This application is related to co-pendinga continuation of U.S. utility patent application entitled “System And Method for Sectional E-Mail Transmission” filed on Aug. 19, 2004 and accorded Ser. No. 10/922,249, which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
This invention is related to the field of electrical computers and digital processing systems to transfer data via one or more communications media in general, and specifically, to a demand-based messaging system for simultaneous transmission of sections of an email to different recipients without the need to send separate emails.
A demand-based messaging system is any communication system that enables a person to exchange electronic messages with another person over a communications media. Demand-based messaging systems typically comprise a network of data processing machines and a messaging program operable on at least one machine to transfer electronic messages over the network to one or more of the other machines. Electronic messages typically are composed of a variety of information, including message data and transmission data. As those terms are used here, “message data” generally refers to the substance of the message, such as text or images, while “transmission data” generally refers to the information required to deliver or respond to the message, such as the correspondents' electronic addresses. Electronic messages also may include status information, such as the time and date that the message was composed, sent, or received.
LOTUS NOTES, MOZILLA, and MICROSOFT OUTLOOK are exemplary messaging programs that enable users to exchange electronic mail messages through networked computers. Instant messaging (“IM”) programs such as MSN MESSENGER and YAHOO! MESSENGER, which have gained popularity in recent years, exemplify another embodiment of messaging programs that enable users to exchange electronic messages in real-time through networked computers.
Electronic mail messages are often sent to a group of recipients. Such recipients fall into three categories: the addressee, the copied recipient, and the recipient who receives a blind copy. The addressee receives the message and sees who has been copied. The recipient who has been copied receives the message and knows to whom the message was directed. The recipient who receives a blind copy receives the message, knows to whom the message was directed and who received copies, but the addressee and the copied recipients do not know the identity of the blind copy recipient.
An originator may want to send a bulk message to all recipients, but a small section unique to each individual recipient. For example, a user may send instructions to coordinate an event, with a unique time assignment to each recipient who receives the email. Sometimes a need arises to vary the message sent to one or more recipients. A sender of an email may not want its entire contents to go to all recipients. Normally, the sender would have to break up the email and send it in segments. Having to send multiple emails wastes the sender's time as well as wastes disk space on the server and bandwidth on the network.
An originator may desire to send an email where only a portion is intended for all recipients, another portion only for select recipients, and a final portion that is not to be sent to certain other recipients. Perhaps the material sent to the select recipients is confidential. The material not to be sent to some recipients may be attachments that are already available to them on their server.
An originator may desire to send an email containing a section of text that is of common interest to all the recipients followed by text that is specific to each recipient. Perhaps the specific text is the recipient's new password. The desire is to send the specific text only to the intended recipient. The common text would go to all recipients.
The need to vary the message can arise with a group of recipients in one status grouping or in more than one status grouping. For example, the sender may want to provide additional information for a recipient who is less familiar with the context of the message than other recipients. Likewise, a user may want to send special instructions to a recipient such as a reminder to a blind copy recipient not to reply because the user does not want the other recipients to know he included the blind copy recipient. Presently, varying message text requires sending separate messages.
Sending separate messages requires time to create the separate electronic messages and to copy and paste the content of the separate messages. Since the messages are sent separately, some of the reply messages will not go to all of the recipients. In particular, reply messages will not go to all recipients when the reply comes from a message sent only to a subset of the overall group of recipients. In order to solve this problem, the sender could include the subset of recipients on both emails. In that event, the subset of recipients receives redundant emails. Sending multiple electronic messages consumes more network bandwidth and storage space. Increased consumption of network bandwidth and storage space increases costs. Costs further increase when the email is large or has large attachments. If an originator of an email had an easy way to segment a single email, the originator would save time as well as network disk storage space and bandwidth. Therefore, a need exits for an improved electronic messaging system that allows transmission of e-mail segments to different recipients.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,118,856 discloses receiving an email and automatically forwarding it to a remote device. The forwarding is done by an act of the recipient, not the sender. The forwarding may be limited to a selective portion of the original email. This patent is primarily concerned with forwarding received emails to a cell phone or a text pager. The forwarding is based on the content of the message. For example, the forwarding may be done based on a particular sender.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,446,118 discloses a system for receiving email while away from your computer without having to subscribe to a “commercial, public network” such as SkyTel. A portion of the email, such as the header, may be all that is transmitted to an email notification device. Other, limited information, like message size and when the message was originally received, may also be transmitted.
The invention that meets the needs described above is a process of segmenting a single email so that portions of it may be directed to or away from select recipients. The sender highlights portions of the email and right clicks (or key command, button, or menu item) and selects an option to select recipients. The operator interface then provides the sender with the option of selecting recipients from their address book or the server's address book. To speed the process along, the sender may select those already on the To, Cc, or Bcc distribution lists. The sender then selects whether those chosen will receive the highlighted portion or if they will be excluded from receiving it. Lastly, the sender will have the option of providing text that is unique to each of the selected groups.
These and other objects of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be implemented in a variety of software and hardware configurations. It is believed, however, that the invention is described best as a computer program that configures and enables one or more general-purpose computers to implement the novel aspects of the invention.
As used herein, “attachment” means a file that is transmitted with an email that is not part of any messages in the email itself.
As used herein, “blind copy recipient” means a recipient whose identity is not to be disclosed to other recipients of the same message.
As used herein, “computer” means a machine having a processor, a memory, and an operating system, capable of interaction with a user or other computer, and shall include without limitation desktop computers, notebook computers, tablet computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), servers, handheld computers, and similar devices.
As used herein, “copy recipient” means a recipient for whom a message is not primarily intended but who is included in the distribution list to be kept informed, and may be synonymous with secondary recipient.
As used herein, “electronic mail” or “email” means direct user-to-user transmission of messages between user computers over a network.
As used herein, “electronic messaging” means the creation, transfer, storage, and retrieval of text, graphics, images, or voice data by electronic means.
As used herein, “header” means the portion of a message that contains control information for the message.
As used herein, “recipient” means anyone or any location that receives data, and a user of a demand-based messaging system to whom a message is addressed.
As used herein, “section” means a message or a portion of a message.
As used herein, “message” means an electronic mail message transmitted over a network.
The internal configuration of a computer, including connection and orientation of the processor, memory, and input/output devices, is well known in the art.
In alternative embodiments, SEP 210 can be stored in the memory of other computers. Storing SEP 210, in the memory of other computers allows the processor workload to be distributed across a plurality of processors instead of a single processor. Further configurations of SEP 210 across various multiple memories and processors are known by persons skilled in the art.
Originator 310 normally would create one email to the customers shown in recipient addressee section 322 and create another email to the copy recipient addressees shown in copy recipient address section 324. However, SEP 210 allows originator 310 to create one email and to sectionalize that one email in the following manner.
In order to sectionalize the email, originator 310 highlights first message section 332 and, using a mouse, right clicks (or such other means known to person skilled in the art such as a key command button or menu item) to receive a display of options from which the originator selects “select recipients.” Upon selecting “select recipients” a dialog box appears asking the originator to identify who will receive the section. Referring to
Referring to
Alternatively, upon selection of select recipients window 410 from dialog box 400, a list of all recipients in the recipient address section 322, copy recipient address section 324, and blind copy recipient address section 326 may be presented so that the user can select recipients using drag and drop, highlighting, checkboxes, add/remove buttons, and other means known to persons skilled in the art.
Activation of Select from Address Book 540 means that originator 310's address book will be displayed so that originator 310 can select addressees to receive the highlighted portion of the e-mail, and those selected will be the only ones that will receive the highlighted portion. SEP 210 may be configured to display the user's local or server address book. In addition, originator 310 may add recipients from the address book to names selected from other options in window 500. Activation of Select User Defined 550 means that an entry field window, such as Enter recipient window 600 will appear. Referring to
Once originator 310 makes selections, the email appears in its entirety to originator 310, but the recipients will only receive and be able to read those portions designated for them to receive and read. Originator 310 may review the e-mail by passing the cursor over the various portions of the email. For example, passing the cursor over second section 334, causes second recipient window 700 (see
Since CSEP 220 sends the email to the server with instructions on segmenting the email, and SSEP 240 then segments the email according to the instructions in the header and sends the separate emails to the respective recipients, network bandwidth and storage are conserved.
