This invention relates to security devices for doors.
Conventionally, a door may be secured by a lock having a metal deadbolt. A deadbolt is generally strong enough that it will not break if an intruder tries to break down the door. When a door fails, however, it is commonly due to the deadbolt or door latch breaking through the door or the door frame as shown in
U.S. Pat. No. 4,763,499 to Boyle teaches a door security system that includes a lock security assembly, a reinforced strike plate and a door hinge assembly. The lock security assembly includes a wraparound cover plate that encircles the exterior lock portion, wraps around the edge of the door over the deadbolt, then encircles the interior lock portion. The cover plate does not extend significantly in the vertical direction along the edge of the door from the deadbolt. The lock security assembly further includes angle iron-shaped members attached to the wraparound cover plate. The angle iron-shaped members extend horizontally from the cover plate and reinforce the door proximate to the deadbolt. The reinforced strike plate is attached to the doorjamb and does not extend significantly in the vertical direction along the door jamb. The door hinge assembly reinforces the door and the door jamb proximate to the hinges.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,666,309 to Zarzycki teaches a plate that fits over the edge of a door and is used with a doorknob having the tumbler assembly located within. The plate does not extend significantly in the vertical direction along the edge of the door. Further, the plate does not accommodate a deadbolt assembly.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,673,605 to Allenbaugh teaches a plate covering the edge of the door proximate to the deadbolt and latch. The plate does not extend significantly in the vertical direction along the edge of the door.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,141,234 to Hoos teaches a guard mount structure for a deadbolt assembly. The guard covers only the edge of the door proximate to the deadbolt assembly.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,397,168 to Rotondi et al. teaches an L-shaped bracket for reinforcing a door proximate to the deadbolt and door latch. The L-shaped bracket is a plate including a first leg covering a portion of one face of the door and an integral second leg affixed to the edge of the door. The first leg includes passages for the doorknob and the deadbolt lock assembly. The second leg includes passages for the door latch and the deadbolt. The bracket doesn't continue to the inner face of the door and does not extend significantly in the vertical direction along the edge of the door.
The devices in the art tend to reinforce only one of the door frame or the door. Further, the devices in the art only cover the area proximate to the lock in the door or the strike plate in the door frame. Thus the force applied by the intruder trying to break down the door is directed in the proximity of the deadbolt.
Therefore, a security device for a door that reinforces a larger portion of the door and distributes an impact applied to the door is desired in the art.
The invention comprises, in one form thereof, a security device for a door comprising a door reinforcing plate that is angled and crimped into a U-shape and over bend mounted to the edge of the door and a frame plate, which is a flat plate mounted to the door frame. This security device reinforces a larger part of the door and door frame than other reinforcing plates in the art and in an embodiment, distributes the force due to an impact on the door over substantially the entire length of the door.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become apparent and be better understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a is an isometric view of a section of the door frame and the frame plate of the security device of
b is a cross-sectional view of a section of the door and the door reinforcing plate of the security device of
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate the preferred embodiments of the invention and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring to
The door reinforcing plate 12 is angled and crimped into a U-shape, as shown in
Referring to
In use, the door 16 is secured by closing the door 16 such that the door latch 23 engages the door latch receptacle 19b and the deadbolt lock assembly 20 is operated normally such that the deadbolt 21 engages the deadbolt receptacle 19a. When an impact is applied to the door 16 such as by an intruder trying to kick in the door 16 or when a crowbar is used to try and pry open the door 16, the deadbolt 21 transmits the force from the door 16 to the frame 18. The door reinforcing plate 12 and the frame plate 14 provide hard materials to reinforce the door 16 and the frame 18 where the deadbolt 21 is acting on them. Further, the door reinforcing plate 12 distributes the force applied to the door 16 by the deadbolt 21 along substantially the entire vertical edge of the door 16. The frame plate 14 distributes the force applied to the frame 18 by the deadbolt 21. This distribution of force in combination with the hard reinforcing materials allows the door 16 and the frame 18 to take a significantly increased amount of force applied by a would-be intruder.
Referring now to
A third embodiment of the security device is shown in
In a forth embodiment,
It should be particularly noted that the edges of the door 16 may be mortised such that the outer surfaces of the door reinforcing plate 12, the top edge plate 112, the bottom edge plate 114, and the second vertical edge plate 116 are flush with the outer surface of the door 16. This may improve the way the door fits in the door frame and avoid misalignment issues between the deadbolt and the deadbolt receptacle.
Experimentation has shown that the security device disclosed in the first embodiment is sufficient to thwart an intruder. The added hardened materials required for the subsequent embodiments may increase the strength of the door and security device, however, they also increase the weight and cost of the same.
It should be even further particularly noted that an advantage of the invention is that the security device may be used with a new or existing door and door frame. Further, the security device may be installed on a door and door frame made of substantially any material. This provides the ability to retrofit doors or even to rehabilitate and improve doors that have been broken into.
While the invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the scope of the invention.
Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope and spirit of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
306806 | Barnes | Oct 1884 | A |
631431 | Phelps | Aug 1899 | A |
940261 | MaGruder | Nov 1909 | A |
950926 | Keil | Mar 1910 | A |
2018663 | Fitch | Oct 1935 | A |
2489072 | Ausubel | Nov 1949 | A |
3271919 | Olton | Sep 1966 | A |
3666309 | Zarzycki | May 1972 | A |
3673605 | Allenbaugh | Jun 1972 | A |
3910612 | Guiraud | Oct 1975 | A |
3955387 | Best et al. | May 1976 | A |
4118827 | Yamamoto | Oct 1978 | A |
4129020 | Gonzalez | Dec 1978 | A |
4130311 | Sushan | Dec 1978 | A |
4139999 | Allenbaugh | Feb 1979 | A |
4141234 | Hoos | Feb 1979 | A |
4397168 | Rotondi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4484463 | Hennessy | Nov 1984 | A |
4522048 | Davis | Jun 1985 | A |
4534487 | Rapata | Aug 1985 | A |
4548061 | Nilsson | Oct 1985 | A |
4548062 | Kaufman | Oct 1985 | A |
4752517 | Beitel | Jun 1988 | A |
4763499 | Boyle | Aug 1988 | A |
4858384 | Blankenship | Aug 1989 | A |
4865370 | Francis | Sep 1989 | A |
4869087 | Day | Sep 1989 | A |
4977705 | Guetle, Jr. | Dec 1990 | A |
5031946 | Yarrow | Jul 1991 | A |
5070650 | Anderson | Dec 1991 | A |
5131189 | Mascotte | Jul 1992 | A |
5316353 | McKernan | May 1994 | A |
5400628 | Ryan | Mar 1995 | A |
5475044 | Stein | Dec 1995 | A |
5566509 | Long | Oct 1996 | A |
5603194 | Fridlyand et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5737878 | Raulerson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5822926 | Koike et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5915764 | MacDonald | Jun 1999 | A |
5950467 | Dong | Sep 1999 | A |
6318026 | Ayres et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6406076 | Zarzycki, Jr. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6691466 | Childress | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20030029093 | Childress | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2088726 | Aug 1994 | CA |
2409368 | Jun 1979 | FR |
2595748 | Sep 1987 | FR |
2265664 | Oct 1993 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050011132 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |