The present invention relates to the field of semiconductor manufacturing. In particular, the present invention relates to a system and method for dynamically configuring operational characteristics of functional components within an integrated circuit.
Electronic systems and circuits have made a significant contribution towards the advancement of modern society and are utilized in a number of applications to achieve advantageous results. Numerous electronic technologies such as digital computers, calculators, audio devices, video equipment, and telephone systems facilitate increased productivity and cost reduction in analyzing and communicating data, ideas and trends in most areas of business, science, education and entertainment. Electronic systems designed to produce these results usually involve interfacing with a user and the interfacing often involves presenting information in a variety of formats (e.g., video, graphical representation of images, audio, text, etc.). The information is often proprietary and managing the distribution of proprietary information in modern electronic systems can be difficult.
Electronic systems are often utilized to present a vast variety of information for numerous different purposes. The information can be associated with a number of different activities, user experiences, presentation formats, etc. For example, electronic systems use proprietary information in the presentation of movies, music, video games, books, etc. The information can have a variety of formats and/or conform to number of different protocols. For example, information can be configured to be compatible with a variety of standards such as joint photographic expert group (JPEG) standards, moving pictures expert group (MPEG) standards, motion picture expert group audio layer 3 (MP3) standards, and/or portable document format (PDF) standards.
Digital distribution of proprietary content can be problematic. Traditional information communication and storage technologies often make copying of proprietary information relatively easy. However, developers of proprietary information usually have an economic interest in the content and desire to restrict the distribution of the information to individuals that purchase a right to access the content.
Electronic systems usually store information on a memory or storage medium. The information can be stored on a variety of storage mediums such as random access memories, hard disk drives (HDD), compact disks (CDs), digital versatile disks (DVDs), etc. The manner in which proprietary information is written and read to and from a storage medium of an end use presentation system can have significant impacts on the ability to enforce proprietary rights associated with the digital information. Traditional end use electronic systems usually have a storage medium (e.g., hard disk) that a user can readily write and read information to and from. A user typically has to load or write information to the traditional end use storage medium. Loading information onto end use hard disks can be inconvenient and problematic.
One traditional method of loading information onto an end use storage medium is to utilize a network to download the information from a remote location. Conventional network access can be inconvenient especially for portable or mobile end use platforms where reliable connections are not readily available. For example, the end use mobile platform has to be connected to a network often limiting mobility to the availability of a cable connection. Even wireless connections can have service location limitations, as some areas do not have adequate transmission and/or reception facilities. In addition, a number of technical problems can be encountered such as slow connections and/or communication interruptions. Limited bandwidth and connectivity problems can significantly impact the amount of time required to download information. Waiting for information to download can be disruptive to a user experience, especially when a user desires “instant on” presentations.
Proprietary information can be loaded on a storage medium before shipment. For example, proprietary digital content such as movies, songs etc, are usually distributed in a storage medium such as a compact disk (CD) or digital video disk (DVD). However, conventional distribution of proprietary content loaded on traditionally configured storage mediums is usually limited. For example, additional proprietary content can not typically be added to the storage medium after shipment. The amount of proprietary information stored on a particular storage medium (e.g., CD) is also often relatively limited. For example, a CD is usually limited to a relatively few songs (e.g., a limited number of songs from a particular artist) without the ability to offer an increase in proprietary content access for that CD at a later date.
The present invention facilitates convenient and secure distribution of proprietary content. A present secure content enabled drive system and method permits flexible use of storage medium for both protected distribution of information and user definable storage use. A significant amount of proprietary information with regulated access can be distributed on protected portion of the storage medium while still providing storage resources for discretionary utilization by an end user. In addition to protecting information in the protected information portion, seamless and intuitive authorized interaction between information the protected content and the unprotected information is permitted. In one embodiment a digital rights management method includes creating a secure content enabled drive with protected storage locations and unprotected storage locations. Initial digital rights authorization is established to access secure content stored in said protected storage locations. The initial digital rights authorization to access secure content stored in said protected storage locations can be revised.
A secure content enabled drive digital rights revision process facilitates alteration of digital access rights remotely. For example, if a remote user successfully completes prerequisite authorization requirements, secure content enabled drive digital rights revision process 500 provides an updated digital rights indicator permitting access to protected information via a protection interface on a protected storage medium (e.g., a SCED). For example, a communication link is established for communicating a digital rights indicator to a remote protected storage medium (e.g., SCED). A digital rights indicator revision authorization process for revising digital rights to a protected storage medium (e.g., SCED) is performed and a revised digital rights indicator is forwarded to the protected storage medium (e.g., SCED) if the digital rights indicator revision authorization process is successful.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention by way of example and not by way of limitation. The drawings referred to in this specification should be understood as not being drawn to scale except if specifically noted.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions which follow are presented in terms of procedures, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means generally used by those skilled in data processing arts to effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps include physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic, optical, or quantum signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present application, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing”, “computing”, “calculating”, “determining”, “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar processing device (e.g., an electrical, optical, or quantum, computing device), that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (e.g., electronic) quantities. The terms refer to actions and processes of the processing devices that manipulate or transform physical quantities within a computer system's component (e.g., registers, memories, other such information storage, transmission or display devices, etc.) into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within other components.
In addition to protecting information in protected information portion 130, protection interface 110 permits seamless and intuitive authorized interaction with information in the protected content and the unprotected information. In one exemplary implementation, protection interface 110 is a micro operating system or micro kernel and provides a number of operating system functions. For example, coordinating interactions between protected information storage medium 100 and an information presentation system (e.g., a computer system, a video game console, an audio system, a TV system, etc.). The protection interface 110 can also enable an “instant on” user experience in accessing the authorized information in protected information storage portion 130.
In one embodiment, protection interface 110 also includes instructions for providing a unified look and feel graphical user interface (GUI) with content indicators (e.g., icons, drop down menus, tabs, etc.) corresponding to access authorized content stored in the protected content portion. A GUI can be organized in a convenient hierarchical architecture.
With reference again to
In one embodiment, content on the protected portion is restricted to access by trusted devices. In one exemplary implementation, a protection interface (e.g., protection interface 110) and a trusted device include information (e.g., digital keys and algorithm instructions) for participating in a trusted device verification protocol. The trusted device verification protocol is a secure handshake that is computationally very difficult to crack. The protection interface verifies device information corresponds to information associated with trusted machines. For example, each machine capable of interacting with the SCED includes a company ID, model ID, user ID, unique player ID and/or a secret SCED ID and the protection interface verifies the information corresponds to information associated with a trusted machine. Individual or models of trusted machines can be revoked by future releases of a SCED device if they are determined to be unsecure (e.g., get hacked, a Trojan is released, etc.)
In one exemplary implementation, a protected section or portion resides in an ATA-5 hard disk drive (HDD) called a host protected area (HPA). This limits the SCED to operating with machines that can unlock the HPA of the HDD with special ATA-5 commands. The HPA area includes its own partition and encrypted file system. The file-system is encrypted so that data in the protected partitioned portion is meaningless until the file-system is unlocked and decrypted. The protected portion includes algorithm instructions for decrypting the file system. After successfully completing a trusted machine verification handshake process, a trusted machine is able to participate in a file system decryption process. The file system decryption algorithm includes a handshaking process to unlock the file system. Initially ATA-5 HPA security handshaking protocol is performed followed by performance of an additional 3-way handshaking (e.g., 128 bit handshaking). The file-system includes protected content which can be encrypted at the file level (e.g., each individual file can be encrypted). It is appreciated that the present invention is not limited to ATA implementations and can be implemented on a wide variety of memory formats (e.g., SATA, flash, etc.).
In one embodiment, each file on a protected portion of a drive is encrypted in a special way. In one exemplary implementation, a 2 pass encryption is utilized. The first pass uses a real-time decryptable algorithm so it can be played back in real time. A second pass locks the file while access is unauthorized (e.g., unpaid for). A file can be designated as having a one of a variety of states at any given time. For example, a file can be designated as locked forever and can not be unlocked. A file can be designated as locked but available and can be unlocked. Alternatively a file can be designated as unlocked for everyone and a trusted machine and user can access the file (e.g., to play back). In one exemplary implementation, a file can be designated as unlocked restricted and only certain users or machines can view the content. Unlocked restricted can be restricted in a variety of ways, including by user, by machine, limited by time (e.g., content can be viewed until a certain expiration date or only at certain times), or play limited (e.g., content can only be viewed a certain number of times). If access rights to an unlocked file “expires” the file reverts back to a locked available designation or lock forever designation. In one embodiment, the file also has information about price and relock state.
After successfully participating in the file decryption processes a trusted machine can access authorized protected content. Unlocked content can be protected by a variety of mechanisms. In one embodiment, after a file is unlocked it is marked and limited to being played back on trusted device. For example, protected content access is limited to the trusted machine (e.g., designated with a certain ID) that unlocked and decrypted the content. In one embodiment, trusted devices have a limited number of output options as determined by the protected content. Restrictions on content output or presentation can be made in a variety of ways, including limiting output to Macrovision protected video output, non-digital video output or HDCP restricted digital video output, CGMS-A protection, quality (e.g., resolution, frequency, bits, etc.) limits on video and audio digital or analog, and/or watermarking requirements. For example, if a trusted machine detects a protected file has a watermark, the watermark identification or signaling can be utilized to determine whether a file is legitimately unlocked.
The components of computer system 200 cooperatively operate to conveniently and securely provide a variety of protected content. Communications bus 291, 292, 293, 294, 295 and 297 communicate information. Central processor 201 processes information. Main memory 202 stores information and instructions for the central processor 201. Removable protected data storage device 204 is a protected information storage medium (e.g., similar to protected information storage medium 100) and stores protected information (e.g., functioning as a large reservoir of protected content). Computer system 200 is utilized to present (e.g., display) authorized information from removable protected data storage device 201. Input device 206 provides a mechanism for inputting information and for pointing to or highlighting information on display 220. Signal communication port 208 provides a communication interface to exterior devices (e.g., an interface with a network). Display device 220 displays information in accordance with data stored in frame buffer 215. Graphics processor 211 processes graphics commands from central processor 201 and provides the resulting data to graphics buffers 215 for storage and retrieval by display monitor 220. In one embodiment, a graphics processor can present information from removable protected data storage device 204 utilizing a micro operating system of a protection interface included in removable protected data storage device 204 (e.g., without reliance on central processor or other operating system).
In step 310, a storage medium is partitioned into protected and unprotected portions. In one embodiment of the present invention, a hard disk is partitioned to reserve a percentage of available storage space for protected content and a percentage of available storage space for unprotected content. In one exemplary implementation, a portion of the storage locations are reserved for a protection interface. The portion of memory reserved for the protection interface can be a read only portion.
At step 320, content is stored in the protected portion. In one embodiment, a variety of proprietary content is stored in the protected portion. For example, movies, songs, video games and other entertainment content can be stored in the protected portion. A variety of different proprietary content can be “bundled” for convenient distribution on a single storage medium (e.g., hard disk).
In step 330, a protection interface is loaded onto the storage medium, wherein the protection interface prevents unauthorized access to the content stored in the protected portion. In one embodiment, the protected interface also provides operating system functions including memory management functions (e.g., maintains organization of files, directories, etc.), hardware interaction functions (e.g., control a disk drive, printer, etc.), and user interface functions. The protected portion interface can include instructions for providing a unified look and feel graphical user interface (GUI) with content indicators corresponding to permissible content stored in the protected content portion.
In one embodiment of the present invention, content is locked when it is loaded in the protected portion. The content can also be encrypted in the protected portion. Instructions are included in the protection interface for authorized unlocking and decrypting the content in the protected portion. In addition an unlocked file can be marked to prevent access by an untrusted machine.
In step 410, a protected storage medium (e.g., a secure content enabled drive) is created with protected storage locations and unprotected storage locations. In one embodiment, creating a secure content enabled drive includes performing a content protected storage medium creation method (e.g., content protected storage medium creation method 300). For example, a storage medium is partitioned into protected and unprotected portions, proprietary content is stored in the protected portion, and a protection interface is loaded onto the storage medium. The protection interface prevents unauthorized access to the content stored in the protected portion. In one exemplary implementation, a content protected storage medium similar to content protected storage medium 100 is created.
Initial digital rights authorization to access secure content stored in the protected storage locations are established in step 420. In one embodiment, establishing initial digital rights authorization includes storing a digital rights indicator on the protected storage medium, wherein the digital rights indicator indicates digital rights to access information stored in the protected storage locations. The digital rights indicator can indicate certain files within the protected storage area are accessible via the protection interface and certain files are not accessible. In one embodiment, the secure content includes movies, songs and/or video games and a digital rights indicator indicates which movies, songs and/or video games are accessible. For example, a SCED is loaded with a variety of songs from a plurality of categories (e.g., classical music, rock and roll music, country western music, etc.) and a digital rights indicator is set to indicate a purchaser of the SCED is authorized to access a variety of songs from one category (e.g., can access classical music songs). In one exemplary implementation, the digital rights indicator is utilized in encryption and decryption of protected information (e.g., utilized as a decryption key).
In step 430, the initial digital rights authorization to access secure content stored in the protected storage locations are revised. In one embodiment, revising the initial digital rights authorization includes performing a secure content enabled drive digital rights revision process. For example, a digital rights indicator is altered to indicate a user can access a variety of songs from an additional category (e.g., a user can access both classical music songs and country western songs). In one exemplary implementation, the digital rights indicator is a registry key associated with the secure content enabled drive. The registry key can also be stored in a centralized system remote from the secure content enabled drive.
The components of digital rights management system 470 cooperatively operate to track and modify digital rights. Digital rights server 471 executes instructions, including instructions for tracking and modifying digital rights to protected content on remote secure content enabled drive 490 with a protected storage portion and an unprotected storage portion. Digital rights tracking system 472 stores instructions and data, including instructions for tracking and modifying digital rights to protected content on a remote secure content enabled drive with a protected storage portion and an unprotected storage portion. Bus 473 communicates information between digital rights server 471 and digital rights tracking system 472.
In one embodiment, digital rights server 471 is utilized to establish initial digital rights authorization to access secure content stored in said protected storage locations. For example, digital rights server 471 creates an initial registry key for indicating digital rights to protected content on an SCED (e.g., SCED 490) and utilizes digital rights tracking system 472 to track the initial registry key information. In one exemplary implementation, digital rights tracking system 472 is a database and tracks digital rights indicators or keys. For example, digital rights tracking system 472 tracks the digital rights for each SCED and user. If a SCED is damaged or destroyed, a centralized record of SCED and/or user digital access rights is maintained. Digital rights server 471 is also utilized to perform a secure content enabled drive digital rights revision process to revise digital rights on an SCED (e.g.; SCED 490).
In step 510, a communication link is established for communicating a digital rights indicator to a remote protected storage medium (e.g., SCED). In one embodiment, establishing a communication link includes receiving a request for a revised digital rights indicator. For example, a digital rights server (e.g., digital rights server 471) receives a request for a revised digital rights indicator and engages in a handshaking protocol to establish a communication link. It is appreciated that the present invention is readily adaptable for utilization with a variety of communication platforms, including wired connection and wireless connection. The communication link can be established on the Internet.
In step 520, a digital rights indicator revision authorization process for revising digital rights to a protected storage medium (e.g., SCED) is performed. In one embodiment, the digital rights indicator revision process includes verifying a request is from a valid requester (e.g., a trusted machine). A determination is made if the valid requester has successfully completed a digital rights purchase process. A digital rights purchase process includes receiving an indication of requested protected content access, forwarding a price for the requested protected content access and determining if the price is paid. If the valid requester has successfully completed a digital rights purchase process, a digital rights indicator (e.g., registry key) corresponding to purchased digital access rights is created.
In step 530 a revised digital rights indicator is forwarded to the protected storage medium (e.g., SCED) if the digital rights indicator revision authorization process is successful. The digital rights indicator is loaded on the protected storage medium for use in authorized access to protected content included in the protected storage medium. For example, the digital rights indicator can include a sequence of bits (e.g., binary logical values) utilized as a key in unlocking and decrypting proprietary content included in a protected information portion of a protected storage medium.
It is appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in a variety of embodiments. In one exemplary implementation the present invention can be utilized in processing systems utilized to provide a variety of graphics applications including video games. For example, the present invention can be utilized to distribute content for use in a game console, personal computer, personal digital assistant, cell phone or any number of platforms for implementing a video game. It is also appreciated that references to video game application implementations are exemplary and the present invention is not limited to these implementations.
Thus, the present invention enables secure and convenient distribution of proprietary content on flexibly usable storage medium. A significant amount of proprietary information can be distributed on a protected portion of the storage medium while regulating access to the proprietary content and still enabling storage resources for discretionary utilization by an end user. In addition to protecting information in the protected information portion, seamless and intuitive authorized interaction between information the protected content and the unprotected information is permitted. A protection interface can provide a Micro-operating system that permits authorized content presentation (e.g., video, audio, etc.) without requirement of another operating system.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5237616 | Abraham et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5552897 | Mandelbaum et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5623546 | Hardy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629980 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5721829 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5757911 | Shibata | May 1998 | A |
5857020 | Peterson, Jr. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861906 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880733 | Horvitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5973680 | Ueda | Oct 1999 | A |
6005636 | Westerman | Dec 1999 | A |
6016348 | Blatter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028585 | Ishii et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6069647 | Sullivan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6115819 | Anderson | Sep 2000 | A |
6141754 | Choy | Oct 2000 | A |
6298445 | Shostack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314409 | Schneck et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6367019 | Ansell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389538 | Gruse et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389541 | Patterson | May 2002 | B1 |
6398245 | Gruse et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6550011 | Sims, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580916 | Weisshaar et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597380 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615192 | Tagawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622148 | Noble et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651171 | England et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6708161 | Tenorio et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742116 | Matsui et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748537 | Hughes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772335 | Curtis et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785820 | Muttik et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788800 | Carr et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807534 | Erickson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6832319 | Bell et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6865555 | Novak | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891953 | DeMello et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6922740 | Kondratiev et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6948073 | England et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957343 | Ripley et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6980652 | Braitberg et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990513 | Belfiore et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003675 | Benaloh | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010808 | Leung et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020688 | Sykes, Jr. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035827 | Ezaki | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036020 | Thibadeau | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047411 | DeMello et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7065216 | Benaloh et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065506 | Phillipo et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065651 | Evans | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069449 | Weaver, III et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073071 | Ellison et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7093298 | Rodriquez et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095853 | Morishita | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107462 | Fransdonk | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111169 | Ripley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120250 | Candelore | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120868 | Salesin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139811 | Lev Ran et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7150031 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152047 | Nagel | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155733 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159120 | Muratov et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181016 | Cross et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191153 | Braitberg et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197648 | Evans | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200593 | Shimomura et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225333 | Peinado et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225340 | Asahi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228427 | Fransdonk | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242771 | Shiragami et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7299209 | Collier | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7340056 | Morcel | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353543 | Ohmori et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370205 | Ogino | May 2008 | B2 |
7370364 | Dobbins et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376624 | Cochran et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383205 | Peinado et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395333 | Saulpaugh et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7395438 | Parks et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7536386 | Samji et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7543160 | Adams et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549044 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7606818 | Bachmann et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606918 | Holzman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607024 | Staring et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644446 | Strom et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7689510 | Lamkin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7933409 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20010020274 | Shambroom | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010021926 | Schneck et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020002468 | Spagna et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012432 | England et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020077986 | Kobata et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077992 | Tobin | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099663 | Yoshino et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030061477 | Kahn et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030097655 | Novak | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108199 | Pinder et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140228 | Binder | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149989 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152364 | Wajs | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161473 | Fransdonk | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030215091 | Kambayashi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225796 | Matsubara | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229845 | Salesin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015426 | Tadayon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040083366 | Nachenberg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133794 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133803 | Rabin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148523 | Lambert | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193902 | Vogler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050008130 | Wakamatsu | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025312 | Rijkaert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058291 | Candelore | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086478 | Peinado et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091511 | Nave et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111663 | Lotspiech et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119967 | Ishiguro et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132179 | Glaum et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050289076 | Lambert | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005257 | Tohru et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064605 | Giobbi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060149567 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190621 | Kamperman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224902 | Bolt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070033419 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070192111 | Chasen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208992 | Koren | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080148063 | Hanko et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080178081 | Reshef et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Blaze, A Cryptographic File System for Unix, 1993, ACM, Computer and Communication Security Nov. 1993, pp. 9-16. |
CyberLink PowerCinema Linux Featuring Instant-on Capability Enables Digital Home Entertainment for CE and PC; Press Release on Oct. 26, 2004; http://www.cyberlink.com/eng/press—room/view—747.html. |
Felton, E. W. 2003. A Skeptical View of DRM and Fair Use. Commun. ACM 46, 4 (Apr. 2003) 56-59. |
Licenses for your media files are corrupted, Microsoft, Aug. 21, 2007. |
Microsoft Corporation, “A Technical Overview of Windows Media DRM 10 for Device”, pp. 1-20, Retrieved from http://download.microsoft.com/download/b/7/a/b7a9aeae-d9f2-435b-a2dc-f3b0909d1d62/A—Technical—Overview—of—WM—DRM—10—for—Devices.doc. |
SearchSecurity.com, Content Scrambling System (CSS), May 2000, Retrieved from http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/Content-Scrambling-System?vgnextfmt=print. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,545, filed Aug. 11, 2005; Title: Method and System for Accessing Content on Demand. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/013,745, filed Dec. 15, 2004; Title: Content server and method of storing content. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/014,001, filed Dec. 15, 2004; Title: Content Server and Method of Providing Content Therefrom. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/112,364, filed Apr. 22, 2005; Title: Content Keys for Authorizing Access to Content. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/193,051, filed Jul. 29, 2005; Title: User Interface for Presentation of Content. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/202,844, filed Aug. 11, 2005; Title: Method and System for Registering and Activating Content. |
Secure Video Processor Challenge—Response Protocol Top-Level Description, SVPLA, Apr. 15, 2004, 8 pages. |
SVP Open Content Protection System Technical Overview, SVPLA, Jan. 3, 2005, 51 pages. |