1. Field of the Invention
The application relates to doors and their methods of manufacturing.
2. Background of the Related Art
Custom overhead doors are typically fabricated with a flush door as a base door. On the base door, hand milled trim boards are fitted to the specified design. While this produces a beautiful product with infinite designs and sizes, it is very time consuming and therefore expensive.
One alternative to the above mentioned door fabrication process is to laminate a sheet of material over the frame. Such a sheet material is typically pre-formed into a design using platens/dies. The benefits of this method is that it is less expensive than assembling hand milled trim.
One problem with using dies and platens is that variations in designs and sizes are limited due to related equipment and storage costs. That is, for designs based on customer-specific tastes, which may be unique, dies or platens must be fabricated or obtained. Once used, the dies or platens would need to be stored for the unlikely event that another customer would have the same design for the same sized door.
More recently, methods have been introduced which attempt to fabricate a sectional-overhead door, such as a garage door, with the use of a CNC (Computer Numerical Control) milling machine. Utilizing a CNC bypasses the need to use dies and platens for creating door designs. However, such'methods, as will be explored, fail to provide a sectional-overhead door having the characteristics and benefits of the disclosed embodiments of the invention.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0172914 to Barbir, published on May 10, 2007, incorporated herein by reference, discloses a “Seamless Door and Method of Manufacture.” The door is comprised of an MDF (medium density fiber board) core suitable for routering without chip-out, and the core thickness is between 1⅜″ and 2¼″ thick. The door also includes vertical members, a ⅛″ veneer which covers the front and back of the door, and edging which covers the peripheral edges of the door. Once the door is formed, the '914 publication teaches carving a predetermined profile into the front face, back face, or both with a CNC.
One problem associated with the '911 publication is the depth of the veneer. Typical panels in a multi-paneled door are more than one half of an inch deep. By using a CNC on a ⅛′ veneer, router bits will necessarily drill in to the core material, exposing edges between the veneer and the core. Moisture and typical and heating and cooling cycles in an outdoor environment will cause the veneer to pull away from the core. Furthermore, using an MDF core as compared to a foam insulated core will provide the door with relatively poor insulating characteristics and significant extra weight.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,185,468 to Clark et al, granted on Mar. 6, 2007, discloses a “Multi-Layered Fire Door And Method For Making The Same.” Similar to the '914 publication, the '468 publication discloses various layers, including outer veneers which are about ⅛″ thick. As acknowledged in the reference, at column 7, lines 30-50, panels comprised of grooves which are at least a half inch deep could not be manufactured into such doors without penetrating multiple layers of the door.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,055 to Crittenden, granted on Jul. 21, 1998, incorporated herein by reference, discloses a “Door Apparatus and Method of Making Door.” The disclosed method comprises the asymmetrical removal of material from the inner portion of the door, inwardly from the perimeter door frame, on both sides of the door. The result is relatively thin webs between relatively thick door portions, as illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 of the publication. This provides a serpentine configuration which expands and contracts in response to temperature and/or humidity conditions.
As with the '914 publication, the core of the door in the '055 publication is the material which is routed. Therefore, the core is wood and not an insulating product. Moreover, in the area of the thin webs, the wood is very thin, further decreasing the insulation characteristics of the door.
Another issue with a door manufactured according to the '055 publication is that the thin webs form weak areas in the door. Those areas will fracture under relatively light impact as compared with the rest of the door. Such weakness would be problematic as garage door designs are typically subjected to impacts during a normal lifespan.
In view of the options discussed above, the disclosed door and method for manufacturing the same allows a door manufacturer to more easily fabricate custom sectional overhead doors. The disclosed door and method for manufacturing the same eliminates the expense of having a skilled craftsman hand mill and fit each trim board. The disclosed door and method for manufacturing the same enables fabricating infinite designs and infinite sizes without the constraint of being limited to preset, expensive platens/dies for fabrication. The disclosed door and method for manufacturing the same provides for routing typical depth panels into a door without having to penetrate various layers of the door. The disclosed door and method for manufacturing the same provides a solid core of insulation which is not subject to routing which decreases thermal resistively of the door.
In order that the manner in which the above recited objectives are realized, a particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that the drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
The face panel 12 is fabricated from one or more exterior grade medium-density fiberboard (MDF) panels. The benefits of MDF is its consistent strength and its ability to be routed without chip-out due to its isotropic construction. It is to be appreciated that other exterior grade sheet materials suitable for routering could be used in place of MDF while falling within the scope of the disclosed embodiments. For example, high density urethane (HDU) or PVC could be used.
The MDF panels are milled, via a CNC controlled router, to include window openings as well as the typical multi-raised or inset panel design found on a standard garage door. The result is a unitary, i.e., substantially single piece, panel having windows and other designs milled into the panel. As can be appreciated, router bits would need to be interchanged to create straight cuts, e.g., for windows, or groove cuts, e.g., for the raised or inset multi-panel designs.
MDF is typically obtained in sizes of four feet wide by eight feet tall, and a garage door is typically seven to eight feet tall. However, a garage door is typically eight to nine feet wide for a single door or sixteen feed wide for a double door. Accordingly, plural MDF panels are milled with the CNC to obtain a full garage door.
For example,
Alternatively, in a garage door 28 with a tri-fold appearance, three MDF panels 30, 32, 34 may be utilized. Utilizing three panels creates two widthwise seams 36, 38 between widthwise exterior right and left edges 40, 42, of the door. The widthwise kerfs could also be created with a saw or with the CNC, if necessary.
While two panels are particularly well suited for an eight foot wide door, and three panels are particularly well suited for a twelve food door, other widths will be required as by design. For such circumstances, when complete door panels cannot be utilized, spacers strips or filler strips can be placed on the outside edges 20, 22 of the door as well as between the door panels 24, 26. The seams created between around the panels can be wood filled to create a smooth, seamless finish.
The thickness of the face panels enables a router bit to mill the depth of a CNC programmed unitary design, such as a multi-panel raised design, without passing completely through the face panel 12. For example, designs illustrated in
It is to be appreciated that the full depth of the face panel is routed out when the unitary design is an inset multi-panel design. In such circumstances, the core members, such as the front face of the front stabilizing panel, discussed below, provides the face surface of the inset panel. However, the stabilizing panel is not milled in this process.
The sectional-overhead, as with typical garage doors, is comprised of plural sections. Each section is width-wise the same as the width of the overall garage door, and height-wise shorter than the door. A typical seven foot tall garage door could be divided into three segments and an eight foot tall garage door could be divided into four segments.
Accordingly, each garage door design includes a bottom segment, a top segment, and one or two intermediate segments. The top segment is typically about 28″ to allow for proper cutting of window lites and installation of a window glass. The remaining height is then equally distributed among the remaining segments.
At intersecting seams between adjacent segment members, as illustrated in
The tongue and groove members are made from wood, such as finished cedar, which is a highly rated weather resistant wood. The length of the tongue and groove members is the width of the garage door. The nominal width of the tongue and groove members is one and one-quarter inches. This is the thickness of the center Structure of the core, disclosed below.
The nominal height of the tongue and groove members is about nine-sixteenths of an inch. This nominal height enables cutting about a one-quarter inch rise in the tongue and a five-sixteenths of an inch rise in the groove, both of which can be cut from a router or shaper. The difference in the tongue and groove dimensions prevents binding as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
The bottom section of the sectional door does not need a tongue or groove. However, as illustrated in
The width of the bottom trim is illustrates as being the same as the tongue and groove members. However, the width of the bottom trim can be wide enough to cover the bottom of front and back stabilizing panels, disclosed below. This would provide a weather proof seal to the entire bottom surface of the core of the garage door.
It is to be appreciated that the top edge of the top section of the garage door, as well as the side edges of each section, do not require weather-resistant trim. This is because these edges are located inside a garage at all times.
As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 3-5, the core in each section of the sectional overhead door includes a center framing structure 50. The framing structure is defined by a pair of bottom and top rails 52, 54 and a pair of left and right 56, 58 side stiles. Additional intermediate styles can be applied to provide proper structural support to the individual sections.
For example, a bi-fold door in a single car garage would include three intermediate styles. One would be a center style, positioned behind the seam connecting the left and right face panels. As for the other two stiles, one would be positioned on either side of the center stile, bisecting the remaining space. On a tri-fold door in a single-car garage, the there would two intermediate styles, one behind the connecting seams for each of the adjacent face panels.
The framing structure is manufactured from laminated strand lumber (LSL). LSL is stronger than wood and will not split when anchored with hardware required for holding together adjacent sections of the sectional overhead garage door.
The rails and stiles have a thickness of about an inch and a quarter. Except for the very top and bottom rails, the rails have a height, e.g., between top and bottom surfaces 60, 62 of the bottom rail 52, of about two inches. The width of the styles, e.g., between inside and outside surfaces 61, 63 of the right style 58, is the same dimension as the height of the rails.
The top and bottom rails have a height that is typically greater than the other rails. The height of the top rail is between four and five inches, depending on the weight of the door as well as, for example, the open space above the inserted lites, discussed below. That is, the top rail can serve as trim for the exposed inside core frame, above the glass.
The bottom rail has a height between three and five inches, depending on the weight and height of the door. A door greater in height than eight feet may required a larger bottom rail to act as a support for additional spacer or filler material.
The rails have a length which spans the entire width of the garage door. The stiles have a height, e.g., between top and bottom surfaces 64, 66 of the right stile 58, which is the same as the height for each section, less the depth of the top and bottom rails, and, as utilized, the thickness tongue and groove members, and bottom trim.
The core includes front and rear support panels 68, 70. The support panels are, for example, one quarter inch plywood, e.g., luan plywood. The support panels function as an effective truss, stabilizing the core and preventing the rails and stiles from shifting, in the plane of the core, out of a squared relationship. Such shifting could occur, e.g., from shear loadings which may be applied to the core during manufacture, transport, installation or during normal use. The front support panel also creates a large surface for mounting the face panels, as will be discussed.
The core includes insulating material 72 disposed in the void between the rails, stiles and stabilizing panels. The insulating material consist of, for example, sheets of polystyrene.
Forming each core member is performed by, for example, cutting the rails and stiles, as well as the tongue and groove members and the bottom trim. Once cut, these members are assembled, via, e.g., nails or screws, to form the core frames of the different sections of the garage door.
Once the different core sections are individually assembled, plural rear support panels 70, one for each section of the sectional overhead door, are cut. The rear support panels 70 are cut slightly larger than required. The rear support panels 70 are then nailed, with, e.g., finishing nails, and glued to the rear surface of the rails and stiles of the respective sections of the sectional overhead door.
The core members, with the rear support panel installed, are laid down, with the rear support panel facing downward, so that the sheets of insulation can be installed. The insulation is fabricated from polystyrene having a high insulation value, e.g., R value. For example, the insulating member is manufactured from a high density urethane. However, the sheets of insulation are not installed in the top core segment if that segment will be cut to include windows.
After the insulation is installed, the core frames are each fitted with a front support panel. Each front support panel is installed in the same way the rear support panels were installed. The resulting structure is a hollow core assembly filled with insulation.
At this time, the sections, fully assembled, are placed into a press, such as a vacuum or hydraulic press. For example, when using the vacuum press, the assembled sections are placed inside a polyurethane bag connected to the vacuum press in a typical fashion. The air is removed from the bag by vacuum action, which creates a pressurized encapsulation around the assembled sections. The pressure is maintained until the glue is dry. Once the glue sets, the sections are removed from the press and the edges of the sections are deburred.
It is to be appreciated that the overhang from the support panels creates a burr around the perimeter of the core. Accordingly, once the glue is dry, the core is deburred. Allowing for deburring typically provides a better fit than attempting to cut the support panels exactly to the size of the core frame. However, cutting to the exact size of the core frame, without accounting for deburring, is also within the scope of the disclosed embodiments.
The above disclosed process for installing the support panels and insulation may be modified as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. The order of installation of support panels is not limited. Furthermore, it is conceivable that'both support panels could be installed simultaneously, so long as insulation is properly installed. An ordinary skilled craftsman could create a jig for such a process.
Once the front and rear support panels are installed, if the top section of the sectional overhead door is to be fitted with windows, that section is further processed. Specifically, the front and rear support panels are further cut away, e.g., via routing, between opposing inside edges of the rails and styles. For example, the inside edge of the bottom rail 52 is edge 60 and the inside edge of the right hand stile 58 is edge 63. The resulting structure for this section is a core frame, with a grove member on the bottom rail, and a luan frame surrounding only the outside of the rails, stiles and the groove member.
The bottom, intermediate and top sections are assembled so that the sections take the form the complete sectional overhead garage door, e.g., as the door would appear when installed and in a closed configuration. A small spacing between the segments is provided for reasons which will be disclosed.
The face panel is laid on top of the front support panel and glued. As indicated, the front support panel provides a large surface area for receiving glue. This insures a firm and permanent connection between the core and the face panel. It also assures that the face panel will not warp over time, i.e., from humidity, as it is entirely restrained against the support panel.
Once the face panel is glued to the several core segments, a saw, e.g., a using a circular saw blade, is passed along the connecting seams between adjacent sections. For example, in
As illustrated in
Once the face panels are connected to the assembled core assemblies, the assembled sections are placed in the press, again. The sections remain in the press until the glue connecting the face panels and core assemblies has cured.
