It is well recognized that proper and uniform spacing of seed in the furrow is essential to maximizing crop yield. The first step in achieving uniform spacing is to accurately dispense one seed and one seed only at the proper timing. This “singulation” accuracy is a performance benchmark that is well known for many types of seed meters, whether mechanical or pneumatic, and is often tested on a seed meter test stand prior to the beginning of the planting season.
There are many different manufacturers of pneumatic seed meters which fall into the more specific categories of air meters and vacuum meters. An example of one type of commercially successful air meter is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,888,387 to Decider. An example of one type of commercially successful vacuum meter is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,909 to Lundie et al. Other commercially successful vacuum meters include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,428 to Stufflebeam et al., U.S. Patent Publication No. 20050204972 to Eben et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,990,606 to Gugenhan. Many of these meters have historically operated at performance levels of 93% to 97% accuracy. Recent improvements to vacuum meters have allowed them to operate at a typical accuracy of 98 to 99%. The vacuum meter is capable of 99% singulation on some seed types but has been plagued with the need for adjustment in order to attain that performance. Secondly, the particular design of many of these meters has made them susceptible to reduced performance levels as a result of manufacturing tolerances.
A problem affecting singulation accuracy with vacuum meters that utilize “celled-disks” (i.e., disks with indentations or “cells” around each aperture in the disk, such as the disks disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,909 to Lundie et al.), is that such meters have a higher tendency to plant “skips” and “doubles” in near succession when planting flat shaped seeds. Despite this tendency, however, celled-disk vacuum meters offer the unique advantage of permitting the meter to generally operate at lower vacuum levels than meters that use flat or non-celled disks (i.e., vacuum disks with apertures only) because the indentations or cells assist in holding the seeds in place, thus requiring less vacuum pressure to entrain the seeds.
In an attempt to improve singulation accuracy, farmers have tried to use non-celled disks with meters originally designed for celled-disk meters. For example, with the John Deere MaxEmerge vacuum meters, farmers started using one of the specialty disks designed by John Deere for planting irregular seeds such as sweet corn (thus, this disk is often referred to as the “sweet corn disk”). The sweet corn disk is flat on the planting surface and does not have any indentations or cells to hold the seed. Similar to the sweet corn disk, an update kit, known as the Accu-Vac Update Kit, available from S.I. Distributing, Inc. St. Marys, Ohio, utilizes a flat, non-celled disk. The Accu-Vac disk has larger apertures in order to ensure the seeds are adequately entrained so they do not prematurely slough-off as the disk rotates. While the sweet corn disk and the Accu-Vac disk have markedly increased singulation performance when used in place of celled-disk, both have resulted in a system that requires very tedious adjustments by the planter operator in order to achieve optimum performance. Furthermore, the design of this meter and the nature of disks to warp over time has resulted in difficulty in keeping the double eliminator in proper alignment with the disk.
Other vacuum seed meters such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,990,606 to Gugenhan have relied upon the flat disk with apertures and a seed stripping “singulator.” These designs have provided for more repeatable and operator-friendly adjustments but the need still remains for adjustment. The meter disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,428 to Stufflebeam et al. utilizes a flat disk and three spring loaded singulating spools that compensate for tolerances in one direction, but the spools do not compensate for radial translation of the disk.
Accordingly, there remains a need for a seed singulator that can be used with different types of meters and different types of seed disks, but which can deliver very high singulation accuracy while requiring minimal adjustments for seed type or manufacturing tolerances and wherein the singulation accuracy is not adversely effected by axial and radial translations of the disk.
The present invention is directed to a seed singulator for use with a vacuum disk having a seed face and a shoulder. The seed singulator has a first member and a second member supported by biasing members. The first member has upper lobes disposed at a radius of curvature slightly less than the outside radius of a row of apertures on a seed plane of the vacuum disk. The seed member has lower lobes disposed at a radius of curvature slightly greater than the inside radius than the row of apradius. The biasing members permit the lobes to move with the seed plane and the shoulder as the vacuum disk rotates thereby maintaining their position with respect to the apertures.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
As best illustrated in
As best illustrated in
A preferred embodiment of a seed singulator assembly 900 is shown in
It is known that singulation performance improves with an increasing number of times that the seeds are contacted by the singulating lobes. It has been determined that superior singulation accuracy is achieved by bumping or agitating the seeds from both the top side (i.e., the outside radius R of the apertures) and the bottom side (i.e., the inside radius R3 of the apertures). For example, if a singulator is used that only bumps the seeds from the top side, then some seeds multiples may be able to “hang” on the very bottom of the aperture and would not be stripped or removed by the top singulator. Furthermore, it has been found that singulation can be best achieved when the seed is contacted three times from the top side of the apertures 208, 508 relative to the path of travel and two times from the bottom side of the apertures 208, 508.
Accordingly, in the preferred embodiment, a rail 906 supports three lobes 908, 910, 912. As illustrated in
Referring to
Continuing to refer to
It should be appreciated that the preferred embodiment permits the lobes 908, 910, 912, 914, 916 to “float” with the seed plane 222, 522 and the shoulder 230, 530 of the disk 200, 500. This ability to float provides inherent advantages. For example, during rotation, the disk 200, 500 may translate about the central axis due to warping, or as a result of the bearing or hub being out of alignment, or possibly due to bending or flexing of the disk 200, 500 caused by the pressure differential between the seed-side face and the vacuum side face of the disk. Additionally, the disk 200, 500 may be subject to radial translation caused by improper hub alignment, mounting tolerances or disk eccentricities associated with the manufacturing process or manufacturing tolerances.
Thus, by providing a singulator with lobes that float and remain in contact with the seed plane 222, 522 and/or in contact with the top of the shoulder 230, 530, the singulator assembly 900 is able to compensate for both radial translation and axial translation and radial rotation of the disk, while the amount of coverage of the apertures 108,208, 508 by the passing lobes 908, 910, 912, 914, 916 remains constant regardless of the movement of the disk 200, 500. Additionally, the spring biased suspension of the lobes permits the lobes to flex away from the apertures 208, 508 in the case a seed or fragment becomes stuck in the aperture. This flexure prevents adverse wear to the surfaces 924 and edges of the lobes and also improves performance by preventing sudden jerking of the disk due to seeds wedging between an inflexible or immovable singulator and the aperture.
A further advantage of the preferred embodiment of the spring suspension system of the singulator 900 is that the singulator assembly 900 need not be removed when switching from the offset disk 500 to a celled (with which a singulator is not generally used). Instead, in the preferred embodiment, the rail 906 is capable of being locked into a depressed position whereby the lobes 908, 910, 912, 914, 916 will not contact the seed-side face 104204, 504 of the disk 100200, 500. Referring to
The foregoing description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment of the singulator assembly, such as the various alternative embodiments disclosed in co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/710,014 incorporated herein in its entirety, and the general principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. Thus, the present invention is not to be limited to the embodiments of the apparatus and methods described above and illustrated in the drawing figures, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation reissue of Reissue application Ser. No. 13/451,386, filed Apr. 19, 2012, now Reissue U.S. Pat. No. Re. 45,412, which is a broadening reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 7,699,099, issued Apr. 20, 2010, which is a national stage of International Application No. PCT/US2006/032256, filed Aug. 17, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/710,014, filed Aug. 19, 2005.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/032256 | 8/17/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/3/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/024646 | 3/1/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3627050 | Hansen | Dec 1971 | A |
3888387 | Deckler | Jun 1975 | A |
3990606 | Gugenhan | Nov 1976 | A |
4469244 | Maury | Sep 1984 | A |
4579251 | Gugenhan | Apr 1986 | A |
5170909 | Lundie et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5535917 | Ribouleau | Jul 1996 | A |
5842428 | Stufflebeam et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6109193 | Crabb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
7093548 | Eben et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7152542 | Eben et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20050150442 | Friesen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050204972 | Eben et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011462 | Sep 1971 | DE |
2011462 | Sep 1971 | DE |
106299 | Apr 1984 | EP |
106299 | Feb 1986 | EP |
Entry |
---|
S. I. Distributing Inc. “Successful Innovations for Agriculture”. http://www.sidist.com/product.asp?is=2 Mar. 30, 2007. |
John Deere and Company, “Double eliminator for Pro-Series™ vacuum meters”. https://jdparts.deere.com/partsmkt/document/english/pmac/9673—fb—DoubleEliminatorProSeriesVacMeters . . . Mar. 30, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60710014 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13451386 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 12064059 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12064059 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 14658971 | US | |
Parent | 12064059 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 13451386 | US |