The present invention relates to vibratory screening apparatus suitable for use with drilling fluids, mineral processing, classification, and dewatering, and the like.
Vibratory screening apparatus is widely used in the oil drilling industry for removing drill cuttings from drilling fluids, and over the years various improvements have been made to the screens used therein, methods for mounting the screens etc to improve ease of use, reduce maintenance etc. A particular problem in offshore platform oil drilling is, however, that platform real estate is very restricted and extremely expensive. There is accordingly a need to improve the efficiency of vibratory screening apparatus in relation to the physical size thereof.
The present invention provides a vibratory screening apparatus for use in removing solids from a liquid and solids mixture feed, said apparatus comprising a static outer housing, at least one floating basket mounted so as to be vibratable, in use of the apparatus, by a vibrator device formed and arranged for vibrating said basket, said basket mounting a stack of screen assemblies, with superposed screen assemblies separated from each other by a respective flow directing tray, said apparatus being provided with a flow distributor formed and arranged for dividing said feed into at least a first feed stream and a second feed stream and directing said feed streams onto respective ones of first and second screen assemblies, and receiving filtrate from a respective screen assembly, from said respective flow directing tray(s).
With an apparatus of the present invention, the size of apparatus required to process a given volume of feed is substantially reduced compared with conventional apparatus, since a substantially increased effective screen surface area can be accommodated with relatively little or no increase in the size of the apparatus by means of stacking a plurality of screen assemblies within a single basket and using a flow distributor to route multiple flows in parallel through different screens in the stack.
Advantageously the distributor is formed and arranged so as to be switchable between a plurality of different flow directing configurations. Conveniently said plurality of flow directing configurations includes an intensive screening configuration in which the whole of the feed is directed onto said first screen assembly and the whole of the filtrate from said first screen assembly is directed onto said second screen assembly. Alternatively or additionally there is provided a restricted feed capacity configuration in which the whole of the feed is directed onto only one of said first and second screen assemblies, and the filtrate therefrom exhausted directly from the apparatus without passing through the other one said first and second screen assemblies. Such a configuration is useful for basic fluid processing where high efficiency or high volume processing are not required and a reduced number of screens in operation reduces operating cost for screens consumed.
Advantageously the mesh sizes of the various screens are selected to suit the particular distributor configuration being employed and/or the loading of the mixture (% solids content), the particle size of the solids, and/or the particle size distribution of the solids. Thus for example in a configuration where the feed is divided into one portion passing through the first screen and not the second, and another portion passing through the second screen and not the first, the first and second screens would normally have the same mesh size. On the other hand in a configuration where the whole of the feed is passed successively through both the first and second screens, then the second screen would normally have a finer mesh size than the first screen.
In general the distributor will comprise a plurality of passages provided with valves, typically flap valves, sleeve valves or plug valves, or closure plates etc, for selective opening or closing of different passages. The distributor may be mounted in either the static housing or on the floating basket. It is also possible, in principle, for part of the distributor to be mounted in the static housing and part on the floating basket. Where a greater or lesser part of the distributor is mounted in the static housing, then the distributor is generally provided with flexible conduit portions defining at least part of the passages, for coupling the passages from the static housing to the floating basket.
The passages of the distributor may be defined in various different ways. Conveniently they are defined by walls extending downwardly inside a downwardly extending chamber so as to provide a lateral subdivision of the chamber into individual passages providing predetermined proportions of the distributor flow capacity. Thus, for example, the distributor may be formed and arranged with one or more first flow passages for transmitting said first feed stream, and one or more second flow passages for transmitting said second feed stream.
It is generally preferred that vibratory screen apparatus should have a plurality of screen assembly stages with decreasing mesh size, i.e. meshes of successively finer cut. It will accordingly be appreciated that in addition to having first and second screen assemblies, with similar mesh size, formed and arranged for intercepting said first and second feed streams respectively, the vibratory basket may also have one or more further screen assemblies with different mesh size upstream and/or downstream of said first and second screen assemblies. Conveniently there is provided upstream of first and second screen assemblies, an initial, coarser mesh size, screen assembly and the vibratory screening apparatus is formed and arranged so that substantially the whole of the liquid and solids mixture feed is directed through said initial screen assembly, before being divided into said at least first and second feed streams. In such cases there would generally be used an initial screen assembly with a mesh size of around 10 to 80 (wires per inch), for example, about 20, and the first and second screen assemblies would have a mesh size of around 40 to 325, conveniently 100 to 250 for example about 200. In yet another possible distributor configuration which could also be provided, the feed is passed only through the initial coarse screen.
It will also be appreciated that, whilst in accordance with normal practice, all of the separated out solids are disposed of in one way or another, in certain cases it is advantageous to retain within the recycled drilling mud fluid, some solids within a particular size range. Typically these may comprise one or more of sized salt, sized calcium carbonate, and other suitable solids, which are selected to be of a size compatible with minimising formation damage during drilling of a specific formation such as an oil reservoir or a zone where fluid can be lost to the formation. In this instance solids above a specified size can be removed with a top screen and rejected, while solids of a smaller size but greater than a second size, can be separated with the second screen and subsequently returned to the drilling fluid mud system, with solids smaller than those removed by the second screen but larger than a third size, may be removed with a third screen and rejected. In other cases it may be desirable to return only the largest size particle fraction separated out at the first screen, for return to the drilling fluid where this is used in formations with particularly large pore size.
Various screen assemblies and screen mounting systems may be used in the apparatus and baskets of the present invention, including, for example, those described in our earlier patent publication WO 03/013690.
The floating basket may be mounted in any convenient manner known in the art. Typically there is used a resilient mounting such as a coil spring or rubber block mounting, and the basket vibrated with an eccentrically rotating weight drive. Other forms of resilient mounting may be more convenient with other forms of drive, for example, a leaf spring mounting, with the basket being vibrated with an electromagnetic displacement drive being used to displace the basket against the return force of the spring mounting.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a basket suitable for use in a vibratory screening apparatus, said basket mounting a stack of screen assemblies, with superposed screen assemblies separated from each other by a respective flow directing tray, and being provided with a flow distributor formed and arranged for dividing said feed into at least a first feed stream and a second feed stream and directing said feed streams onto respective ones of first and second screen assemblies, and receiving filtrate from a respective screen assembly, from said respective flow directing tray(s).
In another aspect the present invention provides a vibratory screening apparatus for use in removing solids from a liquid and solids mixture feed, said apparatus comprising a static outer housing, at least one floating basket mounted so as to be vibratable, in use of the apparatus, by a vibrator device formed and arranged for vibrating said basket, said basket mounting a stack of screen assemblies separated by flow directing trays, said apparatus being provided with a flow distributor formed and arranged for dividing said feed into at least a first feed stream and a second feed stream and directing said feed streams onto respective ones of first and second screen assemblies, and receiving from respective flow directing trays, respective filtrates from said respective screen assemblies.
In a yet further aspect the present invention provides a basket suitable for use in a vibratory screening apparatus, said basket mounting a stack of screen assemblies separated by flow directing trays, and being provided with a flow distributor formed and arranged for dividing said feed into at least a first feed stream and a second feed stream and directing said feed streams onto respective ones of first and second screen assemblies, and receiving from respective flow directing trays, respective filtrates from said respective screen assemblies.