Glass is now installed on through backside of the top segment of the garage door. The glass is held in place with appropriate materials, such as putty and nailed trim. Double and triple glazings can be installed as an alternative.
At this point, the garage door has taken the form of the completed garage door. The door is finished with wood fill of any nail holes and priming. Appropriate hardware can be bolted into the LSL members so that the door can be installed in a prepared garage door opening.
The resulting door has been formed by using a CNC to mill any and all possible designs into, but not through, the face member. The core of the door has a uniform thickness so as to provide a uniform resistance to heat losses through the door.
Turning briefly back to
In addition to the above disclosed features of the invention, a weatherproof gasket may be provided at the bottom edge of the garage door. The material for the gasket can be, for example, rubber. Such a gasket would prevent water, snow, dirt and the like from passing under the garage door when the door is closed.
In the above disclosed embodiment, the front and rear support panels serve as a veneer for enclosing the LSL core frame structure. One benefit from such an enclosure is to seal the insulation in the LSL frame of the core. Another benefit is to visually conceal the LSL frame structure from the rear of the garage door. Yet another benefit is to prevent the garage door segments from undergoing strain deformation.
In an alternative embodiment, structure for preventing strain deformation could be in the form of “L” brackets at the joints for the LSL rails and slats. Alternatively, one or more properly mitered diagonal frame members could be introduced in the plane of the core members. Such frame members could also be fabricated from LSL. Insulation could be provided around these brackets and/or diagonal frame members.
If the support panels were not required for preventing strain deformation, one or both of the support panels could be omitted. The MDF face panel could be glued directly against the front of the core segments. In such a configuration, enough surface area of the front of the LSL core frame would be required to securely support the MDF face panel while also preventing the MDF face panel from warping.
It is to be appreciated that the introduction of one or more diagonal support members in the core frame could provide sufficient surface area to support the face panel with glue. Moreover, the rear veneer of the core segments could be thin PVC or other coating which serves only to conceal the core structure and encapsulate the insulation.
Accordingly, the disclosed embodiments are directed to a sectional overhead door manufactured from sheet material which can be milled on a CNC to form infinite designs and sizes. The sheet material is then laminated on to the base door.
The disclosed embodiments reduce the equipment costs for manufacturing a custom door. That is, it is cost prohibitive to fabricate custom doors based on individual client designs as platens or dies may be rarely reused. As the CNC can be programmed to mill any design, in any size, its use eliminates the expense of having platens or dies made to produce a particular design in a particular size.
In addition to reducing equipment costs, the disclosed embodiments reduce the labor cost for manufacturing a custom door. This is because the operational costs for milling a design into sheet material with a CNC machine is less than for a skilled craftsman to hand mill and fit each milled board to a base door.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not as restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims and their combination in whole or in part rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/621,096, filed Nov. 18, 2009, which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/199,584, filed Nov. 19, 2008, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4114664 | Cotton | Sep 1978 | A |
4630420 | Hagemeyer | Dec 1986 | A |
4704834 | Turner | Nov 1987 | A |
4706431 | Corvese | Nov 1987 | A |
4716700 | Hagemeyer | Jan 1988 | A |
5285608 | Costello | Feb 1994 | A |
5361552 | Fulford | Nov 1994 | A |
5438808 | Costello | Aug 1995 | A |
5766774 | Lynch et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775041 | Tull et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782055 | Crittenden | Jul 1998 | A |
5887402 | Ruggie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5937587 | Zinbarg | Aug 1999 | A |
6095229 | Kellogg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6098697 | Krupke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148896 | Pinto et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6227278 | Forsland | May 2001 | B1 |
6446695 | Forsland | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6553735 | Wang Chen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6586085 | Jella | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6948547 | Maher | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951237 | Mullet | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7043331 | Sigtryggsson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059380 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7185468 | Clark et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7383872 | Jella | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7438114 | Fowler | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7721500 | Clark et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7832166 | Daniels | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20040163776 | Brown et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172914 | Lancia | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050056381 | Truman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092447 | Mock | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144871 | Bunker, II | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194106 | Scales | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060185801 | Ni et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060272253 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070106417 | Barbir | May 2007 | A1 |
20070175602 | Ni et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070251160 | Bunker, II | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267155 | Howe et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080135192 | Truman | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090044471 | Harlin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090113830 | Clark et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090223131 | Wiese | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100018093 | O'Sullivan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100077664 | Stensland | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100269414 | Horton | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2285772 | Jul 1995 | GB |
2393634 | Apr 2004 | GB |
9212016 | Jul 1992 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61199584 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12621096 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 12643677 | US |