SEALING COMPOSITION FOR REPAIRING TYRES

Abstract
Sealing composition for repairing tyres comprising: from 5% to 15% of natural latex; from 20% to 60% synthetic latex; from 30% to 60% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol; from 0.05% to 5% of silica; the synthetic latex comprising from 15% to 40% of ethylene-vinyl acetate, the percentages being by weight of the total composition.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a sealing composition for repairing tyres.


BACKGROUND ART

When a tyre is punctured, it is now common practice to use a sealing composition. Said composition is poured into the tyre to repair the puncture from the inside, thus ensuring an air-tight seal of the tyre.


Different sealing compositions are known in which a rubber latex, generally natural rubber, is mixed with an adhesive and an anti-freeze agent.


The drawback, however, is that said compositions, if kept for long periods, are subject to phenomena of aggregation between the latex particles and the adhesive particles resulting in the composition taking on a creamy look. Generally, therefore, when said creamy composition is dispensed, it obstructs the dispenser valve and is not able to adequately repair the puncture.


Studies carried out by the inventors have shown that one of the causes of obstruction of the dispenser valve appears to be the large dimension of the natural rubber particles of approximately 1 micron and their non-uniform and unstable granulometric distribution.


Compositions are also known which do not contain an adhesive agent. However, also said compositions cause obstruction of the dispenser valve.


EP2655504 discloses a sealing composition comprising natural latex, synthetic latex, preferably SBR latex, an antifreezing agent, preferably propylene glycol or ethylene glycol and a mineral selected from the group consisting of phyllosilicates and silica.


This composition does not result in clogging of the dispenser valve.


However, the need is felt in the art for a new sealing composition for repairing tyres which is without the drawbacks of the known compositions, presenting increased performances in terms of shelf-life and sealing properties.


DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

The object of the present invention is therefore to find a sealing composition which is stable in the long term with rubber latex particles which are not subject to phenomena of aggregation resulting in obstruction of the dispenser valve, but at the same time with increased sealing capacity and shelf-life.


Said object is achieved by the sealing composition as claimed in claim 1.


In particular, according to an aspect of the invention, it is provided a sealing composition for repairing tyres comprising:

    • from 5% to 15% of natural latex;
    • from 20% to 60% synthetic latex;
    • from 30% to 60% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol;
    • from 0.05% to 5% of silica;


wherein said synthetic latex comprises from 15% to 40% of ethylene-vinyl acetate,


the percentages being by weight of the total composition.


More particularly, the composition comprises:

    • from 5% to 10% of natural latex;
    • from 20% to 50% synthetic latex;
    • from 40% to 50% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol;
    • from 0.05% to 4% of silica;


wherein the synthetic latex comprises from 20% to 30% of ethylene-vinyl acetate,


the percentages being by weight of the total composition.


It has been observed that the presence of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) as part of the synthetic latex increases the sealing performances of the composition. Moreover, it has been observed an increase in the shelf life of the composition.


Advantageously the introduction of EVA allows a reduction in the content of natural latex with a reduction of ammonia odour of the sealing composition.


Preferably the synthetic latex further comprises a latex selected from the group consisting of a styrene-butadiene and carboxylated styrene-butadiene latex, more preferably, a styrene-butadiene latex.


The composition of the invention may contain silica with a BET surface area in the range between 170 and 250 m2/cm3, preferably between 175 and 225 m2/cm3.


The presence of silica performs an adjuvant action during sealing of the puncture as it penetrates into the latex mixture during polymerisation, performing a mechanical reinforcement action.


Preferably the glycol is propylene glycol.


Lastly the sealing composition can also comprise additives such as an anti-oxidant agent, preferably in an amount of 0.05-3%, more preferably 0.1-2.5%, and a stabiliser agent preferably in an amount of 0.2-3, more preferably 0.3-2%.


Further characteristics of the present invention will become clear from the following description of some merely illustrative and non-limiting examples.







BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Example 1

Chemical-Physical Characterisation of a Sealing Composition of the Invention


The composition illustrated in Table 1 was produced according to the invention.












TABLE 1








Quantity



Components
(kg ± 0.5%)



















Natural latex
80



Sodium-n-alkyl-
15



benzene sulphonate



(stabilizer)



Polymeric
10



hindered phenol



(Antioxidant)



Propylene Glycol
390



SBR
100



Silica
4



EVA latex
211



Deionized water
190










The viscosity, the pH and the specific gravity (SpG) were evaluated on the composition illustrated in Table 1. The results are given in Table 2.












TABLE 2









Physical properties













Viscosity
Viscosity

Specific


Batch
(Cps)
(Cps)

gravity


number
25° C.
−40° C.
pH
(SpG, 25° C.)





1
34.2
5090
6.75
1.0439









Example 2

Test for Evaluation of Sealing Properties


The sealing power of the composition was evaluated by Ford specification (ES8S43-19L523-AA) in which a puncture was made between the grooves with a 6 mm diameter steel nail.


The reduction of the tyre pressure after 30 seconds, measured to determine a linear deflation speed in kPa/min, was about 50 kPa.


Subsequently the tyre was fitted on a test car and connected to a compressor. The sealing composition of example 1 was injected into the tyre which was then inflated to 250 kPa.


The test car was driven for 10 minutes at a minimum speed of 30 km/h and maximum speed of 80 km/h, measuring the tyre pressure to evaluate the sealing power according to the pressure loss after 10 minutes and verifying any leaks from the puncture made.


Subsequently the test car was stopped and the pressure was measured again after 1 hour and 2 hours.


The results obtained are given in Table 3.


As can be seen, the sealing composition proved capable of sealing the tyre not only at ambient temperature but also at 70° C. and at −40° C.
















TABLE 3








P drop









after
Injection


















30 s
of sealing
Tyre inflation
Run test
Run test















P0 =
composition

P

tire 3 min
tire 5 min




















250

MaxP
MinP
final

ΔP
Final
Suds
ΔP
Final P
Suds


Batch
(kPa)
t (s)
(kPa)
(kPa)
(Psi)
t
kPa
P kPa
Test
kPa
kPa
Test










Sealing composition kept at ambient temperature



















1
210
31″
469
98
38(36)
4′41″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK


1
205
31″
476
105
38(36)
4′32″
28
222
OK
0
222
OK


1
210
34″
504
112
38(36)
4′22″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK


1
210
33″
560
119
38(36)
3′47″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK


1
210
27″
546
119
39(36)
4′24″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK


1
200
25″
483
119
39(36)
4′01″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK
























Run test
Stop test
Stop test








tire 10 min
tire 1
tire 2

























ΔP
Final
Suds
ΔP
P
ΔP
P







Batch
kPa
P kPa
Test
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa






















Sealing composition kept at ambient temperature
























1
21
229
OK
7
222
0
222







1
28
222
OK
7
215
0
215







1
21
229
OK
7
222
0
222







1
21
229
OK
7
222
0
222







1
14
236
OK
7
229
0
229







1
21
229
OK
7
222
0
222






P drop






























after
Injection






















30 s
of sealing
Tyre inflation
Run test
Run test















P0 =
composition

P

tire 3 min
tire 5 min




















250

Max P
MinP
final

ΔP
Fin
Suds
ΔP
Fin P
Suds


Batch
(kPa)
t (s)
(kPa)
(kPa)
(Psi)
t
kPa
P kPa
Test
kPa
kPa
Test










Sealing composition kept at 70° C. for 2 hrs



















1
205
29″
420
91
38(36)
4′53″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK


1
210
28″
434
91
38(36)
4′18″
28
222
OK
0
222
OK


1
210
27″
504
119
39(36)
4′31″
28
222
OK
0
222
OK


1
210
26″
490
98
38(36)
3′53″
42
208
OK
0
208
OK


1
205
24″
504
112
38(36)
4′26″
21
229
OK
0
229
OK


1
210
26″
504
112
38(36)
3′47″
42
208
OK
7
201
OK







Sealing composition kept at −40° C. for 2 hrs



















1
140
5′24″
595
126
/
/
/
/
X3
56
194
X1


1
190
5′02″
7006
126
/
/
/
/
X3
14
236
OK


1
170
4′42″
6363
119
/
/
/
/
X3
14
236
X3


1
150
5′26″
630
140
/
/
/
/
X3
14
236
X1


1
160
3′55″
700
140
/
/
/
/
X3
14
236
X1


1
180
4′55″
630
140
/
/
14
236
X2
0
236
OK
























Run test
Stop test
Stop test








tire 10 min
tire 1 h
tire 2 h later

























ΔP
Final
Suds
ΔP

ΔP
P







Batch
kPa
P kPa
Test
kPa
P kPa
kPa
kPa






















Sealing composition kept at 70° C. for 2 hrs
























1
0
229
OK
7
222
0
222







1
0
222
OK
7
215
0
215







1
0
222
OK
7
215
0
215







1
7
194
OK
7
187
0
187







1
−7
236
OK
7
229
0
229







1
0
194
OK
7
187
0
187



















Sealing composition kept at −40° C. for 2 hrs
























1
0
201
OK
7
194
0
194







1
0
243
OK
7
236
0
236







1
0
243
OK
7
236
0
236







1
−7
250
OK
7
243
0
243







1
0
236
OK
7
229
0
229







1
0
243
OK
7
236
0
236



















Injection








Pressure drop
of

















after 30 s
sealing
Tyre inflation
Run test tire














P0 =
composition

P

10 min
















250

MaxP
MinP
final
t min
ΔP
Final P.


Batch
(kPa)
t (s)
(kPa)
(kPa)
(Psi)
(s)
kPa
P kPa










Sealing composition kept at 80° C. for 100 hours















1
205
27″
420
98
38(36)
4′41″
35
215


1
205
31″
406
105
38(36)
4′16″
35
215


1
205
28″
385
98
38(36)
4′37″
21
229







Sealing composition kept at −40° C. for 120 hours















1
160
6′57″
700
133
/
/
−7
257


1
170
3′59″
700
126
/
/
14
236


1
160
5′37″
630
140
/
/
28
222





















Stop test
Stop test







tire 1 h later
tire 2 h later




















ΔP

ΔP







Batch
kPa
P kPa
kPa
P kPa




















Sealing composition kept at 80° C. for 100 hrs



















1
7
208
0
208






1
7
208
0
208






1
7
222
0
222

















Sealing composition kept at −40° C. for 120 hours



















1
7
250
0
250






1
7
229
0
229






1
7
215
0
215









From low temperature of −40° C. to high temperature of 70° C., even at extreme condition of 80° C./100 hrs and −40° C./120 hrs, sealant is dispersed freely without any valve clog, and the test tires are sealed completely within 10 min. After 1 hr and 2 hrs storage, tire pressure is kept, and sealing performance is perfect.


Example 3

Test for Evaluation of Sealing Properties after Aging


The sealing properties of the composition of example 1 (TEK9) have been evaluated after aging (45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 105 days) and compared to those of a composition prepared according to EP2655504 (TEK8). In particular, TEK8 composition has the following composition:

    • 29.5% Natural Latex
    • 31% of SBR
    • 36.6% Propylene glycol
    • 0.6% silica


The test has been performed aging the sealing composition for the required days into an oven at 70° C. Thereafter, the test described in example 2 has been performed.


The results are illustrated in table 4.


















TABLE 4










Injection of




Stop test
Stop test



















P drop
sealing

Run test
Run test
Run test
Run test tire
tire 1 h
tire 2 h




after 30 s
composition
Tyre inflation
tire 3 min
tire 5 min
tire 7 min
10 min
later
later


























Aging
P0 = 250

MaxP
MinP
P final

ΔP
Suds
ΔP
Suds
ΔP
Suds
ΔP
Final
Suds
ΔP
ΔP


Batch
time
(kPa)
t (s)
kPa
kPa
Psi
t (s)
kPa
Test
kPa
Test
kPa
Test
kPa
P kPa
Test
kPa
kPa





TEK9
45
215
35″
574
126
38(36)
4′07″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
45
210
33″
532
126
40(36)
4′06″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
55
215
28″
546
112
38(36)
3′41″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
55
210
35″
560
126
38(36)
3′37″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
65
205
32″
469
105
39(36)
3′55″
28
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
222
OK
0
7


TEK9
65
205
32″
476
119
38(36)
4′29″
21
OK
−7
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
75
205
31″
532
112
38(36)
4′09″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
75
195
33″
511
112
39(36)
4′24″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
75
205
32″
455
105
38(36)
4′21″
28
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
222
OK
7
0


TEK9
75
205
30″
504
119
39(36)
3′57″
14
OK
−7
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
75
210
33″
574
119
39(36)
4′09″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0






























Injection of












Stop test
Stop test





















P drop
sealing



Run test
Run test
Run test
Run test tire
tire 1 h
tire 2 h



















after 30 s
composition
Tyre inflation
tire 3 min
tire 5 min
tire 7 min
10 min
later
later


























Aging
P0 = 250

MaxP
MinP
Pfinal

ΔP
Suds
ΔP
Suds
ΔP
Suds
ΔP
Final
Suds
ΔP
ΔP


Batch
time
(kPa)
t (s)
kPa
kPa
Psi
t
kPa
Test
kPa
Test
kPa
Test
kPa
P kPa
Test
kPa
kPa





TEK9
85
210
27″
546
126
39(36)
3′53″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
85
205
30″
567
126
38(36)
3′39″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
−7
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
85
200
26″
560
105
39(36)
5′11″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
−7
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
85
210
29″
532
126
39(36)
3′34″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
85
205
29″
490
112
38(36)
4′01″
0
OK
0
OK
−7
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
95
205
33″
511
126
38(36)
3′41″
21
OK
−7
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
95
205
31″
539
119
38(36)
4′06″
21
OK
−7
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
95
205
30″
574
119
38(36)
3′50″
0
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
95
205
28″
518
112
39(36)
3′45″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
95
200
29″
518
105
38(36)
4′24″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
105
205
31″
518
112
38(36)
3′41″
14
OK
−7
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
105
200
30″
532
105
38(36)
4′07″
28
OK
−7
OK
0
OK
−7
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
105
205
31″
546
119
38(36)
4′19″
21
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
229
OK
7
0


TEK9
105
210
30″
511
105
38(36)
4′08″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK9
105
205
30″
504
112
39(36)
3′57″
21
X1
−7
OK
0
OK
0
236
OK
7
0


TEK8
45
200
31″
496
110
37(35)
5′26″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
227
OK
7
7


TEK8
45
200
32″
523
96
37(35)
6′24″
28
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
213
OK
7
0


TEK8
45
200
30″
592
96
37(35)
5′36″
28
X
21
x
0
OK
0
192
OK
14
0


TEK8
55
200
25″
440
82
37(35)
6′24″
34
X
14
OK
0
OK
0
213
OK
7
7


TEK8
55
200
32″
454
110
37(35)
6′30″
14
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
234
OK
14
7


TEK8
55
200
24″
510
110
37(35)
6′44″
14
X
7
OK
0
OK
0
220
OK
7
7


TEK8
65
200
29″
510
82
37(35)
6′19″
7
OK
0
OK
−7
OK
0
241
OK
7
7


TEK8
65
200
22″
585
96
255(241)
6′16″
7
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
241
OK
7
7


TEK8
75
200
29″
510
96
261(241)
5′56″
21
OK
0
OK
−7
OK
0
234
OK
7
7


TEK8
75
200
26″
496
96
255(241)
6′04″
7
OK
0
OK
0
OK
0
234
OK
7
7


TEK8
75
200
24″
523
96
255(241)
6′24″
14
X
7
OK
7
OK
0
213
OK
7
7









As evident from the data in Table 4, TEK9 performs better after aging than the sealing composition of the prior art (TEK8). In particular, the composition of the invention is more stable after aging, sealing the tyre at least 2 minutes before the composition of the prior art.


Moreover, the experimental data demonstrates that the aging affects also the viscosity of the composition of the prior art (see table 5).












TABLE 5









Physical properties













Viscosity
Status after blended


Aging days
Batch
(Cps) 20-100
for 1 min













0
TEK8
61.7
No coagulation


15
TEK8
72.8
No coagulation


25
TEK8
42.4
No coagulation


35
TEK8
58.7
No coagulation


45
TEK8
42.2
No coagulation


55
TEK8
45.8
No coagulation


65
TEK8
47.5
No coagulation


75
TEK8
36.1
No coagulation


0
TEK9
34.2
No coagulation


15
TEK9
35.7
No coagulation


25
TEK9
57.2
No coagulation


35
TEK9
77.6
No coagulation


45
TEK9
92.6
No coagulation


55
TEK9
97
No coagulation


65
TEK9
77.1
No coagulation


75
TEK9
89.5
No coagulation


85
TEK9
84.8
No coagulation


95
TEK9
78.1
No coagulation


105
TEK9
74.8
No coagulation









Viscosity of aged sealant increases initially, and then the viscosity decreases. In the ageing process of TEK8, viscosity at 75 days (36.1 cps) decreased about 41% than the initial (36.1 cps). On the contrary, for the TEK9 aged sealant, viscosity still keeps sticky with 74.8 Cps after 105 days ageing.

Claims
  • 1. A sealing composition for repairing tyres comprising: from 5% to 15% of natural latex;from 20% to 60% synthetic latex;from 30% to 60% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol;from 0.05% to 5% of silica;characterized in that said synthetic latex comprises from 15% to 40% of ethylene-vinyl acetate,the percentages being by weight of the total composition.
  • 2. The composition according to claim 1, characterized in that it comprises: from 5% to 10% of natural latex;from 20% to 50% synthetic latex;from 40% to 50% of a glycol selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol;from 0.05% to 4% of silica;characterized in that said synthetic latex comprises from 20% to 30% of ethylene-vinyl acetate,the percentages being by weight of the total composition.
  • 3. The composition according to claim 1, characterized in that said silica has a BET surface area in the range between 170 and 250 m2/cm3.
  • 4. The sealing composition according to claim 1, characterised in that said synthetic latex further comprises a latex selected from the group consisting of a styrene-butadiene and carboxylated styrene-butadiene latex.
  • 5. The sealing composition according to claim 4, characterised in that said synthetic latex is a styrene-butadiene latex.
  • 6. The sealing composition according to claim 1, characterised in that said glycol is propylene glycol.
  • 7. The sealing composition according to claim 1, characterised in that it further comprises an anti-oxidant agent and a stabilising agent.
  • 8. The sealing composition according to claim 7, characterised by comprising 0.05-3% of said antioxidant agent and 0.2-3% of said stabilising agent.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
102016000062895 Jun 2016 IT national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2017/064852 6/16/2017 WO 00