Secondary subscriber line override system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7561671
  • Patent Number
    7,561,671
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 23, 2006
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 14, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
A method and system of utilizing a secondary telephone line service, and in one embodiment encompasses analyzing a dialing sequence to convert from utilizing the secondary telephone line service to utilizing a primary telephone line service without the use of a manual override. By referencing a database of numbers, the present invention is able to determine if an outgoing service request is compatible with a preferred interface (e.g., the secondary interface), and, if not, to direct the outgoing service request to another interface (e.g., the primary interface, such as a POTS network).
Description
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention is directed to a method and system of utilizing a secondary telephone line service, and in one embodiment encompasses analyzing a dialing sequence to convert from utilizing the secondary telephone line service to utilizing a primary telephone line service without the use of a manual override.


2. Discussion of the Background


Most customers are used to utilizing the plain old telephone service (POTS). However, a number of new communications services are becoming available that increase the number of telephone line services available at residential and commercial premises. Two such services are Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) and Voice over IP (VoIP). Typically those services are unable to provide certain enhanced features (such as emergency dialing (911 services) and informational services (411)) because they are not connected to the POTS network that has traditionally been used to receive such calls. Known ISDN systems, therefore, include a manual switch that overrides the use of the ISDN system in favor of the POTS system (for emergency dialing or dialing in the case of a loss of power). However, such manual switches require physical access to the switch in order to perform the override function.


Emergency services are often time critical; accordingly, known systems include the ability to monitor phone calls to determine if a series of dialed digits represent an emergency call that requires extra processing. In one such system, when an emergency call is detected, the system flashes a porch light to better identify the house to the arriving emergency crew.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a monitoring system for calls made on a secondary telephone line service to determine if the calls are compatible with the services available on the secondary telephone line. In one such embodiment, the present invention monitors the digits dialed to determine if the outgoing call would more appropriately be directed to the POTS network. If so, the system of the present invention automatically switches from the secondary telephone line service to the POTS network without user intervention. If not, the secondary interface (e.g., a VoIP connection over telephone line or cable) is used.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a secondary telephone line service box according to the present invention; and



FIG. 2 is flow of a dialed digit processor that determines the destination telephone line of the call.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As secondary telephone line services become more prevalent, users are going to utilize those services as if they were POTS services. That means that cordless telephones will be connected to such services and users will expect to be able walk around with the cordless phone without thinking about the fact that the cordless phone base station is connected to a non-POTS connection. According, in the case of an emergency (e.g., the cordless phone user falls and is injured), the user is unlikely to think about pressing a manual override button to switch from a secondary line to the primary line. In fact, if a user has the cordless phone handset, that user is likely to be very far from the base station where such an override button might exist. Similarly, non-residents of the house or guests of the company would likely be unaware of the existence of the manual override and would be unable to utilize the phone for emergency services. There is, therefore, a need for an automatic switching system that converts from utilizing a secondary telephone line service to the POTS network without the need for user intervention.


Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views, FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a secondary telephone line service box 100 according to the present invention. A telephone line from a wall mounted telephone or a cordless telephone base station is connected to the telephone line connector 110. When a user takes the phone off-hook, the call processor 120 monitors the DTMF tones generated by the phone handset and determines if the number dialed corresponds to a telephone entry that should be directed to the POTS network or the secondary line network.


As shown in FIG. 2, the call processor 120 collects digits as dialed, and determines if the digits so far constitute a match of any number in the database of the box 100. If a total match occurs (e.g., the user has dialed all three digits of 911 in order), then the call processor 120 switches the outgoing call to the POTS interface 130 and re-dials the captured digits (thereby connecting the call to the desired service). The call processor can optionally temporarily block the return sound path to the user so that the user does not hear the digits being redialed, which may otherwise confuse the user.


If the call processor 120 determines that a total match has not yet occurred, then the call processor 120 determines if there are any remaining numbers in the database of numbers that might still be matched. For example, if the user has only dialed 9 so far, then the number 911 is still a possible match. In the case of such a partial match, control passes to the first step again to collect another digit.


On the other hand, if no number exists in the database that could still be a possible match, the box 100 may safely direct the call to the secondary telephone line interface 140. In doing so, the call processor may still have to collect additional digits to have the complete number, but at the end of the dialing sequence, the call processor can connect (e.g., via IP) to the remote call handler (e.g., a VoIP gateway that will complete the call).


The database of numbers may, in fact, be dynamically configurable. Utilizing communications services (e.g., IP), the remote call handler can contact the box 100 and identify numbers to be added or removed from the database. This may be helpful in environments where the remote call handler will eventually perform emergency services without the need for the POTS network, but where such service is not currently available. This would prevent all the boxes from having to be replaced or manually reconfigured in order to update the database 150. (The database could likewise be updated via the POTS interface 130 or via a local data connection (e.g., RS-232, Ethernet, wireless, keyboard or mouse). The database need not be a file-based database and may instead be any form of non-volatile memory.


Utilizing the box 100, the remote call handler may also be able to dynamically update which interface is used based on call prefixes. For example, if the remote call handler cannot route calls directed to a particular country, rather than forcing the user to remember that, the remote call handler would simply inform the box 100 that the database 150 should be updated to include the dialing prefix corresponding to that country (e.g., 01133 for calls to France from the US). In the same way, if the remote call handler was temporarily unable to provide services, then the database could be updated to direct all calls to the POTS interface 130.


The database 150 can also be directed to include call control information based on other conditions (e.g., the time of day). For example, the database may include a record which specifies that 911 services are to be directed to the POTS interface 130 from 5 PM until 9 AM. That is, the remote call handler will actually provide emergency services between 9 AM and 5 PM. Similarly, the database 150 may include an entry that indicates that calls to France should be placed to the POTS interface 130 at certain hours.


The database 150 may also contain call control information that identifies whether, in the presence of an error in connecting to the remote call handler, the box 100 should switch to the POTS interface 130 and automatically redial. Since the box 100 includes the ability to buffer the digits dialed, the box can automatically redial the number that did not complete.


The call processor 120 may also provide local called number translation. For example, the remote call handler may not be able to provide 800 services. Accordingly, the database would include an entry for numbers beginning with 800. However, based on the user's location, the database may also include a translation entry for the number 800-555-1212. For example, the database entry for that number indicates that the number can be translated to a non-800 number (e.g., 973-555-1212) that can be connected via the secondary interface 140. In this way, the database can override the normal use of the POTS interface 130 and increase the use of the secondary interface 140. (As shown above, the processing of FIG. 2 looks for the longest matching entry in the database, and does not indicate a total match until all possible longer numbers have been checked.) Just as local number translation can be performed, the box 100 can perform number translation remotely with the help of the remote call processor. If the remote call processor gets a connection request that it cannot handle but which the user's POTS service could, the remote call handler can send back the dialing sequence that the box 100 should use over the POTS interface 130.


Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. For example, in the case of power loss, the box 100 may automatically switch to the POTS interface 130. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the present invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system for routing a call between first and second voice telephone line interfaces depending on a service to be connected to, the system comprising: a telephone digit detector for detecting and buffering a series of digits received from a telephone line connector;a telephone number comparator for determining if the buffered series of digits matches a stored emergency telephone number; anda telephone line switch for directing an outgoing call to (1 ) the first voice telephone line interface if the telephone number comparator indicates that the buffered series of digits matches the stored emergency telephone number and (2 ) the second voice telephone line interface if the telephone number comparator indicates that the buffered series of digits does not match the stored emergency telephone number.
  • 2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first voice telephone line interface comprises a POTS interface.
  • 3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the emergency number comprises 911.
  • 4. The system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the second voice telephone line interface comprises a Voice-over-IP interface.
  • 5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the service to be connected to is not currently available on the second voice telephone line interface.
  • 6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second voice telephone line interface comprises a Voice-over-IP interface.
  • 7. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first voice telephone line interface comprises a POTS interface, wherein the emergency number comprises 911, andwherein the second voice telephone line interface comprises a Voice-over-IP interface.
  • 8. A method for routing a call between first and second voice telephone line interfaces depending on a service to be connected to, the method comprising: detecting and buffering a series of digits received from a telephone line connector;determining if the buffered series of digits matches a stored emergency telephone number; anddirecting an outgoing call to (1 ) the first voice telephone line interface if the buffered series of digits matches the stored emergency telephone number and (2 ) the second voice telephone line interface if the buffered series of digits does not match the stored emergency telephone number.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the first voice telephone line interface comprises a POTS interface.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the second voice telephone line interface comprises a Voice-over-IP interface.
  • 11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the service to be connected to is not currently available on the second voice telephone line interface.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the emergency number comprises 911.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the second telephone line interface comprises a Voice-over-IP interface.
  • 14. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the first voice telephone line interface comprises a POTS interface, wherein the emergency number comprises 911 , andwherein the second voice telephone line interface comprises a Voice-over-IP interface.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/682,927 filed Nov. 1, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,127,043, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (98)
Number Name Date Kind
4104486 Martin Aug 1978 A
4122308 Weinberger et al. Oct 1978 A
4136262 Clark, Jr. Jan 1979 A
4198545 Haist et al. Apr 1980 A
4209668 Weinberger et al. Jun 1980 A
4226360 Simjian Oct 1980 A
4332982 Thomas Jun 1982 A
4410765 Hestad et al. Oct 1983 A
4439636 Newkirk Mar 1984 A
4468529 Samuel et al. Aug 1984 A
4521857 Reynolds Jun 1985 A
4585904 Mincone Apr 1986 A
4594477 Noirot Jun 1986 A
4656657 Hunsicker Apr 1987 A
4751728 Treat Jun 1988 A
4751729 Coleman Jun 1988 A
4813065 Segala Mar 1989 A
4829554 Barnes et al. May 1989 A
4878236 Ray et al. Oct 1989 A
4878240 Lin et al. Oct 1989 A
4888822 Weinberger et al. Dec 1989 A
4905273 Gordon et al. Feb 1990 A
4935951 Robinson et al. Jun 1990 A
4935956 Hellwarth Jun 1990 A
4989230 Gillig et al. Jan 1991 A
5003584 Benyacar Mar 1991 A
5012507 Leighton et al. Apr 1991 A
5163042 Ochiai Nov 1992 A
5173933 Jabs et al. Dec 1992 A
5187710 Chau Feb 1993 A
5204895 Yoshiura Apr 1993 A
5303297 Hillis Apr 1994 A
5319701 Hird et al. Jun 1994 A
RE34677 Ray et al. Jul 1994 E
5341374 Lewen et al. Aug 1994 A
5425085 Weinberger et al. Jun 1995 A
5448635 Biehl et al. Sep 1995 A
5481592 Azer Jan 1996 A
5488653 Dimolitsas et al. Jan 1996 A
5519769 Weinberger et al. May 1996 A
5530736 Comer et al. Jun 1996 A
5577264 Tuohino Nov 1996 A
5606595 Ejzak Feb 1997 A
5606602 Johnson et al. Feb 1997 A
5666428 Farinelli et al. Sep 1997 A
5708422 Blonder et al. Jan 1998 A
5754640 Sosnowski May 1998 A
5802502 Gell et al. Sep 1998 A
5805669 Bingel et al. Sep 1998 A
5825865 Oberlander et al. Oct 1998 A
5838785 Hirata Nov 1998 A
5845205 Alanara et al. Dec 1998 A
5862203 Wulkan et al. Jan 1999 A
5867495 Elliott et al. Feb 1999 A
5875244 Nagato Feb 1999 A
5889856 O'Toole et al. Mar 1999 A
5894595 Foladare et al. Apr 1999 A
5905736 Ronen et al. May 1999 A
5907548 Bernstein May 1999 A
5909445 Schneider Jun 1999 A
5910946 Csapo Jun 1999 A
5930708 Stewart et al. Jul 1999 A
5930727 Henry, Jr. Jul 1999 A
5943404 Sansom et al. Aug 1999 A
5960061 Fahie et al. Sep 1999 A
5966658 Kennedy, III et al. Oct 1999 A
5978456 Takeuchi et al. Nov 1999 A
5995830 Amin et al. Nov 1999 A
6005925 Johnson et al. Dec 1999 A
6012142 Dokic et al. Jan 2000 A
6029047 Ishida et al. Feb 2000 A
6038440 Wu Mar 2000 A
6064882 Coyne et al. May 2000 A
6067452 Alexander May 2000 A
6069890 White et al. May 2000 A
6073003 Nilssen Jun 2000 A
6091721 Greenberg et al. Jul 2000 A
6137877 Robin et al. Oct 2000 A
6141341 Jones et al. Oct 2000 A
6167278 Nilssen Dec 2000 A
6185413 Mueller et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195553 Claffery et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198920 Doviak et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219525 Imai et al. Apr 2001 B1
6269157 Coyle Jul 2001 B1
6292662 Ziv et al. Sep 2001 B1
6332073 Nilsson et al. Dec 2001 B1
6363065 Thornton et al. Mar 2002 B1
6373929 Johnson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6418324 Doviak et al. Jul 2002 B1
6504831 Greenwood et al. Jan 2003 B1
6614780 Hakim et al. Sep 2003 B2
6683870 Archer Jan 2004 B1
6714644 Cohn et al. Mar 2004 B1
6741870 Holmstrom et al. May 2004 B1
6751210 Shaffer et al. Jun 2004 B1
6778656 Stevens et al. Aug 2004 B1
6826405 Doviak et al. Nov 2004 B2
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060140352 A1 Jun 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09682927 Nov 2001 US
Child 11336916 US