The present invention relates to a pull-through security seal.
Pull-through security seals in which a band or strip having locking means is pushed through a receiving opening arranged at one end of the band or strip, and is prevented from being pulled out by means of restraining means mounted in the receiving opening, are known, for example, from WO 95/27968. This reference shows among others a seal which has a flat base body with a push-through opening directed perpendicularly with respect to the surface. A looping member in the form of a flat tongue or flange is constructed directly on the base body leading away perpendicularly with respect to the push-through direction. The end of this tongue can now be guided in one direction into the push-through opening and can be pushed therethrough. A loop is formed thereby, the size of which, namely its diameter, can be influenced by the extent of the length of the tongue pushed therethrough. This loop becomes smaller with an increasing length of the tongue pushed therethrough. Since the restraining means in the push-through opening prevent a pulling back of the tongue, the loop can be opened only by breaking or tearing of the tongue.
Furthermore, pull-through security seals are also known in which the tongue is formed out of one side with an essentially circular cross section, which seals have at regular intervals ball-shaped or conically-shaped nubs which can engage resilient restraining means arranged in the push-through opening of the seal. With this it is possible to achieve a reliable locking of the tongue in one direction, and the loop can be reduced, particularly tightened, corresponding with the distances between the nubs at discrete distances corresponding with the needs.
The problem of such security seals lies in preventing a manipulation of the locking function, namely in preventing a not noticeable manipulation of the lock of closed seals to effect an opening and a subsequently closing from occurring.
Thus common security seals with flat tongues have the disadvantage that with thin small plates, after locking of the seal from the push-in side, the restraining means can be blocked. Thus it becomes possible to pull the tongues without noticeable damage out of the push-through opening and to thus open the loop. The seal can subsequently, as intended, be locked and a manipulation cannot be noticed.
The same problem occurs also in the case of pull-through seals, the tongues of which have a circular cross section and have tooth elements also having a circular cross section. In addition, such seals have the problem that with simple means, as, for example, a thin-walled sleeve in the correct dimensions, which sleeve can be manufactured with very simple means, it is possible to block, particularly to render functionless, the locking mechanism from the outlet side of the push-through opening. Thus it is possible to pull the tongue also, as already described above, again out of the push-through opening, and to open the loop, and to lock same thereafter again without such action being noticed.
The mentioned tools for both known types of seals can, due to their simple geometric design, be manufactured with simple means without great expense.
The purpose of the present invention was now to find a pull-through security seal of the mentioned type which has a high manipulation safety during locking.
The tongue of the pull-through security seal of the invention does not have a geometrically simple cross section, but a cross-sectional shape having edges. Thus a high manipulation safety is achieved. This shape makes the manufacture of a suitably designed and effective manipulation tool very difficult and it is made practically impossible without special machine tools, great expense and advanced technical knowledge.
The inventive design nevertheless is able, as by comparison to the circular cross section of the tongues of common pull-through seals, to absorb large pull forces through the multiple tooth systems.
In order to simplify the threading of the tongue into the pull-through opening of the base body, guiding elements are preferably arranged in the area of the tip of the tongue in front of the tooth-like toe, which guiding elements guide the tongue.
The number of the toes, which are arranged circularly in cross section, can basically be variably chosen depending on the area of use and size of the seals, particularly the dimension of the tongue. It has been found that on the one hand the symmetric arrangement of four toes in a cross shape has proven to be successful both in manufacture and also in operation.
The preferred shape of the toes in the shape of rectangular triangles with flattened tip can, of course, also be adapted to the restraining means and can be suitably modified.
In order for the pull-through seal to be able to be also again removed in a simple manner without the aid of tools after use, it is preferably provided that the tongue is guided from the front laterally along one edge of the base body of the seal and is connected to the base body by webs. These webs serve as a rated break point and thus enable a simple tearing open of the locked seal.
The end of the tongue, which end is on the side of the base body, is preferably not guided all the way to the rear end of the base body but ends at a flange constructed at this point on the base body. Thus it is possible to manufacture the seals, which usually are made of a plastic, simply via injection tools in large amounts as piece goods, whereby the seals connect advantageously only through webs which are connected only directly to the base body, particularly the flange. These webs are now also designed as rated break points so that the individual seals can be easily separated from the piece goods. These connecting webs are dimensioned in such a manner that they have a lower tearing force, particularly breaking force, than the rated break points between the tongue and the base body. It is prevented in this manner that during separating of the seals one seal is erroneously destroyed by tearing off the tongue.
The outlet of the housing compartment housing the restraining means is designed corresponding with the cross section of the tongue in such a manner that at this point no common, simply designed tube-shaped manipulation means can be introduced in order to prevent the engagement between the tongue, particularly the toes and the restraining means.
The inlet has guiding ribs which are designed also preferably corresponding with the cross-sectional shape of the tongue, and which are arranged parallel with respect to the pull-through direction inside of the housing compartment, preferably in front of the restraining means themselves.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be discussed hereinafter in greater detail in connection with the drawings, in which:
These restraining means are designed in a common conventional manner with radially extending resilient hooks 5, which engage the tooth-like designed toes 6 of the tongue when same is introduced through the pull-through opening 7 of the housing component 3. This can be seen in the schematic illustration of the longitudinal cross section of this seal in
The restraining means 4 are, for example, fixedly and non-releasably connected to the base body 1 through welding.
The tongue has, for example, a circular base cross section and has toes 6, which are arranged successively on one or, if necessary, several sections along its longitudinal axis. These toes 6 are preferably designed as triangles with flat side portions 6′ and flattened tip, which triangles protrude radially outwardly from the tongue body.
A manipulation tool would now have to be manufactured as an extremely thin-walled sleeve with the corresponding cross section in order to be able to influence, if necessary, the restraining means 4 to the respective hooks 5. This can be very easily accomplished in common pull-through seals having a completely symmetrical, circular cross section or simple, flat cross sections, whereas the illustrated cross-sectional shapes can only be manufactured, if at all, with a very great complexity, thus substantially avoiding the danger of manipulation.
Guiding ribs 9 are constructed in the area of the pull-through opening 7, which are arranged preferably parallel to the pull-through direction inside of the restraining means 4. These guiding ribs 9 result again in an open cross section corresponding approximately with the cross-sectional shape of the tongue 2, and rotate in particular the tongue 2 into the correspondingly correct opposition so that the toes 6 each come into central contact with the corresponding hooks 5, and thus permit a reliable engagement of the tongue 2 with the base body 1.
In order to further simplify the guiding in of the tongue 2, guiding elements 10 are advantageously constructed directly in front of the front-most toe 6 preferably in the area of the tip of the tongue, as this is illustrated in
The tip of the tongue in front of the respective rows of toes, respectively the guiding elements 10, can furthermore have a number of circularly shaped beads 11. These beads 11 have a diameter, which is less in comparison to the diameter of the toes 6, as this can be seen in
The tongue 2 particularly the end 2′ of the tongue, is preferably connected to the base body 1 through the two webs 13. These webs 13 serve advantageously as rated break points, through which the tongue 2 after use can be simply torn off from the base body 1 without that special tools or cutting devices would be needed to accomplish this task.
The individual pull-through seals themselves are now preferably each connected with one another also through webs 14 as piece goods, whereby these webs are constructed each oriented directly between the side edges and flanges 12 of adjacent pull-through seals during the injection process. These webs 14 are now advantageously dimensioned in such a manner that they serve as rated break points during separation of the pull-through seals. The thickness of these webs 14 is at the same time dimensioned in such a manner that the tearing force, particularly the breaking load thereof, is less than is the tearing force for the webs 13 oriented between the base body 1 and the tongue 2. Thus, it can be advantageously prevented that, instead of the separation of the individual pull-through seals from the piece goods, the tongues 2 are unintentionally torn off from the base body 1, and thus the seals are destroyed prior to use.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH00/00168 | 3/23/2000 | WO | 00 | 2/5/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/71699 | 9/27/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
601770 | Dockstader | Apr 1898 | A |
712250 | Brooks | Oct 1902 | A |
1188886 | Booth | Jun 1916 | A |
2840409 | Ashworth | Jun 1958 | A |
3597803 | Van Neil | Aug 1971 | A |
4240183 | Sumimoto et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
5031943 | Scott et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5907891 | Meyer | Jun 1999 | A |
6009997 | Deschenes et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6511108 | Roessner et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6612139 | Costa | Sep 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 676 736 | Oct 1995 | EP |
1 288 128 | Aug 1962 | FR |
WO9527968 | Oct 1995 | WO |