The invention relates to a method for a first communication device to performing authenticated distance measurement between a first communication device and a second communication device. The invention also relates to a method of determining whether data stored on a first communication device is to be accessed by a second communication device. Moreover, the invention relates to a communication device for performing authenticated distance measurement to a second communication device. The invention also relates to an apparatus for playing back multimedia content comprising a communication device.
Digital media have become popular carriers for various types of data information. Computer software and audio information, for instance, are widely available on optical compact disks (CDs) and recently also DVD has gained in distribution share. The CD and the DVD utilize a common standard for the digital recording of data, software, images, and audio. Additional media, such as recordable discs, solid-state memory, and the like, are making considerable gains in the software and data distribution market.
The substantially superior quality of the digital format as compared to the analog format renders the former substantially more prone to unauthorized copying and pirating, further a digital format is both easier and faster to copy. Copying of a digital data stream, whether compressed, uncompressed, encrypted or non-encrypted, typically does not lead to any appreciable loss of quality in the data. Digital copying thus is essentially unlimited in terms of multi-generation copying. Analog data with its signal to noise ratio loss with every sequential copy, on the other hand, is naturally limited in terms of multi-generation and mass copying.
The advent of the recent popularity in the digital format has also brought about a slew of copy protection and DRM systems and methods. These systems and methods use technologies such as encryption, watermarking and right descriptions (e.g. rules for accessing and copying data).
One way of protecting content in the form of digital data is to ensure that content will only be transferred between devices if
If transfer of content is allowed, this will typically be performed in an encrypted way to make sure that the content cannot be captured illegally in a useful format.
Technology to perform device authentication and encrypted content transfer is available and is called a secure authenticated channel (SAC). Although it might be allowed to make copies of content over a SAC, the content industry is very bullish on content distribution over the Internet. This results in disagreement of the content industry on transferring content over interfaces that match well with the Internet, e.g. Ethernet.
Further, it should be possible for a user visiting his neighbor to watch a movie, which he owns, on the neighbor's big television screen. Typically, the content owner will disallow this, but it might become acceptable if it can be proved that a license holder of that movie (or a device that the license holder owns) is near that television screen.
It is therefore of interest to be able to include an authenticated distance measurement when deciding whether content should be accessed or copied by other devices.
In the article by Stefan Brands and David Chaum, “Distance-Bounding protocols”, Eurocrypt '93 (1993), Pages 344-359, integration of distance-bounding protocols with public-key identification schemes is described. Here distance measurement is described based on time measurement using challenge and response bits and with the use of a commitment protocol. This does not allow authenticated device compliancy testing and is not efficient when two devices must also authenticate each other.
It is an object of the invention to obtain a solution to the problem of performing a secure transfer of content within a limited distance.
This is obtained by a method for a first communication device to performing authenticated distance measurement between the first communication device and a second communication device, wherein the first and the second communication device share a common secret and the common secret is used for performing the distance measurement between the first and the second communication device.
Because the common secret is being used for performing the distance measurement, it can be ensured that when measuring the distance from the first communication device to the second communication device, it is the distance between the right devices that is being measured.
The method combines a distance measurement protocol with an authentication protocol. This enables authenticated device compliancy testing and is efficient, because a secure channel is anyhow needed to enable secure communication between devices and a device can first be tested on compliancy before a distance measurement is executed.
In a specific embodiment, the authenticated distance measurement is performed according to the following steps,
transmitting a first signal from the first communication device to the second communication device at a first time t1, the second communication device being adapted for receiving the first signal, generating a second signal by modifying the received first signal according to the common secret and transmitting the second signal to the first device,
receiving the second signal at a second time t2,
checking if the second signal has been modified according to the common secret,
determining the distance between the first and the second communication device according to a time difference between t1 and t2.
When measuring a distance by measuring the time difference between transmitting and receiving a signal and using a secret, shared between the first and the second communication device, for determining whether the returned signal really originated from the second communication device, the distance is measured in a secure authenticated way ensuring that the distance will not be measured to a third communication device (not knowing the secret). Using the shared secret for modifying the signal is a simple way to perform a secure authenticated distance measurement.
In a specific embodiment the first signal is a spread spectrum signal. Thereby a high resolution is obtained and it is possible to cope with bad transmission conditions (e.g. wireless environments with a lot of reflections).
In another embodiment the step of checking if the second signal has been modified according to the common secret is performed by the steps of,
generating a third signal by modifying the first signal according to the common secret,
comparing the third signal with the received second signal.
This method is an easy and simple way of performing the check, but it requires that both the first communication device and the second communication device know how the first signal is being modified using the common secret.
In a specific embodiment the first signal and the common secret are bit words and the second signal comprises information being generated by performing an XOR between the bit words. Thereby, it is a very simple operation that has to be performed, resulting in demand for few resources by both the first and the second communication device when performing the operation.
In an embodiment the common secret has been shared before performing the distance measurement, the sharing being performed by the steps of,
performing an authentication check from the first communication device on the second communication device by checking whether the second communication device is compliant with a set of predefined compliance rules,
if the second communication device is compliant, sharing the common secret by transmitting the secret to the second communication device.
This is a secure way of performing the sharing of the secret, ensuring that only devices being compliant with compliance rules can receive the secret. Further, the shared secret can afterwards be used for generating a SAC channel between the two devices. The secret could be shared using e.g. key transport mechanisms as described in ISO 11770-3. Alternatively, a key agreement protocol could be used, which e.g. is also described in ISO 11770-3.
In another embodiment the authentication check further comprises checking if the identification of the second device is compliant with an expected identification. Thereby, it is ensured that the second device really is the device that it should be. The identity could be obtained by checking a certificate stored in the second device.
The invention also relates to a method of determining whether data stored on a first communication device are to be accessed by a second communication device, the method comprising the step of performing a distance measurement between the first and the second communication device and checking whether the measured distance is within a predefined distance interval, wherein the distance measurement is an authenticated distance measurement according to the above. By using the authenticated distance measurement in connection with sharing data between devices, unauthorized distribution of content can be reduced.
In a specific embodiment the data stored on the first device is sent to the second device if it is determined that the data stored on the first device are to be accessed by the second device.
The invention also relates to a method of determining whether data stored on a first communication device are to be accessed by a second communication device, the method comprising the step of performing a distance measurement between a third communication device and the second communication device and checking whether the measured distance is within a predefined distance interval, wherein the distance measurement is an authenticated distance measurement according to the above. In this embodiment, the distance is not measured between the first communication device, on which the data are stored, and the second communication device. Instead, the distance is measured between a third communication device and the second communication device, where the third communication device could be personal to the owner of the content.
The invention also relates to a communication device for performing authenticated distance measurement to a second communication device, where the communication device shares a common secret with the second communication device and where the communication device comprises means for measuring the distance to the second device using the common secret.
In an embodiment the device comprises:
means for transmitting a first signal to a second communication device at a first time t1, the second communication device being adapted for receiving the first signal, generating a second signal by modifying the received first signal according to the common secret and transmitting the second signal,
means for receiving the second signal at a second time t2,
means for checking if the second signal has been modified according to the common secret, and
means for determining the distance between the first and the second communication device according to a time difference between t1 and t2.
The invention also relates to an apparatus for playing back multimedia content comprising a communication device according to the above.
In the following preferred embodiments of the invention will be described referring to the figures, wherein:
In the example a device is a computer, but it could e.g. also be a DVD drive, a CD drive or a Video, as long as the device comprises a communication device for performing the distance measurement.
In a specific example the distance might not have to be measured between the computer, on which the data are stored, and the other device, it could also be a third device e.g. a device being personal to the owner of the content which is within the predefined distance.
In
Then in step 209, a signal for distance measurement is transmitted to the second device 203; the second device modifies the received signal according to the secret and retransmits the modified signal back to the first device. The first device 201 measures the round trip time between the signal leaving and the signal returning and checks if the returned signal was modified according to the exchanged secret. The modification of the returned signal according to some secret will most likely be dependent on the transmission system and the signal used for distance measurement, i.e. it will be specific for each communication system (such as 1394, Ethernet, Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11, etc.).
The signal used for the distance measurement may be a normal data bit signal, but also special signals other than for data communication may be used. In an embodiment spread spectrum signals are used to be able to get high resolution and to be able to cope with bad transmission conditions (e.g. wireless environments with a lot of reflections).
In a specific example a direct sequence spread spectrum signal is used for distance measurement; this signal could be modified by XORing the chips (e.g. spreading code consisting of 127 chips) of the direct sequence code by the bits of the secret (e.g. secret consists also of 127 bits). Also, other mathematical operations as XOR could be used.
The authentication 205 and exchange of secret 207 could be performed using the protocols described in some known ISO standards ISO 9798 and ISO 11770. For example the first device 201 could authenticate the second device 203 according to the following communication scenario:
If TokenAB is replaced with the token as specified in ISO 11770-3 we at the same time can do secret key exchange. We can use this by substituting Text2 by:
In this case the second device 203 determines the key (i.e. has key control), this is also called a key transport protocol, but also a key agreement protocol could be used. This may be undesirable in which case it can be reversed, such that the first device determines the key. A secret key has now been exchanged according to step 207 in
After the distance has been measured in a secure authenticated way as described above content, data can be sent between the first and the second device in step 211 in
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02078076 | Jul 2002 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of the patent applications entitled “Secure Authenticated Distance Measurement”, filed on Nov. 11, 2014 and afforded Ser. No. 14/538,493 which claims priority pursuant to 35 USC 120, priority to and the benefit of the earlier filing date of, that patent application entitled “Secure Authenticated Distance Measurement”, filed on Jan. 21, 2005 and afforded Ser. No. 10/521,858 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,939), which claimed priority to and the benefit of the earlier filing date, as a National Stage Filing of that international patent application filed on Jun. 27, 2003 and afforded serial number PCT/IB2003/02932 (WO2004014037), which claimed priority to and the benefit of the earlier filing date of that patent application filed on Jul. 26, 2002 and afforded serial number EP 02078076.3, the contents of all of which are incorporated by reference, herein. This application is further related to that patent application entitled “Secure authenticated Distance Measurement”, filed on Jul. 24, 2009 and afforded Ser. No. 12/508,917 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,543,819), issued Sep. 24, 2013), which claimed priority to and the benefit of the earlier filing date of that patent application entitled “Secure Authenticated Distance Measurement”, filed on Jan. 21, 2005 and afforded Ser. No. 10/521,858 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,939), the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4438824 | Mueller-Scholoer | Mar 1984 | A |
4688036 | Hirano et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5126746 | Gritton | Jun 1992 | A |
5241599 | Bellovin | Aug 1993 | A |
5596641 | Ohashi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602917 | Mueller | Feb 1997 | A |
5659617 | Fischer | Aug 1997 | A |
5723911 | Glehr | Mar 1998 | A |
5778071 | Caputo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5937065 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949877 | Traw et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983347 | Brinkmeyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6085320 | Kaliski | Jul 2000 | A |
6088450 | Davis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6151676 | Cuccia et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6208239 | Muller et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6346878 | Pohlman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351235 | Stilp | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6442690 | Howard, Jr. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484948 | Sonoda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493825 | Blumenau et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526509 | Horn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6550011 | Sims | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6854056 | Benantar | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6950941 | Lee | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7200233 | Keller et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
8107627 | Epstein | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8352582 | Epstein | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8997243 | Epstein | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010008558 | Hirafuji | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010034834 | Matsuyama | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043702 | Elteto et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044786 | Ishibashi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010050990 | Sudia | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007452 | Traw et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026424 | Akashi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026576 | Das-Purkayastha et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035690 | Nakano | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020061748 | Nakakita et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078227 | Kronenberg | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020166047 | Kawamoto | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030021418 | Arakawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030542 | Von Hoffmann | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051151 | Asano | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065918 | Willey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070092 | Hawkes et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030112978 | Rodman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030184431 | Lundkvist | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220765 | Overy et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015693 | Kitazumi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040080426 | Fraenkel | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040250073 | Cukier | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050114647 | Epstein | May 2005 | A1 |
20050265503 | Rofheart et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060294362 | Epstein | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H04306760 | Oct 1992 | JP |
H0619948 | Jan 1994 | JP |
H08234658 | Sep 1996 | JP |
9170364 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H09170364 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11101035 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11208419 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000357156 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001249899 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001257672 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002124960 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002189966 | Jul 2002 | JP |
9739553 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9949378 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0152234 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0193434 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0233887 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0235036 | May 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ikeno et al “Modern Cryptography Theory” Japan, Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Nov. 15, 1997, p. 175-177. |
Modern Cryptography Theory (1986) Chapter 9, ISBN: 4-88552-064-9 (Japanese). |
Hayashi et al Encryption and Authentication Program Module , Technical Paper (Japanese) NTT R&D vol. 44, No. 10 Oct. 1, 1995. |
Stefan Brands and Devid Chaum “Distance Bounding Protocols” Eurocrypt 93, (1993) p. 344-359. |
Tim Kindber & Kan Zhang “Context Authention Using Constrained Channels” pp. 1-8, 2001. |
Hitachi Ltd., 5C Digital Transmission Content Protection White Paper Rev. 1.0 Jul. 14, 1998, p. 1013. |
Boyd et al “Protocols for Authention and Key Establishment” Spring-Verlag, Sep. 17, 2003, p. 116-120, 195, 305. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160359845 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14538493 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15229207 | US | |
Parent | 10521858 | US | |
Child | 14538493 | US |