This disclosure relates to the technical field of encryption and decryption of data. More specifically, this disclosure relates to systems and methods for performing secure analytics using a homomorphic encryption including analytics for machine learning models.
Advantageously, a homomorphic encrypted analytic can execute on a server in an unsecure environment and there by obfuscate information about the analytic that could be derived by examination of the analytic. This information could include the information about computation being performed, intellectual property, proprietary information, sensitive information, or protected classes of information. Specifically, the analytics include trained machine learning models, sent in a homomorphic encrypted scheme, and executed in an unsecure environment. Thereby, the encrypted analytic can be sent to an untrusted environment, be evaluated against data under the untrusted party's control, and generate an encrypted prediction, classification or other result which can be transmitted back to a trusted environment. The decrypted result will be the same as if the unencrypted machine analytic operated on the data.
With development of computer technologies, many sensitive data, such as financial information and medical records can be kept on remote servers or cloud-based computing resources. Authorized users can access the sensitive data using applications running, for example, on their personal computing devices. Typically, personal computing devices are connected, via data networks, to servers or cloud-based computing resources. Therefore, the sensitive data can be subject to unauthorized access.
Encryption techniques, such as a homomorphic encryption, can be applied to the sensitive data to prevent unauthorized access. The encryption techniques can be used to protect “data in use”, “data in rest”, and “data in transit”. A homomorphic encryption is a form of encryption in which a specific algebraic operation (generally referred to as addition or multiplication) performed on plaintext, is equivalent to another operation performed on ciphertext. For example, in Partially Homomorphic Encryption (PHE) schemes, multiplication in ciphertext is equal to addition of the same values in plaintext.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described in the Detailed Description below. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Generally, the present disclosure is directed to the technology for secure data processing. Some embodiments of the present disclosure may facilitate a secure transmission of machine learning models from a client device to remote computing resource(s) for performing trained machine learning models over an instance(s) of data and secure transmission of results of the analysis from the computing resources back to the client device. These analytics include machine learning models including but not limited to neural network models and decision tree models where the generated results can be securely transmitted back to a client device.
According to one example embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for performing secure machine learning models using homomorphic encryption is provided. The method may include receiving, from a client, by at least one server from a client, at least one machine learning data structure. The at least one machine learning data structure can be encrypted using a homomorphic encryption scheme. The method may further include extracting, by the at least one server, an instance wherein an instance includes but is not limited to data, derived analytic results, and results of a term generator. The method may further include evaluating, by the at least one server, the at least one machine learning data structure over the instance utilizing a trained machine learning model to obtain at least one encrypted result. The method may further allow sending, by the at least one server, the at least one encrypted result to the client, wherein the client is configured to decrypt the at least one encrypted result using the homomorphic encryption scheme.
In some embodiments, the homomorphic encryption scheme includes a fully homomorphic encryption scheme. The fully homomorphic encryption scheme may include at least one of a Brakerski/Fan-Vercauteren and a Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song cryptosystem.
In some embodiments, the at least one machine learning data structure is generated based on an associated trained machine learning model. The encrypted value can be obtained using the homomorphic encryption scheme.
In certain embodiments, the machine learning model is a neural network. The at least one machine learning data structure includes neural network weights associated with the neural network.
In other embodiments, the machine learning model includes a decision tree. The at least one machine learning data structure includes a feature vector. In various embodiments, the feature vectors are binary values.
According to one example embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for performing a secure machine learning model results using homomorphic encryption is provided. The system may include at least one processor and a memory storing processor-executable codes, wherein the at least one processor can be configured to implement the operations of the above-mentioned method for performing secure analytics using homomorphic encryption.
According to yet another example embodiment of the present disclosure, the operations of the above-mentioned method for performing secure analytics using a homomorphic encryption are stored on a machine-readable medium comprising instructions, which when implemented by one or more processors perform the recited operations.
Other example embodiments of the disclosure and aspects will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements.
The technology disclosed herein is concerned with methods and systems for performing secure analytics over data source using a homomorphic encryption. Embodiments of the present disclosure may facilitate a secure transmission of analytics from a client device to computing resource(s) providing a target data source and secure transmission of results of analytics from the computing resource(s) back to the client device.
