The invention is suitable in particular for use in opposed piston engines, whose control slits or channels for feeding and discharging the working gas are arranged in the region of the upper piston dead centres. It is known (DE-A-1906542) to control the gas exchange in internal combustion engines by means of sliding sleeves. It is also known (DE202005021624U1 and DE202006020546U1) to avoid a slit overrunning of the pistons in opposed piston engines by means of such sliding sleeves controlling the gas exchange. In this connection arbitrary control times can be achieved in the two-stroke method as well as in the four-stroke methods. Particularly critical in this connection however is a reliable sealing of the sliding sleeves against the gas feed and discharge channels controlled by them, since especially with diesel engines high pressures can occur during the compression and expansion of the working gas.
The known cylinder sealing system for laterally moved pistons by means of piston rings forming a seal against the gas pressure cannot be implemented for spatial reasons however for sliding sleeves. Instead, either an implementation similar to that of a valve can be used, i.e. the sliding sleeve has a cone-shaped sealing seat on its edge controlling the channel opening, or it closes the channel openings by covering them, as in the case of slide valve controls. It is also known from the aforementioned inventions (DE202005021624U1 and DE202006020546U1) to use both sealing methods simultaneously.
The overrunning of the openings by the control edge of the sliding sleeve has the disadvantage that it does not adequately seal them against higher pressures, since the sliding sleeve requires a minimum play in order to ensure its mobility. In addition the covering stretch must be kept short in order to avoid large strokes of the sliding sleeves as well as friction. Due to the inevitably remaining gap a large amount of gas can escape, particularly at low rotational speeds.
The implementation of a sealing front side of a sliding sleeve in the manner of a valve seat with a constant uniform internal diameter differs in its function from conventional valves in that the gas pressure cannot exert a closing force on the sealing surface. On the contrary, if the sealing is not tight over the whole surface, gas that is under pressure can escape into the gap that is formed and thereby enlarge the latter, whereby the sliding sleeve can be subjected to pressure or would at least become less hermetic.
The object of the invention is accordingly to utilise the gas pressure by structural measures as an auxiliary force to keep the sliding sleeves closed.
This is achieved according to the invention by a pressure stage in the internal diameter of the sliding sleeve in the region of the sealing front surface, i.e. the outer sealing diameter is smaller than the pressure-active internal diameter of the sliding sleeve. As a result of this arrangement the sleeve-closing forces are larger than those acting to open the sleeve. Since the sealing seat with the pressure stage is located in the region of the piston top land, when the piston is at the upper dead centre the piston diameter in this region must be smaller than the internal diameter of the sealing seat in order to avoid collision. For practical reasons the sealing seat located in the cylinder can be designed so as to be replaceable. As in conventional valve seats, a highly suitable material can be used for this purpose.
Comparable to the case of conventional bi-metallic valves with different valve shaft and valve disc materials, a more suitable material different from the basic material can be used in the sealing region of the control sleeve. Whereas a conventional cylinder sleeve material with good sliding properties is conveniently used in the sliding part and is coated in the region of the pistons and piston rings, the sliding sleeve in the region of its sealing surface can be made of a high strength and thermally resistant material. As with conventional valves the various materials can be joined by friction welding, electron beam welding or other suitable joining methods. The advantage of this implementation with different materials is a higher strength and thermal loadability.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2009 017 640.1 | Nov 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP10/67578 | 11/16/2010 | WO | 00 | 8/2/2012 |