This application is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/422,820, which is a divisional reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/305,813, filed Dec. 19, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 41,169, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 6,779,575, issued on Aug. 24, 2004, which was a national stage application of PCT/SE99/00878, filed May 25, 1999, which claims priority to SE-9801885, filed May 28, 1998, the disclosures of which are herewith incorporated by reference in their entirety.
More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,779,575. The reissue applications are application Ser. No. 11/305,813, filed Dec. 19, 2005 (the original reissue application); application Ser. No. 12/422,820, filed Apr. 13, 2009, which is a divisional reissue of Ser. No. 11/305,813; application Ser. No. 12/422,835 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,754), filed Apr. 13, 2009, which is a divisional reissue of application Ser. No. 11/305,813; application Ser. No. 13/092,522, filed Apr. 22, 2011 (abandoned); application Ser. No. 13/536,199, filed Jun. 28, 2012, which is a continuation reissue of application Ser. No. 12/422,820; application Ser. No. 13/613,669 (the present application), filed Sep. 13, 2012, which is a continuation reissue of application Ser. No. 12/422,820; and application Ser. No. 13/613,658, filed Sep. 13, 2012, which is a continuation reissue of application Ser. No. 12/422,820.
The present invention relates to an appliance for mechanical sealing of hollow hoses of elastic material with a sealing means which is made of plastically deformable material and which is applied to the hose, said appliance having two jaws, which are movable towards and away from each other and which, when moving towards each other, crimp the sealing means against the hose to seal the same.
In a prior-art sealing appliance of the type mentioned by way of introduction, the sealing means in the form of a folded clip is applied to a likewise folded end of the hose. The clip is then crimped against the hose to seal the same, after which the hose is cut downstream of the clip by means of a pair of scissors or some other cutting tool.
As the relevant hoses have a relatively small diameter, say 5-10 mm, the clips are also relatively small and often difficult to apply in the right position on the folded end of the hose. Nor is it infrequent that the clip falls off the end of the hose, before the sealing appliance has managed to grip it for crimping against the hose with the ensuing risk of sealing not taking place.
The sealing appliance according to the invention is primarily to be used in the type of device which is intended for introduction and/or withdrawal of a medium in a container and which is disclosed and described in WO 97/16715. More specifically, it is intended for contamination-free sealing and cutting of the hoses which extend between the conveying means and the collecting vessels which are connected to the process container, so that the collecting vessels after being filled with a medium from the process container can be moved without any risk of contamination to a laboratory or the like for sampling or analysis of the medium.
In the above use of the sealing appliance, which requires good hygienic conditions and contamination-free environment/surroundings, clips of the mentioned type are unacceptable. One reason for this is that they are difficult to handle and often do not provide the desired sealing. Another reason is that there is in most cases at least a small portion of the hose left downstream of the clip containing a small quantity of the medium which leaks out to the surrounding area with an obvious risk of contamination.
The main object of the present invention is to provide a sealing appliance of the type mentioned by way of introduction, satisfying all the requirements for contamination-free transport of the relevant collecting vessels, which are filled with a medium, to the laboratory or the like.
This as well as related objects are achieved in a simple and efficient manner in that the sealing means has the form of a sleeve which is slipped on to the hose, that at least one of the jaws has at least one bar which projects towards the other jaw and which, when the jaws are moving towards each other, makes an indentation in the sleeve and the hose to reinforce the sealing thereof as well as the fixing of the sleeve on the hose, and that at least one of the jaws has a cutting means, which projects towards the other jaw and which, when the jaws are moving towards each other, makes a cutting indication in the sleeve and the hose to allow a sealing cutting of the hose.
In a particularly preferred embodiment there are at least two straight bars which are arranged substantially in parallel at a distance from each other and extend substantially transversely of the longitudinal direction of the sleeve to make a corresponding number of substantially transverse indentations in the sleeve and the hose, the cutting means preferably extending substantially transversely of the longitudinal direction of the sleeve and making a substantially transverse cutting indication in the sleeve and the hose.
The invention will be described below in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
As mentioned above, the appliance generally designated 1 is primarily conceived for use in the type of device which is intended for introduction and/or withdrawal of a medium in a container and which is disclosed and described in WO 97/16715. More specifically, it is intended for sealing and cutting the hoses in a mechanical and contamination-free manner, which extend between the conveying means and the collecting vessels which are connected to the process container, so that the collecting vessels after being filled with a medium from the process container can be transported without any risk of contamination to a laboratory or the like for sampling or analysis of the medium.
Still, the appliance 1 can, of course, also be used in a number of other applications where good hygienic conditions and/or contamination-free surroundings and/or working environment are required to a varying extent.
Thus the appliance 1 is generally intended for mechanical sealing of hollow hoses 2 of elastic material, e.g. rubber or plastic, of a quality which is suitable for the purpose. The sealing is carried out with the aid of a sealing means 3, which is made of a plastically deformable material, e.g. plastic or metal, having suitable plastic properties and which is applied to the hose 2. In the preferred embodiment shown, the sealing means 3 consists of a metal sleeve 4 which has been slipped on to the hose 2 in advance. The sleeve has a length of preferably two or more multiples of the diameter of the hose 2, which in turn is typically in the range of 5-10 mm.
As shown in
More specifically, as best seen in
Moreover, at least one of the jaws 8 or 9, also in this case the jaw 8, has a cutting means 13 projecting towards the other jaw 9 or 8 (see
In the shown embodiment, the cutting means 13 is preferably formed as a substantially straight cutting edge 15. The cutting edge extends substantially transversely of the longitudinal direction of the sleeve 4 and thus makes a substantially transverse cutting indication 14 in the sleeve 4 and in the hose 2. As seen in
Preferably, the cutting edge 15 is situated substantially halfway between the bars 11, if they are two in number, such as shown in
The cutting indication 14 mentioned above is preferably such that the sleeve 4 and the hose 2 are not cut or broken directly when sealing by means of the appliance 1, such as shown in
Naturally, nothing prevents the sleeve 4 and the hose 2 from being separated along the cutting indication 14 directly in connection with the actual sealing.
To fix the sleeve 4 and the hose 2 in the intended position between the jaws 8 and 9 in the appliance 1 when sealing, at least one of the jaws 8 or 9, in this case the jaw 9, has a fixture 17. The fixture fixes and supports the hose 2 and the sleeve 4 laterally, horizontally and vertically and can be formed in an optional manner which is not described in further detail.
For practical and other reasons, in the disclosed and described embodiment the bars 11 and the cutting edge 15 are arranged on one of the jaws 8 or 9, in this case the jaw 8, and the fixture 17 on the other, opposite jaw 9 or 8, in this case the jaw 9. The bars 11, the cutting edge 15 and the fixture 17 can be mounted on the associated jaw 8, 9 with the aid of suitable attachment means, which are not shown. Alternatively, one/some of or all these components can be made in one piece with the associated jaw. In the shown case, the bars 11 and the cutting edge 15 are made in one piece with the associated jaw, whereas the fixture 17 is mounted on the associated jaw, see
In the preferred embodiment, the jaw 8 provided with the bars 11 and the cutting edge 15 suitably has the form of a die is which is fixedly mounted in the appliance 1 with the aid of attachment means (not shown), see
The invention is not, of course, limited to the embodiment which is described above and shown in the drawings, and can be modified in many different ways within the scope of protection according to the appended claims.
The appliance 1 does not, for example, need to be a manually operable pair of tongs, but it can alternatively be a separate tool or a tool which is included in a machine and driven electrically, pneumatically, hydraulically etc according to need and desire. The jaws 8, 9 with the associated components (bars 11, cutting edge 15 and fixture 17) can be attached to the appliance 1 in a replaceable manner and match the size of the hose 2 and the sleeve 4 and/or be mutually exchangeable etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9801885 | May 1998 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE99/00878 | 5/25/1999 | WO | 00 | 12/4/2000 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO99/64837 | 12/15/1999 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2776473 | Dailey et al. | Jan 1957 | A |
3175556 | Wood et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3263465 | Way et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3276447 | Hamilton | Oct 1966 | A |
3523351 | Filia | Aug 1970 | A |
3576122 | Churla | Apr 1971 | A |
3931671 | Dittmann | Jan 1976 | A |
4026294 | Mattler | May 1977 | A |
4428374 | Auburn | Jan 1984 | A |
4608178 | Johansson et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4625494 | Iwatschenko et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637242 | Undin et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
5105648 | Steiner et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5131213 | Shanklin et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5236331 | Liu | Aug 1993 | A |
5300060 | Nelson | Apr 1994 | A |
5509291 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520218 | Hlavinka et al. | May 1996 | A |
5584840 | Ramsey et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5649444 | Nilsson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5711078 | Patton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5732530 | Pfaff | Mar 1998 | A |
5768935 | Owens | Jun 1998 | A |
5775158 | Hensley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5968054 | Yeatts, II et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6230781 | Smith | May 2001 | B1 |
6779575 | Arthun | Aug 2004 | B1 |
RE41169 | Arthun | Mar 2010 | E |
7959754 | Arthun | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20080149503 | Pandori | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20110197426 | Arthun | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0508474 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0508474 | Oct 1992 | EP |
9716715 | May 1997 | WO |
9716715 | May 1997 | WO |
9964837 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,820. |
Case 2:05-cv-05175-DMC-MF, Document 35, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Filed Jun. 3, 2010; 37-Pages; “Gore's Memorandum in Opposition to Millipore's Motion to Reopen The Action and for Contempt and Millipore's Motion to Substitute”. |
Case 2:05-cv-05175-DMC-MF, Document 23-1, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Filed May 12, 2010; 22-Pages; “Memorandum in Support of Motion to Reopen the Action for the Limited Purpose of Enforcing the Consent Judgment Order and for Contempt Against W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.” |
Case 2:05-cv-05175-DMC-MF, Document 43, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Filed Jun. 14, 2010; 23-Pages; “Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion to Reopen the Action for the Limited Purpose of Enforcing the Consent Judgment Order and for Contempt Against W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.” |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Gore's Invalidity Contentions, dated May 25, 2012, 20 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Gore's Invalidity Contentions, dated May 25, 2012, Exhibit A, 35 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Gore's Invalidity Contentions, dated May 25, 2012, Exhibit B, 38 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Gore's Invalidity Contentions, dated May 25, 2012, Exhibit C, 33 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Gore's Invalidity Contentions, dated May 25, 2012, Exhibit D, 37 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2010 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,820. |
Final Rejection dated Nov. 16, 2010 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,820. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 10, 2011 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,820. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 11, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,820. |
Final Rejection mailed Apr. 16, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,820. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/613,658. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 131536,199. |
International Search Report mailed Sep. 7, 1999 in PCT application No. PCT/SE99/00878. |
International Preliminary Exam Report mailed Sep. 26, 2000 in PCT application No. PCT/SE99/00878. |
Civil Action No. 2:05-05175 (DMC/MF), USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Consent Judgment Order”, Document 22, Filed Feb. 28, 2007, 5 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:05-05175 (DMC/MF), USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Opinion” (granting substitution of parties, denying motion for contempt), Document 50, Filed Dec. 29, 2010, 13 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:05-05175 (DMC/MF), USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C”, Exhibits referenced in Document 50, Filed Dec. 29, 2010, 3 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Memorandum of Law in Support of Application for Preliminary Injunction”, Document 4-1, Filed Mar. 15, 2011, 26 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Gore's Opposition to Millipore's Application For Preliminary Injunction”, Document 20, Filed Apr. 15, 2011, 37 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Expert Report of James Dean Vogel”, Document 20-9, Filed Apr. 15, 2011, 14 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Millipore's Reply to Gore's Opposition to Application for Preliminary Injunction”, Document 21, Filed Apr. 27, 2011, 17 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Supplemental Declaration of Samir Nayfeh”, Document 21-1, Filed Apr. 27, 2011, 17 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Opinion” (denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction), Document 33, Filed Nov. 9, 2011, 26 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-DMC-JAD, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions”, Filed Jun. 30, 2011, 40 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Gore's Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Millipore's Infringement Contentions”, Filed Aug. 15, 2011, 26 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Gore's Response Claim Construction Brief”, Document 42, Filed Feb. 8, 2012, 32 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Millipore's Responding Markman Brief”, Document 43, Filed Feb. 8, 2012, 29 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, Relevant pages of W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.'s Answers to Millipore's Second Set of Interrogatories (Interrogatory Nos. 10-12), Served Jul. 2, 2012, 7 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Opinion” (on claim construction), Document 82, Dated Oct. 24, 2012, 22 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, Relevant page of “Pull-off test post cut, half inch and three quarter-tubing size Test protocol”, bearing Bates No. MNJ0296286, Oct. 31, 2006, 1 page. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, Relevant page of “Use-life integrity test post cut Novaseal quarter and half inch tubing size Test protocol”, bearing Bates No. MNJ0311874, Jan. 25, 2007, 1 page. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-CLW, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Statement of Use under 37 CFR 2.88 with Declaration” from US Trademark application 75/066,270, executed Jan. 27, 1998, bearing Bates Nos. WLG-NJ00053431-32, 2 pages. |
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-01453-ES-SCM, USDC for the District of New Jersey, “Stipulated Order of Dismissal With Prejudice”, Document 86, Issued Jun. 10, 2013 and Filed Jun. 13, 2013, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09701459 | May 1999 | US |
Child | 13613669 | US |