Further preferred features and advantages of the invention will appear from the following detailed description given by way of example of preferred embodiments illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIGS. 2A/B to 4A/B show schematically a distributor 15 provided at one end 16 of the floating basket 4. The distributor 15 is formed and arranged into inside and outside passages 17, 18 shown in
FIGS. 2A/B, 3A/B and 4A/B show different configurations of the distributor 15 for providing different feed flow arrangements through the screen assemblies 8, which are indicated as A, B and C, respectively, in
In more detail
Below the first deck tray 32 is disposed a second deck 35 comprising a second screen 36 above a respective flowback tray 37. A certain amount of fluid 38 is retained on the second screen 36 by a weir 39 provided at the lower end 40 thereof. When the flow rate of the feed of fluid 33 to be screened, exceeds the capacity of the second screen, part 41 of the fluid 38 overflows the weir 39 either directly into one or other of two vertically extending conduits 42 at opposite sides of the module 28, or onto one or other of two sloping deflector plates 43 which divert it into a respective one of the conduit 42, as shown by the single headed fluid flow arrows in
At the bottom 44 of the vertical conduits 42 are provided rearwardly facing openings 45 through which the diverted fluid 41 is directed onto the screen 46 of a third deck 47 disposed below the second deck 35. Thus this part 41 of the fluid flow 33 passes through the first deck screen 31 and the third deck screen 46, by-passing the second deck screen 36 (see also
That part 38 of the fluid 33 retained on the second screen 36 is passed through the second deck screen 36 (the solid particulate material 49 retained thereon being “walked up” the screen 36 in the usual way—see
The module 28 as described above, may be readily reconfigured for serial operation whereby the whole of the fluid is passes through each one of the first, second and third deck screens, 31, 36, 46, as shown in
Each of the first and second modules 28, 29, would normally be configured in the same way, but if desired they could be configured differently i.e. one for parallel (2 screen) operation and one for series (3 screen) operation. Also single screen operation is possible when required, by removing one or two screens from the or each module—depending on the configuration of the modules and the fluid feed arrangement. In addition the fluid feed to the apparatus can be arranged to be directed to either or both of the modules (see also further discussion hereinbelow with reference to
A particular advantage of this type of embodiment is that, in its parallel configuration, a more even and controlled distribution of the fluid flow across the width of the module is obtained, thereby providing a more efficient screening. Another significant advantage is a significantly increased fluid screening capacity—which can approach almost 100% greater than with conventional screening apparatus of the same footprint.
It will also be appreciated that various parameters of the modules may be made further configurable. Thus, for example, the weir height could be configurable for a series of different heights. Also the relative proportions of the central and side, vertical conduits could be selected to accommodate particular desired flow capacity proportions for the different fluid flow parts in parallel mode operation.
It will further be appreciated that various modifications may be made to the above embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Thus, for example, in place of a flow distributor system based on the use of closure plates and/or flap valves, there could be used one based on proportional valves and the like.
In the apparatus shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0313521.7 | Jun 2003 | GB | national |
0329920.3 | Dec 2003 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/561,331 filed Dec. 16, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,740,761 which is a 371 of PCT/GB04/02544 filed Jun. 14, 2004, which claims priority of United Kingdom Patent Applications 031321.7 filed Jun. 12, 2004 and 329920.3 filed Dec. 24, 2003. The above-cited related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
957193 | Dempster | May 1910 | A |
1995435 | Overstrom | Mar 1935 | A |
2329333 | Carter | Sep 1943 | A |
2576283 | Chaney | Nov 1951 | A |
2782927 | Derrick, Jr. | Feb 1957 | A |
2901109 | Buehler | Aug 1959 | A |
2943679 | Scott et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3221825 | Henderson | Dec 1965 | A |
3452868 | Miller | Jul 1969 | A |
3718963 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3899414 | Hansen | Aug 1975 | A |
4116288 | Love | Sep 1978 | A |
4234416 | Lower et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4306974 | Harry | Dec 1981 | A |
4319990 | Muller et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4319991 | Crone, Jr. et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322288 | Schmidt | Mar 1982 | A |
4340469 | Archer | Jul 1982 | A |
4446022 | Harry et al. | May 1984 | A |
4446055 | Shah et al. | May 1984 | A |
4576713 | Melin | Mar 1986 | A |
4634535 | Lott | Jan 1987 | A |
4735712 | Herren et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4940535 | Fisher et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5221008 | Derrick, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5341939 | Aitchison et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5593582 | Roff, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5614094 | Deister et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5641070 | Seyffert | Jun 1997 | A |
5749471 | Andersson | May 1998 | A |
5816413 | Boccabella et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5853583 | Shah | Dec 1998 | A |
6155428 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179128 | Seyffert | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6510947 | Schulte et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530482 | Wiseman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533946 | Pullman | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6868972 | Seyffert et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892887 | Rayborn | May 2005 | B2 |
6953097 | Seyffert | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7520342 | Butler et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7571817 | Scott et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7703612 | Browne et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20060144779 | Bailey | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20090308819 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100270216 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110005742 | Marshall et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110297373 | Timmerman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
714 591 | Jan 2000 | AU |
3015665 | Oct 1981 | DE |
4210770 | Oct 1993 | DE |
0024784 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0908599 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1088582 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1631367 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2092971 | Aug 2009 | EP |
957193 | May 1964 | GB |
2224455 | May 1990 | GB |
2318401 | Apr 1998 | GB |
WO-9633792 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9746327 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9816328 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9816295 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-0181014 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-03013690 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004048004 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
VSM 300 Shal Shaker Brochure 2001. |
Brandt, A Varco Company; Introducing a Proprietary Screen Technology That Maximises Screen Life and Performance; Roustabout International Energy Magazine; Jan. 2003; pp. 1-2; Issue 375. |
Axiom Process Ltd.; Ax-1 Shaker; 2001; pp. 1-23; Aberdeen, Scotland. |
Brandt, A Varco Company, Introducing a Proprietary Screen Technology That Maximises Screen Life and Performance; Platform Oil & Gas Technology Review; Jan. 2003; pp. 1-2; Midlothian, Scotland, UK. |
Sweco Oil Field Service Division; Sweco Mud Cleaner; A Manual of Directions for Installation, Operation and Maintenance; 1981, pp. 1-39; Austin, TX, U.S.A. |
Thule United Limited, A United Wire Company; Early Solids Removal; The VSM 120 Primary Shales; 1982, pp. 1-6; Aberdeen, Scotland. |
Brandt, A Varco Company; Brandt's VSM Ultra Shaker Advances Solids Control to the Next Level; VSM Ultra; 2003, pp. 1-2, brandt@varco.com. |
World Oil; The Composite Catalot of Oilfield Equipment & Services; 2002, pp. 665-667; 45th Edition. |
Thule Rigtech, A Divsion of Technology Limited; Linear Motion Shale Shaker; VSM 100; 1992, pp. 1-18; Aberdeen, Scotland. |
Brandt, A Varco Company; VSM-300 Shaker; The World's First Balanced Elliptical Motion. Low Profile, Cascade Shaker: Accept No Substitutes; 2001, pp. 1-4, www.varco.com. |
Brandt/EPI, The Handbook On Solids Control & Waste Management; 4th Ed.; Published by Brandt/EPI; 1996; pp. 1-135, U.S.A. |
James Andrews et al.; Shale Shakers Techniques and Technology for Improving Solids Control Management and Drilling Fluid Systems; 1999, pp. 1-352; Gulf Professional Publishing; U.S.A. |
Sweco Oilfield Services, A Division of Environmental Procedures, Inc.; LM-3 Full-Flo Shale SHaker Linear Motion, Low Profile Design and 40 Percent More Screening Area at the Flow Line; 1991; pp. 1-4; Houston, TX, U.S.A. |
Sweco South Western Engineering Co.; SWECO Separator Success Stories, 1965, pp. 1-2, U.S.A. |
Dr. Fred Growcock, “How to Stabilize and Strengthen the Wellbore During Drilling Operations”, Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Program, Jun. 2, 2012, pp. 1-33, www.spe.org/dl. |
Axiom Process Ltd.; Ax-1 Shaker; 2010; pp. 1-23; Aberdeen, Scotland. |
Sweco, “Vibro Energy Separator Green Manual-three deck” Sweco 1979. |
Brandt, “DS-DT Brant Tandem Screen Separators” The Brandt Company, 1978. |
Sweco, “Sweco Solids Control Handbook” Sweco, Inc., 1985. |
Sweco, “Solids Control Equipment Sales Brochure-LCM” Sweco Oil Field Service Division, 1983. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080251428 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10561331 | US | |
Child | 12057505 | US |