludge sent to each pathway may be adjusted as needed to most efficiently and effectively treat the wastewater entering the treatment plant at any given time. In one embodiment, about 90% of the activated sludge from the solid-liquid separator 20 is recycled to the mainstream reactor 10 and about 10% of the activated sludge from the solid-liquid separator 20 is passed through the sidestream bioreactor 12. In an additional embodiment, about 80% of the activated sludge from the solid-liquid separator 20 is recycled to the mainstream reactor 10 and about 20% of the activated sludge from the solid-liquid separator 20 is passed through the sidestream bioreactor 12.


The RAS recycled to the mainstream reactor 10 is passed through a screening device 14 to remove inert solids. As shown in FIG. 3, a variety of organic and inorganic pollutants may be present in the wastewater. Readily degradable solids will be decomposed within the treatment plant. However, inert solids will build up in the system and effect plant efficiency if not properly removed. It has been found that screening the activated sludge will remove most inert solids from the plant while allowing the bacterial cell mass to be recycled within the plant. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, a screen having an opening size of 250 μm may remove large inorganic solids but permit small inorganic solids and bacterial cell mass (biomass) to pass through. As shown in FIG. 2, the inert solids trapped by the screening device 14 are typically removed from the plant by conduit 32 and sent out for proper disposal.


The screening device 14 may comprise any screen or media filter having the capability of filtering inert solids from a wastewater stream while allowing the majority of the bacterial cell mass to pass through. Hereinafter, screens and media filters may be used interchangeably when describing the screening device 14. Screen openings (or interstitial spaces in the case of media filters) are typically at least about 10 μm, more particularly at least about 150 μm, and even more particularly at least about 250 μm. Screen openings are typically smaller than about 6,000 μm, more particularly smaller than about 2,500 μm, and even more particularly smaller than about 500 μm. This includes embodiments having screen openings in the range of about 10 μm to about 6,000 μm, further includes embodiments having screen openings in the range of about 10 μm to about 2,500 μm, and still further includes embodiments having screen openings in the range of about 250 μm to about 500 μm. In one embodiment, the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than 100 μm. In another embodiment, the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 50 μm.


Although screens are particularly efficient at removing pollutants having average particle diameters greater than the screen openings, it has also been found that screens can capture fine particles which are substantially smaller than the screen openings. The larger particles can form a “mat” or coating which partially blocks the screen openings, effectively reducing their size. Therefore, the screening device 14 may remove a significant number of pollutants having particle dimensions less than the size of the screen openings. In some embodiments, the screening device 14 having a screen opening size of greater than about 100 μm may remove inert solids having average particle diameters smaller than about 100 μm. In other embodiments, the screening device 14 having a screen opening size of greater than about 50 μm may remove inert solids having average particle diameters smaller than about 50 μm.


Suitable screening devices 14 may comprise drum screens. Drum screens may include mesh screening elements. More preferably, the drum screens include wedgewire screening elements. Suitable commercial screening devices include, but are not limited to, BU Milliscreen from Contra Shear™ (Aukland, New Zealand), Rotoscreen™ Escalating Fine Channel Screen from Parkson Corporation (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.), Hycor® Rotoshear® also from Parkson Corporation, Huber Brand Screens (Wiltshire SN14 6NQ, United Kingdom), and a modified Microscreen™ drum screen which may use modular panels of molded plastic mesh from USFilter (Waukesha, Wis.). Other suitable screening devices 14 may include media filters, such as sand filters.


It should be recognized by one skilled in the art that the screening device 14 may comprise a single screen or multiple screens arranged in series or parallel. Multiple screens within a single screening device 14 may have the same size openings, different size openings, or combinations thereof. The screening device 14 may be positioned at various locations throughout the treatment plant. In the embodiment represented by FIG. 2, the screening device 14 filters RAS recycled to the mainstream reactor 10 by conduits 24 and 26. Other non-limiting arrangements are discussed below.


Although the screening device removes a significant portion of inert solids in a wastewater stream, it does not remove 100% of the inert solids. As a result, inert solids may build up in the processing tanks over time. Therefore, conduit 33 provides a means for periodic wasting of the sludge to prevent the build-up of inert solids in the wastewater treatment system. The period between sludge wasting will depend upon a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, the nature of the incoming wastewater, the treatment process and the time of year. For example, a wastewater treatment plant may waste sludge every month, every six months or once a year. Additionally, a wastewater treatment plant may waste all of the sludge or just a portion of the sludge at any given time. Although the location of wasting in FIG. 2 is directly after the solid-liquid separator 20, it should be understood that wasting may occur at any point in the wastewater treatment process.



FIG. 5 represents a variation on the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2. Under certain conditions, the concentration of solids in the activated sludge may exceed optimal screening conditions. In such cases, it may be beneficial to dilute the activated sludge prior to sending it through the screening device 14. As shown in FIG. 5, a separator bypass line 34 can be used to remove at least a portion of the mixed liquor from the mainstream reactor 10 for the purpose of diluting RAS upstream of the screening device 14. In one exemplary embodiment, mixed liquor having a suspended solids concentration of about 4,000 mg/l to about 6,000 mg/l is diverted through the separator bypass line 34 to dilute the RAS having a solids concentration of about 15,000 mg/l or more.



FIG. 6 represents another variation on the embodiment of FIG. 2 where return process water may be diverted to the screen 14 to help facilitate the passage of biomass through the screen and ultimately enhance separation of inert solids from the activated sludge. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 6, clear effluent from the solid-liquid separator 20 is diverted continuously, or intermittently, via conduit 23 to the screening device 14 where it is mixed with activated sludge prior to its passage through the screening device 14.



FIG. 7 represents an additional variation on the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2 where at least a portion of the RAS may be diverted around the screening device 14 by conduit 36.



FIG. 8 represents a variation on the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2 that is designed to enhance performance of the screening device 14. Screened inert solids are recycled by conduit 38 upstream of the screening device 14 to increase the concentration of larger inert solids passing through the screening device 14. This arrangement can result in an increase in screen capture efficiency, analogous to the use of a precoat material, resulting in the capture of inert solids that are particularly fine.



FIG. 9 represents a further variation on the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2. At least a portion of the RAS from the solid-liquid separator 20 may be routed through conduit 25 to the screening device 14. Screened inert solids are removed from the screening device 14 along conduit 40. Screened RAS is returned to the mainstream reactor by conduit 42. Alternatively or simultaneously, at least a portion of the RAS may be diverted along screen bypass line 44 by opening a valve 46. The screen bypass line 44 allows recycled sludge to discharge directly back into the mainstream reactor 10 without passing through the screening device 14. In one embodiment, the screening device 14 is mounted higher than the mainstream reactor 10 and the screen bypass line 44 is mounted lower than the screening device 14.



FIG. 10 represents yet a further variation on the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2. The screening device 14 comprises a rotary drum screen 50, as shown in FIG. 11. The rotary drum screen 50 has a top surface 52, a bottom surface 54, a discharge end 56, a feed end 58 and a central axis 59. In the embodiment shown, the top surface 52 and bottom surface 54 are sloped downward from the discharge end 56 to the feed end 58. In another embodiment, the top surface 52 and bottom surface 54 may be horizontal. RAS enters the rotary drum screen 50 along conduit 25. Angled vanes 60 gradually transport screened inert solids uphill toward the discharge end 56 of the rotary drum screen 50. The inert solids are removed from the rotary drum screen 50 by conduit 40. Screened RAS is recycled to the mainstream reactor by conduit 42. Located at the feed end 58 is a dam 62 of a sufficient height so that when the rotary drum screen 50 becomes blinded, any slurry which the rotary drum screen 50 cannot handle automatically spills backwards over the dam 62 and is recycled by conduit 48 to an appropriate location, such as the mainstream reactor 10. Although the rotary drum screen in FIG. 11 is cylindrical, one skilled in the art will recognize that rotary drums can have other shapes, including conical. In one embodiment, the screening device 14 is mounted higher than the mainstream reactor 10.



FIG. 12 illustrates an embodiment where the screening device 14 is located upstream of the solid-liquid separator 20. Mixed liquor from the mainstream reactor 10 is transferred by conduit 17 to the screening device 14. Inert solids are removed from the screening device 14 by conduit 32. The screened mixed liquor is then transferred by conduit 19 to the solid-liquid separator 20.



FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment where the screening device 74 is an “in-situ” screen employed within the mainstream reactor 10. Wastewater enters the mainstream reactor 10 by conduit 16. In this particular embodiment, the mainstream reactor 10 comprises an aeration zone 70 and a digestion chamber 72. The screening device 74 is submerged in the mixed liquor of the digestion chamber 72. A separate conveying step, either continuous or intermittent, is used to remove the inert solids collected by the screening device 74. Screened inert solids are removed from the mainstream reactor 10 by conduit 32. The screened mixed liquor is transported to the solid-liquid separator 20 by conduit 18.



FIG. 14 is a further embodiment of FIG. 2 where the screening device 14 is a media-based filter. The media-based filter may include, but is not limited to, a continuous sand filter and a fine screen with a precoat. In the case of a continuous sand filter, the sand media size would be selected so that the critical dimension is the available passage diameter between adjacent particles in contact. For example, FIG. 14 illustrates how sand media of appropriate size can create an interstitial space that passes 250 μm particles.


It should be recognized by those skilled in the art that the screening device 14 may be located at positions in the treatment process not exemplified in the above embodiments. For example, in one embodiment, the screening device 14 may treat incoming wastewater at a location upstream of the mainstream reactor 10. In other embodiments, multiple screening devices may be located at more than one site within the wastewater treatment process.


The flow rate through the screening device 14 may vary but is typically about 5% to about 400% of the influent flow rate. For example, in a conventional treatment plant having a clarifier as a solid-liquid separator, the RAS rate may be about 25% to about 150% of the influent flow rate to the treatment plant, and the screen flow rate may be about 25% to about 100% of the RAS rate. In a treatment plant having a membrane as a solid-liquid separator, the screening rate may be greater than 100% of the influent flow rate to the plant. The flow rate may be substantially continuous; however, periodic interruptions in flow rate may be tolerated without a significant impact on performance. For example, the flow rate may be temporarily suspended to clean inert solids from the screening device 14. Methods of removing inert solids from the screening device 14 are well-known to those skilled in the art and typically vary with the type of screening device 14 employed.


In a representative implementation, a Contra Shear™ Model #20/40U wedgewire drum screen having a compactor at the discharge end was installed in the RAS pathway of a low-yield wastewater treatment process. The nominal wedgewire opening width was 250 μm, although actual measurements with a dial caliper gave values ranging from 200 μm to 400 μm. RAS upstream of the drum screen was found to have 14,700 mg/l total suspended solids (TSS) and 10,375 mg/l volatile suspended solids (VSS). RAS immediately downstream of the drum screen was found to have 13,100 mg/l TSS and 9,228 mg/l VSS. Screenings sent to the compactor were found to have 11% total solids (TS) and 86% volatile solids (VS). Screenings exiting the compactor were found to have 26% TS of which 88% was VS. When a sample of the screenings sent to the compactor where dropped into a graduated cylinder containing water, most of the sample sank to the bottom of the cylinder, suggesting most solids in the screenings were denser than water. However, it was observed that a significant amount of the screenings appeared to have a specific gravity near that of water.


Thus, the invention provides, among other things, a low-yield wastewater treatment process comprising a sidestream bioreactor and a screening device for removing inert solids. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A wastewater treatment method comprising: combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor;separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge;passing a first portion of activated sludge through a screening device to remove at least a portion of the inert solids and returning the screened first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor; andtreating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device comprises a single screen.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device comprises more than one screen arranged in one of series, parallel or combination thereof.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device comprises a drum screen.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the drum screen comprises wedgewire screening elements.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 100 μm.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 50 μm.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 10 μm to about 6,000 μm.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 10 μm to about 2,500 μm.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 250 μm to about 500 μm.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the sidestream bioreactor is a sequencing facultative digester.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein about 90% of the activated sludge in the solid-liquid separator is passed to the screening device and about 10% of the activated sludge is transferred to the sidestream bioreactor.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 further comprising diluting the first portion of activated sludge upstream of the screening device with mixed liquor from the mainstream reactor.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 further comprising diverting at least a fraction of the first portion of activated sludge around the screening device and returning the fraction to the mainstream reactor.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 further comprising adding at least a portion of the clarified effluent to the activated sludge prior to passage of the activated sludge through the screening device.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 further comprising concentrating the first portion of activated sludge upstream of the screening device with a portion of the inert solids removed by the screening device.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the screening device is a media-based filter.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein a membrane filter is used to separate the mixed liquor into the clarified effluent and the activated sludge.
  • 19. The method of claim 1 further comprising wasting at least a portion of the activated sludge.
  • 20. A wastewater treatment method comprising: combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor;separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge;returning a first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor through one of a screening device that removes at least a portion of the inert solids from the activated sludge, a screen bypass line that discharges activated sludge directly into the mainstream reactor, or a combination of both; andtreating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device is mounted higher than the mainstream reactor and the screen bypass line is mounted lower than the screening device.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, further comprising a valve on the screen bypass line to control the amount of the first portion of activated sludge that passes through the screening device.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device comprises a single screen.
  • 24. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device comprises more than one screen arranged in one of series, parallel or combination thereof.
  • 25. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device comprises a drum screen.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the drum screen comprises wedgewire screening elements.
  • 27. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 100 μm.
  • 28. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 50 μm.
  • 29. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 10 μm to about 6,000 μm.
  • 30. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 10 μm to about 2,500 μm.
  • 31. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 250 μm to about 500 μm.
  • 32. The method of claim 20, wherein the sidestream bioreactor is a sequencing facultative digester.
  • 33. The method of claim 20, wherein about 90% of the activated sludge is returned to the mainstream reactor as the first portion of activated sludge and about 10% of the activated sludge is returned to the mainstream reactor as the second portion of activated sludge.
  • 34. The method of claim 20, wherein the screening device is a media-based filter.
  • 35. The method of claim 20, wherein a membrane filter is used to separate the mixed liquor into the clarified effluent and the activated sludge.
  • 36. The method of claim 20 further comprising wasting at least of portion of the activated sludge.
  • 37. A wastewater treatment method comprising: combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria-laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor;separating the mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge;passing a first portion of activated sludge through a rotary drum to remove at least a portion of the inert solids and returning the screened first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor; andtreating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.
  • 38. The method of claim 37, wherein the rotary drum screen comprises a dam of sufficient height such that when the rotary drum screen becomes blinded, any first portion of activated sludge which the rotary drum screen cannot handle automatically spills over the dam and is recycled to the mainstream reactor.
  • 39. The method of claim 37, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 100 μm.
  • 40. The method of claim 37, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 50 μm.
  • 41. The method of claim 37, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 10 μm to about 2,500 μm.
  • 42. The method of claim 37, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 250 μm to about 500 μm.
  • 43. The method of claim 37, wherein the sidestream bioreactor is a sequencing facultative digester.
  • 44. The method of claim 37, wherein a membrane filter is used to separate the mixed liquor into the clarified effluent and the activated sludge.
  • 45. The method of claim 37, wherein the rotary drum screen is mounted higher than the mainstream reactor.
  • 46. The method of claim 37 further comprising wasting at least a portion of the activated sludge.
  • 47. A wastewater treatment method comprising: combining wastewater comprising readily degradable solids and inert solids with bacteria laden sludge in a mainstream reactor to form a mixed liquor;passing at least a portion of the mixed liquor through a screening device to remove at least a portion of the inert solids;separating the screened mixed liquor into a clarified effluent and an activated sludge;recycling a first portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor; andtreating a second portion of activated sludge in a sidestream bioreactor prior to returning the second portion of activated sludge to the mainstream reactor.
  • 48. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device is situated inside the mainstream reactor.
  • 49. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device is separate from and downstream of the mainstream reactor.
  • 50. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device comprises a single screen.
  • 51. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device comprises more than one screen arranged in one of series, parallel or combination thereof.
  • 52. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device comprises a drum screen.
  • 53. The method of claim 52, wherein the drum screen comprises wedgewire screening elements.
  • 54. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 100 μm.
  • 55. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device removes inert solids having average particle diameters greater than about 50 μm.
  • 56. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 50 μm to about 6,000 μm.
  • 57. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 50 μm to about 2,500 μm.
  • 58. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device comprises at least one screen having openings ranging in size from about 250μm to about 500μm.
  • 59. The method of claim 47, wherein the sidestream bioreactor is a sequencing facultative digester.
  • 60. The method of claim 47, wherein about 90% of the activated sludge is returned to the mainstream reactor as the first portion of activated sludge and about 10% of the activated sludge is returned to the mainstream reactor as the second portion of activated sludge.
  • 61. The method of claim 47, wherein the screening device is a media-based filter.
  • 62. The method of claim 47, wherein a membrane filter is used to separate the screened mixed liquor into the clarified effluent and the activated sludge.
  • 63. The method of claim 47 further comprising wasting at least a portion of the activated sludge.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/713,804 filed Sep. 2, 2005, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (155)
Number Name Date Kind
2893957 Genter et al. Jul 1959 A
3047492 Gambrel Jul 1962 A
3192155 Bready et al. Jun 1965 A
3259566 Torpey Jul 1966 A
3544476 Aiba et al. Dec 1970 A
3617540 Bishop et al. Nov 1971 A
3756946 Levin et al. Sep 1973 A
3787316 Brink et al. Jan 1974 A
3907672 Milne Sep 1975 A
3964998 Barnard Jun 1976 A
4042493 Matsch et al. Aug 1977 A
4056465 Spector Nov 1977 A
4132638 Carlsson Jan 1979 A
4141822 Levin et al. Feb 1979 A
4160724 Laughton Jul 1979 A
4162153 Spector Jul 1979 A
4173531 Matsch et al. Nov 1979 A
4271026 Chen et al. Jun 1981 A
4277342 Hayes et al. Jul 1981 A
4279753 Nielson et al. Jul 1981 A
