The present invention relates generally to roofing shingles, and more particularly, to an asphaltic sealant that seals at temperatures lower than conventional sealants and that promotes the easy release of the shingle from a shingle bundle.
Asphalt-based roofing materials, such as roofing shingles, roll roofing, and built-up roofing, are installed on the roofs of buildings and residential dwellings to provide protection from the elements. The use of adhesives, including asphaltic compounds, to provide a bond between roofing shingles when they are attached to a roof is well-known. During a typical shingle manufacturing process, a pattern of adhesive is applied to the headlap portion of the shingles so that the tab portion of the subsequently laid course of shingles on the roof will adhere to the headlap portion of the lower course. This seal is to help prevent wind from uplifting the shingles.
To seal properly, most conventional sealants or adhesives require relatively high roof temperatures. Indeed, many conventional adhesives require roof temperatures of about 135° F. or higher to activate the sealant. In relatively colder climates, these roof temperatures may not be reached until seasons subsequent to installation, which conceivably could be months later. Thus, under conditions where relatively low temperatures do not permit proper sealing of the adhesive, the shingles may not be properly sealed. Another problem with conventional sealants is that colder temperatures tend to cause the sealant on the sealed shingles to become brittle and crack, resulting in bond failure.
A further problem associated with conventional sealants is that the sealant may bond the shingles together when they are in a packaged or bundled formation, such as, for example, for shipping and storing. A shingle having thereon an overly aggressive sealant will not only bond to the tab portion of the shingle when placed on a roof, it will also bond to the release tape of the adjacent shingle within the packaged shingle bundle. Such bonding may not only damage the shingle as the shingles are pried apart, it may cause frustration to the consumer trying to separate the shingles.
Although attempts have been made to address the temperature sealing problem of conventional adhesives and the over aggressiveness of the sealants, there remains a need in the art for an asphalt sealant that provides a quick and good seal at low roof temperatures, that is not overly aggressive so as to bond to the release tape in a packaged formation, that has a high bond strength to provide good resistance to shingle uplift, that does not pose any additional health or safety issues, is cost effective, and where the performance of the sealant is sustainable over time.
In some embodiments, an adhesive sealant composition that includes a base asphalt, a linear copolymer and/or a radial copolymer, an oil, and a wax is provided. The base asphalt used in the inventive sealant composition may be a viscosity graded asphalt, such as AC-10 or AC-20, or a paving graded asphalt, such as PG58 or PG64. The radial copolymer may have an (A-B)n radial structure, where n is an integer of at least 4, or a tri-block (A-B-A) radial structure having from 4-8 arms. The linear copolymer may have an A-B di-block structure or an A-B-A tri-block structure. Blocks A and B may individually represent (1) styrene and butadiene or (2) styrene and isoprene. The oil is a petroleum-based oil that both “softens” the asphalt in the composition and reduces the viscosity of the adhesive sealant composition. In some exemplary embodiments, the sealant composition also contains a wax. Such as a bis-stearamide wax. The wax may be N, N′-ethylenebis-stearamide, which is commercially available from Lonza, Inc. The inventive sealant composition maintains sufficient tack at lower temperatures to provide a good bond during installation. In addition, the sealant composition seals the shingles at roof temperatures that are lower than conventional sealants and provides good resistance to shingle uplift.
In other embodiments, roofing shingles that includes a tab portion, upper headlap portion, a release tape positioned on a rear portion of the headlap portion are provided, and a sealant composition positioned on a rear portion of the tab portion are provided. The sealant composition includes (1) a hydrocarbonaceous material, (2) a linear copolymer having an A-B di-block or an A-B-A tri-block structure and/or a radial copolymer that is selected from a block copolymer having an (A-B)n radial structure where n is an integer of at least 4 and a block copolymer having a tri-block (A-B-A) radial structure having from 4-8 arms, (3) an oil, and (4) a bis-stearamide wax. In addition, the sealant composition may contain sulfur as a crosslinking agent. The sealant provides for more flexibility at lower temperatures, such as temperatures lower than or equal to about 40° F.
In further embodiments, bundles of roofing shingles that includes a plurality of pairs of roofing shingles suitable for installing on roofs are provided. Each of the roofing shingles includes a tab portion, an upper headlap portion, a release tape positioned on a first portion of the shingle, and a sealant positioned on second portion of the shingle. The shingles in the pairs are positioned such that the sealant on a first shingle of the pair aligns with the release tape of a second shingle in the pair. In exemplary embodiments, the release tape is positioned on a rear portion of the headlap portion and the sealant composition is positioned a rear portion of the tab portion. The sealant releases the first shingle from the second shingle in said pair. The sealant composition includes (1) a hydrocarbonaceous material, (2) a linear copolymer having an A-B di-block or an A-B-A tri-block structure and/or a radial copolymer that is selected from a block copolymer having an (A-B)n radial structure where n is an integer of at least 4 and a block copolymer having a tri-block (A-B-A) radial structure having from 4-8 arms, (3) an oil, and (4) a bis-stearamide wax.
It is an advantage of the present inventions that the asphaltic sealant seals shingles at temperatures lower than conventional sealants.
It is another advantage of the present inventions that the inclusion of wax reduces high temperature aggressiveness without adversely affecting bonding performance.
It is a further advantage of the present inventions that the sealant provides for more flexibility at lower temperatures, such as temperatures lower than or equal to about 40° F.
It is also an advantage of the present inventions that the sealant improves adhesion without adversely affecting the physical and performance properties of the asphalt.
It is also an advantage of the present inventions that the sealant composition does not pose any safety or health issues to workers involved in their manufacture and/or application.
It is another advantage of the present inventions that the performance of the adhesive sealant composition is sustainable over time.
It is also an advantage of the present inventions that the asphaltic adhesive is useful in winter applications and in colder climates.
It is yet another advantage of the present inventions that the sealant has excellent bead shape retention.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the inventions will appear more fully hereinafter from a consideration of the detailed description that follows.
The advantages of these inventions will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed disclosure of the invention, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention belongs. All references cited herein, including published or corresponding U.S. or foreign patent applications, issued U.S. or foreign patents, or any other references, are each incorporated by reference in their entireties, including all data, tables, figures, and text presented in the cited references. The terms “sealant”, “sealant composition”, “adhesive sealant composition”, “inventive sealant”, “inventive sealant composition”, “asphaltic sealant composition” and “roofing sealant composition” may be interchangeably used herein.
The present invention relates to an asphaltic sealant composition for roofing shingles that includes a base asphalt, a linear copolymer and/or a radial copolymer, an oil, and a wax, and optionally one or more fillers. The adhesive sealant seals at temperatures lower than conventional sealants and permits the shingle to be easily removed from a packaged bundle of shingles. The inclusion of the wax in the asphaltic sealant composition permits the release of the shingle from the release tape of the adjacent shingle in the bundle without impacting the ability of the shingle to bond to another shingle when applied to a roof. Although the sealant effectively seals at higher roof temperatures, it may be particularly useful in winter applications and in cold, northern climates. In addition, the adhesive sealant provides good resistance to shingle lift-up and flexibility at lower temperatures, such as temperatures lower than or equal to about 40° F.
The sealant contains, as one component, a base asphalt or other hydrocarbonaceous material. As used herein, the term “asphalt” is meant to include any of a variety of materials that are solid or semi-solid materials at room temperature that gradually liquefy when heated and are formed predominantly of naturally occurring bitumens obtained as residue in petroleum refining. The base asphalt used in the inventive sealant composition is desirably a viscosity graded asphalt, such as AC-10 or AC-20, or a paving graded asphalt, such as PG58 or PG64, which are commercially available from British Petroleum and Conoco Philips. The base asphalt may be generally present in the sealant composition in an amount from about 74.0% to about 90.5% by weight of the composition. In some embodiments, the base asphalt may be present in the sealant composition in an amount from about 81% to about 88% by weight of the composition. As used herein, and unless defined otherwise, the phrase “% by weight” is meant to denote % by weight of the total sealant composition.
As discussed above, the sealant composition contains a linear copolymer and/or a radial copolymer, each of which is described in detail below. The copolymers are thermoplastic and are selected for their ability to impart strength to the sealant at colder temperatures. As with conventional thermoplastic organic polymers, the copolymers used in the inventive sealant can be processed (i.e., melted and extruded) and can be repeatedly heated and cooled with no substantial loss in their properties, including elastomeric properties. Accordingly, the copolymers used herein substantially retain their properties when subjected to heating and cooling cycles. One particular advantageous feature is the ability of the copolymers to retain strength upon cooling the copolymers, which gives strength and flexibility to the sealant at colder temperatures.
The adhesive sealant composition contains a linear copolymer having an A-B di-block or an A-B-A tri-block structure. In particular, the linear copolymer has a di-block content greater than 50%. Blocks A and B may individually represent (1) styrene and butadiene or (2) styrene and isoprene. Either block, A or B, may include more than one monomer. Additionally, each block segment may include 100 or more monomer units. The linear copolymer may have a styrene content of less than 50%, or from about 20% to about 40% styrene, or from about 20% to about 35% styrene. In some exemplary embodiments, the linear copolymer has a styrene/butadiene ratio of 33/67. In some examples the linear copolymer has styrene or polystyrene as the A block or end block units. Suitable copolymers include styrene-butadiene block copolymers and styrene-isoprene block copolymers. Specific, non-limiting examples include D1118K, a styrene-butadiene-styrene di-block copolymer, and D1113K, and D1119K, styrene-isoprene-styrene linear polymers with a high-di-block content (all are commercially available from Kraton®). In some embodiments, the linear copolymer is a styrene-butadiene di-block copolymer, such as D1118K, commercially available from Kraton®. The linear di-block copolymer may be present in the inventive sealant composition in an amount from about 2.5% to about 11.0% by weight of the composition. In other embodiments, the linear copolymer is present in the sealant composition in an amount from about 2.5% to about 6.5% by weight of the composition. In some exemplary embodiments, the linear copolymer may be present in the sealant composition in a greater amount, such as, for example, from about 10-14% by weight of the composition, or from 11.0-12.0% by weight.
The radial copolymer may have an (A-B)n radial structure, where n is an integer of at least 4, or from 4-20, or a tri-block (A-B-A) radial structure having from 4-8 arms. Block copolymers are well known and are described in numerous patents, including, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,884 to Algrim, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,880 to Algrim, et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,759,454 to Stephens, et al., each of which is incorporated by reference in their entirety. Similar to the linear copolymer, block A and/or B in the radial copolymer may include more than one monomer and each block segment may include 100 or more monomer units. Additionally, blocks A and B may individually represent (1) styrene and butadiene or (2) styrene and isoprene. It is desirable that the radial polymer have styrene or polystyrene as the A block or end block units. The radial copolymer may have a styrene content of less than 50%, or from about 20% to about 40% styrene, or from about 20% to about 35% styrene. In some embodiments, the styrene/butadiene ratio is 31/69.
Exemplary radial copolymers include D4158K (includes 33% oil), D1184K, D1116K, and D1144K, all of which are styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) radial copolymers (commercially available from Kraton®), and D1124K and D1126P, both of which are styrene-isoprene radial copolymers (commercially available from Kraton®). In some embodiments, the radial copolymer is a styrene-butadiene radial copolymer, such as D4158K or D1184K (commercially available from Kraton®). The radial copolymer may be present in the adhesive sealant composition in an amount from 0% to about 9.0% by weight of the composition. In exemplary embodiments, the radial copolymer may be present in the sealant composition in an amount from about 3.5% to about 7.0% by weight of the composition.
When both a linear and a radial copolymer are present in the inventive sealant, the total amount of the radial copolymer and the linear copolymer present in the sealant composition may range from about 6.5% to about 14.0%, or from about 8.0% to about 11.0% of the total composition. Additionally, the ratio of radial copolymer to linear copolymer present in the adhesive sealant composition may range from 6:3 to 2:6 (radial copolymer:linear copolymer). In some embodiments, the ratio of radial copolymer to linear copolymer present in the sealant composition is 5:4.
Another component present in the sealant composition is an oil. The oil can be any oil recognized in the art to enhance the “softness” of the asphalt in the adhesive sealant composition. The oil also aids in reducing the viscosity of the sealant composition. In general, the oil is added in an amount necessary to achieve a desired viscosity for the sealant composition and to improve low temperature bonding. The viscosity of the sealant composition desirably does not exceed approximately 1500 cps as measured by a Brookfield LVF Viscometer using spindle number 7 at 350° F. The oil utilized in the sealant composition may be a petroleum-based oil or other naphthenic or paraffinic oils identified by one of ordinary skill in the art. One particularly useful oil is HYDROLENE SP-125 petroleum-based oil, a severely solvent modified heavy petroleum oil commercially available from Sunoco, Inc. (CAS No. 63741-88-4). The oil may be present in the adhesive sealant composition in a total amount from about 2.0% to about 7.0% of the total sealant composition, or from about 4.0% to about 6.0%. It is to be appreciated that a portion of the total oil content may be derived from another component of the sealant composition, such as, for example, an oil-containing copolymer.
A further component of the sealant composition is a wax. In some embodiments, the sealant composition is excessively aggressive at higher temperatures, such as temperatures above 110° F. It has been surprisingly and unexpectedly discovered that the addition of an ethylene bis-stearamide wax reduced high temperature aggressiveness without adversely affecting bonding performance. The wax may be a bis-stearamide wax. These waxes have a unique and surprising property of “blooming” to the surface of the sealant, such as the sealant bead. More specifically, after the sealant has been applied to the appropriate portion of the shingle and the sealant begins to cool, the wax “blooms” to the surface of the sealant bead and crystallizes, forming a waxy surface to the bead. The wax functions to reduce the overall amount of tack at the surface of the sealant. In at least one exemplary embodiment, the wax is an N, N′-ethylenebis-stearamide wax commercially available from Lonza, Inc. In exemplary embodiments, the wax may be present in an amount from about 0.2% to about 5.0% of the total composition, from about 0.50% to about 3.0%, from about 0.5% to about 3.0%, or from about 0.6% to about 2.5%, or from about 0.7% to about 0.8%. In at least one embodiment, the wax is present in an amount of about 0.75% by weight of the total composition.
In some exemplary embodiments, fillers may be added to any of the adhesive roofing sealant compositions. For example, up to about 30% by weight of a filler may be used. Suitable fillers include, but are not limited to, limestone (calcium carbonate), dolomite (calcium magnesium carbonate), wollastonite, talc, silica, and others known to those skilled in the art. The filler may have a median particle size from about 5 microns to about 50 microns, or from about 10 microns to about 30 microns.
One asphaltic adhesive roofing sealant composition is set forth in Table 1.
(1)performance grade asphalt (commercially available from British Petroleum and Conoco Philips)
(2)styrene-isoprene-styrene tri-block copolymer (commercially available from Kraton ®)
(4)petroleum-based oil (commercially available from Sunoco, Inc.)
(5)N,N′-ethylenebis-stearamide wax (commercially available from Lonza, Inc.)
A second adhesive roofing sealant composition is set forth in Table 2.
(1)performance grade asphalt (commercially available from British Petroleum and Conoco Philips)
(2)styrene-butadiene radial copolymer containing oil (commercially available from Kraton ®)
(3)styrene-butadiene di-block copolymer (commercially available from Kraton ®)
(4)petroleum-based oil (commercially available from Sunoco, Inc.)
(5)N,N′-ethylenebis-stearamide wax (commercially available from Lonza, Inc.)
A third adhesive roofing sealant composition set forth in Table 3. The inventive sealant compositions described herein can be reacted with elemental sulfur to vulcanize in situ. Table 3 depicts an exemplary composition containing a mixture of two linear copolymers (i.e., di-block and tri-block styrene-butadiene copolymers). After dispersion in the base asphalt and oil, the copolymer blend may be crosslinked with sulfur. The addition of the sulfur to polymer modified asphalts enhances dispersion stability and improves mechanical properties.
(1)performance grade asphalt (commercially available from British Petroleum and Conoco Philips)
(2)styrene-butadiene-styrene linear tri-block copolymer (commercially available from Kraton ®)
(3)styrene-butadiene di-block copolymer (commercially available from Kraton ®)
(4)petroleum-based oil (commercially available from Sunoco, Inc.)
(5)N,N′-ethylenebis-stearamide wax (commercially available from Lonza, Inc.)
Conventional mixing or blending techniques may be used to make the sealant composition. In at least one exemplary embodiment, the base asphalt is heated to a temperature of approximately 350° F. and the oil is blended into the molten asphalt. A blend of the radial copolymer and linear copolymer is added to the molten asphalt/oil to form a mixture. The mixture is then placed into a conventional milling apparatus where the polymers are sheared into smaller polymeric pieces. The mixture is ground in the milling apparatus for a period of time sufficient to mill (grind) the polymers to a size that is no longer visible to the naked eye when viewed as a thin film. The wax may be added to the asphalt/oil mixture after the polymeric blend is milled. The sealant composition is cooled for packaging and then melted for application to a shingle. It may be desirable to circulate and maintain the adhesive at an elevated temperature during processing and application to the shingles to aid in the prevention of phase separation.
The sealant composition may be applied to any roofing shingle that is designed to be laid down in courses or layers, with at least a portion of successive layers of the shingles overlapping. The shingle may be any conventional shingle known in the art; however, more particularly suited shingles are those shingles made of glass fiber reinforced asphalt, such as, but not limited to, the shingles described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0042158 to Belt, et al. For instance, the shingle may be a granule covered roofing shingle having a lower tab portion, an upper headlap portion, a first end, and a second end. Such a shingle is suitable for installing on roofs end-to-end (or side-by-side) with similar shingles in overlapping longitudinal courses.
A non-limiting example of a shingle containing the inventive sealant composition is illustrated in
In use, the shingle 10 is placed on a roof (not shown) with the bottom side facing down towards the roof and is securely nailed to the roof by nailing or otherwise mechanically affixing the shingle 10 through the nail strip 16. A series of shingles 10 are placed on the roof in a horizontal manner across the roof to form a first course of shingles. A second course of shingles is then affixed to the roof by positioning these shingles over the first course of shingles such that the tab portion 14 of the shingles forming the second course overlaps the headlap portion 12 and nail strip 16 of the first course of shingles. The shingles forming the second course are then nailed to the roof though the nail strip 16 as described above. This process is repeated until the installer reaches the top of the roof. The sealant 18 adheres the tab portion 14 to the headlap portion 12 and/or the nail strip 16 of the shingle 10 in the course located directly below the shingle 10, thereby preventing “lift off” of the shingles 10 by high wind. In cases where there is an asphaltic coating to which the sealant adheres (not illustrated), the sealant also integrates into the asphaltic coating to provide a mechanical adhesion as well as an adhesion by the components forming the sealant composition.
The sealant not only seals and adheres the shingles after placement of the shingles on the roof, the sealant improves the releasability of the shingles when the shingles are stacked or placed in a bundle, such as for shipping and/or storing. The shingles 10 within the bundle are positioned in pairs of two such that the sealant 18 lines up with the release tape 20 of a previously positioned shingle, as depicted in
As discussed above, the sealant may be applied to the shingle in any manner, such as in a continuous strip or as a plurality of beads, dashes, other in some other discontinuous manner. The packaging or bundling of shingles having thereon conventional sealants may lead to severe sticking of the shingles inside the bundle, even in the presence of release tape. However, the inventive sealant improves the ability of a worker to release the shingle from the bundle with relative ease. The sealant functions within the package of shingles to prevent or reduce the occurrence of individual shingles adhering to each other within the bundle. Additionally, the adhesive improves flexibility and bonding, even at temperatures lower than or equal to about 40° F.
The sealant composition of the present invention provides numerous advantages, such as, for example, the ability to provide a good initial bond during installation and to seal shingles at roof temperatures that are lower than conventional sealants. It is also advantageous that the sealant composition permits the shingle to be easily removed from the packaged shingle bundle. As discussed in detail above, the wax present in the sealant composition forms a waxy surface on the sealant, which allows for a quick and easy release from the release tape of the adjacent shingle in the package of shingles. The sealant formulation provides lower sealing temperatures than traditional sealants, and maintains excellent flexibility at low temperatures. Additionally, the wax causes the sealant composition to possess excellent bead shape retention compared to identical formulations with no wax additive. Also, the sealant composition has little or no toxicity or safety issues, and, as a result, no additional safety precautions or equipment are needed to apply the sealant to a roofing shingle.
Having generally described this invention, a further understanding can be obtained by reference to certain specific examples illustrated below which are provided for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be all inclusive or limiting unless otherwise specified.
Materials Required:
Aluminum Panel (˜6″×3″)
PET film (Cut into pieces 6″ long)
Small (6″×6″) heated press (w/1 mm shims) set @ 260° F.
Adhesive Roller (10 pound) (preheated to 140° F.)
Silicone Release Paper
Oven @ 140° F.
Refrigerator @ 40° F. (or variable down to 0° F.)
Sealant or Adhesive (both unknowns and controls)
Procedure:
20 g of molten adhesive was poured onto an 8″×8″ piece of silicone release paper such that the adhesive was on one half of the paper, not in the center (so the paper can be folded in half prior to pressing). The material was allowed to cool for at least 20 minutes. Next, the paper was folded in half so that one half of the paper covered the adhesive. The folded paper was then placed into a press and pressed until the shims were contacted. The material was permitted to sit in the press for approximately 1 minute. The pressure was then released and the paper was removed.
The folded, pressed paper was placed into a refrigerator at approximately 40° F. for about 10 minutes to allow the adhesive to cool. Immediately after removing the paper from the refrigerator, the paper was cut into 4 strips having a size of 1 cm×6 cm. The release paper was then removed from the cut strips. Next, two strips were placed on an aluminum panel about 5 mm from the edge. One piece of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film was centered over the adhesive strip such the edges of the film did not overlap the center of the panel. The panels were then placed into an oven, taking care not to remove the tape.
After 30 minutes in the oven, one panel at a time was removed along with a pre-heated 10 pound roller. The roller was manually rolled over each strip (individually four times—2 up and 2 back). This rolling process was repeated for all panels in the oven. Once the panels were pressed, the panels were all placed into the refrigerator at a pre-selected temperature for a period of not less than 12 hours and not more than 18 hours. The time for each panel was recorded. After the allotted period of time, each panel was removed and the tape was manually removed. Observations regarding the panel, tape, and releasability, as well as any other visual or physical observations of the inventive sealants, were noted and recorded.
The releasability of the panels was rated on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows:
5: The tape showed strong bond showing no adhesive or cohesive failure. PET tape could not be removed
4: The tape showed initial bonding requiring some effort to pull apart. Once bond was broken, there was evidence of cohesive failure (some adhesive left on the tape).
3: The tape showed initial bonding requiring moderate effort to pull apart. Once the bond was broken, the tape showed adhesive failure.
2: The tape showed initial bonding requiring little effort to pull apart. Once bond was broken, the tape showed adhesive failure.
1: The tape showed no initial bonding. The tape peeled off with very little effort.
The observation collected recorded are set forth in Table 5.
The control adhesive is a standard sealant formulation that is much less aggressive compared to the inventive sealant formulation. This experiment was designed to simply describe the performance of several variations of the inventive sealant with respect to adhesion to a simple, unmodified polyester film. The temperature was lowered to allow for differentiation between sealants as well as to understand the impact of temperature on sealant flexibility. Although subjective, the experiment shows that aggressiveness toward the film can be modified substantially with addition of wax. In addition, visual inspection of the sealant strips containing the wax shows a significant reduction in glossiness of the surface as compared to the samples that did not contain wax, confirming the blooming of the wax to the surface of the adhesive strip.
The invention of this application has been described above both generically and with regard to specific embodiments. Therefore, it is to be understood that a wide variety of alternatives known to those of skill in the art can be selected within the generic disclosure.
This application is related to and claims domestic priority benefits from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/161,996 entitled “Low Temperature Shingle Sealant Composition” filed Mar. 20, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/162,111 entitled “Low Temperature Shingle Sealant Composition” filed Mar. 20, 2009, the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
81579 | Bailey | Sep 1868 | A |
356161 | Ricketson | Jan 1887 | A |
D48172 | DunLany | Nov 1915 | S |
1447750 | Bird | Mar 1923 | A |
1495070 | Finley | May 1924 | A |
1516243 | Perry | Nov 1924 | A |
1549723 | Mattison | Aug 1925 | A |
1565693 | Robinson | May 1926 | A |
1583563 | Abraham | May 1926 | A |
1597135 | Wittenberg | Aug 1926 | A |
1601731 | Flood | Oct 1926 | A |
1665222 | Robinson | Apr 1928 | A |
1666429 | Stolp, Jr. | Apr 1928 | A |
1676351 | Robinson | Jul 1928 | A |
1698891 | Overbury | Jan 1929 | A |
1701926 | Kirschbraun | Feb 1929 | A |
1799500 | Brophy | Apr 1931 | A |
1802868 | Roscoe | Apr 1931 | A |
1843370 | Overbury | Feb 1932 | A |
1860899 | Denton | May 1932 | A |
1885346 | Harshberger | Nov 1932 | A |
1897139 | Overbury | Feb 1933 | A |
1898989 | Harshberger | Feb 1933 | A |
1984529 | Harshberger | Dec 1934 | A |
2058167 | McQuade | Oct 1936 | A |
2161440 | Venrick | Jun 1939 | A |
2490430 | Greider et al. | Dec 1949 | A |
2798006 | Oldfield et al. | Jul 1957 | A |
2847948 | Truitt | Aug 1958 | A |
3054222 | Buckner | Sep 1962 | A |
3127701 | Jastrzemski | Apr 1964 | A |
3138897 | McCorkle | Jun 1964 | A |
3252257 | Price et al. | May 1966 | A |
3332830 | Tomlinson et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3377762 | Chalmers | Apr 1968 | A |
3468086 | Warner | Sep 1969 | A |
3468092 | Chalmers | Sep 1969 | A |
3624975 | Morgan et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3664081 | Martin et al. | May 1972 | A |
3813280 | Olszyk et al. | May 1974 | A |
154334 | Overbury | Aug 1974 | A |
3913294 | Freiborg | Oct 1975 | A |
4091135 | Tajima et al. | May 1978 | A |
4194335 | Diamond | Mar 1980 | A |
4195461 | Thiis-Evensen | Apr 1980 | A |
4274243 | Corbin et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4301633 | Neumann | Nov 1981 | A |
4307552 | Votte | Dec 1981 | A |
4333279 | Corbin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
D265510 | Bedwell, Jr. | Jul 1982 | S |
4352837 | Kopenhaver | Oct 1982 | A |
4366197 | Hanlon et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4404783 | Freiborg | Sep 1983 | A |
4434589 | Freiborg | Mar 1984 | A |
4439955 | Freiborg | Apr 1984 | A |
4459157 | Koons | Jul 1984 | A |
4527374 | Corbin | Jul 1985 | A |
4580389 | Freiborg | Apr 1986 | A |
4637191 | Smith | Jan 1987 | A |
4672790 | Freiborg | Jun 1987 | A |
4680909 | Stewart | Jul 1987 | A |
4706435 | Stewart | Nov 1987 | A |
4717614 | Bondoc et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738884 | Algrim et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4755545 | Lalwani | Jul 1988 | A |
4789066 | Lisiecki | Dec 1988 | A |
D300257 | Stahl | Mar 1989 | S |
4817358 | Lincoln et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4824880 | Algrim et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4835929 | Bondoc et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848057 | MacDonald et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4856251 | Buck | Aug 1989 | A |
4869942 | Jennus et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
D309027 | Noone et al. | Jul 1990 | S |
D313278 | Noone | Dec 1990 | S |
5036119 | Berggren | Jul 1991 | A |
5039755 | Chamberlain et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5065553 | Magid | Nov 1991 | A |
5082704 | Higgins | Jan 1992 | A |
5094042 | Freiborg | Mar 1992 | A |
5181361 | Hannah et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195290 | Hulett | Mar 1993 | A |
5209802 | Hannah et al. | May 1993 | A |
5232530 | Malmquist et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239802 | Robinson | Aug 1993 | A |
5247771 | Poplin | Sep 1993 | A |
D340294 | Hannah et al. | Oct 1993 | S |
5271201 | Noone et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5295340 | Collins | Mar 1994 | A |
D347900 | Stapleton | Jun 1994 | S |
5319898 | Freiborg | Jun 1994 | A |
5365711 | Pressutti et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369929 | Weaver et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375387 | Davenport | Dec 1994 | A |
5375388 | Poplin | Dec 1994 | A |
5400558 | Hannah et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5419941 | Noone et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426902 | Stahl et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5467568 | Sieling | Nov 1995 | A |
5471801 | Kupczyk | Dec 1995 | A |
D366124 | Hannah et al. | Jan 1996 | S |
5488807 | Terrenzio et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
D369421 | Kiik et al. | Apr 1996 | S |
D375563 | Hannah et al. | Nov 1996 | S |
5570556 | Wagner | Nov 1996 | A |
5571596 | Johnson | Nov 1996 | A |
5575876 | Noone et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577361 | Grabek, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
D376660 | Hannah et al. | Dec 1996 | S |
5611186 | Weaver | Mar 1997 | A |
5615523 | Wells et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624522 | Belt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
D379672 | Lamb et al. | Jun 1997 | S |
5651734 | Morris | Jul 1997 | A |
5660014 | Stahl et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
D383223 | Sieling et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5664385 | Koschitzky | Sep 1997 | A |
5666776 | Weaver et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676597 | Bettoli et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5711126 | Wells et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5746830 | Burton | May 1998 | A |
5795389 | Koschitzky | Aug 1998 | A |
5799459 | Covert | Sep 1998 | A |
D400268 | Sieling et al. | Oct 1998 | S |
5822943 | Frankoski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D400981 | Bondoc et al. | Nov 1998 | S |
D403087 | Sieling et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
5853858 | Bondoc | Dec 1998 | A |
5860263 | Sieling et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
D406361 | Bondoc et al. | Mar 1999 | S |
5901517 | Stahl et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916103 | Roberts | Jun 1999 | A |
5939169 | Bondoc et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950387 | Stahl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D417016 | Moore et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
D417513 | Blanpied | Dec 1999 | S |
6010589 | Stahl et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014847 | Phillips | Jan 2000 | A |
6021611 | Wells et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038826 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044608 | Stahl et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070384 | Chich | Jun 2000 | A |
6083592 | Chich | Jul 2000 | A |
6105329 | Bondoc et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
RE36858 | Pressutti et al. | Sep 2000 | E |
6112492 | Wells et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125602 | Freiborg et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145265 | Malarkey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148578 | Nowacek et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156289 | Chopra | Dec 2000 | A |
6182400 | Freiborg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185895 | Rettew | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190754 | Bondoc et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199338 | Hudson, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220329 | King et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247289 | Karpinia | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253512 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6310122 | Butler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343447 | Geissels et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6351913 | Freiborg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355132 | Becker et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361851 | Sieling et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397546 | Malarkey et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6397556 | Karpinia | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401425 | Frame | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426309 | Miller et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6467235 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471812 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D466629 | Phillips | Dec 2002 | S |
