This application is a national stage entry of International Application No. PCT/FR2009/000683, filed Jun. 10, 2009 designating the U.S., which claims the benefit of French Application No. 08.03310, filed Jun. 13, 2008.
The technical scope of the invention is that of seats for vehicles and namely seats for armoured vehicles.
Armoured vehicles are brought into an operation zone where they are confronted with mines and IEDs (the acronym for “Improvised Explosive Devices”). These IEDs are homemade devices but which can implement substantial masses of explosive or other energetic materials (petrol, gas).
The impacts received by the structure, and in particular the floor, of the vehicles are considerable and generally when the seats of such a vehicle are being designed they are made to be isolated from the vehicle floor.
Patent WO9800309 thus proposes to provide a deformable structure between the floor and the seat, such structure absorbing part of the shock communicated by the floor.
Patent WO03004958 proposes to ensure the rupture of the link between the floor and the ground.
A more interesting solution implemented today consists in suspending the seat from the roof or from a side wall. The seat and floor are thus uncoupled.
However, the shocks received by the vehicle cab communicate an acceleration to the cab whose excessive rate may cause serious injuries.
The aim of the invention is to propose a seat for an armoured vehicle that is simple in structure and that ensures, nevertheless, an excellent level of protection with respect to the shocks received by the vehicle during the explosion of a mine or IED.
Thus, the invention relates to a seat for an armoured vehicle, incorporating a back rest integral with a wall or the roof of the vehicle and a sitting part mounted able to pivot with respect to the back rest between a folded position in which it is substantially parallel to the back rest and an unfolded position where it is held by a limit stop and is substantially perpendicular to the back rest, such seat wherein the sitting part is connected to the back rest by linking means ensuring, in the event of a predetermined load, the release of the limit stop of the sitting part and its pivoting beyond the unfolded position.
According to another characteristic, the sitting part is mounted able to pivot between two vertical supports, the linking means incorporating at least one protrusion, organ, or device forming a limit stop and cooperating with a stop surface integral with one of the supports, the profile of the protrusion or organ, the stop surface and the shape of the supports being selected so that the protrusion or organ causes a deformation of the support when a predetermined load is exerted on the sitting part.
The supports may be formed of metallic plates, the stop surface itself being formed by a rim fitted to a face of the plate that is facing the pivoting sitting part.
The plate may incorporate a profile such that a load of a certain level exerted on the sitting part causes the plate to deform distancing the rim from the limit stop.
The seat may comprise two protrusions or organs each cooperating with a stop surface of a vertical support.
The invention will become more apparent from the following description of a particular embodiment, such description being made with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
With reference to
The sitting part 3 is mounted able to pivot with respect to supports 5 (and thus also with respect to the back rest 3 that is fastened to the supports) by means of pivots 6.
The sitting part 3 can thus move from a folded position (left part of
The pivoting of the sitting part 3 is stopped by two limit stops 8 that are integral with arms 9 attached to the sitting part and which also carry the pivots 6.
According to this first embodiment, the limit stops 8 come into contact with a rear face of the supports 5. These limit stops may be constituted by steel cylindrical rods that have a spherical end. The profile of the rod will be selected so as to be able to deform the support 5 for a load predetermined by calculation during the design of the seat.
The person occupying the seat is thus subjected to a load opposing Γ at a very high level. This load is communicated to the limit stops 8 by the sitting part 3. The length of the limit stops and their profile, which may be rounded, enables the supports 5 to be deformed and thus enables the limit stops 8 to be exceeded and the sitting part 3 to pivot beyond its unfolded position. The person occupying the seat is thus no longer subjected to a shock of a higher level than that needed to release the limit stops 8 of the chair. The person falls onto the cab floor but after the critical moment when the loads are at their highest.
Using appropriate tooling, it will be possible to reposition the sitting part in its folded position. The tooling will be designed to ensure an elastic deformation of supports 5 to enable a return behind the limit stop 8.
In this
We see that the support 5 incorporates a substantially triangular extension 5b onto which the pivot 6 for the sitting part is fastened. The stop surface is formed here by a U-shaped rim 10 fastened (for example by welding) to the face of the plate 5 facing the pivoting sitting part 3 as well as its arms 9.
When a load of a certain level F is exerted on the sitting part 3, this load is broken down at each plate 5 into loads f exerted on the pivots 6. These loads f (beyond a certain level) will cause the plates 5 to buckle, thereby causing a transversal deformation of the extensions 5b to the supports 5 (arrow G). These deformations G, combined with the load that is exerted by each limit stop 8 on its rim 10, will lead to the passage of the limit stops 8, thereby releasing the sitting part 3.
A single support 5 is shown here. There is naturally a second identical support 5 parallel to this one and also provided with an rim 10 cooperating with another limit stop.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 03310 | Jun 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2009/000683 | 6/10/2009 | WO | 00 | 12/8/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/000970 | 1/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2796112 | Barsky | Jun 1957 | A |
3357736 | McCarthy | Dec 1967 | A |
3501200 | Ohta | Mar 1970 | A |
4349167 | Reilly | Sep 1982 | A |
5125598 | Fox | Jun 1992 | A |
5273240 | Sharon | Dec 1993 | A |
6053555 | Neale | Apr 2000 | A |
6179380 | Hoffman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6378939 | Knoll et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409243 | Hansen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6582015 | Jessup et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585190 | Mort | Jul 2003 | B2 |
7100991 | Schroth | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7270045 | Gonzalez | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7293818 | Kumpf et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7513558 | Hansen | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7618076 | Meynet et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20100102602 | Hansen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109393 | Hansen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117408 | Hansen | May 2010 | A1 |
20110074176 | Bettencourt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 30 631 | Jan 2003 | DE |
202 10 749 | Nov 2003 | DE |
103 17 314 | Jul 2004 | DE |
10 2004 048177 | Apr 2006 | DE |
WO9800309 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO03004958 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110074176 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |