1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a ventilation system for efficiently removing cooking effluents and combustion products from the exhaust of a cooking appliance.
2. Description of Related Art
Traditionally, restaurant kitchens are ventilated by capturing the cooking effluents and, in the case of gas-fired appliances, combustion products in a hood and transporting the grease-laden exhaust airflow from the inside of the building to the outdoors through welded steel ducts. The grease load in the welded steel ducts is reduced by fitting the hoods with a baffler or slot filters that remove the heavier grease particles by impaction. The smaller, lighter grease particles and grease vapors bypass these filters and deposit on the duct walls and the building creating fire and safety issues.
Traditional kitchen ventilation systems are expensive, in no small part because of the welded steel ductwork, resulting in acceptance of recirculating ventilation technology that does not require the removal of all exhaust airflow from the building. Such recirculating ventilation technology typically includes a hood and a grease filtering element to capture grease from the cooking effluents and combustion products from the gas-fired appliance. An odor removal or control element is also positioned within the hood together with a blower to return the scrubbed air back to the interior of the building. A fire suppression device is also required to control the dangers associated with ignition of grease or other combustion products.
The grease filtering element according to related art devices may comprise an electronic air cleaner such as an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) or HEPA filters. Such electronic air cleaners are often used to filter air drawn into the building and more recently are used to clean grease-laden exhaust airflow prior to recirculation back into the building. These systems must have fire suppression devices because the electronic air cleaners use a high field voltage and may act as an ignition source. Further, grease may collect within the device and may ignite if a fire starts in an appliance positioned beneath the device.
Several existing recirculation ventilation units featuring ESP technology followed by charcoal granular filters are now in use. In such devices, the ESP modules are largely effective only in removing grease particles and droplets with little impact on grease vapor and cooking odors. However, grease vapor may account for approximately 50-60% by weight of the grease emitted during frying and approximately 40% by weight of the grease emitted during char-broiling. Given the apparent lack of effectiveness of the ESP modules in removing grease vapor, the charcoal filters located upstream become coated with grease vapor and are thus only marginally effective with respect to their primary function, odor control. Finally, the ESP modules must be maintained on a regular, often times daily basis to clean grease from internal plates or the performance of the ESP modules quickly drops off.
Therefore, there exists a need for a low cost, low maintenance ventilation system that will effectively remove cooking effluents and combustion products, as well as associated odors, from the exhaust of a cooking appliance.
It is one object of this invention to provide a ventilation system for efficiently removing cooking effluents from the exhaust gases of a cooking appliance.
It is another object of this invention to provide a ventilation system for efficiently removing cooking effluents and combustion products from the exhaust gases of gas-fired cooking appliances.
It is another object of this invention to provide a method for removing the cooking effluents and combustion products from the exhaust gases of the gas-fired cooking appliance.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a ventilation system and method for efficiently controlling the odor associated with the cooking effluents and combustion products of the gas-fired cooking appliance.
These and other objects of this invention are addressed by a ventilation system comprising a ventilation hood having an air inlet and an exhaust gas outlet, which ventilation hood is disposed over a cooking appliance to capture and direct cooking effluents, including grease particles and grease vapors, into the ventilation system. Combustion products may be captured by the hood and exhausted from the cooking area separately from the cooking effluents. A water bath is disposed in the ventilation hood between the air inlet and the exhaust gas outlet and is in fluid communication with both the air inlet and the exhaust gas outlet. Also disposed within the ventilation hood above and downstream of the water bath is a removal means for removing the cooking effluents from the exhaust gases. As used herein, the terms “upstream” and “downstream” are defined in terms of the direction of flow of the air and exhaust gases through the ventilation system. Thus, the water bath is considered to be downstream of the air inlet and upstream of the exhaust gas outlet. As the airflow moves from the air inlet into the water bath and through the removal means for removing the cooking effluents from the exhaust gases, the airflow is dispersed to form a plurality of air bubbles. The cooking effluents are “captured” by the removal means, resulting in their removal from the exhaust gases. Without wishing to be bound to any single explanation or theory regarding the mechanism of this invention, it is believed that the formation of air bubbles by and within the removal means provides the principle means for removal of the cooking effluents from the exhaust gases. The clean exhaust gases may then be recirculated through the appliance or the building or vented to the atmosphere.
These and other objects and features of this invention will be better understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein:
Disposed within ventilation hood 12 is a water bath 14, which is in fluid communication with air inlet 13, whereby the exhaust gases from cooking appliance 11 are directed through air inlet 13 and into contact with the water in the water bath 14. In accordance with one preferred embodiment of this invention, the bottom 23 of water bath 14 is V-shaped. The direction of the exhaust gases from cooking appliance 11 into contact with the water in water bath 14, in accordance with one embodiment of this invention, is facilitated by baffle 19 and water bath wall 20 which direct the exhaust as indicated by the arrows.
Disposed above and downstream of water bath 14 is removal means for removing the cooking effluents from the exhaust gases. In accordance with one preferred embodiment of this invention, the removal means comprises an effluent removal assembly 30 as shown in FIG. 2. The effluent removal assembly 30 is disposed above and downstream of water bath 14 and comprises a porous web material 16 disposed between an open support structure 15 and a perforated plate 17. As used in the specification and claims hereof, the term “porous”, when used to describe a material, refers to a material having pores through which a gaseous fluid is able to pass. As used in the specification and claims hereof, the term “perforated”, when used to describe a material, refers to a material having one or more holes that are formed by perforation means such as a punch or bore or drill. As used in the specification and claims hereof, the term “open support structure” refers to a substantially planar element with openings through which the cooking effluents can pass into the porous web material 16. In accordance with one preferred embodiment of this invention, the open support structure is a perforated plate or foil. In accordance with another preferred embodiment, the open support structure is a wire mesh screen. A suitable porous web material, FM 100 Poly Media, is available from Fiberbond Corporation, Michigan City, Ind. In accordance with one particularly preferred embodiment of this invention, the effluent removal assembly 30 is a planar structure with the wire mesh screen 15 disposed on the face of the porous web material 16 that faces water bath 14.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of this invention, perforated plate 17 comprises a plurality of perforations or apertures 31. Preferably, but not necessarily, perforations 31 form an open area of about 36% of the surface of the plate and have a generally circular cross-section having a diameter of about 0.109 inches to about 0.142 inches, more preferably about 0.123 inches to about 0.127 inches. Perforations 31 may have any shape and/or dimensions suitable for precluding cooking effluents from blocking or restricting exhaust gas flow therethrough.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of this invention, porous web material 16 has a thickness in the range of about 2.0 inches to about 4.0 inches, more preferably in the range of about 3.0 inches to about 3.3 inches. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that this thickness may be achieved by a single layer of porous web material or it may be achieved by the combination of a plurality of individual layers of porous web material. In addition to thickness, porosity of the porous web material is an important element in terms of achieving the desired cooking effluent removal. If the porosity is too low, the amount of exhaust gases laden with cooking effluents that passes through the porous web material will also be low, resulting in a relatively high pressure drop across the porous web material, which, in turn, will require the use of more energy to enable passage of the exhaust gases through the porous web material. On the other hand, if the porosity is too high, the water from water bath 14 will pass through the porous web material without producing the bubbling effect believed to be a contributing factor in the removal of the cooking effluent from the exhaust gases. Preferably, the porous web material 16 has a porosity that corresponds to a pressure drop across the porous web material 16 in the range of about 0.13 inches of water to about 0.15 inches of water at a velocity of about 300 feet per minute.
To provide for the flow of air and exhaust gases into air inlet 13, the removal means further comprises a blower 24 operably connected to ventilation hood 12. In accordance with one preferred embodiment of this invention, blower 24 is disposed downstream of water bath 14. In this embodiment, the air laden with cooking effluents is drawn into ventilation hood 12 through air inlet 13, drawn into contact with water bath 14, drawn through effluent removal assembly 30 and exhausted to the atmosphere through exhaust outlet 27. The suction pressure produced by blower 24 raises the water level within water bath 14 while reducing the water level within the outlet portion of air inlet 13, creating a low pressure drop. We have found that using less than 4 inches of W.C. pressure across blower 24, ventilation system 10 achieves about 80% to about 90% cooking effluent removal.
As shown in
A key to successful operation of the ventilation system of this invention is the location of the effluent removal assembly 30 with respect to water bath 14. Specifically, successful operation of the ventilation system requires that the effluent removal assembly 30 be disposed sufficiently close to the water bath 14 such that, during operation of the ventilation system, water from water bath 14 together with the cooking effluent laden air, is drawn into the porous web material 16, preferably to a degree such that porous web material 16 becomes substantially saturated with water. In accordance with one embodiment of this invention, a hydrophilic agent is applied to the porous web material to facilitate the introduction of the water from water bed 14 into the porous web material.
In accordance with one embodiment of this invention, a low-foaming surfactant, for example ELECTRASOL, is added to the water in water bath 14. The surfactant helps to solubilize otherwise non-soluble grease compounds and promotes the transfer of these grease compounds to the surrounding water, thus increasing the efficiency of ventilation system 10. Further, the surfactant eliminates or reduces the odors associated with the cooking effluents produced during operation of cooking appliance 11. Although any surfactant is applicable, specific surfactants include any selected from the group comprising ELECTRASOL, potassium permanganate, sodium hydrogen sulfite with sodium bicarbonate, and propylene glycol. Other suitable surfactants or chemical additives may be added to water bath 14 to promote solubilization of grease compounds and to provide an efficient means of odor control.
During operation of ventilation system 10, the amount of water in water bath 14 decreases, thereby reducing the overall efficiency thereof. Accordingly, to enable replenishment of the water from time to time, water bath 14 comprises a water inlet 21, which is connected to a water supply (not shown). Also during operation of ventilation system 10, it may be necessary to remove water for disposal of the effluents collected therein. To enable removal of the water, water bath 14 also comprises a water outlet or drain 22. In accordance with one embodiment of this invention, means are provided for removing the collected cooking effluents from the water and returning the water to water bath 14.
One important factor for efficiently removing the cooking effluents is the contact time between the cooking effluents and the water. In accordance with one embodiment of this invention, the velocity at which the air laden with cooking effluents moves through effluent removal assembly 30, referred to as airflow velocity, is preferably in the range of about 280 ft/min to about 480 ft/min, more preferably in the range of about 350 ft/min to about 375 ft/min in order to optimize the contact time. Other factors believed to affect the efficiency of ventilation system 10 include the surface area of the air bubbles produced by effluent removal assembly 30, the air bubble density (void volume), and the free surface area, i.e. the surface area at a waterline within water bath 14 available for bubbling. For example, in a 450 cfm system, the free surface area is preferably about 135 sq. inches to about 230 sq. inches, more preferably about 170 sq. inches to about 185 sq. inches.
In addition to the efficient removal of cooking effluents from the inlet airflow, ventilation system 10 also effectively reduces the temperature of the airflow, which promotes grease vapor condensation. Ventilation system 10 is an effective evaporative cooling device. In one preferred embodiment of this invention, the airflow temperature decreases as a result of achieving 100% saturation of the effluent removal assembly 30 as the airflow passes through water bath 14, wherein sensible heat is exchanged for latent heat of evaporation. Further, water bath 14 acts as a fire damper by restricting the propagation of a fire into blower 24.
The flow geometry of ventilation system 10, as shown in
While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for purpose of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the system and method according to this invention are susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of a patent application having Ser. No. 09/708,746 and a Filing Date of Nov. 7, 2000, now abandon.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1964794 | Gilbert | Jul 1934 | A |
1994766 | Heglar | Mar 1935 | A |
2000706 | Lowther | May 1935 | A |
2015174 | Anglemyer | Sep 1935 | A |
2021215 | Winslow | Nov 1935 | A |
2397525 | Bennett | Apr 1946 | A |
2405494 | Dupuy | Aug 1946 | A |
2409558 | Gunn | Oct 1946 | A |
2583252 | Carraway | Jan 1952 | A |
2596121 | Brixius | May 1952 | A |
2770320 | Dreznes | Nov 1956 | A |
2943920 | Hoover | Jul 1960 | A |
2966958 | Sexton | Jan 1961 | A |
2987138 | Walton | Jun 1961 | A |
3260189 | Jensen | Jul 1966 | A |
3282033 | Seppanian | Nov 1966 | A |
3381453 | Dills | May 1968 | A |
3481115 | Brandt | Dec 1969 | A |
3519947 | Sexton | Jul 1970 | A |
3537239 | Dunmire | Nov 1970 | A |
3642259 | Bowden | Feb 1972 | A |
3695005 | Yuzawa | Oct 1972 | A |
3756580 | Dunn | Sep 1973 | A |
3844748 | Lanier | Oct 1974 | A |
4116647 | Garner | Sep 1978 | A |
4290784 | Rawicki | Sep 1981 | A |
4351652 | Wisting | Sep 1982 | A |
4407266 | Molitor | Oct 1983 | A |
4432777 | Postma | Feb 1984 | A |
4859405 | Squarer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5078759 | Kira | Jan 1992 | A |
5141538 | Derington et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5358540 | Tsan-Yun et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5513722 | Foltz | May 1996 | A |
5908491 | Hobbs | Jun 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3644179 | Jul 1988 | DE |
0 194 343 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 213 031 | Mar 1987 | EP |
2 279 270 | Apr 1995 | GB |
55-18256 | Feb 1980 | JP |
56-165839 | Dec 1981 | JP |
59-179126 | Oct 1984 | JP |
60-232226 | Nov 1985 | JP |
05228392 | Sep 1993 | JP |
406015131 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06-39229 | Feb 1994 | JP |
407031823 | Feb 1995 | JP |
07318131 | Dec 1995 | JP |
409178237 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09271622 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10-216447 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11002414 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2000-126533 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-157821 | Jun 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020179084 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09708746 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10201840 | US |