The present application is related to co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/779,443 entitled “System and Method for Printing Multiple Postage Indicia,” filed Jul. 18, 2007, and Ser. No. 11/729,148 entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” filed Mar. 27, 2007, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates generally to value bearing indicia and, more particularly, to value bearing indicia using transparent or translucent media.
Various forms of value bearing indicia have been used for a number of years. For example, postal services around the world have used value bearing indicia in the form of stamps for evidencing payment for postal services. Such stamps are provided in predetermined value denominations and typically comprise some form of preprinted paper or other relatively fragile medium. The stamps are generally applied to a postal item for which they are to provide evidence of postal service payment using a suitable adhesive to prevent removal and reuse of the stamp without their destruction (e.g., tearing of the stamp medium). Moreover, the stamps are “cancelled” (i.e., marked as used) by the postal service when processing the postal item to prevent reuse of the stamp.
Although the foregoing stamps provide useful value bearing indicia, they have not always provided the convenience desired by their users. For example, they must be pre-purchased to be available for use by a postal customer when needed. Moreover, they are available only in the value denominations in which they are provided, whereas a user may desire some other denomination (e.g., a denomination which is not an integer multiple of the value bearing indicia value denomination). Accordingly, value bearing indicia in the form of postage meter indicia has been used by postal services.
Postage meter indicia provide value bearing indicia which are generated in desired value denominations by a user at or very near the time of posting a postal item. Such postage meter indicia includes both the more traditional value bearing indicia provided by a postage meter strike and the more modern information based indicia provided by processor-based postage metering systems (e.g., personal computer and/or Internet postage metering system configurations). The postage meter indicia may be imprinted directly upon the postal item or upon transfer media (e.g., paper label stock). In either case, the postage meter indicia is typically affixed to the postal item in such a way as to prevent removal and reuse of the postage meter indicia without their destruction. Moreover, the postage meter indicia are generated to include information therein (e.g., date, information uniquely linking the postage meter indicia to the postal item, information linking the postage meter indicia to the sender and/or intended recipient of the postal item, etc.) which prevent their reuse (e.g., at a date other than included in the indicium, on a postal item other than the one linked to the indicium, on a postal item to or from entities other than the sender and/or intended recipient linked to the indicium, etc.).
Although the foregoing postage meter indicia provide value bearing indicia having value determinations closely matched to the postal item with which they are to be used, they do not provide the ready availability that the aforementioned stamps do. That is, a user typically must utilize some form of meter system to generate the potage meter indicia, which may prove inconvenient and time consuming when the user desires to prepare a single postal item for posting. Accordingly, value bearing indicia in the form of fungible postage indicia has been more recently made available by postal services. Examples of fungible postage indicia are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,939,062 entitled “System and Layout for Proper Printing of NETSTAMPS and Other Labels” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,083,345 entitled “Roll Label Layout and System for Proper Printing of NETSTAMPS,” assigned to the present assignee, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Fungible postage indicia provide value bearing indicia which is somewhat of a hybrid between the aforementioned stamps and postage meter indicia. That is, a plurality of fungible postage indicia may be pre-produced in desired value denominations for later use in posting postal items. Thus, although some form of meter system is used to generate the fungible postage indicia, a plurality of such fungible postage indicia may be generated at a convenient time for their later use. The user may therefore be afforded the advantages provided by the use of postage meters (e.g., generating indicia in desired value denominations, obtaining postage value without traveling to a post office, postage accounting and reporting functionality, etc.) while enjoying convenience similar to that of “ready made” stamps.
The fungible postage indicia are printed upon transfer media (e.g., paper label stock) for affixing to the postal item in such a way as to prevent removal and reuse of the fungible postage indicia without their destruction. Although the fungible postage indicia may include a machine readable (e.g., two dimensional barcode) or other validation information portion similar to that of an information based indicium, the fungible postage indicia are fungible because they are dateless and are used without specified recipient addresses. Moreover, because the machine readable or other validation information portion is to remain readable for use in validating the fungible postage indicia, cancellation (i.e., applying a mark to the face of the fungible postage indicia to indicate it having been used) of the fungible postage indicia is generally not performed by the postal service. Thus, the use of paper label stock is relied upon to prevent removal and reuse of the fungible postage indicia without their destruction (e.g., tearing of the fungible postage indicia medium). Such paper label stock, however, often does not provide a postage indicia which is aesthetically pleasing when applied to a postal item (e.g., the color of the label stock does not match the stock of the postal item).
Various techniques may be implemented to prevent the copying and reproduction of fungible postage indicia (e.g., using xerographic equipment or computer-based scanner equipment). For example, special inks which are invisible under natural light, but which fluoresce under light of a particular wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet light), may be applied to the fungible postage indicia medium (e.g., as a marker) to render reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective. Similarly, special inks which visually appear to have different characteristics (e.g., change color), such as thermo-chromatic inks, may be applied to the fungible postage indicium medium to render reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective. However, these security measures, although effectively thwarting duplication, do nothing to prevent reuse of an otherwise properly generated fungible postage indicia. Accordingly, for the use of such fungible postage indicia in the United States Postal Service (USPS), the USPS has required that the fungible postage indicia be physically destroyed if removed from the postal item more than 24 hours after application thereto in order to prevent removal and reuse of the fungible postage indicia.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods which provide secure value bearing indicia using transparent or translucent (collectively referred to herein as clear) media. Embodiments of the invention provide value bearing indicia in the form of fungible postage indicia borne on clear media (referred to herein as clear fungible postage indicia) and having one or more security features to prevent or otherwise discourage reuse and/or copying. Accordingly, value bearing indicia of the present invention may be provided in a form which may be unobtrusively applied to a host object (e.g., a postal item) without substantially impacting the aesthetic appeal of the host object and without substantial risk of improper reuse or copying of the value bearing indicia.
Clear media utilized in fungible postage indicia of embodiments of the invention may comprise various plastics (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, vinyl, polyester, etc.) formed into a thin sheet giving a desired level of transparency/translucency and flexibility of the material. Such plastic media, however, typically presents a relatively resilient membrane which is resistant to tearing, and other destructive forces. Accordingly, the use of clear media for fungible postage indicia presents an increased risk that the clear fungible postage may be reused.
Embodiments of the invention provide clear fungible postage indicia having one or more controlled cuts in the surface of the clear media to facilitate the destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia when removal is attempted after affixing to a host object. Controlled cuts utilized according to embodiments of the invention may comprise perforation lines (e.g., one or more discrete cuts fully penetrating the clear medium interleaved with one or more uncut portions of clear medium), score lines (e.g., a cut line partially penetrating the clear medium leaving some portion of clear medium uncut), etc.
Controlled cut configurations of embodiments of the invention present sufficient structural integrity for printing of the indicia and their initial application to a host object while introducing areas of diminished structural integrity adapted to facilitate destruction or otherwise disabling the clear fungible postage indicia when removal from a host object is attempted. For example, the ratio of the perforations (i.e., the ratio of perforation cut length to remaining web length) is adapted according to embodiments of the invention for the attributes of the clear medium and/or adhesive used in order to provide suitable security. Similarly, the score depth is adapted according to embodiments of the invention for the attributes of the clear medium and/or adhesive used in order to provide suitable security.
Patterns in which controlled cuts are provided in the clear media are preferably adapted to facilitate desired destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia. For example, a controlled cut pattern may be utilized which results in separation of particular portions of the clear fungible postage indicia (e.g., separation of a human readable portion, a machine readable portion, and an marker portion). Additionally or alternatively, a controlled cut pattern may be utilized which results in the breaking up of particular portions of the clear fungible postage indicia (e.g., breaking any of a human readable portion, a machine readable portion, and/or an marker portion into smaller pieces). Controlled cut patterns utilized according to embodiments of the invention may avoid controlled cuts in certain areas, such as a machine readable portion, in order to avoid interfering with the functionality of that portion of the clear fungible postage indicia. Alternatively, controlled cuts of a controlled cut pattern may be disposed in certain orientations and/or areas of the clear fungible postage indicia so as to facilitate the breaking up of a particular portion without substantially interfering with the functionality of that portion prior to destruction of the indicium.
Clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments may implement techniques in addition to or in the alternative to the foregoing controlled cuts for providing security. For example, embodiments of the invention may utilize adhesive patterning to facilitate destruction or otherwise disabling the clear fungible postage indicia when removal from a host object is attempted. According to an embodiment, adhesive patterning may deposit adhesive in particular areas and leave other areas free of adhesive (e.g., areas near and/or underlying a controlled cut) to work cooperatively with a controlled cut to facilitate separation of portions of the clear medium when the fungible postage indicia is removed from a host object.
Embodiments of the invention may additionally or alternatively use adhesive adaption to provide security with respect to clear fungible postage indicia. According to an embodiment, adhesive adaption in the form of adhesive colorization may be utilized to provide a pattern (e.g., image, logo, text, information, etc.) within the adhesive. Such a pattern is preferably visible through the clear fungible postage indicia and is provided in such a way as to be visibly altered or damaged (e.g., separated from the clear medium, partially separated from the clear medium, smudged or smeared, etc.) if the clear fungible postage indicia is removed from a host object. Additional or alternative embodiments utilize adhesive adaption in the form of adhesion characteristic variation to facilitate destruction or otherwise disabling the clear fungible postage indicia when removal from a host object is attempted. Such adhesion characteristic variation may comprise the use of adhesives of different adhesion characteristics used at different portions of the clear medium (e.g., exterior edges, portions at or near controlled cuts, beneath particular aspects of the fungible postage indicia, etc.) for facilitating destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia.
Security features, such as the use of special inks, may be utilized to prevent the copying and reproduction of clear fungible postage indicia according to embodiments of the invention. For example, special inks which are invisible under natural light, but which fluoresce under light of a particular wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet light), may be applied to the clear fungible postage indicia medium to render reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective. The use of special inks which are invisible under natural light are particularly useful with respect to clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments due to their use not substantially impacting the aesthetics provided by the use of the clear fungible postage indicia. Special inks which visually appear to have different characteristics (e.g., change color), such as thermo-chromatic inks, may additionally or alternatively be applied to the clear fungible postage indicium medium to render reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective. However, such visible inks may not be preferred according some embodiments due to its impact upon the aesthetics provided by the use of the clear fungible postage indicia.
The clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments of the invention provide postage indicia which are conveniently available for use, are available in denominations closely matching that needed for a particular postal item, are unobtrusive when applied to a host object, and provides security attributes facilitating their destruction upon removal from a host object. Accordingly, clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments herein provides a combination of features in postage indicia heretofore unavailable.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each, of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
It should be appreciated that, although embodiments are described herein with reference to the value bearing indicia comprising postage indicia, value bearing indicia provided according to the concepts herein may be utilized with respect to transactions other than postal services. For example, secure value bearing indicia on clear media provided according to embodiments of the invention may be utilized with respect to tickets, coupons, remittances, etc.
Referring still to
Human readable indicia information 101 may comprise various information useful to a user of the indicium, a service provider processing the indicium, and/or other persons likely to be exposed to the indicium. For example, human readable indicia information 101 of the illustrated embodiment includes value amount, postage designation, postage class, meter number, and meter zip code.
Machine readable information 102 may comprise various information, provided in a machine readable format, useful to automated systems handling the indicium, such as mail processing systems, indicia validation systems, electronic commerce systems, and/or other systems likely to be exposed to the indicium. For example, machine readable information 102 of the illustrated embodiment comprises a two dimensional bar code providing robust (e.g., error correcting) encoding of information (e.g., on the order of 20-40 bytes) in a format which is readable by optical scanners. The machine readable information may comprise, for example, value amount, postage class, meter number, authentication information (e.g., digital signature), and/or other information useful in processing the indicium. According to embodiments of the invention, machine readable information 102 comprises a reduced content information based indicia (referred to as IBI light) as shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/729,148 entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security”, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Markers 103a and 103b may comprise various forms of marks to prevent the copying and reproduction of fungible postage indicia (e.g., using xerographic equipment or computer-based scanner equipment). For example, marker 103a may comprise one or more mark imprinted using a special ink which is invisible under natural light, but which fluoresce under light of a particular wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet light), thereby rendering reproduction of clear fungible postage indicium 100 by typical copying techniques ineffective. Additionally or alternatively, marker 103b may comprise one or more mark imprinted using a special ink which visually appears to have different characteristics (e.g., change color), such as thermo-chromatic inks, thereby rendering reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective. Because clear fungible postage indicium 100 of embodiments is adapted to provide a value bearing indicia in a form which may be unobtrusively applied to a host object (e.g., a postal item) without substantially impacting the aesthetic appeal of the host object and without substantial risk of improper reuse or copying of the value bearing indicia, embodiments of the invention may utilize, the aforementioned invisible inks rather than inks which visually appear to have different characteristics. It should be appreciated that markers 103a and/or 103b may comprise a simple mark (e.g., the presence of which is simply detected or not), a more complex mark (e.g., a facing identification mark or other mark providing relatively simple information such as postal item face orientation), or an informational mark (e.g., barcode or other rich information carrying mark) according to embodiments of the invention.
Medium code 104 may comprise various information useful in creating and/or validating clear fungible postage indicium 100. For example, medium code 104 may comprise a medium serial number used in controlling the generation of clear fungible postage indicium 100. Such a medium serial number and/or other contents of medium code 104 may be encoded into machine readable indicia information 102, such as for use in validating clear fungible postage indicium 100. The use of serial numbers, as may comprise medium code 104, for controlling the generation of fungible postage indicia is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,158 entitled “System and Method for Providing Computer-Based Postage Stamps”, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. It should be appreciated that medium code 104 of embodiments may be adapted to provide security features in addition to or in the alternative to the aforementioned use in creating and/or validating clear fungible postage indicium 100. For example, medium code 104 may be adapted to provide indication of tampering with or reuse of an otherwise valid clear fungible postage medium, such as using adhesive patterning techniques described below.
Aesthetics 105 may comprise various marks, information, etc. provided for aesthetic purposes. For example, aesthetics 105 may comprise logos of a service provider facilitating generation of clear fungible postage indicium 100, a postal service provider, an entity for which clear fungible postage indicium 100 was generated, etc. It should be appreciated that aesthetics 105 may be utilized for purposes in addition to or in the alternative to mere aesthetic ornamentation. For example, aesthetics 105 may include greetings, advertisements, or other messages. Likewise, aesthetics 105 may be adapted to provide security attributes, such as through imprinting aesthetics 105 using special inks as described above, using adhesive patterning techniques described below, etc. For example, aesthetics 105 may be printed using special inks, such as the florescent or thermo-chromatic inks discussed above, for providing security with respect to clear fungible postage indicium 100.
Clear fungible postage indicium 100 may be created by a user for later use in posting postal items as needed. For example, a user may utilize computer system 240 shown in
System 240 used to generate clear fungible postage indicium herein may comprise a processor (e.g., a processor from the CORE processor family available from Intel Corporation), memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), disk memory, optical memory, flash memory, and/or the like), and suitable input and output functionality (e.g., display, keyboard, digital pointer, printer, microphone, speaker, scanner, touch screen, biometric sensor, and/or the like) operable under control of an instruction set (e.g., operating system, application program, applet, etc.) providing for the generation of clear fungible postage indicia herein. System 240 may communicate with server system 220, such as via network 230 (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), the Internet, the public switched telephone network (PSTN), a wireless network, and/or the like), for obtaining postage value to be included in the value bearing indicia, to generate the value bearing indicia, etc. Additional detail with respect to the generation of fungible postage indicia is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,939,062 entitled “System and Layout for Proper Printing of NETSTAMPS and Other Labels” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,083,345 entitled “Roll Label Layout and System for Proper Printing of NETSTAMPS,” previously incorporated by reference.
Sheet 200 of the illustrated embodiment comprises carrier 210 upon which a plurality of transfer areas are provided for separation and use as value bearing indicia. For example, a plurality of postage stamp sized transfer areas made from a plastic medium (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, vinyl, polyester, etc.) giving a desired level of transparency/translucency may be provided upon carrier 210 for printing upon by a printer (e.g., laser printer, inkjet printer, thermal transfer printer, dot matrix printer, etc.) of system 240 for providing clear fungible postage indicia herein. Sheet 200 and/or the transfer sections thereon may be preprinted or otherwise pre-provided with one or more portions of a completed clear fungible postage indicia according to embodiments of the invention. For example, transfer sections of sheet 200 may be pre-provided with all or a portion of human readable information 101, medium code 104 and/or aesthetics 105. Printing of the remaining portions of the clear fungible postage indicia may be provided by a printer of system 240, perhaps in cooperation with or under control of server 220, to complete the clear fungible postage indicia.
It should be appreciated that although a sheet having a plurality of transfer sections for creating clear fungible postage indicia is shown, embodiments are not limited to the use of sheets or even configurations in which a plurality of clear fungible postage indicia are created at any particular time. For example, embodiments of the invention may utilize a carrier in the form of a roll, such as may be utilized in a label printer or other continuous web printer.
Clear media utilized in clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments of the invention may present a relatively resilient membrane which is resistant to tearing, delaminating, and other destructive forces. Accordingly, the use of clear media for fungible postage indicia presents an increased risk that the clear fungible postage indicia may be reused if not otherwise adapted to discourage such reuse. Clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments of the present invention are adapted to include one or more security features to prevent or otherwise discourage reuse and/or copying of such fungible postage indicia borne on clear media.
Embodiments of the invention provide clear fungible postage indicia having one or more controlled cut in the surface of the clear media to facilitate the destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia when removal is attempted after affixing to a host object. Controlled cuts utilized according to embodiments of the invention may comprise perforation lines, score lines, or combinations thereof. For example, perforation line 310 shown in
Controlled cut configurations of embodiments of the invention present sufficient structural integrity for printing of the clear fungible postage indicia (e.g., passing through a printer of computer system 240) and their initial application to a host object (e.g., removal from carrier 210 and application upon postal item 201) while introducing areas of diminished structural integrity adapted to facilitate destruction or otherwise disabling the clear fungible postage indicia when removal from a host object (e.g., subsequent removal from postal item 201 after application thereto, perhaps after a period of time sufficient for an adhesive of the indicium to set) is attempted. Embodiments of the invention adapt attributes of the controlled cuts for characteristics of the clear fungible postage indicia, such as characteristics of the clear media (e.g., the tearing strength, the shear strength, the resilience, the dimensional stability, etc.), characteristics of the adhesive (e.g., the strength, the areas of application, the resilience, etc.), and/or the printing (e.g., the areas of printing, the types of ink used, the type of printing technique used, etc.).
It should be appreciated that an adhesive, such as adhesive 211 shown in
The ratio of the perforations (i.e., the ratio of perforation cut length (A in
The depth of score lines (i.e., the ratio of the depth of a scoring cut (X in
It should be appreciated that embodiments of the invention may utilize controlled cuts implementing a combination of the aforementioned perforation lines and score lines. For example, an embodiment of the invention may utilize one or more perforation line with respect to one area of a clear fungible postage indicium and one or more score line with respect to another area of the clear fungible postage indicium. Moreover, the scoring technique may be utilized with respect to a perforation line, whereby in addition to a perforation ratio a score depth less than the full depth of the clear media is implemented (e.g., the perforation cuts shown in
Attributes of the controlled cuts adapted for characteristics of the clear fungible postage indicia may comprise features in addition to or in the alternative to the aforementioned perforation ratio and score depth. For example, patterns in which controlled cuts are provided in the clear media are preferably adapted to facilitate desired destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia.
Controlled cuts utilized according to embodiments of the invention may be disposed at particular locations and/or oriented on a clear fungible postage indicium to encourage or ensure destruction of the indicium if removal from a host object (e.g., postal item 201) is attempted. For example, a person attempting to remove an indicium from a host object tends to attempt to initially separate the indicium from the host object at the corners of the indicium medium. Thus, controlled cuts of embodiments of the invention may be disposed at or near the corners or other expected site of initial separation to cause separation of portions of the indicium medium as the person attempts to separate the indicium from the host object. Additionally, a person attempting to remove an indicium from a host object tends to peel the indicium from the host object after separating a small portion from the host object. Thus, controlled cuts of embodiments of the invention may be oriented with regard to one or more expected directions of peeling the indicium medium to cause separation of portions of the indicium medium as the person attempts to separate the indicium from the host object.
Controlled cuts of embodiments of the invention not only provide for separation of portions of the medium for destruction of the indicium, but may additionally result in physical deformation, distortion, etc. (collectively, alteration) of the medium. For example, the portions of perforation line 310 remaining uncut may be adapted (e.g., sized and/or shaped) to provide sufficient structural integrity to cause stretching or other alteration of the medium as the portions of the medium are separated when an attempt to separate the indicium from the host object is made. Such alteration of the medium renders the separated portions of the clear fungible postage indicium more difficult, if not impossible, to subsequently piece together without readily apparent signs of tampering (e.g., stretched portions of the torn perforation line prevent the separated pieces from abutting one another to appear unified as before separation of the indicium from the host object.
The portions of the indicium medium separated by controlled cuts of embodiments herein may be selected to further facilitate rendering the indicium unusable, to avoid interference with particular portions of the indicium, to facilitate printing of various indicia information, etc. Accordingly, various controlled cut patterns may be utilized according to embodiments of the invention.
Directing attention to
Additionally or alternatively, a controlled cut pattern or patterns may be utilized which result in the breaking up of particular portions of the clear fungible postage indicia (e.g., breaking any of a human readable portion, a machine readable portion, and/or an marker portion into smaller pieces). Directing attention to
It should be appreciated that disposing controlled cuts through various information printed upon the indicium medium may result in some impact upon the quality of the printed information. For example, surface perturbations associated with the controlled cuts may result in small spaces where ink or other printing material is missing from the printed rendition of the information. Such impacts upon the quality of the printed information are expected to generally be acceptable for processing and validation of the clear fungible postage indicia. For example, machine readable indicia information 102 is likely to be the most susceptible to problems resulting from reduced printing quality. However, machine readable coding techniques, such as those of the PDF417, DATAMATRIX, MAXICODE, and other two-dimensional bar codes, provide error correction able to accommodate relatively poor print quality and other sources of damage to the barcode. Nevertheless, it may be desirable to provide a controlled cut pattern which does not pass through selected information printed upon the indicium.
Directing attention to
It should be appreciated that the embodiments of
Although
Clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments may implement techniques in addition to or in the alternative to the foregoing controlled cuts for providing security. For example, embodiments of the invention may utilize a laminated or multi-layer clear medium configuration adapted to facilitate destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia produced therewith. According to embodiments of the invention, multiple layers (e.g., 2 or 3 layers) of very thin clear plastic media may be adhered together to provide a laminated clear medium (e.g., to provide a top layer upon which information of a clear fungible postage indicium is printed and a bottom layer upon which an adhesive is provided to adhere the clear fungible postage indicium to a host object, wherein the top layer and bottom layer are laminated together to provide a multi-layer medium). The adhesive or adhesives used in laminating the layers may be selected to provide sufficient integrity of the laminated clear medium to facilitate handling of clear fungible postage indicia, such as when being printed, removed from a carrier substrate, and placed upon a host object, but which results in delaminating or partial delaminating when an attempt is made to remove the clear fungible postage indicia from the host object. The adhesive or adhesives used in laminating the layers of the laminated clear medium may, for example, provide less adhesive force than that of the adhesive or adhesives used to affix the clear fungible postage indicia upon the host object. It should be appreciated that the foregoing laminated clear medium security techniques may be implemented in combination with the controlled cuts discussed above, such as to provide a clear medium which is highly likely to facilitate the destruction of a clear fungible postage indicium made therewith.
Additionally or alternatively, techniques for providing security implemented according to embodiments of the invention may comprise features other than adaptation of the clear medium itself. For example, embodiments of the invention may utilize adhesive patterning to facilitate destruction or otherwise disabling the clear fungible postage indicia when removal from a host object is attempted. According to an embodiment, adhesive patterning may deposit adhesive in particular areas and leave other areas free of adhesive (e.g., areas near and/or underlying a controlled cut) to work cooperatively with a controlled cut to facilitate separation of portions of the clear medium when the fungible postage indicia is removed from a host object. For example, an adhesive pattern may be applied to the back of the clear medium of clear fungible postage indicium 100 in a pattern corresponding to that of the controlled cuts, leaving areas of no adhesive corresponding to one or more controlled cuts, in order to facilitate separation of the portions of the indicium medium at the controlled cuts.
Embodiments of the invention may additionally or alternatively utilize adhesive adaption in the form of adhesion characteristic variation to facilitate destruction or otherwise disabling the clear fungible postage indicia when removal from a host object is attempted. Such adhesion characteristic variation may comprise the use of adhesives of different adhesion characteristics used at different portions of the clear medium (e.g., exterior edges, portions at or near controlled cuts, beneath particular aspects of the fungible postage indicia, etc.) for facilitating destruction of the clear fungible postage indicia.
Adhesive adaption in the form of visible characteristics may additionally or alternatively be used to provide security with respect to clear fungible postage indicia. According to an embodiment, adhesive adaption in the form of adhesive colorization may be utilized to provide a pattern (e.g., image, logo, text, information, etc.) within the adhesive. For example, medium code 104, aesthetics 105, (
Adhesive colorization and patterning may be provided in a number of ways according to embodiments of the invention. For example, a desired pattern (medium code 104, aesthetics 105, (
It should be appreciated that one or more of the foregoing security features adapted to provide an indication of removal or attempted removal of a clear fungible postage indicium from a host object may not be the only security features implemented according to embodiments of the invention. Security features, such as the use of special inks, may be utilized to prevent the copying and reproduction of clear fungible postage indicia according to embodiments of the invention. For example, special inks which are invisible under natural light, but which fluoresce under light of a particular wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet light), may be applied to clear medium 110 (e.g., to form all or a part of include human readable information 101, machine readable information 102, markers 103a and 103b, medium code 104, and/or aesthetics 105) to render reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective.
The use of special inks which are invisible under natural light (e.g., inks which fluoresce under ultraviolet light) are particularly useful with respect to clear fungible postage indicia of embodiments due to their use not substantially impacting the aesthetics provided by the use of the clear fungible postage indicia. For example, markers 103a and/or 103b may be comprised entirely of such special inks for use in automated processing of postal items, facing of postal items for processing, postage indicium validation, etc., without significantly impacting or otherwise altering the appearance of clear fungible postage indicia 100.
Special inks which visually appear to have different characteristics (e.g., change color), such as thermo-chromatic inks, may additionally or alternatively be applied to the clear fungible postage indicium medium to render reproduction by typical copying techniques ineffective. For example, aesthetics 105 may be provided to include a portion comprised of such special inks to facilitate validation of clear fungible postage indicia 100 through the use of special inks in an unobjectionable manner. Although such visible inks may not be preferred according some embodiments due to it impact upon the aesthetics provided by the use of the clear fungible postage indicia, there use in a subtle or otherwise aesthetically pleasing way may not be objectionable.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1684756 | Close | Sep 1928 | A |
1988908 | MacKinnon | Jan 1935 | A |
2825498 | Alves | Mar 1958 | A |
2887326 | Kramer | May 1959 | A |
2964232 | Levyn | Dec 1960 | A |
3221980 | Mercur | Dec 1965 | A |
3380648 | Lyra | Apr 1968 | A |
3658239 | Foutz | Apr 1972 | A |
3747837 | Wilson | Jul 1973 | A |
3938095 | Check, Jr. et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3978457 | Check, Jr. et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4245775 | Conn | Jan 1981 | A |
4271481 | Check, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4308299 | Check, Jr. et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4511793 | Racanelli | Apr 1985 | A |
4565317 | Kranz | Jan 1986 | A |
4629871 | Scribner et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641347 | Clark et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649266 | Eckert | Mar 1987 | A |
4661001 | Takai et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4682793 | Walz | Jul 1987 | A |
4709850 | Wagner | Dec 1987 | A |
4725718 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743747 | Fougere et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757537 | Edelmann et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760532 | Sansone et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763271 | Field | Aug 1988 | A |
4775246 | Edelmann et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784317 | Chen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800504 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800506 | Axelrod et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802218 | Wright et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4812994 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821195 | Baer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831554 | Storace et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831555 | Sansone et al. | May 1989 | A |
4853865 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862386 | Axelrod et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864618 | Wright et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868757 | Gil | Sep 1989 | A |
4872705 | Hartfeil | Oct 1989 | A |
4872706 | Brewen et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4900903 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900904 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4901241 | Schneck | Feb 1990 | A |
4907161 | Sansone et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910686 | Chang et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919325 | Culver | Apr 1990 | A |
4933849 | Connell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934846 | Gilham et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4947333 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4993752 | Juszak | Feb 1991 | A |
4998204 | Sansone et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5025141 | Bolan | Jun 1991 | A |
5065000 | Pusic | Nov 1991 | A |
5085470 | Peach et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091771 | Bolan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5111030 | Brasington et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119306 | Metelits et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136647 | Haber et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5200903 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5237506 | Horbal et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239168 | Dursty, Jr. et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5316208 | Petkovsek | May 1994 | A |
5319562 | Whitehouse | Jun 1994 | A |
5329713 | Lundell | Jul 1994 | A |
5341505 | Whitehouse | Aug 1994 | A |
5360628 | Butland | Nov 1994 | A |
5388049 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5410642 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423573 | de Passille | Jun 1995 | A |
5425586 | Berson | Jun 1995 | A |
5437441 | Tuhro et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439721 | Pedroli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449200 | Andric et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454038 | Cordery et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471925 | Heinrich et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476420 | Manning | Dec 1995 | A |
5490077 | Freytag | Feb 1996 | A |
5494445 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501393 | Walz | Mar 1996 | A |
5510992 | Kara | Apr 1996 | A |
5524995 | Brookner et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5554842 | Connell et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573277 | Petkovsek | Nov 1996 | A |
5598970 | Mudry et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600562 | Guenther | Feb 1997 | A |
5601313 | Konkol et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602743 | Fraytag | Feb 1997 | A |
5606507 | Kara | Feb 1997 | A |
5612889 | Pintsov et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615123 | Davidson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617519 | Herbert | Apr 1997 | A |
5650934 | Manduley | Jul 1997 | A |
5651238 | Belec et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5666215 | Fredlund et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666284 | Kara | Sep 1997 | A |
5682318 | Kara | Oct 1997 | A |
5717597 | Kara | Feb 1998 | A |
5717980 | Oka et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737729 | Denman | Apr 1998 | A |
5774886 | Kara | Jun 1998 | A |
5778076 | Kara et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791553 | Fabel | Aug 1998 | A |
5796834 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801364 | Kara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801944 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5812991 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5819240 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5822739 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5825893 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5884277 | Khosla | Mar 1999 | A |
5902439 | Pike et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923406 | Brasington et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924738 | Konkol et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929415 | Berson | Jul 1999 | A |
5932139 | Oshima et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936865 | Pintsov et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5995985 | Cai | Nov 1999 | A |
6005945 | Whitehouse | Dec 1999 | A |
6010156 | Block | Jan 2000 | A |
6026385 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033751 | Kline | Mar 2000 | A |
D434438 | Kara | Nov 2000 | S |
6155476 | Fabel | Dec 2000 | A |
6173888 | Fabel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175826 | Malandra, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181433 | Hayama et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199055 | Kara et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208980 | Kara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209779 | Fabel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234694 | Brookner | May 2001 | B1 |
6249777 | Kara et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6296404 | Pierce et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311240 | Boone et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322192 | Walker | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6385504 | Pintsov et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415983 | Ulvr et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427021 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438530 | Heiden et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461063 | Miller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505179 | Kara | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505980 | Allday | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523014 | Pauschinger | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526391 | Cordery et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6594374 | Beckstrom et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595412 | Manduley | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6655579 | Delman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671813 | Ananda | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6692031 | McGrew | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697822 | Armatis et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701304 | Leon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722563 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735575 | Kara | May 2004 | B1 |
6820201 | Lincoln et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6834112 | Brickell | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834273 | Sansone et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6868406 | Ogg et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6904168 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6939062 | Ogg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946960 | Sisson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7069253 | Leon | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7083345 | Kuwahara | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7085725 | Leon | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117363 | Lincoln et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127434 | Burningham | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149726 | Lingle et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162460 | Cleckler et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166345 | Myers et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191158 | Ogg et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194957 | Leon et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7201305 | Correa | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7222236 | Pagel | May 2007 | B1 |
7234645 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243842 | Leon et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7266531 | Pintsov et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7305556 | Slick et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7396048 | Janetzke et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418599 | Peters | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7509291 | McBride et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7577618 | Raju et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7828223 | Leon et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7831518 | Montgomery et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010042052 | Leon | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054153 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020023057 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033598 | Beasley | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046195 | Martin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073039 | Ogg et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083020 | Leon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083021 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020149195 | Beasley | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190117 | Manduley | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002709 | Wu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030270 | Franko et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037008 | Raju et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059635 | Naasani | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078893 | Shah et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030085565 | Asay | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088426 | Benson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101143 | Montgomery et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101147 | Montgomery et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101148 | Montgomery et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030140017 | Patton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144972 | Cordery et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040070194 | Janetzke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040174012 | Hagen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200902 | Ishioroshi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215523 | Wulff et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220935 | McGraw et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236938 | Callaghan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040241424 | Barbera-Guillem | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254898 | Parker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050065897 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071296 | Lepkofker | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071297 | Kara | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080751 | Burningham | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082818 | Mertens | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114276 | Hunter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050195214 | Reid et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060116971 | Beckstrom et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136347 | Reichelsheimer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173796 | Kara | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060287096 | O'Kelley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005518 | Beckstrom et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011995 | Weaver et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070017985 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026184 | Ehreiser et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100672 | McBride et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198441 | Kara | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255664 | Blumberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090125561 | Garcia | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4409386 | Sep 1995 | DE |
0137737 | Apr 1985 | EP |
153816 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0282359 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0507562 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0596706 | May 1994 | EP |
0658861 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0926630 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2580844 | Oct 1986 | FR |
2246929 | Feb 1992 | GB |
2251210 | Jul 1992 | GB |
2271452 | Apr 1994 | GB |
63147673 | Jun 1988 | JP |
05-132049 | May 1993 | JP |
09-508220 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11-249205 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2005215905 | Aug 2005 | JP |
WO-8801818 | Mar 1988 | WO |
WO-9427258 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-199519016 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-9740472 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9814909 | Apr 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,443, Kara. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/729,148, Stamps.com. |
Brown, B., “Internet Postage Services,” PC Magazine, Jun. 6, 2000, p. 133, Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, 1 page. |
Menezes, A.J. et al., “Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” CRC Press LLC, 1997 (Excerpt—Cover pages and pp. 512-515), 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,519 to Clem, filed Nov. 10, 2010, and entitled “Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items and Systems and Methods for Providing Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items,” 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 7 pages. |
Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 515,253/1997, dated Apr. 21,2009; 5 pages (with English language translation). |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 126 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/038,029 to Leon et al, filed Mar. 1, 2011 and entitled “Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 131 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/081,356 to Leon et al, filed Apr. 6, 2011 and entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” 136 pages. |
“Endicia Announces PictureltPostage™ , ” Jun. 6, 2005, http://www.endicia.com/-/media/Files/About%20Us/Press%20Room/Endicia_pr05-06-06.ashx>, 2 pages. |
“Information-Based Indicia Program (IBIP) Performance Criteria for Information-Based Indicia and Security Architecture for Closed IBI Postage Metering Systems (PCIBI-C),” Jan. 12, 1999, The United States Postal Service (USPS), 49 pages. |
“Zazzle® Offers Zazzle Custom Stamps™ for Business,” May 17, 2006, https://www.zazzle.com/about/press/releases?pr=12624, 2 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 25 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 31 pages. |
Inverview Summary dated Sep. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,458 to Leon, filed Dec. 20, 2006, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Creating and Providing Shape-Customized, Computer-Based, Value-Bearing Items,” 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22. 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 29, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/197,044 to Raju et al., filed Jul. 16, 2002, and entitled “Generic Value Bearing Item Labels,” 7 pages. |
Porter, William, “Canadians Take to Vanity Stamps in Very Big Way,” Denver Post, Jul. 9, 2000, 2 pages. |
Ralph, J. “What's Selling: From Bricks and Mortar to Bricks and Clicks,” Playthings Magazine, Feb. 1, 2003, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/729,239 to Leon et al., filed Mar. 28, 2007 and entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” 131 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/316,240 to Leon, filed Dec. 9, 2008, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Facilitating Replacement of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 158 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/500,970 to Clem, filed Jul. 10, 2009, and entitled “Automatic Guarantee Delivery Tracking and Reporting for United States Postal Service Postage Refunds for Paid Computer-Based Postage,” 70 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,519 to Clem, filed Nov. 10, 2010, and entitled “Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items and Systems and Methods for Providing Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items,” 65 pages. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Feb. 19, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,458 to Leon, filed Dec. 20, 2006, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Creating and Providing Shape-Customized, Computer-Based, Value-Bearing Items,” 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 23 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/435,453 to Clem, filed May 16, 2006, and entitled “Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items and Systems and Methods for Providing Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items,” 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,458 to Leon, filed Dec. 20, 2006, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Creating and Providing Shape-Customized, Computer-Based, Value-Bearing Items,” 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/729,239 to Leon et al., filed Mar. 28, 2007, and entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 33 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 7, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,458 to Leon, filed Dec. 20, 2006, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Creating and Providing Shape-Customized, Computer-Based, Value-Bearing Items,” 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/435,453 to Clem, filed May 16, 2006, and entitled “Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items and Systems and Methods for Providing Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items,” 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/729,239 to Leon et al., filed Mar. 28, 2007, and entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” 6 pages. |
Appeal Decision dated Apr. 20, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia,” 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,458 to Leon, filed Dec. 20, 2006, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Creating and Providing Shape-Customized, Computer-Based, Value-Bearing Items,” 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/435,453 to Clem., filed May 16, 2006, and entitled “Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items and Systems and Methods for Providing Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items,” 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,871 to McBride et al., filed Dec. 8, 2006, and entitled “Formatting Value-Bearing Item Indicia,” 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 9 pages. |
Notice of Abandonment dated Jun. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/991,241 to Kara, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and entitled “System and Method for Generating Personalized Postage Indicia” , 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 5, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,768 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing item Customization Security,” 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 15, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,871 to McBride et al., filed Dec. 8, 2006, and entitled “Formatting Value-Bearing Item lndicia,” 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,871 to McBride et al., filed Dec. 8, 2006, and entitled “Formatting Value-Bearing Item Indicia,” 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 122 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 131 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 122 pages. |
Computergram International, “U.S. Postal Service to Introduce PC Postage Plans Today,” Aug. 9, 1999, No. 3720, 1 page. |
Terrell, “Licking Stamps: A PC and a Printer Will End Trips to the Post Office,” U.S. News & World Report, Sep. 28, 1998, vol. 125, No. 12, 4 pages. |
“Miniature, Coin-Shaped Chip is Read or Written with a Touch,” News Release, Dallas Semiconductor, Jul. 1991, 9 pages. |
Stamps: Beyond Elvis, May 15, 1994, New York Times Archives, 2 pages. |
Minnick, Robert, “Postage Imprinting Apparatus and Methods for Use With a Computer Printer”, Apr. 27, 1995, 71 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated May 11, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Items,” 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 5 pages. |
International Search Report attached to PCT Application WO/88/01818, dated Nov. 30, 1987, 2 pages. |
International Search Report issued for Application PCT/US96/16366, dated Jun. 13, 1997, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/435,453 to Clem, filed May 16, 2006, and entitled “Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items and Systems and Methods for Providing Rolls of Image-Customized Value-Bearing Items,” 69 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,458 to Leon, filed Dec. 20, 2006, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Creating and Providing Shape-Customized, Computer-Based, Value-Bearing Items,” 77 pages. |