6487828 | Phillips | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494010 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510664 | Kupczyk | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523316 | Stahl et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530189 | Freshwater et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
D473326 | Phillips | Apr 2003 | S |
6565431 | Villela | May 2003 | B1 |
6578336 | Elliott | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6610147 | Aschenbeck | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6652909 | Lassiter | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679020 | Becker et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679308 | Becker et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691489 | Frame | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703120 | Ko | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708456 | Kiik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709760 | Trumbore et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709994 | Miller et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725609 | Freiborg et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6758019 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6759454 | Stephens et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790307 | Elliott | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804919 | Railkar | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813866 | Naipawer, III | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823637 | Elliott et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6895724 | Naipawer, III | May 2005 | B2 |
6933037 | McCumber et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936329 | Kiik et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6990779 | Kiik et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021468 | Cargile | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029739 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037295 | Tiernan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048990 | Koschitzky | May 2006 | B2 |
7070051 | Kanner et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073295 | Pressutti et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082724 | Railkar et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118794 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121055 | Penner | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124548 | Pressutti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146771 | Swann | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165363 | Headrick, II et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7238408 | Aschenbeck et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267862 | Burke et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7282536 | Handlin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7556849 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D610720 | Elliott | Feb 2010 | S |
7765763 | Teng et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7781046 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7805905 | Rodrigues et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820237 | Harrington, Jr. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836654 | Belt et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
D633221 | Koch | Feb 2011 | S |
D633222 | Koch | Feb 2011 | S |
7877949 | Elliott | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7909235 | Holley, Jr. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921606 | Quaranta et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8006457 | Binkley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8127514 | Binkley et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8181413 | Belt et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8216407 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240102 | Belt et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266861 | Koch et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281520 | Quaranta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281539 | Kalkanoglu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8302358 | Kalkanoglu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316608 | Binkley et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323440 | Koch et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8371072 | Shanes et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8371085 | Koch | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8453408 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
D695925 | Ray | Dec 2013 | S |
D711558 | Bobolts | Aug 2014 | S |
D735545 | Rampling | Aug 2015 | S |
20010000372 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010049002 | Mccumber et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000068 | Freiborg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038531 | Freshwater et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078651 | Freshwater et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020114913 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030040241 | Kiik et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030070579 | Hong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093958 | Freiborg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093963 | Stahl et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030124292 | Unterreiter | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138601 | Elliott | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030196389 | Naipawer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040055240 | Kiik et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055241 | Railkar | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079042 | Elliott | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083672 | Penner | May 2004 | A1 |
20040083673 | Kalkanoglu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040083674 | Kalkanoglu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109971 | Weinstein et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111996 | Heronome | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123537 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040123543 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148874 | Jolitz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172908 | Swann | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206012 | Pressutti | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206035 | Kandalgaonkar | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040258883 | Weaver | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005555 | Naipawar | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050137295 | Kendrick et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050193673 | Rodrigues et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204675 | Snyder et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210808 | Larson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235599 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252136 | Hardin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060032174 | Floyd | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060175386 | Holley, Jr. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179767 | Miller et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201094 | Lassiter | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060265990 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020436 | Teng et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070039274 | Harrington et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042158 | Belt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070107372 | Harrington, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070144077 | Quaranta et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070179220 | Sasagawa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070266665 | Todd et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080134612 | Koschitzky | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090038257 | Todd et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090139175 | Todd et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090282767 | Grubka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100077689 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100143667 | Collins et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192496 | Koch et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100192500 | Koch et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100192501 | Koch | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212240 | Grubka | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212246 | Grubka | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218433 | Quaranta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100239807 | Grubka | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100310825 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313512 | Rodrigues et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005158 | Kailey et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110126485 | Bleil et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151170 | Grubka et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110209428 | Elliott | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214378 | Grubka | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110319533 | Gauthier et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130177728 | Grubka et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1207975 | Jul 1986 | CA |
2176391 | Sep 1994 | CN |
50-002937 | Jan 1975 | JP |
WO 2005100479 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2007108846 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008052029 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009016281 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010098972 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011100217 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/997,657, filed Nov. 5, 2008. |
Response to the Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/997,657, filed Nov. 5, 2008. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Jan. 19, 2012. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated May 30, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Oct. 3, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,130 dated Feb. 29, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,130 dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,130 dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,028 dated Aug. 10, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,028 dated Jun. 21, 2012. |
Office action from Chinese application No. 200680028893.4 dated Apr. 24, 2009. |
Office action from Japanese Application No. 2008-525265 dated Dec. 12, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/019,028 dated Dec. 19, 2012. |
International Search Report from PCT/US06/30633 dated Nov. 28, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US07/07827 dated Aug. 29, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US10/23541 dated Jul. 6, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US11/023989 dated May 26, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Mar. 15, 2001. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Oct. 11, 2001. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Jan. 2, 2002. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Jun. 7, 2002. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Sep. 16, 2004. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Feb. 22, 2005. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Dec. 2, 2005. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Apr. 25, 2006. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Oct. 11, 2006. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Apr. 20, 2007. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Jul. 19, 2007. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Sep. 19, 2007. |
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Feb. 8, 2008. |
Examiner's Answer from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Jun. 18, 2008. |
Decision on Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Jul. 28, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,928 dated Sep. 27, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/119,937 dated Apr. 14, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/119,937 dated Nov. 4, 2010. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/119,937 dated Jan. 19, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/119,937 dated Apr. 3, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Mar. 4, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Sep. 13, 2010. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Dec. 14, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Dec. 22, 2010. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Aug. 18, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Nov. 21, 2011. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Feb. 27, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/392,392 dated Jul. 19, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated Jun. 18, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated Jul. 20, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,519 dated Oct. 3, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,519 dated May 1, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated May 25, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Aug. 30, 2011. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Dec. 28, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Aug. 16, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Serial No, 13/193,864 dated Nov. 04, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457, filed Nov. 21, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated Dec. 3, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Sep. 24, 2014. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,457 dated Aug. 27, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,726 dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Jul. 30, 2014. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,736 dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,726 dated Jan. 22, 2015. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Jan. 26, 2015. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,519 dated Dec. 12, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,726 dated Feb. 5, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Jan. 10, 2014. |
Haynes, Shellflex 3681 MSDS, Jan. 4, 1999, 5 pgs. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated Feb. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,519 dated Apr. 2, 2015. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated May 7, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,864 dated May 15, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/717,519 dated Jun. 12, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,459 dated Jul. 11, 2013. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Jun. 6, 2014. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated Mar. 4, 2015. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,459 dated Dec. 13, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Nov. 6, 2015. |
Supplemental Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated Nov. 23, 2015. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 29/483,307 dated Sep. 15, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,457 dated May 26, 2015. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,025 dated May 21, 2015. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,697,223 dated Jan. 12, 2016. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,697,221 dated Feb. 2, 2016. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,753,250 dated Nov. 26, 2015 received in our office on Feb. 11, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 29/483,307 dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,334 dated Apr. 8, 2016. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,697,223 dated Aug. 25, 2016. |
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,753,250 dated Aug. 19, 2016. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,957 dated Dec. 15, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100236178 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61161996 | Mar 2009 | US | |
61162111 | Mar 2009 | US |