Once section information has been inserted into the header of the email, a user may hover the mouse over a given section of email and obtain information regarding who received or did not receive that section.
In an additional embodiment, SEP 210 may he configured to block a recipient from replying or forwarding an email that was sent only to that recipient. Such an embodiment may prevent accidental disclosure of information intended only for specified recipients.
In an alternate embodiment, SEP 210 may be employed only in the client computer. In such an embodiment, the client computer segments the email and sends separate emails as provided by the originator. Such an embodiment does not save bandwidth and disk storage space, but it does save the originator's time by automatically preparing the separate messages. In addition, such an embodiment allows for a pure client implementation, at reduced functionality, without requiring a server implementation.
A preferred form of the invention has been shown in the drawings and described above, but variations in the preferred form will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The preceding description is for illustration purposes only, and the invention should not be construed as limited to the specific form shown and described. The scope of the invention should be limited only by the language of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5694616 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5754778 | Shoujima | May 1998 | A |
5805830 | Reese et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5864684 | Nielsen | Jan 1999 | A |
5878230 | Weber et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893914 | Clapp | Apr 1999 | A |
5995597 | Woltz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6044395 | Costales et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052709 | Paul | Apr 2000 | A |
6061698 | Chadha et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074772 | Hofer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101532 | Horibe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118856 | Paarsmarkt et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122632 | Botts et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6163809 | Buckley | Dec 2000 | A |
6182059 | Angotti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192396 | Kohler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205471 | Gilchrist et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246992 | Brown | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247045 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275848 | Arnold | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275850 | Beyda et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289372 | Vyaznikov | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308179 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324569 | Ogilvie et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332156 | Cho et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370567 | Ouchi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389475 | Speakman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393423 | Goedken | May 2002 | B1 |
6405243 | Nielsen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415290 | Botts et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424828 | Collins et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424996 | Killcommons et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427076 | Skog | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6446118 | Gottlieb | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449635 | Tilden, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453337 | Miller et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6457045 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476930 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480711 | Guedalia | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480885 | Olivier | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484196 | Maurille | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496849 | Hanson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496853 | Klein | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505233 | Hanson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507865 | Hanson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529942 | Gilbert | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549957 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553425 | Shah et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563912 | Dorfman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6563913 | Kaghazian | May 2003 | B1 |
6574671 | Haynes | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578025 | Pollack et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584564 | Olkin et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6615241 | Miller et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643684 | Malkin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668325 | Collberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687741 | Ramaley et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704772 | Ahmed et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6705381 | Huang | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721785 | Raghunandan | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735741 | Pannu | May 2004 | B1 |
6745197 | McDonald | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751453 | Schemers et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6775689 | Raghunandan | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789107 | Bates et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802067 | Camp et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816868 | Shimizu | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820081 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823368 | Ullmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826596 | Suzuki | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6886030 | Easterbrook et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6925605 | Bates et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6970907 | Ullmann et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6972861 | van Zee et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993573 | Hunter | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7039678 | Halahmi et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7062536 | Fellenstein et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7103634 | Ullmann et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107518 | Ramaley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111046 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130885 | Chandra et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130887 | Goldberg | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136180 | Utsunomiya | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136897 | Raghunandan | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7155481 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7219129 | Weissman | May 2007 | B2 |
7222156 | Gupta et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7243125 | Newman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257610 | Lai et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275214 | Itoh | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7305381 | Poppink et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7305430 | Choubey et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305436 | Willis | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328241 | Ribak et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7363490 | Paulsen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375835 | Hull et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7383305 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7596603 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7801960 | Hockey | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7844676 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7890593 | Chen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8131806 | Chen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8214444 | Prahlad et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8631077 | Chen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010047389 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019827 | Shiman et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029247 | Kawamoto | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046250 | Nassiri | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052923 | Anderson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097414 | Utsunomiya | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097850 | Schemers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099777 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107930 | Itoh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120702 | Schiavone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122411 | Zimmerman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138582 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138586 | Paleiov et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188683 | Lyttle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193986 | Schirris | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014490 | Bates et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018731 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030061111 | Dutta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070077 | Redlich et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088704 | Mertama et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093483 | Allen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097414 | Cabello | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101412 | Eid | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115271 | Weissman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030195933 | Curren et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200272 | Campise et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030223554 | Zhang | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006599 | Bates et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024810 | Choubey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034688 | Dunn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064515 | Hockey | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068544 | Malik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073616 | Fellenstein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078452 | Jamieson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139480 | Delpuch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141004 | Cabezas et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040221295 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260756 | Forstall et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021637 | Cox | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038804 | Shimizu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039048 | Tosey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060372 | DeBettencourt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080853 | Kelley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108351 | Naick et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138109 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138133 | Voticky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165740 | Kerr et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050223061 | Auerbach et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267944 | Little | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278426 | Blagg | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289113 | Bookstaff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020668 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031324 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041624 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041625 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060168044 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070036301 | Voticky et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070110103 | Zimmerman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143431 | Prahlad et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070214216 | Carrer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070300153 | Newman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080281823 | Chen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012984 | Ravid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090276732 | Dervan | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319506 | Ngan | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017408 | Chen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017481 | Chen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070584 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077323 | Hunter | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106788 | Lynn et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110072097 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Selective Receipt of Document Elements in an Electronic Mail System”, International Business Machines Corporation, Kenneth Mason Publications Ltd., Jan. 2000, p. 1. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230 dated Jul. 9, 2009. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230 dated Dec. 8, 2008. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230 dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/032,850 dated Dec. 1, 2008. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/032,850 dated May 13, 2008. |
USPTO office action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,249 dated Apr. 17, 2008. |
USPTO final office action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,249 dated Sep. 17, 2008. |
USPTO final office action for U.S. Appl. 10/922,249 dated Dec. 11, 2008. |
USPTO notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,249 dated Jun. 2, 2009. |
USPTO notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. 11/032,850 dated Apr. 17, 2009. |
“How to sort addresses by last name in Outlook Express,” Microsoft Outlook 2003, dated Jan. 29, 2007, 1 page. Accessed Jun. 20, 2007, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/282253/en-us. |
“Sort a Range,” Microsoft Excel 2003, copyright 2007, 3 pages. Accessed Jun. 20, 2007, http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel/HP052029541033.aspx?pid=CH062527971033&mode=print. |
“Sort your Inbox by using multiple columns”, Microsoft Outlook 2003, copyright 2007, 1 page. Accessed Jun. 20, 2007 from office.microsoft.com. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 15, 2003, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 09/589,140 6 pages. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 13, 2003, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 09/589,140 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230, dated Sep. 5, 2013, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230, dated Oct. 2, 2012, 22 pages. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230, dated Feb. 1, 2008, 12 pages. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/897,230, dated Dec. 18, 2008, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,280, dated Oct. 4, 2010, 19 pages. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,280, dated May 4, 2010, 8 pages |
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,283, dated Oct. 4, 2011, 32 pages. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,283, dated Apr. 12, 2011, 37 pages. |
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,300, dated Dec. 28, 2010, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,300, dated May 3, 2011, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,300, dated Oct. 28, 2011, 12 pages. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,300, dated Jul. 2, 2010, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 1, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/209,573, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Nov. 25, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/209,573, 13 pages. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 15, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/209,573, 12 pages. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 22, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/209,573, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/880,729, dated Dec. 10, 2008, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/880,729, dated May 21, 2009, 16 pages. |
Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/880,729, dated Jul. 18, 2008, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 9, 2004, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,951, 9 pages. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2003, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,951, 13 pages. |
Jackman, “Use These Five Tips to Control How Outlook 2003 Displays E-Mail”, Sep. 22, 2004, 6 pages. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/use-these-five-tips-to-help-control-how-outlook-2003-displays-e-mail/5287013. |
Courter et al., “Getting the Most Out of Outlook: Rules, Calendars, Views,” TRIAD Consulting, 2003 IAAP International Convention, Jul. 2003, 9 pages. http://www.triadconsulting.com/events/IAAP/2003—Convention/. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10922249 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 12175280 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12175280 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 13767476 | US |