The invention relates to a seat adjuster having a crank that is rotatable about an axis, and a pinion having a toothed segment that is centered on said axis.
Seat adjusters of this type are used for example in automotive vehicles for adjusting the inclination of the seat back or adjusting the height of the seat. For example, in case of a seat height adjuster, the crank is rotatably mounted on a frame of the seat, whereas a free end of the crank is articulated to a member that is rigidly connected to the vehicle body. The pinion is driven by means of an electric motor or manually via a lever and drives the crank, via the toothed segment, to perform a pivotal movement with the result that the position of the seat frame changes relative to the member that is connected the vehicle body. When the desired seat position has been reached, the pinion is blocked in the position that it has reached, for example by means of a free wheel brake, so that the crank and the seat frame are also immobilized in the desired position.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,633,556 A discloses toothed gears and cams that are each formed by a packet of lamella stacked one upon the other, which may simply be punched from relatively thin sheet metal. For minimizing waste, the cams are punched out of the area of the gear, so that openings with shapes corresponding to those of the cams are left in the gear.
In seat adjusters for automotive vehicles, the crank must have a very high mechanical strength and breaking resistance, in order to assure the safety of the vehicle passengers belted to the seat in case of an accident.
For this reason, in known seat adjusters of the type mentioned above, the crank is punched from a relatively thick sheet.
It is an object of the invention to provide a seat adjuster with improved breaking resistance.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by the feature that the crank is formed by a packet of at least three lamella that are stacked one upon the other and tightly held together.
If, in case of a collision of the vehicle, the forces of inertia acting upon the seat result in a rupture of the crank, then this rupture typically starts from a minute crack that forms in the most strained portion of the crank and then spreads unobstructedly over the entire crank. In contrast, in the seat adjuster according to the invention, the spreading of the crack remains confined to the concerned lamella whereas the other lamella remain faultless, initially, and since the lamella are tightly held together, obstruct the spreading of the crack of the failing lamella. In this way, a considerable portion of the impact energy can be consumed, thus avoiding a failure of the entire crank which would the result in the vehicle seat being torn off from its mount.
Since, moreover, the thickness of the sheet to be punched in a single punching step corresponds only to the thickness of a single lamella, it is possible to use, for a given force of the punching press, sheet metals with a higher hardness, so that the mechanical strength of the crank is increased further or the total thickness and, accordingly, the weight of the crank can be reduced without compromising the strength.
Surprisingly, the manufacture of the crank from a plurality of lamella that are punched-out individually does not lead to an increase of the total waste, neither, but on the contrary to a reduction of the waste percentage. Basically, this is due to the fact that, because of the smaller cutting forces, the grip area that surrounds the lamella to be punched-out and with which the blank is firmly held in the punching tool during the punching process may be reduced.
Advantageous embodiments and further developments of the invention are indicated in the dependent claims.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, lamella with different shapes are combined in a single crank. In this way, it may be achieved that the crank is formed by the full number of lamella only in those regions that are strained most, whereas regions that are subject to lower strain may be formed by only a smaller number of lamella, resulting in savings of material and waste.
It may also be advantageous to combine lamella with different thicknesses and/or lamella from sheet metals of different grades. For example, by combining harder sheets with softer and more ductile sheets, the hardness of the crank as a whole may be increased while the brittleness is kept in acceptable limits.
Embodiment examples of the invention will now be explained in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
a-d are views for illustrating the punching process;
In
The crank 12 is formed by a packet of several—five in this example—lamella 18 stacked one upon another and having all the same contour in this example. The crank 12 has an opening 20 which is approximately circular but has a corrugated edge and with which the crank can be keyed non-rotatably on a shaft 22 (
In the example shown, the pinion 14 is also composed of a plurality of stacked lamella, which, however, is not essential for understanding the invention.
The individual lamella 18 of the crank 12 are form-fittingly caulked with one another at a plurality of fixing points 30 that are distributed over the area of the crank.
The construction and function of the seat adjuster 10 shall be explained by reference to
The pinion 14 is rotatably supported on the seat frame 34 and is driven by a drive mechanism that has not been shown, e.g. an electric motor or a gear and a manipulating lever. As the pinion 14 meshes with a toothed segment 16, a rotation of the pinion translates into a pivotal movement of the crank 12 about the axis A that is defined by the. shaft 22, and, accordingly, the seat frame 34 is adjusted in height relative to the member 36. The drive train for the pinion 14 includes a free wheel brake that assures that the pinion 14, when it is not driven, is self-lockingly immobilized in its position and thereby holds also the crank 12 in the angular position that has been reached.
The punching process has been illustrated in
a shows the contours of two lamella 18 the toothed segments of which are opposed to one another as described above.
b shows the essential parts of a punching press 40 in a sectional view corresponding to the line B-B in
In
d shows the condition after the punching step. The punch 44 has been lowered so that its cutting projections have passed through the openings in the matrix 42. Accordingly, two punched lamella 18 are ejected downwardly whereas the rest of the blank 38 remains as waste in the punching device and will be removed later when the blank is advanced.
Since the blank 38 has to have only the thickness of a single lamella 18, the cutting force occurring in the punching process described above are relatively small. This permits, on the one hand, to use for the blank 38 a sheet metal grade that has a particularly high hardness and/or toughness, so that a higher strength of the crank 12 is achieved for a given total thickness. On the other hand, due to the smaller sheet thickness, the areas in which the blank 38 is clamped between the matrix 42 and the clamping tool 46 outside of the lamella 18 to be punched-out may be kept relatively small. Would the entire crank 12 be punched from a single sheet having a thickness larger by a factor of five, then the cutting forces, in particular in the region of the toothed segments 16, would become so high that a significantly larger space between the two toothed segments would be required in order for the webs of the matrix 42 and the clamping tool 46, that hold the sheet between the toothed segments 16, to have a sufficient stability and to clamp the sheet so firmly that the metal will not flow, but the sheet will be cut smoothly. In this case, the distances between the individual punching positions would have to be significantly larger, so that the total mass of the produced waste in relation to the mass of the cranks being produced would be significantly larger.
Also, the forces occurring in the joint opening 28 in the extension 26 are relatively small for a given torque, because the forces are distributed over a larger area at the periphery of the joint opening 28 and, moreover, the force is reduced due to the greater leverage.
At the fixing points 30, the lamella 18a and 18b are held together in this example by means of pins 48 that are inserted therethrough, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202011050521.9 | Jun 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/061096 | 6/12/2012 | WO | 00 | 12/19/2013 |