The present invention relates to a scroll pump, which is often referred to as a scroll compressor.
A prior art scroll compressor, or pump, 100 is shown in
The fixed scroll 112 comprises a scroll wall 118 which extends perpendicularly to a generally circular base plate 120. The orbiting scroll 122 comprises a scroll wall 124 which extends perpendicularly to a generally circular base plate 126. The orbiting scroll wall 124 co-operates, or meshes, with the fixed scroll wall 118 during orbiting movement of the orbiting scroll. Relative orbital movement of the scrolls causes a volume of gas to be trapped between the scrolls and pumped from the inlet to the outlet.
A scroll pump is typically a dry pump and not lubricated. In order to prevent back leakage, the space between the axial ends of a scroll wall of one scroll and the base plate of the other scroll is sealed by a tip seal 128. An enlarged cross-section through a portion of the fixed scroll 112 showing the tip seal 128 in more detail is shown in
As shown in
When bedding in or during use, the tip seals 128 are worn by contact with the opposing scroll base plate 120, 126 generating tip seal dust. When the pump is used for pumping a clean environment such as a vacuum chamber of a silicon wafer processing apparatus, it is desirable that the tip seal dust does not migrate upstream into the vacuum chamber, particularly during pump down times.
The present invention provides a scroll compressor comprising a scroll pumping mechanism comprising:
an orbiting scroll having an orbiting scroll wall extending axially from an orbiting scroll plate towards a fixed scroll; and
a fixed scroll having an fixed scroll wall extending axially from a fixed scroll plate towards the orbiting scroll; the compressor comprising
an axially extending drive shaft having an eccentric shaft portion so that rotation of the eccentric shaft portion imparts an orbiting motion to the orbiting scroll relative to the fixed scroll for pumping fluid from an inlet to an outlet of the pumping mechanism;
wherein an axial end portion of one of the scroll walls has a first sealing arrangement and a second sealing arrangement arranged in series along the scroll wall from the inlet to the outlet for sealing between the axial end portion of the scroll wall and the scroll plate of the opposing scroll, said first sealing arrangement having first sealing characteristics which are selected according to sealing requirements local to the first sealing arrangements and said second sealing arrangement having second sealing characteristics which are selected according to sealing requirements local to the second sealing arrangements, and said first sealing characteristics are different from said second sealing characteristics.
Other preferred and/or optional aspects of the invention are defined in the accompanying claims.
In order that the present invention may be well understood, an embodiment thereof, which is given by way of example only, will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A scroll compressor, or pump, 10 is shown in
The fixed scroll 22 comprises a scroll wall 28 which extends perpendicularly to a generally circular base plate 30. The orbiting scroll 20 comprises a scroll wall 34 which extends perpendicularly to a generally circular base plate 36. The orbiting scroll wall 34 co-operates, or meshes, with the fixed scroll wall 28 during orbiting movement of the orbiting scroll. Relative orbital movement of the scrolls causes a volume of gas to be trapped between the scrolls and pumped from the inlet to the outlet.
As indicated above with reference to the prior art, a scroll pump is typically a dry pump and not lubricated. Therefore, in order to prevent back leakage, the space between the axial ends of a scroll wall of one scroll and the base plate of the other scroll is sealed by sealing arrangement, which generally comprise tip seals. The tip seals close the gap between scrolls caused by manufacturing and operating tolerances, and reduce the leakage to an acceptable level. Tip seals suffer from the generation of tip seal dust. Further, in a normal scroll pump, tip seals require replacement at regular intervals after they become worn. Also, the channel 132 shown in
Tip-seals typically fail by no longer providing sufficient control of back leakage. Examination of “failed” seals show that many seals have excessive wear limited to a local region for example towards the centre wraps 44 of a scroll as shown in
Therefore, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, an axial end portion of at least one of the scroll walls has a first sealing arrangement and a second sealing arrangement arranged in series along the scroll wall from the inlet to the outlet for sealing between the axial end portion of the scroll wall and the scroll plate of the opposing scroll, said first sealing arrangement having first sealing characteristics which are selected according to sealing requirements local to the first sealing arrangements and said second sealing arrangement having second sealing characteristics which are selected according to sealing requirements local to the second sealing arrangements, and said first sealing characteristics are different from said second sealing characteristics. The invention covers not only two sealing arrangements in series but a plurality of such sealing arrangement in series. Local conditions include without limitation pressure differential across a scroll wall, absolute pressure on each side of a scroll wall, tip seal wear rate, molecular/non-molecular flow, back-leakage requirements, required compression and pump speed, and power consumption. The sealing characteristics are selected to meet such local conditions and may include, variations in the size or aspect of a tip seal, the material of the tip seal, the absence of a tip seal, and the provision of formations, such as pockets in an axial end face of a scroll wall.
The replacement of a standard tip-seal having constant sealing characteristics between the inlet and the outlet offers a number of advantages. Embodiments of the invention provide two or more discrete sealing arrangements in series, within a given spiral form, in order to optimise each section according to its local operating conditions.
The first sealing arrangement is arranged along the scroll wall towards the inlet and the second sealing arrangement is arranged towards the outlet of the pumping mechanism. Typically, the pressure differential across a scroll wall towards the outlet is higher than the pressure differential across a scroll wall towards the inlet. Accordingly, there is a greater propensity for back-leakage to occur towards the outlet than towards the inlet. Therefore, the second sealing arrangement is required to provide better sealing capability than the first sealing arrangement. In other words, the second sealing arrangement is more resistant to back-leakage than the first sealing arrangement. Accordingly, the size of the tip seal of the first sealing arrangement is reduced to decrease the amount of tip seal dust which is generated when the pump is in use. Alternatively, the first sealing arrangement may consist of an axial end face of a scroll without a tip seal. In this way, not only can the generation of tip seal dust be decreased but also power consumption can be reduced since there is less resistance to movement with a smaller tip seal or in the absence of a tip seal. By way of further examples, when the sealing arrangements comprise respective tip seals received in respective channels at the axial ends of the scroll walls the sealing characteristics are one or more of an axial height, a radial width, or a material of the tip seals.
Typically, the wear rate of a tip seal is relatively low in the inlet region 56 and relatively high in the outlet region 44 (shown also in
In
As will be seen from
Additionally, the provision of a wider tip seal can be used on the orbiting scroll as a buffer, or damper, to stabilise axial movement of the scrolls.
The arrangements shown in
The tip seals shown in
Accordingly, as described with reference to
In
In a modification of the
The sealing arrangement at the exhaust region 44 is not restricted to the particular shape of pockets shown in
As shown in
The first and second sealing arrangements may comprise tip seals which in use contact a counter-face surface of the opposing scroll plate forming a seal. The characteristics of the seal formed are dependent not only on the size and material of the tip seals but also on the material, treatment or finish of the counter-face surface. Accordingly, the sealing characteristics of the first sealing arrangement and/or the second sealing arrangement can be selected by choosing an appropriate material, treatment or finish of the scroll plate of the opposing scroll wall. For example, the counter-face surface may be treated to increase or decrease friction between the contacting surfaces and therefore decrease wear rate for instance of the tip seal of the second seal arrangement located at the outlet region 44.
In the embodiments and modifications described hereto, one of the scroll walls is configured with first and second sealing arrangements having different sealing characteristics. Additionally, both the scroll walls can be configured with first and second sealing arrangements having different sealing characteristics. The orbiting scroll 20 may be provided first and second sealing arrangements and the fixed scroll wall may be provided with third and fourth sealing arrangements. The first and third (and second and fourth) sealing arrangements may be the same although as the fixed scroll and the orbiting scroll have slightly different local sealing requirements, the first and the third sealing (and second and fourth) arrangements may also have different sealing characteristics.
In a further embodiment shown in
The three sealing arrangements 82, 84, 86 are selected to control the axial gaps G1, G2, G3 between the scroll wall or walls 20, 22 and the opposing scroll plate or plates 30, 36. The axial gaps control the amount of leakage across the scroll wall. If the axial gap is larger more leakage occurs and if the axial gap is smaller less leakage occurs. In the example shown in
The sealing arrangement 86 comprises a fixed seal which has a fixed axial gap G3 from the scroll plate of the opposing scroll. In known arrangements in which a floating tip seal is provided at the exhaust region 92, high compression is achieved, potentially compressing gas to pressures above atmosphere. Typically, exhaust pressures above atmosphere are undesirable because the energy required to increase pressure above atmosphere is wasted in a vacuum pump. In the example shown, the fixed tip seal is selected to achieve an axial gap G3 which allows back-leakage to occur thereby decreasing resistance to relative movement of the scrolls. A fixed scroll may instead comprise an axial end face of the scroll wall in which pockets may be formed.
The sealing arrangement 82 does not comprise a tip seal but instead comprises an axial end face of the scroll in which pockets may be formed. The axial gap G1 is selected to allow a certain amount of back-leakage of molecules across the scroll wall thereby reducing compression but increasing pumping speed. Alternatively, the gap G1 is selected to be as small as possible within manufacturing and operating tolerances to minimise back-leakage.
Selection of the axial gap G1, G2, G3 between a scroll wall and an opposing scroll plate had been described with reference to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0914220.9 | Aug 2009 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2010/051078 | 6/30/2010 | WO | 00 | 2/10/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/018642 | 2/17/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4415317 | Butterworth | Nov 1983 | A |
4437820 | Terauchi et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4462771 | Teegarden | Jul 1984 | A |
4561832 | Shimizu | Dec 1985 | A |
4627799 | Terauchi | Dec 1986 | A |
4730375 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4740143 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4753583 | Hiraga et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4824343 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4869658 | Tsutsumi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5035589 | Fraser, Jr. et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5767186 | Shimokusuzono et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5833443 | Lifson | Nov 1998 | A |
6068459 | Clarke et al. | May 2000 | A |
6193487 | Ni | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6354825 | Fujiwara et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6720071 | Ishii | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6783338 | Moroi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6860728 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887052 | Bush et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7364418 | Masuda et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7950912 | Sato et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20020057976 | Kimura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030063989 | Rinella | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20100086427 | Kudo | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101449061 | Jun 2009 | CN |
0041802 | May 1981 | EP |
0438025 | Jul 1991 | EP |
1876356 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2055955 | Jun 2009 | EP |
55037515 | Mar 1980 | JP |
1106989 | Oct 1987 | JP |
02009975 | Jun 1988 | JP |
02149785 | Nov 1988 | JP |
07077181 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07158568 | Jun 1995 | JP |
08261171 | Aug 1996 | JP |
9195958 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H09256972 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10009158 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10047265 | Feb 1998 | JP |
H11280676 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001003882 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2005163745 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2005351111 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2006097656 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006307760 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2008184944 | Jan 2007 | JP |
9817895 | Apr 1998 | WO |
0022302 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, 14 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, filed Feb. 6, 2012 entitled Scroll Pump. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,328, filed Feb. 7, 2012 entitled Scroll Pump. |
Response filed Jan. 15, 2014 to the Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, 21 pgs. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, 29 pgs. |
Response filed Jun. 24, 2014 to the Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, 33 pgs. |
Examination Report from counterpart Patent Application No. GB0914220.9, dated Nov. 11, 2014, 5 pp. |
Examination Report from counterpart Application No. GB1202156.4, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 2 pp. |
First Office Action and Search Report, and translation thereof, from counterpart Taiwan Application No. 099124195, dated Nov. 26, 21015, 7 pp. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, dated Nov. 16, 2015, 28 pp. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, dated May 15, 2015, 20 pp. |
Examination Report from counterpart Patent Application No. GB0914220.9, dated May 12, 2015, 3 pp. |
Response to the Office Action mailed May 15, 2015, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/389,096, filed Aug. 10, 2015, 16 pp. |
English Translation of Search Report from Taiwan Patent Application No. 099124195, Apr. 28, 2015, 1 pp. |
Examination Report from counterpart Great Britain application No. GB1202156.4, dated Jul. 2, 2015, 4 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120141311 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |