This invention relates to a security document incorporating an image used to determine the authenticity of the document.
Security documents incorporate a variety of features to prevent the documents being forged and to assist with determining their authenticity. Some of these features are designed to be visible under synthetic radiation, such as ultraviolet radiation, and in particular units that emit ultraviolet radiation are used for checking banknotes. Many of the existing security features are well known and there is a continual need to adopt new features to ensure that the properties of authentic banknotes cannot be duplicated or simulated in a way that prevents authentication of genuine banknotes. Ideally any new features need to be assessable using existing detection equipment. It is an aim of the present invention to provide a new security feature used on security documents.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a security document bearing an image associated with an active substance, wherein the active substance is responsive to pressure to temporarily alter the appearance of the image when viewed under synthetic radiation, such as ultraviolet radiation. Thus the document when viewed initially depicts the image with a first appearance, and when pressure is applied, the image changes to a second appearance, the image reverting to the first appearance once the pressure is removed. This gives a readily visible change to the image when pressure is applied which allows the user to determine the authenticity of the security document.
Preferably the change in appearance lasts for 5 minutes to 0.1 seconds after the pressure is removed, and more preferably lasts 60 seconds to 1 second. A fast reversible change is desirable so that documents quickly revert to their normal appearance once authenticity has been determined.
Desirably the active substance emits radiation and the emitted radiation may change wavelength as pressure is applied so as to alter the appearance of the image. Emission of radiation is in response to the substance preferably having a broad strong absorption peak in the ultraviolet UV region and a high extinction coefficient in the ultraviolet, typically around 365 nm and particularly over the uva and uvb where uva has a frequency range of 400-315 nm and uvb has a frequency range of 280-315 nm.
Typically the synthetic radiation is ultraviolet radiation, preferably emitted by a broad spectrum UV lamp with a strong emission peak around 365 nm. Devices emitting ultraviolet radiation are already used to identify other features on security documents and by causing changes in the image to occur when illuminated under ultraviolet radiation, authenticity can be determined.
Preferably the active substance is responsive to pressure in the range 0.01-10 MPa, more preferably 0.1-1.0 MPa, which is equivalent to the pressure applied by a human digit, such as a finger or thumb. Typically this tactile pressure will be generated by pressing or rubbing the image on a security document with a finger or thumb.
Desirably the response of the active substance is completely reversible with the image reverting to its first appearance once pressure is removed. This allows pressure to be applied to determine authenticity as many times as needed over the life of a security document.
The active substance may be incorporated in an ink forming at least part of the image.
The active substance may be incorporated in a substrate, such as paper, polymer, or hybrid substrate of both paper and polymer or be associated with a plurality of communicating layers.
Preferably the active substance is dispersed in a polymer, thixotropic material or adhesive.
The active substance may be incorporated in fibres, strands, embedded thread, windowed thread, or tape within a substrate, such as paper, forming part of the document of value.
The active substance may be incorporated in a patch applied to a substrate.
If desired, a compressible layer may be associated with the active substance, the active substance responsive to compression of the layer to alter the appearance of the image.
The compressible layer may be a patch encapsulating a flowable substance, such as a gel, incorporating an ultraviolet absorber.
The active substance may be associated with one, two, three or more communicating layers disposed above a substrate.
The layer or layers may incorporate a UV filter capable of being rendered inoperative in response to pressure. This allows UV radiation to be blocked and prevented from irradiating an active substance until pressure is applied.
The active substance may comprise at least one of the following: an organic or inorganic dye or dyes, or pigments, chromophore(s), multi-chromophore(s), lumiphore(s).
The active substance may be able to form excimers and be responsive to pressure to alter the number of excimers, and so alter the emission characteristics of the substance.
The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Document of value 10 in
A variety of different active substances with different properties can be used and can be placed on or incorporated into the document of value in a number of different ways to produce a temporary visual change as pressure is applied. The image can be achieved by a pattern which extends across the whole of the document of value, or be in a specific area as shown in
The image can be visible or invisible initially as long as it changes appearance when pressure is applied. Protective layers or coatings are associated with the responsive material wherever this is necessary to maintain the characteristics of the active substance.
In the embodiment shown in
The change in emission spectrum upon removal of pressure is reversible indefinitely.
With dyes suitable for use in the invention, the wavelength of light emitted under ultraviolet radiation is generally well separated from the wavelength emitted when the ratio of excimers is changed. As such the colour change can be selected over a fairly large range, dependent on the dye or combination of dyes used to give a distinct visual colour change. The eye is particularly sensitive to red and green, so for example an initial monomer response showing green radiation is selected, with the excimer emitting in the lower energy red part of the spectrum.
Alternatively a dye may be selected that emits in the non-visible range, with visible luminescence under ultraviolet radiation induced with the application of pressure.
In another preferred embodiment, the active substance such as a luminescent dye is dispersed in a thixotropic material before being applied to the document of value as shown in
Another embodiment uses a fluorescent dye dispersed within a material where the fluorescence is switched on/off by the presence of an acid. This is achieved by an acid group being encapsulated in a reverse micelle structure. Under normal conditions the acid is contained within the reverse micelle group and does not affect the luminescent dye, such that the luminescence is visible under ultraviolet radiation. When pressure is applied to the document of value over the area where luminescence occurs, this disrupts the micelle structure. The disrupted micelle releases the acid which protonates the dye to switch off the luminescence. The system is designed such that once the pressure is removed, the protons of the acids are reabsorbed by the reformed reversible micelle structure, with luminescence then switching back on. A similar principle can be employed to release an alternative luminescence quencher.
Examples 2, 3 and 4 show square patches 23 made of two or more polymer layers or resiliently compressible sheets 24, 24′ which can, if desired, be separated by a compressible layer 26. The two layers contain active substances that are mutually influential when in close contact. For example, the two layers 24, 24′ can contain respective chromophores or multi-chromophores that have good spectral overlap and undergo energy transfer when in close contact so as to alter the emission spectrum at the deformation site where pressure is applied. Pressure causes energy transfer that results in emission of a different wavelength. Certain active substances will change their emission radiation as the matrix they are embedded within stretches as the pressure is applied.
The patches 23 can be of any shape or design, and can be adhered to or incorporated in the banknote substrate or paper. The patch 23 is visible as one image or colour 16 under ultraviolet light 14, changing to another image or colour 16′ as pressure is applied.
The chromophore used can be a transition or lanthanide metal complex, or an organic substance, or an organic substance incorporating a transition or lanthanide metal complex. The chromophores are typically supported in a polymer, co-polymer or other suitable matrix or ink vehicle, either by being dispersed, directly embedded or covalently attached to a polymer layer.
Alternatively one layer in the patch can incorporate an efficient quencher, such that luminescence is extinguished or reduced when pressure is applied, see
In another embodiment, change in appearance with pressure is achieved using liquid crystalline materials. A fluorescent molecule highly susceptible to excimer formation, such as a covalently-linked dimer, is dispersed in a liquid crystalline phase or corrugated polymer which is applied to or incorporated in a document of value. Under ultraviolet radiation, fluorescence will occur from the monomer form with the molecules residing in the grooves in an ordered way with the interacting species kept apart. When pressure is applied to the document of value over the fluorescent region, the alignment of the liquid crystals is temporarily disrupted and the ratio of the excimer formation will change, such that the visual fluorescence properties will change.
Lumiphores can also be used as the active substance with the luminescent properties changing dependent on the polarity of the polymer in which the lumiphore is dispersed. Application of pressure can be used to change the polarity of the material within which the lumiphore is dispersed, and so change the polarity of the lumiphore and alter the radiation emission characteristics. Piezoelectric polymers can be used in a similar way.
Another embodiment relying on pressure to alter the emitted radiation is shown in
One specific way of achieving the embodiment described in
If required, the flexible polymer coating which incorporates the UV filter can also incorporate a lumiphore, such that the first lumiphore coating, which of course may also be incorporated within the document of value by being placed within printing ink and the like, is overlain by a second lumiphore incorporated in a layer which also has a UV filter and is flexible. Under UV irradiation, the document of value will have visible characteristics at least in part dependent on the luminescence of the second lumiphore whose luminescence is not blocked by the UV filter within the same layer. UV irradiation of the first lumiphore beneath this layer will be blocked by the UV filter. As pressure is applied under UV irradiation, the flexible layer will thin in and around the region where pressure is applied, allowing UV radiation to reach the first lumiphore which then emits radiation in combination with the second lumiphore. The resulting appearance of the document of value will then be dependent on the luminescent properties of both lumiphores. If desired, the UV filter and lumiphore in the second coating can be the same substance, i.e. a lumiphore which is also a UV filter.
A similar effect to the embodiment of
Examples of preferred UV absorbers are as follows:
Riboflavin
Coumarin 30
9,10-diphenylanthracene
Anthracene
1,6-diphenylhexatriene
Auramine O
Vitamin B12
Coumarin 1
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
Piroxicam
POPOP
Quinine sulphate
1,4-diphenylbutadiene
Azobenzene
Hematin
Bacteriochlorophyll a
Avobenzone(Butyl Methoxy dibenzoyl methane)
Benzophenone-9
3-Benzylidenebornan-2-one
Cinoxate(2-Ethoxyethyl p-methoxycinnamate)
1-p-Cumenyl-3-phenylpropoane-1,3-dione
Digalloyl trioleate
Dihydroxyacetone
2,5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde
Dioxybenzone(Benzophenone-3)
Ensulizole
2-Ethyl 4-bis(hydroxypropyl)aminobenzoate
2-Ethylhexyl 2-cyano-3,3-diphenylacrylate
Glyceryl aminobenzoate
Homosalate(Homomethyl salicylate)
3-(Imidazol-4-yl)acrylic acid and its ethyl ester
Isopentenyl-4-methoxycinnamate
4-Isopropylbenzyl salicylate
Lawsome with dihydroxyacetate
Menthyl anthranilate(Meradimate)
4-Methylbenzylidene camphor
4-dimenthylaminobenzaldehyde
1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene
Mexenone
Mexoryl XL
N,N,N-trimethyl-4-(2-oxoborn-3-ylidenemethyl)anilinium methyl sulphate
Neo Heliopan AP
Octocrylene
Octyl methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate, Ethylhexyl p-methoxycinnamate)
Octyl saicylate(2-Ethylhexyl salicylate)
Alpha-(2-oxoborn-3-ylidene)toluene-4-sulfonic acid
Oxybenzone
Padimate A
Padimate O
p-Aminobenzoic acid
Sulisobenzone
Tinosorb M
Tinosorb S
Titanium dioxide
Trolamine salicylate
UVasorb HEB
UVinul A Plus
UVinul T150
Zinc oxide
These substances are absorbers of ultraviolet radiation, generally with a large extinction coefficient in the ultraviolet range. Particularly preferred is 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde with λmax of 342 nm and an extinction coefficient of 29,800 M−1 cm−1 and 2.5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde with λmax of 363 nm.
In a similar manner to
Where layers are added to the document of value, for example protective layers or layers containing filters and the like, the overall thickness of the document with all layers should not exceed 1 to 150 microns, and more preferably be in the range 80 to 120 microns.
In all the above examples, the alterations in appearance only occur with application of pressure and are completely reversible such that removal of pressure results in the active substances reverting to their initial state from their altered state.
The above embodiments of the invention provide a banknote security feature that is used to distinguish visually between genuine and counterfeit banknotes and depending on the properties of the active substance is detectable with the existing ultraviolet lamps which emit ultraviolet over a broad spectrum, with strong emission at 365 nm.
Typically, the image change seen for all embodiments of the invention will fall within the visible range 400-700 nm and be stimulated in response to UV radiation. The image can change from colourless to visible, or from visible to colourless, or change in colour by alterations in the wavelength emitted. Where the active substance changes its emission from one visible wavelength to another visible wavelength, colour shifts of, for example blue and on pressure to red, green on pressure to red, yellow on pressure to red, or in reverse alternative combinations may be used. Depending on the embodiment concerned, initial images may be red, yellow, green or blue and then switch to colourless. Alternatively the reverse may be seen, for example the image changing from colourless on pressure to be red, yellow, green or blue.
Specific implementations of the embodiment described generally in relation to
To prepare a pressure-responsive feature for use on a document of value, a coating containing a lumiphore excited by radiation of around 365 nm was applied to a PET film and coated with a flexible polymer incorporating a UV absorber or blocker. The chosen polymer was poly(urethane) which was synthesised in the following way using a pre-cursor diol.
Firstly poly(caprolactone)diol was synthesised by adding a mixture of caprolactone (1 mole, 114.0 g) and butanediol (0.11 mole, 10.0 g) to a two necked round bottom flask fitted with a condenser. The mixture was heated at 130° C. overnight under a nitrogen atmosphere in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate as a catalyst. This produced poly(caprolactone)diol as a solid at room temperature with a molecular weight of 1200 gmol−1, determined by size exclusion chromatography in Tetrahydrofuran (THF). The poly(caprolactone)diol (30.01 g, 70% of the total) was then added to a pre-heated reactor equipped with mechanical stirrer at 90° C. under nitrogen atmosphere. The reactor was allowed to heat at the same temperature for 30 minutes and then the temperature reduced to 40° C. 2 to 3 drops of dibutyltin dilaurate as a catalyst and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) (10.78 g) were added respectively. The reaction temperature was maintained at 50° C. to avoid gel formation and stirred for 90 minutes. Then a solvent mixture (Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and methylisobutylketone (MIBK) in the ratio 1:2, (DMSO=6.81 g and MIBK=13.59 g; 50% of the total) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 50° C. for another hour and then samples were collected for titration. The moles of free NCO left in the whole reaction mixture were calculated by titration using 1N HCl in methanol and 1N dibutyl amine in toluene.
This achieved synthesis of poly(urethane) via step growth polymerisation according to the following equation where:
Where Md=molar mass of diol, Ms=mass of soft segment (PCL) and Mn=number average molecular weight of polycaprolactone (PCL).
Soft segment, PCL=70%=30.01 g
Using above equation, Wi(IPDI)=10.75 g
(Moles of NCO=0.0967, Moles of OH=0.05)
A stoichiometric quantity of 1,4-butane diol was added to the reaction mixture to react with all remaining NCO groups and the reaction mixture was allowed to heat at 50° C. for two hours. Another set of samples was collected and titrated following the procedure described above. The amount of free NCO should then be 0. The reaction mixture was allowed to heat at the same temperature for another hour, leaving crude poly(urethane). Around 10 g of crude poly(urethane) was taken and washed with methanol 10-15 times and then immersed in isopropyl alcohol for 24 hours. Poly(urethane) was dried at 40° C. under vacuum oven and pure poly(urethane) obtained.
Following manufacture of the pure poly(urethane)polymer, a lumiphore coating solution and a polymer/UV absorber coating solution were prepared. The first coating solution of the lumiphore was obtained by mixing 2.5 g of 20% poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) solution in dichloromethane (DCM) (w/w) with 0.5 ml of lumiphore solution (38 mg/cm3 of lumiphore in DCM). Typically the lumiphore was selected to exhibit green radiation under UV irradiation, although lumiphores emitting radiation corresponding to other colours can be chosen. The second polymer/UV absorber coating solution was obtained by mixing 0.5 g of 20% poly(urethane) solution in DCM (w/w) with 1 ml of benzophenone solution (250 mg/cm3 in DCM), benzophenone being a UV filter or blocker.
The two coatings were then applied to a PET film so as to confirm that the coatings acted in accordance with the present invention. Coatings applied to such a PET film can either be applied to a document of value direct or else to the PET film with the combination of PET film and 2 coatings forming a patch which is then applied to a document of value.
The PET film was firstly coated with the first coating solution using hand coaters, also known as K bars, to give a wet film thickness of 4 μm and then allowed to dry. The coated PET film was then coated with the second UV absorber coating using a hand coater to give a wet film thickness of 50 μm. The coated PET film was allowed to dry at room temperature, such that the PET film then had a first coating containing the total coating lumiphore and a second flexible coating containing the UV blocker, the overall thickness being around 10 μm. Under UV irradiation with no pressure applied, no fluorescence could be observed.
After application of finger pressure under UV irradiation, fluorescence from the first coating was seen. This was because the second coating had thinned around the region where pressure was applied to a thickness of between 8 to 0.5 μm and as the finger was removed, the thinned region of the second coating no longer blocked all UV from reaching the lumiphore layer. The emission from the lumiphore layer could thus be seen in the region where pressure had been applied. After removal of tactile pressure, the flexible second coating gradually relaxed back to an even thickness, then blocking all UV radiation from reaching the first coating and so switching off fluorescence.
Thus by selecting an appropriate UV blocker and combining it with a flexible polymer, a lumiphore can be coated with a layer which flexes and thins sufficiently on application of finger pressure to allow UV light to reach the lumiphore and so allow the lumiphore to alter its visible characteristics. If required, additional softeners are added to the polymer to ensure it retains its flexibility over prolonged periods of time, typically the lifetime of a document of value.
A number of substituted benzaldehydes were found to filter out UV radiation around 365 nm and so act as UV filters or blockers. 2,5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde has an absorption maximum of 363 nm in methanol (MeOH) and is a cross-linking reagent for the poly(urethane) prepolymer due to the presence of two hydroxy groups. The covalent attachment of the UV filter to the polymer prevents possible migration of the UV filter from the polymer.
In this second example, poly(urethane) was synthesised by heating poly(caprolactone diol) (M.N. 2000, 8 g) to 80° C. and degassed under vacuum. Following cooling to room temperature, dibutyltin dilaureate (4 drops) and THF (dry, 20 cm3) were added. Isophorone diisocyanate (3.2 g, 14.4 mmol) was added dropwise via a pressure-equalising dropping funnel. The reaction was heated to 60° C. and 2,5-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (3 g, 21.7 mmol) was added and left to stir at this temperature overnight. Diisooctylphthalate (5 cm3) was added and left to react for a further 2 hours. The reaction was cooled to room temperature and THF was removed in vacuo. The polymer was washed with MeOH and propylalcohol (iPrOH) to give a pale green gelatinous polymer. Thus preparation of the poly(urethane) in the presence of diissooctylphthalate was found to result in a soft gelatinous material, following end-capping with the substituted benzaldehyde.
This polycaprolactone-based polymer (250 mg) was mixed thoroughly with a Gel Cast Shore Hardness 5 poly(urethane) to give a polymer mixture with an integral UV filter.
A lumiphore coating was prepared by dissolving lumiphore (2g) in THF (8 cm3) and mixed with 10 g of 10% w/w PMMA in dichloroethane so as to give a first coating in the form of a fluorophore-polymer mixture. As with example 1, typically a lumiphore is chosen which emits in the green part of the visible spectrum under UV irradiation, although other lumiphores can be used.
The lumiphore coating was applied to optically dull paper and left to dry overnight. The polymer mixture was then applied to the paper, and over the lumiphore coating, using a hand coater and allowed to set for 1 hour. Under UV irradiation, the resulting bilayer system could be compressed using finger pressure to reveal the fluorescence from the layer beneath. The poly(urethane) layer relaxed back within a few minutes after removal of pressure to prevent fluorescence.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0918939.0 | Oct 2009 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2010/051800 | 10/27/2010 | WO | 00 | 6/20/2012 |