The present invention relates generally to cotton handling systems and, more specifically, to cotton handling systems wherein wrapped cotton bales or modules are transported from a field to a gin for processing.
Harvested cotton is typically formed into a bale or module and transported to a gin for processing. Recent developments in in-field processors such as on-board cotton baling or module forming provide substantial potential for improved productivity. However, conventional cotton processing and the infrastructure associated with the conventional processing continues to dominate the cotton industry. Transitioning to handling crop bales or modules formed on a harvester has been a source of difficulty.
Additional difficulties are encountered when a bale or module of harvested material is supported within a wrap such as plastic sheet or netting to protect and maintain integrity of the formed material. When processing seed cotton, the handling system must be able to effectively separate all the cotton material from the wrap before the baled seed cotton enters the cotton gin. Wrapped cotton loses bale shape integrity quickly as the wrap is removed, and therefore substantial difficulties must be overcome to provide a system that advantageously utilizes the wrap to maintain a compact and clean entry configuration while allowing full cotton removal, eliminating spillage, and providing reliable wrap removal.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved cotton handling system. It is a further object to provide such a system which overcomes the aforementioned problems.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a cotton handling system for feeding wrapped bales of cotton to a gin for processing. It is a further object to provide such a system which effectively separates bale wrap material from the cotton in an efficient manner. It is yet another object to provide such a system with an effective conveying and wrap cutting system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a wrapped bale handling system which is compatible with more conventional handling systems and is economical and easy to use.
Cotton bales formed in the field are wrapped in sheet plastic, netting or other similar material for protection and bale integrity. The wrapped bales are transported from the harvest area to a cotton receiver at the gin and moved intact to a position adjacent a receiver upstream of the ginning equipment. As the bales are conveyed, a knife, rotating blade or other cutting structure severs the wrap allowing the cotton to drop into the receiver. The conveying structure can include adjustable cantilever supports which are spread prior to cutting of the wrap to increase the tension and severability of the wrap and facilitate full removal of the cotton. Wrap engaging structure such as a bale handler spike and retractable support claws prevent the wrap from entering the receiver and ginning equipment. In another embodiment of the invention, air pressure differential is utilized to engage the wrap and convey the wrap to a processor for destruction, packaging or recycling.
The handling system is efficient, economical and easy to use. Compared to traditional cotton handling systems, only a limited amount of additional equipment is required. The wrapped cotton bale or module is maintained in a compact package until the cotton is deposited at the gin and cotton spillage is eliminated or minimized.
These and other objects, features and advantages will become apparent from the description below and the drawings.
Referring to
The processing area 20 includes a walled receiver such as shown at 22 having an upwardly opening inlet 24 for receiving seed cotton. A cotton conveyor 26 conveys the cotton material to conventional ginning equipment. A bale positioning or conveying system 30 positions the wrapped bale 12 generally intact at a location adjacent the receiver 22. Wrap removal or engaging structure indicated generally at 32 is located adjacent the receiver 22 to facilitate separation of the cotton in the bale 12 from the wrap 14 and entry of the cotton into the area 20 through the inlet 24 for processing. After the cotton in the bale 12 is separated from the wrap 12, the structure 32 removes the wrap to prevent entry of wrap material into the receiver 22 and ginning equipment.
The bale conveying system as shown in
Different types of wrap removal structure 32 may be used to separate the wrap 12 from the cotton and prevent wrap from entering the ginning equipment. As shown in
The upper wrap engaging structure 52 includes an axially projecting rod or spike adjustably supported from a mast 62 on the handler 42. Upon initial engagement of the bale 12 by the handler 42, the spike 52 enters the bale just below the top extremity of the wrap 14. Upon severing of the wrap 14 by the cutter 50, the wrap 14 drapes over the spike 52 (
In addition to the spike 52, the lower wrap engaging structure 54 may also be provided adjacent the forks 44. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3-5, the structure 54 includes a plurality of retractable claws 54′ (
The lower wrap engaging structure 54, when provided, also may be used to help stretch or tension the wrap 14 in the area of that will be severed by the cutter 50. After the cotton bale 12 is engaged by the forks 44 and the claws 54′ of the structure 54 enter the wrap 14, the forks 44 can be spread (
In an alternate embodiment of the invention shown in
Having described the preferred embodiment, it will become apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3757973 | Lambert et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3820197 | JeanMaire | Jun 1974 | A |
3853235 | Lambert et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4250783 | Ogle | Feb 1981 | A |
4344272 | Gaudette et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348801 | Dumont et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4794671 | Goldman | Jan 1989 | A |
4798508 | Lewis | Jan 1989 | A |
4929141 | Keesey et al. | May 1990 | A |
5072490 | Leifeld et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5090864 | Leifeld | Feb 1992 | A |
5179878 | Kranefeld et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5199841 | Von Gehlen | Apr 1993 | A |
5203665 | Lande | Apr 1993 | A |
5282713 | Lande | Feb 1994 | A |
5318399 | Marom | Jun 1994 | A |
5328016 | Leifeld et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5442895 | Linson | Aug 1995 | A |
5443347 | Weinlader | Aug 1995 | A |
5445490 | Whitehead | Aug 1995 | A |
5537809 | Blalock | Jul 1996 | A |
6032446 | Gola et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6263650 | Deutsch et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6591743 | Deutsch et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6685120 | Grellner | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20010000464 | Beale | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20020048501 | Maclay | Apr 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050207877 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |