Patent Grant
9472067
Aspects of various embodiments are directed to security devices and methods.
A variety of applications benefit from protection of residents, employees, property and other items using security systems, such as to monitor and/or sense certain conditions such as a facility-operations problem or the presence of an unwanted intruder. Many such security systems are connected to a central control unit and monitored by an operator who can alert the appropriate emergency services in the event of an unwanted intruder. Other systems are self-contained, and operate without necessarily interacting with an outside system or operator.
While security systems can be helpful, challenges remain with regard to response time between detecting adverse situations and providing a remedy. Some security systems require interaction with a user in order to operate properly with regard to alerting to certain conditions, which can be costly and time-consuming. In addition, many systems generate false alarms, which can result in fees that are assessed by local authorities. Moreover, many systems are challenging to implement with occupied premises, with regard to discerning unwanted intruders.
These and other matters have presented challenges to implementing security for a variety of applications.
Various example embodiments are directed to security methods and apparatuses, and their implementation.
According to an example embodiment, an apparatus includes a presence sensor, an image sensor, a user authorization circuit and an electromechanical device. The presence sensor senses the presence of an individual, and the image sensor captures an image of the individual in response to the presence sensor sensing the individual's presence. The captured image is provided as image data, and a user authorization circuit identifies the individual as being authorized or unauthorized based upon the provided image data, as well as stored image data for authorized individuals (e.g., via a comparison or facial recognition approach). The electromechanical device operates with the user authorization circuit to deploy one or more deterrents in the vicinity of the individual, in response to the user authorization circuit identifying the individual as being unauthorized.
Another embodiment is directed to a method as follows. The presence of an individual is sensed, and an image of the individual is captured in response to the sensed presence. The captured image is provided as image data and received in a user authorization circuit that identifies the individual as being authorized or unauthorized based upon the provided image data and stored image data for authorized individuals. At least one deterrent is automatically deployed via an electromechanical device in the vicinity of the individual, in response to the user authorization circuit identifying the individual as being unauthorized.
The above discussion/summary is not intended to describe each embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure. The figures and detailed description that follow also exemplify various embodiments.
Various example embodiments may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While various embodiments discussed herein are amenable to modifications and alternative forms, aspects thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosure including aspects defined in the claims. In addition, the term “example” as used throughout this application is only by way of illustration, and not limitation.
The present invention is believed to be applicable to a variety of different approaches and arrangements for providing security services. The invention has been found to be particularly advantageous for addressing security monitoring needs in a residence or private office environment.
Various aspects of the present disclosure are directed toward security enhancement devices. The security enhancement devices, for example, can be provided as stand-alone devices and/or integrated into security monitoring devices (e.g., integrated motion detector and alarm). For instance, a security enhancement device, consistent with various aspects of the present disclosure, deters or halts intruders by recognizing an unwarranted or unwanted presence, and deploys a deterrent at or towards the unwarranted or unwanted presence. The security enhancement device, in certain embodiments, includes one or more deterrent aspects that deter or halt entrance into a secured area. Such tangible deterrents which would be capable of being felt, can include pepper sprays, skin irritants, eye irritants, offending odorant solutions, dye sprays, electroshock devices (e.g., stun guns), and/or temporal incapacitating devices (e.g., tranquilizer guns). Further, the deterrents can also include placebo deterrents (e.g., scented steam) that would mimic one or more of the above deterrents. Additionally, in certain embodiments, a security enhancement device that includes such tangible deterrents can deploy the deterrents at or towards the unwarranted or unwanted presence. Various aspects of the present disclosure are provided to prevent activation of a security enhancement device by wild/domestic animals (e.g., facial recognition, Infrared sensing). For instance, facial recognition can determine if an intruder is human, and Infrared sensing can verify the shape of the intruder as being human or non-human.
Security enhancement devices, consistent with various aspects of the present disclosure, are deployed in response to an unwarranted or unwanted presence. In certain embodiments, the deterrents are deployed in response to detection of an unwarranted or unwanted presence by a camera (video or still). In other embodiments, the deterrents are deployed in response to detection of an unwarranted or unwanted presence by an Infrared detection sensor (e.g., Passive Infrared (PIR) sensor). These deployment mechanisms can also be used in conjunction to provide an added level of security such that a presence is verified to be unwarranted or unwanted by a camera and an Infrared detection sensor.
Tangible deterrents such as pepper sprays, skin irritants, eye irritants, electro-shock and tranquilization are provided to stop further intrusion into a monitored space. Further, these type of deterrents and placebos such as odorants, and steam allow for deterring an intruder as well as indication to other further intruders that an area is being monitored. Moreover, a deterrent such as dye can assist in identification of an intruder due to the dye marking the intruder.
Additionally, in certain embodiments, security enhancement devices, consistent with various aspects of the present disclosure, are provided with an Infrared detection sensor. In this manner, such deterrents can be deployed by a security enhancement device in response to heat and/or movement sensed via Infrared detection.
In certain embodiments of a security enhancement device that includes a camera for use in detecting an unwarranted or unwanted presence, the presence is detected by use of facial recognition software. A database of facial profiles of authorized persons can be kept in memory of a stand-alone security enhancement device. Additionally, data of facial profiles of authorized persons can be kept in memory at a security monitoring device that includes a security enhancement device. Moreover, such data can be stored at a control panel that communicates with a stand-alone security enhancement device and/or with a security monitoring device that includes a security enhancement device. Further, data of facial profiles of authorized persons can be kept in memory at a control monitoring center that communicates with a stand-alone security enhancement device and/or with a security monitoring device that includes a security enhancement device. The database of facial profiles, in certain embodiments, can be provided at one or more of the stand-alone security enhancement device, security monitoring device, the control panel, and/or the control monitoring center. Wireless communication can occur using a transceiver for wirelessly communicating with central devices, monitoring devices, third-party monitoring stations, and/or an end user.
In the embodiments including facial recognition capabilities, a camera can compare the detected presence to the database of facial profiles of authorized persons to determine if the detected presence is unwarranted or unwanted. If the detected presence is determined as being unwarranted or unwanted, the device can deploy the deterrents. Additionally, embodiments of the present disclosure allow for a user to utilize a live view of the area monitored by the security enhancement device (or devices if multiple security enhancement devices are provided). In this manner, the user can decide whether or not to deploy the deterrents. A user can be alerted to the detected presence of any intrusion and/or the detected presence of an unwarranted or unwanted person. Further, a user can view the area monitored by the security enhancement device without engaging any alert, and can determine whether or not to deploy any deterrents.
Various aspects of the present disclosure allow for a user to remotely access the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device. The monitoring device and/or security enhancement device will receive a remote video access request. The request can originate, for example, from an application on a mobile phone or from a computer. The monitoring device and/or security enhancement device will then operate to authenticate the user. If the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device determines that authorization is invalid, access will be denied. If the alarm is not activated, access will be denied by the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device. If the alarm is activated, the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device will allow access. At this point, the user can view current video or images captures by the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device, the user can arm or disarm the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device, and/or the user can adjust the angles of the PIR sensor, the Infrared light emitting diodes, and/or the camera of the monitoring device and/or security enhancement device.
In some embodiments, a deterrent is coupled with the monitoring device and operable in response to remote user control. An actuator or other deployment mechanism is responsive to remote user inputs by dispensing the deterrent, in a predefined direction and/or in a direction controlled by the user. In more particular embodiments, a user is alerted in response to automated intruder detection, and is provided with an opportunity to remotely view the intruder (e.g., to assess identification) and control the dispensing of the deterrent. For example, such an approach may be implemented in which a central control center is coupled to a multitude of monitored environments. When an intruder is automatically detected (e.g., via face recognition), an alert can be provided along with live video to the central control center, where a user can assess the video and remotely deploy a deterrent. The deterrent can be deployed via the sensing device detecting the intruder, or via other devices located in a common environment and strategically placed for countering unwanted intrusion.
Moreover, the various aspects of the present disclosure are directed toward facial recognition as utilized to track intruders who enter and exit a property that is monitored by the security enhancement device. For instance, if a person entering a location monitored by the security enhancement device is determined to be authorized (proper credentials via, for example a proper password entered into a keypad or a key fob), the security enhancement device can utilize facial recognition to indicate that the person is authorized for future entrance even in the absence of the proper credentials. Additionally, the security enhancement device can recognize that a person not having the proper credentials is unauthorized for all future entrances to a monitored location. This authorization aspect for future entrance can also be modified by the user.
Various aspects of the present disclosure are also directed toward security enhancement devices that include various types of activation and deactivation. For example, the security enhancement device can include a clock function such that the device is active outside of business hours (e.g., 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.). Furthermore, the security enhancement devices can be activated by a user (e.g., via a key fob or passcode) to change from activated to deactivated states. Moreover, the security enhancement devices, in certain embodiments, include various levels of security activation. For instance, a lower level of security setting can allow for the device to deploy a selected type (as automatically selected by the CPU) of deterrent(s) in response to a detected intrusion (e.g., verified by facial recognition or Infrared sensing). In addition, a higher level of security setting can deploy deterrents in response to a detected and verified intrusion. Yet an even higher level of security setting can deploy deterrents in response to any verified or unverified intrusion.
In certain embodiments, security enhancement devices, consistent with various aspects of the present disclosure, utilize a camera or PIR to calculate the deployment distance of deterrents. For instance, a security enhancement device calculates the distance between an intrusion and the camera, based on normal spray radius and distance of a deterrent.
Various circuit-based building blocks and/or other modules may be implemented to carry out one or more of the operations and activities described herein, and/or shown in the block-diagram-type figures. In such contexts, these building blocks and/or modules represent circuits that carry out one or more of these, or other related operations/activities. For example, in certain of the embodiments discussed above, one or more blocks and/or modules are discrete logic circuits or programmable logic circuits configured and arranged for implementing these wireless communication protocols, as in the circuit modules/blocks described above. In certain embodiments, the programmable circuit is one or more computer circuits programmed to execute a set (or sets) of instructions (and/or configuration data). The instructions (and/or configuration data) can be in the form of firmware or software stored in, and accessible from, a memory (circuit).
Yet other embodiments are directed to combinations of the above aspects in which such above-discussed features and operations are operated together for application-specific functions and environments. For instance, in a camera-enabled security system that uses facial (or other bio-indicating) recognition and in response to the system detecting that an unauthorized person has been detected (e.g., within so many feet of the target area), rather than activating a spray on the unauthorized person, the system is capable of alerting the end user. In this aspect, the end user would have manual control over such activation feature(s) and/or can concurrently issue a ramp-up warning of a potential spray for audible/visual reception by the unauthorized person. It should be appreciated that other such combinations of the above aspects would also be useful for other such application-specific functions and environments.
Security systems, consistent with various aspects of the present disclosure, can include receivers and transmitters to communicate between security enhancement device(s) and a monitoring station. In some instances, a monitoring device may be implemented with only a transmitter. In other instances, a monitoring device may be implemented with only a receiver. Other implementations allow for one or more of the central devices (e.g., control panel(s)) and monitoring devices (e.g., peripheral device(s)) to have both a transmitter and receiver (transceiver). Thus, a transceiver is used herein to describe a receiver, transmitter or both a receiver and transmitter.
Communication between a central control panel device and security enhancement devices can occur via wireless communications. The wireless communications may be implemented using suitable frequencies. For instance, wireless communications frequencies in industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio bands (900 MHz, 433 MHz, 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz) have been found to be suitable for monitoring systems; however, alternate frequencies may be implemented in accordance with the particulars of the system or its intended implementation. Additionally, wireless communications between the central control panel device and monitoring/peripheral devices can occur via WiFi, Bluetooth®, 3G and/or 4G wireless (or another comparable protocol).
As discussed above, a control panel can communicate to the various devices using a variety of wireless data communication protocols. Specific wireless communication systems and devices are discussed in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,155,105 (see, e.g., FIG. 1A therein) entitled “Spread Spectrum Wireless Communication and Monitoring Arrangement and Method.” U.S. Pat. No. 8,155,105 is fully incorporated herein by reference for such related teachings. More particularly, this U.S. patent document is incorporated by reference with regards to exemplary circuits for implementing wireless communication between a central device and a remote monitoring device.
Security monitoring arrangements, as described above, are discussed in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,463,145 (see, e.g., FIG. 1A therein) entitled “Security Monitoring Arrangement and Method Using A Common Field Of View;” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,463,146 (see, e.g., FIG. 1A therein) entitled “Integrated Motion-Image Method And Device.” U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,463,145 and 7,463,146 are fully incorporated herein by reference for such related teachings. More particularly, this U.S. patent document is incorporated by reference with regards to exemplary circuits for implementing security monitoring device(s).
In accordance with another embodiment, an apparatus includes a presence sensor such as a motion-based sensor, and an image sensor that operates to collect an image of a premises or region. The apparatus also includes a user authorization circuit (e.g., a processor-type circuit) and an electromechanical device. The presence sensor senses the presence of an individual, such as by detecting Infrared or heat characteristics, and the image sensor captures an image of the individual in response to the presence sensor sensing the individual's presence. The captured image is provided as image data, such as by converting light to an electric signal at a photosensor. The user authorization circuit identifies the individual as being authorized or unauthorized based upon the provided image data as well as stored image data for authorized individuals, such as by comparing the data in a facial recognition approach. The electromechanical device operates/deploys one or more deterrents in the vicinity of the individual in response to the individual being identified as unauthorized (e.g., an intruder). Such a deterrent may, for example, include an undesirable or debilitating gas or liquid, sound or other materials that may act to dissuade an individual from approaching further.
In a more particular embodiment, the image data is transmitted over a network when the individual is identified as being unauthorized. This approach may, for example, save cost and power by transmitting the image data only when the individual is identified as unauthorized. Further, this approach can be used to mitigate false alarms, and also permit operation of the apparatus while authorized individuals are present. In other embodiments, the image data is transmitted in all cases, with an authorization being carried out remotely.
In certain embodiments, the apparatus (e.g., as part of a system) includes a remote interface that uses the transmitted image data to display an image of the individual identified as being unauthorized for verification by a user. A deterrent deployment instruction is transmitted over the network in response to a user input received from the user (e.g., if the user identifies the individual as being unauthorized). The electromechanical device is responsive to the transmitted deployment instruction by deploying the deterrent in the vicinity of the individual.
In more particular implementations, the presence sensor senses or determines a distance between the individual and the presence sensor, as the individual is moving relative to the presence sensor. The sensed distance can be used in a number of manners, to suit particular embodiments. In some embodiments, the distance is used to trigger the image sensor for image capture, thus timing the image capture with the sensed presence and, for certain implementations, saving power by permitting the image sensor to be off or in a low-power state until an individual comes within a certain distance threshold (e.g., moves past a first warning area).
In other embodiments, the image sensor captures the image of the individual in response to the distance between the individual and the presence sensor decreasing to a threshold distance level. In certain implementations, a warning circuit presents a warning to the individual in response to the sensed distance decreasing to a first threshold, and the image sensor captures the image in response to the sensed distance decreasing to a second threshold that is a shorter distance than the first threshold.
In certain distance-sensing embodiments, the apparatus includes an audio circuit that operates with the presence sensor to generate an audible sound warning in the vicinity of individuals identified as being unauthorized, and the sensed distance decreasing to a first threshold. The user authorization circuit transmits the image data in response to the sensed distance decreasing to a second threshold that is a shorter distance than the first threshold. In other implementations, the electromechanical device deploys one or more deterrents in the vicinity of the individual in response to the user authorization circuit identifying the individual as being unauthorized and the sensed distance decreasing to a second threshold that is a shorter distance than the first threshold. As characterized above and herein, the audible sound warning may include a sound informing the individual that a toxic substance will be deployed if the user moves further toward the presence sensor (e.g., where the deterrent does not include the toxic substance), and may be accompanied by flashing light emitted by a light-emitting circuit that operates to flash light at a rate that increases in response to the distance between the individual and the presence sensor decreasing.
In some embodiments, the user authorization circuit operates with the image sensor to process the image data based on facial recognition criteria, using stored facial recognition criteria indicative of authorized individuals. The individual is therein identified as being authorized or unauthorized via facial recognition. Certain embodiments are directed to a similar approach in which the individual is identified as being unauthorized when the image data does not match the stored image data.
In accordance with one or more embodiments, the presence of an individual is sensed and an image of the individual is captured in response to the sensed presence. The captured image is provided as image data and received in a user authorization circuit that identifies the individual as being authorized or unauthorized based upon the provided image data and stored image data for authorized individuals. When the user authorization circuit identifies the individual as being unauthorized, a deterrent such as a spray is automatically deployed via an electromechanical device in the vicinity of the individual.
In some implementations, the image data is transmitted over a network in response to identifying the individual as being unauthorized, and the transmitted data is used to display an image of the individual identified as being unauthorized for verification by a user. The user can then evaluate the data and transmit a deterrent deployment instruction over the network, with the deterrent being automatically deployed (e.g., without further human intervention) in response to the deterrent deployment instruction.
In some embodiments, the distance between the individual and a presence sensor that senses the individual's presence is sensed. In some implementations, before the image data is transmitted an audible sound warning is provided in the vicinity of the individual in response to the user authorization circuit identifying the individual as being unauthorized, and the sensed distance decreasing to a first threshold. If the sensed distance decreases to a second threshold that is a shorter distance than the first threshold (i.e., the individual moves further toward the sensor), the image data is transmitted for authorization by the user. In this regard, a warning is first provided and, if the individual is unauthorized and does not further approach the sensor, the image data may not necessarily be acquired and/or sent to the user. This may, for example, save power and expense. In other implementations, image capture is triggered based on the sensed distance, such as by energizing an image capture circuit in response to the individual moving within a certain threshold of the sensor. In still other implementations involve a warning such as the audible warning above, in connection with a delayed image capture that is also based on the individual moving within a threshold distance from the sensor that is closer than a distance at which the warning is provided.
Turning now to the figures,
In one embodiment, the presence sensor 110 monitors an area and, in response to sensing the presence of the individual 104, provides a signal to the image sensor 120 which responds by capturing an image of the individual 104. The captured image is presented as image data 160 to the authorization circuit 130, which accesses the image-based user data 132 for authorizing the individual 104. If the individual 104 is identified as unauthorized (or simply as not authorized), the authorization circuit 130 generates an output that is used, either directly as shown or indirectly, to dispense a deterrent from the electromechanical device 140.
The dashed line of the security device 102 denotes an embodiment in which the components as shown are integrated together, such as in a common security unit. However, the various components as shown may be implemented separately or with two more of the components implemented together but separate from the rest. For example, components 110, 120, 130 and 132 may be integrated on a common chip, and within a housing that includes the electromechanical device 140 and power source 150.
In another example, the presence sensor 110 and image sensor 120 are integrated in a common device, and the authorization circuit 130 is remote from the presence sensor 110 and image sensor 120. The apparatus 100 also includes a wireless communication circuit 160 that wirelessly communicates the image data between the image sensor 120 and the user authorization circuit 130. In another embodiment, the apparatus 100 also includes a wireless communication circuit 170, which wirelessly communicates an alarm signal to a control panel in response to the individual 104 being identified as unauthorized. Such an approach may, for example, involve the use of a wireless sensor that also operates to dispense a deterrent, or in which the control panel controls the dispensing of a deterrent from a different but nearby device.
Collected image data is analyzed at block 250. If the individual is identified as authorized, the process continues at block 210. In some implementations, a delay is carried out at block 265, such as to allow time for an authorized user to move out of a protected area and not require reimaging. In other implementations, individuals identified as authorized are tracked at block 265, and a delay is carried out with respect to presence sensing until after the user leaves the scene. In still other implementations, the presence sensing and imaging is carried out while an authorized individual is still present, to detect the presence of an unauthorized individual that is also in the same area. Such an approach may, for example, be useful for detecting an unauthorized individual sneaking up behind an authorized individual attempting to enter a building.
If the image data is does not match stored image data at block 260, the detected individual is identified as being unauthorized at block 270, and a deterrent is deployed at block 280 as discussed herein. The process can then continue at block 210, with an optional delay at block 265 as described above.
In a more particular implementation, the imaging circuitry is energized at block 230 so long as the presence of one or more individuals is detected. The image data is collected at block 240 and analyzed at block 250 to identify the presence of different individuals, and independently ascertain whether each individual is authorized or unauthorized. In certain implementations in which different individuals are identified as authorized and unauthorized in a common vicinity, the relative position of each individual is tracked and the deterrent is deployed at block 280 toward the unauthorized individual. Such an approach may, for example, be coupled with warnings presented to one or both individuals, prior to the deterrent being deployed. In certain implementations under such conditions, the authorized user may disable the deployment of the deterrent, such as by presenting a password (e.g., verbally) or key that is recognized and processed to disable deterrent deployment. Such an approach may, for example, be carried out in the apparatus 100, such as with the authorization circuit 130 operating to identify and track different individuals, and control the electromechanical device 140 for dispensing the deterrent accordingly. In certain such embodiments involving the apparatus 100, the electromechanical device includes one or more motors or other motion controllers that operate to direct a nozzle or other deployment device to dispense the deterrent at the tracked location of the unauthorized individual.
Various blocks, modules or other circuits may be implemented to carry out one or more of the operations and activities described herein and/or shown in the figures. In these contexts, a “block” (also sometimes “logic circuitry” or “module”) is a circuit that carries out one or more of these or related operations/activities (e.g., sensing motion, sensing distance, or controlling the dispensing of a deterrent). For example, in certain of the above-discussed embodiments, one or more modules are discrete logic circuits or programmable logic circuits configured and arranged for implementing these operations/activities, as in the circuit modules shown in
Certain embodiments are directed to a computer program product (e.g., nonvolatile memory device), which includes a machine or computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be executed by a computer (or other electronic device) to perform these operations/activities.
Various embodiments described above may be implemented together and/or in other manners. One or more of the items depicted in the present disclosure can also be implemented separately or in a more integrated manner, or removed and/or rendered as inoperable in certain cases, as is useful in accordance with particular applications. In view of the description herein, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3634846 | Fogiel | Jan 1972 | A |
| 4266216 | Trusty | May 1981 | A |
| 4347590 | Heger et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4540977 | Taillens et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4772875 | Maddox et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| D302951 | Kotlicki et al. | Aug 1989 | S |
| 4857912 | Everett, Jr. et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4864136 | Behlke | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4882567 | Johnson | Nov 1989 | A |
| D307560 | Andrews et al. | May 1990 | S |
| D312054 | Melman | Nov 1990 | S |
| 5026990 | Marman et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5077548 | Dipoala | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5155474 | Park et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5202661 | Everett et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5237330 | Yaacov et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5299971 | Hart | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5382944 | Dipoala et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5398057 | Tapp | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402000 | Owens, II | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5424718 | Muller et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5448290 | VanZeeland | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5448320 | Sakai et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450062 | DiPoala | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5473368 | Hart | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5515029 | Zhevelev et al. | May 1996 | A |
| D381283 | Soreo | Jul 1997 | S |
| 5657076 | Tapp | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661471 | Kotlicki | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5693943 | Tchernihovski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5703368 | Tomooka et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5790040 | Kreier et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| D399155 | Roberts | Oct 1998 | S |
| 5819124 | Somner et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832671 | White | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5850180 | Hess | Dec 1998 | A |
| D409936 | Baldwin et al. | May 1999 | S |
| 5936524 | Zhevelev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5980123 | Heifler | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6037902 | Pinhas et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049273 | Hess | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6188715 | Partyka | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6211522 | Kotlicki et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6271752 | Vaios | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285912 | Ellison et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292508 | Hong et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6411209 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6476858 | Ramirez Diaz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6504479 | Lemons et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6636738 | Hayashi | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| D485774 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
| 6686952 | Brazier | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690414 | Lyons et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6700487 | Lyons et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6759957 | Murakami et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6768294 | Moldavsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6768868 | Schnell | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6818881 | Chernichovski et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6819239 | Bingham | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6940405 | Script et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6965313 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6970183 | Monroe | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| D516445 | DiPasquale | Mar 2006 | S |
| 7079028 | Herrmann et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081817 | Zhevelev et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| D527296 | Concari et al. | Aug 2006 | S |
| 7106193 | Kovach | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7149422 | Schnell | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7151945 | Myles et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7463145 | Jentoft | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7463146 | Reibel et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7471334 | Stenger | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7619512 | Trundle et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7835343 | Reibel | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 8081073 | Reibel et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8155105 | Reibel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8248226 | Friar | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8259816 | Coleman, Sr. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8378988 | Artino | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8520068 | Naidoo et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 20010028798 | Manowitz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020067259 | Fufidio | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159770 | Moultrie | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020171557 | Wegener | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030065407 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030128130 | Kao | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030193563 | Suzuki | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202117 | Garner | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040086088 | Naidoo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109059 | Kawakita | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113778 | Script et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155781 | DeOme | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040190467 | Liu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205823 | Tsai | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205824 | Tsai | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040239497 | Schwartzman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050024206 | Samarasekera et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030180 | Pantus et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073580 | Takeda et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134450 | Kovach | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134454 | Eskildsen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200494 | Herrmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275549 | Barclay et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060204050 | Takizawa | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250501 | Widmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070018106 | Zhevelev et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036535 | Chee | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20080079561 | Trundle et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080174100 | Reeves | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080252412 | Larsson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259161 | Hellman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311878 | Martin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20100080548 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092764 | Chung et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289644 | Slavin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110183643 | Martin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20120001755 | Conrady | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120086767 | Lau et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120092163 | Hart | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314901 | Hanson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130148950 | Chang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140267716 | Child et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140267740 | Almomani | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150156031 | Fadell | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4423947 | Jan 1996 | DE |
| 10150745 | Apr 2003 | DE |
| 676733 | Oct 1995 | EP |
| 811959 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0856826 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0986038 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1115264 | Jul 2001 | EP |
| 1363260 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1499098 | Jan 2005 | EP |
| 1575009 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1316933 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| 2325548 | Nov 1998 | GB |
| 2358504 | Jul 2001 | GB |
| 2395336 | May 2004 | GB |
| 01236397 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 11154292 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 2003233889 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2005071064 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| WO8800747 | Jan 1988 | WO |
| WO9725696 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 0003367 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO0127763 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| 0246919 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2004064355 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2004079684 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2004114648 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO2005034060 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005065196 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Indoor MotionViewer DCV601, Datasheet [online]. RSI Video Technologies, 2220-IMVIS Mar. 2012 (Feb. 22, 2013). http//www.videofied.com.au/pdf/2013/installation. |
| “Indoor Motion Viewer DCV601” Datasheet [online]. RSI Video Technologies, Feb. 22, 2013, http://www.videofied.com.au/pdf/2013/Installation%20sheets%202013/DCV701%20Indoor%20Motionviewer%20install%20sheet.pdf pp. 1-4. |
| European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 15158810.0, 2 pp. (Jul. 17, 2015). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61857586 | Jul 2013 | US |
