1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates generally to information handling systems, and more particularly to systems and methods for secure neighbor discovery (SEND).
2. Description of the Related Art
As the value and use of information continues to increase, individuals and businesses seek additional ways to process and store information. One option available to users is information handling systems. An information handling system generally processes, compiles, stores, and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or other purposes thereby allowing users to take advantage of the value of the information. Because technology and information handling needs and requirements vary between different users or applications, information handling systems may also vary regarding what information is handled, how the information is handled, how much information is processed, stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the information may be processed, stored, or communicated. The variations in information handling systems allow for information handling systems to be general or configured for a specific user or specific use such as financial transaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage, or global communications. In addition, information handling systems may include a variety of hardware and software components that may be configured to process, store, and communicate information and may include one or more computer systems, data storage systems, and networking systems.
Secure neighbor discovery (SEND) protocol is a security extension of neighbor discovery protocol (NDP) in IPv6 defined in RFC 2971. NDP allows for discovery of other network nodes on a local link. The protocol is insecure and susceptible to malicious interference. SEND provides an alternate mechanism for securing NDP with a cryptographic method that is independent of IPsec, the original and inherent method of securing IPv6 communications.
Current SEND protocols utilize cryptographically generated address (CGA) and authorization delegation discovery (ADD) to provide security. CGA uses an RSA key to generate a host address and signature and transmit a public key in the CGA option portion of a message. The CGA option is not available to hosts with existing addresses. THE ADD mechanism requires a trust anchor to authenticate the certificates of routers.
The present technology provides an extension to the SEND protocol without requiring a CGA or third party trust anchor. A shared key is provided to both a sender and receiver of a neighbor discovery (ND) message. A digital signature option is contained in the ND message. A digital signature field is determined by the algorithm field in the option. When the ND message is received, the receiver may verify the digital signature field using the pre-shared key according to the algorithm field. If the ND message passes verification, the receiver may process the message.
In an embodiment, a method for verifying an ND message may begin with receiving a neighbor discovery message from a first computer by a second computer. The neighbor discovery message may include an algorithm identifier and algorithm. The algorithm identifier and algorithm may be accessed from the neighbor discovery message. A verification of the received neighbor discovery message may be performed by the second computer based on the algorithm identifier, algorithm, and a key.
In an embodiment, an information handling system may include a processor, memory and one or more modules. The one or more modules may be stored in memory and executable by the processor to receive a neighbor discovery message from a first computer by a second computer, the neighbor discovery message including an algorithm identifier and algorithm, access the algorithm identifier and algorithm from the neighbor discovery message, and perform a verification of the received neighbor discovery message by the second computer based on the algorithm identifier, algorithm, and a key.
In the following description, specific details are set forth describing some embodiments consistent with the present disclosure. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that some embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. The specific embodiments disclosed herein are meant to be illustrative but not limiting. One skilled in the art may realize other elements that, although not specifically described here, are within the scope and the spirit of this disclosure. In addition, to avoid unnecessary repetition, one or more features shown and described in association with one embodiment may be incorporated into other embodiments unless specifically described otherwise or if the one or more features would make an embodiment non-functional.
For purposes of this disclosure, an information handling system may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, calculate, determine, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, communicate, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, an information handling system may be a personal computer (e.g., desktop or laptop), tablet computer, mobile device (e.g., personal digital assistant (PDA) or smart phone), server (e.g., blade server or rack server), a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. The information handling system may include random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of the information handling system may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, touchscreen and/or a video display. The information handling system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
The present technology provides an extension to the SEND protocol without requiring a CGA or third party trust anchor. A shared key is provided to both a first computer (e..g., a sender) and a second computer (e.g., a receiver) of a neighbor discovery (ND) message. A digital signature option is contained in the ND message sent by a first computer. A digital signature field is determined by the algorithm field in the digital signature option. When the ND message is received, the receiver may verify the digital signature field using the pre-shared key according to the algorithm field. If the ND message passes verification, the receiver may process the message.
Algorithm table 122 may provide values for an algorithm filed and corresponding digital signal field. The algorithm field value and digital signal field value may be placed into a neighbor discover (ND) message by computer 120 and accessed from the message by receiving computer 130, 140 or 150. An example of an algorithm table is discussed with respect to
Computers 130-150 may receive an ND message transmitted by computer 120. The ND message may include an algorithm field and a digital signature field. The values for the algorithm field and a digital signature field should correspond to values in an algorithm table 132, 142, and 152 stored at computers 130-150, respectively. Each of computers 130-150 may receive an ND message from computer 120, perform a verification of the message based on the algorithm field value, a digital signature field value, and shared key, and determine whether the message is verified. If the message is verified, the message may be processed by the receiving computer. If the message is not verified, the message may be discarded. One or more modules stored on each of computers 130-150 and executed by a processor may access the algorithm field value and digital signature field, perform verification of the message, and perform other functionality as discussed herein.
A neighbor discovery message is generated with a digital signature option at step 320. The digital signature option may be enabled by setting an algorithm field to a value that corresponds to a particular digital signature algorithm. The algorithm for the digital signature field is selected based on the algorithm field at step 330. Referring for example to the table of
The ND message is received at step 350. The message may be received by the first computer. At step 360, a verification is performed on the received ND message. The verification may be performed based on the shared key and the algorithm. More detail for performing verification is provided with respect to
In some instances, a receiving computer may be configured to verify certain types of ND messages, for example only all ND messages, only SEND-enabled messages, only digital signature option messages, or other messages. For example, a computer could be configured to verify only Router Advertisement (RA) messages and not to verify the other ND messages. Or, a computer could be configured to verify all types of ND messages, including Router Solicitation, Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, Neighbor Advertisements and Redirect message.
The components shown in
Storage device 530, which may include mass storage implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, may be a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit 510. Storage device 530 can store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present invention for purposes of loading that software into main memory 510.
Portable storage device of storage 540 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk or Digital video disc, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 500 of
The system 500 as shown in
Display system 570 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD), LED display, or other suitable display device. Display system 570 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripherals 580 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system. For example, peripheral device(s) 580 may include a modem or a router.
The components contained in the computer system 500 of
The foregoing detailed description of the technology herein has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the technology to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The described embodiments were chosen in order to best explain the principles of the technology and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the technology in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the technology be defined by the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/397,573 filed Jan. 3, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,800,417 which is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/587,947 filed Dec. 31, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,537,872 issued on Jan. 3, 2017, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6981141 | Mahne | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7023997 | Schier | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 8307422 | Varadhan | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8316435 | Varadhan | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8369334 | Yu | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8713627 | Varadhan et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8724633 | Yu | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8730844 | Johnson | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8782408 | Fielder | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8856869 | Brinskelle | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8934625 | Fielder | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9020149 | Golwalkar | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9107048 | Haddad | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9237129 | Ling | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9503425 | Ling | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9537872 | Liu | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9800417 | Liu | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 20040034771 | Edgett | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196979 | Cheng | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240669 | Kempf | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20060077908 | Park | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190612 | Kahol et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070011734 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211892 | Ohkoshi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245401 | Brabson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080120236 | Faith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181403 | Sakamoto | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263353 | Droms et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320582 | Chen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025077 | Trojanowski | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119407 | Krishnan | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204691 | Xia et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100172257 | Yu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100175123 | Karino et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202345 | Jing | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299529 | Fielder | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318784 | Rao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110055572 | Vogt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161661 | Medvinsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255445 | Johnson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120005480 | Batke et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20130163426 | Beliveau et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130276092 | Sun et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130343295 | Deo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140013324 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082204 | Shankar et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140115120 | Li et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20150334090 | Ling | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160094518 | Ling | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160119287 | Khazan et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160127317 | Ardeli et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160191543 | Liu | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160219018 | Raman | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170118027 | Liu | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170142070 | Ling | May 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 2015175007 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Dierks et al.; “The TLS Protocol Version 1.0”, Jan. 1999, pp. 31-35, obtained from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt. |
| PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/045312 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 7, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,928 Office Action dated May 19, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/606,451 Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/606,451 Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/587,947 Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/587,947 Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/397,573 Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170353317 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15397573 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Child | 15684828 | US | |
| Parent | 14587947 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Child | 15397573 | US |