This application is a U.S. National Stage of PCT/CA2014/050719, filed Jul. 30, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates generally to security documents having thermoplastic substrates with windows formed therein for displaying images, and, more particularly, to such a security document having a secured window that is resistant to tampering, and a method of making the same.
Security documents such as identification cards, passport's, driver's licenses, health cards, etc. typically include one or more printed images which are used to identify the cardholder or other entity associated with the security document. For example, a security document in the form of an identification card, a driver's license or personal identification sheet of a passport may have a thermoplastic substrate and bear a printed photograph of the person to whom the card, license or passport was issued (referred to as a personalization image) to identify and verify a person holding the security document. This photograph may, for example, be printed onto the thermoplastic substrate by means of laser marking, whereby a laser sensitive thermoplastic substrate is marked by applying a laser beam to it which causes it to discolour (i.e. mark), or by ink jet printing using an ultraviolet (UV) curable ink.
It is desirable that personalization images (i.e. images used to authenticate the identity of a cardholder) applied to security documents be resistant to tampering by forgers, such as by replacing an authentic, personalized image with a non-authentic image. Typically, security documents display such a personalized image within a transparent window formed in an opacified substrate of the document. To forge such a security document a forger may choose to alter such image by cutting out the window and replacing it with another displaying a different image. Consequently, there is a need to protect the window of a security document against fraudulent removal in order to protect against such tampering and improve security.
The present invention provides an improved security document having a “see-through” security feature that protects a transparent window in which personalization information may be displayed, such as an image of the authorized document holder. The “see-through” security feature is provided by a predetermined image, such as text (e.g. micro-text or encoded indicia), graphics or other image, that is marked onto the document substrate from a front side thereof through the window to a back side of the window. An embodiment of the invention illustrated and described herein uses laser marking, which marks the security document by discolouring a laser sensitive layer, to apply the image of the “see-through” feature to the security document. An alternative embodiment might, for example, use ink jet printing to apply the image. The image is applied in such a manner that it extends from the front to the back of document in the area of the transparent window, with front-to-back image elements in registration, such that an inspection of the security document window can verify whether an expected front-to-back (“see-through”) image is present in the window. For ease of reference, the registered front-to-back image is alternately described herein as a “see-through” security feature.
A “see-through” security feature according to the invention makes it difficult for a tamperer to fraudulently replace the window with another (such as by cutting out the original and attaching another) because it would be very difficult to produce the same registered front-to-back image in a fraudulent replacement window. This is because of the measurable precision of the registration of the front-to-back images and the fact that a suitable inspection of the security document would enable an inspector to verify, from the image in the window, whether or not such registration of the front to back images of an expected “see-through” security feature is present. For exemplary embodiments described herein, this can be done, for example, by illuminating the window from the back of the document which will cause both the front and back images to become visible in the window.
The present invention provides a security feature that is applied to a window of a security document comprising a first image on a first side of the security document in at least an area of the window and a second image on a second side of the security document in at least an area of the window, wherein at least a part of the first image and at least a part of the second image are in front-to-back registration in the areas of the window, the registration of the first and second images being capable of verification by suitable inspection of the window.
A security document (e.g. an identification card, a license and a sheet for a passport) comprising the foregoing security feature is also provided by the invention.
Further, the invention provides a method of securing a window of a security document. A predetermined first image is applied to a first side of the security document in at least an area of the window and a predetermined second image is applied to a second side of the security document in at least an area of the window whereby at least a part of the first image and at least a part of the second image are in front-to-back registration in the areas of the window, the registration of the first and second images being capable of verification by suitable inspection of the window.
The security document may comprise a thermoplastic substrate, and the first and second images may be laser marked on the thermoplastic substrate, with the first image extending from an opacified area of the security document into the area of the window.
Optionally, the first and second images may together have an appearance of a composite image in the window, the first and second images being partial images of the composite image when joined together and the front-to-back registration of the partial images is at the juncture forming the composite image. Another option is for at least a part of the first and second images to provide an appearance in the window of a single image whereby at least a part of the first and second images are identical and the front-to-back registration of the images is at least at those identical parts (e.g. the first and second images comprise different Guilloche patterns). Further, the first and second images comprise micro-text personalized for the holder of the security document and said inspection includes using magnification means.
According to the method, the first and second images may be laser marked onto a targeted location of the substrate relative to the window using a vision input system configured so that only the data captured from the first side of the document is used to mark both the first and second images, and any offset angle captured by the vision input system is ignored.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the following drawings drawn to facilitate illustration of features described herein and not to scale.
The invention provides a security feature for securing a window of a security document. The security document includes a window in which predetermined images are applied in a front-to-back manner in the area of the window such that at least a part of the image applied to the front of the window and at least a part of the image applied to the back of the window are in front-to-back registration. A suitable inspection of the image appearing in the security document window can verify whether an expected security feature is present (i.e. indicating that the security document is authentic). The term registration used herein is as normally used and understood in the printing industry to refer to precision alignment and placement.
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention an identification card 10, as illustrated in
A Mühlbauer laser engraver, SCP 5600, having a mechanical swivel system to turn the card 10 around with minimal or no X, Y and Phi movement, is used to apply a “see-through” feature, comprising a front-to-back image 50, of the embodiment illustrated in
In testing, to investigate the capability of the laser engraver, an original image depicting a stylized “Card Test 01/01/1970 Card Test 01/01/” (shown at the center of
Referring to
It was found that the quality of the laser marked image was improved by modifying the cropped half images so as to prevent excessive burning at the juncture where the two images meet due to suboptimal first pulse suppression and/or overlapping. For example, with reference to
The front-to-back registration of the “see-through” image 50 was initially tested without using a vision input system for the laser engraver and registration of the front-to-back images was successfully achieved. However, for purposes of uniformity in card production, when desired for a particular applications, a vision input system may be desired to control the position of the laser marking relative to the window 30 of each card 10. This is because, typically, the exact position of the window 30 will vary from card to card and this will result in variation of the position of the laser marking relative to the window 30. A vision input system, such as that provided by Mühlbauer for use with its laser engraver machine, is designed to enable the user to control the position of the laser marking relative to the window 30.
To align the data to the window 30 of a card 10, the vision input system located on the laser-engraver separately determines an offset of the window 30 for both the front and the back of each card 10. The offset data parameters produced by the vision input system are captured and used by software controlling the vision input system to compensate for the variation in the position of the window.
In a normal situation, a set of data captured on the front side of the card 10 is used to determine the positioning of the laser marking on the front side and a set of data captured on the back side of the card 10 is used for marking the back side. However, for the present application, it was found that using both sets of data resulted in too much overlap between the two (front and back) cropped images, as large as 1 mm, due to variability in the capturing of data and calculations performed by the vision input system. To minimize the overlap, only one offset value (X, Y and Phi) is used for both sides, namely, the data set captured on the front side since it is the first side to be laser marked. In the result, this achieved the desired front-to-back registration for the “see-through” security feature.
It was also found that only the use of X and Y offset values are needed to compensate for the variation in position of the window 30 from card to card. When an angle (Phi) was added to the compensation calculation a slight tilt of the “see-through” image, and excessive (visible) overlapping (namely, darker marking and/or open space at the overlap, depending on the extent of the variation between card window positions) and the character deformation, resulted. To avoid this, the angle offset data collected by the vision input system was ignored in calculating a correction for positioning the “see-through” security feature. Also, only the information collected from the front of the card was used by the vision input system to laser mark both the front and back images of the “see-through” feature.
The “see-through” image of the security feature can be formed from an image that is cropped into two pieces, with each half image marked on either side of the card window in registration at the cropped edge (i.e. the juncture between the two half images) in such a manner that the half images appear to be a continuous image when the window is viewed, as described above and illustrated by
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2014/050719 | 7/30/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/015130 | 2/4/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6089614 | Howland | Jul 2000 | A |
8141908 | Whiteman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8226125 | Williams | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8573650 | Gregarek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20030015866 | Cioffi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030193184 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20080143095 | Isherwood | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100295290 | Muth | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0388090 | Sep 1990 | EP |
Entry |
---|
SCP5600 (2007) http://www.labelsandlabeling.com/news/latest/muehlbauer-systems-personalize-portuguese-identity-cards. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170217243 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |