This is a non-provisional application based upon U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/556,526 entitled “SEALING DETECTION”, filed Sep. 11, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to seal detection, in particular, to a system and method for determining relevant characteristics of a seal.
Seal detection devices are used to determine when a seal should be repaired or replaced. Current seal detection devices lack the ability to provide an analysis of a sealing surface against a known reference or in the alternative against an earlier provide image of the current sealing surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,166,891 to Borowski et al. disclose concentric circular chevrons on a sealing surface to provide visual detection of proper installation. U.S. Pat. No. 7,477,374 to Schmidt et al. disclose a method and device for examining a sealing surface wherein an optical deflector is used to scatter light across a sealing surface. U.S. Pat. No. 7,405,818 to Heinzen discloses a self-monitoring static seal that utilizes an optical sensor and wear indicator on a sealing surface. U.S. Pat. No. 9,168,696 to Farrell and U.S. Pat. No. 9,662,833 to Farrell et al. disclose using lasers to change the optical properties of the seal surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,013 to Stewart et al. disclose a radio-frequency identification (RFID) chip that has been embedded into an o-ring or other fluid seal during manufacture of the o-ring or fluid seal. The embedded RFID chip may be used as a passive tag or onboard chip which may function as a radio receiver or transmitter as well as store electronic data. A disadvantage of Stewart et al. is the addition of an additional component, the RFID chip, to the o-ring or fluid seal and the requirement of embedding the RFID chip during the manufacturing phase.
What is needed in the art is an inexpensive solution to track seal surface condition and provide guidance on repair and/or replacement needs.
In one exemplary embodiment formed in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a seal detection device. The seal detection device includes at least one seal with an outer surface where the outer surface is partially made up of a lateral surface and an axial surface. The at least one seal is provided with at least one seal mark and is placed on the lateral surface or the axial surface of the at least one seal. The at least one seal may be further provided with a unique code and may be associated with relevant seal data such as seal material, date of installation, last maintenance date, next scheduled maintenance/replacement, material safety data sheet(s), etc.
In another exemplary embodiment formed in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a seal detection system. A sealing detection system includes at least one seal with at least one seal sealing surface and an outer surface including an edge region surface and an axially facing surface, at least one seal mark located on the outer surface of the at least one seal configured for a readable state in an installed or an uninstalled condition where the at least one seal mark is associated with an at least one relevant seal information characteristic of the at least one seal, at least one sealed element including a contact surface in communication with the at least one sealing surface of the at least one seal, the at least one seal mark associated with the at least one sealed element; and a device configured to store the at least one relevant seal information characteristic.
In another exemplary embodiment formed in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method directed to tracking sealing performance between a seal and a sealed element. The method includes the steps of providing a seal configured for a sealed element, marking the seal with a seal mark, identifying the seal by a unique code, marking the sealed element with a sealed element mark, identifying the element by a unique code, performing a visual check of the seal's sealing surface to determine if the seal is acceptable, performing a visual check of the sealed surface to determine if the sealed surface is acceptable, and optionally identifying the torqueing of a connection between a sealed element and a seal to produce a torque curve data indicating compression of the seal.
One example of codes that can be placed on the seal and seal element are unique QR codes placed as a sticker or otherwise. Other possibilities are augmented reality concepts or a measuring plate which sandwiches the seal between the measuring plate and sealed surface, with information about the seal being detected by magnetics, acoustics, or electrical capacitance, resistance, or impedance.
To determine if the seal surface is acceptable for sealing, a reference seal surface image can be stored and associated with the marker of the seal. A user can then capture a current image of the seal surface which is compared to the reference seal surface image to determine differences between the reference seal surface image and current image of the seal surface. If the current image of the seal surface deviates from the reference image more than a predetermined threshold, the system can indicate that the seal needs to be replaced.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate embodiments of the invention and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
The seal 12 may be in the form of any desired seal, such as a gasket, that is placed in between two or more mating surfaces of a sealed element 24. The seal 12 may be composed of any desired material such as a rubber material, plastic material, or other materials used in seals.
The mark 14 may be in the form of any machine-readable optical label, such as a barcode, a QR code, a data matrix, etc. The mark 14 may be associated with information about the seal 12 such as the type of seal 12, the seal model number, the manufacturing date, date of installation of the seal 12, the material(s) of the seal 12, the previous and/or next service interval(s), a photograph or a service report of the previous inspection of the seal 12, the date of replacement of the seal 12, and any other desired information. Also, the mark 14 may be associated with the element 24 to be sealed or other hardware in which the seal 12 is to be installed. The mark 14 may be located on the seal 12 at any desired location. For example, the mark 14 may be located on an edge region 20, e.g. a laterally facing surface such as edge region surface 21 in
The mark 14 may be placed on and/or carved out of the seal 12. For example, the mark 14 can be placed on the seal 12 via a sticker or otherwise. Alternatively, the mark 14 may be etched in the surface of the seal 12 via photoablation by way of a light source 16, e.g. a laser 16. The laser 16 may carve out any desired size, shape, and/or depth of the mark 14, for example, the laser 16 may create a rectangular data matrix which has a depth of approximately 15-20 microns. The laser etching of the mark 14 may occur during a manufacturing or post-manufacturing process of the seal 12. The laser 16 may be in the form of any desired laser, such as any commercially available laser.
Referring now to
Initially, as discussed above, the seal 12 may be marked with a mark 14 such as a QR code. It is also conceivable to additionally mark the element 24 or hardware which is sealed by the seal 12. The method may also include a step of storing relevant data associated with the mark 14 that is located on the seal 12 and/or a mark that is located on the element 24 to be sealed.
The mark 14 and/or the element 24 to be sealed may be identified by scanning the mark 14 and/or the element 24 to be sealed. To identify the seal 12 and/or the sealed element 24, an individual or an automated computer scanner may scan the mark 14. In this regard, an individual may use a phone equipped with an image capturing device 28 to scan the mark 14. Upon scanning the mark 14, the individual may view previously stored data 30 associated with the seal 12 and/or the sealed element 24. As discussed above, the mark 14 may only be scannable or otherwise identifiable when the seal 12 is properly installed.
Capturing information and inspecting the seal 12 may include obtaining an image of the seal 12 and visually checking the seal 12 and/or the sealed element 24. A visual check of the surface of the seal 12 may be conducted to determine if the seal 12 is in an acceptable condition. For example, an individual may conduct a visual analysis, an individual may take a scan, a photograph, or write a report which is uploaded to a remote database and is subsequently checked by the offsite individual or offsite computer program, and/or an onsite computer program may conduct a visual analysis of the seal 12. The visual check may include an analysis of the seal 12 by visually spotting defects in the seal 12 and/or comparing the seal 12 to a previous visual check, such as a previous report or photograph of the seal 12. For instance, to determine whether the seal is acceptable for sealing, an individual may compare a current image of the seal surface to a reference seal surface image, e.g. a previous photograph of the seal 12 or a standard model of the seal, which is associated with the mark 14 and was previously stored in a database. If the current image of the seal surface deviates from the reference seal surface image more than a predetermined threshold, then the individual or computer program may indicate that the seal 12 needs to be repaired or replaced. A visual check of the seal 12 may also be conducted. For example, the visual check of the seal 12 may include visually checking the sealed element 24, visually checking the contact surface(s) of the sealed element 24, and/or visually checking the non-contact or non-sealing surface(s) to which the seal 12 is not attached.
It should be appreciated that inspecting the seal 12 may also include the collection and analysis of any relevant data. For example, the method may also include the collection and analysis of torqueing information between the seal 12 and the sealed element 24. The torqueing information may be automatically collected, e.g. by a torque clamp itself, and the torqueing information may be wirelessly transmitted to a remote database. The torqueing information may be used to produce a torque curve which is indicative of the compression of the seal 12.
Reinstalling or replacing the seal 12 may include the reinstallation of the same seal 12, the repair of the seal 12, or the replacement of the seal 12 such that a new seal 12 is installed.
Rescanning the mark 14 on the seal after installation may also be required since the mark 14 may only be identified upon proper installation, ensuring the seal 14 has been correctly (re)installed. Thereby, the method may be employed to keep a record of the initial installation, the current condition of the seal 12 and/or the sealed element 24, and whether the seal 12 was properly assembled after inspection.
By way of example only, monitoring of gaskets on plate heat exchangers may be provided. In this regard, an individual may scan a mark on a heat exchanger, which is uniquely keyed to a particular location, and/or a mark on the plate heat exchanger seal which seals the different channels of fluids. The individual may capture a picture of the plate heat exchanger gasket using his phone, and the individual may send the picture to an offsite individual who will conduct an analysis of the seal. Depending on whether the offsite individual or computer program determines that the seal is in a proper condition or nonproper condition, the onsite individual may reinstall or replace the plate heat exchanger gasket. After reassembly of the heat exchanger, the onsite individual may rescan the plate heat exchanger seal to ensure that the seal has been properly installed. Additionally, the torqueing information between the tie rods on the plate heat exchanger may be used to further determine whether the plate heat exchanger gasket has been properly assembled after inspection. Thereby, various issues associated with a missing seal, an insufficient torque during heat exchanger assembly, and an ineffective seal may be significantly reduced or entirely eliminated.
While this invention has been described with respect to at least one embodiment, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5121929 | Cobb | Jun 1992 | A |
5678827 | Burian et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5746891 | Withers | May 1998 | A |
6532132 | Tsujimoto et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6666379 | Lake | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6776340 | Murokh et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6835424 | Larson, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845983 | Suggs et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7068170 | Green | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7158034 | Corbett, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7372366 | Lyon et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388506 | Abbott | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7405818 | Heinzen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7477374 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7594613 | Sato et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602409 | Sato | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7665355 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7728048 | LaBrec | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7927685 | LaBrec et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7969308 | Cotton | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8060264 | Oestermeyer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083152 | Theodossiou | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091791 | Brémond et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8166891 | Borowski et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8225721 | Hunter | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8282013 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8558861 | Wanjek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8624154 | McElroy et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8642161 | Kuntz et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8651801 | Shamseldin et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8777112 | Mieslinger | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8893973 | Shaffer et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8893975 | Sanford | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9168696 | Farrell | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9200204 | Marguerettaz et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224196 | Duerksen et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9343434 | Chen | May 2016 | B2 |
9508696 | Chen | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9517855 | Murokh | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9528885 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9555662 | Marcos et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9662833 | Farrell et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9710720 | Mitti | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9710902 | Di Venuto Dayer et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10663093 | Lennon | May 2020 | B2 |
20020150739 | Nagashima et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050156487 | Tseng | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20080236819 | Foster et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120112416 | Berg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20140091093 | Rothweiler et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140217074 | Thor | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150151483 | Ewing et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150248570 | Johansen et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150285054 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287152 | Oakes | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160098581 | Ascencio et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160178057 | Sabotta et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160193864 | Farrell et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160214399 | Phillips et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160321513 | Mitti et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170014945 | Fraser et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170043530 | Farrell et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170081069 | Murokh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170146975 | Clark | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2009 016 429 | Oct 2010 | DE |
Entry |
---|
“Railcar Manway Gasket For General Applications”, Parker Hannifin, taken from https://www.parker.com/literature/Seal%20Group/ISS%205814%20Manway%202014-05.pdf, May 30, 2017 (2 pages). |
“Manway Gaskets for the Rail Industry, Reduce Labor Operating Costs by 90%”, Parker Hannifin Corporation, 2014 (6 pages). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration dated Nov. 19, 2018 for International Application No. PCT/US2018/050403 (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190078972 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62556526 | Sep 2017 | US |