The present invention relates to rain gutter and downspout systems, and in particular to such systems with principal components formed of flat, seamless material that may be distributed on a spool and cut to a desired length.
Rain gutter and downspout systems are widely employed on commercial and residential buildings to direct rainfall to a desired location, thereby preventing erosion and the other deleterious effects of uncontrolled water run-off from building roofs. The U.S. market for rain guttering systems is large, exceeding one billion dollars annually. Those rain gutter systems on the market today fall into one of three major classes: vinyl sectional, metal sectional, and seamless metal. A fourth method, currently only used to a very small extent in Canada, is fused (or “virtually seamless”) vinyl.
Vinyl sectional rain gutter systems are constructed from pre-formed sections of U-shaped plastic material, usually ten feet in length. Because no expensive, customized equipment is necessary for the installation of sectional vinyl pieces, this class of rain gutter systems is the preferred choice of do-it-yourself installers. Sectional systems, however, are time-consuming to install, as connectors are required at each point where the pre-formed sections are fitted together. These connectors are prone to leak or otherwise fail after the system has been in place for some time. The connectors also increase the cost of this type of guttering system. One connector costs approximately two-thirds as much as a ten-foot gutter section. The connectors must be designed to allow for the high degree of expansion and contraction that occurs in the vinyl material due to changes in temperature. Another important disadvantage of this type of system is that the connectors ruin the smooth, uninterrupted appearance of the gutters, and thus may negatively impact the appearance of the home or other building upon which the gutters are installed. Appearance is known to be an important factor in the selection of a guttering system, particularly with respect to homes and retail business establishments.
Another factor adding to the cost of sectional vinyl gutter systems is the required hangers and downspouts. In order to prevent sagging, vinyl sectional guttering systems require hangers to be installed from the building at approximately two-foot intervals along each gutter section. The price of hangers for a typical installation project will be more than double the price of the ten-foot gutter sections themselves. The increased cost is a result of forming the connectors and hangers from the more expensive injection-molding technique required. Extruded plastic is much less expensive than injection-molded plastic. The downspouts for such systems are pre-formed into rectangular tubes, generally ten feet in length, and each such length is generally priced at one and one-half to two times the price of a ten-foot, U-shaped gutter section. It may thus be seen that much of the cost of this type of guttering system is hidden in the auxiliary components necessary for the installation of the complete system.
Metal sectional rain gutter systems are, like the vinyl sectional systems, constructed of pre-form U-shaped sections, again generally of ten-foot lengths. The sections in most metal gutter systems are constructed from aluminum, due to its low cost, relatively light weight, and resistance to corrosion. Copper and stainless steel sections are other options, but due to the prohibitively high cost of these materials they are seldom used. Like the vinyl sectional systems, the metal sectional systems also suffer from a number of disadvantages. Aluminum is easily bent, and once a bend occurs it is difficult or impossible to fully restore without the damage being visible. Each of the aluminum guttering system components must be painted for purposes of appearance, and any chip or nick in the paint will be highly visible. The installation of such a system is time-consuming due to the necessary use of connectors, which, as in the case of vinyl sectional systems, significantly drive up the cost of these systems. Also as with the vinyl sectional systems, the connectors ruin the clean, neat appearance of the guttering system.
Metal seamless, or continuous, guttering systems are formed on-site from flat sheets of metal. The flat metal, typically aluminum, is pulled from a spool or roll, cut to the appropriate length, and then bent or formed into the proper U-like shape by the use of a special forming machine. The downspouts of this type of system are typically pre-formed into a rectangular cross-sectional shape. Because the gutters are cut to the desired length on-site, this type of system require no connectors along the length of the building roofline, and thus provide the neat appearance that sectional gutter systems lack. For this reason, metal seamless guttering is by far the most popular choice for home guttering in the United States. This class of guttering system is, however, far more expensive than sectional guttering because of the requirement of a professional installation crew and forming machine on-site. The forming machine necessary to install metal seamless guttering costs an estimated $12,000 to $20,000, placing it well out of reach of typical do-it-yourself installers. The machine also requires special training for proper and safe use, thus discouraging a rental market for the forming machines. Like sectional metal guttering systems, the components of this system are highly susceptible to bending and chipping of paint.
A newer product on the market is fused vinyl, or “virtually seamless” vinyl guttering. This product is sold exclusively to gutter installation specialists and is currently available only in Canada. Using this system, the vinyl sections are fused together on-site by means of a fusing machine operated by the gutter installation crew. The beaded seam is then trimmed or sanded. Although the seam is thus still visible, it is not as glaringly visible as the connectors of traditional sectional guttering. Like seamless metal guttering, this type of guttering system is expensive, and not available for do-it-yourself installers. The machine used to fuse the guttering material costs an estimated $6,000 to $10,000, and, like the forming machine used for metal seamless gutters, is not safe for use by untrained do-it-yourselfers. Although this machine has a lower cost than that of the forming machine used for seamless metal guttering, the installation process for fused vinyl takes roughly twice as long, which drives up labor costs associated with installation. The hangers used for this type of guttering system, like the hangers used for vinyl sectional guttering, require injection molding, and are required at about every two feet of guttering length.
It may be seen that each of the existing classes of guttering systems suffer from important disadvantages. What is desired then is a guttering system that provides the neat appearance of seamless guttering but that does not require specialized equipment to form the guttering pieces from a flat roll on site. In particular, such a guttering system would be highly desirable if such system were safe and otherwise appropriate for installation by do-it-yourself homeowners.
The prior art does contain an attempt to develop a seamless plastic material for a gutter-related application. U.S. Pat. No. 6,308,464 to Demartini teaches a downspout for use with a rain gutter that is formed from a flat plastic sheet disposed on a roll prior to construction. The necessary downspout length is cut from the roll, then the sheet is bent into the desired shape, which may be either a rectangular or oval cross-sectional configuration. Bending is facilitated in the rectangular configuration by longitudinal regions in the plastic sheet that comprise a more flexible plastic material than the material used to form the bulk of the sheet. Alternatively, the plastic material forming the sheet may be made thinner where the bends are to occur so that the material will be more flexible at these locations.
While Demartini '464 teaches a downspout system formed using a plastic material that may be cut to a desired length, the system falls far short of a complete seamless guttering system, or even a gutter itself. Neither the rectangular nor oval configuration used for the downspout of Demartini '464 could be used for gutters, since the rainwater would have no means of entering the gutter when deployed. No system for connecting the pieces of such a system are taught by Demartini '464, since, due to the fact that Demartini '464 is limited to the use of a downspout for an existing gutter system, no such connectors are required. In addition, Demartini's downspout has no mechanism to lock and hold the rectangular or oval shape along its length. This will allow the downspout to twist and bulge out of shape between points of anchorage to the wall of the building. Also, without locking mechanisms the downspout material will be wavy after being wound on a spool. What is desired then is a complete guttering system that is formed of a continuous flexible sheet, providing the advantages of such a system that are described herein.
The present invention is directed to a seamless gutter system that is formed of flat plastic material. The flat material is thinned along longitudinal strips in the plastic sheet, thereby allowing the material to be folded once it is cut to length. The folding system results in a generally U-shaped configuration for the gutter produced by this method. Optionally, a leaf guard may be placed onto the gutter, the leaf guard being formed from another plastic sheet, which may similarly be provided in a roll and cut to length. Tabs that are preferably integrally molded into the flat plastic material hold the “U” shape of the gutter, so that no reinforcement is required. A downspout may be formed of the same material as the gutter, with a downspout “top cap” closing the three sides of the U-shaped gutter to create a closed downspout piece. Corner connectors and optional hangers complete the system, all of which may be formed of vinyl or other plastic material for durability, ease of installation, and low cost.
It may be seen that such a system results in a guttering system that provides a neat, uninterrupted appearance similar to that of metal seamless guttering. The present invention, however, provides this neat appearance at a much lower cost, since no specialized forming machine is required at the job site. The need for trained forming machine operators is thus eliminated also, making the present invention ideally suited for do-it-yourself installation, as well as installation by professional gutter contractors. The rolls of material and other components of the system could preferably be available for purchase at a retail outlet, such as a home-improvement store, whereby the homeowner would need only to bring his or her home measurements to the store in order to purchase the necessary lengths of material and related components. In addition, it may be seen that the present invention would be desirable by building contractors as well; contractors currently must hire or train gutter installation specialists in order to install seamless metal guttering, but by employing the present invention could use their own general construction labor for the installation process, thereby lowering the costs associated with each project involving a gutter installation. In addition, independent gutter installation contractors can install seamless gutters without the requirement of an expensive bending or forming machine.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide for a seamless guttering system formed of a plastic or other flexible material.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide for a guttering system that is inexpensive to purchase and install.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide for a guttering system that may be installed by a do-it-yourself homeowner or other untrained person or persons.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide for seamless guttering without the requirement of an expensive bending or forming machine.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a seamless gutter, which combined with a seamless top cap that can be snapped onto the gutter, can be converted into a seamless downspout.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide for a guttering system that has a clean, attractive appearance.
These and other features, objects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood from a consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and appended claims in conjunction with the drawings as described following:
With reference to
In the preferred embodiment, spaces, slits, or gaps (not shown in
While in the preferred embodiment the thickness of the wall of gutter section 10 is uniform, as shown in
Referring now to
In the preferred embodiment, hanger section 22 is mounted to the eave or otherwise just below the roof line of the building upon which the preferred embodiment is to be installed. This mounting may be by screws, staples, or other means. Holes (not shown) may optionally be periodically placed along the length of hanger section 22 for this purpose.
Gutter sections 10 and matching hanger sections 22 are cut to length for use based on the length of each section needed for the particular application. A homeowner, builder, or contractor could thus measure the dimensions of the roof perimeter of the home for which guttering is desired, and bring those measurements to a home improvement store or other vendor that makes available the preferred embodiment for purchase. The gutter section 10 material is preferably kept on a roll or spool, and can thus be unwound and cut to the length indicated by the customer's dimensions. In this way, no connectors are needed during long runs of the guttering material along straight roofing lines, thereby presenting a neat appearance and avoiding the cost of purchasing connectors for this purpose.
In alternative embodiments, hanger sections 22 may be omitted from the system as described above, and gutter sections 22 may be connected directly to the building eaves or otherwise just below the roof line. Holes (not shown in
Referring now to
In one set of alternative embodiments, screen 28 of leaf guard section 26 may be replaced with solid section 32 as depicted in
A corner connector 36 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is depicted in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Once flange 46 is in place, expanding/flexing downspout connector edge 51 is fitted over flange 46 from the bottom side of gutter section 10, locking in place due to the friction between the parts. In alternative embodiments, scaling or tabs may be used on one or both of flange 46 and expanding/flexing downspout connector edge 51 to improve the shear strength of the friction fit between the parts. In other alternative embodiments, various connectors as are known in the art, such as screws and expanding brads, may be used to securely connect the parts. Expanding downspout connector 50 is designed to move laterally and longitudinally in accordion-like fashion in order to allow for the expansion and contraction of the guttering system components due to changes in temperature during the year. The expanding/flexing downspout connector 50 allows for vertical (longitudinal) expansion of the downspout, while at the same time allows flexing of the connector to compensate for the longitudinal movement of the gutter along the hanger as it contracts and expands, while the downspout is held in a fixed position against the side of the building. The downspout connector edge 49 can be glued to the edge of the downspout itself. Alternatively, the connector edge 49 can be configured as a slot or groove, and the downspout edge will act as a tongue, in a tongue-and-groove type connection.
It may be noted that certain components of the invention are generally described herein as having a “U” shape when deployed. As used herein, this means that the sides are generally raised with respect to the bottom to form a shape that is at least somewhat reminiscent of a letter “U.” In the case of gutter section 10 of the preferred embodiment, for example, this shape is desired because water is held and directed within the trough-like bottom portion of the “U,” thereby functioning to catch and direct water to the desired location. This does not necessarily mean, however, that the sides of the component described as having a “U” shape are strictly perpendicular to the bottom of that component, or that the sides or bottom are necessarily flat or straight.
The material used in the construction of the preferred embodiment is vinyl. It may be noted, however, that other plastic materials may be used in alternative embodiments. Such materials may include, for example, polypropylene, or various laminates or cored materials that include plastic materials and non-plastic materials. In addition, the present invention, with relatively minor modifications, can be formed from relatively soft metals, such as aluminum or copper. The principal difference other than the material used in this embodiment is that a specially shaped cork or other cushioning material would preferably be wound on the spool or coil along with the metal. The purpose of the cushioning material is to keep the layers of metal from bearing on and bending the various tabs and channels of the gutter, hanger, leaf guard cap, and downspout conversion cap.
It may be noted that in an embodiment of the invention where plastic materials are used, the hanger, leaf guard cap, and downspout conversion cap parts are preferably formed of extruded plastic in order to limit costs. The corner connector should preferably be vacuum molded or injection molded for strength. Likewise, the downspout flange should be injected molded, and the expanding downspout connector is preferably blow molded. Each of these molding techniques are known in the art.
The present invention has been described with reference to certain preferred and alternative embodiments that are intended to be exemplary only and not limiting to the full scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2988226 | Campbell | Jun 1961 | A |
3057117 | Singer | Oct 1962 | A |
3076669 | Schlein | Feb 1963 | A |
3550381 | South | Dec 1970 | A |
3741398 | Abramson | Jun 1973 | A |
3825288 | Maroschak | Jul 1974 | A |
3913284 | Hall | Oct 1975 | A |
4134002 | Stanford | Jan 1979 | A |
4195452 | Smith et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4305236 | Williams | Dec 1981 | A |
4446658 | Gouin | May 1984 | A |
4473973 | Lane | Oct 1984 | A |
4553356 | Pepper | Nov 1985 | A |
4619554 | Walker et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4622785 | Miller | Nov 1986 | A |
4631875 | Olson | Dec 1986 | A |
4632342 | Skinner | Dec 1986 | A |
4650224 | Smith | Mar 1987 | A |
4727689 | Bosler | Mar 1988 | A |
4765101 | Wolf | Aug 1988 | A |
4858396 | Rose et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4912888 | Martin | Apr 1990 | A |
4953735 | Tisbo et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4953897 | Klober | Sep 1990 | A |
5007146 | Meidan | Apr 1991 | A |
5016404 | Briggs | May 1991 | A |
5181793 | Dekel | Jan 1993 | A |
5216852 | Bemis et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5311753 | Kanao | May 1994 | A |
5327689 | Jansen | Jul 1994 | A |
5375891 | Sicotte et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394656 | Parker | Mar 1995 | A |
5404686 | Esposito | Apr 1995 | A |
5406756 | Bemis et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5511829 | Sicotte et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5551201 | Anderson | Sep 1996 | A |
5570860 | Schoenherr | Nov 1996 | A |
5611175 | Sweers | Mar 1997 | A |
5634299 | Gaston | Jun 1997 | A |
5638643 | Demartini et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5678360 | Fort et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5752347 | Osborn | May 1998 | A |
5794315 | Crabtree et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5813701 | Noble | Sep 1998 | A |
5867943 | Thomas | Feb 1999 | A |
5915735 | Noble | Jun 1999 | A |
5960591 | Schluter | Oct 1999 | A |
6041825 | Smith et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6125593 | Randolph et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6223777 | Smith et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6308464 | Demartini | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6497816 | Naddy | Dec 2002 | B2 |