This invention relates to the cords that are used to tether electronic products to displays in retail locations.
Tethered product displays have evolved in the retail market along with the evolution of technology from shoulder-carried camcorders to tablet devices and smart phones. The typical “big box” retailer has one or more display locations inside the store with an array of hand-held devices mounted to a countertop (or similar surface) at individual post positions. In some cases, the product is mounted to the post such that it cannot be lifted. More commonly, the product is tethered so that the consumer can lift the product and examine it, and thereafter, return it to rest on the countertop surface.
With respect to the latter situation, different types of tethered systems have evolved in the art. One of the more common types is a reeled, multi-conductor cable. The thin-gauge copper wires within this type of cable provide a certain degree of physical security against cutting, although primary security in this type of system involves providing electrical power to theft sensors that are triggered when power is cut. Alternatively, reeled steel cables have been used, mostly during the early beginnings of retail/hand-held security systems. This older type of system generally provides only physical security because the typical braided steel cable is difficult to cut. A third type of security/tether cable is a “curly-Q” cable, somewhat like the one that is common to older telephones and similar configurations. This last kind of cable offers extension and retraction of the cord (via the coils in the cord) without a reel. However, like the reeled, multi-conductor cable described above, it is also easy to cut because there is little more than thin-gauge copper wires inside the coils.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,592,548 describes a security cable having a central metal cord surrounded by a spiral wrap of electrical conductors. While this design combines the physical security of a steel cord with the need to have wiring inside the tether, it cannot be made to work in a “curly-Q” configuration where tether extension and retraction comes from coils that are closely spaced (i.e., like a coil spring).
The invention described here is an improvement over the types of power-security cords described above.
The invention is an improved power/security cord for use in a retail display. It includes a continuous length of spring steel next to at least one conductor that is surrounded by an exterior cord sheath. The steel provides cut-resistance but is arranged within the cord so as to provide a balance between cut resistance and flexibility.
In one embodiment, the combination of spring steel and conductor are coiled into the shape of a “curly-Q” cord with the coils of the cord providing elastic extension and retraction for respectively removing and returning displayed product (e.g., a tablet device or smart phone) to and from a retail display. As indicated, the spring steel coils provide physical security that makes it difficult to cut the cord without losing the normal extension and retraction of a curly-Q cord.
In this respect, the reader needs to bear in mind that the invention is specifically designed for use as a tether in a retail display where electronic products are sold. The tether needs to function in a situation where the consumer lifts and returns the product relative to the display during the course of handling the product (e.g., looking at particular cell phone or smartphone model the customer is interested in purchasing). Adding spring steel within a curly-Q cord structure involves altering the normal spring forces of the cord—which likewise alters the amount of “pull” that the consumer needs to put on the tether to pull the product away from the display. The spring coils need to be stiff or strong enough to return the cord to the fully retracted state—with coils tightly packed against each other. At the same time, the spring forces created via the use of steel in the cord cannot be of a magnitude such that pulling on the cord and holding the product while the cord is extended becomes noticeably difficult to the consumer. Within this balance, there needs to be sufficient thickness of the steel material so that it is difficult to cut (for security purposes). It should be noted that “spring steel” is just one of many cut resistant materials that could be used. Other metals, certain plastics, (e.g., Kevlar), etc. might be used as an alternative to increase the difficulty of cutting the security cord.
The separate conductor wire inside the coiled cord provides a means for transmitting electrical power through the cord that can be used to provide power to the hand-held or power the various kinds of security sensors that are often attached to the hand-held. The latter is conventional in that it is common to use one or more electrical conductors in a tether cable for electrically powering devices and security sensors at the same time, with the security sensors providing alarm generation means for creating an audio or visual alarm signal when the sensor is removed or the applicable conductor wire in power/security cord is cut. In the present case, the steel is included in the cord as a separate form of mechanical form of security that adds to electrical security alarm systems.
While the above implementation is described as using “spring steel” within a “curly-Q” configuration, it is to be understood that alternative implementations can be realized using other configurations of steel strands and multi-conductor combinations, described in this document. The issue involves the difficulty of combining steel wire with low gauge electrical wire in a tether designed to be used in retail security displays. The curly-Q cord is one type of known tether design, except there is no evidence in the prior art, known to applicant, that the prior art teaches how to embed steel coils in a curly-Q cord with low gauge conductor wires to create a useful tether that works for the consumer (i.e., is easy to pull and hold) but provides the retailer with desired security against theft.
It may be possible to provide the same kind of functionality in a non-curly-Q cord situation (i.e., a reeled retractor) by using a prearranged number of steel cable strands relative to a prearranged number of conductor cords within the matrix of the cord. In this respect, in one of the embodiments described below, the power/security cord could consist of a four (or less or more) conductor design that is a “non-coiled” configuration—the number of conductors corresponding to the number of electrical circuits that are desired for providing power and security at the hand-held level. The conductors are interwoven with or run parallel to thin steel strands within the cable. Striking a proper balance between steel and conductors in this type of design might allow production of a cable that can be put on a small reel, thus providing the same functionality as prior art, reeled retractors, but with the added mechanical security of steel.
Regardless of the implementation, the number and arrangement of steel strands and conductors in the cable can be tailored to meet the need for the specific retail tether implementation. In situations where an even larger number of conductors is desired (e.g., six conductors as an example), it may be desirable to include some type of central filler core.
According to yet another aspect of the design described here, and regardless of the specific power/security cord implementation (i.e., coiled or non-coiled) the conductors need protection against strain relief, which is now provided by the steel that is embedded in the cord. In other words, it is typical to use RJ12 connectors at each end of a power/security cord for easily connecting or disconnecting the cord to and from electrical boards in mounting platforms or other types of mounting devices. As indicated above, the power/security cord is usually designed to permit a consumer to lift a hand-held from a retail display surface, examine it, and then return it to the display. The forces acting on the cord during these movements will place significant strain on the typical RJ12 connector (or other kinds of wire-to-wire connections)—which can cause electrical problems and/or malfunctions in the security system. In accordance with the invention, therefore, adding steel to the cord enables using the ends of the steel strands to provide strain relief in a security tether in the retail market. As will become apparent from the following description, this is accomplished by capturing the ends of the steel cable independently from the electrical end connections of the cable.
The foregoing summary will become more clear upon review of the following detailed description, which is to be taken in conjunction with the drawings.
In the drawings, like reference numerals and letters refer to like parts throughout the various views, and wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, and first to
Referring now to
Each end of the power/security cord 10 has a conventional electrical connector 22 (e.g., RJ12 connector) which would be familiar to a person skilled in the art. Directing attention briefly to
The combination of steel strands 24 and conductors 26 are collectively surrounded by a thin sheath 30; which is further surrounded by an exterior sheath 32. This interior configuration represents the span between the opposite ends 22 of the cord 10 shown in
Turning to
The steel strands 24 inside the coils 20 continue through the straight portions 38, 40 and exit, with each end terminated by a brass ferrule and washer fitting 46, 48. This arrangement relieves the strain on the electrical end connectors 22 that are branched away from ferrule/washer 46, 48.
More specifically, and referring now to
The housing 52 might be the same as item 16 in
It is important to understand that at least one steel strand 24 is included in the cord 10 and at least one conductor 26. However, as reflected in
To summarize, these embodiments enable the construction of a coiled cord for use as a power/security tether in retail displays. It is anticipated that the steel strands will be made of spring steel and coiled in the shape illustrated at 20 in
The foregoing sets forth the best mode for carrying out the invention. Whether limited to coiled or non-coiled applications, it is to be understood that the scope of patent protection is not to be limited by the foregoing description. Instead, the scope of patent protection is to be limited only by the claim or claims that follow below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1730945 | Poole | Oct 1929 | A |
2060913 | Weaver | Nov 1936 | A |
3324233 | Bryant | Jun 1967 | A |
3813481 | Adams | May 1974 | A |
3816644 | Giffel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4357500 | Nilsen | Nov 1982 | A |
4384688 | Smith | May 1983 | A |
4590337 | Engelmore | May 1986 | A |
4719319 | Tighe, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4746766 | Soulard | May 1988 | A |
4964414 | Handa | Oct 1990 | A |
5016646 | Gotthardt et al. | May 1991 | A |
5119457 | Callahan | Jun 1992 | A |
5146205 | Keifer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5279135 | Leyden | Jan 1994 | A |
5315063 | Auclair | May 1994 | A |
5763836 | Anastasi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5834699 | Buck et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5884403 | Rogers | Mar 1999 | A |
6170775 | Kovacik et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6386906 | Burke | May 2002 | B1 |
6396414 | Bickford | May 2002 | B1 |
6748707 | Buchalter et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6831560 | Gresset | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6896543 | Fort et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6946961 | Frederiksen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7053774 | Sedon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7101187 | Deconinck et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7202417 | Marszalek et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209038 | Deconinck et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7385522 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7446659 | Marsilio et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7522047 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7626500 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7724135 | Rapp et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744404 | Henson et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7861501 | Poulin | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8674833 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020171604 | Tadysak | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050134458 | Leyden | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060011378 | Maeda | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053939 | Basile et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060131062 | Bertges | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080142665 | Belden et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168806 | Belden et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169923 | Belden | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090033492 | Rapp | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090173868 | Fawcett et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211784 | Grogl | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110303816 | Horvath | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309928 | Henson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309934 | Henson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120120571 | Bisesti et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120188082 | Berglund et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120299755 | Jones | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“35 mm Camera Display”—Walmart Publication 1995. |
Huseby, Inc. “Transcript of Deposition of Thaine H. Allison, III,” Feb. 24, 2014, Charlotte, NC. |
“Reasons for Substantial New Question of Patentability”, paper issued in Control No. 96/000,007, Jan. 30, 2013. |
Mike Cook, “Declaration of Mike Cook,” pleading filed in Case No. 3:10-cv-392-BR, U.S. District Court (Oregon), Oct. 19, 2010. |
Office Action, issued in Horvath (U.S. Appl. No. 12/802,644), dated Nov. 30, 2012. |
MTI 2008 PowerPoint, “Vanguard Program” (Exhibit 1005 of Declaration of Mike Cook), pp. 1-9. |
MTI, “Freedom Universal 2.0 Product Manual,” (manual), Dec. 2008. |
Protex International Corp., “Instructions for PowerPro Detangler,” (instruction sheet, 2005, Bohemia, New York. |
Protex International Corp., “Instructions for PowerPro Sensor Head,” (instruction sheet), 2007, Bohemia, New York. |
Protex International Corp., “PowerPro System,” (instruction sheet) 2006, Bohemia, New York. |
Reuters, “MTI Beings Shipping Freedom(TM) Universal 2.0 Merchandising Solution,” (article), Oct. 1, 2008. |
Thaine H. Allison, III, “Declaration of Thaine Allison in Support of Patent Owner's Reply to Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend,” pleading filed in PTAB Case IPR2013-00122, Feb. 5, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130161054 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |