The invention relates to a sealing device for repair of cardiac and vascular defects or tissue opening such as a patent foramen ovale (PFO) or shunt in the heart, the vascular system, etc. and particularly provides an occluder device and trans-catheter occluder delivery system.
Sealing devices may be utilized for the occlusion of many types of tissue openings, such as septal defects, PFO, and the like.
Tissue openings have traditionally been corrected by open-heart surgery. In order to avoid the trauma and complications associated with open-heart surgery, a variety of trans-catheter closure techniques have been implemented. In such techniques, an occluding device is delivered through a catheter to the site of the opening or defect. A device is placed into the defect and permanently deployed.
A variety of trans-catheter delivered devices are known. These include devices that require assembly at the site of the tissue opening or require threading or “buttoning” of the discrete device elements. Other devices include self-expanding devices. These self-expanding devices tend to be difficult to visualize, cumbersome to load, difficult to position at the site of a tissue opening, and reposition. Most self-expanding devices do not conform to heart anatomy leading to tissue erosion.
An example of a self-expanding device includes an occlusion bag, a third tube, a guide catheter, a super elastic wire, a release mechanism and a delivery sheath. The super elastic wire is attached to the release mechanism and the wire, release mechanism, occlusion bag, guide catheter and third tube are inserted into a delivery sheath for transport to the aperture. After delivery, the occlusion bag is placed within the aperture and the wire is deployed within the bag. The bag and wire are repositioned if necessary, and the release mechanism is activated to release the wire.
Another example of a self-expanding device includes a shape set tubular metal fabric device and optionally, an occluding fiber included in the hollow portions of the device. The metal fabric defines a medical device shaped like a bell, which can be collapsed for passage through a catheter for deployment in a channel of a patient's body.
While these and other self-expanding devices are designed for trans-catheter delivery, they require assembly either prior to use or during use. They are also difficult to reposition or retrieve once deployed and provide poor conformity to heart anatomy. For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide an improved sealing device for use in trans-catheter techniques. Such sealing devices would preferably have improved conformity to heart anatomy and be easily deployed, repositioned, and retrieved at the opening site.
Trans-catheter self-expanding sealing devices may be delivered and deployed by a variety of means. Most trans-catheter delivery devices choose one of two basic systems for deploying the device: pulling back an outer catheter to release the device or pushing the device free of the catheter with a push rod. Each of these systems utilizes a handle to actuate the mechanism used to deploy the device. An example of such a system includes a flexible urging member for urging the sealing device through a catheter and a remotely located control means for advancing the urging member. In this example, the control means includes a threaded, tubular shaft connected to the urging member and a manually rotatable threaded rotor mounted on the shaft. The threads on the rotor mate with the threads on the shaft so that the rotation of the rotor through a known angle will advance the shaft and the urging member a known distance.
An example of a system that utilizes a pull back outer shaft or catheter includes a handle that may selectively hold the delivery system components at any configuration during deployment and positioning of the device. The outer catheter of such a system would be pulled back to release the device by actuating a sliding lever and a rotating finger ring on the delivery system handle.
While these and other device delivery systems are designed for trans-catheter device deployment, they require the use of a threaded rotor, which can become difficult to rotate or they require large forces to pull back the outer catheter to expose the entire length of the constrained device. Most deployment systems are either not reversible or very difficult to reverse once the deployment procedure has taken place. For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide an improved delivery system for a sealing device. Such delivery system would preferably have a handle able to be operated simply with a single hand and would be able to execute multiple manipulations with minimal force or hand movement.
A first embodiment provides a sealing device having an expandable frame formed from a plurality of wires extending from a proximal end to a distal end of the frame with the wires forming a proximal and distal eyelet with a sealing member at least partially encapsulating the expandable wire frame.
A further embodiment provides a handle for deploying a sealing device having a housing having a slot and a length with a linear actuator located within the slot and the linear actuator capable of independently advancing and retracting at least three separate components by advancing and retracting the actuator along the slot length.
An additional embodiment provides an apparatus comprising a handle having a housing having a slot with a length and a linear actuator located within the slot the linear actuator capable of independently advancing and retracting at least three separate components by advancing and retracting the actuator along the slot length. The apparatus also comprising a sealing device having an expandable frame formed from a plurality of wires extending from a proximal end to a distal end of the frame with the wires forming a proximal and distal eyelet with a sealing member at least partially encapsulating the expandable wire frame.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description or may be learned by practice of the invention. These features and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
In the drawings:
A first embodiment provides a sealing device having an expandable frame formed from a plurality of wires extending from a proximal end to a distal end of the frame with the wires forming a proximal and distal eyelet with a sealing member at least partially encapsulating the expandable wire frame.
Also shown in
First tube 102 may house the second tube 108. The second tube 108 is essentially tubular with an oval cross section and can have an outer diameter suitable to fit inside first tube 102. A preferred outer diameter range would be from about 1.27×0.68 mm and would be flared at the distal end. The second tube 108 may be fabricated from any suitable biocompatible material including polymers or metals. A preferable material would be PEEK (polyetheretherketone). Second tube 108 can be used to aid in the delivery and deployment of sealing device 100 to a defect site. Second tube 108 is threaded through the eyelets of sealing device 100 to hold sealing device 100 on the delivery system and to provide stability while deploying the sealing device 100. Sealing device eyelets will be discussed further.
Retrieval cord 110 is looped through two of the smaller lumens of the first tube 102 and through the proximal eyelet of the sealing device 100 to provide attachment to the delivery system and a method of retrieval once the sealing device has been deployed. Retrieval cord 110 extends through the length of first tube 102 with the ends terminating at the handle used for deploying sealing device 100. Retrieval cord 110 may be manufactured of any biocompatible material of sufficient strength and size. A preferable material is ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).
As shown in
Wire frame 200 and other wire frames shown are formed from elastic wire materials that have outer diameters between 0.12 and 0.4 mm. In a preferable embodiment, wire outer diameter size would be about 0.3 mm. When formed, wire frame 200 comprises a distal bumper 208, distal eyelet 204, locking loop 206, an optional center eyelet 203, and proximal eyelet 202.
Construction of wire frame 200 may be accomplished by a variety of means including machine winding with automatic wire tensioning or by hand winding with weights suspended from each wire during construction. Shown in
A winding jig may be used to secure and form the elastic wires during construction and processing of the sealing device 100. A typical winding jig may be constructed as commonly known in the arts. Materials used for construction of such a winding jig have been discussed previously. A preferable winding jig is shown in
Also shown in
Another embodiment of the device is a self centering device 600. Shown in
Wire frame 40 and other wire frames shown are formed from elastic wire materials that have outer diameters between 0.12 and 0.4 mm. When formed, wire frame 40 comprises a first eyelet 41, a second eyelet 42, a plurality of wires 43, a closed teardrop shape with an internal area 44 and inner peripheral edge 46 and an outer peripheral edge 45. In an end view of a deployed device, the outer peripheral edge 45 is shown as the outermost edge of the wire frame 40. The inner peripheral edge 46 of wire frame 40 is illustrated by the inner most edge of the internal area 44 of the closed teardrop shape. In the deployed configuration a wire and closed teardrop shape will nest or interleaf itself between the wire form of the next wire of the device. In a deployed configuration, the inner peripheral edge 46 will at least in part center itself within a cardiac defect or other tissue gap.
The wire frame 40 may be covered with a sealing member as previously described.
An alternate embodiment of a sealing device may be made by procuring two sealing device frames and seating one inside the other. Then covering the resulting frame as previously described. Such a device is described in example 6. An embodiment such as this may be manufactured with similar materials and methods as described previously and subsequently described. This technique may be used with any of the wire frames described herein.
An embodiment is illustrated in
The wire frame 51, as illustrated in
A lock loop 43 (illustrated in
Another embodiment is shown in
Anchor components or fixation devices may be attached to any of the embodiments. Examples of anchor complements (80 and 96) are shown in
Typical handles, handle components, tools or catheters used to deliver medical devices can comprise commonly known materials such as Amorphous Commodity Thermoplastics that include Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA or Acrylic), Polystyrene (PS), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Modified Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PETG), Cellulose Acetate Butyrate (CAB); Semi-Crystalline Commodity Plastics that include Polyethylene (PE), High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE or LLDPE), Polypropylene (PP), Polymethylpentene (PMP); Amorphous Engineering Thermoplastics that include Polycarbonate (PC), Polyphenylene Oxide (PPO), Modified Polyphenylene Oxide (Mod PPO), Polyphenelyne Ether (PPE), Modified Polyphenelyne Ether (Mod PPE), Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU); Semi-Crystalline Engineering Thermoplastics that include Polyamide (PA or Nylon), Polyoxymethylene (POM or Acetal), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET, Thermoplastic Polyester), Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT, Thermoplastic Polyester), Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMW-PE); High Performance Thermoplastics that include Polyimide (PI, Imidized Plastic), Polyamide Imide (PAI, Imidized Plastic), Polybenzimidazole (PBI, Imidized Plastic); Amorphous High Performance Thermoplastics that include Polysulfone (PSU), Polyetherimide (PEI), Polyether Sulfone (PES), Polyaryl Sulfone (PAS); Semi-Crystalline High Performance Thermoplastics that include Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS), Polyetheretherketone (PEEK); and Semi-Crystalline High Performance Thermoplastics, Fluoropolymers that include Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene (FEP), Ethylene Chlorotrifluroethylene (ECTFE), Ethylene, Ethylene Tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE), Polychlortrifluoroethylene (PCTFE), Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF), Perfluoroalkoxy (PFA). Other commonly known medical grade materials include elastomeric organosilicon polymers, polyether block amide or thermoplastic copolyether (PEBAX) and metals such as stainless steel and nickel/titanium alloys.
A distal notch 1104 and proximal notch 1106 in sizing insert 1103 may be used to aid in the positioning of the first linear actuator 802 in housing slot 812. The distance between the two notches, 1104 and 1106 respectively, may be the length of sealing device 100 when it is elongated over second tube 108 prior to loading onto the delivery system. Sizing insert 1103 may be sized to accommodate a variety of device lengths and is preferably from about 22.28 cm long with a distance between the proximal end of distal notch 1104 and proximal end of proximal notch 1106 from about 6.25-13.32 cm. Notches 1104 and 1106 may be of any shape but are preferably rectangular.
The first linear actuator 802 is then moved to a mid point in slot 812 toward the proximal end of the housing 810. This action causes the first tube 102 to move proximally and the sealing device 100 proximal end to move proximally, thus elongating sealing device 100. First linear actuator 802 may be any shape (lever, ball) but is preferably shaped to accommodate a clinician's thumb. First linear actuator 802 may be constructed of any material with suitable mechanical properties but is preferably a material similar to that of sizing insert 1103. A feature of the first linear actuator 802 are recessed teeth formed in the top portion of the first linear actuator 802 for securing retrieval cord 110. This feature is preferred but optional. The teeth could be made into any tortuous path or have any shape desired to create resistance for retrieval cord 110 during loading, deployment, or retrieval of sealing device 100. Corresponding protruding teeth (not shown) may be formed in the bottom surface of retrieval cord lock 803. These teeth may fit together and hold the retrieval cord firmly. Other methods commonly known in the art for securing a small diameter cord may also be used and will be discussed in detail in a following section.
The first linear actuator 802 is then moved further proximally until the device is loaded in third tube 104. During this action, spring 1100 pushes the first linear actuator 802 and the mandrel control lever 1000 to the left of slot 812 and into the proximal notch 1106 in sizing insert 1103. The second tube 108 is free to move proximally with sealing device 100 and first tube 102. As the first linear actuator 802 is moved proximally, the second tube 108, sealing device 100 and first tube 102 slide or translate into the third tube 104. After the first linear actuator 802 is in its proximal most position, the system may again be flushed with saline in the manner described above.
Alternate embodiments of first linear actuator 802 are shown in
Deploying sealing device 100 into a defect is described in
Locking the device is described in the flowchart illustrated in
An alternate embodiment of second linear actuator 806 is shown in
Once the second linear actuator 808 is gripped, a clinician may move the second linear actuator 806 proximally. This action results in proximal movement of third tube 104, mandrel control lever 1000, sizing insert 1103 and second tube 108. Second tube 108 moves proximally from between eyelets of the device. An alternate method of achieving this action would be to provide a twist mechanism to the distal end of the handle instead of a second linear actuator 806. This twist mechanism would be provided with a slot that allows for the same movement of the third tube 104, mandrel control lever 1000, sizing insert 1103 and second tube 108 as the second linear actuator 806.
Once lock release has been achieved, the retrieval cord lock 803 is then twisted to remove it from the first linear actuator 802 and pulled until the retrieval cord 110 is free of the delivery system. Retrieval cord 110 is attached to the retrieval cord lock 803 at one end. Retrieval cord 110 may be constructed of any material with suitable mechanical properties such as Kevlar®, flexible metal wire, polymers and the like. A preferably material for retrieval cord 110 is an ePTFE fiber. Retrieval cord lock 803 may be configured in a variety of shapes and sizes. Possible retrieval cord locks may be designed to provide a slot in the linear actuator 802 through which the retrieval passes. In one configuration, the retrieval cord is secured by passing the cord through a slot or hole in the axis of the thumb wheel disposed in the linear actuator 802 and tightened by twisting the thumb wheel. An alternate configuration would provide a slide lock that binds the retrieval cord between the lock and the linear actuator 802 using friction. A preferred design would be to secure the retrieval cord between teeth formed in the retrieval cord lock as shown in
Materials suitable for constructing retrieval cord lock 803 are similar to that used to construct housing 810 and other handle components. As mentioned previously, retrieval cord lock 803 preferably has teeth or protrusions that correspond to indentations in linear actuator 802 for the purpose of gripping retrieval cord 110. Retrieval cord lock 803 may be configured in a variety of shapes to enable retrieval cord 110 to be secured. A preferred configuration would include apertures through the retrieval cord lock 803 to allow retrieval cord 110 to be threaded therethrough and knotted. After twisting the retrieval cord lock 803, it is pulled until the retrieval cord 110 is removed from the delivery system.
Prior to the step four described in
Without intending to limit the scope of the invention, the following examples illustrate how various embodiments of the invention may be made and/or used.
A sealing device similar to
An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene material was obtained with the following properties:
Methanol bubble point of 1 psi
Mass/area of 2.2 grams/square meter
Longitudinal maximum load of 1.6 kg/inch
Thickness of 0.0003 inch
Longitudinal matrix tensile strength of 92000 psi
The following test methods and equipment were used to determine the above-mentioned properties: Methanol bubble point was measured using a custom built machine with a 1 inch diameter foot, a ramp rate of 0.2 psi/second and a liquid media of methanol. Length and width of the material were measured using a metal ruler. Mass/area was measured using a balance (Model GF-400 Top Loader Balance, ANG, San Jose, Calif.) with a 36×5 inch sample. Longitudinal maximum load was measured using a materials test machine (Model 5564, Instron, Grove City, Pa.) equipped with a 10 kg load cell. The gauge length was 1 inch and the cross head speed was 25 mm/minute. Sample width was 1 inch. Longitudinal tensile test measurements were taken in the length direction of the material. Thickness was measured using a thickness gauge (Mitutoyo Digital Indicator 547-400) with a foot diameter of ¼ inch. The longitudinal matrix tensile strengths (MTS) were calculated using the following equation: Density was calculated using the formula, density=mass/volume.
An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene with a thin layer of FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) material was obtained with the following properties:
Mass/area of 36.1 grams/square meter
Maximum Load, Longitudinal of 12.6 kg/inch
Maximum Load, Transverse of 0.3 kg/inch
Thickness of 0.0012 inch
The following test methods and equipment were used to determine the above-mentioned properties: Material was weighed using a precision analytical balance (Model GF-400 Top Loader Balance, ANG, San Jose, Calif.) with a sample area of 36×1 inch sample. Length and width of the material were measured using a metal ruler. Material thickness was measured using a digital thickness gauge (Mitutoyo Digital Indicator 547-400) with a foot diameter of ¼ inch. Maximum transverse load was measured using a materials test machine (Model 5564, Instron, Grove City, Pa.) equipped with a 10 kg load cell. The sample width was 1 inch, the gauge length was 1 inch and the cross head speed was 25 mm/minute. Maximum longitudinal load was measured using a materials test machine (Model 5564, Instron, Grove City, Pa.) equipped with a 200 kg load cell. The sample width was 1 inch, the gauge length was 1 inch and the cross head speed was 25 mm/minute. Longitudinal tensile test measurements were taken in the length direction of the material and transverse tensile test measurements were taken in the direction orthogonal to the length direction.
A distal eyelet was formed by first obtaining a length of 10% platinum drawn filled nitinol wire (Fort Wayne Metals, Fort Wayne, Ind.) with a diameter of about 0.23 mm. This wire was labeled “first wire”. A free end of the first wire was doubled on itself to create an open-ended loop and the open-ended loop was inserted into the button. The button was then inserted onto the keyed center pin. The button was shaped to have an opening through the center to accommodate the keyed center pin and to have features that allow it to rest securely in the winding jig. The keyed center pin (major axis of about 0.51 mm and minor axis of about 0.25 mm and length of about 10.16 mm) was then inserted in the center of a winding jig. The keyed center pin was fabricated from high strength steel (Super Cobalt HSS Tool Bit, MSC #56424278, Seco Fagersta). The steel was tempered per manufacture's instructions at 1475° F. for one hour. The winding jig and button were fabricated in house from corrosion resistant tool steel.
A second length of the same type of drawn filled nitinol wire was obtained and labeled “fifth wire”. The first, fifth and an additional three wires were tensioned by attaching weights to the wire ends. The first wire and the fifth wire were then wound around the free end of the first wire one full revolution. The three additional wires were introduced to the winding jig and all five wires were wound around the free end of the first wire to a height of about 1.98 mm.
A distal disk was then formed by separating the five wires and securing them in radial grooves around the circumferential edge of the winding jig. A radius was formed with the dimensions of 15 mm. Each wire formed one petal of the distal disk. The radius on the curvature of the petals was maximized in order to minimize sharp bend angles in the wire.
A center eyelet was formed by grouping the wires together and winding them around the free end of the first wire and the keyed center pin to a height of about 1.98 mm. The wires were then separated and secured in radial grooves around the circumferential edge of the winding jib creating a proximal disk with a radius of 15 mm.
A proximal eyelet was formed by again grouping the five wires and winding them around the free end of the first wire and the keyed center pin to a height of about 1.98 mm. The five wires were then separated and secured by placing a stainless steel plate on top of the wires and locking down the plate with screws. The free end of the first wire was then wound one revolution around a stainless steel pin with a diameter of about 3.18 mm and secured similarly to the other five wires.
The jig with sealing device was then removed from the stabilizing fixture and placed in an oven (BlueM SPX Electric Forced Air Convection Oven) and the wires were thermally shape set as commonly known in the arts. The device and jig were then water quenched. The secured wires were released from the securing plate and the device was chilled and removed from the jig and keyed center pin. The device was then placed on a piece of flattened PEEK (polyetherether ketone) and trimmed by hand to the outer diameter of the distal eyelet. The lock loop was trimmed by hand to a point just beyond one complete revolution and pulled through the proximal and center eyelets.
The device was pushed from the PEEK mandrel onto a keyed stainless steel process mandrel with an oval cross section. The mandrel was produced from flattened stainless steel wire (Ft. Wayne Metals, Fort Wayne, Ind.) with an oval cross-section to have a 45° clockwise twist between the proximal eyelet and the center eyelet and a second 45° clockwise twist between the center eyelet and the distal eyelet.
The process mandrel and device were then placed in a stabilizing fixture which was placed in a FEP powder coating machine (C-30, Electrostatic Technology, Inc., Bradford, Conn.) and processed until coated completely. Excess FEP powder was removed from the device. The FEP was vacuumed from the lock loop, process mandrel and bumper. The process mandrel and device were removed from the stabilizing fixture, placed into an oven and baked to set the FEP coating as commonly known in the arts.
A hollow core film mandrel (35.99 mm O.D. 76.2 cm long stainless steel) was obtained. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene material with a slit width of 22.22 mm was obtained and loaded onto a spiral wrapping machine. The machine was manufactured in house to wrap PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) material at any desired angle, tension and rate. The mandrel was loaded onto the wrapping machine and the material was wrapped three times around the circumference of the hollow core mandrel. The material was then wrapped around the mandrel at an angle of about 8° for the length of the mandrel. The direction of wrapping was reversed and the material over wrapped at the same angle. The third and fourth layers were wrapped in the same manner with the seams offset. The mandrel was removed from the wrapping machine, inserted in an oven and baked at 370° C. for 45 minutes. The wrapped mandrel was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature. The resulting PTFE tube was removed from the mandrel.
The PTFE tube was then cut to about 140 mm and hand stretched to a desired length 155 mm. The PTFE tube was then pulled over the frame. The PTFE tube was then crimped onto the center eyelet and then crimped onto the distal and proximal eyelets.
An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene with a thin layer of FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) material was then wrapped four times around the eyelets starting with the center eyelet. The wrapped eyelets were tacked into place a soldering iron. The PTFE tube was then heat set for 3 minutes at 320° C. and trimmed to the outer most points of the proximal and distal eyelets. The device was removed from the mandrel.
A sealing device similar to
Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene with a thin layer of FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) materials similar to that described in Example 1 were obtained.
A distal eyelet was formed by first obtaining a length of 10% platinum drawn filled nitinol wire (Fort Wayne Metals, Fort Wayne, Ind.) with a diameter of about 0.23 mm. This wire was labeled “first wire”. A free end of the first wire was doubled on itself to create an open-ended loop and the open-ended loop was inserted into the button. The button was then inserted onto the keyed center pin. The button was shaped to have an opening through the center to accommodate the keyed center pin and to have features that allow it to rest securely in the winding jig. The keyed center pin (major axis of about 5.79 mm and minor axis of about 0.25 mm and length of about 10.16 mm) was inserted in the center of a winding jig. The keyed center pin was fabricated from high strength steel (Super Cobalt HSS Tool Bit, MSC #56424278, Seco Fagersta). The winding jig and button were fabricated in house from corrosion resistant tool steel.
A second length of the same type of drawn filled nitinol wire was obtained and labeled “fifth wire”. The first, fifth and an additional three wires were tensioned by attaching weights to the wire ends. The first wire and the fifth wire were then wound around the free end of the first wire one full revolution. The three additional wires were introduced to the winding jig and all five wires were wound around the free end of the first wire to a height of about 1.98 mm.
A device was then formed by separating the five wires and securing them in radial grooves around the circumferential edge of the winding jig. A radius was formed with the dimensions of 15 mm. Each wire made an entire revolution around the winding jig.
A proximal eyelet was formed by grouping the five wires and winding them around the free end of the first wire and the keyed center pin to a height of about 1.981 mm. The five wires were then separated and secured by placing a stainless steel plate on top of the wires and locking down the plate with screws. The free end of the first wire was then wound one revolution around a stainless steel pin with a diameter of about 3.18 mm and secured similarly to the other five wires.
The jig with sealing device was removed from the stabilizing fixture and placed in an oven (Blue M SPX Electric Forced Air Convection Oven) where the wires were partially thermally shape set as commonly known in the arts. The device and jig were then water quenched. The secured wires were released from the securing plate and then the device was chilled and removed from the jig and keyed center pin. The lock loop was trimmed by hand to a point just beyond one complete revolution and pulled through the proximal and center eyelets.
The device was pushed from the PEEK mandrel onto a keyed stainless steel transfer mandrel with an oval cross section. The mandrel was produced from flattened stainless steel wire (Ft. Wayne Metals, Fort Wayne, Ind.) with an oval cross-section. The device was then partially removed from one end of the transfer mandrel. The removed device end was twisted approximately 180° clockwise and repositioned on the transfer mandrel. The device and transfer mandrel were placed in an oven (Blue M SPX Electric Forced Air Convection Oven) where the wires were thermally shape set as commonly known in the arts.
The transfer mandrel and device were then placed in a stabilizing fixture which was placed in a FEP powder coating machine (C-30, Electrostatic Technology, Inc., Bradford, Conn.) and processed until coated completely. Excess FEP powder was removed. FEP powder was vacuumed from the lock loop, process mandrel and bumper. The transfer mandrel and device were then removed from the stabilizing fixture, placed into an oven and baked to set the FEP coating as commonly known in the arts.
A hollow core film mandrel (35.99 mm O.D. 76.2 cm long stainless steel) was obtained. An ePTFE material with a slit width of 22.24 mm was obtained and loaded onto a spiral wrapping machine. The machine was manufactured in house to wrap ePTFE film at any desired angle, tension and rate. The mandrel was loaded onto the wrapping machine and the film was wrapped three times around the circumference of the hollow core mandrel. The ePTFE material was then wrapped around the mandrel at an angle of about 8° for the length of the mandrel. The direction of wrapping was reversed and the material over wrapped at the same angle. The third and fourth layers were wrapped in the same manner with the seams offset. The mandrel was removed from the wrapping machine, inserted in an oven and baked at 370° C. for 45 minutes. The wrapped mandrel was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature. The resulting ePTFE tube was removed from the mandrel.
The ePTFE tube was then cut to about 140 mm and hand stretched to a desired length 155 mm. The ePTFE tube was then pulled over the frame. The ePTFE tube was then crimped onto the distal and proximal eyelets. An ePTFE with a thin layer of FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) material was then wrapped four times around the eyelets. The wrapped eyelets were tacked into place a soldering iron. The ePTFE tube was then heat set for 3 minutes at 320° C. and trimmed to the outer most points of the proximal and distal eyelets. The device was then removed from the mandrel.
An handle assembly similar to
Components for the handle assembly were fabricated using an injection molding process. The parts were fabricated by Contour Plastics (Baldwin, Wis.) using Lustran® 348. This material was suitable for use in medical devices and has an advertised tensile strength of 48.2 MPa and a tensile modulus of 2.62 GPa. Nine parts were fabricated using this injection process and Lustran® 348. The parts included the second linear actuator, flushing gasket retainer, a first linear actuator, retrieval cord lock, mandrel control lever, left body housing, sizing insert, right body housing, and a lock release actuator.
Other materials required for the assembly of the handle were purchased items. A catheter tube formed with a layup process commonly known in the arts was ordered (Teleflex Medical, Jaffrey, N.H.) with an I.D. of 0.048 mm and an O.D. of 0.33 mm and a platinum iridium marker band placed near the end of the distal tip. The main body of the catheter tube was Pebax® 7233 tube with PTFE liner and stainless steel braid (65 PPI) and the distal most 20.32 mm of the catheter tube was comprised of 6333 Pebax® (0.027 mm I.D. and an 0.033 mm O.D.) and a curve in the distal end (39.98 mm radius). A guidewire port formed by a laser was placed in the catheter tube proximal of the marker band. A flushing gasket or u-cup type gasket made of silicone (22.99 mm depth, I.D. tapered from 2.89 mm to 1.85 mm I.D. tapered from 6.71 mm to 7.75 mm) was procured from Apple Rubber of Lancaster, N.Y. A flushing port (Merit Medical, South Jordan, Utah) having an about six inch flexible pvc (polyvinyl chloride) tube with a 3.18 mm O.D. female luer connector was obtained. A quick set cyanoacrylate adhesive was supplied from in-house stock. Stainless steel hypotubes were ordered from Small Parts, Inc. (1.45 mm O.D., 1.30 mm I.D., length of 30.48 cm.). Slider rods (PTFE coated stainless steel hypotubes, 3.18 mm O.D., 1.65 mm I.D., length of 33.02 cm) were procured from Applied Plastics. Control springs (PTFE-coated stainless steel leaf springs, thickness 0.10 mm, minor flange length 5.33 mm, major flange length 10.11 mm, overall length 15.88 mm) were ordered from Incodema of Ithaca, N.Y.
The remainder of the components were supplied from in house stock or manufactured in house. All triple lumen tubes were manufactured of Pebax® 7233 with 20% barium sulfate. Both triple lumen tubes had an O.D. (outer diameter) of 0.25 mm. One triple lumen tube had round lumens with two I.D.s (inner diameters) of 0.035 mm and one I.D. of 0.15 mm. One triple lumen tube had one lumen with an oval cross-section with two I.D.s of 0.036 mm and one I.D of 0.127×0.07 mm. Stainless steel PTFE coated (polytetrafluoroethylene) process mandrels were manufactured in house. One process mandrel had a cross-sectional shape that transitioned from round (O.D. of 0.16 mm) to oval (O.D. of 0.14×0.07 mm). PTFE covered stainless steel wire was procured from in house stock (O.D. 0.03 mm). Standard luer fittings were obtained from in house stock. A PEEK (polyetheretherketone) second tube extrusion was obtained from in house stock with an oval cross-section of 1.27×0.69 mm O.D.
A first tube was made in the following manner. One triple lumen extruded tube with round lumens was obtained. Another triple lumen extruded tube was obtained with one lumen having an oval cross-section. A stainless steel processing mandrel was also obtained having a cross-sectional shape, which transitions from round (O.D. of 1.52 mm), to oval (O.D. of 1.39×0.81 mm). Both extruded tubes were loaded onto the mandrel with the mandrel being inserted through the larger lumen on both tubes. Two small PTFE covered stainless steel wires were inserted through the smaller lumens of both extruded tubes. The mandrel and tubes were inserted into a RF (radio frequency) die (2.51 mm I.D., 4.45 mm length, fabricated from D2 tool steel). The junction of the two catheters was positioned in the center of the RF die. The RF die and mandrel was placed in the middle of an RF coil on an RF welding machine (Hot Shot I, Ameritherm Inc., Scottsville, N.Y.) and welded as commonly known in the art. When the components had reflowed, pressure was applied to each end of the extruded tubes to meld the junction of the tubes. The die was then sprayed with compressed air to cool the die and to set the Pebax®. The extruded tube and die were removed from the RF machine and the extruded tube was removed from the die. The process mandrel and wires were removed from the lumens of the extruded tube.
A lubricious coating may be applied to the second tube. A silicone mold release spray (Nix Stix X-9032A, Dwight Products, Inc., Lyndhurst, N.J.) may be sprayed onto about the distal 30 cm of the second tube and allowed to dry at ambient temperature under a fume hood.
A third tube sub-assembly was made in the following manner. A catheter tube was bisected with a straight razor at approximately 6.35 cm from the proximal end of the catheter tube. A male and female in-line luer connector (Qosina, Edgewood, N.Y.) was obtained and drilled to an I.D. of 3.45 mm. U.V. (ultra-violet) cured adhesive (Loctite 3041) was applied to the bisected ends of the catheter tube and the drilled luer fittings were attached. The adhesive was cured per manufacture's instructions and the luer fittings were screwed together.
The second linear actuator sub-assembly was made in the following manner. The second linear actuator, flushing port, flushing gasket retainer and silicone flushing gasket were obtained. The flushing gasket was inserted into the back of the second linear actuator with the u portion of the flushing gasket facing distally. The flushing gasket retainer was fitted over the top inside the second linear actuator. Cyanoacrylate glue was applied around the gasket retainer to hold the gasket retainer in place. The flushing port was placed into an aperture in the second linear actuator and an U.V. cure adhesive was applied and cured according to manufactures instructions.
A first tube was obtained and cyanoacrylate was applied to the outside surface of the round I.D. section of the catheter in a 2.54 cm band from the end. The catheter was then inserted into the distal end of the control shuttle until the catheter became flush with the back of the control shuttle. The catheter was oriented so that the two small lumens were horizontal and on the top portion of the round lumen. The retrieval cord lock was snapped onto the control shuttle.
The second tube sub-assembly was manufactured in the following manner. A four inch piece of 0.033 mm diameter nitinol wire was inserted into the second tube extrusion. The second tube extrusion with wire insert was inserted into a hypotube. The distal end of the hypotube was crimped by hand three times.
The distal end of the first tube was threaded through the top of the mandrel control lever and through the top aperture on the distal end of the mandrel control lever. The distal end of the second tube was threaded into the proximal end of the control catheter. The second tube was pushed into the first tube until about 4 in. of hypotube were protruding from the end of the control catheter. A cyanoacrylate adhesive was applied to the proximal end of the hypotube over about a 12.7 mm section. This section was inserted into the top aperture in the proximal end of the mandrel control lever until flush with the back of the mandrel control lever. The distal end of the first tube was then threaded into the proximal end of the second linear actuator. The second linear actuator was moved to the back most position on the control catheter.
A sizing insert was then fitted into a left body shell. The sizing insert was oriented so that the groove in the sizing insert fit over the ridge in the left shell. The catheter sub assembly was placed into the left body shell so that the mandrel control lever fit into the sizing insert and the second linear actuator fit into the slot in the distal end of the left body shell. A slider rod was inserted through the openings in the sizing insert, mandrel control lever, control shuttle and the second linear actuator. The slider rod was made to rest on two supports in the left body shell. The control spring was inserted into the right body shell so that it fit into the opposing teeth. The right body shell was then placed onto the left body shell and the two were snapped together. Two screws (#4-24×½ in. thread-forming Pan Head) were inserted into the available apertures on the left body shell and tightened. The lock release actuator was snapped into place on the right tab of the second linear actuator with a drop of cyanoacrylate adhesive to ensure that it remained attached.
The second linear actuator, control shuttle, and the mandrel control lever were moved to their forward most positions. The second linear actuator was pulled back and then returned to its forward position. The distal end of the first tube was trimmed by hand with a razor blade to 1.27 mm measured from the tip of the third tube. The sizing insert was pushed forward. The second tube was trimmed by hand using a razor blade to a length of about 0.76 mm measured from the distal most end of the control catheter. An about 4 inch long piece of nitinol wire (0.30 mm diameter) was obtained. A cyanoacrylate adhesive was applied into the tip of the second tube with an elongated applicator tip. The nitinol wire was inserted into the tip of the locking and another piece of wire was used to insert the nitinol wire about 2 mm into the second tube. The cyanoacrylate adhesive was allowed to cure.
The second linear actuator was pulled back and a slot was punched out of the control catheter. The slot had a width that was about the same width as the small axis of the oval lumen of the catheter. A razor was used to skive the slot to a final length of about 19.05 mm. The second linear actuator and the sizing insert were then moved to a forward position.
A retrieval cord approximately 3.05 m long (PTFE fiber with a 0.25 mm O.D.) and a 1.52 m (0.15 mm O.D.) nitinol wire were obtained. The nitinol wire was inserted into one of the 0.04 mm lumens in the first tube and pushed through until it came out into the handle. Tweezers were used to grasp the wire and pull it out of the slot in the handle. About 76.2 mm of wire were made to protrude from the distal end of the control catheter. A loop was formed in the wire by inserting the loose end into the same lumen at the distal end of the control catheter. About 76.2 mm of retrieval cord was then threaded through the resulting loop. The nitinol wire was pulled through the catheter until the retrieval cord protruded into the handle.
A sealing device was obtained. A needle of a type commonly used for sewing was threaded with the retrieval cord and the needle was inserted through the PTFE bag opposite the lock loop and through the lumen of the proximal eyelet of the sealing device. The nitinol wire was then threaded through the remaining unoccupied 0.04 mm lumen in the first tube with the loop end of the wire pointing distally. The needle was removed from the retrieval cord and the cord was threaded through the loop on the nitinol wire. The retrieval cord was then pulled through the catheter in the manner described previously.
The control shuttle was retracted approximately 12.7 mm. The second tube was then threaded through the eyelets of the device. Tweezers were used to grasp the retrieval cord and pull in to the outside of the handle. A loop was formed in a portion of small diameter nitinol wire. The loop was inserted through an aperture in the distal portion of the top of the control shuttle. The retrieval cord was threaded through this loop and pulled through the aperture in the distal portion of the control shuttle. The retrieval cord lock was removed from the control shuttle and one free end of the retrieval cord was inserted through the aperture in the retrieval cord lock from the bottom. Four over hand knots were tied in the cord. Excess cord was trimmed by hand and the retrieval cord lock was returned to the control shuttle.
The remaining free retrieval cord was pulled until all slack was gone. The remaining free end of the retrieval cord was inserted into an aperture in the front of the top of the control shuttle. The retrieval cord was pulled until taught and the retrieval cord lock was snapped closed. The cord was trimmed by hand to about 20.32 cm.
The second tube was flared by obtaining a soldering iron with a sharp tip and heating it to about 500° F. The tip of the iron was inserted into the second tube until a flare was created that was approximately 1.39 mm in diameter. The locking loop on the device was chilled.
A length of 0.23 mm diameter nitinol wire (Fort Wayne Metals, Fort Wayne, Ind.) was obtained. The specific length of the wire was not measured, it is only necessary that the wire be long enough to double through the feed holes described in the following paragraph. The wire was obtained having been electro polished.
A base jig 8 as described in
The other end of center pin 22 was located inside the center hole 28 of tail stock support 26 which was chucked into the tail stock, wherein the closed face 30 of the tail stock support 26 faced the base jig 8. The base jig 8 and tail stock support 26 were positioned about 5 cm apart. A wire guide 34 was used to prevent the wires from crossing. The base jig 8 was positioned so that the wire feed holes 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 were oriented vertically above the center pin 22 and the wires were positioned on the trailing side of the center pin 22. The wires were wrapped twice around the center pin 22 and left to hang parallel to the wire feed holes.
The petal jig hole 36 was rotated 720°. The petal jig 38 was inserted into the petal jig hole 36. Without crossing the wires, the wires were wrapped counter clockwise around the petal jig 38 past the tear drop pin 39 and around the circumference of the tear drop pin 39. The wires were wrapped around the outer circumference of the petal jig 38 to bring the wire between the petal jig 38 and the center pin 22. They were then wrapped around the center pin 22 twice.
The wires were placed under anchor plate 11. The anchor plate 11 was secured with Allen head screws 14. The wires were cut on the weight 20 side of the anchor plate 11.
With the weights 20, the tail stock support 26, and the wire guide 34 removed, the assembly was placed in a convection oven set to 475° C. for 14 minutes. The assembly was removed from the oven and quenched in water. The jigs were disassembled and the article was removed.
The wire ends were trimmed to the eyelets and the petals were fanned in the same direction as the helical winding, such that each petal was oriented 72° relative to the adjacent petal.
The article was powder coated with FEP powder (obtained from in house stock) in the following manner. A 2 mm outer diameter steel hollow mandrel was obtained of sufficient length to hold the article and have remaining length to extend into the commercial blender. The mandrel was inserted into the center hole of the article. One end the mandrel was grounded. A commercial blender (Variable Speed Lab Blender, Waring, Torrington, Conn.) was obtained and a quantity of FEP powder was added, leaving the tip of the blender blades exposed. The article and mandrel were suspended in the center of the blender, the lid was replaced, and the blender was turned on to the highest setting for about 5 seconds. The article and mandrel were removed, the mandrel was tapped to achieve a more uniform powder coating, the powder coating was vacuumed from the madrel and the article and mandrel were then hung inside a convection oven set to 320° C. for 3 minutes. The article and mandrel were removed from the oven, allowed to cool, and excess FEP was removed from the article, the mandrel was removed.
In a separate process a lock loop 43 (illustrated in
A crimped mandrel 41 (shown in
Next, a porous ePTFE film having the following properties was obtained:
Methanol bubble point of 0.7 psi
Mass/area of 2.43 grams/square meter
Longitudinal matrix tensile strength of 96000 psi
Matrix tensile strength in the orthogonal direction of 1433 psi
Longitudinal maximum load of 1.6 kg/inch
Thickness of 0.00889 mm
Methanol bubble point is measured using a custom built machine with a 1 inch diameter foot, a ramp rate of 0.2 psi/second and a liquid media of methanol. Length and width of the material are measured using a metal ruler. Mass/area is measured using a balance (Model GF-400 Top Loader Balance, ANG, San Jose, Calif.) with a 36×5 inch sample. Longitudinal maximum load is measured using a materials test machine (Model 5564, Instron, Grove City, Pa.) equipped with a 10 kg load cell. The gauge length is 2.54 cm and the cross head speed is 25 mm/minute. Sample width is 2.54 cm. Longitudinal tensile test measurements are taken in the length direction of the material. Thickness is measured using a thickness gauge (Mitutoyo Digital Indicator 547-400) with a foot diameter of ¼ inch. The longitudinal matrix tensile strengths (MTS) are calculated using the following equation: Density is calculated using the formula, density=mass/volume as described in a previous example.
A 30 mm film tube is constructed from the ePTFE material in the following manner. For a 25 mm diameter device, a film with a slit width of about 1.905 cm is wound on a 30 mm OD mandrel. The amount of film overlap is not critical but no overlap of the edges is unacceptable. The film tube is then removed from the mandrel and stretched to make the ID of the tube to be about 25 mm. The film tube was slipped over the tensioned article and using ePTFE film, the ends of the tube were cinched around the center of the device then the eyelets.
Another porous ePTFE film, having a layer of FEP, was obtained having the following properties:
Mass/area of 36.1 grams/square meter
Maximum Load, Longitudinal of 12.6 kg/inch
Maximum Load, Transverse of 0.3 kg/inch
Thickness of 0.030 mm
Test methods for the above tests are described previously. The FEP thickness in the film is about 62.5%. FEP thickness (%) is calculated as ratio of the FEP thickness and the film thickness. The reported value represents the average measurements for five samples. FEP thickness and film thickness is measured from scanning electron microscope images of cross sections of the ePTFE/FEP laminate material in the following manner. The magnification is chosen to enable the viewing of the entire film thickness. Five lines perpendicular to the horizontal edge of the image are randomly drawn across the full thickness of the film. Thickness is determined by measuring the thickness of the FEP and the thickness of the film.
A 2 mm wide strip of this FEP-coated ePTFE film, with the FEP side down, was wrapped four times around the cinched portions and heated with a soldering iron to bond the film layers together.
The article and mandrel were placed inside a convection oven set to 320° C. for 3 minutes and then removed and allowed to cool. The excess ePTFE material was trimmed and the article removed from the mandrel.
An article was constructed in the same manner as example 1 with the following exceptions:
Instead of using petal jig 38, self centering petal jig 39 (
An additional article 32 shown in
In order to achieve nesting of the two intermediate articles, the distal eyelets and the proximal eyelets must be nested. Inner intermediate article was positioned at the end of a straight, circular mandrel. One eyelet of the outer intermediate article was positioned over an eyelet of the inner intermediate article and both intermediate articles were repositioned to the other end of the mandrel. The remaining eyelet of the outer intermediate article was positioned over the remaining eyelet of the inner intermediate article. They were arranged such that the overlapping wires were equally spaced (about 72° apart) thereby creating a frame. The frame was subsequently FEP coated and covered with an ePTFE bag in order to create the final article.
With the following exceptions, an article similar to that as described in example 1 was created: A similar jig 50 illustrated in
An additional article (
Prior to FEP coat, the inner and outer intermediate articles were nested using the following method:
In order to achieve nesting of the two intermediate articles, the distal eyelets and the proximal eyelets must be nested. Inner intermediate article was positioned at the end of a straight, circular mandrel. One eyelet of the outer intermediate article was positioned over an eyelet of the inner intermediate article and both intermediate articles were repositioned to the other end of the mandrel. The remaining eyelet of the outer intermediate article was positioned over the remaining eyelet of the inner intermediate article. They were arranged such that the overlapping wires were equally spaced (about 72° apart) thereby creating a frame. The frame was subsequently FEP coated and covered with an ePTFE bag in order to create the final article.
Wire was obtained as described in the previous examples. A lock loop base jig 60 (
The following embodiments teach a heat set for the device described in Example 7 prior to the application of the cover, hereinafter called the frame of Example 7.
The frame of Example 7 was placed over about a 2 mm mandrel. The mandrel 72 was crimped on both sides if the article in order to secure it from moving. The frame was then placed on the tubular cylinder 70 described in
The following embodiments teach an anchor means for the device described Example 10.
(a) An anchor component 80 as shown in
The article was powder coated with FEP powder as previously described. The frame 78 was covered as previously described, after which wires 82 were individually manipulated to protrude through the sealing member 106 as shown in
(b) In another embodiment, the anchor component 80 of Example 11 (a) was further modified as follows. Jig 90 and washer 92, as shown in
(c) In another embodiment, the anchor component 80 (shown in
An about 1 meter length of 10% platinum drawn filled nitinol wire (Fort Wayne Metals, Fort Wayne, Ind.) with a diameter of about 0.23 mm is obtained. The specific length of the wire is not measured, it is only necessary that the wire be long enough to complete the winding pattern as described in the following paragraph. The wire is obtained having been electropolished. Electropolishing nitinol wire imparts certain well known properties, such as spontaneously forming a titanium dioxide layer on the surface, selectively reducing the amount of nickel on the surface of the wire, and removing some of the stresses in the wire thus improving fatigue.
A base jig 8 as described in
The other end of center pin 22 is located inside the center hole 28 of tail stock support 26 which is chucked into the tail stock, wherein the closed face 30 of the tail stock support 26 faces the base jig 8. The base jig 8 and tail stock support 26 are positioned about 5 cm apart. A wire guide 34 is used to prevent the wires from crossing. The base jig 8 is positioned so that the wire feed holes 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 are oriented vertically above the center pin 22 and the wires are positioned on the trailing side of the center pin 22.
The petal jig hole 36 is rotated 720°. The petal jig 38 is inserted into the petal jig hole 36. Without crossing the wires, the wires are placed on top of the petal jig 38. The base jig 8 is rotated 360° to create the petals of the device. The base jig 8 is rotated another 720° with the wires placed on top of the center pin 22.
With the weights 20, the tail stock support 26, and the wire guide 34 removed, the assembly is placed in a convection oven set to 475° C. for 14 minutes. The assembly is removed from the oven and quenched in water. The jigs are disassembled and the article is removed. The wire ends are trimmed to the eyelets and the anchor loops are fanned in the same direction as the helical winding, such that each anchor loop is oriented 72° offset relative to the adjacent anchor loops. The anchor loops are crimped at the center by hand and heat set again as previously described.
(d) In another embodiment, anchor components are manufactured by clipping about 2 cm straight lengths of nitinol wire 71. A tape made from ePTFE film with a thin layer of FEP is wrapped 88 around the wires 71 and the wires of frame 78 and then heated to bond the wires together as shown in
A device as previously described in Example 10 with anchors as described in example 11(d) is manufactured by attaching the anchors at multiple locations along the wires of frame 78.
In addition to being directed to the teachings described above and claimed below, devices and/or methods having different combinations of the features described above and claimed below are contemplated. As such, the description is also directed to other devices and/or methods having any other possible combination of the dependent features claimed below.
Numerous characteristics and advantages have been set forth in the preceding description, including various alternatives together with details of the structure and function of the devices and/or methods. The disclosure is intended as illustrative only and as such is not intended to be exhaustive. It will be evident to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made, especially in matters of structure, materials, elements, components, shape, size and arrangement of parts including combinations within the principles of the invention, to the full extent indicated by the broad, general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. To the extent that these various modifications do not depart from the spirit and scope of the appended claims, they are intended to be encompassed therein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/165,673, filed Jun. 21, 2011, which is a Continuation in Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/498,586, filed Jul. 7, 2009, which claims priority to provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 61/219,120, filed Jun. 22, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
283653 | Paxson | Aug 1883 | A |
3294631 | Lorenz et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3324518 | Louderback | Jun 1967 | A |
3447533 | Spicer | Jun 1969 | A |
3739770 | Mori | Jun 1973 | A |
3784388 | King et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3824631 | Burstein et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3875648 | Bone | Apr 1975 | A |
3907675 | Chapurlat et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3924631 | Mancusi, Jr. | Dec 1975 | A |
3939849 | Baxter et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4006747 | Kronenthal et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4007743 | Blake | Feb 1977 | A |
4038365 | Patil et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4113912 | Okita | Sep 1978 | A |
4149327 | Hammer et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4193138 | Okita | Mar 1980 | A |
4425908 | Simon | Jan 1984 | A |
4525374 | Vaillamcourt | Jun 1985 | A |
4610674 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619246 | Molgaard et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4626245 | Weinstein | Dec 1986 | A |
4665918 | Garza et al. | May 1987 | A |
4693249 | Schenck et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4696300 | Anderson | Sep 1987 | A |
4710181 | Fuqua | Dec 1987 | A |
4710192 | Liotta et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4738666 | Fuqua | Apr 1988 | A |
4766898 | Hardy et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4796612 | Reese | Jan 1989 | A |
4832055 | Palestrant | May 1989 | A |
4836204 | Landymore et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4840623 | Quackenbush | Jun 1989 | A |
4902508 | Badylak et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4915107 | Rebuffat et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917089 | Sidens | Apr 1990 | A |
4917793 | Pitt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4921479 | Grayzel | May 1990 | A |
4956178 | Badylak et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5021059 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5037433 | Wilk et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041129 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041225 | Norman | Aug 1991 | A |
5049131 | Deuss | Sep 1991 | A |
5049275 | Gillberg-LaForce et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5078736 | Behl | Jan 1992 | A |
5090422 | Dahl et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5098440 | Hillstead | Mar 1992 | A |
5106913 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108420 | Marks | Apr 1992 | A |
5124109 | Drossbach | Jun 1992 | A |
5149327 | Oshiyama | Sep 1992 | A |
5152144 | Andrie | Oct 1992 | A |
5163131 | Row et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167363 | Adkinson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5167637 | Okada et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5176659 | Mancini | Jan 1993 | A |
5192301 | Kamiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5222974 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226879 | Ensminger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234458 | Metais | Aug 1993 | A |
5236440 | Hlavacek | Aug 1993 | A |
5245023 | Peoples et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5245080 | Aubard et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250430 | Peoples et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257637 | El Gazayerli | Nov 1993 | A |
5269809 | Hayhurst et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275826 | Badylak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282827 | Kensey et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284488 | Sideris | Feb 1994 | A |
5304184 | Hathaway et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312341 | Turi | May 1994 | A |
5312435 | Nash et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316262 | Koehler | May 1994 | A |
5320611 | Bonutti et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334217 | Das | Aug 1994 | A |
5342393 | Stack | Aug 1994 | A |
5350363 | Goode et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350399 | Erlebacher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354308 | Simon et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364356 | Hofling | Nov 1994 | A |
5397331 | Himpens et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411481 | Allen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413584 | Schulze | May 1995 | A |
5417699 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425744 | Fagan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433727 | Sideris | Jul 1995 | A |
5437288 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443727 | Gagnon | Aug 1995 | A |
5443972 | Kohama et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451235 | Lock | Sep 1995 | A |
5453099 | Lee et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5478353 | Yoon | Dec 1995 | A |
5480353 | Garza, Jr. | Jan 1996 | A |
5480424 | Cox | Jan 1996 | A |
5486193 | Bourne et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507811 | Koike et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5571169 | Plaia et al. | May 1996 | A |
5534432 | Peoples et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549959 | Compton | Aug 1996 | A |
5562632 | Davila et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562728 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575816 | Rudnick et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577299 | Thompson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578045 | Das | Nov 1996 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5601571 | Moss | Feb 1997 | A |
5603703 | Elsberry et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5618311 | Gryskiewicz | Apr 1997 | A |
5620461 | Muijs Van De Moer et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626599 | Bourne et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634936 | Linden et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649950 | Bourne et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649959 | Hannam et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662701 | Plaia et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5663063 | Peoples et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683411 | Kavteladze et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690674 | Diaz | Nov 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702421 | Schneidt | Dec 1997 | A |
5709707 | Lock et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713864 | Verkaart | Feb 1998 | A |
5713948 | Ulfacker | Feb 1998 | A |
5717259 | Schexnayder | Feb 1998 | A |
5720754 | Middleman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725552 | Kotula et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725553 | Moenning | Mar 1998 | A |
5733294 | Forber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733337 | Carr, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741297 | Simon | Apr 1998 | A |
5749880 | Banas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755762 | Bush | May 1998 | A |
5769882 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772641 | Wilson | Jun 1998 | A |
5776162 | Kleshinski | Jul 1998 | A |
5776183 | Kanesaka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782847 | Plaia et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782860 | Epstein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797960 | Stevens et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799384 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800436 | Lerch | Sep 1998 | A |
5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810884 | Kim | Sep 1998 | A |
5820594 | Fontirroche et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823956 | Roth et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829447 | Stevens et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835422 | Merritt | Nov 1998 | A |
5853420 | Chevillon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853422 | Huebsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855614 | Stevens et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861003 | Latson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865791 | Whayne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865844 | Plaia et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873905 | Plaia et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879366 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893856 | Jacob et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895411 | Irie | Apr 1999 | A |
5897955 | Drumheller | Apr 1999 | A |
5902287 | Martin | May 1999 | A |
5902319 | Daley | May 1999 | A |
5902745 | Butler et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904703 | Gilson | May 1999 | A |
5906639 | Rudnick et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919200 | Stambaugh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924424 | Stevens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925060 | Forber | Jul 1999 | A |
5928250 | Koike et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944691 | Querns et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944738 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955110 | Patel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957490 | Sinnhuber | Sep 1999 | A |
5957953 | DiPoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967490 | Pike | Oct 1999 | A |
5976174 | Ruiz | Nov 1999 | A |
5980505 | Wilson | Nov 1999 | A |
5989268 | Pugsley, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993475 | Lin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993844 | Abraham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997575 | Whitson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010517 | Baccaro | Jan 2000 | A |
6016846 | Knittel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019753 | Pagan | Feb 2000 | A |
6024756 | Huebsch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027519 | Stanford | Feb 2000 | A |
6030007 | Bassily et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6051007 | Hogendijk et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053939 | Okuda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056760 | Koike et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071998 | Muller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074401 | Gardiner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077281 | Das | Jun 2000 | A |
6077291 | Das | Jun 2000 | A |
6077880 | Castillo et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079414 | Roth | Jun 2000 | A |
6080182 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080183 | Tsugita et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096347 | Geddes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106913 | Scardino et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113609 | Adams | Sep 2000 | A |
6117159 | Huebsch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123715 | Amplatz | Sep 2000 | A |
6126686 | Badylak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132438 | Fleischman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143037 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152144 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165183 | Kuehn et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165204 | Levinson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168588 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171329 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174322 | Schneidt et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183443 | Kratoska et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183496 | Urbanski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187039 | Hiles et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190353 | Makower et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190357 | Ferrari et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197016 | Fourkas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199262 | Martin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206895 | Levinson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206907 | Marino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214029 | Thill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217590 | Levinson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221092 | Koike et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227139 | Nguyen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228097 | Levinson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231561 | Frazier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245080 | Levinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245537 | Williams et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258091 | Sevrain et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261309 | Urbanski | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265333 | Dzenis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270500 | Lerch | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6270515 | Linden et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277138 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277139 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287317 | Makower et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290674 | Roue et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290689 | Delaney et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299635 | Frantzen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306150 | Levinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306424 | Vyakarnam et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312443 | Stone | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312446 | Huebsch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315791 | Gingras et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316262 | Huisman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319263 | Levinson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322548 | Payne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328427 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328727 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334872 | Termin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342064 | Koike et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344048 | Chin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344049 | Levinson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346074 | Roth | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348041 | Klint | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352552 | Levinson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355052 | Neuss et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355852 | Bricker et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356782 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358238 | Sherry | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364853 | French et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368338 | Konya et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371904 | Sirimanne et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375625 | French et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375668 | Gifford et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375671 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379342 | Levinson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379363 | Herrington et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379368 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387104 | Pugsley, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398796 | Levinson | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6402772 | Amplatz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419669 | Frazier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426145 | Moroni | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436088 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440152 | Gainor et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443972 | Bosma et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450987 | Kramer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460749 | Levinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468303 | Amplatz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478773 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482224 | Michler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488706 | Solymar | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491714 | Bennett | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494846 | Margolis | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494888 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497709 | Heath | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506204 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6508828 | Akerfeldt et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514515 | Williams | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6548569 | Williams et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551303 | Tessel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551344 | Thill | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554849 | Jones et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585719 | Wang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589251 | Yee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596013 | Yang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599448 | Ehrhard, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610764 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623506 | McGuckin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623508 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623518 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626936 | Stinson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629901 | Huang | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652556 | Van Tassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666861 | Grabek | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669707 | Swanstrom et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669713 | Adams | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669722 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685707 | Roman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689589 | Huisman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712804 | Roue et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712836 | Berg et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726696 | Houser et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6755834 | Amis | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786915 | Akerfeldt et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6828357 | Martin et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6838493 | Williams et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855126 | Flinchbaugh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860895 | Akerfeldt et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6866669 | Buzzard et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867247 | Williams et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867248 | Martin et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867249 | Lee | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6921401 | Lerch et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921410 | Porter | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6939352 | Buzzard et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6994092 | van der Burg et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044134 | Khairkhahan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048738 | Wellisz et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7097653 | Freudenthal et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128073 | Van Der Burg et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7149587 | Wardle et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152605 | Khairkhahan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165552 | Deem et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7198631 | Kanner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207402 | Bjoerk | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223271 | Muramatsu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238188 | Nesper et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7335426 | Marton et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7361178 | Hearn et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381216 | Buzzard et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7431729 | Chanduszko | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452363 | Ortiz | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7481832 | Meridew et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7582104 | Corcoran et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597704 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7658748 | Marino et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678123 | Chanduszko et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704268 | Chanduszko | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735493 | van der Burg et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780700 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7842053 | Chanduszko et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7871419 | Devellian | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875052 | Kawaura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7887562 | Young et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905901 | Corcoran et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918872 | Mitelberg et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8034061 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062325 | Mitelberg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118833 | Seibold et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8257389 | Chanduszko et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277480 | Callaghan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308760 | Chanduszko | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8361110 | Chanduszko | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8480706 | Chanduszko et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8551135 | Kladakis et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8585714 | Weisel et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8753362 | Widomski et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764790 | Thommen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8764848 | Callaghan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814947 | Callaghan | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821528 | McGuckin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858576 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8956389 | Van Orden | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9005242 | Cahill | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9119607 | Amin | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138213 | Amin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149263 | Chanduszko | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9326759 | Chanduszko et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9381006 | Masters | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9451939 | Aurilia et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9468430 | Van Orden | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474517 | Amin et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9636094 | Aurilia et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9808230 | Brown et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9861346 | Callaghan | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9949728 | Cahill | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10368853 | Brown et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10485525 | Cahill | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10792025 | Masters | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10806437 | Masters et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10828019 | Goble et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20010010481 | Blanc et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014800 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025132 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034537 | Shaw | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034567 | Allen et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037129 | Thill | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037141 | Yee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039435 | Roue et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039436 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041914 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041915 | Roue et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044639 | Levinson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049492 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049551 | Tseng et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010481 | Jayaraman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019648 | Akerfeldt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022859 | Hogendijk | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022860 | Borillo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026208 | Roe et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029048 | Miller | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032459 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032462 | Houser et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034259 | Tada | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035374 | Borillo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020043307 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049457 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052572 | Franco et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058980 | Sass | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058989 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077555 | Schwartz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095174 | Tsugita et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095183 | Casset et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096183 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099389 | Michler et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099390 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099437 | Anson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103492 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107531 | Schreck et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111537 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111637 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111647 | Khairkhahan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120323 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128680 | Pavlovic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129819 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143292 | Flinchbaugh | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156475 | Lerch et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156499 | Konya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164729 | Skraly et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169377 | Khairkhahan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183786 | Girton | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183787 | Wahr et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183823 | Pappu | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198563 | Gainor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004533 | Dieck et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023266 | Welch et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028213 | Thill et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045893 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050665 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055455 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057156 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059640 | Marton et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065379 | Babbs et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100920 | Akin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030113868 | Flor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120337 | Van Tassel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130683 | Andreas et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139819 | Beer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149463 | Solymar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030150821 | Bates et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153901 | Herweck et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171774 | Freudenthal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187390 | Bates et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191495 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195530 | Thill | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195555 | Khairkhahan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204203 | Khairkhahan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225421 | Peavey et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225439 | Cook et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006330 | Fangrow | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044361 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044364 | DeVries et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040133236 | Chanduszko | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073242 | Chanduszko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093017 | Chanduszko | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098042 | Devellian | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116959 | McGuckin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127919 | Trout et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133230 | Carpenter et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143294 | Corcoran et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167566 | Beulke et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176799 | Chanduszko | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186510 | Weaver | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210301 | Obermiller | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220596 | Frazier et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220610 | Kreidler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230222 | van der Burg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234567 | Dawson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254594 | Alfaro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050025809 | Hasirci et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038470 | van der Burg et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043759 | Chanduszko | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055039 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065548 | Marino et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067523 | Zach et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070935 | Ortiz | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080476 | Gunderson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085843 | Opolski et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113868 | Devellian | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119690 | Mazzocchi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137692 | Haug et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137699 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182426 | Adams et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187564 | Jayaraman | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187568 | Klenk et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192626 | Widomski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192627 | Whisenant et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050267523 | Devellian et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267525 | Chanduszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267572 | Schoon et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273135 | Chanduszko et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288706 | Widomski et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288786 | Chanduszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020332 | Lashinksi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025790 | de Winter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030884 | Yeung | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052821 | Abbott et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106447 | Opolski | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109073 | Allison et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116710 | Corcoran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122646 | Corcoran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122647 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167494 | Suddaby | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206148 | Khairkhahan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217764 | Abbott | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224183 | Freudenthal | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235463 | Freudenthal | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241690 | Amplatz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265004 | Callaghan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271089 | Alejandro et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276839 | McGuckin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010851 | Chanduszko et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021758 | Ortiz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070066994 | Blaeser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088388 | Opolski et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096048 | Clerc | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112381 | Figulla et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118176 | Opolski et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129755 | Abbott et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156225 | George et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167980 | Figulla et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167981 | Opolski | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179474 | Cahill et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185529 | Coleman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191884 | Eskridge et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208350 | Gunderson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225760 | Moszner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233186 | Meng | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244517 | Callaghan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244518 | Callaghan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250081 | Cahill et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250115 | Opolski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265656 | Amplatz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276415 | Kladakis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282430 | Thommen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015633 | Abbott | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027528 | Jagger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058800 | Collins et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065149 | Thielen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077180 | Kladakis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086168 | Cahill et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091234 | Kladakis et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109073 | Lashinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119886 | Greenhalgh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119891 | Miles et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147111 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208214 | Sato et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208226 | Seibold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228218 | Chanduszko | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249562 | Cahill | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262518 | Freudenthal | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312666 | Ellingwood et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012559 | Chanduszko | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054912 | Heanue et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062841 | Amplatz | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062844 | Tekulve et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069885 | Rahdert et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076541 | Chin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088795 | Cahill | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118745 | Paul, Jr. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090204133 | Melzer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228038 | Amin | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090292310 | Chin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306706 | Osypka | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004679 | Osypka | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100121370 | Kariniemi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145382 | Chanduszko | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145385 | Surti et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160944 | Teoh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211046 | Adams et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234878 | Hruska et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234884 | Lafontaine et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234885 | Frazier et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100324538 | Van Orden | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324585 | Miles et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324652 | Aurilia et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040324 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054519 | Neuss | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087146 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110184439 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184456 | Grandfield et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110218479 | Rottenberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295298 | Moszner | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301630 | Hendriksen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029556 | Masters | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120071918 | Amin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116528 | Nguyen | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143242 | Masters | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150218 | Sandgren et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197292 | Chin-Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245623 | Kariniemi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120316597 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130041404 | Amin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130218202 | Masters | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231684 | Aurilia et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245666 | Larsen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130282054 | Osypka | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296925 | Chanduszko | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140039543 | Willems et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140142610 | Larsen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140194921 | Akpinar | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207185 | Goble et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140309684 | Al-Qbandi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343602 | Cox et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150005809 | Ayres et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150034452 | Boon et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039023 | De Canniere | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150066077 | Akpinar | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150148731 | McNamara et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150196288 | Van | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150296288 | Anastas | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160249899 | Cahill | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170007221 | Aurilia et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007222 | Van Orden | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170035435 | Amin et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170105711 | Masters | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170156843 | Clerc | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170215852 | Aurilia et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180092634 | Callaghan | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190261966 | Goble et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200121307 | Brown et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200163659 | Cahill | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1218379 | Jun 1999 | CN |
1247460 | Mar 2000 | CN |
2524710 | Dec 2002 | CN |
200963203 | Oct 2007 | CN |
200980690 | Nov 2007 | CN |
201082203 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101460102 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101460102 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101773418 | Jul 2010 | CN |
201905941 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102802539 | Nov 2012 | CN |
9413645 | Oct 1994 | DE |
9413649 | Oct 1994 | DE |
102006036649 | Oct 2007 | DE |
0362113 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0474887 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0839549 | May 1998 | EP |
1013227 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0861632 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1046375 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1222897 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2240125 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2340770 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2524653 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2524653 | Nov 2012 | EP |
3292825 | Mar 2018 | EP |
06-13686 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-013686 | Apr 1994 | JP |
10244611 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000505668 | May 2000 | JP |
2000300571 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2002-513308 | May 2002 | JP |
2004-512153 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004534390 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005521447 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005521818 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-261597 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006230800 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-526087 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-535986 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009-000497 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-512521 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009514624 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009160402 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2010-525896 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2012-519572 | Aug 2012 | JP |
20010040637 | May 2001 | KR |
2208400 | Jul 2003 | RU |
84711 | Jul 2009 | RU |
1377052 | Feb 1988 | SU |
WO1993019803 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9601591 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO-1996025179 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO-1996031157 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9640305 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9742878 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-1998007375 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-1998008462 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-1998016174 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-1998029026 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-1998051812 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-1999005977 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-1998018864 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-1999018862 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-1999018864 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-1999018870 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-1999018871 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-1999030640 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO1999039646 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO-1999066846 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0017435 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2000012012 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-2000027292 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-2000044428 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO2000051500 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0103783 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-2001008600 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-2001019256 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO2001017435 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-2001021247 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-2001028432 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-2001030268 | May 2001 | WO |
WO2001049185 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO2001072367 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-2001078596 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-2001093783 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-2002017809 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2002024106 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2002038051 | May 2002 | WO |
0305152 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-2003001893 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-2003024337 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-2003053493 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-2003059152 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO2003061481 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-2003063732 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2003077733 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2003082076 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2003103476 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2003103476 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2003103476 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004012603 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2004032993 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2004037333 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043266 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043508 | May 2004 | WO |
2004047649 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2004052213 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2004067092 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2004101019 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005006990 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005018728 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005027752 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005032335 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005034724 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005074813 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005092203 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2005110240 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO2005112779 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006036837 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006041612 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006062711 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006102213 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2007124862 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007140797 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008002983 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008125689 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008137603 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008153872 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2008156464 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2010142051 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011044486 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011153548 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012003317 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,031, Chanduszko et al., filed Jul. 2, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion; dated Jan. 4, 2012; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau Of); PCT/US2010/039354; 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion; dated Jan. 4, 2012; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau Of); PCT/US2010/039358; 7 pages. |
International Search Report; dated Sep. 15, 2010; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau Of); PCT/US2010/039354; 5 pages. |
International Search Report; dated Sep. 3, 2010; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau Of); PCT/US2010/039358; 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; dated Feb. 4, 2013; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau Of); PCT/US2012/063598; 11 pages. |
Chinese Search Report in Application No. 200980158768.9, dated Jun. 16, 2013, 4 pages. |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 03729663.9, dated Jul. 16, 2008 (5 Pages). |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 03731562.9, dated Jul. 18, 2008 (3 Pages). |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 03779297.5, dated Mar. 15, 2007 (6 Pages). |
European Examination Report, European Application No. 04781644.2, dated Aug. 23, 2007 (3 Pages). |
European Search Report, European Application No. 03729663.9, dated Feb. 20, 2008 (3 Pages). |
European Search Report, European Application No. 11007412.7, dated Jan. 19, 2012,5 pages. |
Filsoufi, F., et al., “Automated Distal Coronary Bypass with a Novel Magnetic Coupler (MVP system),” J. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 127(1), pp. 185-192. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/039354 dated Jan. 4, 2012, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/039358 dated Jan. 4, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/004307, dated Sep. 13, 2011, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/063598, dated May 13, 2014, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063598, dated Feb. 4, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US06/41255, dated Jun. 13, 2008 (6 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; dated Feb. 22, 2013; World Intellectual Property Organization (Wipo) (International Bureau Of): 15 pages. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU03/00759, filed Jun. 19, 2003. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/004307, dated Nov. 27, 2009, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/050785, dated Nov. 23, 2012, 6 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/17715, dated Mar. 24, 2004 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/32133, dated Apr. 22, 2004 (1 pg). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/39253, dated Apr. 19, 2004 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/029978, dated Jan. 26, 2005 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/015382, dated Oct. 6, 2005 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/34276, dated Oct. 9, 2007. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/009978, dated Jul. 13, 2006 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US97/17927, dated Feb. 10, 1998 (1 pg). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/006703, dated Jul. 25, 2005 1(3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/013705 dated Aug. 4, 2005 (4 pgs). |
Jackson et al., “55-nitinol-the alloy with a memory—its physical metallurgy, properties and applications,” NASA, pp. 24-25, 1972. |
Klima, U., “Magnetic Vascular Port in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting,” Circulation, 2004, 11-55-11-60. |
Meier and Lock, “Contemporary management of patent foramen ovale,” Circulation., Jan. 7, 2003;107(1):5-9. |
Parviainen, M. et al., “A New Biodegradable Stent for the Pancreaticojejunal Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenal Resection: In Vitro Examination and Pilot Experiences in Humans” Pancreas, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 14-21, 2000. |
Ramanathan, G., et al., “Experimental and Computational Methods for Shape Memory Alloys,” 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Jun. 2-5, 2002. |
Ruiz, et al., “The puncture technique: A new method for transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2001, vol. 53, pp. 369-372. |
Uchil, “Shape Memory Alloys—Characterization Techniques,” Pramana—Journal of Phvsics, 2002 vol. 58 (5)(6), pp. 1131-1139. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2015/034452, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 10 pages. |
Kimura, A., et al., “Effects of Neutron Irradiation on the Transformation Behavior in Ti—Ni Alloys,” Abstract, Proceedings of the Int'l Conf. on Mariensitic Transformations, 1992, pp. 935-940. |
European Search Report issued in 16193808.9, dated May 19, 2017, 9 pages. |
European Search Report from EP17192489.7, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 6 pages. |
Athanasion, “Coronary artery bypass with the use of a magnetic distal anastomotic device: surgical technique and preliminary experience,” Heart Surg Forum., 2004;7 (6):356-359. |
Bachthaler, M. et al., “Corrosion of Tungsten Coils After Peripheral Vascular Embolization Theraphy: Influence on Outcome and Tungsten Load”, Catherization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 62, pp. 380-384, 2004. |
European Search Report, European Application No. 12/150,504, dated Jul. 2, 2012, 5 pages. |
Falk, V., “Facilitated Endoscopic Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using a Magentic Coupling Device,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 126,(5), pp. 1575-1579. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US04/22643, dated Jan. 16, 2006, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US07/65526, dated Sep. 30, 2008, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US07/65541, dated Sep. 30, 2008, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US08/59429, dated Oct. 6, 2009, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/011980, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 22 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/011980, dated Sep. 9, 2014, 32 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/017129 dated May 14, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/59429, dated Sep. 5, 2008 (9 pgs). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU03/00759, dated Aug. 25, 2003, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/039354, dated Sep. 15, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/039358 dated Sep. 3, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US02/40850 dated Jun. 19, 2003 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/01050, dated Jul. 8, 2003 (1 pg). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/09051, dated Sep. 29, 2003 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/17390, dated Oct. 6, 2003 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/34003 dated Oct. 3, 2004 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/34003 dated Mar. 10, 2004 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/35479, dated Apr. 14, 2004 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/35479, Apr. 14, 2004 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/35998 dated Jun. 16, 2004 (5 pgs}. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/022643, dated Mar. 31, 2005 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/022643, dated Mar. 31, 2005 (5 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/026998, dated Apr. 22, 2005 (5 pgs}. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/026998, dated Apr. 22, 2005 (5 pqs}. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/006703, dated Jul. 25, 2005 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/34276, dated Oct. 4, 2007, 1 page. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US07/065546, dated Oct. 29, 2007. 2 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2007/065526, dated Aug. 8, 2007 (5 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2007/065526, dated Aug. 8, 2007 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2007/065541, dated Aug. 7, 2007 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2007/065541, dated Aug. 7, 2007 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US97/14822, dated Feb. 20, 1998 (2 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/USOS/006703, dated Jul. 25, 2005 1(3 pgs). |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/USOS/013705 dated Aug. 4, 2005 (4 pgs). |
Isotalo, T. et al., “Biocompatibility Testing of a New Bioabsorbable X-Ray Positive SR-PLA 96/4 Urethral Stent”, The Journal of Uroloav. vol. 163, pp. 1764-1767, Nov. 1999. |
Kilma, “Magnetic Vascular Port in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting,” Circulation, Sep. 14, 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II55-60. |
Meier and Lock, “Contemporary mangement of patent foramen ovale,” Circulation., Jan. 7, 2003;107(1):5-9. |
Nat'l Aeronautics and Space Administration, “55-Nitinol—The Alloy with a Memory: Its Physical Metallurgy, Properties, and Applications,” A Report, pp. 24-25. |
Ramanathan, G., et al., “Experimental and Computational Methods for Shape Memory Alloys,” 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Jun. 2-5, 2002, 12 pages. |
Ruddy, A. C. et al., “Rheological, Mechanical and Thermal Behaviour of Radipaque Filled Polymers”, Polymer Processing Research Centre, School of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University of Belfast, 5 pages. |
Schaffer and Gordon, “Engineering Characteristics of Drawn Filled Nitinol Tube” SMST-2003: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies (ASM International), pp. 109-118, 2004. |
Shabalovskaya, “Surface, corrosion and biocompatibility aspects of Nitinol as an implant material,” Biomed Mater Eng., 2002;12(1):69-109. |
SMST-2000, “Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies,” Apr. 30-May 4, 2000, Asilomar Conference Proceedings, 2001, pp. 531-541. |
Stein, H., “Telemanipulator-gestutzte Applikation eines magnetischen Gefass-Kopplers am schlagenden Herzen mit dem da Vinci'-Surgical-System,” Biomedizinische Technik, 2003, vol. 48(9), pp. 230-234. |
Stockel, “Nitinol Medical Devices and Implants,” Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol 9(2), Cordis Corporation—Nitino/Devices and Components, Fremont, CA, USA, 2000pp. 81-88. |
U.S. Appl. filed Jul. 2, 2013, Chanduszko et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,031. |
Vaajanen et al., “Expansion and fixation properties of a new braided biodegradable urethral stent: an experimental study in the rabbit,” The Journal of Urology, J Urol., Mar. 2003;169(3):1171-1174. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130218202 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61219120 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13165673 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13745671 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12498586 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13165673 | US |