Secure archive

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8756436
  • Patent Number
    8,756,436
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 16, 2008
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 17, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Storage apparatus (20) includes a memory (30) and an encryption processor (28), which is configured to receive and encrypt data transmitted from one or more computers (24) for storage in the memory. A one-way link (32) couples the encryption processor to the memory so as to enable the encryption processor to write the encrypted data to the memory but not to read from the memory.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to computer systems, and specifically to systems and methods for data communication and storage.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In a computer network handling sensitive data, such as data in military or financial environments, portions of the network may be connected by one-way data links. For example, confidential data that must not be accessed from external sites may be stored on a computer that is configured to receive data over a one-way link and has no physical outgoing link over which data might be transmitted to the external site.


One-way links may be implemented, for example, using Waterfall™ systems, which are manufactured by Gita Technologies, Ltd. (Rosh HaAyin, Israel). The Waterfall system provides a physical one-way connection based on fiberoptic communication, using an underlying proprietary transfer protocol. When a transmitting computer is connected by a Waterfall system (or other one-way link) to a receiving computer, the receiving computer can receive data from the transmitting computer but has no means of sending any return communications to the transmitting computer.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Networked computing systems, such as enterprise computer networks, often use centralized storage for archiving of data, such as transaction logs, information technology (IT) system events, and backups. Maintaining the integrity of such archives is crucial in order to ensure that functions such as log analysis, audits, forensics, and data recovery after system failures can be carried out. It is also necessary to prevent unauthorized parties from accessing sensitive archived data.


The embodiments of the present invention that are described hereinbelow address these needs by providing a secure storage system, in which computers on a network can write data to a memory only via an encryption processor. (The term “memory” is used broadly in the present patent application and in the claims to refer to any sort of data storage medium.) The processor encrypts the data using an encryption key, which typically is not available to the source computers, and conveys the encrypted data over a one-way link to the memory. Thus, the encryption processor is able to write encrypted data to the memory but not to read from the memory.


Since all data written to the memory are encrypted, any malicious program code that a hacker may attempt to introduce into the storage system is scrambled and therefore rendered harmless until it is decrypted. Decryption may take place in a controlled, “sterile” environment, in which malicious code can be detected and neutralized before it affects vulnerable network elements. For example, the storage contents may be duplicated and then decrypted in an environment that is separate from the storage system, so that any damage that may be caused by malicious code will not affect the original stored data.


There is therefore provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, storage apparatus, including:


a memory;


an encryption processor, which is configured to receive and encrypt data transmitted from one or more computers for storage in the memory; and


a one-way link, coupling the encryption processor to the memory so as to enable the encryption processor to write the encrypted data to the memory but not to read from the memory.


In some embodiments, the encryption processor is configured to encrypt the data using an encryption key that is not available to the one or more computers. In one embodiment, for each transmission of the data from the one or more computers, the encryption processor is configured to select the encryption key from among a plurality of possible encryption keys, and to convey an indication of the selected encryption key to the memory in addition to the encrypted data.


Typically, the memory is configured to store the encrypted data without decryption prior to storage.


In a disclosed embodiment, the encryption processor is configured to receive the data from the one or more computers over a network and to apply a time stamp to each of at least some items of the data that are written to the memory.


In some embodiments, the apparatus includes a monitoring processor, which is coupled to the memory so as to generate an indication of a status of the data stored in the memory, and a further one-way link, coupling the monitoring processor to at least one of the computers so as to enable the monitoring processor to convey the indication of the status to the at least one of the computers but not to receive inputs from the one or more computers.


There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for data storage, including:


receiving data transmitted from one or more computers for storage in a memory;


encrypting the received data using an encryption processor before passing the data to the memory;


conveying the encrypted data from the encryption processor to the memory over a one-way link, which permits the encryption processor to write the encrypted data to the memory but not to read from the memory; and


storing the encrypted data in the memory.


The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a system for data transmission and storage, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a system 20 for data transmission and storage, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Computers 24 in system 20 write data to a secure archive 22 via a computer network 26. These data may comprise, for example, transaction logs or other data logging entries, database updates, file backups, or substantially any other type of data that may be subject to archiving. Network 26 may comprise substantially any sort of private or public network. (In an alternative embodiment, not shown in the figures, archive 22 may be connected by a single link rather than through a multi-computer network.) Even when access to network 26 is carefully controlled, however, unauthorized users may still be able to gain access to the network. Such users may attempt to introduce malicious program code into archive 22 in order to read data stored in the archive or to corrupt the contents of the archive. For example, an attacker who has hacked into the network might try to erase or alter the IT system log in order to cover his tracks.


Archive 22 comprises an encryption processor 28, which writes encrypted data to a memory 30 via a one-way link 32. Computers on network 26 are able to write data to memory 30 only via the encryption processor. Therefore, any malicious program code that a user may attempt to introduce into archive 22 will be scrambled by encryption and will simply be stored in scrambled form in memory 30. Consequently, the user will be unable to cause the control unit of memory 30 to perform any action other than simply writing data to the memory, since any program instructions submitted by the user will be rendered unintelligible by the encryption.


Encryption processor 28 may comprise either dedicated hardware or a general-purpose, software-driven computer processor, or a combination of hardware and software elements. For rapid encryption, as well as enhanced security, for example, the encryption processor may comprise one or more gate arrays with suitable firmware and/or an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). If a general-purpose computer processor is used, the software for carrying out the functions described herein may be downloaded to the processor over a network, or it may be alternatively provided on tangible media, such as optical, magnetic, or electronic memory media.


The encryption processor may use any suitable sort of encryption that is known in the art, including both asymmetric encryption methods, such as the RSA (Rivest Shamir Adelman) algorithm, and symmetric methods, such as the DES (Data Encryption Standard) and AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) algorithms, as well as simpler methods, which are sometimes referred to as “scrambling.” In encrypting incoming data, the encryption processor typically uses different keys at different times, and may use a key that is not available to computers outside archive 22. Because of the changing keys, hackers are prevented from using a known key to prepare their transmissions in such a way as to have malicious effect after encoding. Typically, the encryption processor chooses the key for each data item or group of data items using a pseudo-random process, either by selection from a list that was prepared in advance, or by pseudo-random generation. (Alternatively, the key may be chosen deterministically, as long as it is not known or available to the sending computer.) The key may be of any suitable length, depending on the encryption algorithm that is used.


Encryption processor 28 transmits the encrypted data over one-way link 32 to memory 30. Assuming that the encryption processor uses different encryption keys at different times, the encryption processor may also transmit to the memory an indication of the key that is to be used to decrypt each transmission. The indication may comprise either the key itself or an index to a predetermined list of keys. Optionally, either the encryption processor or the memory controller (or both) may add a time-stamp to each item of data, in order to facilitate audit functions. Alternatively or additionally, the time stamp may be applied by a dedicated hardware unit.


One-way link 32 may comprise a Waterfall link, as described in the Background section above, or any other suitable type of one-way link that is known in the art. As noted above, this link is typically physically configured so as to permit data transmission in only one direction, from processor 28 to memory 30. Optionally, link 32 may comprise two or more one-way links connected in series, with a data security engine placed between the one-way links. This link configuration, which provides enhanced security, is described, for example, in PCT Patent Application PCT/IL2006[DK1]/001499, filed Dec. 28, 2006, which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.


Memory 30 may comprise any suitable type of storage device, such as magnetic, optical, or electronic memory, or a combination of these memory types. The storage device may comprise a control unit (not shown), as is known in the art, which receives the encrypted data over link 32 and writes the data to appropriate locations in the memory. As noted above, however, the control unit does not attempt to decrypt the data before writing. Rather, the data are typically decrypted and “sterilized” offline, as needed, by a separate decryption processor (not shown). To decrypt the data, this processor uses the key that was indicated by the encryption processor, as explained above. After decryption, the decryption processor sterilizes the data in order to detect and neutralize any malicious content, such as viruses, worms and spyware, for example. Methods that can be used for encryption and decryption of potentially-malicious data transmissions are described in greater detail in PCT Patent Application PCT/IL2007/001070, [DK2] filed Aug. 29, 2007, which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.


Some archiving applications may require archive 22 to return an acknowledgment or other status indicator to one or more of computers 24 after receiving data from the computer. Simple data acknowledgments may be returned by encryption processor 28. Alternatively or additionally, an optional monitoring processor 34 may monitor the status of memory 30 and report on data storage status. Typically, the monitoring processor is pre-programmed to carry out these functions and performs the functions without receiving explicit commands to do so from computers on network 26. Monitoring processor 34 conveys the reports via a one-way link 36 to an output interface 38, which then transmits the reports to the appropriate computer 24 on network 26. In this configuration, computers 24 are unable to send inputs, such as data or commands, to the monitoring processor, and are thus prevented from introducing malicious program code that could cause this processor to retrieve and transmit confidential data from memory 30 or otherwise tamper with the contents of the memory.


Although FIG. 1 shows a certain configuration of system 20 and particularly of the elements in archive 22, the principles of the present invention may similarly be applied in other sorts of physical configurations. For example, links 32 and 36 may be combined in a single package with appropriate connections and switching to ensure that data flows over the links only in the directions and operational modes that are described above. It will thus be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.

Claims
  • 1. Storage apparatus, comprising: an archive memory centrally archiving data for a plurality of computers;an encryption processor, which is configured to receive and encrypt data transmitted from one or more computers for storage in the archive memory; anda one-way link, coupling the encryption processor to the archive memory so as to enable the encryption processor to write the encrypted data to the memory but not to read from the memory,wherein the one-way link is physically configured so as to permit data transmission in only one direction, from the processor to the memory, andwherein the memory and the encryption processor are connected in a manner allowing direct transmission only from the encryption processor to the memory, and not from the memory to the encryption processor.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the encryption processor is configured to encrypt the data using an encryption key that is not available to the one or more computers.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein for each transmission of the data from the one or more computers, the encryption processor is configured to select the encryption key from among a plurality of possible encryption keys, and to convey an indication of the selected encryption key to the memory in addition to the encrypted data.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the memory is configured to store the encrypted data without decryption prior to storage.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the encryption processor is configured to receive the data from the one or more computers over a network.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the encryption processor is configured to apply a time stamp to each of at least some items of the data that are written to the memory.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, and comprising: a monitoring processor, which is coupled to the memory so as to generate an indication of a status of the data stored in the memory; anda further one-way link, coupling the monitoring processor to at least one of the computers so as to enable the monitoring processor to convey the indication of the status to the at least one of the computers but not to receive inputs from the one or more computers.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the memory and the encryption processor are connected directly only by the one way link.
  • 9. The apparatus according to claim 1, comprising an additional one way link included in a communication path allowing transmission from the memory to at least one of the computers, without the communication path passing through the encryption processor.
  • 10. The apparatus according to claim 1, comprising a monitoring processor separate from the encryption processor, which monitors the status of the memory.
  • 11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the archive memory is configured to only receive data encrypted by the encryption processor.
  • 12. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the archive memory is located within a private protected computer network such that data can be transmitted to the archive memory only from computers within the private protected network.
  • 13. A method for data storage, comprising: receiving data transmitted from one or more computers for storage in an archive memory centrally archiving data for a plurality of computers;encrypting the received data using an encryption processor before passing the data to the archive memory;conveying the encrypted data from the encryption processor to the archive memory over a one-way link, which permits the encryption processor to write the encrypted data to the memory but not to read from the memory,wherein the one-way link is physically configured so as to permit data transmission in only one direction, from the processor to the memory, and wherein the memory and the encryption processor are connected in a manner allowing direct transmission only from the encryption processor to the memory, and not from the memory to the encryption processor; andstoring the encrypted data in the memory.
  • 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein encrypting the received data comprises encrypting the data using an encryption key that is not available to the one or more computers.
  • 15. The method according to claim 14, wherein encrypting the data comprises, for each transmission of the data from the one or more computers, selecting the encryption key from among a plurality of possible encryption keys, and conveying an indication of the selected encryption key to the memory in addition to the encrypted data.
  • 16. The method according to claim 13, wherein storing the encrypted data comprises writing the encrypted data to the memory without decryption prior to storage.
  • 17. The method according to claim 13, wherein receiving the data comprises receiving the data from the one or more computers over a network.
  • 18. The method according to claim 13, and comprising applying a time stamp to each of at least some items of the data that are written to the memory.
  • 19. The method according to claim 13, and comprising: generating an indication of a status of the data stored in the memory using a monitoring processor coupled to the memory; andconveying the indication from the monitoring processor to at least one of the computers via a further one-way link, which permits the monitoring processor so to convey the indication of the status to the at least one of the computers but not to receive inputs from the one or more computers.
  • 20. The method according to claim 13, wherein the memory and the encryption processor are connected directly only by the one way link.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
180748 Jan 2007 IL national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/IL2008/000070 1/16/2008 WO 00 4/28/2009
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2008/087640 7/24/2008 WO A
US Referenced Citations (158)
Number Name Date Kind
4985919 Naruse et al. Jan 1991 A
4987595 Marino et al. Jan 1991 A
5388212 Grube et al. Feb 1995 A
5530758 Marino et al. Jun 1996 A
5548646 Aziz et al. Aug 1996 A
5677952 Blakley et al. Oct 1997 A
5696822 Nachenberg Dec 1997 A
5732278 Furber et al. Mar 1998 A
5822435 Boebert et al. Oct 1998 A
5825879 Davis Oct 1998 A
5835726 Shwed et al. Nov 1998 A
5940507 Cane et al. Aug 1999 A
5946399 Kitaj et al. Aug 1999 A
5995628 Kitaj et al. Nov 1999 A
6023570 Tang et al. Feb 2000 A
6049611 Tatebayashi et al. Apr 2000 A
6134661 Topp Oct 2000 A
6240514 Inoue et al. May 2001 B1
6289377 Lalwaney et al. Sep 2001 B1
6311272 Gressel Oct 2001 B1
6317831 King Nov 2001 B1
6442607 Korn et al. Aug 2002 B1
6470449 Blandford Oct 2002 B1
6574640 Stahl Jun 2003 B1
6601126 Zaidi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6615244 Singhal Sep 2003 B1
6643701 Aziz et al. Nov 2003 B1
6738388 Stevenson et al. May 2004 B1
6738742 Badt et al. May 2004 B2
6758404 Ladyansky Jul 2004 B2
6915435 Merriam Jul 2005 B1
6931549 Ananda Aug 2005 B1
6957330 Hughes Oct 2005 B1
6963817 Ito et al. Nov 2005 B2
6966001 Obara et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970183 Monroe Nov 2005 B1
6986061 Kunzinger Jan 2006 B1
7031322 Matsuo Apr 2006 B1
7062587 Zaidi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069437 Williams Jun 2006 B2
7100048 Czajkowski et al. Aug 2006 B1
7143289 Denning et al. Nov 2006 B2
7171566 Durrant Jan 2007 B2
7200693 Jeddeloh Apr 2007 B2
7234158 Guo et al. Jun 2007 B1
7254663 Bartley et al. Aug 2007 B2
7260833 Schaeffer Aug 2007 B1
7324515 Chapman Jan 2008 B1
7366894 Kallimuthu et al. Apr 2008 B1
7523856 Block et al. Apr 2009 B2
7581097 Catherman et al. Aug 2009 B2
7631189 Ichinose et al. Dec 2009 B2
7660959 Asher et al. Feb 2010 B2
7675867 Mraz et al. Mar 2010 B1
7685436 Davis et al. Mar 2010 B2
7685636 Leake et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698470 Ruckerbauer et al. Apr 2010 B2
7716467 Deffet et al. May 2010 B1
7757074 Sundarrajan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761704 Ho et al. Jul 2010 B2
7792300 Caronni Sep 2010 B1
7814316 Hughes et al. Oct 2010 B1
7815548 Barre et al. Oct 2010 B2
7845011 Hirai Nov 2010 B2
7849330 Osaki Dec 2010 B2
7992209 Menoher et al. Aug 2011 B1
8041832 Hughes et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046443 Parker et al. Oct 2011 B2
20010033332 Kato et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020065775 Monaghan May 2002 A1
20020066018 Linnartz May 2002 A1
20020077990 Ryan Jun 2002 A1
20020114453 Bartholet et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020174010 Rice Nov 2002 A1
20020178370 Gurevich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188862 Trethewey et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020191866 Tanabe Dec 2002 A1
20020199181 Allen Dec 2002 A1
20030005295 Girard Jan 2003 A1
20030037247 Obara et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055792 Kinoshita et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061505 Sperry et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030114204 Allen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030140090 Rezvani et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140239 Kuroiwa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030159029 Brown et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030188102 Nagasoe et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217262 Kawai et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040022107 Zaidi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024710 Fernando et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040070620 Fujisawa Apr 2004 A1
20040071311 Choi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040080615 Klein et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040125077 Ashton Jul 2004 A1
20040175123 Lim et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040217890 Woodward et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040247308 Kawade Dec 2004 A1
20050015624 Ginter et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033990 Harvey et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050057774 Maruyama Mar 2005 A1
20050066186 Gentle et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085964 Knapp et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091173 Alve Apr 2005 A1
20050119967 Ishiguro et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050120214 Yeates et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050120251 Fukumori Jun 2005 A1
20050138369 Lebovitz et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165939 Nikunen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050216648 Jeddeloh Sep 2005 A1
20050264415 Katz Dec 2005 A1
20060026292 Namioka et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047887 Jeddeloh Mar 2006 A1
20060064550 Katsuragi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085354 Hirai Apr 2006 A1
20060085534 Ralston et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095629 Gower et al. May 2006 A1
20060136724 Takeshima et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060161791 Bennett Jul 2006 A1
20060165347 Mita Jul 2006 A1
20060179208 Jeddeloh Aug 2006 A1
20060220903 Zigdon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242423 Kussmaul Oct 2006 A1
20060259431 Poisner Nov 2006 A1
20060271617 Hughes et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070028027 Janzen et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070028134 Gammel et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043769 Kasahara et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055814 Jeddeloh Mar 2007 A1
20070063866 Webb Mar 2007 A1
20070094430 Speier et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070112863 Niwata et al. May 2007 A1
20070180263 Delgrosso et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070180493 Croft et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203970 Nguyen Aug 2007 A1
20070258595 Choy Nov 2007 A1
20070283297 Hein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005325 Wynn et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008207 Kellum Jan 2008 A1
20080059379 Ramaci et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065837 Toyonaga et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066192 Greco et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082835 Asher et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080120511 Naguib May 2008 A1
20080144821 Armstrong Jun 2008 A1
20080155273 Conti Jun 2008 A1
20080209216 Kelly et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080244743 Largman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263672 Chen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288790 Wilson Nov 2008 A1
20090002150 Zilberstein et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019325 Miyamoto et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090300368 Zilberstein et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100180120 Frenkel et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100278339 Frenkel et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100324380 Perkins et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110202772 Frenkel et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213990 Poisner Sep 2011 A1
20110258690 Gaffan et al. Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
1632833 Mar 2006 EP
2267986 Dec 1993 GB
2371125 Jul 2002 GB
9526085 Sep 1995 WO
0110079 Feb 2001 WO
0163879 Aug 2001 WO
2008001344 Jan 2008 WO
2008026212 Mar 2008 WO
2008087640 Jul 2008 WO
2009004611 Jan 2009 WO
2009053990 Apr 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (47)
Entry
Einey, D., “Waterfall IP Surveillance Enalber”, Jul. 2007.
Waterfall Security Solutions Ltd., “Waterfall One Way Link Technology”, 2008 http://www.waterfall-solutions.com/home/Waterfall—Technology.aspx.
Multi-State Information Sharing Analysis Center (MSISAC), “Cyber Security Procurement Language for Control Systems”, version 1.8, revision 3, Feb. 2008 http://www.msisac.org/scada/documents/4march08scadaprocure.pdf.
International Application PCT/IL2008/000886 Search Report dated Nov. 13, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2008/000070 Search Report dated Jun. 16, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/001070 Search Report dated Jul. 25, 2008.
Axis Communications., “Axis Network Cameras”, 2008 http://www.axis.com/products/video/camera/index.htm.
International Application PCT/IL2006/001499 Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2006/001499 Patentability Report dated Mar. 19, 2009.
International Application PCT/IL2007/001070 Patentability Report dated Mar. 16, 2009.
International Application PCT/IL2008/001513 Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2009.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., “Extended Unified Threat Management capabilities with new multi-layer messaging security deliver best all-inclusive security solution”, USA, Nov. 18, 2008 http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2008/utm-1-edge-upgrade-111808.html.
Innominate Security Technologies, “Press Release: Innominate joins Industrial Defender Enabled Partner Program”, Germany, Apr. 14, 2008 http://www.innominate.com/content/view/288/120/lang,en/.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/823,950 Official Action dated Jun. 22, 2009.
IL Patent Application # 177,756 Official Action dated Aug. 17, 2010.
IL Patent Application # 180,748 Official Action dated Oct. 25, 2010.
Israel Patent Application # 201473 Official Action dated May 8, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,391 Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2011.
Frenkel, L., “Unidirectional Information Transfer”, Web issue, Jun. 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,692 Official Action dated Sep. 28, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,692 Official Action dated Feb. 13, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/438,548 Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2012.
European Patent Application # 07805530.8 Search report dated Mar. 6, 2012.
EP Patent Application # 08702651.4 Search report dated May 11, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/480,692 Official Action dated May 10, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,276 Official Action dated Apr. 23, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/438,548 Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2013.
Schneier, B., “Applied Cryptography”, Chapter 15, pp. 357-358, published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc, year 1996.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/676,143 Official Action dated Jul. 13, 2012.
European Patent Application # 07849562.9 Extended Search Report dated Jun. 8, 2011.
European Patent Application # 09162276.1 Examination Report dated Apr. 15, 2011.
Israel Patent Application # 186473 Official Action dated Jun. 12, 2011.
Israel Patent Application # 185795 Official Action dated May 5, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,276 Official Action dated Apr. 5, 2011.
European Patent Application EP09162276 Search Report dated Aug. 9, 2010.
International Application PCT/IB2009/055396 Search Report dated Jul. 13, 2010.
Israel Patent Application # 180020 Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2010.
International Application PCT/IB2009/054541 Search Report dated Feb. 25, 2010.
Dierks, T., “The TLS Protocol”, version 1.0, RFC 2246, Networking group of IETF, Jan. 1999.
International Application PCT/IB2007/001535 Search Report dated Jun. 17, 2008.
International Application PCT/IB2008/001187 Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/480,692 Official Action dated Nov. 9, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/676,143 Official Action dated Oct. 25, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/438,548 Official Action dated Feb. 22, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,265 Office Action filed Nov. 22, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,265 Office Action filed Mar. 6, 2014.
EP Patent Application # 13182696.8 Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100275039 A1 Oct 2010 US