This invention relates to seal assemblies. In particular, seal assemblies used in vacuum pumps and, more particularly, in multi-stage, oil free (dry) vacuum pumps.
Vacuum pumps are known which are oil-free in their vacuum chambers and which are therefore useful in clean environments such as those found in the semiconductor industry. In such a manufacturing environment, if lubricants were present in the vacuum chambers, these materials could potentially back migrate into the process chamber and, in so doing, may cause contamination of the product being manufactured. Such dry vacuum pumps are commonly multi-stage positive displacement pumps employing intermeshing rotors in each vacuum chamber. The rotors may have the same type of profile in each chamber or the profile may change from chamber to chamber.
In either a Roots or Northey (“claw”) type device, each chamber is typically formed from two separate machined stator components with the rotor components being located in the cavity formed there between. It is necessary to provide a sealing means between the two stator components in order to prevent leakage of the process gas from the pump and to prevent any ambient air from entering the pump. An o-ring is typically provided to perform this sealing function. However, given the harsh corrosive nature of the process gases these o-rings are readily attacked and need to be replaced frequently, thus causing costly servicing down times for the entire process. Furthermore, the contact surfaces of the stator can experience corrosion, which can lead to anomalies in these surfaces such that distortion of the pump case can occur. This distortion leads to a reduction in clearance between rotating and static components that, in turn, can affect the mechanical reliability of the pump.
Conventional systems are known which introduce mechanical barriers to protect the static sealing mechanism by preventing some of the hazardous/corrosive gaseous material from reaching the o-ring component. However, compatibility must be achieved between the material chosen to form this mechanical barrier and the process gas. Furthermore, additional complexity is introduced into the system by the presence of such a mechanical barrier and such a mechanical barrier will not generally protect the contact faces of the stators.
The present invention aims at overcoming the aforementioned problems by providing an alternative, simple means for protecting the sealing mechanism and the contacting stator faces.
According to the present invention there is provided a seal assembly for the protection of a static seal device for use in a vacuum pump, the seal assembly comprising:
at least two components to be sealingly connected together;
an o-ring seal, engaged between the two components to prevent transfer of fluid to and from the pump between these two components; and
a fluid channel in the plane of the o-ring and located between the o-ring seal and a process gas flow path, wherein the channel has a configuration to provide, in use, a path for a barrier fluid to be routed and the channel has an inlet connectable to an external source of barrier fluid and an outlet in fluid communication with a swept volume of the pump.
The fluid channel may be provided in one or both of the stator components and may comprise lateral channels to enhance radial leakage towards the cavity. The o-ring seal may be made from an elastomeric material and it may be located within the fluid channel. A vacuum pump comprising a plurality of stator components maybe provided where, each pair of stator components are positioned in relation to one another to provide a cavity therbetween. Process gases may pass through this cavity in use. A seal assembly of the invention may be included for providing a fluid tight seal between adjacent stator components.
An example of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As in conventional pumps of this type, an o-ring seal 4 is provided around the periphery of the cavity. This seal 4 provides a fluid tight seal between adjacent stator components such that process gases are prevented from escaping from the cavity 2 and ambient air is prevented from entering the cavity when the pump is in use. However, these process gases can be particularly aggressive and readily cause damage to both the o-ring seal 4 and the contacting surfaces 3 of the stator components.
In this example of the present invention the o-ring 4 is made of an elastomeric material and is located within a groove 5. This groove is machined in the surface 3 of the stator component. An additional channel 6 is formed in the contact surface 3 of the stator component 1. This channel 6 is located between the o-ring groove 5 and the cavity 2 through which, in use, process gases will pass.
A pump is typically supplied with a purge gas, this gas being chosen to be unreactive under the given conditions, such as Nitrogen. This purge gas serves to dilute the process gases in the pump to maintain the partial pressure of the process gas below the saturated value at which condensation may start to form. It is desirable to prevent such condensation as this may lead to corrosion of pump components or, alternatively, may lead to deposits being formed within the clearances between the rotor and the stator components. Such effects lead to a reduction in pump reliability as tolerances can be affected and, in an extreme case, seizure may occur, especially during restart of the pump after some shut down. In some pumps such a purge gas is introduced directly into the cavity 2 through purge fluid inlet 7 via the interstage aperture 9 (as illustrated in
In the present invention this conventional purge fluid inlet 7 is blocked using a plug 10 (as shown in
The pressure gradient between the barrier gas and the process gas will further inhibit the process gas from coming into contact with the o-ring seal 4. If, however, some transient condition is experienced, the favourable pressure gradient may not be maintained. In such a situation some process gas may come into contact with the o-ring seal 4. In these conditions, the barrier gas will serve to dilute the potentially corrosive process fluid such that its harmful impact on the o-ring seal 4 is significantly reduced. Furthermore, if such conditions do arise, whereby the protected area becomes contaminated, the barrier gas will flush the area clean once the transient condition is removed.
a shows a section of a pump according to the present invention. This figure illustrates how multiple stator sections 1 are positioned adjacent to each other to form a series of cavities 2. The elastomeric seal 4 is located in groove 5 to provide a fluid tight seal. The channel 6 is positioned radially inwards of the seal 4 in order to provide the protective layer between the cavity 2 and the seal 4 and to allow purge gas to flush the region between contact surfaces 3, in use.
In an alternative example of the present invention the channel 6 and the groove 5 could be combined in a single feature such that the channel, accommodates both the barrier gas and the o-ring seal 4, as illustrated in
There is a requirement for the materials used in the fabrication of the mechanical barrier of the conventional sealing means to be suited to the particular aggressive process gases that are likely to be encountered by that pump. By using an unreactive gas barrier as provided by the present invention, a greater range of compatibility with different process gases can be achieved such that this selection function is simplified. Furthermore, whereas the pump would need to be dismantled to change the mechanical barrier to one of a different composition, it is straightforward to substitute an alternative compatible purge/barrier gas if a different process is to be undertaken. Indeed, this flexibility can be used to greater advantage in diverse processes where a range of potentially incompatible materials is to be used that may require switching to an alternative purge gas. Since the purge gas also acts as the barrier gas the selection of materials has already been performed and can, therefore, be regarded as compatible.
Since conventional mechanical barriers are attacked by aggressive process gases, the conventional barrier has a limited service life. Replacement of these barriers and seals leads to costly disruption of the manufacturing process. However, the barrier gas of the present invention is constantly replenished and thus does not contribute to the servicing interval of the pumping apparatus.
A further advantage of the present invention is in protecting the contacting surfaces of adjacent stator components. When these, generally metal, surfaces come into contact with the aggressive process gases, corrosion will occur. Since the corrosion product occupies a bigger volume than the original metal, the metal surfaces swell as they corrode. This increase in volume forces adjacent stator components to separate from each other. When viewed from the side (as in
A conventional mechanical barrier is positioned so as to protect the elastomeric seal and does not give any protection to the contacting surfaces of adjacent stator components. Leakage of some of the barrier gas used to protect the elastomeric seal in the present invention occurs across these contacting faces, indeed as illustrated in
In exceptionally harsh environments where the process gases are particularly aggressive the present invention may be combined, in series, with conventional mechanical barrier devices or further gas barriers to further improve the protection of the o-ring seal.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0310615.0 | May 2003 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2004/001955 | 5/6/2004 | WO | 00 | 11/8/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/099620 | 11/18/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4789314 | Higuchi et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4990069 | Guittet et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5173041 | Niimura et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5567140 | Dodd | Oct 1996 | A |
5816782 | Nagayama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6123526 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6572351 | Durand et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20020155014 | Durand et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
356168 | Dec 1930 | GB |
04050492 | Feb 1992 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060216186 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |