Network browser interfaces currently permit users to view locators for web pages. Some interfaces display universal resource locators (URLs) for a user's favorite web pages in a graphical user interface, for instance. And some interfaces display URLs for web pages that a user has visited. These interfaces may also show URLs for web pages found in searching a user's favorites or history. But these interfaces can make poor use of a user's display area, confuse users, or be difficult for users to navigate. Some interfaces, for example, present web-page histories in cascading drop-down menus, which can be hard for some users to navigate, especially those that cannot use a mouse well.
System(s) and/or method(s) (“tools”) are described that present indicia for implicitly and explicitly user-associated web pages of a network browser application. The tools can present these indicia in a single graphic user interface, in response to a user's selection of a single unified access point, or in response to a search of the browser's user-associated web pages.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
Overview
The following document describes tools that present indicia for implicitly and explicitly user-associated web pages of a network browser application. In one embodiment, the tools present these indicia in a single graphic user interface that floats or docks with the browser's user interface. In other embodiments, the indicia are presented in response to a user's selection of a single unified access point, opening the browser, or a search of the browser's user-associated web pages.
Exemplary Operating Environment
Before describing the tools in detail, the following discussion of an exemplary operating environment is provided to assist the reader in understanding where and how the tools may be employed. The description provided below constitutes but one example and is not intended to limit application of the tools to any one particular operating environment
The communication network enables communication between the computer and the network computer and may comprise one or more of an intranet, such as a company's internal network, the Internet, and the like.
Exemplary User Interfaces
The following discussion describes exemplary user interfaces and a related process for presenting indicia of user-associated web pages. The process is shown at 200 in
Block 202 presents a single unified access point enabling a user to gain access to indicia for explicitly and implicitly user-associated web pages. The access point may comprise an icon, graphic, or selectable text. The user may select the access point with a single user action.
Block 204 receives a user's selection to present a user interface enabling access to indicia for explicitly and implicitly user-associated web pages. Block 204 can receive this selection through a user clicking on access point 302 shown in
Block 206 presents a user interface enabling access to indicia for explicitly and implicitly user-associated web pages. This user interface can comprise a single navigable graphic user interface through which the indicia may be viewed and/or selected. It can be a window docked within a network browser's interface or be a floating entity, for instance. The indicia may be selected by the way in which the web pages are associated with a user, such as those explicitly associated with a user by the user marking the web pages as favorites, explicitly associated with a user by the user marking the web pages as feeds, and implicitly associated with a user by the user viewing the web pages thereby enabling a history of viewed web pages.
Block 208 receives selection to view indicia for one or more explicitly and/or implicitly user-associated web pages. Here block 208 receives a user's selection of favorites control 404 shown in
Block 210 determines an order or hierarchy in which indicia will be displayed. Block 210 can order indicia for explicitly user-associated web pages alphabetically, chronologically, or following a user-selected order. Block 210 can set an order or hierarchy for indicia of implicitly user-associated web pages following various algorithms. One of these algorithms orders indicia with a weighted combination of when web pages were viewed and how often they were viewed, such as ordering indicia for pages visited most often in the last three weeks.
Block 212 presents indicia for explicitly and/or implicitly user-associated web pages in a graphic user interface. The graphic user interface can comprise one or multiple windows or regions. The indicia may be presented automatically (e.g., when a network browser is opened), responsive to selection by a user of a single unified access point, or responsive to a selection to view indicia for one or more types of user-associated web pages. Thus, block 212 may act independent of or responsive to blocks 204 and 208.
Here user interface module 114 presents indicia for favorites 500 responsive to a user selecting favorites control 404 in
Favorites indicia 500 are presented in a navigable hierarchy, the hierarchy defined by a user (though it may also be defined by user interface module 114). Here one favorite web page (entitled “MSN.com”) is indicated with two indicia, a graphic at 506 and text at 508. The graphic or text may be user-defined, web-page defined, or defined by user interface module 114. Two other indicia are oriented subservient to “MSN.com”. These other indicia are web pages that are related to and more specific than the parent “MSN.com.” Indicia for these web pages have text, here descriptive titles, which are shown at 510 and 512. Similarly, indicia for other favorite web pages is also presented, here “CNET.com” at 514 and 516, “Geek.com” at 518 and 520, “eBay.com” at 522 and 524, “Ofoto.com” at 526 and 528, “Ofoto Family Pics” at 530, and “Ofoto Trip Pics” at 532. A user may select one or more of the indicia, after which network browser 112 loads the associated web page(s) into a web-page viewing area 534.
History indicia 504 are presented based on their order determined at block 210. Here user interface module 114 presents indicia for the top seven web pages based on which have been viewed by the user most often in the last three weeks. The indicia may comprise text or a graphic or icon (e.g., text 536 and icon 538). Here the indicia are square tiles comprising an icon provided by the particular web page or textual indicia created by user interface module 114.
The user interface module can use metadata associated with the web page to create indicia. For example, the user interface module can truncate the URL for the web page and display it. Often a first portion of a URL is not particularly descriptive of the page; truncating it can allow a descriptive indicia without requiring extensive space to present it. For example, for a URL of:
HTTP::\\www.msn.com\uq2k3j42\239u8421d\mediaplayer
The user interface module truncates the URL to “mediaplayer.” This indicia is shown at 536.
Searching User-Associated Web Pages
Process 600, shown in
Block 602 enables a user to enter a search. Continuing the illustrated embodiment described above, user interface module 114 provides search entry field 410 as part of navigable window 400 of
Block 604 receives search characters, such as a word.
Block 606 searches user-associated web pages based on the search characters. Block 606 can search one type of user-associated web page, such as just history, feeds, or favorites. Block 606 can also search multiple or all types, regardless of how the pages are associated with a user. This enables a user with a single search to see web pages having a search term or character that the user has viewed (either recently or ever), marked as a favorite, and marked as associated with a desired feed, for example. By default search module 116 searches all user-associated web pages.
Search module 116 can search with all of the search characters at once or one-at-a-time as they are entered. Here the search module searches character-by-character with each new character causing another search of that character and predecessor characters. So the search module searches for user-associated web pages and their indicia or other metadata for a “C”, then for a “Ca”, then for a “Can”, and so forth. This can enable a user to quickly find user-associated web pages by searching in real time. A user may find the web page he or she is looking for with only “Can”, thereby saving the user time.
Block 606 can search for character matches in a web page itself and metadata for the web page. Here the search module searches text in the web page itself and metadata. The metadata can comprise the web pages' titles or URLs, metatag keywords, metatag descriptions, and user-defined keywords.
Block 608 determines an order or hierarchy for the results, such as through a user-driven weighted search. Here search module 116 weighs the results based at least in part on user-driven factors for the web pages, such as user-defined keywords, user-defined titles, and the like. The search module orders the results of the “Canon” search with a highest weight given for a user-defined keyword match (if the web pages have user-defined keywords), followed by descending weighting factors for the titles and URLs, the full text, and the metatags.
Block 608 can also arrange the results into groups having a similarity. The grouping can be based on those web pages having the same domain name and/or the same user-associated type (e.g., history, feeds, and favorites). Here the results of the “Canon” search of the history, feeds, and favorites web pages comprise eleven web pages. The groups defined here are those web pages from favorites (two pages), those from feeds (two pages), those sharing the “eBay” domain name (three pages), and those sharing the “CNET” domain name (four pages).
Block 610 presents indicia for user-associated web pages responsive to the search. Block 610 can present the indicia in a flat list or a hierarchy (e.g., a tree). Here the user interface module presents indicia 704 oriented in a tree by groups 706, 708, 710, and 712 in indicia region 502 shown in
The user interface module can present the indicia in real time, here with the search module presenting web pages having just a “C”, then those having “Ca”, and so forth (these results are not shown—only results of “Canon” are shown).
The indicia may comprise icons or graphics for the web pages (not shown). It may also comprise text resulting from the search. Text resulting from the search can comprise the search characters and surrounding, previous, or following characters. This provides the user with a small snap shot of the content of the web page. The indicia in
Marking and Opening Multiple Web Pages
The tools also enable a user to mark multiple web pages with a single user action. A user may mark a group of web pages as favorites or as one favorite for the entire group. The tools can also open multiple web pages with a single user action.
Process 800, shown in
Block 802 enables selection of one or more indicia of multiple web pages. Block 802 can present indicia for web pages resulting from a search (either of user-associated web pages or otherwise), selection by a user, a list of user-associated web pages, or otherwise.
Continuing the illustrated embodiment described above, consider again
Block 804 receives a user's selection of multiple web pages. Here a user selects indicia for four web pages with a single user action, that of clicking on group heading 720 entitled “CNET.com.”
Block 806 opens multiple web pages responsive to a user's selection. Here marking/opening module 120 opens web pages associated with the four indicia presented as part of group 712. The web pages may be presented in separate windows or one may be presented and the others readied for presentation.
Block 808 receives a user's selection to mark multiple web pages. A user may select one indicia for multiple pages, all web pages currently opened, multiple indicia for multiple web pages, and the like. The user may do so with a single or multiple user actions. In
Block 810 marks multiple web pages. Here marking/opening module 120 marks all of the web pages under heading 720 as favorites responsive to the user's single action. The module can mark each web page as a separate favorite or as a single favorite having multiple web pages. Here the module marks a single favorite having these four web pages.
After marking web pages as a single favorite, a user may select to open all of the web pages in the favorite with a single user action. The tools may do so following block 802 or otherwise.
The above-described tools present indicia for implicitly and explicitly user-associated web pages of a network browser application. They can permit a user to view and interact with different types of user-associated web pages in a single graphic interface. This can make easier or more intuitive a user's interaction with his or her favorite, feed, and history web pages. Although the tools have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed system, method, and/or computer-readable media.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/898,534, filed Oct. 5, 2010, which is a divisional application and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/179,155, filed on Jul. 12, 2005, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5404488 | Kerrigan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5649186 | Ferguson | Jul 1997 | A |
5819284 | Farber et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5880767 | Liu | Mar 1999 | A |
5923326 | Bittinger et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926796 | Walker et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5974549 | Golan | Oct 1999 | A |
6085186 | Christianson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094657 | Hailpern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6282546 | Gleichauf et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6366912 | Wallent et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411331 | Sansom-Wai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434745 | Conley, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460060 | Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6544295 | Bodnar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594692 | Reisman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6633316 | Maddalozzo, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6667751 | Wynn et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6694431 | Binding et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708172 | Wong et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732102 | Khandekar | May 2004 | B1 |
6775772 | Binding et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6917302 | Lilleness et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7100114 | Burleson | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7143084 | Rinearson et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7257564 | Loughmiller et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7366996 | Hoyle | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7424476 | Apparao et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7685426 | Ramos et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7730054 | Marmaros et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7831547 | Epling et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
9141716 | Epling et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010032258 | Ishida et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020091697 | Huang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108115 | Palmer | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116630 | Stehlin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020156905 | Weissman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174201 | Ramer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194151 | Fenton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196272 | Ramos | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014406 | Faieta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030117511 | Belz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135504 | Elvanoglu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167402 | Stolfo et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040003097 | Willis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046885 | Regan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078452 | Jamieson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093563 | Pasquali | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111319 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122939 | Perkins | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143683 | Greenwood | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181753 | Michaelides | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225749 | Pavlik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230676 | Spivack et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250115 | Gemmel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267815 | De Mes | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010595 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015452 | Corson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022132 | Herzberg | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033657 | Herrington et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038717 | McQueen, II et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050460 | Bedingfield, Sr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065906 | Romero | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097180 | Abdelhak | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108227 | Russell-Falla et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119910 | Schneider | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119913 | Hornreich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165615 | Minar | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171836 | Leacy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216439 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256768 | Robinson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060230021 | Diab et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060294124 | Cho | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016543 | Epling et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061711 | Bodin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094389 | Nussey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100836 | Eichstaedt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100959 | Eichstaedt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130518 | Shavit et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070282973 | Chapman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2496672 | Feb 2004 | CA |
1265208 | Aug 2000 | CN |
0207013 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2004107216 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005027402 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005089336 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005098675 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Final Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7017733”, dated Mar. 31, 2016, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 06786029.6”, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 7 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Apr. 10, 2009, 9 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Jun. 30, 2009, 10 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Aug. 19, 2009, 11 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Feb. 17, 2010, 18 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Apr. 21, 2010, 13 pgs. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Korean Application No. 10-2008-7000928”, dated Mar. 29, 2013, 2 Page. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Korean Application No. 10-2013-7009981”, dated Jan. 29, 2014, 2 Pages. |
“Notice of Preliminary Rejection Issued in Korean Application No. 10-2013-7009981”, dated Jul. 9, 2013, 11 Pages. |
“Notice of Preliminary Rejection Issued in Korean Application No. 10-2015-7017733”, dated Sep. 1, 2015, 12 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210517609.7”, dated Mar. 1, 2016, 4 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Oct. 16, 2013, 9 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Jan. 27, 2012, 9 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Aug. 31, 2012, 9 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Feb. 3, 2015, 9 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Apr. 14, 2014, 9 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Aug. 6, 2014, 10 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Jun. 24, 2013, 8 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated May 17, 2012, 8 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Sep. 22, 2011, 8 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated Jan. 16, 2014, 8 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/898,534”, dated May 20, 2015, 5 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210517609.7”, dated Sep. 1, 2015,7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7014662”, dated Aug. 31, 2016, 9 Pages. |
“Adobe Acrobat 7.0.5: Acrobat Tracker”, Retrieved from http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/acrobaVsdk/pdf/javascriptJT- racker_pdf, (Jul. 27, 2005),48 pages. |
“European Search Report”, dated Dec. 2, 2010, Application No. EP/06786029, Filed Date: Nov. 30, 2010, 9 pages. |
“FeedBurner: About Syndication, RSS, and Other Web-Altering Chemicals”, Retrieved from http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/aboutrss;jsessionid=96C24011924801F8B3CAF4- F12B66B75D__app2 on Jun. 21, 2005, 2 pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210517609.7”, dated Apr. 3, 2015, 11 pages. |
“I/ON User Guide”, Retrieved from http://openvision.tv/home/viewer/tutorial on Jan. 16, 2006, 7 pages. |
“iSpeak It: Web Feeds and Podcasts”, Retrieved from http://www.zapptek.com/ispeak-iU webpage.html on Jun. 21, 2005, Zapp Tek, (2002), 4 pages. |
“Latest Headline Viewer News and Information”, Version: 0.9.9, Mar. 2, 2005, printed from website: http://www.headlineviewer.com/newslindex.shtml on Jun. 21, 2005, (Mar. 2, 2005), 4 pages. |
“MX RSS Reader-Writer Use RSS Feeds in Your Sites”, InterAKT, Retrieved from http://www.interakonline.com/Products/Dr.eamweaver-Extensions/MXRSSReader-Writerl_Overviewl ?from=!:j!:j_rss on Jun. 21, 2005, 2 pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7031797”, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 5 pages. |
“Project: RSS Viewer: Summary”, SourceForge, 2005, Retrieved from http://sourceforge.net/_projects/rssview/ on Jun. 21, 2005 (2005), 4 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Feb. 12, 2008),6 pages. |
“Six Apart: Developer Documentation: TrackBack Technical Specification”, Retrieved from http://www.sixapart.com/pronet/docsitrackback spec on Feb. 15, 2008, 5 pages. |
“Welcome to Feed on Feeds, Your Server Side Personal RSS (and Atom!) Aggregator”, Retrieved from http://feedonfeeds.com/ on Jun. 21, 2005, 4 pages. |
“What is Reptile?”, Retrieved from http://reptile.openprivacy.org/overview.html on Jun. 21, 2005, (2001),4 pages. |
Andersen, Starr et al., “Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP”, Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/techneUprodtechnol/_winxppro/maintain/sp2brows.mspx on Jul. 7, 2005, (Aug. 9, 2004), 58 pages. |
Apple Computer Inc., “Mac OS X Server Collaboration Services”, Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/collaborationservices.ht ml on Jun. 21, 2005, (2005), 3 pages. |
Apple, “Safari RSS: Your Desktop is the New Doorstep”, Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/safari/ on Jun. 21, 2005 (2005), 4 pages. |
Chinese Decision on Re-Examination in Application 200680025300.9, dated Jun. 21, 2012, 8 pgs. |
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Application 200680025300.9, dated Sep. 26, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Chinese Notice on Third Office Action in Application 200680025300.9, dated Jul. 9, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Domingue, et al., “Magpie: supporting browsing and navigating on the semantic web”, In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2004, located at: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/970000/964479/p191-, 8 pgs. |
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated May 1, 2008), 7 pages. |
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Apr. 30, 2009), 8 pages. |
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Dec. 21, 2009), 8 pages. |
Foreign Office Action, Application Serial No. 200680025300.9, (dated Mar. 27, 2009), 11 pages. |
Foreign Office Action, Application Serial No. 200680025300.9, (dated Mar. 2, 2010), 12 pages. |
Foreign Office Action, Chinese Application No. 200680025300.9, (dated Jun. 25, 2010), 12 pages. |
Galbraith, David et al., “RSS Ping”, Retrieved from http://rssping.com on Jan. 16, 2006, 2 pages. |
Gandhi, et al., “Domain Name Based Visualization of Web Histories in a Zoomable User Interface”, In Proceedings of 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2000, located at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=875085, 9 pgs. |
Google, Inc., “Google Search Appliance Feeds Protocol Developer's Guide”, Retrieved from http://code.google.com/gsa_apis/feedsguide.html on Jun. 21, 2005 (Jun. 2, 2005), 11 pages. |
Kaasten. et al., “Designing an Integrated Bookmark / History System for Web Browsing”, Retrieved at <<http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/grouplab/uploads/Publications/Publications/2000-Kaasten.Skigraph.pdf>>, Proceedings of the Western Computer Graphics Symposium, Mar. 26-29, 2000, pp. 4. |
Keller, et al., “A Bookmarking Service for Organizing and Sharing URLs”, Proceeding: Selected papers from the sixth international conference on World Wide Web, vol. 29, Issue 08-13, Sep. 1997, pp. 1103-1114. |
Korean Final Rejection in Application 10-2012-7030486, dated Jul. 31, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection in Application 10-2008-7000928, dated Sep. 24, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection in Application 10-2013-7031797, dated Feb. 24, 2014, 9 pgs. |
Korean Trial Board Decision in Application 10-2012-7030486, dated Oct. 29, 2014, 20 pgs. |
Microsoft, “Increase Your Browsing and E-Mail Safety”, Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/security/incidenU_settings.mspx on Jul. 7, 2005, (Oct. 3, 2003), 4 pages. |
Mozilla, “Firefox—Rediscover the Web”, Retrieved from hftp://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox on Jul. 7, 2005, (Jun. 17, 2005), 4 pages. |
Munsch, John “Dreams of a Rarebit Fiend”, Retrieved from http://www.johnmunsch.com/projects/HotSheeU on Jun. 21, 2005, 6 pages. |
Nadeem, et al., “A Study of Three Browser History Mechanisms for Web Navigation”, In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Information Visualisation, Jul. 25, 2001, located at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=942034, 9 pgs. |
Non Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Jul. 6, 2007), 9 pages. |
Non Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Nov. 28, 2008), 6 pages. |
Non Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Jul. 14, 2009), 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Mar. 2, 2010), 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, (dated Jul. 26, 2010), 7 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application PCT/US2006/025689, dated Sep. 17, 2007, 9 pgs. |
Tetrault, Gregory “Review: Anonymizer Ultimate Security Suite”, Retrieved from http://www.atpm.com/81.09/anonymizer.shtml on Jul. 7, 2005, ATPM, (Sep. 2002),12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Dec. 5, 2007, 13 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Feb. 27, 2008, 5 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,155, Amendment and Response filed Oct. 31, 2008, 10 pgs. |
Korean Trial Board Decision in Application 10-2013-7031797, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 21 pgs. |
Korean Office Action Issued in Application No. 10-2016-7014662, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 5 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160011760 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11179155 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12898534 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12898534 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 14859664 | US |