This invention relates to arrangements of seats and more particularly, although not necessarily exclusively, to seating arrangements within cabins of aircraft or other passenger vehicles.
Commercial aircraft, especially passenger airplanes, often contain multiple seats in one or more cabins within the aircraft fuselage. Subject to their compliance with applicable safety regulations, seating arrangements may vary from airplane to airplane. Whereas passengers may prefer fewer seats per cabin to increase leg-room, privacy, or other proxies for decreased seat density, airplane operators may prefer greater seats per cabin to increase revenue for each flight. Further, depending on sizes and shapes of both seats and cabins, differing arrangements of seats may be preferred. Optimizing, or at least enhancing, both passenger comfort and revenue generation is a significant issue in cabin design and layout.
Disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,156,346 to Mercier is an arrangement of seats convertible into beds. The seats are disposed in parallel rows extending longitudinally within an aircraft. Rows are grouped in pairs, separated by aisles.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,663,173 to Corfitsen also discloses an arrangement of seats convertible into beds. The seats again form rows extending longitudinally within an aircraft. When converted to beds, however, passengers rest “one above the other.”
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0146004 of Plant illustrates yet another arrangement of aircraft seats convertible into beds. Unlike those of the Mercier and Corfitsen patents, the seats of the Plant application are angled relative to a longitudinal axis of the cabin. Pairs of seats are typically offset approximately ±15° from the longitudinal axis, and feet of the passengers of the port and starboard pairs of seats point toward the fuselage. The contents of the Mercier and Corfitsen patents and of the Plant application are incorporated herein in their entireties by this reference.
The present invention provide alternate seating arrangements to those of the foregoing patents and application. Various embodiments of the arrangements position seats at offsets from a longitudinal axis of a vehicle cabin. Unlike the seats of the Plant application, however, some of those of the prevent invention—while offset from the longitudinal axis—are not placed in parallel pairs. Instead, they are positioned generally in “V” shapes or in herringbone patterns. Other embodiments of paired seating arrangements are not offset from the longitudinal axis but rather are staggered throughout the cabin. Yet other versions of the invention include pairs of seat that are both parallel and offset from the longitudinal axis, but are placed so that feet of the port and starboard passengers point away from the fuselage. All embodiments contemplate providing seats that are convertible to beds, although this conversion is not required.
By contrast with conventional, longitudinally-oriented seat frames, many of those of the present invention may be positioned at angles to longitudinal axes (as noted above). As a result, the structures of the present invention may be lighter and less complex than many existing products. Lighter seating structures are especially valuable in the aircraft industry, as less fuel is required to convey the lighter structures from place to place.
It thus is an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide seats for passenger vehicles such as (but not necessarily limited to) aircraft.
It is another optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide seats configured for arrangements in various ways within vehicle cabins.
It is also an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide seats convertible into beds.
It is a further optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide arrangements of seats within passenger vehicle cabins.
It is, moreover, an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide arrangements of seats in which pairs may be positioned in a “V” shape or in a herringbone pattern.
It is yet another optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide arrangements of seats in which pairs are staggered laterally.
It is an additional optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide arrangements of seats in which feet of port and starboard passengers point away from the fuselage (or frame) of the vehicle.
Other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in appropriate fields with reference to the remaining text and drawings of this application.
Illustrated in
Cabin C typically may define a longitudinal axis L, a forward boundary FB, and a rearward boundary RB. Forward boundary FB frequently is closer to a cockpit of the aircraft A than is rearward boundary RB, although this is not always true. Seats S, further, preferably are oriented within cabin C so that passengers P face generally forward (in the direction of travel) of the aircraft A, although again this orientation may not always be required.
Three columns of seats S are illustrated in
An advantage of arrangement 10 is that no passenger feet directly abut any aisle or gangway G of cabin C when seats S are extended into beds. Further, arrangement 10 produces a relatively long sleeping area for passengers, as foot ends 14 of pairs of seats S effectively may nest between head end areas 18 of the fore pair of seats. In one presently preferred embodiment of arrangement 10, seats S have seating width of approximately twenty-five inches and provide sleeping length of approximately seventy-six inches.
Illustrated in
Again, though, pairs of seats S may be formed in a column symmetric about axis L, albeit with head end areas 18 of adjacent seats S forming the vertices of the “V” shapes. Foot ends 14, therefore, abut gangways G when the seats are formed into beds. Exemplary seat S3 may define a longitudinal axis S3L which forms a positive angle (α3) greater than ninety degrees with axis L, with seat S4 defining a longitudinal axis S4L forming an opposite, negative angle (α4) with axis L. Preferred values for the angle formed by axes S3L and L are between +90° to +150° (more preferably between +120° to +140°), whereas preferred values for the angle formed by axes S4L and L are between −90° and −150° (more preferably between −120° and −140°.
The remaining seats S are not paired in arrangement 20, as columns of single seats extend fore to aft along each wall of fuselage F. Nominally starboard seats such as seat S5 are parallel to seats such as seat S4, and nominally port seats such as seat S6 are parallel to seats such as S3. When extended into a bed, seat S5 has its foot end 14 abutting foot end 14 of seat S3 (albeit separated by a gangway G) and seat S6 has its foot end abutting foot end 14 of seat S4 (again albeit separated by a gangway G). Head ends 18 of seats S5 and S6 abut fuselage F. The set of exemplary seats S3-6, therefore, resembles a “W,” or herringbone, shape as shown in
An advantage of arrangement 20 is that each seat S may have ready access to aisle or gangway G. A presently-preferred embodiment of arrangement 20, moreover, admits twenty-six seats S within cabin C, increasing the density of the cabin C without sacrificing sleeping area for passengers. In this embodiment, seats S have seating width of approximately twenty-three inches and provide sleeping length of approximately eighty inches.
Arrangement 30 of seats S appears in
Additionally, gangways G no longer are positioned equidistant from axis L. In the version of arrangement 30 shown in
Shown in
Foot ends 14 of seats S in respective starboard and port columns C10 and C12 adjacent fuselage F point inward into cabin C, away from the fuselage F. Consequently, seats in column C10 are not parallel to those in column C12, instead being angled relative to axis L in opposite manners. Seats S in column C11 may be parallel to those of either column C10 or column C12, with
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustrating, explaining, and describing embodiments of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
This application is based on, claims priority to, and hereby refers to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/191,183, filed Sep. 5, 2008, entitled “Parallel Angled Seat Configuration,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61191183 | Sep 2008 | US |