4284510 Savard et al. Aug 1981 A
4323367 Ghosh Apr 1982 A
4351729 Witt Sep 1982 A
4370233 Hayes et al. Jan 1983 A
4374730 Braha et al. Feb 1983 A
4407717 Teletzke et al. Oct 1983 A
4491522 Ishida et al. Jan 1985 A
4522722 Nicholas Jun 1985 A
4527947 Elliot Jul 1985 A
4537682 Wong-Chong Aug 1985 A
4568457 Sullivan Feb 1986 A
4568462 Böhnke et al. Feb 1986 A
4599167 Benjes et al. Jul 1986 A
4632758 Whittle Dec 1986 A
4643830 Reid Feb 1987 A
RE32429 Spector Jun 1987 E
4675114 Zagyvai et al. Jun 1987 A
4705633 Bogusch Nov 1987 A
4731185 Chen et al. Mar 1988 A
4780198 Crawford et al. Oct 1988 A
4790939 Suzuki et al. Dec 1988 A
4797212 Von Nordenskjöld Jan 1989 A
4818391 Love Apr 1989 A
4842732 Tharp Jun 1989 A
4849108 De Wilde et al. Jul 1989 A
4867883 Daigger et al. Sep 1989 A
4874519 Williamson Oct 1989 A
4891136 Voyt Jan 1990 A
4915840 Rozich Apr 1990 A
4956094 Levin et al. Sep 1990 A
4961854 Wittmann et al. Oct 1990 A
4975197 Wittmann et al. Dec 1990 A
4999111 Williamson Mar 1991 A
5013442 Davis et al. May 1991 A
5019266 Soeder et al. May 1991 A
5022993 Williamson Jun 1991 A
5051191 Rasmussen et al. Sep 1991 A
5094752 Davis et al. Mar 1992 A
5098567 Nishiguchi Mar 1992 A
5114587 Hagerstedt May 1992 A
5126049 Hallberg Jun 1992 A
5128040 Molof et al. Jul 1992 A
5137636 Bundgaard Aug 1992 A
5151187 Behmann Sep 1992 A
5182021 Spector Jan 1993 A
5234595 DiGregorio et al. Aug 1993 A
5246585 Meiring Sep 1993 A
5254253 Behmann Oct 1993 A
5288405 Lamb, III Feb 1994 A
5288406 Stein Feb 1994 A
5304308 Tsumura et al. Apr 1994 A
5316682 Keyser et al. May 1994 A
5336290 Jermstad Aug 1994 A
5342522 Marsman et al. Aug 1994 A
5348653 Rovel Sep 1994 A
5348655 Simas et al. Sep 1994 A
5356537 Thurmond et al. Oct 1994 A
5376242 Hayakawa Dec 1994 A
5380438 Nungesser Jan 1995 A
5389258 Smis et al. Feb 1995 A
5480548 Daigger et al. Jan 1996 A
5482630 Lee et al. Jan 1996 A
5505862 Sonnenrein Apr 1996 A
5514277 Khudenko May 1996 A
5514278 Khudenko May 1996 A
5531896 Tambo et al. Jul 1996 A
5543051 Harris Aug 1996 A
5543063 Walker et al. Aug 1996 A
5582734 Coleman et al. Dec 1996 A
5601719 Hawkins et al. Feb 1997 A
5611927 Schmid Mar 1997 A
5624562 Scroggins Apr 1997 A
5624565 Lefevre et al. Apr 1997 A
5626755 Keyser et al. May 1997 A
5650069 Hong et al. Jul 1997 A
5651891 Molof et al. Jul 1997 A
5658458 Keyser et al. Aug 1997 A
5725772 Shirodkar Mar 1998 A
5733455 Molof et al. Mar 1998 A
5733456 Okey et al. Mar 1998 A
5746919 Dague et al. May 1998 A
5773526 Van Dijk et al. Jun 1998 A
5811008 Von Nordenskjold Sep 1998 A
5818412 Maekawa Oct 1998 A
5824222 Keyser et al. Oct 1998 A
5833856 Liu et al. Nov 1998 A
5846424 Khudenko Dec 1998 A
5853588 Molof et al. Dec 1998 A
5858222 Shibata et al. Jan 1999 A
5919367 Khudenko Jul 1999 A
5989428 Goronszy Nov 1999 A
5993503 Kruidhof Nov 1999 A
6004463 Swett Dec 1999 A
6015496 Khudenko Jan 2000 A
6036862 Stover Mar 2000 A
6039874 Teran et al. Mar 2000 A
6047768 Buehler, III Apr 2000 A
6054044 Hoffland et al. Apr 2000 A
6066256 Henry et al. May 2000 A
6077430 Chudoba et al. Jun 2000 A
6113788 Molof et al. Sep 2000 A
6117323 Haggerty Sep 2000 A
6193889 Teran et al. Feb 2001 B1
6217768 Hansen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6352643 Kwon et al. Mar 2002 B1
6383387 Hasegawa et al. May 2002 B2
6416668 Al-Samadi Jul 2002 B1
6454949 Sesay et al. Sep 2002 B1
6527956 Lefevre et al. Mar 2003 B1
6555002 Garcia et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562237 Olaopa May 2003 B1
6585895 Smith et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592762 Smith Jul 2003 B2
6605220 Garcia et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613238 Schloss Sep 2003 B2
6630067 Shieh et al. Oct 2003 B2
6660163 Miklos Dec 2003 B2
6706185 Goel et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712970 Trivedi Mar 2004 B1
6783679 Rozich Aug 2004 B1
6787035 Wang Sep 2004 B2
6805806 Arnaud Oct 2004 B2
6814868 Phagoo et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833074 Miklos Dec 2004 B2
6863818 Daigger et al. Mar 2005 B2
6884355 Kamiya et al. Apr 2005 B2
6893567 Vanotti et al. May 2005 B1
7105091 Miklos Sep 2006 B2
7208090 Applegate et al. Apr 2007 B2
20010045390 Kim et al. Nov 2001 A1
20040016698 Unger Jan 2004 A1
20050040103 Abu-Orf et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050045557 Daigger et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060113243 Applegate et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070000836 Elefritz et al. Jan 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
4 238 708 May 1994 DE
4444335 Jun 1996 DE
0 106 043 Apr 1984 EP
0 408 878 Jan 1991 EP
0 440 996 Aug 1991 EP
1 236 686 Sep 2002 EP
2 006 743 May 1979 GB
59032999 Feb 1984 JP
59052597 Mar 1984 JP
60-84199 May 1985 JP
61192389 Aug 1986 JP
63130197 Jun 1988 JP
62138986 Dec 1988 JP
63302996 Dec 1988 JP
01174949 Feb 1991 JP
3042019 Feb 1991 JP
6091285 Apr 1994 JP
P2000-199086 Jul 2000 JP
2000210542 Aug 2000 JP
9301791 Oct 1993 NL
1 596 752 Sep 1995 RU
WO 9315026 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9424055 Oct 1994 WO
WO 03072512 Sep 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070051677 A1 Mar 2007 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60713804 Sep 2005 US