Not applicable.
Not applicable.
This relates to security documents, and more particularly to an arrangement for making more difficult the nefarious alteration of security documents printed with a thermal printer. Thermal printers are useful for a wide variety of applications, including printing receipts and credit slips that may later be exchanged for cash. For example, an automated coin counting machine, typically located in a supermarket, issues a thermally printed receipt when a quantity of coins is poured into the machine and counted. The receipt is then taken to a cashier where the bearer will receive the printed amount in paper currency. Clearly, fraudulent alteration of the receipt could result in a significant loss for the supermarket.
A common approach to altering documents printed with a thermal printer is to wash the documents in a solvent that dissolves the heat activated coating with the thermally printed indicia, leaving a clean form document. After the washing process, the documents may be dried and then printed with altered information. Because of the wide use of thermal printers, it is desired to provide thermally printed documents that are not easily altered.
A security document may include a substrate and an imaging thermal coating on at least a portion of the surface of the substrate for thermal printing on the security document. A warning message is printed on the substrate in a substantially insoluble ink, and an obscuring coating on the substrate covers the warning message such that the warning message is not apparent. The obscuring coating is readily removable from the substrate when the document is subjected to washing with a solvent to remove thermal printed images. As a result, an attempt to alter the security document is made apparent.
The substrate may be a paper material, or a film material. The obscuring coating may be an activated thermal coating. The obscuring coating may comprise a thermal coating which has not been activated, whereby the presence of the obscuring coating on the substrate may be tested by the application of heat, as by scratching or rubbing the obscuring coating, and by observing a resultant color change in the obscuring coating. The obscuring coating may comprise a thermal coating having a color prior to activation that is substantially the same as the color of the substantially insoluble ink. The warning message printed on the substrate in a substantially insoluble ink may comprise a written warning. The substrate in a substantially insoluble ink may comprise a graphic warning. The obscuring coating may comprise a thermal coating which has been activated.
A security document may include a substrate, and an imaging thermal coating on at least a portion of the surface of the substrate for thermal printing on the security document. The imaging thermal coating is soluble in one or more solvents. A warning message is printed on the substrate in an ink which is substantially insoluble in the one or more solvents. An obscuring coating is provided on the substrate covering the warning message such that the warning message is not apparent to an observer. The obscuring coating is soluble in the one or more solvents, such that the obscuring coating is removed from the substrate if the document is subjected to washing with the one or more solvents to remove printed images on the imaging thermal coating. As a result, an attempt to alter the security document by washing the security document with the one or more solvents is made apparent.
The substrate may comprise a paper material, or a film material. The obscuring coating may comprise an activated thermal coating. The obscuring coating may comprise a thermal coating which has not been activated, whereby the presence of the obscuring coating on the substrate may be tested by the application of heat, as by manually scratching or rubbing the obscuring coating, and by observing a resultant color change in the obscuring coating. The obscuring coating may comprise a thermal coating having a color prior to activation that is substantially the same as the color of the substantially insoluble ink. The warning message printed on the substrate in a substantially insoluble ink may comprise a written warning, or a graphic warning. The obscuring coating may comprise a thermal coating which has been activated.
This relates to thermal printed security documents and, more specifically, to thermal printed documents which are difficult to alter. Thermal printed documents typically have a coating on the document substrate. The coating responds to heat from the print head of a thermal printer to change color and provide printed indicia and graphics. Thermal coatings commonly have three components, a color former, which is typically a colorless dye, a color developer, and a sensitizer. These may be solid materials that are ground to fine particles and into a coating formulation along with any optional additives such as pigments, binders and lubricants. This coating formulation is then applied to the surface of the document substrate, which may commonly be a paper or film material, and dried. The indicia and graphic images are then formed when portions of the coating change color when heat causes the components to melt and interact. In some coating formulations, the components may be encapsulated in microcapsules which rupture or are permeable when exposed to heat from the printer.
In the past, someone wishing to alter a thermal printed security document would wash the document in an appropriate solvent to remove the coating, including the portions of the coating which were changed in color by the thermal printer. The resulting blank document would then be reprinted, using some other printing technique, producing an altered security document that appeared genuine.
The security document 10 shown in
The warning message 16 is shown as being printed on top of the thermal coating 14, and this is satisfactory, provided that the ink in which the warning message 16 is printed permeates the coating 14 and the top of the substrate 12. It will be appreciated that if the ink of the printed warning message 16 were to be separated physically from the substrate 12, washing away the coating 14 might result in removing the warning message from the document as well, even though the ink in which the warning message is printed is not soluble in the solvent. As an alternative, the warning message 16 may be printed on the surface of the substrate 12 before the thermal coating 14 is applied to the substrate 12. This will insure that the ink of the warning message 16 sufficiently permeates and stains the substrate 12 that the removal of the thermal coating 14 does not also remove the warning message.
The obscuring coating 18 may be an activated thermal coating, and may simply be an additional layer of the same coating material as is used for coating 14. This will insure, of course, that any solvent used to was the document that removes the imaging thermal coating 14 will also remove the obscuring coating 18. The coating 18 may be activated before it is coated onto the document 10. It will be appreciated, however, that the obscuring coating 18 may differ from the coating used for coating 14 as long as the coatings 14 and 18 are soluble in the same solvents. For example, a different thermal coating which is opaque prior to activation may be used in its inactive form to coating an obscure the warning message. Such an opaque coating may be warmed by rubbing or scratching, changing the color of the coating and providing a means of testing for the presence of the obscuring coating 18 and increasing the confidence of the holder that the security document has not been altered by washing. To obscure the warning message 16 effectively, the obscuring coating 18 may comprise a thermal coating having a color prior to activation that is substantially the same as the color of the substantially insoluble ink making up the warning message 16. The warning message 16 printed on the substrate 12 in a substantially insoluble ink may comprise a written warning, a graphic warning, or both.
Reference is now made to the embodiment of the security document 20 shown in
It will be appreciated that although the coatings, substrate, and ink in
The obscuring coating may be any of a number of coating materials that obscure the warning message from view, that are washed away by a solvent when the document image is removed by the solvent, and that offer additional security features not provided by conventional inks that a forger might use to obscure the warning message after washing. The termochromic ink coating shown in
It should be appreciated that the document image that is protected, although described above in respect to a thermally printed image, may also be an image printed with ink in a different manner, such as for example an image printed with an ink jet printer. In any event, however, the protected image is defined by an imaging coating, such as an ink jet ink, which is soluble in essentially the same solvents as the obscuring coating on the substrate, covering the warning message. As a consequence, an attempt to wash away the protected image will also wash away the obscuring coating, alerting an observer to the alteration of the document image.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3802724 | Gosnell | Apr 1974 | A |
4407443 | McCorkle | Oct 1983 | A |
4488646 | McCorkle | Dec 1984 | A |
4726608 | Walton | Feb 1988 | A |
4837061 | Smits et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5209515 | Dotson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5547916 | Morrison | Aug 1996 | A |
5618063 | Chang et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644352 | Chang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5720801 | Nadan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5873604 | Phillips | Feb 1999 | A |
6394358 | Thaxton et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6616190 | Jotcham | Sep 2003 | B1 |
D619359 | Pascua et al. | Jul 2010 | S |
7892639 | Mess et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8622436 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20030124436 | Shioda et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050258634 | Dronzek, Jr. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070029785 | Fedrigoni | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070210572 | Halbrook et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090286032 | Franklin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20120104743 | Mehta et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120274059 | Moronuki et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140070525 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |