None.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Electronic devices, such as personal computers, may engage in Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) communications. VoIP is a methodology for delivering voice communications and multimedia over Internet Protocol (IP) networks rather than over the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). VoIP communications in which electronic devices engage include videoconferencing which may allow participants to view multimedia images of communicating parties. VoIP videoconferencing can occur over peer-to-peer network architectures in which the communicating electronic devices act as peer nodes in a system that lacks central infrastructure. By acting as peer nodes, the communicating electronic devices each share a client-server role in the peer-to-peer communication.
In an embodiment, a method of extending a peer-to-peer platform to a mobile communication device is disclosed. The method comprises assigning an identifier to a Voice over Internet Protocol identity, sending a license key to a trusted register in the mobile communication device, and cross listing the identifier with the Voice over Internet Protocol identity, wherein a call placed to the Voice over Internet Protocol identity is routed to both an electronic device and the mobile communication device. The method further comprises routing a Voice Over Internet Protocol call addressed to the Voice over Internet Protocol identity to both the electronic device and the mobile communication device, wherein the call routing to the mobile communication device is based on the identifier and the cross listing.
In an embodiment, a method of establishing a peer-to-peer platform on a mobile communication device is disclosed. The method comprises receiving in a trusted security zone of the mobile communication device a license key and an identifier, wherein the identifier is coupled with a Voice over Internet Protocol service account, authenticating the mobile communication device to the Voice over Internet Protocol service based on at least one of the license key and the identifier, and receiving, on the mobile communication device, an incoming call via the Public Switched Telephone Network, wherein the incoming call originated in the Internet Protocol realm.
In an embodiment, a method of extending a peer-to-peer platform to a mobile communication device is disclosed. The method comprises sending a license key and an identifier from trusted data storage to a trusted security zone of a mobile communication device, wherein the identifier is hidden in the trusted security zone such that characteristics of the identifier are unknown to a user of the mobile communication device, unknown to a Public Switched Telephone Network service provider, and are unknown to a Voice over Internet Protocol service provider. The method further comprises linking the identifier to a Voice over Internet Protocol service account of an electronic device and routing a Voice over Internet Protocol call addressed to the account of the electronic device to the mobile communication device based on the identifier, wherein the call is converted from Internet Protocol to the Public Switched Telephone Network at a routing table.
These and other features will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
It should be understood at the outset that although illustrative implementations of one or more embodiments are illustrated below, the disclosed systems and methods may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not yet in existence. The disclosure should in no way be limited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services such as Skype, Google Talk, OoVoo, Vonage or other services may be used for voice and/or multimedia communications between electronic devices such as desktop computers, laptop computers, etc. Users choosing to communicate using Voice over Internet Protocol services may find videoconferencing via the Voice over Internet Protocol service preferable to communicating over a landline of the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) for a variety of reasons. For example, users may prefer to communicate using Voice over Internet Protocol services because they find the communication to be more personal than communication that occurs over a landline of the Public Switched Telephone Network.
Thus, in some cases, a calling party may be more likely to attempt an initial call via a Voice over Internet Protocol service than to attempt the call via the Public Switched Telephone Network. It is sometimes the case that the called party of a Voice over Internet Protocol call is unable to receive the call due to being away from the called electronic device, the called electronic device being out of service due to lack of service and/or malfunction, or due to some other reason. In such cases, the Voice over Internet Protocol call may not be completed, and the calling party may find it easier to invoke other communication methods in order to reach the called party.
The present disclosure teaches extending a peer-to-peer platform to a mobile communication device. In an embodiment, calls originating as Internet Protocol calls may be received on the mobile communication device via the Public Switched Telephone Network. The calls may be changed from the Internet Protocol realm to the Public Switched Telephone Network realm at a routing table within a network. Thus, a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) call may be initiated by a calling party and may be received on the mobile communication device of a called party via the Public Switched Telephone Network. In an embodiment, a peer-to-peer Voice over Internet Protocol call may be dually routed to a called party's electronic device and to the called party's mobile communication device, which may be a cell phone, a mobile phone, a smartphone, etc. In some cases, the Voice over Internet Protocol call may be initially addressed to the called party's electronic device and may be routed to both the electronic device and the mobile communication device based on a cross listing in a routing table.
Such dual routing may allow the called party to receive Voice over Internet Protocol calls directed to his/her electronic device that he/she may have missed due to reasons presented above or due to other reasons. For example, a called party may be able to receive a Voice over Internet Protocol call to his/her electronic device on his/her mobile communication device when he/she is unable to receive the call on his/her electronic device. In some cases, the called party may wish to handle the call on a mobile communication device rather than on an electronic device, and routing a Voice over Internet Protocol call to both the called party's mobile communication device and the called party's electronic device may allow the called party to choose which device he/she would prefer to answer the call on.
Security measures to prevent spoofing of user identities may be beneficial to mobile communication device users and/or service providers. The present disclosure teaches provisioning a mobile communication device, operating in the Public Switched Telephone Network, such that the mobile communication device may receive calls originating as Voice over Internet Protocol calls that are routed to the mobile communication device and/or to an electronic device. The present disclosure teaches performing the provisioning under an umbrella of trust provided by a trusted security zone as described in greater detail hereinbelow. Performing the provisioning under an umbrella of trust may prevent spoofing of network identities such as a Voice over Internet Protocol identity and may prevent sniffers or other nefarious programs from infiltrating communications.
In an embodiment, a license key and an identifier may be inserted into a trusted register of the mobile communication device by a trusted source. The license key and identifier may be stored in the trusted register so that each call may be verified in trust during setup to prevent spoofing. In some cases, an End User License Agreement may be agreed to before the license key and/or the identifier are inserted into the trusted register of the mobile communication device. In some cases, the identifier may be assigned to the mobile communication device but may not be stored on the mobile communication device. The license key may serve to authenticate the mobile communication device to a Voice over Internet Protocol service. The identifier may identify the mobile communication device to the Voice over Internet Protocol service such that the mobile communication device may be associated with the electronic device in a server of the communication system. The Voice over Internet Protocol service may cross-list the identifier assigned to the mobile communication device such that a Voice over Internet Protocol call placed to the identifier will also be routed to the mobile communication device by the network service provider.
It is anticipated that trusted provisioning of a mobile communication device to be operable within a peer-to-peer manipulated single number service configured to cross-list an identifier assigned to the mobile communication device with an identifier assigned to an electronic device may provide several advantages to both a calling party and a called party. The called party may benefit from greater call receipt flexibility by being able to choose which device on which he/she would prefer to receive the call. The dual ringing nature of the present disclosure may further benefit the called party by providing a greater opportunity to receive the call. Further, a network service provider may obtain a call detail record that may be used for billing.
In an embodiment, the network service provider may provide service to the mobile communication device, and a partnered Voice over Internet Protocol provider may provide Voice over Internet Protocol services that may be used by the electronic device. In an embodiment, the network service provider and the Voice over Internet Protocol provider may be the same. An enterprise may subscribe to both the network service provider and to the Voice over Internet Protocol provider and may make use of services provided by both providers. In an embodiment, when a Voice over Internet Protocol call routed to the mobile communication device is received via the Public Switched Telephone Network, the network service provider may maintain a call detail record for the call. The call detail record may be used for billing.
The calling party may likewise benefit from a greater opportunity of the called party to receive the call. Additionally, the calling party may find it convenient for the call to dual ring to both the called party's electronic device and the called party's mobile communication device because, in the event that the called party doesn't answer a call to his/her electronic device, the calling party may save time by avoiding a separate, second call to the called party's mobile communication device. It is anticipated that both parties and service providers may benefit from protections afforded by performing authentication operations in the trusted security zone.
A trusted security zone provides chipsets with a hardware root of trust, a secure execution environment for applications, and secure access to peripherals. A hardware root of trust means the chipset should only execute programs intended by the device manufacturer or vendor and resists software and physical attacks, and therefore remains trusted to provide the intended level of security. The chipset architecture is designed to promote a programmable environment that allows the confidentiality and integrity of assets to be protected from specific attacks. Trusted security zone capabilities are becoming features in both wireless and fixed hardware architecture designs. Providing the trusted security zone in the main mobile device chipset and protecting the hardware root of trust removes the need for separate secure hardware to authenticate the device or user. To ensure the integrity of the applications requiring trusted data, such as a mobile financial services application, the trusted security zone also provides the secure execution environment where only trusted applications can operate, safe from attacks. Security is further promoted by restricting access of non-trusted applications to peripherals, such as data inputs and data outputs, while a trusted application is running in the secure execution environment. In an embodiment, the trusted security zone may be conceptualized as hardware assisted security.
A complete trusted execution environment (TEE) may be implemented through the use of the trusted security zone hardware and software architecture. The trusted execution environment is an execution environment that is parallel to the execution environment of the main mobile device operating system. The trusted execution environment and/or the trusted security zone may provide a base layer of functionality and/or utilities for use of applications that may execute in the trusted security zone. For example, in an embodiment, trust tokens may be generated by the base layer of functionality and/or utilities of the trusted execution environment and/or trusted security zone for use in trusted end-to-end communication links to document a continuity of trust of the communications. For more details on establishing trusted end-to-end communication links relying on hardware assisted security, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/532,588, filed Jun. 25, 2012, entitled “End-to-end Trusted Communications Infrastructure,” by Leo Michael McRoberts, et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Through standardization of application programming interfaces (APIs), the trusted execution environment becomes a place to which scalable deployment of secure services can be targeted. A device which has a chipset that has a trusted execution environment on it may exist in a trusted services environment, where devices in the trusted services environment are trusted and protected against attacks. The trusted execution environment can be implemented on mobile phones and tablets as well as extending to other trusted devices such as personal computers, servers, sensors, medical devices, point-of-sale terminals, industrial automation, handheld terminals, automotive, etc.
The trusted security zone is implemented by partitioning all of the hardware and software resources of the mobile device into two partitions: a secure partition and a normal partition. Placing sensitive resources in the secure partition can protect against possible attacks on those resources. For example, resources such as trusted software applications may run in the secure partition and have access to hardware peripherals such as a touchscreen or a secure location in memory. Less secure peripherals such as wireless radios may be disabled completely while the secure partition is being accessed, while other peripherals may only be accessed from the secure partition. While the secure partition is being accessed through the trusted execution environment, the main mobile operating system in the normal partition is suspended, and applications in the normal partition are prevented from accessing the secure peripherals and data. This prevents corrupted applications or malware applications from breaking the trust of the device.
The trusted security zone is implemented by partitioning the hardware and software resources to exist in a secure subsystem which is not accessible to components outside the secure subsystem. The trusted security zone is built into the processor architecture at the time of manufacture through hardware logic present in the trusted security zone which enables a perimeter boundary between the secure partition and the normal partition. The trusted security zone may only be manipulated by those with the proper credential and, in an embodiment, may not be added to the chip after it is manufactured. Software architecture to support the secure partition may be provided through a dedicated secure kernel running trusted applications. Trusted applications are independent secure applications which can be accessed by normal applications through an application programming interface in the trusted execution environment on a chipset that utilizes the trusted security zone.
In an embodiment, the normal partition applications run on a first virtual processor, and the secure partition applications run on a second virtual processor. Both virtual processors may run on a single physical processor, executing in a time-sliced fashion, removing the need for a dedicated physical security processor. Time-sliced execution comprises switching contexts between the two virtual processors to share processor resources based on tightly controlled mechanisms such as secure software instructions or hardware exceptions. The context of the currently running virtual processor is saved, the context of the virtual processor being switched to is restored, and processing is restarted in the restored virtual processor. Time-sliced execution protects the trusted security zone by stopping the execution of the normal partition while the secure partition is executing.
The two virtual processors context switch via a processor mode called monitor mode when changing the currently running virtual processor. The mechanisms by which the processor can enter monitor mode from the normal partition are tightly controlled. The entry to monitor mode can be triggered by software executing a dedicated instruction, the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) instruction, or by a subset of the hardware exception mechanisms such as hardware interrupts, which can be configured to cause the processor to switch into monitor mode. The software that executes within monitor mode then saves the context of the running virtual processor and switches to the secure virtual processor.
The trusted security zone runs a separate operating system that is not accessible to the device users. For security purposes, the trusted security zone is not open to users for installing applications, which means users do not have access to install applications in the trusted security zone. This prevents corrupted applications or malware applications from executing powerful instructions reserved to the trusted security zone and thus preserves the trust of the device. The security of the system is achieved at least in part by partitioning the hardware and software resources of the mobile phone so they exist in one of two partitions, the secure partition for the security subsystem and the normal partition for everything else. Placing the trusted security zone in the secure partition and restricting access from the normal partition protects against software and basic hardware attacks. Hardware logic ensures that no secure partition resources can be accessed by the normal partition components or applications. A dedicated secure partition operating system runs in a virtual processor separate from the normal partition operating system that likewise executes in its own virtual processor. Users may install applications on the mobile device which may execute in the normal partition operating system described above. The trusted security zone runs a separate operating system for the secure partition that is installed by the mobile device manufacturer or vendor, and users are not able to install new applications in or alter the contents of the trusted security zone.
Turning now to
In an embodiment, the mobile communication device 102 comprises a trusted security zone 150 and a permissive sector 160. The trusted security zone 150 is depicted in
In an embodiment, a user of the electronic device 130 may have a Voice over Internet Protocol identity known by a Voice over Internet Protocol service such as Skype, Oovoo, Google Talk, Vonage, or some other service. The Internet Protocol (IP) address of the electronic device 130 may be linked to the user's Voice over Internet Protocol identity such that Voice over Internet Protocol calls addressed to the user's Voice over Internet Protocol identity may be routed to the Internet Protocol address of the electronic device 130. In some cases, a Voice over Internet Protocol service account may be linked to an Internet Protocol address of the electronic device 130 and may be considered substantially similar to a Voice over Internet Protocol identity. In some contexts, the Voice over Internet Protocol identity and/or the Voice over Internet Protocol service account of a user of the electronic device 130 may be considered to be the Voice over Internet Protocol identity and the Voice over Internet Protocol service account of the electronic device 130.
A user of the electronic device 130 may use the Voice over Internet Protocol service capabilities of the electronic device 130 to communicate over the network 116. It is sometimes the case that Voice over Internet Protocol services operate through a peer-to-peer architecture, wherein each device adopts a client/server relationship in the communication. Communicating over the network 116 may include calling and receiving calls over the network 116. A calling party wishing to contact the user of the electronic device 130 may invoke a Voice over Internet Protocol service in an attempt to reach the user of the electronic device 130. In such circumstances, a Voice over Internet Protocol call may be placed by the calling party to the called party, in this case the user of the electronic device 130, by addressing the call to the user's Voice over Internet Protocol identity which may then be routed to the electronic device 130.
In an embodiment, a service provider agreement may be made between a Voice over Internet Protocol service provider and a mobile service provider that provides service to the mobile communication device 102. The agreement may allow the mobile communication device 102 to be provisioned such that Voice over Internet Protocol calls to the electronic device 130 may be dually routed to both the electronic device 130 and to the mobile communication device 102. In some cases, the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 may be owned and/or operated by a single user, thus, dual routing Voice over Internet Protocol calls to both the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 may allow the user to receive the call on either device. In an embodiment, the provisioning process and Voice over Internet Protocol calls received through the single number service arising from the provisioning may occur in the realm of trust. In some embodiments, the call setup may occur in the realm of trust, but the call itself may operate outside of the trusted execution environment.
In an embodiment, the trusted Voice over Internet Protocol server 118 may execute a trusted voice provisioning process in order to supply the mobile communication device 102 with the license key 106 and an identifier 104 for use with the Voice over Internet Protocol service. As described above, in some cases, the identifier 104 may be assigned to the mobile communication device 102 without being stored on the mobile communication device 102. The identifier 104 may comprise a mobile ID, a Voice over Long Term Evolution (VoLTE) identifier in the case of a Long Term Evolution (LTE) network, a telephone number, or some other identifier for use with the Voice over Internet Protocol service. The identifier 104 may be separate from the phone number attributed to the mobile communication device 102 by the mobile service provider. The identifier 104 may be configured to associate the mobile communication device 102 with the Voice over Internet Protocol identity of the electronic device 130. In order to provide security against spoofing, the identifier 104 may remain hidden in the trusted security zone 150 such that the characteristics of the identifier 104 remain unknown to users, mobile service providers, Public Switched Telephone Network providers, and Voice over Internet Protocol service providers.
In an embodiment, the trusted Voice over Internet Protocol server 118 may identify an identifier 104 to attribute to the mobile communication device 102 and may query the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol Core/IMS 128 for session initiation protocol routing instructions and the address of the mobile communication device 102. The trusted Voice over Internet Protocol Server 118 may send the identifier 104 and the license key 106 to the mobile communication device 102. Alternatively, in some cases, only the license key 106 may be sent. In some cases, the license key 106 may be sent to the mobile communication device 102 and before the identifier 104 is sent to the mobile communication device 102. In an embodiment, the trusted Voice over Internet Protocol Server 118 may identify and send the identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 from the trusted data store 120.
Alternatively, the identifier 104 and the license key 106 may be identified and sent from different data stores. For example, the identifier 104 may be identified and sent from the trusted data store 120 and the license key 106 may be identified and sent from some other data store. In some cases, there may be a plurality of trusted data stores 120, and the identifier 104 and the license key 106 may be taken from different trusted data stores 120.
In order to maintain an environment of trust, the identifier 104 and/or license key 106 may be sent to the mobile communication device 102 via trusted end-to-end communication through one or more trusted nodes. Maintaining an environment of trust throughout the selection and transport of the identifier 104 and the license key 106 to the mobile communication device 102 may prevent the identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 from being discovered. The protection of the identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 may prevent nefarious programs from spoofing the identity of the mobile communication device 102 and/or the electronic device 130 and/or otherwise corrupting the information transfer.
Within the mobile communication device 102, the identifier 104 and the license key 106 may be stored in a trusted register, such as a trusted port or trusted portion of memory, on the mobile communication device 102. Alternatively, the identifier 104 and the license key 106 may be stored in another trusted location on the mobile communication device 102. In some cases, the identifier 104 may not be sent to the mobile communication device 102, and the license key 106 may be stored in the trusted security zone 150. The trusted Voice over Internet Protocol server 118 may mark the trusted data store 120 to indicate that the identifier 104 and the license key 106 attributed to the mobile communication device 102 have been distributed. Marking the trusted data store 120 may prevent duplicate identifier's 104 from being attributed to other devices. The license key 106 and the identifier 104 attributed to the mobile communication device 102 may serve to authenticate the mobile communication device 102 to the Voice over Internet Protocol service and may allow the mobile communication device 102 to participate in a single number service that may allow Voice over Internet Protocol calls to be routed to the mobile communication device 102 and to the electronic device 130.
In an embodiment, the identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 may be revocable. The identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 may be revoked in response to non-payment of service, departure from an enterprise, violation of the terms of an End User License Agreement, of for some other reason. In the case that the identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 are revoked from the mobile communication device 102, the mobile communication device 102 may lose its single number service capabilities that allows it to be dually rung along with the electronic device 130.
In an embodiment, one of the trusted applications 110 may invoke the identifier 104 and/or the license key 106 to authenticate the mobile communication device 102 to the Voice over Internet Protocol service. In response to the authentication, the Voice over Internet Protocol service may send a provisioning request to the network 116, wherein the provisioning request may be configured to alter a routing table such that the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 may be cross listed as Voice over Internet Protocol call destinations reachable through Voice over Internet Protocol calls addressed to a single number. Cross listing the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 may allow Voice over Internet Protocol calls to the electronic device 130 to dually ring both the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130. In some cases, Voice over Internet Protocol calls to a single number that is configured to ring through to both the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 may be considered Voice over Internet Protocol calls addressed to the electronic device 130.
In an embodiment, dually ringing the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 may comprise ringing both the devices in response to a single connection request. This may include ringing both devices at the same time, within about one half second of each other, within about one second of each other, within about two seconds of each other, within about three seconds of each other, within about four seconds of each other, within about five seconds of each other, or within some other time period of each other. Similarly, in some contexts, incoming call signals on both the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 received at the same time or within about one half second of each other, within about one second of each other, within about two seconds of each other, within about three seconds of each other, within about four seconds of each other, within about five seconds of each other, or within some other time period of each other may be considered to be dually received.
In an embodiment, the routing table may be altered to facilitate dual ringing between the mobile communication device 102 and the electronic device 130 by setting and/or modifying a Wireless Intelligent Network (WIN) trigger in a circuit switching network, by modifying a Home Subscriber Service (HSS) profile in a Long Term Evolution (LTE) network, or through some other mechanism. A user of the mobile communication device 102 may have the capability to toggle the single number service on and off according to his/her personal preference. In an embodiment, the user may invoke one of the Voice over Internet Protocol applications 108 to toggle the single number service on and off. Alternatively, the user may invoke something else such as a widget frame, a switch, a dialogue box, etc., to toggle the single number service on and off.
In an embodiment, a Voice over Internet Protocol call may be placed to a Voice over Internet Protocol identity linked to the Internet Protocol address of the electronic device 130 and may ring through to both the electronic device 130 and the mobile communication device 102. In response to answering the Voice over Internet Protocol call on one of the devices, the incoming call signal to the device on which the Voice over Internet Protocol call was not answered may be canceled and the Voice over Internet Protocol call may be established on the device which answered the call. An acknowledge receipt message may be sent in response to receiving the call, and the call may be routed to the receiving device based on the acknowledgement receipt message.
For example, when both devices are ringing to indicate an incoming Voice over Internet Protocol call dually routed to both devices, a user may answer the Voice over Internet Protocol call on the mobile communication device 102 and the incoming call signal to the electronic device 130 may be canceled and the Voice over Internet Protocol call established on the mobile communication device 102. In an embodiment, the Voice over Internet Protocol call may be converted from an Internet Protocol context to a context compatible with the mobile communication device 102. For example, the Voice over Internet Protocol call may be converted to an analog voice context. Alternatively, the mobile communication device 102 may be able to receive the Voice over Internet Protocol call in an Internet Protocol context.
In an embodiment, a user of the mobile communication device 102 may receive a call through the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) while communicating on a call that originated as a Voice over Internet Protocol call that was dually routed to the mobile communication device 102 and to the electronic device 130. In this case, the user may swap between calls by leaving trust to receive the PSTN call and returning to trust to continue the call that originated as a Voice over Internet Protocol call. In some cases, the call that originated as a Voice over Internet Protocol call may not occur in trust, and switching between calls may not involve entering and leaving trust. In an embodiment, calls that occur through different networks may be billed to different entities.
In an embodiment, a user of the mobile communication device 102 may be affiliated with an enterprise and may conduct business through the Voice over Internet Protocol service. For example, the user of the mobile communication device 102 may participate in video conferences through Voice over Internet Protocol communications on the electronic device 130. It may be the case that service provider agreements have arranged for certain services, such as Voice over Internet Protocol communications, to be billed to the enterprise and other communications, such as PSTN calls, to be billed to the user.
Thus, it may be the case that swapping from a call that originated as a Voice over Internet Protocol call to a Voice over Internet Protocol identity linked to the Internet Protocol address of the electronic device 130 that was dually routed to both the electronic device 130 and to the mobile communication device 102 to a PSTN call directly routed to the mobile communication device 102 may be associated with a change in billing entities. In some cases, the trusted security zone 150 may be configured to keep track of Voice over Internet Protocol communications. Alternatively, trusted sources across the network 116 may keep track of Voice over Internet Protocol communications. For example, a call detail record can be generated and reported back to the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128 or the trusted Voice over Internet Protocol server 118.
In an embodiment, the call detail record may be established after receiving a call initiation request that was converted from Voice over Internet Protocol to the Public Switched Telephone Network and routed to the mobile communication device 102. The call detail record may comprise information about the length of the call, information about the calling party, information about the called party, and/or other information. The call may have been routed to the mobile communication device 102 based on a cross listing of the mobile communication device 102 in a routing table. In some cases, the call detail record may be generated, created and/or established by a telephone exchange. In an embodiment, the call detail record may be used for billing purposes. The billing may be based on the amount of time an application on the mobile communication device 102 was running. The application may be a Skype application, an ooVoo application, a Vonage application, a Google Talk application, or some other application. The call detail record may be generated, created, and/or established upon completion of the call.
Turning now to
In an embodiment, the Trusted Voice End User License Agreement provisioning process 170 may direct the enterprise identity processor 165 to assign the license key 106 and/or the identifier 104 to the mobile communication device 102. The Trusted Voice numbering proxy 180 may be dipped to mark the number identity pool 182 to indicate that the identifier 104 has been assigned to the mobile communication device 102. The End User License Agreement pool 186 may be marked to indicate that the license key 106 has been assigned to the mobile communication device 102. The Trusted Voice network interface process 175 may be invoked to insert the license key 106 and/or the identifier 104 into the mobile communication device 102.
In an embodiment, the Trusted Voice network interface process 175 may direct the trusted Voice over Internet Protocol server 119 to query the Mobile Service Provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128 for session initiation protocol routing and the address of the mobile communication device 102. Trusted applications 110 on the mobile communication device 102 may be informed that the license key 106 and the identifier 104 are valid. The trusted applications 110 may be configured to authenticate the mobile communication device 102 to the Trusted Voice over Internet Protocol server 119 in response authentication requests.
In an embodiment, the subscriber alias data store 184 may comprise subscriber email addresses that may be linked to subscriber Internet Protocol addresses contained in the Internet Protocol address data store 188. In some cases, subscriber aliases may be Voice over Internet Protocol service identities. Information contained in the subscriber alias data store 184 and/or the Internet Protocol address data store 188 may be used in routing calls to the electronic device 130 and/or to other devices. In an embodiment, the number identity pool 182 may be used in routing calls to the mobile communication device 102 based on the identifier 104 marked as assigned to the mobile communication device 102 in the number identity pool 182. A routing table may be modified based on assigned identifiers in the number identity pool 182. In an embodiment, the routing table may be modified to cross list the identifier 104 with a subscriber alias or an Internet Protocol address of the electronic device 130.
Turning now to
The mobile communication device 102 exchanges Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) signaling 202 with a target network application server (AS) 290. It is understood that the Session Initiation Protocol signaling 202 may entail one or more messages sent both to and from each of the mobile communication device 102, a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 270, a Media Gateway Controller/Media Gateway (MGC/MG) 275, the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128, a mobile service provider Session Border Controller (SBC) 280, a target network Session Border Controller 285, and the target network application server 290.
During the Session Initiation Protocol signaling 202, the Media Gateway Controller/Media Gateway 275 sends a 200 OK message 204 to the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128 indicating that the initial requests associated with the Session Initiation Protocol signaling 202 have completed successfully. The mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128 relays a 200 OK message 206 to the mobile service provider Session Border Controller 280. The mobile service provider Session Border Controller 280 relays a 200 OK message 208 to the target network Session Border Controller 285. The target network Session Border Controller 285 relays a 200 OK message 210 to the target network application server 290.
In response to receiving the 200 OK message 210, the target network application server 290 sends an invite 212 to a trusted security zone area of hardware assisted trust (HWA trust) 250. The target network application server 290 may send an acknowledgement message (ACK) 214 to the target network Session Border Controller 285. The target network Session Border Controller 285 sends an acknowledgement message 216 to the mobile service provider Session Border Controller 280. The mobile service provider Session Border Controller 280 sends an acknowledgement message 218 to the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128. The mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128 sends an acknowledgement message 220 to the Media Gateway Controller/Media Gateway 275.
In response to receiving the invite 212, the trusted security zone area of hardware assisted trust 250 sends an End User License Agreement (EULA) invite 222 to the trusted security zone 150 of the mobile communication device 102. The trusted security zone 150 of the mobile communication device 102 sends an End User License Agreement (EULA) OK message 224 to the trusted security zone area of hardware assisted trust 250. In an embodiment, the trusted security zone 150 may establish a trusted execution environment on the mobile communication device 102 through which it may send the End User License Agreement OK message 224 which may authenticate the mobile communication device 102 to the trusted security zone area of hardware assisted trust 250. The End User License Agreement OK message 224 may comprise information about the license key 106 and may authenticate the mobile communication device 102 based on the license key 106. Both the trusted security zone 150 of the mobile communication device 102 and the trusted security zone area of hardware assisted trust 250 may comprise copies of the license key 106.
In response to receiving the End User License Agreement OK message 224, the trusted security zone area of hardware assisted trust 150 sends an acknowledgement message 226 to the target network application server 290. Media 228 may be exchanged between the target network application server 290 and the mobile communication device 102 in response to the target network application server 290 successfully receiving the acknowledgement message 226. It is understood that the media 228 may entail one or more messages sent both to and from each of the mobile communication device 102, the Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 270, the Media Gateway Controller/Media Gateway (MGC/MG) 275, the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128, the mobile service provider Session Border Controller (SBC) 280, the target network Session Border Controller 285, and the target network application server 290. In an embodiment, media 228 may comprise images, voice communications, and/or other things. In some embodiments, the media 228 may be exchanged under an umbrella of trust. In other embodiments, the media 228 may be exchanged outside of the realm of trust.
The Mobile Switching Center 270 sends a release message (REL) 230 to the Media Gateway Controller/Media Gateway 275. In an embodiment, the release message 230 may be sent in response to the conclusion of transfer of media 228. Session teardown messages 232 are sent between the mobile communication device 102 and the target network application server 290 in response to the release message 230. It is understood that session teardown messages 232 may entail one or more messages sent both to and from each of the mobile communication device 102, the Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 270, the Media Gateway Controller/Media Gateway (MGC/MG) 275, the mobile service provider Voice over Internet Protocol core/IMS 128, the mobile service provider Session Border Controller (SBC) 280, the target network Session Border Controller 285, and the target network application server 290.
Turning now to
At block 304, a license key may be sent to a trusted register in the mobile communication device. In some cases, the identifier may also be sent to the mobile communication device. In an embodiment, the trusted register may comprise a trusted port controlled by the trusted security zone of the mobile communication device. The identifier may be cross listed at block 306 such that a call placed to the Voice over Internet Protocol identity may be routed to both an electronic device and to the mobile communication device. In an embodiment, cross listing the mobile communication device and the electronic device may comprise altering a routing table. In a circuit switched network, the routing table may be altered by setting and/or modifying a Wireless Intelligent Network trigger. In a Long Term Evolution network, the routing table may be altered by modifying a Home Subscriber Service profile of a user of the mobile communication device and electronic device.
At block 310, a Voice over Internet Protocol call addressed to the Voice over Internet Protocol identity may be routed to both the electronic device and to the mobile communication device. In an embodiment, the call may be routed to both the electronic device and to the mobile communication device by configuring the calls to be forked at a gateway, such as a media gateway, based on the cross listing of the identifier. In an embodiment, the Voice over Internet Protocol identity may be a Skype identity, an ooVoo identity, a Vonage identity, a Google Talk identity, or some other Voice over Internet Protocol identity. In some cases, the Voice over Internet Protocol identity may be an identity associated with a user of an electronic device.
Turning now to
At block 704, the mobile communication device may be authenticated to the Voice over Internet Protocol service based on at least one of the license key and the identifier. The mobile communication device and the electronic device may be cross listed in a network routing table. An incoming call signal may be received on the mobile communication device at block 706. In an embodiment, the call may have originated in the Internet Protocol realm and may be received on the mobile communication device via the Public Switched Telephone Network. The incoming call may be routed to both the mobile communication device and the electronic device (e.g., forked) using the network routing table based on a single connection request. In an embodiment, the mobile communication device may be configured to ring, vibrate, light up, play audio, make other sounds, and/or otherwise indicate receiving the incoming call signal. The electronic device may also be configured to ring, vibrate, light up, play audio, make other sounds, and/or otherwise indicate receiving an incoming call. Thus, calls routed to both the electronic device and the mobile communication device may elicit both devices to indicate an incoming call.
Turning now to
At block 806, a Voice over Internet Protocol call addressed to the account of an electronic device may be routed to the mobile communication device based on the identifier. In an embodiment, the call may be converted from Internet Protocol to the Public Switched Telephone Network, wherein the conversion may occur at a routing table. In an embodiment the call may be routed to both the electronic device and the mobile communication device such that the mobile communication device and the electronic device dually receive an incoming call signal. In an embodiment, dually receiving an incoming call signal may comprise both the electronic device and the mobile communication device receiving the incoming call signal at the same time, within about one half second of each other, within about one second of each other, within about two seconds of each other, within about three seconds of each other, within about four seconds of each other, within about five seconds of each other, or within some other time period of each other. Additionally, the mobile communication device and the electronic device may be configured to ring or otherwise indicate receipt of the incoming call signal as discussed hereinabove.
The DSP 502 or some other form of controller or central processing unit operates to control the various components of the mobile device 400 in accordance with embedded software or firmware stored in memory 504 or stored in memory contained within the DSP 502 itself. In addition to the embedded software or firmware, the DSP 502 may execute other applications stored in the memory 504 or made available via information carrier media such as portable data storage media like the removable memory card 520 or via wired or wireless network communications. The application software may comprise a compiled set of machine-readable instructions that configure the DSP 502 to provide the desired functionality, or the application software may be high-level software instructions to be processed by an interpreter or compiler to indirectly configure the DSP 502.
The DSP 502 may communicate with a wireless network via the analog baseband processing unit 510. In some embodiments, the communication may provide Internet connectivity, enabling a user to gain access to content on the Internet and to send and receive e-mail or text messages. The input/output interface 518 interconnects the DSP 502 and various memories and interfaces. The memory 504 and the removable memory card 520 may provide software and data to configure the operation of the DSP 502. Among the interfaces may be the USB port 522 and the infrared port 524. The USB port 522 may enable the mobile device 400 to function as a peripheral device to exchange information with a personal computer or other computer system. The infrared port 524 and other optional ports such as a Bluetooth® interface or an IEEE 802.11 compliant wireless interface may enable the mobile device 400 to communicate wirelessly with other nearby handsets and/or wireless base stations.
The keypad 528 couples to the DSP 502 via the input/output interface 518 to provide one mechanism for the user to make selections, enter information, and otherwise provide input to the mobile device 400. Another input mechanism may be the touch screen LCD 530, which may also display text and/or graphics to the user. The touch screen LCD controller 532 couples the DSP 502 to the touch screen LCD 530. The GPS receiver 538 is coupled to the DSP 502 to decode global positioning system signals, thereby enabling the mobile device 400 to determine its position.
It is understood that by programming and/or loading executable instructions onto the computer system 380, at least one of the CPU 382, the RAM 388, and the ROM 386 are changed, transforming the computer system 380 in part into a particular machine or apparatus having the novel functionality taught by the present disclosure. It is fundamental to the electrical engineering and software engineering arts that functionality that can be implemented by loading executable software into a computer can be converted to a hardware implementation by well known design rules. Decisions between implementing a concept in software versus hardware typically hinge on considerations of stability of the design and numbers of units to be produced rather than any issues involved in translating from the software domain to the hardware domain. Generally, a design that is still subject to frequent change may be preferred to be implemented in software, because re-spinning a hardware implementation is more expensive than re-spinning a software design. Generally, a design that is stable that will be produced in large volume may be preferred to be implemented in hardware, for example in an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), because for large production runs the hardware implementation may be less expensive than the software implementation. Often a design may be developed and tested in a software form and later transformed, by well known design rules, to an equivalent hardware implementation in an application specific integrated circuit that hardwires the instructions of the software. In the same manner as a machine controlled by a new ASIC is a particular machine or apparatus, likewise a computer that has been programmed and/or loaded with executable instructions may be viewed as a particular machine or apparatus.
The secondary storage 384 is typically comprised of one or more disk drives or tape drives and is used for non-volatile storage of data and as an over-flow data storage device if RAM 388 is not large enough to hold all working data. Secondary storage 384 may be used to store programs which are loaded into RAM 388 when such programs are selected for execution. The ROM 386 is used to store instructions and perhaps data which are read during program execution. ROM 386 is a non-volatile memory device which typically has a small memory capacity relative to the larger memory capacity of secondary storage 384. The RAM 388 is used to store volatile data and perhaps to store instructions. Access to both ROM 386 and RAM 388 is typically faster than to secondary storage 384. The secondary storage 384, the RAM 388, and/or the ROM 386 may be referred to in some contexts as computer readable storage media and/or non-transitory computer readable media.
I/O devices 390 may include printers, video monitors, liquid crystal displays (LCDs), touch screen displays, keyboards, keypads, switches, dials, mice, track balls, voice recognizers, card readers, paper tape readers, or other well-known input devices.
The network connectivity devices 392 may take the form of modems, modem banks, Ethernet cards, universal serial bus (USB) interface cards, serial interfaces, token ring cards, fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) cards, wireless local area network (WLAN) cards, radio transceiver cards such as code division multiple access (CDMA), global system for mobile communications (GSM), long-term evolution (LTE), worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX), and/or other air interface protocol radio transceiver cards, and other well-known network devices. These network connectivity devices 392 may enable the processor 382 to communicate with the Internet or one or more intranets. With such a network connection, it is contemplated that the processor 382 might receive information from the network, or might output information to the network in the course of performing the above-described method steps. Such information, which is often represented as a sequence of instructions to be executed using processor 382, may be received from and outputted to the network, for example, in the form of a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave.
Such information, which may include data or instructions to be executed using processor 382 for example, may be received from and outputted to the network, for example, in the form of a computer data baseband signal or signal embodied in a carrier wave. The baseband signal or signal embedded in the carrier wave, or other types of signals currently used or hereafter developed, may be generated according to several methods well known to one skilled in the art. The baseband signal and/or signal embedded in the carrier wave may be referred to in some contexts as a transitory signal.
The processor 382 executes instructions, codes, computer programs, scripts which it accesses from hard disk, floppy disk, optical disk (these various disk based systems may all be considered secondary storage 384), ROM 386, RAM 388, or the network connectivity devices 392. While only one processor 382 is shown, multiple processors may be present. Thus, while instructions may be discussed as executed by a processor, the instructions may be executed simultaneously, serially, or otherwise executed by one or multiple processors. Instructions, codes, computer programs, scripts, and/or data that may be accessed from the secondary storage 384, for example, hard drives, floppy disks, optical disks, and/or other device, the ROM 386, and/or the RAM 388 may be referred to in some contexts as non-transitory instructions and/or non-transitory information.
In an embodiment, the computer system 380 may comprise two or more computers in communication with each other that collaborate to perform a task. For example, but not by way of limitation, an application may be partitioned in such a way as to permit concurrent and/or parallel processing of the instructions of the application. Alternatively, the data processed by the application may be partitioned in such a way as to permit concurrent and/or parallel processing of different portions of a data set by the two or more computers. In an embodiment, virtualization software may be employed by the computer system 380 to provide the functionality of a number of servers that is not directly bound to the number of computers in the computer system 380. For example, virtualization software may provide twenty virtual servers on four physical computers. In an embodiment, the functionality disclosed above may be provided by executing the application and/or applications in a cloud computing environment. Cloud computing may comprise providing computing services via a network connection using dynamically scalable computing resources. Cloud computing may be supported, at least in part, by virtualization software. A cloud computing environment may be established by an enterprise and/or may be hired on an as-needed basis from a third party provider. Some cloud computing environments may comprise cloud computing resources owned and operated by the enterprise as well as cloud computing resources hired and/or leased from a third party provider.
In an embodiment, some or all of the functionality disclosed above may be provided as a computer program product. The computer program product may comprise one or more computer readable storage medium having computer usable program code embodied therein to implement the functionality disclosed above. The computer program product may comprise data structures, executable instructions, and other computer usable program code. The computer program product may be embodied in removable computer storage media and/or non-removable computer storage media. The removable computer readable storage medium may comprise, without limitation, a paper tape, a magnetic tape, magnetic disk, an optical disk, a solid state memory chip, for example analog magnetic tape, compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM) disks, floppy disks, jump drives, digital cards, multimedia cards, and others. The computer program product may be suitable for loading, by the computer system 380, at least portions of the contents of the computer program product to the secondary storage 384, to the ROM 386, to the RAM 388, and/or to other non-volatile memory and volatile memory of the computer system 380. The processor 382 may process the executable instructions and/or data structures in part by directly accessing the computer program product, for example by reading from a CD-ROM disk inserted into a disk drive peripheral of the computer system 380. Alternatively, the processor 382 may process the executable instructions and/or data structures by remotely accessing the computer program product, for example by downloading the executable instructions and/or data structures from a remote server through the network connectivity devices 392. The computer program product may comprise instructions that promote the loading and/or copying of data, data structures, files, and/or executable instructions to the secondary storage 384, to the ROM 386, to the RAM 388, and/or to other non-volatile memory and volatile memory of the computer system 380.
In some contexts, the secondary storage 384, the ROM 386, and the RAM 388 may be referred to as a non-transitory computer readable medium or a computer readable storage media. A dynamic RAM embodiment of the RAM 388, likewise, may be referred to as a non-transitory computer readable medium in that while the dynamic RAM receives electrical power and is operated in accordance with its design, for example during a period of time during which the computer system 380 is turned on and operational, the dynamic RAM stores information that is written to it. Similarly, the processor 382 may comprise an internal RAM, an internal ROM, a cache memory, and/or other internal non-transitory storage blocks, sections, or components that may be referred to in some contexts as non-transitory computer readable media or computer readable storage media.
A method of establishing a call detail record may comprise receiving a call initiation request from an electronic device, converting the call from Voice over Internet Protocol to the Public Switched Telephone Network, routing the call to a mobile communication device, and establishing a call detail record for the call. The call may be routed to the mobile communication device based on a cross listing of the mobile communication device in a routing table. The call detail record may be generated, created and/or established by a telephone exchange. In an embodiment, the call detail record may be used for billing purposes. The billing may be based on the amount of time an application on the mobile communication device was running. The application may be a Skype application, an ooVoo application, a Vonage application, a Google Talk application, or some other application. The call detail record may be generated, created, and/or established upon completion of the call.
While several embodiments have been provided in the present disclosure, it should be understood that the disclosed systems and methods may be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. The present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the intention is not to be limited to the details given herein. For example, the various elements or components may be combined or integrated in another system or certain features may be omitted or not implemented.
Also, techniques, systems, subsystems, and methods described and illustrated in the various embodiments as discrete or separate may be combined or integrated with other systems, modules, techniques, or methods without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Other items shown or discussed as directly coupled or communicating with each other may be indirectly coupled or communicating through some interface, device, or intermediate component, whether electrically, mechanically, or otherwise. Other examples of changes, substitutions, and alterations are ascertainable by one skilled in the art and could be made without departing from the spirit and scope disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5303378 | Cohen | Apr 1994 | A |
5321735 | Breeden et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5764889 | Ault et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796952 | Davis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6131024 | Boltz | Oct 2000 | A |
6177860 | Cromer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219712 | Mann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6363150 | Bhagavath et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6477180 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507904 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6614893 | Paiz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6668322 | Wood et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6691230 | Bardon | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6754784 | North et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6823454 | Hind et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824064 | Guthery et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6895234 | Laursen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7043241 | Sladek et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7366806 | Milenkovic et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387240 | Ziegler | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7519824 | Peyravian et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7552467 | Lindsay | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571364 | Whetsel | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7650645 | Langendorf et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7716720 | Marek et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7873837 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7895642 | Larson et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7921303 | Mauro, II | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8060449 | Zhu | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8073428 | Khetawat et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086238 | Kosar | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8112794 | Little et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8190919 | Natarajan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8204480 | Lindteigen et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8238823 | Maugars et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271336 | Mikurak | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8316237 | Felsher et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8402543 | Ranjan et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8413229 | Mullick et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429409 | Wall et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8443420 | Brown et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447983 | Beck et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8494576 | Bye et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8504097 | Cope et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8588749 | Sadhvani et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8631247 | O'Loughlin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632000 | Laracey | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649770 | Cope et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8667607 | Paczkowski et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8707056 | Felton | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712407 | Cope et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8718554 | Abel | May 2014 | B2 |
8719586 | Paleja et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8726343 | Borzycki et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8738333 | Behera et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8750839 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8752140 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8762298 | Ranjan et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8787873 | Hitt et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8793808 | Boccon-Gibod | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797875 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8811971 | Corda et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8831998 | Cramer et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8839460 | Shirlen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850568 | Shirlen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856600 | Zadigian et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8862181 | Cope et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8863252 | Katzer et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8881977 | Paczkowski et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8886925 | Qureshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8954588 | Bertz et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8984592 | Paczkowski et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8989705 | Katzer et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9015068 | Bertz et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9021585 | Paczkowski et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9027102 | Katzer et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9049013 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9049186 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9066230 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9069952 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9104840 | Paczkowski et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9118655 | Paczkowski et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
20010041591 | Carroll | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020035697 | McCurdy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020091569 | Kitaura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095389 | Gaines | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020156911 | Croman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166070 | Mualem et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174344 | Ting | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181503 | Montgomery, Jr. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184325 | Killcommons et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194361 | Itoh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194496 | Griffin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045273 | Pyhalammi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093667 | Dutta et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110046 | Cofta | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126225 | Camble et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172163 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216143 | Roese et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229514 | Brown | Dec 2003 | A2 |
20030237002 | Oishi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040158840 | Rothman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040202328 | Hara | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233844 | Yu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234049 | Melideo | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243810 | Rindborg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015601 | Tabi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050045719 | Yang | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052994 | Lee | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091505 | Riley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123596 | Kohane et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125396 | Liu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138433 | Linetsky | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050181796 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228892 | Riley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235166 | England et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239481 | Seligmann | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050272445 | Zellner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289355 | Kitariev et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030291 | Dawson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036851 | DeTreville | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040641 | Dawson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060129488 | Vincent | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156026 | Utin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164978 | Werner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171537 | Enright | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190605 | Franz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212853 | Sutardja | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224901 | Lowe | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245438 | Sajassi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258289 | Dua | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259790 | Asokan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261949 | Kim et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277307 | Bernardin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277433 | Largman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011061 | East | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038648 | Chetwood et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061535 | Xu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078988 | Miloushev et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079120 | Bade et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094273 | Fritsch et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094691 | Gazdznski | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118880 | Mauro, II | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143210 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162759 | Buskey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167167 | Jiang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177771 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180120 | Bainbridge et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186212 | Mazzaferri et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197261 | Humbel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214332 | Sonoda et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070276969 | Bressy et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277223 | Datta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080005794 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014867 | Finn | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020745 | Bae et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022374 | Brown et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051142 | Calvet et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080092213 | Wei et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097793 | Dicks et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108321 | Taaghol et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109662 | Natarajan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121687 | Buhot | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146280 | Sasse et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155271 | Barck et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159129 | Songhurst et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159131 | Hoeflin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162361 | Sklovsky | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176538 | Terrill et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188178 | Maugars et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201212 | Hammad et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201578 | Drake | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208681 | Hammad et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212503 | Lipford et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232259 | Thomson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244758 | Sahita et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090047923 | Jain et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055278 | Nemani | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070272 | Jain | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075592 | Nystrom et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089449 | Day | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113425 | Ports et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118839 | Accapadi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144161 | Fisher | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090147958 | Calcaterra et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090154348 | Newman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164800 | Johansson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182605 | Lappas et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182634 | Park et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192915 | Fernandez | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193491 | Rao | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090227290 | Chien | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248445 | Harnick | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271321 | Stafford | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281947 | Erel | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300599 | Piotrowski | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312011 | Huomo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320028 | Gellerich et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031325 | Maigne et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052844 | Wesby | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075669 | Sparks et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077487 | Travis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082977 | Boyle et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125904 | Nice et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128598 | Gandhewar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130170 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142517 | Montemurro et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146589 | Safa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153721 | Mellqvist | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162028 | Frank et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100190469 | Vanderveen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198943 | Harrang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217709 | Aabye et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223348 | Przybysz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228937 | Bae et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241847 | van der Horst et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246818 | Yao | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100269156 | Hohlfeld et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274726 | Florek et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279653 | Poltorak | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281139 | Deprun | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291896 | Corda | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299313 | Orsini et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306353 | Briscoe et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318802 | Balakrishnan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328064 | Rogel | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110010720 | Smith et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014948 | Yeh | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021175 | Florek et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035604 | Habraken | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050713 | McCrary et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055084 | Singh | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063093 | Fung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072492 | Mohler et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078081 | Pirzadeh et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082711 | Poeze et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107426 | Yen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112968 | Floreck et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113479 | Ganem | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130635 | Ross | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138064 | Rieger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145926 | Dalcher et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154032 | Mauro, II | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166883 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173090 | Miller et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202916 | VoBa et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208797 | Kim | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212707 | Mahalal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216701 | Patel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226853 | Soh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237190 | Jolivet | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238573 | Varadarajan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238992 | Jancula et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246609 | Kim | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110251892 | Laracey | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254687 | Arponen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258462 | Robertson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276677 | Osuga et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281558 | Winter | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294418 | Chen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003983 | Sherlock et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011572 | Chew et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021683 | Ma et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023583 | Sallam | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028575 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029997 | Khan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036347 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040662 | Rahman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052801 | Kulkarni | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072481 | Nandlall et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072979 | Cha et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084211 | Petrov et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120084438 | Raleigh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120084836 | Mahaffey et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089700 | Safruti et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102202 | Omar | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120115433 | Young et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123868 | Brudnicki et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130839 | Koh et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131178 | Zhu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137117 | Bosch et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137119 | Doerr et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143703 | Wall et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147750 | Pelletier et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120149327 | Raboisson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120149338 | Roundtree | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150601 | Fisher | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154413 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158467 | Hammad et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159163 | von Behren et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159612 | Reisgies | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163206 | Leung et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168494 | Kim | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120178365 | Katz et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120178366 | Levy et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190332 | Charles | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191536 | Chen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196529 | Huomo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120196586 | Grigg et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198519 | Parla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202423 | Tiedemann et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207165 | Davis | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226582 | Hammad | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226772 | Grube et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238206 | Singh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120252480 | Krutt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120255016 | Sallam | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120258690 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259722 | Mikurak | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266076 | Lockhart et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266220 | Brudnicki et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272306 | Benaloh et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120282924 | Tagg et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284195 | McMillen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291095 | Narendra et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295588 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297187 | Paya et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303961 | Kean et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304286 | Croll et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309345 | Wake et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324293 | Grube et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329425 | Velusamy et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130014259 | Gribble et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019323 | Arvidsson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031374 | Thom et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034081 | Ban et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130035056 | Prasad et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047197 | Saroiu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054474 | Yeager | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130062417 | Lee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130067552 | Hawkes et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130074067 | Chowdhry | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086385 | Poeluev | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086684 | Mohler | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097302 | Khedouri et al. | Apr 2013 | A9 |
20130097657 | Cardamore et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130105565 | Kamprath | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109307 | Reisgies et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130111095 | Mehrotra et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117186 | Weinstein et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124583 | Ferguson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125114 | Frascadore | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136126 | Wang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138521 | Want et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138959 | Pelly et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130140360 | Graylin | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130143489 | Morris et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145429 | Mendel et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159021 | Felsher | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159186 | Burdnicki et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159710 | Khan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160120 | Malaviya et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130174147 | Sahita et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130175984 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191632 | Spector et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212704 | Shablygin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262264 | Karstoft | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130263212 | Faltyn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290709 | Muppidi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305333 | Katzer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310003 | Sadhvani et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332456 | Arkin | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343181 | Stroud et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345530 | McRoberts et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347064 | Aissi | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347103 | Veteikis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140007182 | Qureshi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140007222 | Qureshi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047548 | Bye et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059642 | Deasy et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074508 | Ying et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089243 | Oppenheimer | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089699 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104287 | Nalluri et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106709 | Palamara et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140141718 | Stromberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155025 | Parker et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173747 | Govindaraju | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188738 | Huxham | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215196 | Berlin | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140245444 | Lutas et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254381 | Racz Sandor et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267332 | Chhabra et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279558 | Kadi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281544 | Paczkowski et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298026 | Isozaki et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150106805 | Melander et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150169885 | Paczkowski et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172928 | Katzer et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2011025433 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2012064171 | May 2012 | WO |
2013170228 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014004590 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014018575 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014025687 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014158431 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Mar. 20, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,731, filed May 29, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,731, filed May 29, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Oct. 24, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/463,797, filed May 3, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 1, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/463,797, filed May 3, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jun. 12, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,980, filed Apr. 5, 2012. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,980, filed Apr. 5, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 29, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,980, filed Apr. 5, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Oct. 24, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/463,801, filed May 3, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/463,801, filed May 3, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jul. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,203, filed May 11, 2012. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,203, filed May 11, 2012. |
Advisory Action dated May 29, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,203, filed May 11, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated May 12, U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,177, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jun. 6, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/571,348, filed Aug. 10, 2012. |
Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/571,348, filed Aug. 10, 2012. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/571,348, filed Aug. 10, 2012. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 23, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/571,348, filed Aug. 10, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2013; U.S. Appl. No. 13/540,437, filed Jul. 2, 2012. |
Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 1, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/557,213, filed Jul. 25, 2012. |
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/557,213, filed Jul. 25, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/557,213, filed Jul. 25, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Nov. 27, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/610,856, filed Sep. 11, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance date Jan. 31, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/610,856, filed Sep. 11, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jun. 5, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,200, filed Jul. 24, 2012. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,200, filed Jul. 24, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,200, filed Jul. 24, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Aug. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,357, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Apr. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,383, filed Mar. 13, 2013. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated May 23, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,383, filed Mar. 13, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,383, filed Mar. 13, 2013. |
Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,777, filed Aug. 25, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jul. 17, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,778, filed Aug. 25, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jul. 17, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,779, filed Aug. 25, 2012. |
Office Action dated May 5, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,450, filed Mar. 5, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Aug. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/831,486, filed Mar. 14, 2013. |
First Action Interview Pre-Interview Communication dated Dec. 27, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,873, filed Jun. 18, 2009. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,873, filed Jun. 18, 2009. |
Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,873, filed Jun. 18, 2009. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,873, filed Jun. 18, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,873, filed Jun. 18, 2009. |
Zimmerman, Ann, “Check Out the Future of Shopping”, The Wall Street Journal, Business, May 18, 2011, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703421204576329253050634700.html. |
Garry, Michael, Kroger Test Prepares for Mobile Future:, SN, Supermarket News, Jun. 13, 2011, http://supermarketnews.com/technology/kroger-test-prepares-mobile-future. |
Jones, Sally, “Industry Trends in POS Hardware for Mobile Devices”, Aug. 31, 2011, http://pointofsale.com/20110831734/Mobile-POS-News/industry-trends-in-pos-hardware-for-mobile-devices.html. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 2, 2013, PCT/US13/40673, filed on May 10, 2013. |
Giesecke & Devrient, “The OTA Platform in the World of LTE”, Jan. 2011, http://www.gi-de.com/gd—media/media/en/documents/brochures/mobile—security—2/cste—1/OTA-and-LTE.pdf. |
Pesonen, Lauri, “Development of Mobile Payment Ecosystem—NFC Based Payment Services”, Aug. 27, 2008. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 4, 2014, PCT/US13/47729, filed on Jun. 25, 2013. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 4, 2014, PCT/US13/51750, filed on Jul. 24, 2013. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 22, 2014, PCT/US13/53617, filed on Aug. 5, 2013. |
Ahmed, Farid, et al., “Correlation-based Watermarking Method for Imagine Authentication Applications”, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Feb. 17, 2004, pp. 1834-1838. |
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,203, filed May 11, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,177, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Sep. 25, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,969, filed Jun. 27, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,357, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Nov. 12, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,145, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 19, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,778, filed Aug. 25, 2012. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,450, filed Mar. 5, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 26, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/831,486, filed Mar. 14, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Nov. 7, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,404, filed Mar. 13, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Oct. 29, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,282, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Oct. 21, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,325, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Nov. 20, 2014, PCT/US13/40673, filed on May 10, 2013. |
Perrig, Adrian, et al., “SPINS: Security Protocols for Sensor Networks,” ACM, Sep. 2002, vol. 8, pp. 521-534. |
Clark, CJ., et al. “Anti-tamper JTAG TAP design enables DRM to JTAG registers and P1687 on-chip instruments”, 2010 IEEE, International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST). Pub. Date: 2010. Relevant pp. 19-24. http://ieeexplore. ieee. org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5513119. |
Lee, Jeremy, et al., “A Low-Cost Solution for Protecting IPs Against Scan-Based Side Channel Attacks,” 24th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. Pub. Date: 2006. http//ieeexplore. ieee. org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber= 1617569. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 11, 2014, PCT/US14/16651, filed on Feb. 16, 2014. |
Cope, Warren B., et al., “Electronic Purchase Transaction Trust Infrastructure”, filed May 29, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,731. |
Katzer, Robin D., et al., “Secure Placement of Centralized Media Controller Application in Mobile Access Terminal”, filed Nov. 11, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,177. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Policy and Charging Enforcement Function”, filed Jun. 27, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,969. |
Bye, Stephen James, et al., “Trusted Signaling in Long Term Evolution (LTE) 4G Wireless Communication”, filed Feb. 7, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,319. |
Cope, Warren B., et al., “Extended Trusted Security Zone Radio Modem”, filed Nov. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 14/090,667. |
Katzer, Robin D., et al., “Trusted Access to Third Party Applications Systems and Methods”, filed Jul. 25, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/557,213. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Access to Peripheral Devices”, filed Jan. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,714. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., Enablement of a Trusted Security Zone Authentication for Remote Mobile Device Management Systems and Methods, filed Mar. 15, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,357. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Communication Addressing on an Electronic Device”, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Application No. 13/844,145. |
Bye, Stephen James, et al., “Protection for Multimedia Files Pre-Downloaded to a Mobile Device”, filed Apr. 15, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,376. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Point-of-Sale and Automated Teller Machine Transactions Using Trusted Mobile Access Device”, filed Mar. 13, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,383. |
Bertz, Lyle T., et al., “Framework for Real-Time Brokering of Digital Content Delivery,” filed Aug. 25, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,777. |
Bertz, Lyle T., et al.,“Reservations in Real-Time Brokering of Digital Content Delivery,” filed Aug. 25, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,778. |
Bertz, Lyle T., et al., “File Retrieval in Real-Time Brokering of Digital Content Delivery,” filed Aug. 25, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,779. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Watermark”, filed Mar. 5, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,450. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Re-Provisioning and Re-Use Capability for Refurbished Mobile Devices”, filed Mar. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/831,486. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Enhanced with Trusted Hardware Drivers”, filed Mar. 13, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,404. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Method for Enabling Hardware Assisted Operating System Region for Safe Execution of Untrusted Code Using Trusted Transitional Memory”, filed May 20, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,435. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Processing Location Within a Graphics Processing Unit”, filed Jul. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/939,175. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Restricting Access of a Portable Communication Device to Confidential Data or Applications via a Remote Network Based on Event Triggers Generated by the Portable Communication Device”, filed Mar. 15, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,282. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “JTAG Fuse Vulnerability Determination and Protection Using a Trusted Execution Environment”, filed Mar. 15, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,325. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Containers for the Protection and Confidentiality of Trusted Service Manager Data”, filed Mar. 14, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/831,463. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Security Zone Containers for the Protection and Confidentiality of Trusted Service Manager Data”, filed Feb. 16, 2014, PCT Application No. PCT/US14/16651. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Verifying Applications Using a Trusted Security Zone”, filed Aug. 12, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,112. |
Bye, Stephen James, et al., “Delivering Digital Content to a Mobile Device via a Digital Rights Clearing House”, filed Apr. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/860,338. |
McCracken, Billy Gene, Jr., et al. “Mobile Communication Device Profound Identity Brokering Framework”, filed Jun. 6, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,190. |
Urbanek, Robert E., Subscriber Identity Module Virtualization:, filed Nov. 20, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,474. |
Krieger, Michael D., et al., “Billing Varied Service Based on Tier”, filed on Nov. 8, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,663. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Display and Transmission of Digital Ticket Documentation”, filed Jan. 24, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,047. |
Loman, Clint H., et al., “Verification of Mobile Device Integrity During Activation”, filed Mar. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/229,532. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Network Based Temporary Trust Extension to a Remote or Mobile Device Enabled via Specialized Cloud Services”, filed Jul. 29, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,330. |
Cordes, Kevin R., et al., “Digest of Biographical Information for an Electronic Device with Static and Dynamic Portions”, filed on Apr. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,141. |
Cordes, Kevin R., et al., “Radio Frequency Identity (RFID) Chip Electrically and Communicatively Coupled to Motherboard of Mobile Communication Device”, filed on Apr. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,139. |
Cordes, Kevin R., et al., “System for Managing a Digest of Biographical Information Stored in a Radio Frequency Identity Chip Coupled to a Mobile Communication Device”, filed on Apr. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,138. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 22, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,203, filed May 11, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,969, filed Jun. 27, 2012. |
Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/571,348, filed Aug. 10, 2012. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,319, filed Feb. 7, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,777, filed Aug. 25, 2012. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,779, filed Aug. 25, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 26, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,450, filed Mar. 5, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Dec. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,435, filed May 20, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 20, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,435, filed May 20, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,325, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/831,463, filed Mar. 14, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Feb. 4, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,663, filed Nov. 8, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Feb. 25, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,047, filed Jan. 24, 2014. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,139, filed Apr. 4, 2013. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 8, 2015, PCT/US13/47729, filed Jun. 25, 2013. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 19, 2015, PCT/US13/53617, filed on Aug. 5, 2013. |
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart—International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 5, 2015, PCT/US13/51750, filed on Jul. 24, 2013. |
Katzer, Robin D., et al., “Web Server Bypass of Backend Process on Near Field Communications and Secure Elements Chips”, filed Feb. 26, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,850. |
Neson, Tracy L., et al., “Mated Universal Serial Bus (USB) Wireless Dongles Configured with Destination Addresses”, filed Jan. 26, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/606,011. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Code Generation and Verification to Prevent Fraud from Maleficent External Devices that Capture Data”, filed Jan. 14, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,218. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Mar. 25, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/532,588, filed Jun. 25, 2012. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Mar. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,319, filed Feb. 7, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated May 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/090,667, filed Nov. 26, 2013. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,145, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,404, filed Mar. 13, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Mar. 26, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/939,175, filed Jul. 10, 2013. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,282, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Mar. 24, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,112, filed Aug. 12, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Apr. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,474, filed Nov. 20, 2013. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,663, filed Nov. 8, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 9, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,047, filed Jan. 24, 2014. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Mar. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,138, filed Apr. 4, 2013. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,138, filed Apr. 4, 2013. |
Bertz, Lyle T., et al., “Framework for Real-Time Brokering of Digital Content Delivery,” filed Mar. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/659,614. |
Marquard, et al., “Infrastructure for Secure Short Message Transmission,” filed Apr. 7, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,077. |
Paczkowski, Lyle W., et al., “Trusted Code Generation and Verification to Prevent Fraud from Maleficent External Devices that Capture Data,” filed Jan. 14, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,218. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/085,474, filed Nov. 20, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jul. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,850, filed Feb. 26, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/571,348, filed on Aug. 10, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,319, filed on Feb. 7, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 4, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/090,667, filed Nov. 26, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,145, filed on Mar. 15, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 14, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/594,779, filed on Aug. 25, 2012. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,404, filed on Mar. 13, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 7, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/939,175, filed Jul. 10, 2013. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,282, filed on Mar. 15, 2013. |
Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,282, filed on Mar. 15, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2015, U.S. Appl. no. 13/964,112, filed Aug. 12, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 1, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/075,663, filed on Nov. 8, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/229,532, filed Mar. 28, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug., 28, 2015, Application U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,330, filed Jul. 29, 2014. |
Faipp Pre-Interview Communication dated Aug. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,141, filed on Apr. 4, 2013. |
FAIPP Pre-Interview Communication dated Jun. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,139 filed on Apr. 4, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,138, filed on Apr. 4, 2013. |
Henderson, Tristan, et al., “On the Wire, Congestion Pricing: Paying Your Way in Communications Networks,” University College London, Sep.-Oct. 2001, retrieved from: http://tristan.host.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk!research/pubs/ieeeic01.pdf. |