The present disclosure is directed to the technical field of encryption and decryption methods and apparatus as applied to computing systems. More particularly, the present disclosure is in the technical field of homomorphic encryption methods and apparatuses.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a method comprising: encoding an analytic parameter set using a homomorphic encryption scheme as a homomorphic analytic matrix; transmitting a processing set to a server system, the processing set comprising at least the homomorphic analytic matrix and a keyed hashing function; and receiving a homomorphic encrypted result from the server system, the server system having utilized the homomorphic encryption scheme, the keyed hashing function, and a format preserving encryption scheme to evaluate the homomorphic analytic matrix over a datasource.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a method comprising: receiving a homomorphic analytic matrix that comprises an analytic and analytic parameter set encoded by a client system using a homomorphic encryption scheme; utilizing at least the homomorphic encryption scheme, a keyed hashing function, and a format preserving encryption scheme to evaluate the homomorphic analytic matrix over a datasource and generate a homomorphic encrypted result; and transmitting the homomorphic encrypted result to the client system.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a system comprising: a client system configured to: encode an analytic parameter set using a homomorphic encryption scheme as a homomorphic analytic matrix; transmit a processing set to a server system, the processing set comprising at least the homomorphic analytic matrix and a keyed hashing function; and receive a homomorphic encrypted result; and a server system that communicatively couples with the client system and a data repository, the server system being configured to: receive the processing set from the client system; utilize at least the homomorphic encryption scheme, a keyed hashing function, and a format preserving encryption scheme to evaluate the homomorphic analytic matrix over a datasource and generate a homomorphic encrypted result; and transmit the homomorphic encrypted result to the client system.
Certain embodiments of the present technology are illustrated by the accompanying figures. It will be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale and that details not necessary for an understanding of the technology or that render other details difficult to perceive may be omitted. It will be understood that the technology is not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure includes systems and methods that perform secure analytics processing using an encrypted analytics matrix. In some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for performing end-to-end secure analytics using homomorphic and injective (format-preserving) encryption. These systems and methods encrypt an analytic using homomorphic encryption techniques into an encrypted analytic (in the form of an analytic matrix), perform the encrypted analytic over the desired data source(s) using a combination of homomorphic and injective/format-preserving encryption in order to produce encrypted results. The encrypted results are returned to a user's client system for decryption homomorphic encryption techniques. Using the systems and methods disclosed herein a user can perform any desired analytic over a datasource in a completely secure and private manner. Specifically, the systems and methods disclosed herein never reveal the contents or results of an analytic to a data owner, an observer, an attacker, or any other entity, even those entities having a view onto or into the end-to-end process.
For context, homomorphic encryption is a form of encryption in which a specific algebraic operation (generally referred to as addition or multiplication) performed on plaintext is equivalent to another operation performed on ciphertext. For example, in Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE) schemes, multiplication in ciphertext is equal to additional of the same values in plaintext. Format-preserving encryption (FPE) refers to encrypting in such a way that the output (the ciphertext) is in the same format as the input (the plaintext).
Injective, format-preserving encryption involves one-to-one mapping between an input and the encrypted output. These methods are advantageous in the context of format-dependent processes performed by systems that depend on a consistent format for the data they receive and process. An example system that depends on format-preserved and encrypted data includes, but is not limited to, credit card processing systems. These systems prefer input having a character length that corresponds in character length to a credit card number. Thus, the format of the credit card number should be preserved, regardless of the encryption performed on the credit card number.
Other example systems that use format preserved and encrypted data include health record information systems that must comply with requirements such as HIPAA and HITECH.
In operation, these systems and methods are configured to perform end-to-end secure analytics using homomorphic and injective (format-preserving) encryption. These FPE processes are combined with homomorphic encryption techniques to enable secure analytic processing and production of analytics that have a particular format. Thus, some embodiments enable processing of an encrypted analytic matrix over a desired data source(s) using a combination of homomorphic and injective/format-preserving encryption. Encrypted results are created and those encrypted results are returned to the user. The user can then decrypt the results using a private key that was used to homomorphically encode an analytic parameter set.
These and other advantages of the present disclosure are provided herein.
In general, the system 100 comprises a client system 102, server(s) 106A-N (could be a single server), and a data repository 108. In some embodiments, the components of the system 100 can communicate over one or more public or private networks, such as network 112. Note that there may be multiple servers corresponding to a single client system 102 in some embodiments. The server(s) 106A-N and the client system 102 may reside in varied computing environments to include a shared computing architectures, hybrid architectures, or distinct architectures such as those in a cloud computing environments.
In some embodiments, a single server can provide end-to-end secure analytics in cooperation with a plurality of client systems. In additional embodiments, a plurality of servers can provide end-to-end secure analytics in cooperation with a plurality of client systems. Thus, embodiments disclosed herein can include one-to-many relationships between client systems and servers and many-to-many relationships as well.
It will be understood that the combination of the client system(s) and server(s) is generally referred to as a system for end-to-end secure analytics using homomorphic and format-preserving encryption.
In general, a target datasource, such as the data repository 108 is referred to as D. An analytic A is to be executed over the data repository 108 (e.g., a data structure stored in the data repository, such as an array or database) using an analytic parameter set {A_P}.
Just as there can be multiple servers, the data repository 108 may reside on a single server or may be distributed over multiple servers. The datasource on the data repository 108 may be unencrypted (in plaintext form), deterministically encrypted (such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) or some block ciphering algorithms), semantically encrypted (such as Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), probabilistically encrypted, or any combination thereof. The data repository 108 can include a distributed data repository where data is stored in a plurality of distinct locations, which could include different blades in a server system, containers in a cloud, or servers that are geographically remote from one another, just as examples. Thus, the datasource could be partly stored on the data repository 108, partly on a cloud repository 111, or the datasource could be wholly stored on either.
According to some embodiments, using a homomorphic encryption scheme E, such as Paillier encryption, the analytic A and analytic parameter set {A_P} are encoded as a homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M}. To be sure, the homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M} is completely encrypted. Thus, the analytic A and/or the analytic parameter set {A_P} cannot be recovered from {A_M} without a private key E, K{A_M, E} used to homomorphically encrypt the analytic parameter set {A_P} with the private key E, K{A_M, E}. This construct allows the system to fulfill a homomorphic analytic request, providing a secure and completely encrypted method of performing the analytic request in contrast with traditional methods (e.g., non-homomorphic) of performing analytics over the datasource(s) 108 (and/or datasource 111).
In some embodiments, the homomorphic encryption scheme E and private key E, K{Q_V, E} form a paired data set. The client system 102 retains the private key for later use. The paired data set can also be retained at the client system 102.
While Paillier encryption has been noted as an example homomorphic encryption scheme, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other homomorphic encryption schemes can likewise be utilized in accordance with the present disclosure. These homomorphic encryption schemes include, but are not limited to, fully and/or partially homomorphic encryption schemes. Indeed, any encryption scheme, protocol, or format that allows for computation of an encrypted data set without requiring decryption of the encrypted data set during computation can be used.
In order to perform the secure end-to-end analytics processing of the present disclosure, the homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M} is first constructed from the analytic A and the analytic parameter set {A_P} and encoded using the homomorphic encryption scheme E. In some embodiments, the homomorphic encryption scheme E can be applied to the analytic parameter set {A_P}. In other embodiments, the homomorphic encryption scheme E can be applied at a later point in the method, as described below.
A set of term components {T} of the analytic A are extracted using a term generation function TG. For example, if the analytic A is a database frequency distribution analytic for elements in <row:column> pairs, then the set of term components {T} reflects the frequency distribution of these elements from the datasource on the data repository 108. To be sure, the specifics of the analytic A, the analytic parameter set {A_P}, the set of term components {T}, and the term generation function TG will vary according to each particular analytic analysis that is performed.
For context, the term generation function TG is applied to the analytic A to produce the set of term components {T} that determine what data is obtained from the data repository 108 in response to the specifics of the analytic A. The term generator function TG can include any set of rules or parameters that are used to convert the analytic A into a format that can be used by the server(s) 106A-N to fulfill the analytic A (analytic A and analytic parameter set {A_P}) over the data repository 108.
After the set of term components {T} are generated, a keyed hashing function H is then applied to the set of term components {T}. Thus, H is a keyed hashing function generated with a key k. In some embodiments a range of the keyed hashing function H is obtained over the set of term components s {T} such that H(T)={H(T): T in {T}}.
In some embodiments, a desired dimension of the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M is represented as d×s where s>|{T}|, s>=d, and d∥H(T))|. The keyed hashing function H (such as keyed-hash message authentication code (HMAC)) can be used to create cryptographic checksums in some embodiments that allow for both data verification and data authentication. In some embodiments, the hash function H is used to process the set of term components {T} to remove zero value bitmasks, which would, if processed over the data repository 108, return no usable data.
In some embodiments, this bitwise analysis is performed over C(H(T))={c_T: c_T is the d-dimensional homomorphic analytic matrix partitioning the hash H(T) into d-many bitwise components}, |C(H(T))|=|H(T))|=|{T}|.
In one non-limiting example, if d=3 and H(T)=000001001111, then c_T={c_T[0], c_T[1], c_T[2]} where c_T[0]=0000, c_T[1]=0100, and c_T[2]=1111. To be sure, the bitwise hash created from the set of terms {T} is divided into three sets of four bits. In some embodiments, c_T[d−1] must be distinct for all elements in H(T). If this is not the case, a different keyed hashing function H′ can be selected to avoid bitwise component collisions (e.g., where two or more bitwise components have identical hashed values). This different keyed hashing function H′ can be used to reconstruct H(T) and C(H(T)) before proceeding.
Zero and non-zero bitmasks are identified in some embodiments such that for j=0, . . . , (d−1): for m=0, . . . , (s−1): if there exists an element of C(H(T)) such that c_T[j]=m, then let A_M (j,m)=E(B_j,m) where B_j,m is a nonzero bit mask corresponding to an element of {T}; otherwise, A_M (j,m)=E(0). In this manner, the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M contains only encryptions of nonzero bitmasks for the set of term components {T}. Thus, zero value bitmasks are not evaluated in some embodiments. To be sure, the set of term components {T} that produce zero value bitmasks are disregarded by the server system 106A-N, which reduces computing time.
In sum, once the term generation function TG has been applied to the analytic A to generate the set of term components {T}, the hashing function H is applied to the set of term components {T} to determine nonzero value bitmasks for at least a portion of the set of term components {T}, in order to assemble the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M.
As noted above, in some instances, the homomorphic encryption scheme E can be applied at after assembly of the analytic matrix (e.g., after nonzero bit mask values have been removed).
In some embodiments, a processing set or message can be generated and transmitted from the client system 102 to the server(s) 106A-N. This processing set includes the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M, the term generator function TG, the analytic A, and the keyed hashing function H.
A processing set is then executed by the server(s) 106A-N over the target data source (e.g., data repository 108). In more detail, using techniques of the homomorphic encryption scheme E and a format-preserving encryption scheme F, the server(s) 106A-N will extract the set of term components {T} from D (data repository 108) using the term generator TG. The server(s) 106A-N evaluates the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M over set of term components {T} and produces encrypted results E(R). These encrypted results E(R) are transmitted back to the client system. Specifically, the encrypted results E(R) are a homomorphic encrypted result. Thus, the encrypted results E(R) have a format that is preserved relative to the format of the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M. Also, in some instances, the encrypted result is both homomorphically encrypted and has a preserved format due to the use of FPE.
Using the private key associated used to create the homomorphic analytic matrix A_M, the client system 102 decrypts E(R) to obtain the results R of the analytic A.
Again, as the homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M} only contains non-zero entries for the set of term components {T}, the homomorphic properties of E ensure that only encrypted results corresponding to the nonzero elements of the analytic and analytic parameter set are present in the results R. Again, this nonzero bitmasking identification and removal process is a function of the hashing function H that was applied to the set of term components {T} extracted from the analytic A by use of the term generator TG.
Thus, the analytic A was performed over the datasource in the data repository 108 in a completely secure and private manner. Indeed, the contents of the analytic A (as well as the analytic parameter set {A_P}), the contents of the homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M}, and/or the results R of the analytic A are never revealed to the data owner, an observer, an attacker, or any other third party.
It will be understood that the systems and methods provide a new construct by which to perform a homomorphic analytic with results R, providing a secure, completely encrypted method of performing a probabilistic analytic in contrast with traditional methods of performing analytics over datasources.
By way of non-limiting example, the client system selects an analytic and corresponding analytic parameter set. In one embodiment, the analytic could include determining a range of Internet Protocol (IP) addresses matched to user identifiers. These IP addresses are associated with users who have not logged onto a particular service for a period of time. For example, an address 123.2.1.2 is linked to a user identifier of a@abc.co. This user has not logged onto an email service for a month or more.
These data pairs can be stored in a relational database (e.g., datasource) in a data repository. In some embodiments, these data pairs are stored in different columns or fields of a database. The analytic and analytic parameter set {A_P}, when processed over the database will produce a set of IP addresses and user identifiers that correspond to this desired analytic.
By way of another non-limiting example, the client system generates or selects an analytic that is representative of a particular information set that is of interest, such as analytics related to credit card numbers. The analytic parameter set could include, for example, a list of customers that used their credit cards for purchases over $5,000. Thus, a desired result of the analytic would include a list of credit card numbers that were associated with purchases over $5,000 and/or possibly names of these cardholders. This information could be executed over a datasource, such as a data repository that stores credit card purchase data. This datasource could be stored at the cloud or could be stored with a third-party system. Regardless, it is presumed that the datasource stores credit card numbers analytics related to credit card numbers.
Again, these examples are provided merely for describing example use cases of the present disclosure and are limited in nature for purposes of clarity and brevity of description. Indeed, other use cases can be more complex, such as when the analytic parameter set requires a plurality of parameters in order to complete the analytic. In addition, multiple analytics can be performed sequentially or in parallel.
In some embodiments, the method includes a step 202 of selecting (or receiving a selection from a user) an analytic and analytic parameter set by a client system. Again, the analytic comprises the analytic parameter set that is to be executed over the datasource. A user can select their desire analytic and analytic parameter set through GUIs generated by a user-facing application.
Next, the method includes a step 204 of encoding the analytic parameter set using a homomorphic encryption scheme as a homomorphic analytic matrix. A specific example sub-method of encoding the analytic parameter set using a homomorphic encryption scheme as a homomorphic analytic matrix is illustrated in
Referring briefly to
In some embodiments, the method can include a step 304 of applying a keyed hashing function to each of the set of term components generated in step 302. A hashing key used to hash the set of term components can be retained by the client system. This hashing operation will produce non-zero value bitmasks, and in some instances zero value bitmasks as well. Rather than processing term components corresponding to zero value bitmasks, the method can include ignoring zero value bitmasks. As noted above, this bitwise analysis performed over each of the set of term components.
The method can also include a step 306 of selecting a new hashing function if two of the non-zero value bitmasks corresponding term components are identical to one another. Again, this prevents collisions or confusion in the analytic results for these non-zero value bitmasks. Thus, the method would return to step 302 in some embodiments and step 306 is optional and illustrated in dotted line.
Once the non-zero bitmasks of term components are identified, the method includes a step 308 of generating a processing set. The processing set includes the homomorphic analytic matrix, the term generator function, the analytic, and the keyed hashing function.
Returning back to
The server system(s) will utilize the homomorphic analytic matrix, the term generator function, the analytic, the keyed hashing function, and a format-preserving encryption scheme in some embodiments. In more detail, the server system(s) will extract a set of term components from the datasource using a term generator function. This includes utilization of at least both the homomorphic encryption scheme and the keyed hashing function disclosed above.
The server system(s) will then utilize techniques of homomorphic encryption and format-preserving encryption to evaluate the homomorphic analytic matrix over the datasource using the extracted set of term components to generate a homomorphic encrypted result. To be sure, this encrypted result is a homomorphic encrypted result. As noted above, the format preserving encryption scheme can include an injective FPE.
In accordance with the present disclosure, the method can also include a step 208 of receiving the homomorphic encrypted result (e.g., response to the analytic). In one or more embodiments, the method includes a step 210 of decrypting the encrypted result using a private key that was used to homomorphically encrypt the analytic parameter set. This allows the client system to review the results. Again, this process in
In some embodiments, the method includes a step 402 of receiving a processing set from a client system that comprises the homomorphic analytic matrix, the term generator function, the analytic, and the keyed hashing function. The homomorphic analytic matrix is an encoded analytic matrix generated by a client system using a homomorphic encryption scheme.
According to some embodiments, the method also includes a step 404 of extracting a set of term components from the datasource using a term generator function. This includes utilization of both the homomorphic encryption scheme and the keyed hashing function disclosed above.
The method then includes a step 406 of evaluating the homomorphic analytic matrix over the datasource using techniques of homomorphic encryption and a format-preserving encryption. In more detail, the extracted set of term components is processed over the datasource using both homomorphic and FPE encryption techniques to generate a homomorphic and/or format-preserved encrypted result. To be sure, while the use of homomorphic encryption is used throughout, the use of FPE is an optional process in some instances.
To be sure, this encrypted result is a homomorphically and format-preserved encrypted result corresponding to the homomorphic analytic matrix.
Next, the method includes a step 408 of transmitting the homomorphic encrypted result to the client system. As noted above, the client system would then be able to decrypt the homomorphic encrypted result and recover the result of the analytic(s).
To be sure, the client system can decrypt the homomorphic and FPE encrypted result and recover the result of the initial requested analytic. The use of a format preserving encryption scheme ensures that the structure or format of the encrypted result matches a format of the homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M} that was encrypted using injective FPE. Again, this combined use of homomorphic encryption and injective FPE allows for both completely secure, encrypted processing of data while at the same time maintaining format preservation for systems that require particularly formatted data.
In some optional embodiments, the analytic parameter set can be encoded with another FPE scheme or other obfuscating process such as AES, a Feistel network cipher, or other similar encryption schemes. Thus, the homomorphic analytic matrix {A_M} (or analytic parameter set {A_P}) can include plaintext content or ciphertext content. It will be understood that when the analytic parameter set includes ciphertext content, any decrypted results that include ciphertext content will require further decryption before results are accessible. That is, the client system receives an encrypted result. The client system will use its private key to decrypt (used for homomorphic encryption) the encrypted result. This result will require further decryption when the analytic parameter set includes ciphertext content. For example, if the ciphertext content was created using AES, an AES key would be applied to the recovered ciphertext content.
In some embodiments, the client system 102 performs a set of operations such as a process of selecting or specifying an analytic. In this instance, an analytic is selected that includes an analytic parameter set in process 502. The client system 102 then utilizes a homomorphic encryption scheme to generate a homomorphic analytic matrix in process 504. A private key 506 used to homomorphically encrypt the analytic parameter set is retained on the client system 102.
As noted above in the method of
The processing set is transmitted to server(s) 106A-N in a transmission process 508. The server(s) 106A-N extracts a set of term components from the datasource using a term generator function, the homomorphic encryption scheme, and the keyed hashing function in step 510.
The server(s) 106A-N then evaluates the homomorphic analytic matrix over the datasource (e.g., data repository 108) using techniques of homomorphic and format-preserving encryption. As noted above, this includes using HE and FPE to process the extracted set of term components over the datasource to generate a homomorphic encrypted result having a preserved format, in process 512. In some embodiments, this also includes using the keyed hashing function. In some embodiments, steps 510 and 512 are performed cooperatively in a single step.
The server(s) 106A-N then transmit the homomorphic encrypted result back to the client system 102 in transmission process 514. The client system 102 can then decrypt the homomorphic encrypted result to recover the result in process 516.
The example computer system 1 includes a processor or multiple processors 5 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), or both), and a main memory 10 and static memory 15, which communicate with each other via a bus 20. The computer system 1 may further include a video display 35 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD)). The computer system 1 may also include an alpha-numeric input device(s) 30 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a voice recognition or biometric verification unit (not shown), a drive unit 37 (also referred to as disk drive unit), a signal generation device 40 (e.g., a speaker), and a network interface device 45. The computer system 1 may further include a data encryption module (not shown) to encrypt data.
The drive unit 37 includes a computer or machine-readable medium 50 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions and data structures (e.g., instructions 55) embodying or utilizing any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 55 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 10 and/or within the processors 5 during execution thereof by the computer system 1. The main memory 10 and the processors 5 may also constitute machine-readable media.
The instructions 55 may further be transmitted or received over a network via the network interface device 45 utilizing any one of a number of well-known transfer protocols (e.g., Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)). While the machine-readable medium 50 is shown in an example embodiment to be a single medium, the term “computer-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that causes the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present application, or that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying data structures utilized by or associated with such a set of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, and carrier wave signals. Such media may also include, without limitation, hard disks, floppy disks, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), and the like. The example embodiments described herein may be implemented in an operating environment comprising software installed on a computer, in hardware, or in a combination of software and hardware.
Not all components of the computer system 1 are required and thus portions of the computer system 1 can be removed if not needed, such as Input/Output (I/O) devices (e.g., input device(s) 30). One skilled in the art will recognize that the Internet service may be configured to provide Internet access to one or more computing devices that are coupled to the Internet service, and that the computing devices may include one or more processors, buses, memory devices, display devices, input/output devices, and the like. Furthermore, those skilled in the art may appreciate that the Internet service may be coupled to one or more databases, repositories, servers, and the like, which may be utilized in order to implement any of the embodiments of the disclosure as described herein.
As used herein, the term “module” may also refer to any of an application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present technology has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the present technology in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the present technology. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present technology and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the present technology for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Aspects of the present technology are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the present technology. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present technology. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular embodiments, procedures, techniques, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” or “according to one embodiment” (or other phrases having similar import) at various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. Furthermore, depending on the context of discussion herein, a singular term may include its plural forms and a plural term may include its singular form. Similarly, a hyphenated term (e.g., “on-demand”) may be occasionally interchangeably used with its non-hyphenated version (e.g., “on demand”), a capitalized entry (e.g., “Software”) may be interchangeably used with its non-capitalized version (e.g., “software”), a plural term may be indicated with or without an apostrophe (e.g., PE's or PEs), and an italicized term (e.g., “N+1”) may be interchangeably used with its non-italicized version (e.g., “N+1”). Such occasional interchangeable uses shall not be considered inconsistent with each other.
Also, some embodiments may be described in terms of “means for” performing a task or set of tasks. It will be understood that a “means for” may be expressed herein in terms of a structure, such as a processor, a memory, an I/O device such as a camera, or combinations thereof. Alternatively, the “means for” may include an algorithm that is descriptive of a function or method step, while in yet other embodiments the “means for” is expressed in terms of a mathematical formula, prose, or as a flow chart or signal diagram.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
If any disclosures are incorporated herein by reference and such incorporated disclosures conflict in part and/or in whole with the present disclosure, then to the extent of conflict, and/or broader disclosure, and/or broader definition of terms, the present disclosure controls. If such incorporated disclosures conflict in part and/or in whole with one another, then to the extent of conflict, the later-dated disclosure controls.
The terminology used herein can imply direct or indirect, full or partial, temporary or permanent, immediate or delayed, synchronous or asynchronous, action or inaction. For example, when an element is referred to as being “on,” “connected” or “coupled” to another element, then the element can be directly on, connected or coupled to the other element and/or intervening elements may be present, including indirect and/or direct variants. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present. The description herein is illustrative and not restrictive. Many variations of the technology will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon review of this disclosure.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth herein. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
This application claims the benefit and priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,890, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,918, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,893, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; United States Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,906, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,908, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,913, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,902, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,896, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,899, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/462,818, filed on Feb. 23, 2017, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein, including all references and appendices, for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5732390 | Katayanagi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6178435 | Schmookler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6745220 | Hars | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748412 | Ruehle | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6910059 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7712143 | Comlekoglu | May 2010 | B2 |
7937270 | Smaragdis et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8515058 | Gentry | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8565435 | Gentry et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8781967 | Tehranchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8832465 | Gulati et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9059855 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094378 | Yung et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9189411 | Mckeen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9215219 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9288039 | Monet et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9491111 | Roth et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9503432 | El Emam et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514317 | Martin et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9565020 | Camenisch et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9577829 | Roth et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9652609 | Kang et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9846787 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9852306 | Cash et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9942032 | Kornaropoulos et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9946810 | Trepetin et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9973334 | Hibshoosh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10027486 | Liu | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10055602 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10073981 | Arasu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10075288 | Khedr et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10129028 | Kamakari et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10148438 | Evancich et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181049 | El Defrawy et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10210266 | Antonopoulos et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10235539 | Ito et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10255454 | Kamara et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10333715 | Chu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10375042 | Chaum | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396984 | French et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10423806 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10489604 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10496631 | Tschudin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10644876 | Williams et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10693627 | Carr | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10721057 | Carr | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10728018 | Williams et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10771237 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790960 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10817262 | Carr et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20020032712 | Miyasaka et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073316 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104002 | Nishizawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030037087 | Rarick | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059041 | MacKenzie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110388 | Pavlin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040167952 | Gueron et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050008152 | MacKenzie | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050076024 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050259817 | Ramzan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008080 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008081 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070053507 | Smaragdis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095909 | Chaum | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140479 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143280 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090037504 | Hussain | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083546 | Staddon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090193033 | Ramzan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268908 | Bikel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279694 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287837 | Felsher | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100202606 | Almeida | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205430 | Chiou et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241595 | Felsher | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110026781 | Osadchy et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110107105 | Hada | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110525 | Gentry | May 2011 | A1 |
20110243320 | Halevi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283099 | Nath et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120039469 | Mueller | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054485 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066510 | Weinman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120201378 | Nabeel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265794 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265797 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130010950 | Kerschbaum | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051551 | El Aimani | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054665 | Felch | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130114811 | Boufounos et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148868 | Troncoso et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170640 | Gentry | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191650 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195267 | Alessio et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198526 | Goto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216044 | Gentry et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230168 | Takenouchi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237242 | Oka et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246813 | Mori et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130326224 | Yavuz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339722 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339751 | Sun et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346741 | Kim | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346755 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140164758 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189811 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233727 | Rohloff et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140281511 | Kaushik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140355756 | Iwamura et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150100785 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100794 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150205967 | Naedele et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215123 | Kipnis et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227930 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229480 | Joye et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244517 | Nita | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248458 | Sakamoto | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304736 | Lal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150358152 | Ikarashi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358153 | Gentry | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160004874 | Ioannidis et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036826 | Pogorelik et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072623 | Joye et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105402 | Kupwade-Patil et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105414 | Bringer et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119346 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160140348 | Nawaz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179945 | Lastra Diaz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182222 | Rane et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160323098 | Bathen | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335450 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344557 | Chabanne et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350648 | Gilad-Bachrach | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170070340 | Hibshoosh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070351 | Yan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099133 | Gu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134158 | Pasol et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170185776 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170264426 | Joye et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180091466 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180139054 | Chu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180198601 | Laine et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204284 | Cerezo Sanchez | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212751 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212752 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212753 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212754 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212755 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212756 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212757 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212758 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212759 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212775 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180224882 | Carr | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180234254 | Camenisch et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180267981 | Sirdey et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180270046 | Carr | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276417 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180343109 | Koseki et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349632 | Bent et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359097 | Lindell | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373882 | Veugen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190013950 | Becker et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042786 | Williams et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190108350 | Bohli et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190158272 | Chopra et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190229887 | Ding et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190238311 | Zheng | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251553 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251554 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253235 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190260585 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190280880 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190312728 | Poeppelmann | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190327078 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190334716 | Kocsis et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349191 | Soriente et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371106 | Kaye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200134200 | Williams et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150930 | Carr et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200204341 | Williams et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2873186 | Mar 2018 | EP |
5680007 | Mar 2015 | JP |
101386294 | Apr 2014 | KR |
WO2014105160 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO2015094261 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO2016003833 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO2016018502 | Feb 2016 | WO |
W02018091084 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018091084 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018136801 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136804 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136811 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014535, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 9 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014530, dated Apr. 23, 2018, 7 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014551, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 8 pages. |
Petition to Insitute Derivation Proceeding Pursuant to 35 USC 135; Case No. DER2019-00009, US Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Jul. 26, 2019, 272 pages. (2 PDFs). |
SCAMP Working Paper L29/11, “A Woods Hole Proposal Using Striping,” Dec. 2011, 14 pages. |
O'Hara, Michael James, “Shovel-ready Private Information Retrieval,” Dec. 2015, 4 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “Proposed Laughing Owl,” NSA Technical Report, Jan. 5, 2016, 18 pages. |
Williams, Ellison Anne et al., “Wideskies: Scalable Private Informaton Retrieval,” 14 pages, Sep. 2016. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “A Private Stream Search Technique,” NSA Technical Report, Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Paillier-encrypted databases with fast aggregated queries,” 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Jan. 8-11, 2017, pp. 848-853. |
Tu et al., “Processing Analytical Queries over Encrypted Data,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 6, Issue No. 5, Mar. 13, 2013. pp. 289-300. |
Boneh et al., “Private Database Queries Using Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption”, Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2013/422, Standford University [online], Jun. 27, 2013, [retrieved on Dec. 9, 2019], 22 pages. |
Chen et al., “Efficient Multi-Key Homomorphic Encryption with Packed Ciphertexts with Application to Oblivious Neural Network Inference”, CCS '19 Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, May 19, 2019. pp. 395-412. |
Armknecht et al., “A Guide to Fully Homomorphic Encryption” IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2015/1192 [online], Dec. 14, 2015, 35 pages. |
Bayar et al., “A Deep Learning Approach To Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using A New Convolutional Layer”, IH&MMSec 2016, Jun. 20-22, 2016. pp. 5-10. |
Juvekar et al. “Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference”, 27th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 15-17, 2018. pp. 1650-1668. |
Bösch et al., “SOFIR: Securely Outsourced Forensic Recognition,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE 978-1-4799-2893-4/14, 2014, pp. 2713-2717. |
Waziri et al., “Big Data Analytics and Data Security in the Cloud via Fullly Homomorphic Encryption,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, pp. 744-753. |
Bajpai et al., “A Fully Homomorphic Encryption Implementation on Cloud Computing,” International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, ISSN 0974-2239 vol. 4, No. 8, 2014, pp. 811-816. |
Viejo et al., “Asymmetric homomorphisms for secure aggregation in heterogeneous scenarios,” Information Fusion 13, Elsevier B.V., Mar. 21, 2011, pp. 285-295. |
Patil et al, “Big Data Privacy Using Fully Homomorphic Non-Deterministic Encryption,” IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference, Jan. 5-7, 2017, 15 pages. |
Panda et al., “FPGA Prototype of Low Latency BBS PRNG,” IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems, Dec. 2015, pp. 118-123, 7 pages. |
Sahu et al., “Implementation of Modular Multiplication for RSA Algorithm,” 2011 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, 2011, pp. 112-114, 3 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Achieving trustworthy Homomorphic Encryption by combining it with a Trusted Execution Environment,” Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Application (JoWUA), Mar. 2018, pp. 86-99. |
Google Scholar, search results for “trusted execution environment database”, 2 pages, Aug. 1, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180212933 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62448890 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448918 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448893 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448906 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448908 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448913 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448902 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448896 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448899 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62462818 | Feb 2017 | US |