Security system that uses indirect password-based encryption

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7836310
  • Patent Number
    7,836,310
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 1, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 16, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Moorthy; Aravind K
    Agents
    • Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Abstract
An improved system and approaches for protecting passwords are disclosed. A file security system for an organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits users from accessing some or all of the files (e.g., documents) associated with the organization. According to one aspect, a password entered by a user is used, provided it is authenticated, to obtain a respective authentication string (a relatively longer string of numbers or characters). The retrieved authentication string is then used to enable the user to enter the file security system and/or to access secured files therein. According to another aspect, user passwords are not stored in the file security system to avoid security breaches due to unauthorized capture of user passwords.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/075,194, filed Feb. 12, 2002, and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING MULTI-LOCATION ACCESS MANAGEMENT TO SECURED ITEMS,” which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to security systems for data and, more particularly, to security systems that protect data in an inter/intra enterprise environment.


2. Description of Related Art


As organizations become more dependent on networks for business transactions, data sharing and everyday communications, their networks have to be increasingly accessible to customers, employees, suppliers, partners, contractors and telecommuters. Unfortunately, as the accessibility increases, so does the exposure of critical data that is stored on the network. Hackers can threaten all kinds of valuable corporate information resources including intellectual property (e.g., trade secrets, software code and competitive data), sensitive employee information (e.g., payroll figures and HR records), and classified information (e.g., passwords, databases, customer records, product information and financial data).


In protecting the proprietary information traveling across networks, one or more cryptographic techniques are often used to secure a private communication session between two communicating computers on the network. Cryptographic techniques provide a way to transmit information across an unsecure communication channel without disclosing the contents of the information to anyone who may be eavesdropping on the communication channel. An encryption process is a cryptographic technique whereby one party can protect the contents of data in transit from access by an unauthorized third party, yet the intended party can read the data using a corresponding decryption process.


Many organizations have deployed firewalls, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) to provide protection. Unfortunately, these various security means have been proven insufficient to reliably protect proprietary information residing on internal networks.


Electronic data is often secured through use of passwords. The passwords can be document level, operating system level or system level. While passwords do provide some security to the electronic data, users tend to mismanage their passwords. For example, users may use short passwords which are easier for an attacker to crack, resulting in possible security breaches of a system. To facilitate the use of passwords, a system has to maintain somewhere information pertaining to the passwords. However, by doing so, the passwords are put in jeopardy of being discovered by an attacker.


Moreover, security policies often request passwords be periodically changed to improve security of a system. Also, in a security system that encrypts data based on user passwords, changing user passwords can be very complicated and result in time consuming updating of all affected encrypted data in the system.


Thus, there is a need for improved approaches to utilize passwords in a security system.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to an improved system and approaches for protecting passwords. A security system for an organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits users from accessing some or all of the files (e.g., various data and documents) associated with the organization. Passwords are normally required by users seeking to access the files protected by the security system. According to one aspect of the invention, a password entered by a user is used, provided it is authenticated, to obtain a respective authentication string (a relatively longer string of numbers or characters). The retrieved authentication string is then used to enable the user to enter the security system and/or to access secured files therein. According to another aspect of the invention, user passwords are not stored in the security system to avoid security breaches due to unauthorized capture of user passwords.


The present invention may be used in many types of security systems. To facilitate the description of the present invention, unless specifically stated, a security system or a file security system is interchangeably used herein. The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a method, system, device, and computer readable medium. Several embodiments of the invention are discussed below.


As a method for authenticating a user to a file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving a user-entered password to gain access to files protected by the file security system; generating a random number of a predetermined length; converting the random number into an authentication string; encrypting the authentication string using the user-entered password to produce an encrypted authentication string; and storing the encrypted authentication string in the file security system for subsequent usage.


As a method for authenticating a user to a file security system, another embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving a user-entered password to gain access to files protected by the file security system; accessing an encrypted authentication string from the file security system; decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the user-entered password to produce an authentication string; determining whether the user is authenticated; permitting access to the file security system when the determining determines that the user is authenticated; and denying access to the file security system when the determining determines that the user is not authenticated.


As a method for re-authenticating a user to a file security system where the user was previously authenticated to the file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: determining whether a re-authorization condition exists; and re-authenticating the user to the file security system when the re-authorization condition exists. Further, according to the embodiment, the re-authenticating includes at least the acts of: receiving a user-entered password; accessing an encrypted authentication string from the file security system; decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the user-entered password to produce an authentication string; determining whether the user is re-authenticated; permitting access to the file security system when the determining determines that the user is re-authenticated; and denying access to the file security system when the determining determines that the user is not re-authenticated.


As a method for changing a password of a user, the password being associated with a file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving a new user-entered password to gain access to files protected by the file security system; receiving an existing user password; accessing an encrypted authentication string from the file security system; decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the existing user password to produce an authentication string; determining whether the user is authenticated; denying the user from changing the password from the existing user password to the new user-entered password when the determining determines that the user is not authenticated; and permitting the user to change the password from the existing user password to the new user-entered password when the determining determines that the user is authenticated. Additionally, the method can further include the act of encrypting the authentication string with the new user-entered password.


As a computer readable medium including at least computer program code for authenticating a user to a file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: computer program code for receiving a user-entered password to gain access to files protected by the file security system; computer program code for generating a random number of a predetermined length; computer program code for converting the random number into an authentication string; computer program code for encrypting the authentication string using the user-entered password to produce an encrypted authentication string; and computer program code for storing the encrypted authentication string in the file security system for subsequent usage.


As a computer readable medium including at least computer program code for authenticating a user to a file security system, another embodiment of the invention includes at least: computer program code for receiving a user-entered password to gain access to files protected by the file security system; computer program code for accessing an encrypted authentication string from the file security system; computer program code for decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the user-entered password to produce an authentication string; computer program code for determining whether the user is authenticated; computer program code for permitting access to the file security system when the computer program code for determining determines that the user is authenticated; and computer program code for denying access to the file security system when the computer program code for determining determines that the user is not authenticated.


As a computer readable medium including at least computer program code for re-authenticating a user to a file security system, where the user was previously authenticated to the file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: computer program code for determining whether a re-authorization condition exists, and computer program code for re-authenticating the user to the file security system when the re-authorization condition exists. Further, according to one embodiment, the computer program code for re-authenticating includes at least: computer program code for receiving a user-entered password; computer program code for accessing an encrypted authentication string from the file security system; computer program code for decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the user-entered password to produce an authentication string; computer program code for determining whether the user is re-authenticated; computer program code for permitting access to the file security system when the computer program code for determining determines that the user is re-authenticated; and computer program code for denying access to the file security system when the computer program code for determining determines that the user is not re-authenticated.


As a computer readable medium including at least computer program code for changing a password of a user, the password being associated with a file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: computer program code for receiving a new user-entered password to gain access to files protected by the file security system; computer program code for receiving an existing user password; computer program code for accessing an encrypted authentication string from the file security system; computer program code for decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the existing user password to produce an authentication string; computer program code for determining whether the user is authenticated; computer program code for denying the user from changing the password from the existing user password to the new user-entered password when the computer program code for determining determines that the user is not authenticated; and computer program code for permitting the user to change the password from the existing user password to the new user-entered password when the computer program code for determining determines that the user is authenticated. Additionally, the computer readable medium can further include computer program code for encrypting the authentication string with the new user-entered password.


Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon examining the following detailed description of an embodiment thereof, taken in conjunction with the attached drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:



FIG. 1 is a file security system according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are flow diagrams of security system processing according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of user password setup processing according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of user authentication processing according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are flow diagrams of change password processing according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of re-authentication processing according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 shows a basic security system in which the invention may be practiced in accordance with one embodiment thereof.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary data structure of a secured file that may be used in one embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to an improved system and approaches for protecting passwords. A file security system for an organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits users from accessing some or all of the files (e.g., documents) associated with the organization. Passwords are normally required by users seeking to access the files protected by the file security system. According to one aspect of the invention, a password entered by a user is used, provided it is authenticated, to obtain a respective authentication string (a relatively longer string of numbers or characters). The retrieved authentication string is then used to enable the user to enter the file security system and/or to access secured files therein. According to another aspect of the invention, user passwords are not stored in the file security system to avoid security breaches due to unauthorized capture of user passwords. The invention is suitable for use in an enterprise file security system.


A file security system (or document security system) serves to limit access to files (documents) only to authorized users. Often, an organization, such as a company, would use a file security system to limit access to its files (documents). For example, users of a group might be able to access files (documents) pertaining to the group, whereas other users not within the group would not be able to access such files (documents). Such access, when permitted, would allow a user of the group to retrieve a copy of the file (document) via a data network.


Secured files are files that require one or more keys, passwords, access privileges, etc. to gain access to their content. In one embodiment, the security is provided through encryption and access rules. The files, for example, can pertain to documents, multimedia files, data, executable code, images and text. In general, a secured file can only be accessed by authenticated users with appropriate access rights or privileges. In one embodiment, each secured file is provided with a header portion and a data portion, where the header portion contains or points to security information. The security information is used to determine whether access to associated data portions of secured files is permitted.


As used herein, a user may mean a human user, a software agent, a group of users, a member of a group of users, a device and/or application. Besides a human user who needs to access a secured document, a software application or agent sometimes needs to access secured files in order to proceed. Accordingly, unless specifically stated, the “user” as used herein does not necessarily pertain to a human being.


In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will become obvious to those skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. The description and representation herein are the common meanings used by those experienced or skilled in the art to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present invention.


Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Further, the order of blocks in process flowcharts or diagrams representing one or more embodiments of the invention do not inherently indicate any particular order nor imply any limitations in the invention.


Embodiments of the present invention are discussed herein with reference to FIGS. 1-8. However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the detailed description given herein with respect to these figures is for explanatory purposes as the invention extends beyond these limited embodiments.



FIG. 1 is a file security system 100 according to one embodiment of the invention. The file security system 100 includes a central server 102 that provides access control to various files (e.g., documents). The access control ensures that only authorized users are able to access the files. Users can interact with the central server 102 through client machines 104, 106 and 108.


The file security system 100 can also make use of one or more local servers 110. The local server 110 illustrated in FIG. 1 serves to locally process some of the access control operations that would otherwise be performed by the central server 102. The presence of the local server 110 allows the client machines 106 and 108 to obtain more reliable and faster service with respect to access control provided by the file security system 100. Hence, the local server 110 is not a necessity but, if provided, can serve to enhance the responsiveness and reliability of the system.


Files are typically secured through encryption and stored in a storage device. For example, files (secured files) can be stored to a storage device 112 that is accessible by any of the client machines 104, 106 and 108 via the central server 102. Additionally, each of the client machines 104, 106 and 108 can provide their own local storage for files (secured files). For example, a user of the client machine 104 may store files pertaining to the user at the client machine 104 as well as at the storage device 112. Regardless of where the secured files are stored, for a user to be permitted access to the secured files, the file security system 100 requires that the user enter a user password at the client machine 104. The user password is then processed to determine whether the user is able to be authenticated. Thereafter, when properly authenticated, the user is thereafter able to access the secured files stored locally or remotely.


The file security system 100 is configured to utilize the user password indirectly. In other words, access to secured files in the file security system 100 is not granted based on a user password provided by an authorized user; instead, access is based on an authenticated string. The authentication string can take various forms. In one embodiment, the authentication string can be 128-bits in length and consist of numbers or characters which can be converted to 32-bytes (256 bits). For example, a user at a client machine would utilize her user password to log into a client machine (e.g., client machine 106). However, the client machine would only temporarily retain the user password in volatile memory (e.g., random access memory (RAM)) and would not use the user password to proceed with the entry to the file security system 100. Instead, the client machine is configured to use an authenticated string that is encrypted using the user password. The encrypted authentication string is stored in non-volatile memory (e.g., a file stored to a disk drive) of the client machine. After the user successfully logs into the client machine, the authenticated string is retrieved (e.g., decrypted with the provided user password) and then used to access the file security system 100 or the secured files therein.


Often, for ease of remembering, a user password pertains to some features related to its user and is relatively short, typically not more than 20 characters. In contrast, an authentication string can be made artificially long and random, such as 101101 . . . 10111 (binary) or AB01F98 . . . 001 (hexadecimal). Cracking an authentication string is much more difficult, if not possible, than cracking a user password. Consequently, access based on an authentication string to the file security system 100 is a lot more secure. Attacks to the file security system 100 by unauthorized users are thus made more difficult because user passwords are only indirectly used. Still further, the file security system 100 is able to easily perform password modifications (or changes) because the authentication string is not altered, though the encrypted authentication string would be altered given a new user password. Moreover, producing the new encrypted authenticated string is computationally easy to perform and thus can be performed quickly, even at run-time if so desired.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are flow diagrams of security system processing 200 according to one embodiment of the invention. The security system processing 200 can be performed locally on a client machine or remotely on a server machine, or partially at the client machine and partially at the server machine. As an example, the client machine can be any of the client machines 104, 106 and 108 illustrated in FIG. 1, and the server machine can be either the central server 102 or the local server 110 illustrated in FIG. 1.


The security system processing 200 initially presents 202 a login window requesting that the user enter a user password. A decision 204 then determines whether a login request has been received. A login request is received when the user has entered the user password into the login window and requested login. When the decision 204 determines that a login request has not yet been received, the security system processing 200 awaits such a request. Once the decision 204 determines that a login request has been received, then a decision 206 determines whether the user is a new user. For example, the login window might also ask for a user identifier or user name, and a mismatch of any data identifying the user would signal that the user is a new user.


In any case, when the decision 206 determines that the user is a new user, then user password setup processing is performed 208 so as to set up the user as an authorized user of the file security system. It is assumed herein that the user (e.g., a new employee) has been authorized to access the file security system. The user password setup processing 208 can be achieved by an administrator or the user him/herself. Following the operation 208, the security system processing 200 returns to the beginning of the security system processing 200 so that the user may then log into the file security system.


On the other hand, when the decision 206 determines that the user is not a new user, then user authentication processing is performed 210 to determine whether the user is able to be successfully authenticated. A decision 212 then determines whether the user has been authenticated. When the decision 212 determines that the user has been successfully authenticated, then the user password is used to obtain a corresponding authentication string. The authentication string is stored or distributed in a secured manner and can only be recovered for use when a correct password is provided. According to one embodiment, the authentication string is encrypted in a file (e.g., xyz.aes when AES is used) and can only be recovered when a correct user password (e.g., passphrase) is provided. Here, the user password, when received via the login request, is temporarily stored in volatile memory (e.g., RAM). Hence, at operation 214, the previously temporarily stored user password is removed (e.g., deleted) from the volatile memory. Next, access to the file security system is permitted 216 since the user has been authenticated and thus is able to be logged into the file security system with the authentication string.


Alternatively, when the decision 212 determines that the user has not been properly authenticated, then access to the file security system is thus denied 220. Following the operation 220, the security system processing 200 ends with access to the file security system being denied.


Following the operation 216, various different operations can be performed by the security system processing 200. Two of various security related operations that are able to be performed before, during or after other operations that the file security system might perform, include password changes and user re-authentication. More particularly, a decision 222 can determine whether a password change is being requested. When the decision 222 determines that a password change is being requested, then change password processing can be performed 224. Alternatively, a decision 226 determines whether user re-authentication is requested. When the decision 226 determines that user re-authentication is requested, then user re-authentication processing is performed 228. Following the operation 228, the security system processing 200 returns to repeat the decision 212 and subsequent operations. Eventually, if no other operations are to be performed, including password change and user re-authentication, the security system processing 200 ends.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of user password setup processing 300 according to one embodiment of the invention. The user password setup processing 300 is typically performed when a new user desires to set up a user password and thus be permitted to gain access to certain files within a file security system using the user password.


The user password setup processing 300 generates 302 a random number. Typically, the random number is generated by a random number generator provided by a computing device (e.g., client machine). Normally, the random number would be of a predetermined length. For example, the random number can be 1024 bits. Next, the random number is converted 304 to an authentication string. For example, the random number is a binary numerical value and its conversion into the authentication string involves converting the binary number to a hexadecimal value. As a result, the random number is converted into a string, which itself is a random string. The authentication string is then encrypted 306 using the user password to produce an encrypted authentication string. The user password used in encrypting 306 the authentication string was previously entered by the user. For example, the user might have entered the user password in response to the login window presented 202 during the security system processing 200 shown in FIG. 2A. The encrypted authentication string can also be considered a cipher-text. After the encrypted authentication string has been produced, the encrypted authentication string is stored 308 in a computing system so that the encrypted authentication string can later be retrieved and decrypted with a correct user password. Typically, the file security system is distributed between one or more client machines and one or more server machines. Hence, in one embodiment, the encrypted authentication string is stored 308 to the client machine. For example, the encrypted authentication string can be stored to a file at the client machine. In general, the encrypted authentication string can be stored to a client machine and/or a server machine. Following the operation 308, the user password setup processing 300 is complete and ends.


In effect, the authentication string serves as a password that is rather long and random. Such password can be considered as an indirect password and be used to enter (e.g., log into) the file security system to access secured files, secure files, and other operations involving security (e.g., certificates imports and exports).



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of user authentication processing 400 according to one embodiment of the invention. The user authentication processing 400 represents processing that can be performed to carry out the operation 210 illustrated in FIG. 2A.


The user authentication processing 400 initially opens 402 a security system file pertaining to the user. The security system file is a file maintained by the file security system that includes the encrypted authentication string associated with the user. For example, the security system file can store the encrypted authentication string due to operation 308 of the user password setup processing 300. Here, the security system file is opened 402 at least when user authentication is to be performed.


After the security system file has been opened 402, an encrypted authentication string associated with the user is retrieved 404 from the security system file. Next, the encrypted authentication string is decrypted 406 using the user password. Note that the user password was previously entered (e.g., during a login request) and can be held in non-volatile memory until the user authentication processing 400 is performed. The result of the decryption 406 of the encrypted authentication string produces an authentication string. A decision 408 then determines whether the decryption 406 of the encrypted authentication string was successful. In other words, the authentication string is used to determine whether the user is able to be properly and correctly authenticated based upon the decryption 406 of the encrypted authentication string with the user password supplied by the user. When the decision 408 determines that decryption of the encrypted authentication string was not successful (i.e., fails) then authentication is deemed 410 to be unsuccessful. On the other hand, when the decision 408 determines that decryption of the encrypted authentication string was successful then authentication is deemed 412 to be successful. Following the operations 410 and 412, the user authentication processing 400 is complete and ends.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are flow diagrams of change password processing 500 according to one embodiment of the invention. The change password processing 500 is, for example, processing performed by the change password processing associated with the operation 224 illustrated in FIG. 2B.


The change password processing 500 initially presents 502 a password change window that requests a new user password (and perhaps an existing password). Typically, the password change window would be presented 502 at a client machine associated with the user. Next, a decision 504 determines whether the password(s) has/have been submitted. When the decision 504 determines that the password(s) have not yet been submitted, then the change password processing 500 awaits such password(s). On the other hand, when the decision 504 determines that the password(s) have been submitted, then the security system file pertaining to the user is opened 506. Next, an encrypted authentication string is retrieved 508 from the security system file. After the encrypted authentication string has been retrieved 508, the encrypted authentication string is then decrypted 510 with the existing user password. The result of the decryption 510 is that an authentication string is produced. A decision 512 then determines whether decryption was successful. Typically, the decryption is successful if the authentication string can be successfully recovered from the security system file with the old password. However, other authentication procedures or system access privileges may additionally be enforced to ensure that the user is permitted to change his/her password. When the decision 512 determines that the decryption was not successful, then the password change request is denied 514 and the change password processing 500 ends.


On the other hand, when the decision 512 determines that decryption was successful, then the authentication string is encrypted 516 using the new user password. The encryption of the authentication string produces a new encrypted authentication string. The new encrypted authentication string is then stored 518. Typically, the new encrypted authentication string would be stored where the old encrypted authentication string was previously stored. In one embodiment, the file containing at least the encrypted authentication string is referred to as a security system file. In one implementation, the storage 518 of the new encrypted authentication string would overwrite the previous encrypted authentication string. Following the operation 518, the change password processing 500 is complete and ends with the password change request having been performed.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of re-authentication processing 600 according to one embodiment of the invention. As noted above with respect to FIG. 2B, at times, a file security system may desire to re-authenticate a user. Re-authentication can provide the file security system with additional assurances that the user at the client machine is still the user that was previously authenticated and permitted access to the file security system. Typically, the re-authentication would be required by a file security system prior to performing important security tasks. One example of an important task is exporting a certificate associated with a user to another machine. As another example, a file security system can cause re-authentication to be periodically performed. In any case, when re-authentication is required, the re-authentication processing 600 can represent one embodiment of the user re-authentication processing that is performed at operation 228 of FIG. 2B.


The re-authentication processing 600 initially presents 602 a password re-enter window that requests a user to re-enter their password. A decision 604 then determines whether a user password has been submitted. When the decision 604 determines that a user password has not yet been submitted, the re-authentication processing 600 awaits such a submission. On the other hand, when the decision 604 determines that a password has been submitted, then the security system file pertaining to the user is opened 606. An encrypted authentication string is then retrieved 608 from the security system file. Here, the security system file is a file maintained by the file security system that includes at least an encrypted authentication string. In one embodiment, the security system file includes only the encrypted authentication string. In another embodiment, the security system file includes other information besides the encrypted authentication string and thus the retrieval can involve parsing the security system file to acquire the encrypted authentication string. Next, the authentication string is decrypted 610 from the security system file with the user password. The result of the decryption 610 is an authentication string that is used to authenticate the user, and allow the user to continue access to the secured files in the file security system.



FIG. 7 shows a basic security system 700 in which the invention may be practiced in accordance with one embodiment thereof. The security system 700 may be employed in an enterprise or inter-enterprise environment having a network A 708 and a network B 710. It includes a first server 706 (also referred to as a central server) providing centralized access management for the enterprise. The first server 706 can control restrictive access to files secured by the security system 700. To provide dependability, reliability and scalability of the system, one or more second servers 704 (also referred to as local servers, of which one is shown) may be employed to provide backup or distributed access management for users of client machines serviced locally. For illustration purposes, there are two client machines 701 and 702 being serviced by a local server 704. Alternatively, one of the client machines 701 and 702 may be considered as a networked storage device.


Secured files may be stored in either one of the devices 701, 702, 704, 706 and 712. When a user of the client machine 701 attempts to exchange a secured file with a remote destination 712 being used by an external user, one or more of the processing 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 discussed above can be activated and be performed by the security system 700.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary data structure 820 of a secured file that may be used in one embodiment of the invention. The data structure 820 includes two portions: a header (or header portion) 822 and encrypted data (or an encrypted data portion) 824. The header 822 can be generated in various forms depending on implementation. In one embodiment, the header 822 includes security information 826 that may further include a number of access rules 829 and a file key 830 and thus provides restrictive access to the data portion 824 which is an encrypted version of a plain file. Optionally, the data structure 820 may also include an error-checking portion 825 that stores one or more error-checking codes, for example, a separate error-checking code for each block of encrypted data 824. These error-checking codes may also be associated with a Cyclical Redundancy Check (CRC) for the header 822 and/or the encrypted data 824. The header 822 includes a flag bit or signature 827 and security information 826 that is in accordance with the security template for the store.


The security information 826 can vary depending upon implementation. However, as shown in FIG. 8, the security information 826 includes a user identifier (ID) 828, access policy (access rules) 829, a file key 830 and other information 831. Although multiple user identifiers may be used, a user identifier 828 is used to identify a user or a group that is permitted to access the secured file. The access rules 829 provide restrictive access to the encrypted data portion 824. The file key 830 is a cipher key that, once obtained, can be used to decrypt the encrypted data portion 824 and thus, in general, is protected. In one implementation of the data structure 820, the file key 830 is encrypted in conjunction with the access rules 829. In another implementation of the data structure 820, the file key 830 is double encrypted with a protection key and further protected by the access rules 829. The other information 831 is an additional space for other information to be stored within the security information 826. For example, the other information 831 may be used to include other information facilitating secure access to the secured file, such as version number or author identifier.


According to one embodiment, the above-noted encrypted authentication strings can be provided on a per-user or a per-group of users basis. With the appropriate user or group password, the encrypted authentication string can be successfully decrypted and utilized internal to the file security system as a password. In other words, the authentication string is used as a password for access to the file security system or the secured files therein.


Additional details on a security system can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/075,194, filed Feb. 12, 2002, and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING MULTI-LOCATION ACCESS MANAGEMENT TO SECURED ITEMS,” which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.


The invention is preferably implemented by software or a combination of hardware and software, but can also be implemented in hardware. The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of tangible computer readable media include read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, DVDs, magnetic tape, and optical data storage devices. Examples of transmission media include carrier waves. Computer readable code from the tangible computer readable medium can also be distributed over network-coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.


The various embodiments, implementations and features of the invention noted above can be combined in various ways or used separately. Those skilled in the art will understand from the description that the invention can be equally applied to or used in other various different settings with respect to various combinations, embodiments, implementations or features provided in the description herein.


The advantages of the invention are numerous. Different embodiments or implementations may yield one or more of the following advantages. One advantage of the invention is that user passwords are only stored in a transient manner, thus minimizing opportunities for unauthorized persons to crack the user passwords. Another advantage of the invention is that indirect passwords are used in place of passwords. The indirect passwords are normally be longer and more random, thus making an attack on passwords much more difficult. Still another advantage of the invention is that password modifications are able to be easily achieved by file security systems that protect secured files (e.g., documents) using indirect passwords. Yet still another advantage of the invention is that open software can be given an indirect password so as not to compromise a user password.


The many features and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the written description, and thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation as illustrated and described. Hence, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to as falling within the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for authenticating a user to a file security system, the method comprising: receiving notification of a login request that includes at least a password associated with the user;decrypting an encrypted authentication string with the password received with the login request to produce a decrypted authentication string, the encrypted authentication string having been created using a random number of a predetermined length and encrypted using a previously-received password associated with the user; anddetermining whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the received password is never stored in a file by or for the file security system.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the received password is never stored in a non-volatile manner.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: permitting access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: denying access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 6. A method for authenticating a user to a file security system, the method comprising: receiving a password associated with the user;accessing an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system, the encrypted authentication string having been created using a random number of a predetermined length and encrypted using a previously-received password, wherein the encrypted authentication string is associated with the user;decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the received password to produce a decrypted authentication string; anddetermining whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising removing the received password from memory after the decrypting.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the file security system is provided on at least one computer, the computer having non-volatile storage and volatile storage, the method further comprising:removing the received password from the volatile storage after the decrypting, andwherein following receiving the password and before removing the received password after the decrypting, the received password is only stored in the volatile storage.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 6, the determining further comprising determining whether decryption of the encrypted authentication string was successful.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising: permitting access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising: denying access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 12. A method for re-authenticating a user to a file security system, where the user was previously authenticated to the file security system, comprising: determining whether a re-authorization condition exists; andre-authenticating the user to the file security system in response to determining that the re-authorization condition exists, said re-authenticating includes at least:receiving a password associated with the user;accessing an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system;decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the received password to produce an authentication string; anddetermining whether the user is re-authenticated based on said decrypting.
  • 13. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein determining whether a re-authorization condition exists includes determining that the user is attempting to perform an operation with respect to the file security system that is deemed to be highly guarded.
  • 14. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein determining whether a re-authorization condition exists includes determining that the user is attempting to export a certificate.
  • 15. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the re-authentication further includes the act of removing the received password from memory after the decrypting.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the file security system is provided on at least one computer, the computer having non-volatile storage and volatile storage, wherein the re-authentication further includes the act of:removing the received password from the volatile storage after the decrypting, andwherein following the receiving of the password and before the removing, the received password is only stored in the volatile storage.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 12, the determining further comprising determining whether decryption of the encrypted authentication string was successful.
  • 18. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising: permitting access to the file security system in response to determining that the user is re-authenticated.
  • 19. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising: denying access to the file security system in response to determining that the user is not re-authenticated.
  • 20. A method for changing a password of a user, wherein the password is associated with a file security system, the method comprising: retrieving a stored, existing password associated with the user;accessing an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system, the encrypted authentication string having been created by: generating a random number of a predetermined length;converting the random number into the authentication string; andencrypting the authentication string using the existing password, so as to associate the encrypted authentication string with the user;decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the existing password to produce a decrypted authentication string; anddetermining whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting.
  • 21. The method as recited in claim 20, wherein the method does not require any of the files protected by the file security system to be modified if a password is changed for the user.
  • 22. The method as recited in claim 20, further comprising: denying the user from changing the password from the existing password to a new password in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 23. The method as recited in claim 20, further comprising: permitting a password to be changed from the existing password to the new password in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 24. The method as recited in claim 23, wherein the permitting comprises: encrypting the authentication string using the new password to produce a new encrypted authentication string; andstoring the new encrypted authentication string in the server machine for subsequent usage.
  • 25. An article of manufacture including a computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon, that, in response to execution by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations for authenticating a user to a file security system, the operations comprising: receiving a file access request including at least a password associated with the user;decrypting an encrypted authentication string with the password received with the file access request to produce a decrypted authentication string, the encrypted authentication string having been created using a random number of a predetermined length and encrypted using a previously-received password associated with the user; anddetermining whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting.
  • 26. The article of manufacture as recited in claim 25, the operations further comprising: permitting access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 27. The article of manufacture as recited in claim 25, the operations further comprising: denying access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 28. A computer readable medium having stored thereon, computer program code that, in response to execution by a computer, causes the computer to authenticate a user to a file security system by a method comprising: receiving a password associated with the user;accessing an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system, the encrypted authentication string having been created using a random number of a predetermined length and encrypted using a previously-received password, wherein the encrypted authentication string is associated with the user;wherein the encrypted authentication string is associated with the user;decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the received password to produce an authentication string; anddetermining whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting by the computer code for decrypting.
  • 29. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 28, the method further comprising: permitting access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 30. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 28, the method further comprising: denying access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 31. A computer readable medium having stored thereon, computer program code that, in response to execution by a computer, causes the computer to re-authenticate a user to a file security system by a method, where the user was previously authenticated to the file security system, the method comprising: accessing an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system, wherein the encrypted authentication string is associated with the user;determining whether a re-authorization condition exists; andre-authenticating the user to the file security system when the re-authorization condition exists, the re-authenticating comprising:receiving a password associated with the user;accessing an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system;decrypting the encrypted authentication string with the received password to produce an authentication string; anddetermining whether the user is re-authenticated based on the decrypting by the computer code for decrypting.
  • 32. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 31, the method further comprising: permitting access to the file security system in response to determining that the user is re-authenticated.
  • 33. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 31, the method further comprising: denying access to the file security system determining determines that the user is not re-authenticated.
  • 34. A tangible computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon to change a password associated with a file security system, the instructions comprising: instructions to receive a new password;instructions to retrieve a stored, existing password associated with the user;instructions to access an encrypted authentication string from a server machine associated with the file security system, the encrypted authentication string having been created by: generating a random number of a predetermined length;converting the random number into the authentication string; andencrypting the authentication string using the existing password,wherein the encrypted authentication string is associated with a user;instructions to decrypt the encrypted authentication string with the existing password to produce a decrypted authentication string; andinstructions to determine whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting.
  • 35. The tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 34, the instructions further comprising: instructions to deny the password to be changed from the existing password to the new password in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 36. The tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 34, the instructions further comprising: instructions to permit the password to be changed from the existing user password to the new password in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 37. A method for authenticating a user to a file security system, wherein the file security system includes a server portion and at least one client portion, the server portion residing in a server machine, and the client portion residing in a client machine, the method comprising: receiving a login request including at least a password associated with the user;decrypting an encrypted authentication string with the password received with the login request to produce a decrypted authentication string, the encrypted authentication string having been created using a random number of a predetermined length and encrypted using a previously-received password associated with the user; anddetermining whether the user is authenticated based on the decrypting.
  • 38. The method as recited in claim 37, further comprising: permitting access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is authenticated.
  • 39. The method as recited in claim 37, further comprising: denying access to files protected by the file security system in response to determining that the user is not authenticated.
  • 40. A method for authenticating a user to a file security system, the method comprising: generating a random number of a predetermined length;converting the random number into an authentication string;encrypting the authentication string using a previously-received password to produce an encrypted authentication string, wherein the encrypted authentication string and the previously-received password are associated with the user; andstoring the encrypted authentication string in a server machine associated with the file security system for subsequent usage.
  • 41. The method as recited in claim 40, wherein the file security system includes a server portion and at least one client portion, the server portion residing in a server machine, and the client portion residing in a client machine associated with the user, and further comprising causing the client machine to store the encrypted authentication string associated with the user.
  • 42. The method as recited in claim 40, further comprising storing the encrypted authentication string in the server machine.
  • 43. The method as recited in claim 40, wherein the method is performed on a client machine operating on a client portion of the file security system, and further comprising causing deletion of the received password after the authentication string is encrypted from memory of the client machine.
  • 44. An article of manufacture including a computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon, that, in response to execution by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations for authenticating a user to a file security system, the operations comprising: generating a random number of a predetermined length;converting the random number into an authentication string;encrypting the authentication string using a previously-the received password to produce an encrypted authentication string, wherein the encrypted authentication string and the previously-received password are is associated with the user; andstoring the encrypted authentication string in a server machine associated with the file security system for subsequent usage.
  • 45. A method for authenticating a user to a file security system, wherein the file security system includes a server portion and at least one client portion, the server portion residing in a server machine, and the client portion residing in a client machine, the method comprising: generating a random number of a predetermined length;converting the random number into an authentication string;encrypting the authentication string using a previously-received password associated with a user to produce an encrypted authentication string; andstoring the encrypted authentication string in the file security system to the server machine for subsequent usage.
US Referenced Citations (448)
Number Name Date Kind
4203166 Eshram et al. May 1980 A
4734568 Watanabe Mar 1988 A
4757533 Allen et al. Jul 1988 A
4796220 Wolfe Jan 1989 A
4799258 Davies Jan 1989 A
4827508 Shear May 1989 A
4888800 Marshall et al. Dec 1989 A
4972472 Brown et al. Nov 1990 A
5032979 Hecht et al. Jul 1991 A
5052040 Preston et al. Sep 1991 A
5058164 Elmer et al. Oct 1991 A
5144660 Rose Sep 1992 A
5204897 Wyman Apr 1993 A
5220657 Bly et al. Jun 1993 A
5235641 Nozawa et al. Aug 1993 A
5247575 Sprague et al. Sep 1993 A
5276735 Boebert et al. Jan 1994 A
5301247 Rasmussen et al. Apr 1994 A
5319705 Halter et al. Jun 1994 A
5369702 Shanton Nov 1994 A
5375169 Seheidt et al. Dec 1994 A
5404404 Novorita Apr 1995 A
5406628 Beller et al. Apr 1995 A
5414852 Kramer et al. May 1995 A
5434918 Kung et al. Jul 1995 A
5495533 Linehan et al. Feb 1996 A
5499297 Boebert Mar 1996 A
5502766 Boebert et al. Mar 1996 A
5535375 Eshel et al. Jul 1996 A
5557765 Lipner et al. Sep 1996 A
5570108 McLaughlin et al. Oct 1996 A
5584023 Hsu Dec 1996 A
5600722 Yamaguchi et al. Feb 1997 A
5606663 Kadooka Feb 1997 A
5655119 Davy Aug 1997 A
5661806 Nevoux et al. Aug 1997 A
5671412 Christiano Sep 1997 A
5673316 Auerbach et al. Sep 1997 A
5677953 Dolphin Oct 1997 A
5680452 Shanton Oct 1997 A
5684987 Mamiya et al. Nov 1997 A
5689718 Sakurai et al. Nov 1997 A
5699428 McDonnal et al. Dec 1997 A
5708709 Rose Jan 1998 A
5715403 Stefik Feb 1998 A
5717755 Shanton Feb 1998 A
5719941 Swift et al. Feb 1998 A
5720033 Deo Feb 1998 A
5729734 Parker et al. Mar 1998 A
5732265 Dewitt et al. Mar 1998 A
5745573 Lipner et al. Apr 1998 A
5748736 Mittra May 1998 A
5751287 Hahn et al. May 1998 A
5757920 Misra et al. May 1998 A
5765152 Ericson Jun 1998 A
5778065 Hauser et al. Jul 1998 A
5787169 Eldridge et al. Jul 1998 A
5787173 Seheidt et al. Jul 1998 A
5787175 Carter Jul 1998 A
5790789 Suarez Aug 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5813009 Johnson et al. Sep 1998 A
5821933 Keller et al. Oct 1998 A
5825876 Peterson Oct 1998 A
5835592 Chang et al. Nov 1998 A
5835601 Shimbo et al. Nov 1998 A
5857189 Riddle Jan 1999 A
5862325 Reed et al. Jan 1999 A
5870468 Harrison Feb 1999 A
5870477 Sasaki et al. Feb 1999 A
5881287 Mast Mar 1999 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5893084 Morgan et al. Apr 1999 A
5898781 Shanton Apr 1999 A
5922073 Shimada Jul 1999 A
5923754 Angelo et al. Jul 1999 A
5933498 Schneck et al. Aug 1999 A
5944794 Okamoto et al. Aug 1999 A
5953419 Lohstroh et al. Sep 1999 A
5968177 Batten-Carew et al. Oct 1999 A
5970502 Salkewicz et al. Oct 1999 A
5987440 O'Neil et al. Nov 1999 A
5991879 Still Nov 1999 A
5999907 Donner Dec 1999 A
6014730 Ohtsu Jan 2000 A
6023506 Ote et al. Feb 2000 A
6032216 Schmuck et al. Feb 2000 A
6038322 Harkins Mar 2000 A
6044155 Thomlinson et al. Mar 2000 A
6055314 Spies et al. Apr 2000 A
6058424 Dixon et al. May 2000 A
6061790 Bodnar May 2000 A
6069057 Richards May 2000 A
6085323 Shimizu et al. Jul 2000 A
6088717 Reed et al. Jul 2000 A
6088805 Davis et al. Jul 2000 A
6098056 Rusnak et al. Aug 2000 A
6101507 Cane et al. Aug 2000 A
6105131 Carroll Aug 2000 A
6122630 Strickler et al. Sep 2000 A
6134327 Van Oorschot Oct 2000 A
6134658 Multerer et al. Oct 2000 A
6134660 Boneh et al. Oct 2000 A
6134664 Walker Oct 2000 A
6141754 Choy Oct 2000 A
6145084 Zuili Nov 2000 A
6158010 Moriconi et al. Dec 2000 A
6161139 Win et al. Dec 2000 A
6182142 Win et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185684 Pravetz et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192408 Vahalia et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205549 Pravetz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212561 Sitaraman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223285 Komuro et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226618 Downs et al. May 2001 B1
6226745 Wiederhold et al. May 2001 B1
6240188 Dondeti et al. May 2001 B1
6249873 Richard et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253193 Ginter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6260040 Kauffman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260141 Park Jul 2001 B1
6263348 Kathrow et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272631 Thomlinson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272632 Carmen et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282649 Lambert et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289450 Pensak et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292895 Baltzley Sep 2001 B1
6292899 McBride Sep 2001 B1
6295361 Kadansky et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299069 Shona Oct 2001 B1
6301614 Najork et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308256 Folmsbee Oct 2001 B1
6308273 Goertzel et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314409 Schneck et al. Nov 2001 B2
6317777 Skarbo et al. Nov 2001 B1
6332025 Takahashi et al. Dec 2001 B2
6336114 Garrison Jan 2002 B1
6339423 Sampson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339825 Pensak et al. Jan 2002 B2
6341164 Dilkie et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343316 Sakata Jan 2002 B1
6347374 Drake et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349337 Parsons et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351813 Mooney et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356903 Baxter et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356941 Cohen Mar 2002 B1
6357010 Viets et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363480 Perlman Mar 2002 B1
6370249 Van Oorschot Apr 2002 B1
6381698 Devanbu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389433 Bolosky et al. May 2002 B1
6389538 Gruse et al. May 2002 B1
6393420 Peters May 2002 B1
6405315 Burns et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421714 Rai et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442688 Moses et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442695 Dutcher et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446090 Hart Sep 2002 B1
6449721 Pensak et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453353 Win et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466932 Dennis et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477544 Bolosky et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490680 Scheidt et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505300 Chan et al. Jan 2003 B2
6510349 Schnek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519700 Ram et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529956 Smith et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530020 Aoki Mar 2003 B1
6530024 Proctor Mar 2003 B1
6542608 Scheidt et al. Apr 2003 B2
6549623 Scheidt et al. Apr 2003 B1
6550011 Sims Apr 2003 B1
6557039 Leong et al. Apr 2003 B1
6567914 Just et al. May 2003 B1
6571291 Chow May 2003 B1
6584466 Serbinis et al. Jun 2003 B1
6587946 Jakobsson Jul 2003 B1
6588673 Chan et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594662 Sieffert et al. Jul 2003 B1
6598161 Kluttz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6603857 Batten-Carew et al. Aug 2003 B1
6608636 Roseman Aug 2003 B1
6611599 Natarajan Aug 2003 B2
6611846 Stoodley Aug 2003 B1
6615349 Hair Sep 2003 B1
6615350 Schell et al. Sep 2003 B1
6625650 Stelliga Sep 2003 B2
6629243 Kleinman et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633311 Douvikas et al. Oct 2003 B1
6640307 Viets et al. Oct 2003 B2
6646515 Jun et al. Nov 2003 B2
6647388 Numao et al. Nov 2003 B2
6678835 Shah et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687822 Jakobsson Feb 2004 B1
6711683 Laczko et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718361 Basani et al. Apr 2004 B1
6735701 Jacobson May 2004 B1
6738908 Bonn et al. May 2004 B1
6775779 England et al. Aug 2004 B1
6782403 Kino et al. Aug 2004 B1
6801999 Venkatesan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6807534 Erickson Oct 2004 B1
6807636 Hartman et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810389 Meyer Oct 2004 B1
6810479 Barlow et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816871 Lee Nov 2004 B2
6826698 Minkin et al. Nov 2004 B1
6834333 Yoshino et al. Dec 2004 B2
6834341 Bahl et al. Dec 2004 B1
6845452 Roddy et al. Jan 2005 B1
6851050 Singhal et al. Feb 2005 B2
6865555 Novak Mar 2005 B2
6874139 Krueger et al. Mar 2005 B2
6877136 Bess et al. Apr 2005 B2
6889210 Vainstein May 2005 B1
6891953 DeMello et al. May 2005 B1
6892201 Brown et al. May 2005 B2
6892306 En-Seung et al. May 2005 B1
6907034 Begis Jun 2005 B1
6909708 Krishnaswamy et al. Jun 2005 B1
6915434 Kuroda et al. Jul 2005 B1
6920558 Sames et al. Jul 2005 B2
6931450 Howard et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931530 Pham et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931597 Prakash Aug 2005 B1
6938042 Aboulhosn et al. Aug 2005 B2
6941355 Donaghey et al. Sep 2005 B1
6941456 Wilson Sep 2005 B2
6941472 Moriconi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944183 Iyer et al. Sep 2005 B1
6947556 Matyas, Jr. et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950818 Dennis et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950936 Subramaniam et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950941 Lee et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950943 Bacha et al. Sep 2005 B1
6952780 Olsen et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957261 Lortz Oct 2005 B2
6959308 Gramsamer et al. Oct 2005 B2
6961849 Davis et al. Nov 2005 B1
6968060 Pinkas Nov 2005 B1
6971018 Witt et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978376 Giroux et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978377 Asano et al. Dec 2005 B1
6988133 Zavalkovsky et al. Jan 2006 B1
6988199 Toh et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993135 Ishibashi Jan 2006 B2
6996718 Henry et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003117 Kacker et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003560 Mullen et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003661 Beattie et al. Feb 2006 B2
7013332 Friedel et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013485 Brown et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020645 Bisbee et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024427 Bobbitt et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035854 Hsiao et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035910 Dutta et al. Apr 2006 B1
7046807 Hirano et al. May 2006 B2
7051213 Kobayashi et al. May 2006 B1
7058696 Phillips et al. Jun 2006 B1
7058978 Feuerstein et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073063 Peinado Jul 2006 B2
7073073 Nonaka et al. Jul 2006 B1
7076067 Raike et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076312 Law et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076469 Schreiber et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076633 Tormasov et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080077 Ramamurthy et al. Jul 2006 B2
7095853 Takuya Aug 2006 B2
7096266 Lewin et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099926 Ims et al. Aug 2006 B1
7107269 Arlein et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107416 Stuart et al. Sep 2006 B2
7117322 Hochberg et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120635 Bhide et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120757 Tsuge Oct 2006 B2
7124164 Chemtob Oct 2006 B1
7130964 Ims et al. Oct 2006 B2
7131071 Gune et al. Oct 2006 B2
7134041 Murray et al. Nov 2006 B2
7136903 Phillips et al. Nov 2006 B1
7145898 Elliott Dec 2006 B1
7146388 Stakutis et al. Dec 2006 B2
7146498 Takechi et al. Dec 2006 B1
7159036 Hinchliffe et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171557 Kallahalla et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174563 Brownlie et al. Feb 2007 B1
7177427 Komuro et al. Feb 2007 B1
7178033 Garcia Feb 2007 B1
7181017 Nagel et al. Feb 2007 B1
7185364 Knouse et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187033 Pendharkar Mar 2007 B2
7188181 Squier et al. Mar 2007 B1
7194764 Martherus et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200747 Riedel et al. Apr 2007 B2
7203317 Kallahalla et al. Apr 2007 B2
7203968 Asano et al. Apr 2007 B2
7219230 Riedel et al. May 2007 B2
7224795 Takada et al. May 2007 B2
7225256 Villavicencio May 2007 B2
7227953 Shida Jun 2007 B2
7233948 Shamoon et al. Jun 2007 B1
7237002 Estrada et al. Jun 2007 B1
7249044 Kumar et al. Jul 2007 B2
7260555 Rossmann et al. Aug 2007 B2
7265764 Alben et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266684 Jancula Sep 2007 B2
7280658 Amini et al. Oct 2007 B2
7287055 Smith et al. Oct 2007 B2
7290148 Tozawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7308702 Thomsen et al. Dec 2007 B1
7313824 Bala et al. Dec 2007 B1
7319752 Asano et al. Jan 2008 B2
7340600 Corella Mar 2008 B1
7380120 Garcia May 2008 B1
7383586 Cross et al. Jun 2008 B2
7386529 Kiessig et al. Jun 2008 B2
20010011254 Clark Aug 2001 A1
20010021926 Schneck et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010032181 Jakstadt et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034839 Karjoth et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010044903 Yamamoto et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010056550 Lee Dec 2001 A1
20020010679 Felsher Jan 2002 A1
20020016922 Richards et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020031230 Sweet et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035624 Kim Mar 2002 A1
20020046350 Lordemann et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020050098 Chan May 2002 A1
20020056042 Van Der Kaay et al. May 2002 A1
20020062240 Morinville May 2002 A1
20020062245 Niu et al. May 2002 A1
20020069077 Brophy et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020069272 Kim et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020069363 Winburn Jun 2002 A1
20020073320 Rinkevich et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077986 Kobata et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077988 Sasaki et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087479 Malcolm Jul 2002 A1
20020099947 Evans Jul 2002 A1
20020124180 Hagman Sep 2002 A1
20020129235 Okamoto et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133699 Pueschel Sep 2002 A1
20020138762 Horne Sep 2002 A1
20020143710 Liu Oct 2002 A1
20020143906 Tormasov et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156726 Kleckner et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020157016 Russell et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169963 Seder et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169965 Hale et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020172367 Mulder et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174109 Chandy et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020176572 Ananth Nov 2002 A1
20020178271 Graham et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194484 Bolosky et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198798 Ludwig et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030009685 Choo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014391 Evans et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023559 Choi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028610 Pearson Feb 2003 A1
20030033528 Ozog et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037133 Owens Feb 2003 A1
20030037237 Abgrall et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037253 Blank et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046238 Nonaka et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030051039 Brown et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056139 Murray et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030074580 Knouse et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078959 Yeung et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030079175 Limantsev Apr 2003 A1
20030081784 Kallahalla et al. May 2003 A1
20030081787 Kallahalla et al. May 2003 A1
20030088517 Medoff May 2003 A1
20030088783 DiPierro May 2003 A1
20030101072 Dick et al. May 2003 A1
20030110169 Zuili Jun 2003 A1
20030110266 Rollins et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110397 Supramaniam Jun 2003 A1
20030115146 Lee et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115570 Bisceglia Jun 2003 A1
20030120601 Ouye Jun 2003 A1
20030120684 Zuili et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126434 Lim et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030154381 Ouye Aug 2003 A1
20030159066 Staw et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030172280 Scheidt et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177070 Viswanath et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177378 Wittkotter Sep 2003 A1
20030182579 Leporini et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182584 Banes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030196096 Sutton Oct 2003 A1
20030197729 Denoue et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200202 Hsiao et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217264 Martin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030217281 Ryan Nov 2003 A1
20030217333 Smith et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030226013 Dutertre Dec 2003 A1
20030233650 Zaner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040022390 McDonald et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040025037 Hair Feb 2004 A1
20040039781 LaVallee et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040064710 Vainstein Apr 2004 A1
20040068524 Aboulhosn et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040068664 Nachenberg et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073660 Toomey Apr 2004 A1
20040073718 Johannessen et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088548 Smetters et al. May 2004 A1
20040098580 DeTreville May 2004 A1
20040103202 Hildebrand et al. May 2004 A1
20040103280 Balfanz et al. May 2004 A1
20040133544 Kiessig et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040158586 Tsai Aug 2004 A1
20040193602 Liu et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193905 Lirov et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193912 Li et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199514 Rosenblatt et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215956 Venkatachary et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215962 Douceur et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040243853 Swander et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021467 Franzdonk Jan 2005 A1
20050021629 Cannata et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050028006 Leser et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050039034 Doyle et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050071275 Vainstein et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071657 Ryan Mar 2005 A1
20050071658 Nath et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050081029 Thornton et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086531 Kenrich Apr 2005 A1
20050091484 Thornton et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050120199 Carter Jun 2005 A1
20050138371 Supramaniam Jun 2005 A1
20050138383 Vainstein Jun 2005 A1
20050177716 Ginter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050177858 Ueda Aug 2005 A1
20050198326 Schlimmer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050223242 Nath Oct 2005 A1
20050223414 Kenrich et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050235154 Serret-Avila Oct 2005 A1
20050256909 Aboulhosn et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273600 Seeman Dec 2005 A1
20050283610 Serret-Avila et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288961 Tabrizi Dec 2005 A1
20060005021 Torrubia-Saez Jan 2006 A1
20060075465 Ramanathan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060093150 Reddy et al. May 2006 A1
20060168147 Inoue et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060230437 Boyer et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070006214 Dubal et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070067837 Schuster Mar 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
0 672 991 Sep 1995 EP
0 674 253 Sep 1995 EP
0 809 170 Nov 1997 EP
0 913 966 May 1999 EP
0 913 967 May 1999 EP
0 950 941 Oct 1999 EP
0 950 941 Oct 1999 EP
1 107 504 Jun 2001 EP
1 107504 Jun 2001 EP
1 130 492 Sep 2001 EP
1 154 348 Nov 2001 EP
1324565 Jul 2003 EP
2 328 047 Feb 1999 GB
2001-036517 Feb 2001 JP
WO 9641288 Dec 1996 WO
WO 0056028 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0161438 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0163387 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0163387 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0177783 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0178285 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0184271 Nov 2001 WO