Some embodiments of the present disclosure may be used to encrypt an analytic on a client device using homomorphic encryption techniques. The encrypted analytic can be sent to computing resource(s) providing desired data source(s). The encrypted analytics can be performed over desired data source(s) to produce encrypted results. The encrypted results can be returned to the client device and decrypted using the homomorphic encryption techniques. Embodiments of the present disclosure may allow performing of an analytic over desired data sources in a secure and private manner because neither content of the analytic nor results of the analytic are revealed to a data owner, observer, or attacker.
According to one example embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for performing secure analytics using a homomorphic encryption may commence with acquiring, by a client, an analytic, at least one analytic parameter associated with the analytic, and an encryption scheme. The encryption scheme may include a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption. The method may further include generating, by the client and using the encryption scheme, at least one analytical vector based on the analytic and the at least one analytic parameter. The method may further include sending, by the client, the at least one analytical vector and the encryption scheme, to at least one server.
The method may also include acquiring, by the at least one server, a data set for performing the analytic. The method may allow extracting, by the at least one server and based on the encryption scheme, a set of terms from the data set. The method may further include, evaluating, by the at least one server, the at least one analytical vector over the set of terms to obtain at least one encrypted result. The method may also include sending, by the at least one server, the at least one encrypted result to the client. The method may also include decrypting, by the client and based on the encryption scheme, the at least one encrypted result to generate at least one result of the analytic.
In other embodiments, the analytics can include ML (machine learning) models executing on a server resident or coupled instance in a non-trusted environment. An instance includes but is not limited to data, derived analytic results, and the result of a term generator. ML models are an extension to the encrypted analytics. The ML models can take different forms depending upon the particular machine learning algorithm being used. However, in all cases they contain data structures, including but not limited to vectors of weights for a neural network or a tree of features and splits for a decision tree. The data structures are used by the ML models to generate a result about a previously unseen instance of a problem. Like models, results and instances can take different forms depending on the use case. For example, an instance could be a picture and the result could be a classification of the picture as “contains a face” or “does not contain a face;” or an instance could be the historical prices for a stock over the past year and the result could be the price of that stock in three months.
Alternatively, the analytics may not be as complicated as a training machine learning model for a neural network or a decision tree. The ML analytics can include computing a histogram, an average, or executing a regression modeling calculating a result based on the data.
A ML model may be created using a training algorithm, whose input is a large number of instances called “training data.” The training algorithm is run over this training data to fill in the data structure that constitutes the ML model, in such a way that the model makes good predictions, classifications, or other results over the instances in the training data. Once the ML model training is complete, the finished ML model, including the trained data structures, can be saved and used to make predictions, classifications, or other results against new instances of data encountered in the future. This saved ML model can also be executed by other parties, who can use the ML model to make predictions about instances they encounter.
Transmitting to or otherwise sharing the ML model with other parties carries risks, because it is possible to learn about the ML model by studying the data structures and data coefficients that comprise the ML model. For many ML models, a “model inversion attack” can be used to reconstruct some of the training data from the ML model. If that training data contained sensitive information, this attack can expose training data to unauthorized parties. Many ML models are also susceptible to “adversarial machine learning” techniques, which study the decision-making process represented by the ML model and look for ways to “fool” the ML model into making a bad result for some new instance. Further, many organizations consider their trained ML models to be proprietary information.
The disclosed systems and methods include techniques for using homomorphic encryption to encrypt parts of an already-trained ML (machine learning) model. Such systems and methods protects against the attacks described above by denying the attacker the ability to analyze the contents of the model as well as exposure of the model itself which may be considered proprietary. The disclosed systems and methods replaces the standard operations used during analysis with homomorphic operations, which makes it possible to use the encrypted ML model to generate encrypted results about new instances. The encrypted results can be transferred to a trusted or secure environment for decryption using a compatible homomorphic encryption model, and the ML model owner can decide whether to keep the result private or share it with the other parties. Below are two examples of how this invention can be used to homomorphically encrypt two types of machine learning models: a neural network and a decision tree.
Referring now to the drawings, various embodiments are described in which like reference numerals represent like parts and assemblies throughout the several views. It should be noted that the reference to various embodiments does not limit the scope of the claims attached hereto. Additionally, any examples outlined in this specification are not intended to be limiting and merely set forth some of the many possible embodiments for the appended claims.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the server(s) 110 may be configured to store or provide access to at least one data source(s) 115. In certain embodiments, the server(s) 110 may include a standalone computing device. In various embodiments, the data source(s) 115 may be located on a single server(s) 110 or distributed over multiple server(s) 110. The data source(s) 115 may include plaintext data, deterministically encrypted data, semantically encrypted data, or a combination of thereof.
In some embodiments, the server(s) 110 may be implemented as cloud-based computing resource shared by multiple users. The cloud-based computing resource(s) can include hardware and software available at a remote location and accessible over a network (for example, the Internet). The cloud-based computing resource(s) can be dynamically re-allocated based on demand. The cloud-based computing resources may include one or more server farms/clusters including a collection of computer servers which can be co-located with network switches and/or routers.
In various embodiments, the client(s) 105 can make certain client inquires within the environment 100. For example, the client(s) 105 may be configured to send analytics to the server(s) 110 to be performed over the data source(s) 115. The server(s) 110 can be configured to perform the analytics over the data source(s) 115 and return the results of analytics to the client(s) 105.
To protect the content of the analytics, the client(s) 105 can be configured to encrypt the analytics using a homomorphic encryption scheme. The homomorphic encryption scheme can include a partially homomorphic encryption scheme and fully homomorphic encryption scheme. The partially homomorphic encryption scheme can include one of a Rivest, Shamir and Adleman cryptosystem, Elgamal cryptosystem, Benaloh cryptosystem, Goldwasser-Micali cryptosystem, and Pallier cryptosystem. The analytics can be encrypted with a public (encryption) key of the homomorphic encryption scheme. The encrypted analytics and the public key can be sent to the server 110. The encrypted analytics can be only decrypted with a private (decryption) key of the homomorphic encryption scheme. The decryption key can be kept on the client(s) 105 and never provided to the server(s) 110.
To protect the content of the results of the analytic, the server(s) 110 can be further configured to perform the encrypted analytics on the data source using the same homographic encryption scheme and the public key received from the client 105 and, thereby, obtain encrypted results of the analytics. The encrypted results can be sent to the client(s) 105. The client(s) 105 can decrypt the encrypted results using the private key. Because the private key is always kept on the client(s) 105, neither encrypted analytic nor encrypted results of the analytics can be decrypted on the server 110 or when intercepted while in transition between the client(s) 105 and the server(s) 110.
The scheme 200 may include a term generation (TG) function 210. The term generation function 210 can be used to extract a set of term elements {T} of analytic A that correspond to an analytic parameter A_P. For, example, if the analytic parameter A_P is a frequency distribution for database elements in <row:column> pairs where row=Y, then the set {T} reflects the frequency distribution of these elements from the database.
The scheme 200 may further include a keyed hash function H(T) 220. The hash function H(T) can be used to obtain a set H(T)={H(T): T in {T}}. The set H(T) is the range of the hash function H(T) over the set of term elements {T}. The keyed hash function H(T) can be associated with a public key used for the encryption. The number of distinct elements in the set H(T) is equal to the number of distinct elements in the set of term elements {T}.
The scheme 200 may further include an analytical vector construction module 230. The module 230 can be used to construct an analytical vector A_V for the analytic parameter A_P. The desired size s of the analytical vector A_V can be selected to be greater than the number of distinct elements in the set of term elements {T}. For index j=0, . . . , (s−1): if H(T)=j for a term element T in the set {T}, then vector component A_V[j]=E(B_j) where B_j is a nonzero bit mask corresponding to the term element T, wherein E is the homographic encryption scheme. If there is no T in {T} such that H(T)=j, then A_V[j]=E(0). In this manner, the analytical vector A_V includes encryptions of nonzero bitmasks for only the term elements present in the set {T}. The analytic A cannot be recovered from the analytical vectors {A_V} without a private key associated with the homomorphic encryption scheme E.
The client(s) 105 can be further configured to send the analytical vectors {A_V}, the term generation function TG, and the hash function H(T) with the public key to the server(s) 110.
In some embodiments, the server(s) 110 can be configured to extract a set of term elements {T} from the data source(s) 115 using the term generation function TG and the keyed hash function H(T). The server(s) 110 can be further configured to evaluate the encrypted analytical vectors {A_V} over the set of term elements {T} to produce encrypted results E(R). The server(s) 110 can be further configured to send the encrypted results E(R) to the client 105.
The client 105 can be configured to decrypt the encrypted results E(R) in order to obtain the results R using the private key of the homomorphic encryption scheme E. Because the analytical vector {A_V} includes nonzero entries for terms in set {T}, the homomorphic properties of E ensure that only results corresponding to the nonzero elements of the analytical vector {A_V} are present in results R.
The method 300 may commence in block 305 with receiving, by at least one server, from a client, at least one analytic vector, a term generation function, and a keyed hash function. The at least one analytic vector can be encrypted using the homomorphic encryption scheme. The homomorphic encryption scheme can include a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption.
In block 310, the method 300 may proceed with extracting, by the at least one server, a set of term components from a data set using the term generation function and the keyed hashed function.
In block 315, the method 300 may evaluate, by the at least one server, the at least one analytic vector over the set of term components to obtain at least one encrypted result.
In block 320, the method may proceed with sending, by the at least one server, the at least one encrypted result to the client. The client can be configured to decrypt the at least one encrypted result using the homomorphic encryption scheme.
The components shown in
Mass data storage 430, which can be implemented with a magnetic disk drive, solid state drive, or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit 410. Mass data storage 430 stores the system software for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure for purposes of loading that software into main memory 420.
Portable storage device 440 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a flash drive, floppy disk, compact disk, digital video disc, or Universal Serial Bus (USB) storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 400 of
User input devices 460 can provide a portion of a user interface. User input devices 460 may include one or more microphones, an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. User input devices 460 can also include a touchscreen. Additionally, the computer system 400 as shown in
Graphics display system 470 include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Graphics display system 470 is configurable to receive textual and graphical information and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripheral devices 480 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system.
The components provided in the computer system 400 of
The processing for various embodiments may be implemented in software that is cloud-based. In some embodiments, the computer system 400 is implemented as a cloud-based computing environment, such as a virtual machine operating within a computing cloud. In other embodiments, the computer system 400 may itself include a cloud-based computing environment, where the functionalities of the computer system 400 are executed in a distributed fashion. Thus, the computer system 400, when configured as a computing cloud, may include pluralities of computing devices in various forms, as will be described in greater detail below.
In general, a cloud-based computing environment is a resource that typically combines the computational power of a large grouping of processors (such as within web servers) and/or that combines the storage capacity of a large grouping of computer memories or storage devices. Systems that provide cloud-based resources may be utilized exclusively by their owners or such systems may be accessible to outside users who deploy applications within the computing infrastructure to obtain the benefit of large computational or storage resources.
The cloud may be formed, for example, by a network of web servers that comprise a plurality of computing devices, such as the computer system 400, with each server (or at least a plurality thereof) providing processor and/or storage resources. These servers may manage workloads provided by multiple users (e.g., cloud resource customers or other users). Typically, each user places workload demands upon the cloud that vary in real-time, sometimes dramatically. The nature and extent of these variations typically depends on the type of business associated with the user.
As shown in
The server(s) 520 can operate in an untrusted environment where an unencrypted machine analytic could be evaluated to learn information about computation being performed, intellectual property, proprietary information, sensitive information, or protected classes of information about ML analytic or the result of the ML analytic operation on instance(s) 530. For the purpose of this disclosure, an instance(s) 530 is input data used by a trained ML analytic to make a prediction, classification, or generate another result. The server(s) 520 receives homomorphically encrypted data structures 516 associated with a trained ML analytic, and executed in the homomorphically encrypted scheme. Thus, information about the ML analytic is obfuscated from parties in the untrusted environment.
In some embodiments, the server(s) 520 may be configured to store or provide access to at least one instance(s) 530. In certain embodiments, the server(s) 520 may include a standalone computing device. In various embodiments, the instance(s) 530 may be located on a single server(s) 520 or distributed over multiple server(s) 520. The instance(s) 530 may include plaintext data.
In some embodiments, the server(s) 520 may be implemented as cloud-based computing resource shared by multiple users. The cloud-based computing resource(s) can include hardware and software available at a remote location and accessible over a network (for example, the Internet). The cloud-based computing resource(s) can be dynamically re-allocated based on demand. The cloud-based computing resources may include one or more server farms/clusters including a collection of computer servers which can be co-located with network switches and/or routers.
In various embodiments, the client(s) 510 can make certain client inquires within the environment 500. For example, the client(s) 510 may be configured to send ML analytics to the server(s) 520 to be performed over the instance(s) 530. The server(s) 520 can be configured to perform the ML analytics over the instance (s) 530 and return the results of ML analytics to the client(s) 510.
To protect the content of the ML analytics, the client(s) 510 can include a ML analytics module(s) 512 that include at least one ML analytic model. These models can include but are not limited to neural networks models, decision tree models, or regression analysis models. These ML analytics models can be represented as machine executable code or using other representations including higher level languages.
The ML analytics contain at least one ML analytic data structure. These include data structures such as vectors of weights for a neural network analytic or a data structure representing a tree of features and splits for a decision tree analytic. The weight vector Wn represents the trained weights for the neural network. More details regarding the neural network is provided below. For the ML decision tree, the associated data structure is the pre-specified tree of features and splits.
The trained weights Wn of the neural network or data structure for the decision tree vector is passed to the HED (Homomorphic Encryption/Decryption) module 514. This module encrypts the ML analytic data structure using a homomorphic encryption scheme. In one embodiment, a fully homomorphic encryption scheme is used including but not limited to BFV (Brakerski/Fan-Vercauteren) and CKKS (Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song). Details of the homomorphic encryption of a trained neural network and decision tree data structures are described in more detail below.
The HED module 514 receives at least one data structure from the ML analytics module 512. The HED module 514 can also receive the ML analytic for transmission to the server(s) 520 or alternatively the servers(s) 520 can be preloaded with the ML analytic but lacking the trained data structures. The HED module 514 homomorphically encrypts the ML analytic data structure 516 which is transmitted to the server(s) 520.
The HED model 514 is configured to receive the homomorphically encrypted result 524, decrypt the result 524 using the homomorphic scheme, and output a result 518.
To protect previously mentioned aspects of a ML analytic, the server(s) 520 can be configured to perform the ML analytics using the ML homomorphically encrypted data structures in a homomorphic scheme on the instances 530 and thereby, obtain encrypted result of the encrypted ML analytics 522. The encrypted result 524 can be sent to the client(s) 510. The HED 514 can decrypt the ML encrypted result generating an unencrypted result 518.
Homomorphically Encrypted Neural Network Analytics
To make a result based on an instance, real values extracted from the instance are fed into the neural network as inputs 610 along designated input connections to the first layer of artificial neurons. These inputs 610 are multiplied with the connection weights 620 and fed into the activation functions 630 of the artificial neuron(s) 600, producing the output signals for that layer. The next layer (not shown) of artificial neurons uses these output signals as its input signals, and data is fed through the network this way until it moves through all of the layers and reaches designated output signals. Finally, these output 640 signals are interpreted as a prediction, classification or other result.
Encrypted Decision Tree
To evaluate an instance to generate a result, the algorithm starts at the tree's root node and computes the answer to its question; it follows the right branch if the answer is “yes” and the left branch if the answer is “no.” The algorithm continues this way until it reaches a leaf node, and returns the result 840 assigned to it.
For the leaf that would have been reached in the normal decision tree evaluation process for this instance, all of the multiplied values will be encryptions of 1 and the result of this multiplication will therefore be equal to an encryption of the leaf identifier; for any other leaf, at least one of the multiplied value will be an encryption of 0 so the result will be an encryption of 0. Finally, the computed values for all leaves are added up, yielding an encryption of the leaf identifier that is reached for this instance, which is the encrypted result 950. When this encrypted leaf identifier is passed back and decrypted by the model owner, the identifier is replaced by the true result value for the corresponding leaf node.
This technique encrypts the features used in the questions at each node in the tree but does not hide the structure of the tree. An extended embodiment of this invention masks the structure of the tree as follows. Assume some maximum tree depth D, such that no decision tree will have a depth (i.e. maximum number of nodes on any path from the root to a leaf) that exceeds D. Given a tree to encrypt, for any leaf nodes that are not yet at depth D, replace them by a decision node whose question is the same as the leaf's parent and whose children are both leaf nodes with the value of the original leaf. Repeat this process as necessary until all leaf nodes are at depth D and the tree is a full and complete tree. Then encrypt the resulting tree as described above.
Many types of instances contain numerical features which cannot be converted into binary features as described above. An extended embodiment of this invention handles such features using a homomorphic encryption scheme that supports evaluating binary circuits against encrypted values, such as GSW [3]. For each node in the decision tree that asks a question involving a numerical feature, the invention constructs an encrypted circuit that takes the instance data as input and produces an encrypted 1 (in a format compatible with the other encryption scheme) if the answer to the question is “yes” and an encrypted 0 if the answer is “no.” For the rest of the processing of the instance, the invention treats this value as an additional feature as described above; the node that asked this question corresponding to the circuit will have this new feature's slot marked as a 1 in its encrypted feature vector.
The method 1000 may commence in block 1005 with receiving, by at least one server, from a client, at least one learning machine analytic data structure. The at least one machine learning model data structure can be encrypted using the homomorphic encryption scheme. The homomorphic encryption scheme can include but not limited to BFV and CKKS schemes.
In block 1010, the method 1000 may proceed with extracting, by the at least one server, an instance.
In block 1015, the method 1000 may evaluate, by the at least one server, the at least one machine learning model data structure utilizing a trained machine learning model to obtain at least one encrypted result.
In block 1020, the method may proceed with sending, by the at least one server, the at least one encrypted result to the client. The client can be configured to decrypt the at least one encrypted result using the homomorphic encryption scheme.
The present technology is described above with reference to example embodiments. Therefore, other variations upon the example embodiments are intended to be covered by the present disclosure.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 15/876,024, filed on Jan. 19, 2018, which claims the benefit and priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,890, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,918, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,893, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,906, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,908, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,913, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,916, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,883, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application 62/448,885, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,902, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,896, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/448,899, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/462,818, filed on Feb. 23, 2017; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein, including all references and appendices, for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5732390 | Katayanagi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6178435 | Schmookler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6745220 | Hars | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748412 | Ruehle | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6910059 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7712143 | Comlekoglu | May 2010 | B2 |
7937270 | Smaragdis et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8515058 | Gentry | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8565435 | Gentry et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8781967 | Tehranchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8832465 | Gulati et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9059855 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094378 | Yung et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9189411 | Mckeen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9215219 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9288039 | Monet et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9491111 | Roth et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9503432 | El Emam et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514317 | Martin et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9565020 | Camenisch et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9577829 | Roth et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9652609 | Kang et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9846787 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9852306 | Cash et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9942032 | Kornaropoulos et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9946810 | Trepetin et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9973334 | Hibshoosh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10027486 | Liu | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10055602 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10073981 | Arasu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10075288 | Khedr et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10120893 | Rocamora | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10129028 | Kamakari et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10148438 | Evancich et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181049 | El Defrawy et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10210266 | Antonopoulos et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10235539 | Ito et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10255454 | Kamara et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10333715 | Chu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10375042 | Chaum | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396984 | French et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10423806 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10489604 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10496631 | Tschudin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10644876 | Williams et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10693627 | Carr | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10721057 | Carr | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10728018 | Williams et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10771237 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790960 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10817262 | Carr et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10873568 | Williams | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10880275 | Williams | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10902133 | Williams et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10903976 | Williams et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10972251 | Carr | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20020032712 | Miyasaka et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073316 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104002 | Nishizawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030037087 | Rarick | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059041 | MacKenzie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110388 | Pavlin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040167952 | Gueron et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050008152 | MacKenzie | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050076024 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050259817 | Ramzan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008080 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008081 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070053507 | Smaragdis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095909 | Chaum | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140479 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143280 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090037504 | Hussain | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083546 | Staddon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090193033 | Ramzan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268908 | Bikel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279694 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287837 | Felsher | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100202606 | Almeida | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205430 | Chiou et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241595 | Felsher | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110026781 | Osadchy et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110107105 | Hada | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110525 | Gentry | May 2011 | A1 |
20110243320 | Halevi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283099 | Nath et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120039469 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054485 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066510 | Weinman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120201378 | Nabeel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265794 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265797 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130010950 | Kerschbaum | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051551 | El Aimani | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054665 | Felch | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130114811 | Boufounos et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148868 | Troncoso Pastoriza et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170640 | Gentry | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191650 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195267 | Alessio et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198526 | Goto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216044 | Gentry et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230168 | Takenouchi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237242 | Oka et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246813 | Mori et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130326224 | Yavuz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339722 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339751 | Sun et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346741 | Kim et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346755 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140164758 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189811 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233727 | Rohloff et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140281511 | Kaushik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140355756 | Iwamura et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150100785 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100794 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150205967 | Naedele et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215123 | Kipnis et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227930 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229480 | Joye et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244517 | Nita | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248458 | Sakamoto | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304736 | Lal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150358152 | Ikarashi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358153 | Gentry | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160004874 | Ioannidis et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036826 | Pogorelik et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072623 | Joye et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105402 | Soon-Shiong et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105414 | Bringer et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119346 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160140348 | Nawaz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179945 | Lastra Diaz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182222 | Rane | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160323098 | Bathen | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335450 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344557 | Chabanne et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350648 | Gilad-Bachrach | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170070340 | Hibshoosh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070351 | Yan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099133 | Gu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134158 | Pasol et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170185776 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170264426 | Joye et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170366562 | Zhang | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180091466 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180139054 | Chu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180198601 | Laine et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204284 | Cerezo Sanchez | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212751 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212752 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212753 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212754 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212755 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212756 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212757 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212758 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212759 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212775 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212933 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180224882 | Carr | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180234254 | Camenisch et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180267981 | Sirdey et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180270046 | Carr | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276417 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180343109 | Koseki et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349632 | Bent et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359097 | Lindell | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373882 | Veugen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190013950 | Becker et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042786 | Williams et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190108350 | Bohli et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190158272 | Chopra et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190229887 | Ding et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190238311 | Zheng | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251553 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251554 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253235 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190260585 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266282 | Mitchell | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190280880 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190312728 | Poeppelmann | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190327078 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190334716 | Kocsis et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349191 | Soriente et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371106 | Kaye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200134200 | Williams et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150930 | Carr et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200382274 | Williams et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200396053 | Williams et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210034765 | Williams et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210105256 | Williams | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2873186 | Mar 2018 | EP |
5680007 | Mar 2015 | JP |
101386294 | Apr 2014 | KR |
WO2014105160 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO2015094261 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO2016003833 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO2016018502 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO2018091084 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018136801 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136804 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136811 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vercauteren (Junfeng Van Vercauteren, “Somewhat Practical Fully Homomorphic Encryption”, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. 2012), (Year: 2012). |
Microsoft Press, “Microsoft Computer Dictionary”, 5th Edition, author unknown, ISBN 0735614954, 2002, (Year: 2002). |
Wikipedia, “Homomorphic encryption”, author unknown, found/retrieved on May 22, 2021. (Year: 2021). |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014535, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 9 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014530, dated Apr. 23, 2018, 7 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014551, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 8 pages. |
Petition to Insitute Derivation Proceeding Pursuant to 35 USC 135; Case No. DER2019-00009, US Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Jul. 26, 2019, 272 pages. (2 PDFs). |
SCAMP Working Paper L29/11, “A Woods Hole Proposal Using Striping,” Dec. 2011, 14 pages. |
O'Hara, Michael James, “Shovel-ready Private Information Retrieval,” Dec. 2015, 4 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “Proposed Laughing Owl,” NSA Technical Report, Jan. 5, 2016, 18 pages. |
Williams, Ellison Anne et al., “Wideskies: Scalable Private Information Retrieval,” Jun. 8, 2016, 14 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “A Private Stream Search Technique,” NSA Technical Report, Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Paillier-encrypted databases with fast aggregated queries,” 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Jan. 8-11, 2017, pp. 848-853. |
Tu et al., “Processing Analytical Queries over Encrypted Data,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 6, Issue No. 5, Mar. 13, 2013. pp. 289-300. |
Boneh et al., “Private Database Queries Using Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption”, Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2013/422, Standford University [online], Jun. 27, 2013, [retrieved on Dec. 9, 2019], 22 pages. |
Chen et al., “Efficient Multi-Key Homomorphic Encryption with Packed Ciphertexts with Application to Oblivious Neural Network Inference”, CCS '19 Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computerand Communications Security, May 19, 2019. pp. 395-412. |
Armknecht et al., “A Guide to Fully Homomorphic Encryption” IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2015/1192 [online], Dec. 14, 2015, 35 pages. |
Bayar et al., “A Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer”, IH&MMSec 2016, Jun. 20-22, 2016. pp. 5-10. |
Juvekar et al. “GAZELLE: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference”, 27th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 15-17, 2018. pp. 1650-1668. |
Bösch et al.,“SOFIR: Securely Outsourced Forensic Recognition,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE 978-1-4799-2893-4/14, 2014, pp. 2713-2717. |
Waziri et al., “Big Data Analytics and Data Security in the Cloud via Fullly Homomorphic Encryption,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, pp. 744-753. |
Bajpai et al., “A Fully Homomorphic Encryption Implementation on Cloud Computing,” International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, ISSN 0974-2239 vol. 4, No. 8, 2014, pp. 811-816. |
Viejo et al., “Asymmetric homomorphisms for secure aggregation in heterogeneous scenarios,” Information Fusion 13, Elsevier B.V., Mar. 21, 2011, pp. 285-295. |
Patil et al., “Big Data Privacy Using Fully Homomorphic Non-Deterministic Encryption,” IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference, Jan. 5-7, 2017, 15 pages. |
Panda et al., “FPGA Prototype of Low Latency BBS PRNG,” IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems, Dec. 2015, pp. 118-123, 7 pages. |
Sahu et al., “Implementation of Modular Multiplication for RSA Algorithm,” 2011 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, 2011, pp. 112-114, 3 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Achieving trustworthy Homomorphic Encryption by combining it with a Trusted Execution Environment,” Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Application (JoWUA), Mar. 2018, pp. 86-99. |
Google Scholar, search results for “trusted execution environment database”, 2 pages, Aug. 1, 2020. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QuerierDriver, https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/querier/wideskies/QuerierDriver.java; Jul. 11, 2016; 5 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QuerierDriverCLI, https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/querier/wideskies/QuerierCLI.java; Jul. 11, 2016; 9 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—Query; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/query/wideskies/Query.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 7 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QueryInfo; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/query/wideskies/QueryInfo.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 4 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—ComputeResponse; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/spark/ComputeResponse.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 8 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—HashSelectorsAndPartitionData; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/spark/HashSelectorsAndPartitionData.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 2 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—HashSelectorsAndFormPartitionsBigInteger; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/common/HashSelectorAndPartitionData.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 3 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QueryUtils; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/query/wideskies/QueryUtils.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 8 pages. |
PIRK Code Excerpt—QuerySchema; [online]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-retired-pirk/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/schema/query/QuerySchema.java>; Jul. 11, 2016; 3 pages. |
“PIRK Proposal” Apache.org [online], [retreived on Oct. 28, 2020]; Retreived from the Internet: <URL:https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/incubator/PirkProposal>; Apr. 10, 2019; 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200204341 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62462818 | Feb 2017 | US | |
62448883 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448885 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448890 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448893 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448896 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448899 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448902 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448906 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448908 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448913 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448916 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448918 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15876024 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16803718 | US |