This application claims priority benefits from Swiss Patent Application No. 1538/04 filed Sept. 20, 2004 and European Patent Application No. 05013137.4 filed Jun. 17, 2005.
The invention relates to a device for attaching a boot to a sliding board, which is particularly appropriate for safety bindings for a ski boot, that is to say for devices intended for securely retaining a boot on a ski by exerting a pressure on the heel of the boot and by pressing it forward against a front attachment device called a toe-piece, while automatically freeing the boot in the event of the skier falling. It also relates to a ski to which such a device is fixed.
According to the prior art, described in patent EP0320854 for example, a ski binding comprises a heel-piece and a toe-piece for interacting respectively with the rear and the front of a ski boot. Each element of this attachment device is based on a base-plate located on the ski, which interacts with two jaws, the function of which is to retain the boot on the ski. These jaws are connected to the base-plate by means of a spring which makes it possible to free the boot when the force exerted by the boot exceeds a certain threshold. To be more precise, the toe-piece allows lateral rotation of the jaws about a vertical axis in order to free the boot in the event of torsion and allows rotation of the jaws upward about a horizontal axis in order to free the boot in the event of the skier falling backward. For these two movements, the freeing of the jaw is based on the same spring and requires only one setting. In many backward falls of the skier, these two rotations are in fact combined, a torsion movement accompanying the upward thrust, in a fall described as “backward with torsion”. The appearance on the market of skis known as carving skis, the characteristic of which is to cut the turn, has increased the risk of accidents associated with these “backward with torsion” falls, which often give rise to serious knee injuries. The ISO standard for ski bindings stipulates a rear stress of 1.25 times the set torque as a permissible overload not to be exceeded for torque at 25% in backward falls combined with torsion. This standard is often too lenient, and current bindings have a specific inadequacy with regard to these backward falls with torsion.
A first object of the present invention is a device for attaching a boot to a sliding board which improves safety during backward falls with torsion.
A second object of the present invention is a device for attaching a boot to a sliding board which remains simple and inexpensive.
The invention is based on a toe-piece of which the bearing surface between the jaw and the body on the jaw and/or the body has an inclined part to represent a specific setting of the release threshold of the binding for certain particular falls.
It is defined more precisely by the claims.
These objects, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will be explained in detail in the description below of particular non-limiting embodiments in connection with the accompanying figures, in which:
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Similarly, the jaws 3 are rotationally movable about an substantially vertical axis 6 which corresponds to a rear edge on each side of the body 2. Such an edge or vertical axis 6 of rotation can be referred to as a “knife”.
Lastly, the body 2 therefore has on its rear face a U-shaped bearing zone for the jaws 3, which consists of an upper central part 5 and two lateral parts 6. Each of these parts is located in the same substantially vertical plane transverse to the longitudinal direction along the axis 8 of the toe-piece. According to this embodiment of the invention, the U-shaped bearing zone is not entirely coplanar but also has two upper lateral parts 7, corresponding to the corners located between the parts 5 and 6, which have the characteristic of being inclined toward the front in relation to the plane defined by the parts 5 and 6. This part 7 is defined more precisely schematically as a triangular surface portion delimited by a first point 7a, at the boundary with the vertical lateral part 6, a second point 7b, at the boundary with the central horizontal upper part 5, and a third point 7c located in front of the points 7a and 7b and higher than the point 7a. From each of the points 7a and 7b, the inclination of the axes 5 and 6 changes in a discontinuous manner to form the upper lateral part 7 inclined toward the front of the toe-piece, in relation to a vertical plane transverse to the toe-piece, as is particularly visible in
The technical function of the inclined parts 7 is illustrated in connection with
Depending on the geometry of the inclined plane 7, it is possible to predefine the characteristics of the release according to the torsion and the backward force exerted during a fall. For example, the more the point 7b is displaced toward the center of the toe-piece, the more the effect of the invention will apply for weak torsion. In an extreme situation, the concept of the invention can thus be applied to a backward fall with virtually zero torsion. Likewise, the lower the point 7a, nevertheless still remaining above the axis of the rod connected to the spring of the toe-piece, that is to say the longitudinal axis 8 of the toe-piece, the more the effect of the invention will apply for a weak vertical force on the jaws in the event of a backward fall. Lastly, the angle of inclination of the surface 7, that is the positioning of the point 7c, also defines the intensity of the lowering of the torque exerted. The person skilled in the art will therefore adapt the shape of the bearing surface between the jaws 3 and the body 2 according to the needs of each particular application.
According to a variant embodiment represented in
In fact, in all cases, one of the bearing surfaces at least of the body 2 or of the jaws 3 has a surface with an inclined part, and therefore a bearing surface which is not plane overall. According to the embodiments described above, the bearing surface has at least one part of discontinuous inclination, which is different in relation to the surface as a whole. However, the same concept can be implemented with curved surfaces, a part 7, 7′ still being distinguished in relation to the bearing surface as a whole by a different inclination for the purpose of modifying the setting of the release of the binding for a specific type of fall.
Furthermore, this concept has been implemented for a specific setting of the release of a binding in the event of a backward fall with torsion but it can apply for any type of fall. It can also be implemented for an opposite setting, that is to say for the purpose of increasing the release threshold of certain types of fall.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1538/04 | Sep 2004 | CH | national |
05013137 | Jun 2005 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4989893 | Kowatsch et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5273306 | Wawra | Dec 1993 | A |
5333891 | Stritzl et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
6053523 | Quillard et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6092831 | Bauvois | Jul 2000 | A |
6779809 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6889996 | Chonier et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3905616 | Oct 1989 | DE |
0 320 854 | Aug 1996 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060061065 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |