1. Field of the Disclosure
Embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to secondary cutting structures for use on drilling tool assemblies. More specifically, embodiments disclosed herein relate to secondary cutting structures having a plurality of cutting element rows disposed on cutter blocks. More specifically still, embodiments disclosed herein relate to secondary cutting structures having more than two cutting element rows disposed on cutter blocks.
2. Background Art
The drill string 16 includes several joints of drill pipe 16a connected end to end through tool joints 16b. The drill string 16 is used to transmit drilling fluid (through its hollow core) and to transmit rotational power from the drill rig 10 to the BHA 18. In some cases the drill string 16 further includes additional components such as subs, pup joints, etc.
The BHA 18 includes at least a drill bit 20. Typical BHA's may also include additional components attached between the drill string 16 and the drill bit 20. Examples of additional BHA components include drill collars, stabilizers, measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tools, logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools, subs, hole enlargement devices (e.g., hole openers and reamers), jars, accelerators, thrusters, downhole motors, and rotary steerable systems. In certain BHA designs, the BHA may include a drill bit 20 or at least one secondary cutting structure or both.
In general, drilling tool assemblies 12 may include other drilling components and accessories, such as special valves, kelly cocks, blowout preventers, and safety valves. Additional components included in a drilling tool assembly 12 may be considered a part of the drill string 16 or a part of the BHA 18 depending on their locations in the drilling tool assembly 12.
The drill bit 20 in the BHA 18 may be any type of drill bit suitable for drilling earth formation. Two common types of drill bits used for drilling earth formations are fixed-cutter (or fixed-head) bits and roller cone bits.
In the drilling of oil and gas wells, concentric casing strings are installed and cemented in the borehole as drilling progresses to increasing depths. Each new casing string is supported within the previously installed casing string, thereby limiting the annular area available for the cementing operation. Further, as successively smaller diameter casing strings are suspended, the flow area for the production of oil and gas is reduced. Therefore, to increase the annular space for the cementing operation, and to increase the production flow area, it is often desirable to enlarge the borehole below the terminal end of the previously cased borehole. By enlarging the borehole, a larger annular area is provided for subsequently installing and cementing a larger casing string than would have been possible otherwise. Accordingly, by enlarging the borehole below the previously cased borehole, the bottom of the formation can be reached with comparatively larger diameter casing, thereby providing more flow area for the production of oil and gas.
Various methods have been devised for passing a drilling assembly through an existing cased borehole and enlarging the borehole below the casing. One such method is the use of an underreamer, which has basically two operative states—a closed or collapsed state, where the diameter of the tool is sufficiently small to allow the tool to pass through the existing cased borehole, and an open or partly expanded state, where one or more arms with cutters on the ends thereof extend from the body of the tool. In this latter position, the underreamer enlarges the borehole diameter as the tool is rotated and lowered in the borehole.
A “drilling type” underreamer is typically used in conjunction with a conventional pilot drill bit positioned below or downstream of the underreamer. The pilot bit can drill the borehole at the same time as the underreamer enlarges the borehole formed by the bit. Underreamers of this type usually have hinged arms with roller cone cutters attached thereto. Most of the prior art underreamers use swing out cutter arms that are pivoted at an end opposite the cutting end of the cutting arms, and the cutter arms are actuated by mechanical or hydraulic forces acting on the arms to extend or retract them. Typical examples of these types of underreamers are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,224,507; 3,425,500 and 4,055,226. In some designs, these pivoted arms tend to break during the drilling operation and must be removed or “fished” out of the borehole before the drilling operation can continue. The traditional underreamer tool typically has rotary cutter pocket recesses formed in the body for storing the retracted arms and roller cone cutters when the tool is in a closed state. The pocket recesses form large cavities in the underreamer body, which requires the removal of the structural metal forming the body, thereby compromising the strength and the hydraulic capacity of the underreamer. Accordingly, these prior art underreamers may not be capable of underreaming harder rock formations, or may have unacceptably slow rates of penetration, and they are not optimized for the high fluid flow rates required. The pocket recesses also tend to fill with debris from the drilling operation, which hinders collapsing of the arms. If the arms do not fully collapse, the drill string may easily hang up in the borehole when an attempt is made to remove the string from the borehole.
Recently, expandable underreamers having arms with blades that carry cutting elements have found increased use. Expandable underreamers allow a drilling operator to run the underreamer to a desired depth within a borehole, actuate the underreamer from a collapsed position to an expanded position, and enlarge a borehole to a desired diameter. Cutting elements of expandable underreamers may allow for underreaming, stabilizing, or backreaming, depending on the position and orientation of the cutting elements on the blades. Such underreaming may thereby enlarge a borehole by 15-40%, or greater, depending on the application and the specific underreamer design.
Typically, expandable underreamer design includes placing two blades in groups, referred to as a block, around a tubular body of the tool. A first blade, referred to as a leading blade absorbs a majority of the load, the leading load, as the tool contacts formation. A second blade, referred to as a trailing blade, and positioned rotationally behind the leading blade on the tubular body then absorbs a trailing load, which is less than the leading load. Thus, the cutting elements of the leading blade traditionally bear a majority of the load, while cutting elements of the trailing blade only absorb a majority of the load after failure of the cutting elements of the leading blade. Such design principles, resulting in unbalanced load conditions on adjacent blades, often result in premature failure of cutting elements, blades, and subsequently, the underreamer.
Accordingly, there exists a need for apparatuses and methods of designing secondary cutting structures having unique cutting element, blade, and block design.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a secondary cutting structure for use in a drilling assembly, the second cutting structure including a tubular body and a cutter block, extendable from the tubular body, the block including at least three rows of cutting elements.
In another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to drilling a borehole, the method including disposing a drilling tool assembly in the borehole, wherein the drilling tool assembly includes a primary cutting structure and a secondary cutting structure, and wherein the secondary cutting structure ahs a cutter block having at least three rows of cutting elements. The method also includes actuating the primary cutting structure, drilling a first portion of the borehole with the primary cutting structure, actuating the secondary cutting structure, and drilling a second portion of the borehole with both the primary and secondary cutting structures.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to secondary cutting structures for use on drilling tool assemblies. More specifically, embodiments disclosed herein relate to secondary cutting structures having a plurality of cutting element rows disposed on cutter blocks. More specifically still, embodiments disclosed herein relate to secondary cutting structures having more than two cutting element rows disposed on cutter blocks.
Referring now to
In the expanded position shown in
The drilling fluid flows along path 605, through ports 595 in lower retainer 590, along path 610 into the piston chamber 535. The differential pressure between the fluid in the flowbore 508 and the fluid in the borehole annulus 22 surrounding tool 500 causes the piston 530 to move axially upwardly from the position shown in
The underreamer tool 500 may be designed to remain concentrically disposed within the borehole. In particular, tool 500, in one embodiment, preferably includes three extendable arms 520 spaced apart circumferentially at the same axial location on the tool 510. In one embodiment, the circumferential spacing may be approximately 120 degrees apart. This three-arm design provides a full gauge underreaming tool 500 that remains centralized in the borehole. While a three-arm design is illustrated, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that in other embodiments, tool 510 may include different configurations of circumferentially spaced arms, for example, less than three-arms, four-arms, five-arms, or more than five-arm designs. Thus, in specific embodiments, the circumferential spacing of the arms may vary from the 120-degree spacing illustrated herein. For example, in alternate embodiments, the circumferential spacing may be 90 degrees, 60 degrees, or be spaced in non-equal increments. Accordingly, the secondary cutting structure designs disclosed herein may be used with any secondary cutting structure tools known in the art.
Referring to
As illustrated, second row 202 is located on cutter block 200 between first row 201 and third row 203. In certain embodiments, second row 202 is configured to actively engage formation while drilling. However, in alternate embodiments, second row 202 may be a passive row, and as such, may only engage formation after first row 201 experiences sufficient wear so that cutting elements 205 of second row 202 contact formation. In still other embodiments, first and second rows 201 and 202 may be active rows, such that both first and second rows 201 and 202 initially engage formation. In such an embodiment, third row 203 may be a passive row, and as such, only engage formation after either first or second rows 201 and/or 202 experience sufficient wear to allow cutting elements 205 of third row 203 to engage formation.
The above embodiments may thereby allow one or more of first, second, and third rows 201, 202, and/or 203 to define either active or passive rows. As such, one or more of first, second, or third rows 201, 202, or 203 may either initially contact formation, or may contact formation upon sufficient wear of one or more of the other rows. In still other embodiments, cutting elements 205 of first, second, and third rows 201, 202, and 203 may be disposed on cutter block 200, such that all cutting elements 205 of rows 201, 202, and 203 are configured to initially contact formation. Such embodiments may thereby allow first, second, and third rows 201, 202, and 203 to be active rows.
Cutting elements 205 may also be disposed in rows 201, 202, and 203 on cutter block 200 such that one or more of rows 201, 202, and 203 includes a redundant row. For example, in certain embodiments, cutting elements 205 of second row 202 may be disposed on cutter block 200 such that the cutting elements 205 occupy the same radial position as corresponding cutting elements 205 on first row 201. Such a configuration thereby provides a redundant cutting elements 205 arrangement, because as cutting elements 205 of first row 201 wear, cutting elements 205 of second row 202 will cut in substantially the same position. In other cutting elements 205 arrangements, third row 203 may provide a redundant cutting element 205 arrangement for second row 202, while in still other embodiments, cutting elements 205 in third row 203 may provide a redundant cutting element 205 arrangement for first for 201.
In a preferred embodiment, each cutting element 205 on cutter block 200 may be disposed in a unique position. A unique position refers to each cutting element 205 occupying a different radial position. Such a configuration may thereby increase formation coverage by the cutting structure during drilling, because each cutting element will occupy a unique location. Additionally, such a configuration may stabilize the cutting structure during drilling by decreasing lateral forces acting on individual cutting elements 205, thereby improving durability of the cutting structure.
As illustrated, first and third rows 201 and 203 may include full rows, while second row 202 includes a partial row. As such, flow channel 204 continues along the longitudinal length of cutter block 200. Flow channel 204 thereby provides a path for cuttings and fluids to flow past cutter block 200, thereby allowing for the evacuation of cuttings, as well as allowing fluid to lubricate and cool cutting elements 205. Flow channel 204 may be a recess formed in cutter block 200, and may continue along either the entire length of cutter block 200, or in other embodiment, along only a portion of cutter block 200. To prevent the flow from being impeded, a design parameter of an inner cutting element 206 in second row 202 may be optimized. As illustrated, inner cutting element 206 is inner with respect to second row 202, and includes the cutting element closest flow channel 204. For example, inner cutting elements 206 may be a different geometry, size, material, or may be oriented uniquely with respect to other cutting elements 205 in second row 202. In particular embodiments, inner cutting element 206 may be offset from other cutting elements 205 in second row 202, such that flow channel 204 continues along the longitudinal length of cutter block 200. In specific embodiments, flow channel 204 may be disposed between first for 201 and second row 202, second row 202 and third row 203, or between first row 201 and third row 203.
Referring to
As illustrated, stabilizer pad 208 includes a plurality of gauge inserts 209. In other embodiments, cutter block 200 may include additional design features, such as, for example, diamond enhanced inserts, wear compensation inserts, and/or depth of cut limiters. In still other embodiments, second row 202 may extend substantially the entire length of cutter block, as first and third rows 201 and 203 extend in the presently illustrated embodiment.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that secondary cutting structure designs as disclosed herein may include modification of individual cutting element design parameters. Examples of cutting element design parameters that may be adjusted may include back rake angles, side rake angles, and cutting elements exposure.
Referring to
In typical secondary cutting structure designs, large back rake angles (i.e., back rake angles greater than 20°) have been used to reduce cutting element failure by decreasing impact loading. However, in accordance with embodiments disclosed herein, decreasing back rake angle to less than 20°, thereby increasing the aggressiveness of the cut, may increase the stability of the secondary cutting structure. In certain embodiments, the back rake angle of one or more cutting elements may be in a range of about 0° to about 5°, about 5° to about 15°, or other ranges contained therein. Decreasing the back rake angle may actually decrease lateral vibrations experienced by the secondary cutting structure by, among other things, matching the aggressiveness of the secondary cutting structure to the aggressiveness of an associated drill bit or primary cutting structure. Allowing both the primary and the secondary cutting structure to cut formation with a similar aggressiveness may decrease vibrations of the entire drilling tool assembly, thereby increasing the stability of the drilling tool assembly. Examples of various back rake angles that may be used according to embodiments disclosed herein are discussed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/179,469, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Referring to
Referring to
In addition to modifying cutting element design parameters, the cutting structure on or between individual cutter blocks may be adjusted. As discussed above, downhole tools including secondary cutting structure may include multiple cutter blocks. For example, in certain embodiments, such downhole tools may include three cutter blocks disposed around the downhole tool in 120° increments. Cutting elements may be disposed on the cutter blocks in particular locations and/or orientations. For example, cutting elements may be arranged in single sets, plural sets, modified plural set, or spiral sets (forward or reverse), and the arrangements may vary across individual cutter blocks. Examples of various cutting element arrangements that may be used according to embodiments disclosed herein are discussed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/179,469, previously incorporated by reference.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As discussed above, in one embodiment, individual cutting elements may be arranged in rows on cutter blocks such that no two cutting elements occupy the same position, thereby resulting in a unique secondary cutting structure. In other embodiments, cutting elements may be disposed so that particular cutting elements are redundant. In a redundant cutting element arrangement, a second cutting element may be redundant with respect to a first cutting element, and the first and second cutting elements may be disposed on the same cutter block or on different cutter blocks. As such, various arrangements of cutting elements are within the scope of the present disclosure.
In still further embodiments, secondary cutting structure designs may include other various features to facilitate cutting and/or stabilization of the downhole tool during drilling. In certain embodiments, wear compensation inserts, such as diamond enhanced inserts, may be disposed on cutter blocks to help stabilize the downhole tool. In such embodiments, the wear compensation inserts may be disposed directly behind individual cutting elements in one or more of the plurality of rows, while in other embodiments, wear compensation inserts may be disposed offset from individual cutting elements in one or more of the plurality of rows.
In other embodiments, depth of cut limiters may be disposed behind individual cutting elements on one or more of the plurality of rows (e.g., between rows). Depth of cut limiters may include inserts with cutting capacity, such as back up cutters or diamond impregnated inserts with less exposure than primary cutting elements, or diamond enhanced inserts, tungsten carbide inserts, or other inserts that do not have a designated cutting capacity. While depth of cut limiters do not primarily engage formation during drilling, after wear of primary cutting elements, depth of cut limiters may engage the formation to protect the primary cutting elements from increased loads as a result of worn primary cutting elements. Depth of cut limiters are disposed behind primary cutting elements at a selected distance, such that depth of cut limiters may remain unengaged with formation until wear of primary cutting elements occurs.
After depth of cut limiters engage formation, due to wear of primary cutting elements, the load that would normally be placed upon primary cutting elements is redistributed, and per cutter force may be reduced. Because the per cutter force may be reduced, primary cutting elements may resist premature fracturing, thereby increasing the life of the primary cutting elements. Additionally, redistributing cutter forces may balance the overall weight distribution on the secondary cutting structure, thereby increasing the life of the tool. Furthermore, depth of cut limiters may provide dynamic support during wellbore enlargement, such that the per cutter load may be reduced during periods of high vibration, thereby protecting primary cutting elements and/or backup cutting elements (not illustrated). During a period of increased drill string bending and off-centering, depth of cut limiters may contact the wellbore, thereby decreasing lateral vibrations, reducing individual cutter force, and balancing torsional variation, so as to increase durability of the secondary cutting structure and/or individual cutting elements.
In certain embodiments, cutting elements may be disposed in square cutter pockets during manufacturing of the secondary cutting structure, thereby allow for three or more rows of cutting elements to be disposed on a single cutter block. Examples of cutter pockets that may be used according to embodiments of the present disclosure may be found in, for example, co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/174,928, published as U.S. Publication No. 2010/0276210, assigned to the assignee of the present disclosure, and hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Advantageously, embodiments of the present disclosure may allow for a secondary cutting structure that results in a balanced load distribution between individual cutting elements and/or cutter blocks. Additionally, the secondary cutting structure disclosed herein may provide for balanced forces along the entire drilling tool assembly by reducing lateral and torsional vibrations.
Also advantageously, in certain designs, the secondary cutting structure disclosed herein may particularly benefit drilling of heterogeneous formation. For example, if a primary cutting structure, such as a drill bit, is drilling a relatively soft formation, and a secondary cutting structure, such as a reamer, is drilling a relatively hard formation, the resultant lateral vibrations may damage one or more of the primary and/or secondary cutting structure. Because embodiments disclosed herein provide for additional rows of cutting elements on the secondary cutting structure, the secondary cutting structure may more effectively drill relatively hard formation while a primary cutting structure is drilling relatively soft formation, thereby decreasing lateral vibrations and preventing damage to either cutting structure. Additional benefits may also be achieved when the primary cutting structure is drilling relatively hard formation and the secondary cutting structure is drilling relatively soft formation.
Advantageously, embodiments disclosed herein may also provide a particular benefit when drilling transitional formations, wherein the mechanical properties vary widely. For example, drilling under pressurized sands and salts can cause excessive stress on cutting elements of a secondary cutting structure. Advantageously, embodiments disclosed herein may provide a more stable drilling environment, thereby resulting in an increased rate of penetration and superior bore hole quality.
While the present disclosure has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the disclosure as described herein. Accordingly, the scope of the disclosure should be limited only by the attached claims.
This application, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e) claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/174,854, filed May 1, 2009. That application is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2028910 | MacClatchie | Jan 1936 | A |
2846193 | Chadderdon | Aug 1958 | A |
2859943 | Chadderdon | Nov 1958 | A |
3224507 | Cordary et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3237705 | Williams, Jr. | Mar 1966 | A |
3425500 | Fuchs | Feb 1969 | A |
4055226 | Weber | Oct 1977 | A |
5899268 | Lynde et al. | May 1999 | A |
6732817 | Dewey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6920944 | Eppink et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7314099 | Dewey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7493971 | Nevlud et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7681666 | Radford et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7757787 | Mackay et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770664 | Laird et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7963348 | Laird et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20050145417 | Radford et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050241856 | Lassoie et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050274546 | Fanuel et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060113113 | Underwood et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070089912 | Eddison et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080105465 | Radford et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128175 | Radford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080251295 | Lassoie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100018779 | Makkar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2423546 | Aug 2006 | GB |
2453663 | Apr 2009 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Official Action issued in corresponding Eurasian Application No. 201070985; Dated Nov. 18, 2011 (3 pages). |
International Search Report issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2010/032664; Dated Jan. 24, 2011 (5 pages). |
Written Opinion issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2010/032664; Dated Jan. 24, 2011 (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100276201 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61174854 | May 2009 | US |