The present invention relates to turbine nozzles of steam turbines and, more particularly, to sealing of steam turbine nozzle hook leakages using a braided rope seal.
Within a steam turbine, there are static nozzles (airfoils) that turn the flow into the buckets, which in turn extract work from the flow medium. In a reaction-style turbine design, these nozzles are assembled into an inner casing (shell). The nozzles are slid into a circumferential hook as individual or “ganged” nozzle segments. A leakage circuit exists around the nozzle to stator hook. This leakage bypasses the nozzle, and therefore the flow is not “turned” or accelerated through the nozzle throat. Both losses result in reduced stage efficiency and unaccounted for leakage to the system. Depending upon the machine intolerances, surface finish and nozzle loading, this leakage may be highly variable.
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a steam turbine includes a stator supporting a plurality of turbine nozzles. The stator has shaped grooves for receiving a complementary-shaped nozzle hook formed on an end of each of the turbine nozzles. A rope seal is disposed in each interface between the nozzle hooks and the shaped grooves, respectively.
In another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a method of constructing a steam turbine is provided, where the steam turbine includes a plurality of nozzles with nozzle hooks and a stator with grooves shaped corresponding to the nozzle hooks. The method comprises the steps of inserting a rope seal in each of the stator grooves; and securing the nozzles in the stator grooves, respectively, via the nozzle hooks, whereby the rope seal is disposed in each interface between the nozzle hooks and the grooves.
In still another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a stator assembly for a steam turbine includes a plurality of shaped grooves for receiving a corresponding plurality of turbine nozzles via complementary-shaped nozzle hooks formed on an end of each of the turbine nozzles. The rope seal is disposed in each interface between the nozzle hooks and the shaped grooves, respectively.
In steam turbine design, it is important to seal up as many leakage paths as possible within the turbine secondary (leakage) flow circuits. Each stage of a steam turbine consists of a rotor and bucket stage following a stage of nozzles (airfoils). In one turbine design, the stator nozzles (airfoils) are slid into circumferential hooks (grooves) in an inner or outer turbine casing (shell). Between these nozzles, where they enter the shell, is a slashface (end face) that is typically angled with respect to the engine axis, typically to accommodate the sweeping airfoil turning shape. A leakage path exists over the stator hooks between the nozzle and the turbine shell (stator structural unit). This leakage is caused by higher pressure steam in the forward cavity (upstream cavity). There is a pressure drop across the nozzle that causes this pressure differential. This leakage, if not accounted for, will cause increased efficiency losses. Such hooks typically exist in the high pressure (HP) and intermediate pressure (IP) steam turbine sections. This turbine design is typically based on impulse theory versus reaction theory, and the typical design has the airfoils welded into a diaphragm ring assembly.
By the present invention, it has been discovered that a rope seal 10 such as a braided rope seal can be placed at an interface between the static nozzle segment aft (downstream) hook 14 and an axial load surface 16 of a groove 18 in the stator casing 20 for the purpose of reducing leakage flow across the interface. See FIG. 2. The seal 10 results in an efficiency increase of the stage, adding up to an increase in total machine performance. The seal 10 is preferably suited for reaction turbine designs.
With continued reference to
Preferably, the braided rope seal 10 is formed of a braided metal sheathing surrounding a composite matrix such as ceramic. This gives the seal 10 flexibility and high temperature resistance while being able to retain some resiliency. The typical rope seal preferably has between 1/16th - 3/16th inch diameter.
In constructing the stator assembly, the rope seal 10 is inserted in the stator groove 18, and the nozzles 12 are secured in one-by-one around the stator circumference. The pressure differential across the nozzle stage would cause the rope seal 10 to deform into the gap between the nozzle hook 14 and the stator groove 18. As a result, the “over-the-hook” leakage is significantly reduced at this location. Preferably, the rope seal 10 is formed of a material such that once the seal has been put through at least one engine operating cycle, the seal should deform sufficiently into the gap and “permanently” stay in place. It has been shown through bench testing that this type of seal is much better at sealing leakages between components than existing metal-to-metal contact.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3394919 | Catterfeld | Jul 1968 | A |
4022545 | Shank | May 1977 | A |
4725200 | Welhoelter | Feb 1988 | A |
5129783 | Hayton | Jul 1992 | A |
5358262 | Roberts | Oct 1994 | A |
5605438 | Burdgick et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5630700 | Olsen et al. | May 1997 | A |
6039325 | Steinetz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6126389 | Burdgick | Oct 2000 | A |
6164656 | Frost | Dec 2000 | A |
6190120 | Thatcher et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6331096 | Burdgick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343911 | Burdgick | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375415 | Burdgick | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375429 | Halila et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386825 | Burdgick | May 2002 | B1 |
6390769 | Burdgick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398489 | Burdgick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402466 | Burdgick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413040 | Yu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418618 | Burdgick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419445 | Burdgick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422810 | Burdgick et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435814 | Yu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446979 | Steinetz et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453557 | Burdgick | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464453 | Toborg et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6464456 | Darolia et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040115046 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |