This application is the United States National Phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/061394, filed Jun. 2, 2014, which claims the benefit of priority of and is related to European Union Application No. EM 002363317, filed Dec. 2, 2013. The contents of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/061394 and European Union Application No. EM 002363317 are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
The present invention relates to a security seal for a medical container, in particular a sterilization container or sterile container, comprising a seal foot having at least one latch structure movable relative thereto for engaging a mating latch structure formed on the container, and a seal head formed on the container or on a container closure and connected with the seal foot that comprises at least one locking tab which is movably connected with the seal head through a hinge element.
In the prior art, seals are used inter alia for the securing of closures. A simple and widely used example is represented by wire loops whose ends are connected with a sealing element, so that opening the seal without destroying the wire loop or seal is not possible. In the field of medical science, seals are used for instance with sterile containers in order to be able to check if such a sterile container has already been opened once after the sterilization and if instruments contained therein are still sterile. Various types of seals are known for this.
A very simple, known seal for sterile containers works according to the principle of a cable tie, i.e. a loop made of plastics, which is put through eyes provided on a container lid and a container trough and then closed. A proximal end of the seal is provided with indentations whose flanks pointing toward the proximal end are slanted, while the flanks pointing toward the distal end are set with a steep angle. The other, distal end of the seal is provided with a head having a through-hole into which an elastic latching nose projects. The seal is closed by inserting its proximal end into the through-hole such that the latching nose latches in place in one of the indentations. Due to the steep flank angle and a corresponding configuration of the latching nose, it is easy to insert the proximal end of the seal into the through-hole, but pulling it out in the reverse direction is not possible. The seal may be provided with labeling fields or the like.
Such a seal can only be opened by destroying it, i.e. by severing it at a certain position. The problem is that they are not protected from willful manipulations. A thin object could be pushed into the head of the seal, deforming the flexible latching nose against the spring action and opening the seal without destroying it. Thereafter, it could even be reused, so that it is not able to fulfil its function of ensuring the original state. In the clinic field, there is the further problem that a properly opened seal, i.e. a destroyed seal, loosely hangs on the container and can fall off during opening the container. As the floor of a surgery room is usually not sterile, a seal which has fallen down cannot be picked up just like that. As it is quite common that several containers are used, it might happen that several seals fall to the floor and impair the safe standing, walking and hence the concentration of the staff.
Another security system for sterile containers is made up of a bendable card which is put from the side into a slit of the container, so that its free end comes to lie in front of the closure tab of the container lid. The inserted end of the card has cutouts which will be engaged by associated protrusions in the slit. This is why the card cannot be removed from the slit if the container is closed. During opening the closure tab, the card is bent and springs back into its original position behind the closure tab. If the closure tab is closed again, the card is situated behind the closure tab and not in front of it, being indicative of the container already having been opened already. A disadvantage of this safety system is that the mechanism allowing the replacement of the card for a successive sterilization procedure is relative complicated, hence expensive and prone to failure and has a negative effect on the sterilization result. What is more, also this safety means is not tamper-proof. With the help of a long, thin object, the card could be bent away prior to closing the closure tab again, so that it will be again situated in front of the closure tab.
A further problem of the previously known seals and safety mechanisms is that it is not readily possible to see at the first glance whether they are already devaluated or destroyed or not. For example with a seal in a looped shape, a destroyed seal can be threaded again into the eyes on the container and an inattentive user will not necessarily notice that the eye has been destroyed already and hence devaluated.
DE 10 2012 004 961 A1 discloses a security seal comprising a seal foot having at least one latching protrusion and a seal head connected with the seal foot and having at least one locking tab. Each of the locking tabs is movably connected with the seal head by means of at least one hinge element. The seal foot comprises latching protrusions elastically formed thereon, which engage correspondingly formed latch structures during attaching the seal on a container and fix the seal on the container. With such a seal, it is not necessarily ensured that the seal is in its correct position and has been undetachably attached on the container. By way of example, the seal may seemingly latch in place on the container or be locked on the latter if it is attached to it in a tilted fashion, without the latching protrusions of the seal indeed having undetachably engaged the latch structure. In this case, the container is only apparently sealed in the correct manner, but can be opened without the possibility of detecting the manipulation. Furthermore, a seal might be potentially used again after the first use, impairing the tamper protection of the system.
In the light of the previously described prior art, the invention is based on the object to provide a security seal for a surgical container, in particular a sterile container, which ensures a correct and user-friendly attachment of the seal on the container and in which the seal indicates a manipulation, in particular the fact of the container having been opened. In the case of a legitimate opening of the container, it should be prevented that some parts of the seal or even the entire seal come loose from the container and fall off. The removal of the seal from the container shall only be possible if the sealed closure has already been opened. The possibility of closing the closure after a devaluation of the seal is to be reliably prevented. Further, the security seal is supposed to be reliably protected from any unintentional devaluation through any impacts other than opening the sealed closure. Finally, it should be possible to remove the security seal without a large effort and without much dexterity.
This object is achieved according to the present invention by a generic security seal as described herein, with the security seal comprising a bolt element which can be positioned between a release position in which the latch structure can be moved relative to the seal foot, and a locked position in which the latch structure is fixed in position and/or locked relative to the seal foot, in particular is received on the seal foot and/or seal head so as to be positionable.
The security seal according to the invention gives a user the possibility to attach and fix it to a corresponding seating on a medical container in a particularly easy manner. This is performed e.g. by inserting the seal with its seal foot into a dedicated seating on the container and/or a container closure. In doing so, the latch structure of the seal engages a mating latch structure of the container or its closure and thus is fixed in position and fastened. According to the invention, the latch structure is relatively movable during attaching the seal on the container and, when being attached on the container, can be moved from its rest position (substantially corresponding to the position in which it engages the mating latch structure) to a deformed position in which it can be moved past the mating latch structure. This is made possible because the bolt element is in its release position during attachment of the seal on the container and does not fix the latch structure in position. In the intended end position on the container, the seal is positioned relative thereto in such a manner that the latch structure and the mating latch structure are in superposition. Upon reaching the end position, the latch structure moves from the deformed position back to the non-deformed rest position (e.g. springs back), whereby the engagement with the mating latch structure is established.
If the seal is in the proper end position and the latch structure is interlocked with the mating latch structure, the bolt element can be transferred from its release position to the locked position. In a particularly advantageous embodiment, this is not possible until there is the correct engagement between the latch structure and the mating latch structure. Otherwise, if the latch structure has not returned to its non-deformed rest position, the bolt element can be blocked by the latch structure or other units of the seal which will be deformed together with it, and hence cannot be transferred to its locked position. This offers the possibility to comprehensibly show the user whether the seal is correctly attached and fixed on the container or not. If the latch structure and the mating latch structure are in correct engagement and if the latch structure is in its non-deformed original position again, the bolt element can be transferred to the locked position. In said locked position, it blocks the latch structure in the position where it is in engagement with the mating latch structure. Thus, removing the seal from the container is not possible if the bolt element is in the locked position. As an alternative, it is also possible that the engagement between the latch structure and the mating latch structure is only established in the course of transferring the bolt element to the locked position. This is the case if a rather plastic material is used for the seal foot or the entire seal.
The locking tab of the seal is intended and adapted to lock the container or a part of its closure if it is properly attached on the container, so that an opening process without impact, alteration or destruction of the locking tab is not possible and will be prevented. The closure may comprise two closure parts, with one of said closure parts being attached on a container lid and the other on a container base. For the purpose of opening the container, a closure part can be positioned relative to the container in any way, for instance can be shifted or swiveled as desired. If the seal is correctly attached on the container, the locking tab is in operative connection with a part of the container or of the container closure. Any process of opening the closure or container necessarily results in an actuation of the locking tab. Such an actuation may involve the locking tab deforming or breaking off entirely or in part, for instance. In any case, an actuation of the locking tab causes an alteration of the seal which can be perceived by a user. Specifically, the actuation of the locking tab may result in a relative movement of the locking tab with respect to the remainder of the security seal which is firmly connected to the container and cannot be released by a manipulation from outside, with the locking tab moving around the hinge element. It is preferred that there occurs a plastic deformation of the hinge element, which can be perceived by a user and is irreversible.
It is preferred that the latch structure can be moved from the rest position to the deformed position by elastic deformation. It may be arranged in particular on a spring arm or similar element which has corresponding spring characteristics. The spring arm may extend from the seal foot in the axial direction. It is especially preferred if the latch structure protrudes from the spring arm in radial direction, in particular radially outward. The security seal advantageously comprises several latch structures, for instance two, three, four or more radially opposing latch structures. These may be positioned in particular with identical angular distances relative to one another.
According to one embodiment, the bolt element is designed like a bolt. It may be arranged in particular so as to be positionable relative to the seal head and/or relative to the seal foot in the direction oft its longitudinal axis. A particularly compact seal and good guidance of the bolt element can be achieved if the bolt element is mounted on or in a through-hole formed in the seal head and/or seal foot.
It is particularly advantageous if the bolt element (with unused security seal) is connected to the seal head and/or the seal foot through predetermined breaking points. In this way, it can be held in particular in its axial position. This allows a user to readily see if the seal has already been used and is to dispose, or if it is an unused seal with which he can expect an unlimited functionality. In this context, an unused security seal means that the bolt element is in its release position. The predetermined breaking points are of such a design that they can be broken without large effort when the user actuates the bolt element, i.e. can be destroyed during transfer of the bolt element from the release position to the locked position. However, they are of sufficient stability to hold the bolt element in the release position, so that the security seal can be properly attached on the container in an especially simple manner.
At least one contact shoulder may be arranged on the bolt element, for instance by one or more circumferential widened features or pockets. During the transfer of the bolt element to the locked position, the contact shoulder engages a mating contact shoulder formed on the seal foot and/or seal head, likewise e.g. pockets or widened features, so that a movement of the bolt element from the locked position back to the release position is prevented. The contact shoulder preferably extends in radial direction. It may extend along the circumference preferably in continuous manner, so that a stable engagement with the mating contact shoulder can be achieved.
In the system according to the invention, the latch structure in the non-deformed state and when being attached to the container as intended, the security seal engages the mating latch structure in an undetachable manner and can be elastically deformed from the non-deformed state for arranging it as intended. For the purpose of properly attaching the security seal on the container, the latch structure can be deformed from the non-deformed state preferably in an elastically deformable manner.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following exemplary and non-limiting description of the invention as well as from a particularly preferred embodiment on the basis of Figures which are merely of schematic nature and only serve for the understanding of the invention. In the Figures:
A security seal 1 according to the invention comprises a seal foot 2, a locking bolt 3 and a seal head 4. The entire security seal 1 is made of plastic in one piece by injection-molding. In
By means of two hinge elements 7, 8, two locking tabs 5, 6 are movably arranged on the seal head 4. The locking tabs 5, 6 are opposite each other in radial direction. In the embodiment illustrated, the security seal 1 is designed to be mirror-symmetric. The hinge elements 7, 8 are laterally formed on the seal head 4.
When the security seal 1 is opened, said hinge elements are deformed. If the hinge elements 7, 8 are bent beyond a certain amount, they are subject to a plastic deformation which results in irreversible changes of the material up to a so-called stress whitening. The degree of the banding or deformation as from which the plastic deformation and/or the stress whitening of the hinge elements 7, 8 occurs, depends on their dimensions, in particular on the height and width of the hinge elements 7, 8 as well as on the material properties.
The seal foot 2 comprises two spring arms 9a, b extending from the seal head 4. Each of said spring arms has its distal end provided with a latching protrusion 10, 11 which are opposite each other in radial direction and protrude radially outward. The latching protrusions 10, 11 protrude with respect to the seal foot 2 in the same directions as the locking tabs 5, 6 with respect to the seal head 4.
The seal head 4 has an essentially rectangular cross-section. The two locking tabs 5,6 and the associated hinge elements 7, 8 likewise result in a substantially rectangular cross-section. In addition, each locking tab 5, 6 protrudes radially with respect to the seal foot 2 and the seal head 4,
Formed on the seal head 4 are two protrusions 12, 13 which project laterally from the seal head 4. They extend along the longer side of the substantially rectangular seal head 4 and each form a supporting area 14 which rests against the side of the locking tabs 5, 6 facing the seal foot 2. Here, a thin material connection may be present which protects the locking tabs 5, 6 from any unintentional actuation—for instance during transport or inserting it into the container—and breaks in case of a larger force—namely from the locking tab. This version is much easier to produce, as the process of demolding the seal 1 after injection-molding is considerably simplified.
Formed in the seal head 4 is a through-hole 17 which is illustrated in
The bolt shaft 18 is provided with pockets 21 which are spaced from each other in the axial direction and are incorporated in the radial direction in the bolt shaft 18 circumferentially surrounding it in part and so as to be discontinued by two axial grooves 32 which are described in more detail below. The pockets 21a which have the lowermost position in
As illustrated in particular in
It can be taken from
The process of sealing a sterilization container 100 will be explained now with reference to
The first closure part 25 has a seating 27 where the spring arms 9a, b of the seal foot 2 can latch in place.
The sterile container 100 is closed by means of the closure 24 and the two closure parts 25, 26 are swiveled relative to each other. The security seal 1 is arranged on the container 100 by inserting it from the outside toward the container 100 through the through-hole 31 into the seating 27. In doing so, the spring arms 9a, b pass through the seating 27 such that the latching protrusions 10, 11 engage behind its surrounding edge and fix the security seal 1 on the closure 24 and hence on the container 100. On the side of the container, the latching protrusions 10, 11 are each provided with a starting bevel 28 which can be clearly seen in
In the further course of sealing the container 100, the locking bolt 3 is pushed into the seal head 4 toward the container 100 and the seal foot 2. Due to the pressure which is exerted on the bolt head 19 by the user, the material webs 23 realized as predetermined breaking points will break. The bolt shaft 18 is pushed through the through-hole 17 and reaches the gap between the two spring arms 9a, b which are in their original position after the latching of the latching protrusions 10, 11. During insertion of the locking bolt 3 into the through-hole 17, the latching protrusions 22 provided on the inner surfaces of the spring arms 9a, b slide over the bolt shaft 18 of the locking bolt 3, and the spring arms 9a, b are slightly deformed radially outwards. In the further course of the insertion process, they engage the pockets 21a on the bolt shaft 18. In the state fully inserted in the seal head 4, which is shown in
The seating 27 has such a design that it has areas, for example, in the form of its edges which are able to produce undercuts with the latching protrusions 22 of the seal foot 2. In this exemplary embodiment, these are two arcuate portions 29 (clearly visible in
If the security seal 1 is fully inserted (see
The security seal 1 according to the invention is supposed to ensure that the safety closure 24 and hence the container 100 cannot be opened without devaluating the security seal 1. The devaluation of the security seal 1 is brought about in that its locking tabs 5, 6 are bent apart due to the contact with the second closure part 26 during opening the closure 24. This results in irreversible, preferably plastic deformation of the locking tabs 5, 6 and/or the hinge elements 7, 8 which has already been described above. The locking tabs 5, 6 are bent up so far until they fit through the through-hole 31 of the second closure element 26. With the locking tabs 5, 6 being bent open, the second closure part 26 moves past the seal head 4, so that the closure 24 can be opened with a concomitant devaluation of the security seal 1. This state is illustrated in
The security seal 1 according to the invention can be used in combination with a closure 24, for instance on a sterile container 100 as shown in
The significant advantages of the security seal 1 according to the invention can be summarized as follows:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
002363317 | Dec 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/061394 | 6/2/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/082086 | 6/11/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3990131 | Okamura | Nov 1976 | A |
4040279 | Signorelli | Aug 1977 | A |
4516684 | Walter | May 1985 | A |
4527821 | Tanaka | Jul 1985 | A |
4915913 | Williams | Apr 1990 | A |
5028187 | Sato | Jul 1991 | A |
5123686 | Wenk | Jun 1992 | A |
5651652 | Williams | Jul 1997 | A |
5671513 | Kawahara | Sep 1997 | A |
5975369 | Yurkewicz | Nov 1999 | A |
6182482 | Issitt | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6322114 | Kurachi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6616479 | Jones | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6827536 | Leon | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6986535 | Kawamoto | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021826 | Benjamins | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7165790 | Bella | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7207758 | Leon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7246828 | Kitzis | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8070403 | Tedeschi | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8221042 | Vitali | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8353397 | Trapp | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8496420 | Aoki | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8622680 | Diep | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8793845 | Benedetti | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9115743 | Yamamoto | Aug 2015 | B2 |
D757258 | Weiβhaupt | May 2016 | S |
20040104230 | Lorenz | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050056645 | Buckley | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050224499 | Jorgensen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070186389 | Smith | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216139 | Mazanek | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080193250 | Boubtane | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217337 | Rault | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237232 | Cohn | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275406 | Smith | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100032432 | Stull, Sr. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050401 | Komeno | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110250104 | Martel | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253579 | Chong | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120160850 | Gelibert | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120291240 | Suzuki | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130091669 | Sasaki | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130175276 | Gleichauf et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130287517 | Fujiwara | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140050548 | Loewe | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140093325 | Mizukoshi | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140319854 | Lee | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150014315 | Weisshaupt | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160047406 | Jamil | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101316769 | Dec 2008 | CN |
102498044 | Jun 2012 | CN |
9405787 | Jun 1994 | DE |
4411970 | Oct 1995 | DE |
60101044 | Jul 2004 | DE |
102007051428 | Apr 2009 | DE |
102012004961 | Sep 2013 | DE |
2053582 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2714991 | Jul 1995 | FR |
2013539999 | Oct 2013 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related International Application No. PCT/EP2014/061394, dated Jul. 10, 2014. |
Chinese Office Action with English language translation for Application No. 201480065235.7, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 51 pages. |
Japanese Office Action with English language translation for Application No. 2016-555736, dated Dec. 21, 2016, 5 pages. |
German Examination Report with English language translation for Application No. 11 2014 001 755.2, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170001770 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |