The invention herein pertains to window locks and the like and particularly pertains to a sash type window lock having a slideable cam for engaging a keeper.
In recent years burglars have become adapt at opening sash type windows from the outside of a house or other building by first removing the window screen and placing a putty knife or similar thin bladed instrument between the sashes to rotate the cam to an unlocked posture. The blade is used by unauthorized persons to urge the rotatable cam to disengage the cam from the keeper. Once the cam has been disengaged the sash is then openable for entry purposes. Attempts have been made to secure such windows such as by use of extra locks or by drilling holes in the sash and window frame and inserting nails or steel rods therein for immobilization. However adding locking devices tends to inconvenience the home or business owner and obstructs the intended function of the window. Certain sash window locks have been designed in the past to prevent unauthorized entry such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,142,541.
Window reinforcements, locks and other means to prevent entry are often expensive, inconvenient and are often difficult to use and require extra thought, time and effort by the owner. Sometimes the additions are forgotten and when forgotten, the original locks provide little if any protection against unauthorized entry.
Based on the problems and disadvantages associated with conventional sash type window locks and locking systems, the present invention was conceived and one of its objectives is to provide a sash type window lock which can be mounted on the top rail of the sash for engagement with a keeper mounted on an opposing bottom sash rail when the window is closed.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a sash type window lock which is handle-operated as a conventional lock yet which provides added security.
It is still another objective of the present invention to provide a sash type window lock which includes a tab contained within a rotatable cam which urges or slides the cam in a lateral direction to engage the cam against a locking stud on the cam housing.
It is yet another objective of the present invention to provide a sash type window lock having a groove in the housing for containing a cam guide to direct the cam in its final locking movement in a short lateral direction.
Various other objectives and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art as a more detailed description is set forth below.
The aforesaid and other objectives are realized by providing a lock formed from a plastic composite material, or a metal such as zinc, aluminum or other suitable materials. The preferred form of the lock includes a handle, housing, cam and keeper formed form a standard zinc die-cast material having added security for use on sash type windows and the like. The lock includes a housing with an indent which contains an elongated, rotatable slideable cam. Along the inside top of the indent is a question mark-like (“?”) groove which allows a guide affixed to the cam to direct the cam in a generally circular direction and lastly to guide the cam in a short, lateral direction to lock the cam against the housing wall. The elongated cam allows the keeper catch to be engaged while allowing the sashes to move laterally to each other. This will accommodate for a slightly misaligned keeper. A handle is joined to an axle which passes through the top of the housing as conventional. The elongated cam is positioned on the axle and includes an elongated axle port and defines a tab well having dual lobes. The axle will rotate the cam and tab and will slide the cam. As the cam rotates, the terminal end of the housing groove prevents further circular rotation. As conventional, rotation of the cam causes the cam channel to engulf a keeper catch positioned on an opposing window frame or sash. Once the cam's circular rotation stops, additional turning of the handle in the same direction causes the tab to turn a few degrees which forces the cam to move laterally and into engagement with a locking stud on the interior indent wall. A locking notch on the cam receives the locking stud for security.
With the cam engaging the locking stud, pressure along the outer surface of the cam such as with a knife or other blade by an unauthorized person will not rotate the cam. Thus the window cannot be unlocked by such contact as in conventional sash locks. As would be understood, rotation of the cam during locking causes the sweep arm channel to engulf the keeper catch positioned on an opposing window frame or sash as typical.
To unlock the window the handle is merely turned in an opposite direction which disengages the cam from the locking stud and upon further rotation first disengages the cam notch from the locking stud, then the sweep arm channel from the keeper catch so the window can be opened or moved relative to the opposing window sash or frame.
For a better understanding of the invention and its operation, turning now to the drawings,
Housing 23 as seen in
The preferred method of locking window sash lock 20 is seen in various steps in
In
Upon further counterclockwise rotation as shown in
Now, additional security is provided and upon further counterclockwise rotation of handle 21 as shown in
Handle 21, housing 23 and keeper 40 can be manufactured from a variety of conventional materials, designer colors and coatings. A soft or resilient polymeric foam or other coating can be applied as an overmolding to the structural material of handle 21, housing 23 and keeper 40 for safety purposes such as to protect a child that strikes the components in an accidental fall.
The illustrations and examples provided herein are for explanatory purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
192614 | Andrews | Jul 1877 | A |
253534 | Howard | Feb 1882 | A |
314350 | Smith | Mar 1885 | A |
369885 | Shaw | Sep 1887 | A |
375656 | Shaw | Dec 1887 | A |
520754 | Burmeister | May 1894 | A |
528656 | Burmeister | Nov 1894 | A |
539030 | Bitner | May 1895 | A |
2997323 | Riser | Aug 1961 | A |
4261602 | Anderson | Apr 1981 | A |
5161839 | Piltingsrud et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5219193 | Piltingsrud | Jun 1993 | A |
5452925 | Huang | Sep 1995 | A |
5741032 | Chaput | Apr 1998 | A |
6068306 | Brautigam | May 2000 | A |
6142541 | Rotondi | Nov 2000 | A |
6568723 | Murphy et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6601270 | Eckhardt et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6871886 | Coleman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7000957 | Lawrence | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7063361 | Lawrence | Jun 2006 | B1 |
20040262929 | Trickel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060087130 | Liang | Apr 2006 | A1 |