This application is a 371 of PCT/NO2021/050107 filed on Apr. 28, 2021, published on Nov. 4, 2021 under publication number WO 2021/221515 A1, which claims priority benefits from Norwegian patent application Ser. No. 20/200,502 filed Apr. 28, 2020, the disclosure of each is incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
The present invention relates to a seating device with a reclining function.
About 80 percent of adults experience low back pain at some point in their lives. It is the most common cause of work-related disability and a leading contributor to lost work days. It is therefore important that it is easy for everyone to find a good sitting position with a satisfactory backrest.
Since recliners/sofas with movable backs came on the market, there has been a challenge with too much/too little lumbar support and that the lumbar support in the chair moves in relation to the anatomy of the user's spine when the chair back is laid back (the chair opens).
When sitting in the chair/sofa with the backrest in a more or less upright position, a user will find it comfortable that the backrest is shaped according to the anatomy of the user's spine, i.e. with a small sway and extra support against the lower back. The extra lumbar support is also ergonomically correct when being in a sitting position.
The challenge comes when the back is lowered to a resting position. Depending on how many degrees the chair/sofa mechanism allows, the lumbar support will no longer be as comfortable. It simply feels too hard and has “moved” upwards and will hit the user on the upper side of the lower back. How much depends on the anatomy of the chair and the movement pattern of the mechanism. In a more supine sitting position, the need for lumbar support is less and a more “flat” support surface is more ergonomically correct.
Throughout the ages, this has been attempted solved through a lot of trial and error as well as several patents. Common to them all is that they have almost no effect, or may not achieve the desired effect, at the same time these mechanisms are often complicated. There is still a need for a simple and effective solution to these problems.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a sitting device which avoids the above-mentioned problems with previously known devices and further provides an adapted support for the lumbar spine both in a sitting and reclining, resting or lying position.
The above-mentioned objects of the invention are achieved with a device as stated in the following patent claims.
The scope of the invention is defined in the following claims.
More particularly, the invention comprises a reclining function seating device comprising a seat, a back element and a rotatable hinge member.
The invention also comprises a back frame for use in a sitting device with a reclining function.
The invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description.
The backrest element 3 comprises a back frame 4 and padding 5, for example in foam, where the padding 5 is arranged on one or both sides of the frame.
The back frame 4, which is formed as a forward-shaped part, comprises at least one first resilient element 7 and one or more second resilient elements 8. The first resilient elements 7 are made of a material which is suitable for being made with prestress (bias) and which can withstand deformation during use, for example high carbon steel wire, molded plastic, rubber, curved steel strip, fiber casting, etc., preferably high carbon steel wire. The second resilient elements 8 are made of a material suitable for having a supporting or resilient effect, for example steel strip, plastic plate, textile webbing, fabric, rubber mat, high carbon steel wire, molded plastic, rubber, curved steel strip, fiber casting, etc. In case the resilient elements 7, 8 are made of steel wire, they may follow a zigzag pattern. The resilient elements 7 and 8 are independently bonded to the frame preferably at each end, either directly or via fasteners 6, preferably via rotatable fasteners. The fasteners 6 can be made of, for example, plastic, metal, leather, fabric or fiber.
In one embodiment, the elements 7, 8 are resilient and arcuate before mounting. The first resilient (yielding) element 7 follows a curve which has a smaller radius compared to the radius of the one or more other resilient elements 8. The first resilient element 7 is longer than the one or more other resilient elements 8. Mounting of these elements 7, 8 on the frame 4 gives them a prestress.
The first resilient element 7 has a carefully determined prestress, matched firmness and fastening. The one or more other elements 8 are located above and below the first element 7 and are considerably firmer and flatter. Distance (position) and matched firmness are based on the ergonomics of the spine and how much the back “moves” in relation to the user's lumbar support and the effect of the user's weight on the yielding element. The chairs will be manufactured in different sizes and hardness adapted to the individual customer as well as markets in e.g. Europe and Asia.
When the user is sitting in an upright position as shown in
When the backrest element 3 of the seating device 1 is placed backwards, the user lying (sitting) in the chair will distribute the weight on both the seat 2 and the backrest element 3, in relation to the upright position as shown in
The fasteners 6 will, due to their rotatability, reinforce this movement from the back frame. The back frame can be forward-striving, for example so that it follows the natural curvature of the user's back.
The padding 5 in the backrest element 3 is so soft that it yields to the extent that the weight exerted against the first resilient element 7 straightens and bends it backwards, but not so soft that the other elements 8 feel uncomfortable for the user.
The other elements 8 will stretch a little, but are less affected by these forces as they are harder, tighter and yield less compared to the first resilient element 7.
The other elements 8, on the other hand, must have a carefully positioned and coordinated firmness in order to “take over” the support of the first “yielding” element 7.
All the resilient elements 7, 8 must be mounted in a coordinated relationship with each other and the design of the back frame 4.
The total effect is that the padding 5 in the back element 3 becomes flatter in the supine position and the relative lumbar support is moved downwards because the other resilient elements 8 become more prominent than the first resilient element 7 in the supine position. On a normal chair/sofa, the area for lumbar support on the back of the chair that meets the spine will move upwards when the backrest element 3 is laid down (the chair opens). On the described seating device 1, the back frame 4 will become more prominent in the supine position and a more correct position, pressure and position of the lumbar support in relation to the anatomy of the spine of the user is maintained.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20200502 | Apr 2020 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2021/050107 | 4/28/2021 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/221515 | 11/4/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2835312 | Neely | May 1958 | A |
3241879 | Castello | Mar 1966 | A |
3550926 | Slominski | Dec 1970 | A |
4159847 | Arai | Jul 1979 | A |
4247089 | Crosby | Jan 1981 | A |
4283046 | Bowles, Jr. | Aug 1981 | A |
4296965 | Sakurada | Oct 1981 | A |
4371153 | Krakauer | Feb 1983 | A |
4565406 | Suzuki | Jan 1986 | A |
4586700 | Crosby | May 1986 | A |
4715587 | Grosby | Dec 1987 | A |
4815717 | Crosby | Mar 1989 | A |
5499863 | Nakane | Mar 1996 | A |
5538325 | Bullard | Jul 1996 | A |
5651584 | Chenot | Jul 1997 | A |
6565157 | Barile, Jr. | May 2003 | B2 |
6637824 | Yokota | Oct 2003 | B1 |
7090301 | Stadlbauer | Aug 2006 | B2 |
8991016 | Conway | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9420897 | Conway | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9771009 | Kijima | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20040245841 | Beukema | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20090015050 | Dehli | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090250991 | Mossbeck | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20150013118 | Conway | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
848407 | Sep 1952 | DE |
1218371 | May 1960 | FR |
1307745 | Oct 1965 | FR |
1417751 | Nov 1965 | FR |
649649 | Jan 1951 | GB |
2009061204 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in corresponding PCT/No. 2021/050107 on Aug. 25, 2021 (8 pages). |
Norwegian Search Report mailed in corresponding No. 20200502 on Jun. 24, 2022 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230157452 A1 | May 2023 | US |