Seat apparatus and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9316089
  • Patent Number
    9,316,089
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 17, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 19, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A downhole fracturing system including a seat assembly having a plurality of like-sized openings therein. Each of the like-sized openings has a cross sectional area complementary to a corresponding plurality of objects such that each of the objects is matable therewith to substantially inhibit fluid flow through each like-sized opening. The objects have dimensions insufficient to mate with an opening in a next adjacent upstream seat assembly. A method of hydraulic fracturing is also included.
Description
BACKGROUND

Seats such as, for example ball seats are well known in downhole industries and especially so in the drilling and completion industry. Commonly, ball seats are used to regulate the flow of fluids and actuate downhole devices. Although ball seat configurations are many and are ubiquitous in their use within the art, the number of stacked ball seats that can be employed with traditional systems is limited. Improving the number of ball seats that may be stacked in a borehole will be welcomed by the art.


SUMMARY

A downhole fracturing system including a seat assembly having a plurality of like-sized openings therein, each of the like-sized openings having a cross sectional area complementary to a corresponding plurality of objects such that each of the objects is matable therewith to substantially inhibit fluid flow through each like-sized opening, the objects having dimensions insufficient to mate with an opening in a next adjacent upstream seat assembly.


A hydraulic fracturing system, including a first seat assembly including at least one first opening therethrough having at least one first cross-sectional area, the first seat assembly operatively arranged to receive a first object having a first size greater than the first cross-sectional area while permitting smaller objects to pass through the at least one first opening; and a second seat assembly positioned downstream of the first seat assembly and having a plurality of second openings, each of the second openings having a second cross-sectional area, the second seat assembly operatively arranged to receive a plurality of second objects each having a second size smaller than the first size after the second objects have passed through the at least one opening in the first seat assembly, each one of the plurality of second openings corresponding to a corresponding one of the second objects for obstructing fluid flow through the second openings when the second objects are landed at the second seat assembly.


A method of hydraulic fracturing including dropping a plurality of first objects each having a first size; landing the plurality of first objects at a first seat assembly, each of the plurality of first objects associated with one of a plurality of first openings in the first seat assembly; obstructing fluid flow through the first seat assembly with the plurality of first objects; and performing a fracturing operation with fluid upstream of the first seat assembly.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several figures:



FIG. 1A depicts a downhole system including a first seat assembly arranged upstream of a second seat assembly;



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a ball seat;



FIG. 2 is a cut-away side view of the ball seat of FIG. 1;



FIG. 2a is a cut-away side view of the ball seat of FIG. 1 illustrating the parabolic embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a side cut-away view of a portion of an alternate embodiment of a ball seat;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of another alternate embodiment of a ball seat; and



FIG. 5 is a side cut-away view of the ball seat of FIG. 4.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an exemplary embodiment of a ball seat 10 is illustrated. The ball seat 10 includes a housing 12 that includes tubular orifices 14. The tubular orifices 14 define flow paths indicated by the arrows 11. Seats 16 are disposed at the apertures of the orifices 14. The illustrated embodiment includes concave portions 18 defined by the housing 12. The concave portions may be, for example, conical (see FIG. 2), parabolic (see FIG. 2a), or cylindrical in shape.



FIG. 2 illustrates a cut-away view of the ball seat 10. In operation, the ball seat 10 may be placed downhole in a borehole. A first object 20 such as, for example, a spherical object may be introduced into the borehole and driven towards the ball seat 10 by, for example, hydraulic pressure or gravity. One of the concave portions 18 directs the first object 20 into engagement with a seat 16; blocking an orifice 14 and obstructing a flow path 11. A second object 22 may similarly be driven towards the ball seat 10 and directed by the concave portions 18 into the empty seat 16; blocking the second orifice 14 and obstructing the second flow path 11. The obstruction of the flow paths allows an operator to pressure up against the obstructed ball seat 10 to facilitate a downhole pressure based operation. This may be a fracturing job or actuation of a desired downhole device, or to otherwise effect desired downhole operations.


Previous ball seat devices using a single orifice and seat arrangement may be less effective when the cross sectional areas of the orifice (and the associated diameter of the object) are less than a defined threshold cross sectional area. The threshold diameter may be a different diameter for different borehole systems and is associated with the likelihood of a pressure increase upstream of the orifice due to its restricted flow area. Orifice cross sectional areas less than the threshold cross sectional area may undesirably restrict the flow of fluid and cause the undesired and premature actuation of tools or other premature operations uphole relative to the ball seat device. The illustrated embodiments having more than one orifice allow the cross sectional areas of individual orifices (and the associated diameter of the objects) to be reduced while avoiding the restriction of the flow of fluid since the use of multiple orifices allows the net cross sectional area of the orifices to remain greater than the threshold cross sectional area.



FIG. 3 illustrates a side cut-away view of a portion of an alternate exemplary embodiment of a ball seat 30. The ball seat 30 is similar in operation to the ball seat 10 (of FIGS. 1 and 2) however; the seats 16 in the illustrated embodiment are disposed in different planes (A and B). In the illustrated example, the plane B is located downstream in the flow path direction (as indicated by the arrows 11) relative to the plane A. The disposition of the seats 16 in different planes may improve the performance of the ball seat 30.



FIG. 4 illustrates another alternate embodiment of a ball seat 40. The ball seat 40 operates in a similar manner to the embodiments described above, and includes a plurality of seats 16 and concave portions 18. In the illustrated embodiment, a seat 17 and associated flow path 15 have an axis coincident to the longitudinal axis 19 of the ball seat 40. The seats 16 and associated flow paths 14 are disposed radialy about the axis 19 in the housing 12. FIG. 5 illustrates a side partially cut-away view of a portion of the ball seat 40 (of FIG. 4).


The Figures described above illustrate exemplary embodiments of ball seats. Other embodiments may include any number of ball seats having multiple seat portions, flow paths, alignment planes, and shapes that are operative to direct objects to engage the seats.


While one or more embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A downhole fracturing system comprising: a seat assembly having a plurality of like-sized openings therein, each of the like-sized openings having a cross sectional area complementary to a corresponding plurality of objects such that each of the objects is matable therewith to substantially inhibit fluid flow through each like-sized opening, the objects having dimensions insufficient to mate with an opening in a next adjacent upstream seat assembly, wherein a first opening of the plurality of like-sized openings is disposed on a first plane and a second opening of the plurality of like-sized openings is disposed on a second plane off-set of the first plane along an axis extending substantially longitudinally through the seat assembly.
  • 2. The seat apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the seat assembly includes a concave portion operative to guide the objects towards the like-sized openings.
  • 3. The seat apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the like-sized openings are coplanar.
  • 4. The seat apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the objects are spherically shaped.
  • 5. A hydraulic fracturing system, comprising: a first seat assembly including at least one first opening therethrough having at least one first cross-sectional area, the first seat assembly operatively arranged to receive a first object having a first size greater than the first cross-sectional area while permitting smaller objects to pass through the at least one first opening; anda second seat assembly positioned downstream of the first seat assembly and having a plurality of second openings, each of the second openings having a second cross-sectional area, the second seat assembly operatively arranged to receive a plurality of second objects each having a second size smaller than the first size, after the second objects have passed through the at least one opening in the first seat assembly, each one of the plurality of second openings corresponding to a corresponding one of the second objects for obstructing fluid flow through the second openings when the second objects are landed at the second seat assembly, wherein a first opening of the plurality of second openings is disposed on a first plane and a second opening of the plurality of second openings is disposed on a second plane off-set of the first plane along an axis extending substantially longitudinally through the second seat assembly.
  • 6. A method of hydraulic fracturing comprising: dropping a plurality of first objects each having a first size;landing the plurality of first objects at a first seat assembly, each of the plurality of first objects associated with one of a plurality of first openings in the first seat assembly, wherein a first one of the plurality of first openings is disposed on a first plane and a second one of the plurality of first openings is disposed on a second plane off-set of the first plane along an axis extending substantially longitudinally through the first seat assembly;obstructing fluid flow through the first seat assembly with the plurality of first objects; andperforming a fracturing operation with fluid upstream of the first seat assembly.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein dropping the plurality of first objects includes passing the plurality of first objects through at least one second opening in a second seat assembly located upstream of the first seat assembly.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising dropping a second object having a second size larger than the first size and landing the second object at the second seat assembly in order to obstruct fluid flow through the second seat assembly.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a Continuation of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 12/482,181 filed on Jun. 10, 2009, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (67)
Number Name Date Kind
1258418 Kemble Mar 1918 A
1712948 Burch May 1929 A
1998833 Crowell Apr 1935 A
2153034 Baker Apr 1939 A
2320670 Scaramucci Jun 1943 A
2737244 Baker Mar 1956 A
2769454 Bletcher et al. Nov 1956 A
2799349 Clark, Jr. Jul 1957 A
2973006 Nelson Sep 1957 A
3007527 Nelson Jan 1958 A
2825412 Standridge Mar 1958 A
3211232 Grimmer Mar 1961 A
3062296 Brown Nov 1962 A
3130783 Orr Apr 1964 A
3510103 Carsello Feb 1968 A
3371717 Chenoweth Mar 1968 A
3566964 Livingston Mar 1971 A
3727635 Todd Apr 1973 A
3867985 Wilkinson Feb 1975 A
4253524 Erickson Mar 1981 A
4258801 Poston Mar 1981 A
4266605 LaBorde et al. May 1981 A
4341272 Marshall Jul 1982 A
4427062 Tower Jan 1984 A
4574894 Jadwin Mar 1986 A
4669538 Szarka Jun 1987 A
4694855 Cunningham Sep 1987 A
4826135 Mielke May 1989 A
4834620 Sweeney May 1989 A
4889199 Lee Dec 1989 A
4893678 Stokley et al. Jan 1990 A
5297580 Thurman Mar 1994 A
5332045 Ross et al. Jul 1994 A
5392862 Swearingen Feb 1995 A
5396953 Holder et al. Mar 1995 A
5404945 Head et al. Apr 1995 A
5494107 Bode Feb 1996 A
5593292 Ivey Jan 1997 A
5673751 Head et al. Oct 1997 A
5695009 Hipp Dec 1997 A
5730222 Rike, Jr. Mar 1998 A
5960881 Allamon et al. Oct 1999 A
5999687 Abraham et al. Dec 1999 A
6155350 Melenyzer Dec 2000 A
6283148 Spears et al. Sep 2001 B1
6431270 Angle Aug 2002 B1
6776240 Kenison et al. Aug 2004 B2
7069997 Coyes et al. Jul 2006 B2
7186182 Wenzel et al. Mar 2007 B2
7331397 Wagley et al. Feb 2008 B1
7500526 Telfer Mar 2009 B2
7530400 Telfer May 2009 B2
7533728 Winslow et al. May 2009 B2
7640991 Leising Jan 2010 B2
7766034 Talaski Aug 2010 B2
7775284 Richards et al. Aug 2010 B2
7798236 McKeachnie et al. Sep 2010 B2
20040118564 Themig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20050126638 Gilbert Jun 2005 A1
20060124310 Lopez De Cardenas et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070062706 Leising Mar 2007 A1
20070261855 Brunet et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070272413 Rytlewski et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070295507 Telfer et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080011487 Bertane et al. Jan 2008 A1
20100084146 Roberts Apr 2010 A1
20120061103 Hurtado Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
2544091 Apr 2003 CN
2584867 Nov 2003 CN
9803766 Jan 1998 WO
9803766 Jan 1998 WO
WO0190529 Nov 2001 WO
WO02068793 Sep 2002 WO
WO2006134446 Dec 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Taken from the Internet on Oct. 11, 2010 from http://www.dsi-pblcom/downloads/4%203qtr%20Inch%20Procedure%202007.pdf.
Imhoff, Jamie, et al. Baker Hughes Incorporated, “Composites Improve Well Construction Efficiency”, SPE-125084-PP, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., Presentation at the 2009 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, Oct. 4-7, 2009, pp. 1-12.
McCasland, Mark, et al., “Predicting and Mitigating Erosion of Downhole Flow-Control Equipment in Water-Injector Completions”, SPE 90179, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., Presentation at the SPE Annual Technical conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas Sep. 26-29, 2004, pp. 1-6.
Russell, Ronnie, et al., “Design, Analysis, and Full-Scale Erosion Testing of a Downhole Flow Control Device for High Rate Water Injection Wells” SPE 90759, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., Presentation at the SPE Annual Technical conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas Sep. 26-29, 2004, pp. 1-11.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/037979, dated Jan. 26, 2011, pp. 1-6.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140138098 A1 May 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12482181 Jun 2009 US
Child 13864767 US